Presentation delivered during the 13th Annual Meeting of the OECD Network on Fiscal Relations Across Levels of Government, 23-24 November 2017, Paris, France.
2. Background
• Why globalisation?
– Dani Rodrik (JPE, 1998): government size and
openness interact, as a larger government size
helps to offset risks (i.e. terms-of-trade shocks)
– Alberto Alesina (early 2000s): gov’t size and
openness interact, with decentralisation
addressing greater heterogeneity of preferences
– Much less work looking at globalisation and
fiscal decentralisation, especially as they affect
inclusive growth
2
3. Globalisation changes the picture
3
Central and local government spending responds to
globalisation (openness) in opposite ways
Source: Akgun and Dougherty (2017)
4. Marginal effect of globalisation on growth
4
Expenditure decentralisation Revenue decentralisation
5. Marginal effect of globalisation on inequality
5
Index of globalisation Index of globalisation
Expenditure decentralisation Revenue decentralisation
6. Main results
• Tradeoffs between growth and equity,
once globalisation is taken into account
• Broadly, decentralisation tends to be
better for growth than for equity
• Many results are country-specific, with
no “easy answers” – it depends where
you are at on the policy topology (i.e. how
centralised or decentralised you are)
6
7. 7Twitter @econecho
Forthcoming in the next edition of
the Fiscal Federalism Studies
• Fiscal Decentralisation and
Inclusive Growth
• Based on Workshop in May 2017
• To be launched in early 2018
• Preview on Clearspace very soon
•Website: http://oe.cd/fiscalnetwork