DR. ROKSANA H. VARASHTI
AMITY LAW SCHOOL, NOIDA
a) Trademarks which are not capable of
distinguishing the goods
b) Trademark which consist only of such
marks or of such indications which may
function in trade to specify the kind, quality
and etc.
c) Trademark which
consists only of such
marks or indication which
have become customary
in the current language
a) To deceive the public or can even cause confusion.
b) To hurt the religious sentiment of any class or section
of Indian citizens.
c) To contain any kind of scandalous or obscene matters.
d) Its using is prohibited under the Emblem & Names
(Prevention of Improper use) Act, 1950
a) The shape of goods result
from the nature of the goods.
b) The shape of goods is
necessary to obtain a technical result.
c) The shape of goods adds
substantial value.
Relative grounds for
trademark refusal is by
reason of conflict with
prior trademarks and
well-known marks.
it reproduces all
elements of trademark
without any modification
or additions
“Deceptively similar” so
nearly resembling that other
mark as to be likely to
deceive or cause confusion”.
Removing Conflicting Goods or Services
Consent from Trademark Owner
Honest Concurrent Use of Trademark
Division of Trademark Application
THANK YOU

Grounds of Refusal1.pptx

  • 1.
    DR. ROKSANA H.VARASHTI AMITY LAW SCHOOL, NOIDA
  • 2.
    a) Trademarks whichare not capable of distinguishing the goods b) Trademark which consist only of such marks or of such indications which may function in trade to specify the kind, quality and etc.
  • 3.
    c) Trademark which consistsonly of such marks or indication which have become customary in the current language
  • 4.
    a) To deceivethe public or can even cause confusion. b) To hurt the religious sentiment of any class or section of Indian citizens. c) To contain any kind of scandalous or obscene matters. d) Its using is prohibited under the Emblem & Names (Prevention of Improper use) Act, 1950
  • 5.
    a) The shapeof goods result from the nature of the goods. b) The shape of goods is necessary to obtain a technical result. c) The shape of goods adds substantial value.
  • 6.
    Relative grounds for trademarkrefusal is by reason of conflict with prior trademarks and well-known marks.
  • 7.
    it reproduces all elementsof trademark without any modification or additions
  • 8.
    “Deceptively similar” so nearlyresembling that other mark as to be likely to deceive or cause confusion”.
  • 9.
    Removing Conflicting Goodsor Services Consent from Trademark Owner Honest Concurrent Use of Trademark Division of Trademark Application
  • 10.