SlideShare a Scribd company logo
New Jersey Institute for Continuing Legal 
Education 
September 23, 2014
Anthony F. Della Pelle, Esq. , CRE (Moderator) 
John H. Buonocore, Jr., Esq. 
(McKirdy & Riskin, PA) 
Timothy P. Duggan, Esq. 
(Stark & Stark) 
Wanda Y. Ortiz 
(Deputy Attorney General, State of NJ) 
Maurice J. Stack, CRE 
(Stack, Coolahan & Stack) 
2
 Power of Eminent Domain 
 Just Compensation 
 Legal Resources 
 Prelitigation Issues 
 Litigation 
 Valuation and Appraisal 
 Non-Compensability 
 Environmental Issues 
 Relocation 
 Question and Answer 
3
 Constitutional and Legislative Grant of Authority 
 Enabling Legislation – Municipal, County, Special 
Agency, State and Federal Governments 
 Public Use Requirement 
 Requirement for Just Compensation 
4
 "...nor shall private property be taken for public use 
without just compensation." 
 U.S. Const. Amend. V 
 "Private property shall not be taken for public use without 
just compensation. Individuals or private corporations 
shall not be authorized to take property for public use 
without just compensation first made to the owners." 
 N.J.S.A. Const. Art. 1, Sec. 20 
5
 Compensation for the property taken 
 Reduction in value (damages) to any remaining 
property 
 Interest 
 Indemnity for loss 
 Attorneys’ fees and costs not generally 
recoverable by condemnee 
6
 Eminent Domain Act - N.J.S.A.20:3-1 et seq. 
 Rule 4:73 (Condemnation) 
 Relocation Assistance Act - N.J.S.A. 20:4-1 et 
seq., N.J.S.A. 27:7-72, et seq. and regulations - 
N.J.A.C. 5:11-1; N.J.A.C. 16:6-1.1 et seq. 
 Local Redevelopment and Housing Law – 
N.J.S.A. 40A:12A:-1, et seq. 
7
8 
21 New Jersey Practice, 
Skills and Methods, 
Eminent Domain
9
 The Appraisal of Real Estate, 13th Ed. Appraisal 
Institute 
 Eaton, Real Estate Valuation in Litigation, 2d Ed., 
Appraisal Institute 
10
 N.J.S.A. 20:3-1 et seq. 
 Uniform procedure applicable to all proceedings 
in which the power to condemn is being exercised, 
except acquisitions by PANYNJ which proceed 
pursuant to N.J.S.A. 32:1-77, et seq. 
 Applies to “inverse” actions 
11
 Attempt at amicable resolution through bona fide 
negotiations 
 Final judgment on authority for and due exercise 
of power by condemnor 
 Commissioners’ Hearing 
 Jury Trial on appeal from Commissioners’ Report 
on the issue of just compensation 
12
 Fact finder is concerned with just compensation 
only - Court adjudicates all other issues (e.g., title, 
proceeds allocation) 
 One award representing the value of all interests 
in the property (“unit rule”) 
 Award must take into account all damages, both 
present and prospective - no further proceedings 
or relief 
13
 Real vs. Personal Property 
 As to real estate, “functional unit” test for “fixture” 
issues 
 Interplay between functional unit and moving 
expenses as relocation benefit 
* N.J.S.A. 20:3-2(d) 
* State v. Gallant, 42 N.J. 583 (1964) 
14
Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 20:3-30, the earliest of the 
following events: 
 Date possession is taken by the condemnor 
 Complaint date 
 Date on which condemnor substantially affects 
use and enjoyment of property 
 Declaration of “blight” or “in need of 
redevelopment” determination, but see N.J.S.A. 
20:3-38 
* See Kirby Forest Industries v. U.S., 467 U.S. 1 (1984) 
15
 Prelitigation Entry and Inspection/Evaluation 
 Title Searches 
 Parcel Surveys 
 Appraisal 
 Environmental Inspections 
 Right of Entry 
16
 Notice of appraisal inspection 
 Written offer by certified mail 
 Offer not less than approved appraisal 
 Description of property to be acquired 
 Disclosure of all appraisals obtained 
 Minimum 14 days for reply to offer 
 Must address issues raised by owner 
17
 Complaint 
 Order to Show Cause 
 Declaration of Taking 
 Order Permitting Deposit 
 Notices 
 Answer 
 Judgment Appointing Commissioners 
18
Must include: 
 a statement showing the 
amount of compensation 
offered by the condemnor; 
 a reasonable disclosure of the 
manner in which the amount 
has been calculated. 
“Reasonable disclosure” by the 
condemnor includes furnishing 
the condemnee with: 
 the map 
 a description of land to be 
acquired 
 the identity of the 
improvements to be acquired, 
if any 
 a statement of the full fair 
market value 
 a description of the appraisal 
valuation method or methods 
relied upon 
(cont’d) 
19
 a breakdown of the appraised 
value allocated to the land to be 
acquired, and improvements to 
be acquired, if any; 
Data concerning comparable sales 
or leases relied upon in 
determining the amount of 
compensation offered which 
shall include: 
 names of seller and purchaser or 
landlord and tenant, 
 the location of the property by 
block, lot, street, street number, 
and municipality, 
 date of sale or date and duration 
of lease 
 the consideration for the sale or 
amount of rent 
 the book and page number of the 
recording of the deed of the 
comparable sale 
 any unusual factors concerning 
the property known to the 
condemnor which may affect 
value. 
20
 Join all parties with an interest in the property, e.g.: 
◦ Tenants, holders of easements, occupants 
◦ Mortgagees and other lien holders 
◦ Municipality (for taxes) 
 Only those parties who are joined have their interest 
foreclosed by the proceedings. 
 Easements are to be condemned separately as a “DE” parcel 
together with the property which it serves; the area of the 
easement should be designated on the servient parcel as 
“SE” and the appraisal should adjust accordingly. 
21
 Action is brought in a summary manner pursuant 
to R.4:67. 
 May be presented to the court ex parte. 
 No summons, but language is consistent 
 Served within the state at least 10 days before the 
return date 
22
 Basically, a “deed” from the condemnor to itself 
 Fixes the property and rights acquired based on 
legal description 
 Recorded in County Clerk/Register’s office 
23
 Provides for deposit of estimated compensation 
(usually the amount of the offer per the appraisal) 
 May be obtained ex parte 
24
 Proof of Service of Deposit and Filing/Recording 
of Declaration of Taking 
 Notice of making of deposit into court to owner 
 Proof of service of such notice must be filed in the 
action prior to taking possession. 
25
 Provided no declaration of taking has been filed, the action may be 
unilaterally abandoned by the condemnor 
 at any time before, or within 30 days after, the filing of the award of 
commissioners; 
 or in the event of an appeal from the award, at any time before, or 
within 30 days after, the entry of judgment; 
 or in the event that a hearing before commissioners is waived, at 
any time before, or within 30 days after, judgment has been entered 
in the action. [N.J.S.A. 20:3-35] 
 Otherwise, condemnee must consent to abandonment 
 Entitlement to fees costs and expenses. N.J.S.A.20:3-26(b) 
 West Orange v. 769 Associates, LLC, 397 N.J. Super. 244 (App. 
Div. 2007) 
26
Certain Classes of Damages are not Compensable as a 
Matter of Law: 
(1) Loss of business; franchise, future or current 
profits, tenants or good will. 
State by Commissioner of Transportation v. Hess Realty Corp., 226 N.J. 
Super. 256 (App. Div. 1988), certif.. den. 113 N.J. 229 (1989), certif.. 
den. 493 U.S. 964 (1989). 
(2) Damages based upon use of land acquired from 
others; e.g. power lines of adjoining property do not 
constitute a compensable taking. 
Public Service Elec. & Gas v. Oldwick, 125 N.J. Super. 31 (App. Div. 
1973), certif.. den. 64 N.J. 113 (1973) 
27
(3) Change in grade/visibility is not compensable unless it 
is caused by the taking itself: State, by Commr. of 
Transp. v. Weisswasser, 149 N.J. 320 (1997); 
(4) Typically noise and vibration impacts are not 
compensable since they tend to be speculative; in 
order to be compensable it must be demonstrated that 
there is a measurable increase in noise level and/or 
vibrations actually caused by taking and that they are 
reflected in the market place. See State by Comm’r of 
Transp. V. Carroll, 123 N.J. 308 (1991). 
28
(5) Upstream generated drainage is not compensable in 
condemnation action; only direct problems resulting 
from the land taken; See State by Comm’r of Transp. 
V. Rosenblum, 200 N.J.Super. 209 (App. Div 1985). 
(6) Landscaping/Sand/Gravel/Minerals/Crops are not 
valued separately since they are elements of land 
taken; must demonstrate enhancement value; See 
State v. Whitehead Bros. Co., 210 N.J. Super. 359 
(Law Div. 1986); see also Tennessee Gas 
Transmission Co. v. Maze, 45 N.J. Super. 496 ( App. 
Div 1957). Loss of standing crops are paid directly 
under N.J.S.A. 20:3-29.1. 
29
(7) Loss or Denial of Access NOT Compensable unless there is a 
showing that Remaining Access is Unreasonable as a Matter of Law: 
See State by Commissioner of Transp. V. National Amusements, 244 
N.J. Super. 219 (App. Div 1990), certif. den. 127 N.J. 327 (1991). 
◦ Damages Attributable to general circuitry of travel, diversion of traffic 
by Highway Change or erection of a Barrier are not Compensable: 
State v. Monmouth Hills, Inc., 140 N.J. Super. 449 (App. Div 1970), 
certif. den. 57 N.J. 133 (1970). 
◦ Revocation or Modification of Access under Access code: N.J.S.A. 
27:7-92 et seq. does not result in severance damages since it is 
pursuant to police power; administrative remedies should be pursued 
instead: See State by Comm’r of Transp. v. Nordquist, (App Div) 
unpublished. 
◦ But see, State by Comm’r of Transp. v. Van Nortwick, 287 N.J. 
Super. 59 (App. Div. 1995) 
30
 Condemnees are obligated to bring before the Court any 
Objections to the Maps, Descriptions or the Parameters 
of the Taking as well as what Constitutes the Remainder 
or the Nature and extent of Property Rights existing in 
the before condition prior to Appointment of 
Commissioners; Such issues are not to be raised before 
the finder of fact; e.g. Commissioners or subsequently 
by the jury: State by Commissioner of Transp v. 
Orenstein, 124 N.J. Super. 295 (App. Div. 1973), certif.. 
den. 63 N.J 588 (1973). 
31
 Must raise all defenses to the right to take and 
manner of exercise of the power of eminent 
domain. 
 Failure to deny the authority of the condemnor 
to condemn in the manner provided for by the 
rules constitutes a waiver of the defense. 
 All issues other than those related to value and 
damages must be determined by the court prior 
to the appointment of commissioners. 
32
 Must demand a jury trial if one is desired. 
 Must be served and filed in accordance with the 
Rules or pursuant to Order to Show Cause 
 Non-contesting appearance may be filed in lieu 
of answer; valuation issues preserved. N.J.S.A. 
20:3-12(c). 
33
 When the authority to condemn is denied, all further 
steps in the action are stayed until the issue of the right 
to take has been finally determined. 
 Does “finally determined" mean exhaustion of the 
appellate process if appellate review is sought? 
◦ N.J.S.A. 20:3-11 
◦ Bridgewater Tp. v. Yarnell, 64 N.J. 211 (1974) 
◦ County of Sussex v. Merrill Lynch, 351 N.J. Super 1 (App. Div. 2002) 
 There is no discovery on the issue of the right to 
condemn except by leave of court. N.J.S.A. 20:3-12(d). 
34
 No public purpose – bad faith, pretext 
 Lack of necessity 
 Failure to pass requisite authorizations 
 Indefinite description 
 Failure to engage in bona fide negotiations. 
N.J.S.A. 20:3-6 
35
 Condemnor’s Procedural 
and Substantive 
Compliance with Eminent 
Domain Act 
 Hearing may be required 
* R. 4:67-5; R. 4:73-1 
* Bergen County v. 
Hackensack, 39 N.J. 377 
(1963) 
36
 Final Judgment as 
to Right to Take and 
Due Exercise of 
Power 
 Appoints 3 
Commissioners 
 Jurisdiction now 
with Commissioners 
 Appealable as of right 
 Stay of further 
proceedings upon 
appeal? 
37
 The amount of the initial deposit may not be less than 
the amount of the prelitigation offer N.J.S.A.20:3-18 
which itself may not be less than the amount of the 
condemnor's approved appraisal. 
 Deposits into Superior Court are by administered by the 
Clerk of Superior Court, Trust Fund Unit, which holds the 
funds in an interest-bearing account. 
38
 By motion and petition 
 Request for dismissal of other defendants 
 Processing withdrawal from Trust Funds Unit 
 Condemnor’s ability to preserve portion of deposit 
for site remediation 
 Consideration of possession issues 
39
 Valuation (Appraisal) 
 Commissioner’s Hearing Procedure 
 Jury or Bench Trial – de novo 
40
 Willing buyer & seller 
 Neither being under a compulsion to act 
 Being fully informed of all facts and circumstances 
about the acquired property (even if not known on 
date of value) 
41
 Owner is not limited to value for the use to which 
property is currently being put - owner entitled to 
value for highest and best use. State v. Caoili, 135 
N.J. 252 (1994) 
42
 HBU must be: 
Physically Possible 
Legally Permissible 
Financially Feasible 
Maximally Productive 
43
 Sales Comparison or Market Data Approach 
 Cost Approach 
 Income Approach 
44
 Based on sales of similar or “comparable” 
properties 
◦ Units of comparison 
◦ Sales distinguished from: 
 Offers or Listings 
 Options 
 Contracts 
45
 Based on cost of reproduction less depreciation 
◦ Not “replacement value” 
 Entrepreneurial Cost 
46
 Based on conversion of income and capitalization 
into property value 
 Actual vs. Economic Income 
◦ Comparable leases 
 Expenses 
 Capitalization rate 
47
48 
•Just compensation determined by “fair 
market value” of the property as of the 
date of value
49 
• Before and After method 
value of entire parcel before taking 
– value of remainder after taking = just 
compensation 
• Per Se method 
value of land taken + diminution in value (or 
damages) to remainder = just compensation
50 
• of “all material facts and circumstances – both 
past and prospective – that would influence a 
buyer or seller interested in consummating a 
sale of the property” 
State of New Jersey by Commissioner of Transportation v. Silver, 92 N.J. 507 (1983) 
Village of South Orange v. Alden Corporation, 71 N.J. 363 (1976) 
State of New Jersey by Commissioner of Transportation v. Weiswasser, 149 N.J. 320 
(1997)
 In order to obtain severance damages (from 
taking a non-contiguous parcel) landowner must 
show that remaining parcel and parcel taken were 
parts of a single economic use and under the 
same ownership. 
Housing Authority, City of Newark v. Norfolk Realty Co., 71 N.J. 314 (1976) 
51
3 Basic Rules: 
 Evidence of cost of restoring remaining property 
can be no greater than decrease in marked value 
if left uncured 
 Cannot be speculative (reasonable and certain – 
previously written existing boundaries of tract) 
 Duty to mitigate by condemnee 
State of New Jersey v. Sun Oil, 160 N.J.Super. 513 (Law Div. 1978) 
State of New Jersey by Commissioner of Transportation v. Weiswasser, 149 N.J. 320 
(1997) 
52
 Non-binding arbitration 
 Provide reports 15 days in advance 
 Obtain Award, File Appeal 
 No appearance = no right to appeal 
* Borough of Keyport v. Maropakis, 332 N.J. Super. 210 
(App. Div. 2000) 
53
 File within 20 days of service of award 
 May be relaxed up to 30 days for good cause 
 Non-relaxable thereafter 
 Party may not rely on appeal filed by adversary - 
Adversary may withdraw 
* City of Long Branch v. Spanos, A-2936-04T1, 2006 W.L. 
1627977 (App. Div. 2006) 
54
 Condemnor proceeds first 
 No burden of proof 
 Condemnation trial is an "evidential construction 
of a hypothetical sale" 
wide discretion in admission and rejection of 
evidence 
 Jury view of condemned property. R.4:73-7 
55
 Usual appellate rules apply 
56
 Appreciation of Constitutional Magnitude of Issues 
 Careful Attention to Procedural Details 
 Careful Attention to Substantive Details 
 Appraisal familiarity 
57
 Condemnor may insert in Complaint full reservation of 
rights with respect to contamination, solid waste, known 
or unknown; 
 Future cost recovery actions by a condemnor or related 
party Will NOT be barred by and doctrines of preclusion; 
e.g. Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel, or Entire 
Controversy Doctrine. 
 Eminent Domain Act does not mandate a condemnor to 
conduct a full environmental assessment, but only 
requires to disclose what is known at the time. 
 New Jersey Transit Corporation v. Cat in The Hat, 
L.L.C., 177 N.J. 29 (2003). 
58
 Environmental Costs cannot be Deducted from Fair 
Market Value; Property is to be valued as if 
“Remediated”. 
 Estimated Cost of Remediation May be Withheld by the 
Court and Remain on Deposit Pending Filing of a 
Separate Cost Recovery since it is a “Transactional 
Cost’. 
 Trial Court Hearing may be Held to Determine 
Appropriate Amount to Withhold on Deposit. 
 In Appraising Properties as Remediated, Stigma by 
reason of the Remediated State of the Property can be 
Considered; recommended to have market support 
thereof. 
 Housing Authority of the City of New Brunswick v. 
Suydam, 177 N.J. 2 (2003). 
59
 Effect upon Highest and Best Use: 
◦ In order to develop property to H & B Use, further 
remediation may have to be conducted; this may in 
turn present additional extraordinary costs over and 
above those which may be incurred compared to a 
property not needing additional or no further 
remediation. 
◦ Cost of further Remediation may not be cost effective 
and thereby limit H & B Use of property. 
◦ Stigma may have impact upon marketability of 
property or otherwise impact H & B Use of Property. 
60
• Uniformity 
• Equality 
• Provide benefits variety of events, including non-condemnation events 
• All qualified occupants are entitled to relocation assistance, including 
tenants, owners, relatives, family members and other qualified 
occupants. 
• Require relocation plan (WRAP) prior to acquisitions and relocations.
62 
 N.J.S.A. 20:4-1 (Relocation Assistance Act) 
◦ The regulations promulgated pursuant to N.J.S.A. 20:4-1, et seq., are 
found at N.J.A.C. 5:11-1.1, et seq. 
 N.J.S.A. 52:31B-1, et seq. (Relocation Assistance Law of 1967) 
◦ The regulations promulgated under N.J.S.A. 27:7-72, et seq., are found 
at N.J.A.C. 16:6-1.1, et seq. 
 N.J.S.A. 27:7-72, et seq. (Uniform Transportation Replacement Housing & 
Relocation Act). 
 42 U.S.C.A. §4601, et seq. (Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real 
Property Acquisition Polices Act of 1970).
63 
 Condemnors must assist the relocatee in finding a new location or 
dwelling before any attempt at displacement or eviction of the displaced 
person may occur. N.J.S.A. 20:4-7; N.J.S.A. 27:7-78; N.J.A.C. 16:6- 
1.3(a); N.J.A.C. 5:11-2.1 and 2.2. 
 Workable Relocation Assistance Plan (“WRAP”) 
Determine the needs of displacees; 
Assist displacees in obtaining replacement housing and business locations; 
Secure the coordination of relocation activities with other displacing agencies; 
Assist in minimizing hardships to displacees; 
Determine the extent of the need of each displacee for relocation assistance; 
Assure the availability of decent, safe, and sanitary housing; 
Determine the source, amount and availability of funds necessary to complete 
relocation; and 
Provide any other information deemed necessary to insure the regulatory 
provisions are carried out.
64 
Residential RReellooccaattiioonn 
PPaayymmeennttss  N.J.A.C. 5:11-3.2: Either the actual reasonable moving expenses incurred or a fixed payment 
based on the number of rooms in the unit, not to exceed $300.00, and a $200.00 dislocation 
allowance. 
 Moving expenses shall not be considered unreasonable due to distance if the distance is 50 
miles or less. For good cause, a move of more than 50 miles may be deemed reasonable by the 
displacing agency. See also, N.JS.A. 20-4-4. 
 N.J.A.C. 16:6-2.1: Any displaced owner/occupant or tenant of a dwelling who qualifies is entitled 
to payment of his or her actual moving and related expenses, as the agency determines to be 
reasonable and necessary, including expenses for: 
◦ Packing, crating, unpacking and uncrating of the personal property; 
◦ Disconnecting, dismantling, removing, reassembling and reinstalling relocated household appliances, and 
other personal property; 
◦ Storage of the personal property for a period not to exceed 12 months, unless the agency determines that a 
longer period is necessary; 
◦ Insurance for the replacement value of the property in connection with the move and necessary storage; 
◦ The replacement value of property lost, stolen or damaged in the process of moving (not due to the fault or 
negligence of the displaced person, his or her agent, or employee); where insurance covering such loss, theft 
or damages is not reasonably available; and 
◦ Other moving related expenses that are not listed as ineligible under N.J.A.C. 16:6-2.5, as the agency 
determines to be reasonable and necessary. 
◦ Rental Assistance Payments and down payment assistance. N.J.A.C. 5:11-3.5(a); N.J.A.C. 16:6-2.8; 
N.J.A.C. 5:11-3.6; N.J.A.C. 16:6-2.8(c) 
◦ Replacement housing differential payment N.J.A.C. 5:11-3.7 (not to exceed $15,000); N.J.A.C. 16:6-2.7 (not 
to exceed $22,500)
65 
BBuussiinneessss RReellooccaattiioonn 
PPaayymmeennttss  Self move agreement versus Actual and Reasonable Moving Expense 
 Payment of actual moving expenses limited to: 
 Actual reasonable and necessary cost: 
 Moving personal property up to 50 miles, unless the distance is enlarged by the displacing agency, for cause. 
 Inspection and license fees required by statute or local ordinance to permit the operation of the business at the new 
location. 
 Reconnecting utility service to machinery and equipment, including, without limitation, the cost incurred in adapting or 
converting relocation machinery or equipment to use a different type of power supply, to the extent that these services 
were required in the former location. Expenses incurred in providing utility service from the right-of-way to the building 
or improvements are excluded. 
 For physical changes in or to an existing building to which a business relocates in order to accommodate the machinery 
and equipment relocated. The amount incurred shall not exceed the fair market value of the machinery and equipment 
requiring the physical change. In the event the cost does exceed the fair market value of the machinery and 
equipment, the displacing agency shall then be responsible to pay only the fair market value. 
 The owner of a displaced business may elect to replace with a comparable item any item of personal property, including, 
without limitation, outdoor advertising displays or signs, utilized in its operation which is not to be moved. In such a case, the 
amount of the moving expense payment shall be the lesser of: 
 the actual cost of the substitute equipment delivered and installed at the new location less any proceeds form the 
disposition of the old equipment or, if a bona fide sale cannot be made, less the market value of the old equipment as 
determined by an independent appraisal; and 
 The estimated cost of relocating the old equipment, as determined by the displacing agency.
66 
Business Relocation PPaayymmeennttss 
((ccoonntt’’dd))  Self Move: 
 Must provide notice to the agency 
 Submit three estimates. 
 The amount of the moving cost payment shall be the lesser of the bid chosen or the estimate 
obtained by the displacing agency. 
 Loss of tangible personal property: 
 A displaced business that elects not to move all or a part of the personal property may 
receive a payment for actual direct loss of the personal property not moved. Must have prior 
agency approval 
 The payment for loss of tangible personal property shall be calculated as follows: 
 In the event the items is sold the payment shall be the fair market value less the net sales 
amount (sales price less cost of sale); 
 In the event the item is not sold the payment shall be the fair market value. The item shall 
then be the property of the displacing agency.
67 
Business Relocation PPaayymmeennttss ((ccoonntt..)) 
 Professional services necessary for: 
Planning the move of the personal property; 
Moving the personal property; and 
Installing the relocated personal property at the replacement 
location. 
Re-lettering signs and replacing stationery on hand at the time of 
displacement that are made obsolete as a result of the move; 
The reasonable cost incurred in attempting to sell an item 
that is not to be relocated; 
Searching for a replacement location. 
Time spent searching 
 Fees paid to a real estate agent or broker to locate a 
replacement site, exclusive of any fees or commissions related 
to the purchase of such site; and
68 
AAppppeeaallss 
 Deadlines 
◦ Regulations 
◦ Court rules 
◦ Tort Claim statute of limitations 
 Appropriate Forum 
◦ State or Federal Agency 
◦ Agency review, Administrative review, Courts
69 
CCaassee LLaaww 
 Foreign Auto Preparation Service (FAPS) vs. New Jersey Economic 
Development Authority , 201 N.J. Super. 422 (App. Div. 1995) (holding The 
displacement must be the cause of the expense for which reimbursement is 
sought, not the failure to rent comparable property.) 
 Blazer Corp. vs. NJ Sports & Exposition Authority , 195 N.J. Super. 542 
(Law Div. 1984), aff’d 199 N.J. Super. 107 (App. Div. 1985) (finding date of 
eviction important for statute of limitations to file claim). 
 In Re Berwick Ice, Inc. , 231 N.J. Super. 391 (App. Div. 1989) (holding 
appeals for relocation claims must be filed and determined by appropriate state 
or federal agency) 
 Paterson Redevelopment Agency vs. Schulman , 78 N.J. 378 (1979), 
cert. denied, 444 US 900, 100 S.Ct. 210, 62 L.Ed. 2d 136 (1979) (holding that 
that since the relocation statutes did not provide for interest on payments, no 
interest was required to be paid with respect to relocation assistance payments) 
 Jersey City School District vs. Marathon Enterprises , OAL Docket No. 
CAF 09962-00 and CAF 01465-04, aff’d Appellate Division docket No: A-6188- 
03T5 (App. Div. 2007) (finding approximately two million of claimed relocation 
expenses were reasonable and necessary in order to relocate the machinery and 
equipment, and to meet the stringent USDA requirements for meat processing 
facilities.)

More Related Content

Similar to Fundamentals of Condemnation Law NJICLE 2014

Right to Take Issues and Dilemmas
Right to Take Issues and DilemmasRight to Take Issues and Dilemmas
Right to Take Issues and Dilemmas
Anthony DellaPelle, Esq., CRE
 
Defending Against Tenant’s Warranty of Habitability Claim and Other Defenses
Defending Against Tenant’s Warranty of Habitability Claim and Other Defenses Defending Against Tenant’s Warranty of Habitability Claim and Other Defenses
Defending Against Tenant’s Warranty of Habitability Claim and Other Defenses
Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C.
 
Municipal Sales & Use Tax Collections and Enforcement
Municipal Sales & Use Tax Collections and EnforcementMunicipal Sales & Use Tax Collections and Enforcement
Municipal Sales & Use Tax Collections and Enforcement
mlbenham
 
_FINAL NJ Clinic Materials
_FINAL NJ Clinic Materials_FINAL NJ Clinic Materials
_FINAL NJ Clinic Materials
Susan Feathers
 
Martin v Beehan
Martin v BeehanMartin v Beehan
Martin v Beehan
OldLouisvilleZoning
 
Martin v Beehan
Martin v BeehanMartin v Beehan
Martin v Beehan
OldLouisvilleZoning
 
Remedial Law Rule 68 69
Remedial Law Rule 68 69Remedial Law Rule 68 69
Remedial Law Rule 68 69
Lawrence Villamar
 
Rental Housing Overview
Rental Housing OverviewRental Housing Overview
Rental Housing Overview
EGDunn
 
First Natl Acceptance Co. v. City of Utica_12-cv-01622-0[1]
First Natl Acceptance Co. v. City of Utica_12-cv-01622-0[1]First Natl Acceptance Co. v. City of Utica_12-cv-01622-0[1]
First Natl Acceptance Co. v. City of Utica_12-cv-01622-0[1]
James Evans
 
Federal Judge Rules Against Small Haulers in Waste Management Dispute
Federal Judge Rules Against Small Haulers in Waste Management DisputeFederal Judge Rules Against Small Haulers in Waste Management Dispute
Federal Judge Rules Against Small Haulers in Waste Management Dispute
This Is Reno
 
FLSA Litigation - Federal Court - MDFL Tampa - Fee Entitlement & Mootness
FLSA Litigation - Federal Court - MDFL Tampa - Fee Entitlement & MootnessFLSA Litigation - Federal Court - MDFL Tampa - Fee Entitlement & Mootness
FLSA Litigation - Federal Court - MDFL Tampa - Fee Entitlement & Mootness
Pollard PLLC
 
FL Judgment
FL JudgmentFL Judgment
FL Judgment
Brian Lum
 
Saud_Summary_Experience__2016
Saud_Summary_Experience__2016Saud_Summary_Experience__2016
Saud_Summary_Experience__2016
Saud A.H. Khokhar
 
8.+Corner+Brook+_City_+v+Bailey+2021+SCC.pdf
8.+Corner+Brook+_City_+v+Bailey+2021+SCC.pdf8.+Corner+Brook+_City_+v+Bailey+2021+SCC.pdf
8.+Corner+Brook+_City_+v+Bailey+2021+SCC.pdf
JackTucker22
 
King county-superior-court-order-on-rha-v-city-of-seattle-22421
King county-superior-court-order-on-rha-v-city-of-seattle-22421King county-superior-court-order-on-rha-v-city-of-seattle-22421
King county-superior-court-order-on-rha-v-city-of-seattle-22421
Roger Valdez
 
Registration of Documents
Registration of Documents Registration of Documents
Registration of Documents
Ajithaa Edirimane
 
547 2018 03 01 edmonton (city) v can-west corporate air charters ltd
547 2018 03 01 edmonton (city) v can-west corporate air charters ltd547 2018 03 01 edmonton (city) v can-west corporate air charters ltd
547 2018 03 01 edmonton (city) v can-west corporate air charters ltd
Paul Barrette
 
Writing Sample - PointsnAuthorities - KW
Writing Sample - PointsnAuthorities - KWWriting Sample - PointsnAuthorities - KW
Writing Sample - PointsnAuthorities - KW
Kimberley Walsh
 
NY AG Schneiderman's Petition of FERC to Investigate the Constitution Pipelin...
NY AG Schneiderman's Petition of FERC to Investigate the Constitution Pipelin...NY AG Schneiderman's Petition of FERC to Investigate the Constitution Pipelin...
NY AG Schneiderman's Petition of FERC to Investigate the Constitution Pipelin...
Marcellus Drilling News
 
Land acquisition fazal subhan dg kpja nov 2018
Land acquisition fazal subhan dg kpja nov 2018Land acquisition fazal subhan dg kpja nov 2018
Land acquisition fazal subhan dg kpja nov 2018
zulfi799
 

Similar to Fundamentals of Condemnation Law NJICLE 2014 (20)

Right to Take Issues and Dilemmas
Right to Take Issues and DilemmasRight to Take Issues and Dilemmas
Right to Take Issues and Dilemmas
 
Defending Against Tenant’s Warranty of Habitability Claim and Other Defenses
Defending Against Tenant’s Warranty of Habitability Claim and Other Defenses Defending Against Tenant’s Warranty of Habitability Claim and Other Defenses
Defending Against Tenant’s Warranty of Habitability Claim and Other Defenses
 
Municipal Sales & Use Tax Collections and Enforcement
Municipal Sales & Use Tax Collections and EnforcementMunicipal Sales & Use Tax Collections and Enforcement
Municipal Sales & Use Tax Collections and Enforcement
 
_FINAL NJ Clinic Materials
_FINAL NJ Clinic Materials_FINAL NJ Clinic Materials
_FINAL NJ Clinic Materials
 
Martin v Beehan
Martin v BeehanMartin v Beehan
Martin v Beehan
 
Martin v Beehan
Martin v BeehanMartin v Beehan
Martin v Beehan
 
Remedial Law Rule 68 69
Remedial Law Rule 68 69Remedial Law Rule 68 69
Remedial Law Rule 68 69
 
Rental Housing Overview
Rental Housing OverviewRental Housing Overview
Rental Housing Overview
 
First Natl Acceptance Co. v. City of Utica_12-cv-01622-0[1]
First Natl Acceptance Co. v. City of Utica_12-cv-01622-0[1]First Natl Acceptance Co. v. City of Utica_12-cv-01622-0[1]
First Natl Acceptance Co. v. City of Utica_12-cv-01622-0[1]
 
Federal Judge Rules Against Small Haulers in Waste Management Dispute
Federal Judge Rules Against Small Haulers in Waste Management DisputeFederal Judge Rules Against Small Haulers in Waste Management Dispute
Federal Judge Rules Against Small Haulers in Waste Management Dispute
 
FLSA Litigation - Federal Court - MDFL Tampa - Fee Entitlement & Mootness
FLSA Litigation - Federal Court - MDFL Tampa - Fee Entitlement & MootnessFLSA Litigation - Federal Court - MDFL Tampa - Fee Entitlement & Mootness
FLSA Litigation - Federal Court - MDFL Tampa - Fee Entitlement & Mootness
 
FL Judgment
FL JudgmentFL Judgment
FL Judgment
 
Saud_Summary_Experience__2016
Saud_Summary_Experience__2016Saud_Summary_Experience__2016
Saud_Summary_Experience__2016
 
8.+Corner+Brook+_City_+v+Bailey+2021+SCC.pdf
8.+Corner+Brook+_City_+v+Bailey+2021+SCC.pdf8.+Corner+Brook+_City_+v+Bailey+2021+SCC.pdf
8.+Corner+Brook+_City_+v+Bailey+2021+SCC.pdf
 
King county-superior-court-order-on-rha-v-city-of-seattle-22421
King county-superior-court-order-on-rha-v-city-of-seattle-22421King county-superior-court-order-on-rha-v-city-of-seattle-22421
King county-superior-court-order-on-rha-v-city-of-seattle-22421
 
Registration of Documents
Registration of Documents Registration of Documents
Registration of Documents
 
547 2018 03 01 edmonton (city) v can-west corporate air charters ltd
547 2018 03 01 edmonton (city) v can-west corporate air charters ltd547 2018 03 01 edmonton (city) v can-west corporate air charters ltd
547 2018 03 01 edmonton (city) v can-west corporate air charters ltd
 
Writing Sample - PointsnAuthorities - KW
Writing Sample - PointsnAuthorities - KWWriting Sample - PointsnAuthorities - KW
Writing Sample - PointsnAuthorities - KW
 
NY AG Schneiderman's Petition of FERC to Investigate the Constitution Pipelin...
NY AG Schneiderman's Petition of FERC to Investigate the Constitution Pipelin...NY AG Schneiderman's Petition of FERC to Investigate the Constitution Pipelin...
NY AG Schneiderman's Petition of FERC to Investigate the Constitution Pipelin...
 
Land acquisition fazal subhan dg kpja nov 2018
Land acquisition fazal subhan dg kpja nov 2018Land acquisition fazal subhan dg kpja nov 2018
Land acquisition fazal subhan dg kpja nov 2018
 

More from Anthony DellaPelle, Esq., CRE

New Jersey Business Leaders: Property Tax Appeals in 2021
New Jersey Business Leaders: Property Tax Appeals in 2021New Jersey Business Leaders: Property Tax Appeals in 2021
New Jersey Business Leaders: Property Tax Appeals in 2021
Anthony DellaPelle, Esq., CRE
 
The Impact of Higher Education on Real Estate Assets
The Impact of Higher Education on Real Estate AssetsThe Impact of Higher Education on Real Estate Assets
The Impact of Higher Education on Real Estate Assets
Anthony DellaPelle, Esq., CRE
 
ALI-CLE "Responding to the Abuse of Motions in Limine"; January 2020ation 2020
ALI-CLE "Responding to the Abuse of Motions in Limine"; January 2020ation 2020ALI-CLE "Responding to the Abuse of Motions in Limine"; January 2020ation 2020
ALI-CLE "Responding to the Abuse of Motions in Limine"; January 2020ation 2020
Anthony DellaPelle, Esq., CRE
 
ALI-CLE: "The Anatomy of An Appraisal"; January 2020
ALI-CLE:  "The Anatomy of An Appraisal"; January 2020ALI-CLE:  "The Anatomy of An Appraisal"; January 2020
ALI-CLE: "The Anatomy of An Appraisal"; January 2020
Anthony DellaPelle, Esq., CRE
 
Legal Ethics and Social Media
Legal Ethics and Social MediaLegal Ethics and Social Media
Legal Ethics and Social Media
Anthony DellaPelle, Esq., CRE
 
Typical Valuation Approaches and How to Deal With Them
Typical Valuation Approaches and How to Deal With ThemTypical Valuation Approaches and How to Deal With Them
Typical Valuation Approaches and How to Deal With Them
Anthony DellaPelle, Esq., CRE
 
Redevelopment is Alive and Well: How Does the Owner Stand its Ground?
Redevelopment is Alive and Well:  How Does the Owner Stand its Ground?Redevelopment is Alive and Well:  How Does the Owner Stand its Ground?
Redevelopment is Alive and Well: How Does the Owner Stand its Ground?
Anthony DellaPelle, Esq., CRE
 
Practical and Ethical Use of Social Media in Litigation
Practical and Ethical Use of Social Media in LitigationPractical and Ethical Use of Social Media in Litigation
Practical and Ethical Use of Social Media in Litigation
Anthony DellaPelle, Esq., CRE
 
Highest and Best Use as a Critical Factor in Valuation for Redevelopment Cond...
Highest and Best Use as a Critical Factor in Valuation for Redevelopment Cond...Highest and Best Use as a Critical Factor in Valuation for Redevelopment Cond...
Highest and Best Use as a Critical Factor in Valuation for Redevelopment Cond...
Anthony DellaPelle, Esq., CRE
 
Can Dead Shopping Centers be Brought Back to Life?
Can Dead Shopping Centers be Brought Back to Life?Can Dead Shopping Centers be Brought Back to Life?
Can Dead Shopping Centers be Brought Back to Life?
Anthony DellaPelle, Esq., CRE
 
Pipeline Easements and Issues
Pipeline Easements and IssuesPipeline Easements and Issues
Pipeline Easements and Issues
Anthony DellaPelle, Esq., CRE
 
New Jersey's Beach Replenishment Program
New Jersey's Beach Replenishment ProgramNew Jersey's Beach Replenishment Program
New Jersey's Beach Replenishment Program
Anthony DellaPelle, Esq., CRE
 
Eminent domain: A View of the Appraiser's Role from Both Sides
Eminent domain:  A View of the Appraiser's Role from Both SidesEminent domain:  A View of the Appraiser's Role from Both Sides
Eminent domain: A View of the Appraiser's Role from Both Sides
Anthony DellaPelle, Esq., CRE
 
ALI ABA 2011 "The 'Social' Lawyer"
ALI ABA 2011 "The 'Social' Lawyer"ALI ABA 2011 "The 'Social' Lawyer"
ALI ABA 2011 "The 'Social' Lawyer"
Anthony DellaPelle, Esq., CRE
 
Partial Takings: Proper Compensation for Owners Whose Property is Taken for ...
Partial Takings:  Proper Compensation for Owners Whose Property is Taken for ...Partial Takings:  Proper Compensation for Owners Whose Property is Taken for ...
Partial Takings: Proper Compensation for Owners Whose Property is Taken for ...
Anthony DellaPelle, Esq., CRE
 
Natural Disasters and the Law: The Aftermath of Superstorm Sandy and Its Imp...
Natural Disasters and the Law:  The Aftermath of Superstorm Sandy and Its Imp...Natural Disasters and the Law:  The Aftermath of Superstorm Sandy and Its Imp...
Natural Disasters and the Law: The Aftermath of Superstorm Sandy and Its Imp...
Anthony DellaPelle, Esq., CRE
 
New Jersey Since Kelo
New Jersey Since KeloNew Jersey Since Kelo
New Jersey Since Kelo
Anthony DellaPelle, Esq., CRE
 
Severance damages in partial takings cases 2015
Severance damages in partial takings cases 2015Severance damages in partial takings cases 2015
Severance damages in partial takings cases 2015
Anthony DellaPelle, Esq., CRE
 
Partial takings benefits and burdens bloustein lecture 11 20 14
Partial takings  benefits and burdens bloustein lecture 11 20 14Partial takings  benefits and burdens bloustein lecture 11 20 14
Partial takings benefits and burdens bloustein lecture 11 20 14
Anthony DellaPelle, Esq., CRE
 
ULI: Harrison -- North Jersey's Next Hoboken?
ULI:  Harrison -- North Jersey's Next Hoboken?ULI:  Harrison -- North Jersey's Next Hoboken?
ULI: Harrison -- North Jersey's Next Hoboken?
Anthony DellaPelle, Esq., CRE
 

More from Anthony DellaPelle, Esq., CRE (20)

New Jersey Business Leaders: Property Tax Appeals in 2021
New Jersey Business Leaders: Property Tax Appeals in 2021New Jersey Business Leaders: Property Tax Appeals in 2021
New Jersey Business Leaders: Property Tax Appeals in 2021
 
The Impact of Higher Education on Real Estate Assets
The Impact of Higher Education on Real Estate AssetsThe Impact of Higher Education on Real Estate Assets
The Impact of Higher Education on Real Estate Assets
 
ALI-CLE "Responding to the Abuse of Motions in Limine"; January 2020ation 2020
ALI-CLE "Responding to the Abuse of Motions in Limine"; January 2020ation 2020ALI-CLE "Responding to the Abuse of Motions in Limine"; January 2020ation 2020
ALI-CLE "Responding to the Abuse of Motions in Limine"; January 2020ation 2020
 
ALI-CLE: "The Anatomy of An Appraisal"; January 2020
ALI-CLE:  "The Anatomy of An Appraisal"; January 2020ALI-CLE:  "The Anatomy of An Appraisal"; January 2020
ALI-CLE: "The Anatomy of An Appraisal"; January 2020
 
Legal Ethics and Social Media
Legal Ethics and Social MediaLegal Ethics and Social Media
Legal Ethics and Social Media
 
Typical Valuation Approaches and How to Deal With Them
Typical Valuation Approaches and How to Deal With ThemTypical Valuation Approaches and How to Deal With Them
Typical Valuation Approaches and How to Deal With Them
 
Redevelopment is Alive and Well: How Does the Owner Stand its Ground?
Redevelopment is Alive and Well:  How Does the Owner Stand its Ground?Redevelopment is Alive and Well:  How Does the Owner Stand its Ground?
Redevelopment is Alive and Well: How Does the Owner Stand its Ground?
 
Practical and Ethical Use of Social Media in Litigation
Practical and Ethical Use of Social Media in LitigationPractical and Ethical Use of Social Media in Litigation
Practical and Ethical Use of Social Media in Litigation
 
Highest and Best Use as a Critical Factor in Valuation for Redevelopment Cond...
Highest and Best Use as a Critical Factor in Valuation for Redevelopment Cond...Highest and Best Use as a Critical Factor in Valuation for Redevelopment Cond...
Highest and Best Use as a Critical Factor in Valuation for Redevelopment Cond...
 
Can Dead Shopping Centers be Brought Back to Life?
Can Dead Shopping Centers be Brought Back to Life?Can Dead Shopping Centers be Brought Back to Life?
Can Dead Shopping Centers be Brought Back to Life?
 
Pipeline Easements and Issues
Pipeline Easements and IssuesPipeline Easements and Issues
Pipeline Easements and Issues
 
New Jersey's Beach Replenishment Program
New Jersey's Beach Replenishment ProgramNew Jersey's Beach Replenishment Program
New Jersey's Beach Replenishment Program
 
Eminent domain: A View of the Appraiser's Role from Both Sides
Eminent domain:  A View of the Appraiser's Role from Both SidesEminent domain:  A View of the Appraiser's Role from Both Sides
Eminent domain: A View of the Appraiser's Role from Both Sides
 
ALI ABA 2011 "The 'Social' Lawyer"
ALI ABA 2011 "The 'Social' Lawyer"ALI ABA 2011 "The 'Social' Lawyer"
ALI ABA 2011 "The 'Social' Lawyer"
 
Partial Takings: Proper Compensation for Owners Whose Property is Taken for ...
Partial Takings:  Proper Compensation for Owners Whose Property is Taken for ...Partial Takings:  Proper Compensation for Owners Whose Property is Taken for ...
Partial Takings: Proper Compensation for Owners Whose Property is Taken for ...
 
Natural Disasters and the Law: The Aftermath of Superstorm Sandy and Its Imp...
Natural Disasters and the Law:  The Aftermath of Superstorm Sandy and Its Imp...Natural Disasters and the Law:  The Aftermath of Superstorm Sandy and Its Imp...
Natural Disasters and the Law: The Aftermath of Superstorm Sandy and Its Imp...
 
New Jersey Since Kelo
New Jersey Since KeloNew Jersey Since Kelo
New Jersey Since Kelo
 
Severance damages in partial takings cases 2015
Severance damages in partial takings cases 2015Severance damages in partial takings cases 2015
Severance damages in partial takings cases 2015
 
Partial takings benefits and burdens bloustein lecture 11 20 14
Partial takings  benefits and burdens bloustein lecture 11 20 14Partial takings  benefits and burdens bloustein lecture 11 20 14
Partial takings benefits and burdens bloustein lecture 11 20 14
 
ULI: Harrison -- North Jersey's Next Hoboken?
ULI:  Harrison -- North Jersey's Next Hoboken?ULI:  Harrison -- North Jersey's Next Hoboken?
ULI: Harrison -- North Jersey's Next Hoboken?
 

Recently uploaded

Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMatthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
MattGardner52
 
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersDefending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
HarpreetSaini48
 
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
osenwakm
 
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptxReceivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Godwin Emmanuel Oyedokun MBA MSc PhD FCA FCTI FCNA CFE FFAR
 
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in ItalyThe Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
BridgeWest.eu
 
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal EnvironmentsFrom Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
ssusera97a2f
 
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptxPatenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
ssuser559494
 
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
gjsma0ep
 
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxGenocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
MasoudZamani13
 
快速办理(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书一模一样
快速办理(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书一模一样快速办理(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书一模一样
快速办理(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书一模一样
15e6o6u
 
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdfThe Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
veteranlegal
 
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdfV.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
bhavenpr
 
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at SeaSan Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
Justin Ordoyo
 
It's the Law: Recent Court and Administrative Decisions of Interest
It's the Law: Recent Court and Administrative Decisions of InterestIt's the Law: Recent Court and Administrative Decisions of Interest
It's the Law: Recent Court and Administrative Decisions of Interest
Parsons Behle & Latimer
 
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
osenwakm
 
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
CIkumparan
 
Search Warrants for NH Law Enforcement Officers
Search Warrants for NH Law Enforcement OfficersSearch Warrants for NH Law Enforcement Officers
Search Warrants for NH Law Enforcement Officers
RichardTheberge
 
Incometax Compliance_PF_ ESI- June 2024
Incometax  Compliance_PF_ ESI- June 2024Incometax  Compliance_PF_ ESI- June 2024
Incometax Compliance_PF_ ESI- June 2024
EbizfilingIndia
 
Business Laws Sunita saha
Business Laws Sunita sahaBusiness Laws Sunita saha
Business Laws Sunita saha
sunitasaha5
 
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMatthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
 
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersDefending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
 
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
 
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptxReceivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
Receivership and liquidation Accounts Prof. Oyedokun.pptx
 
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in ItalyThe Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
 
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal EnvironmentsFrom Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
 
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptxPatenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
 
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
 
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxGenocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
 
快速办理(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书一模一样
快速办理(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书一模一样快速办理(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书一模一样
快速办理(SCU毕业证书)澳洲南十字星大学毕业证文凭证书一模一样
 
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdfThe Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
 
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdfV.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
 
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at SeaSan Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflict at Sea
 
It's the Law: Recent Court and Administrative Decisions of Interest
It's the Law: Recent Court and Administrative Decisions of InterestIt's the Law: Recent Court and Administrative Decisions of Interest
It's the Law: Recent Court and Administrative Decisions of Interest
 
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
 
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
2015pmkemenhub163.pdf. 2015pmkemenhub163.pdf
 
Search Warrants for NH Law Enforcement Officers
Search Warrants for NH Law Enforcement OfficersSearch Warrants for NH Law Enforcement Officers
Search Warrants for NH Law Enforcement Officers
 
Incometax Compliance_PF_ ESI- June 2024
Incometax  Compliance_PF_ ESI- June 2024Incometax  Compliance_PF_ ESI- June 2024
Incometax Compliance_PF_ ESI- June 2024
 
Business Laws Sunita saha
Business Laws Sunita sahaBusiness Laws Sunita saha
Business Laws Sunita saha
 
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
 

Fundamentals of Condemnation Law NJICLE 2014

  • 1. New Jersey Institute for Continuing Legal Education September 23, 2014
  • 2. Anthony F. Della Pelle, Esq. , CRE (Moderator) John H. Buonocore, Jr., Esq. (McKirdy & Riskin, PA) Timothy P. Duggan, Esq. (Stark & Stark) Wanda Y. Ortiz (Deputy Attorney General, State of NJ) Maurice J. Stack, CRE (Stack, Coolahan & Stack) 2
  • 3.  Power of Eminent Domain  Just Compensation  Legal Resources  Prelitigation Issues  Litigation  Valuation and Appraisal  Non-Compensability  Environmental Issues  Relocation  Question and Answer 3
  • 4.  Constitutional and Legislative Grant of Authority  Enabling Legislation – Municipal, County, Special Agency, State and Federal Governments  Public Use Requirement  Requirement for Just Compensation 4
  • 5.  "...nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation."  U.S. Const. Amend. V  "Private property shall not be taken for public use without just compensation. Individuals or private corporations shall not be authorized to take property for public use without just compensation first made to the owners."  N.J.S.A. Const. Art. 1, Sec. 20 5
  • 6.  Compensation for the property taken  Reduction in value (damages) to any remaining property  Interest  Indemnity for loss  Attorneys’ fees and costs not generally recoverable by condemnee 6
  • 7.  Eminent Domain Act - N.J.S.A.20:3-1 et seq.  Rule 4:73 (Condemnation)  Relocation Assistance Act - N.J.S.A. 20:4-1 et seq., N.J.S.A. 27:7-72, et seq. and regulations - N.J.A.C. 5:11-1; N.J.A.C. 16:6-1.1 et seq.  Local Redevelopment and Housing Law – N.J.S.A. 40A:12A:-1, et seq. 7
  • 8. 8 21 New Jersey Practice, Skills and Methods, Eminent Domain
  • 9. 9
  • 10.  The Appraisal of Real Estate, 13th Ed. Appraisal Institute  Eaton, Real Estate Valuation in Litigation, 2d Ed., Appraisal Institute 10
  • 11.  N.J.S.A. 20:3-1 et seq.  Uniform procedure applicable to all proceedings in which the power to condemn is being exercised, except acquisitions by PANYNJ which proceed pursuant to N.J.S.A. 32:1-77, et seq.  Applies to “inverse” actions 11
  • 12.  Attempt at amicable resolution through bona fide negotiations  Final judgment on authority for and due exercise of power by condemnor  Commissioners’ Hearing  Jury Trial on appeal from Commissioners’ Report on the issue of just compensation 12
  • 13.  Fact finder is concerned with just compensation only - Court adjudicates all other issues (e.g., title, proceeds allocation)  One award representing the value of all interests in the property (“unit rule”)  Award must take into account all damages, both present and prospective - no further proceedings or relief 13
  • 14.  Real vs. Personal Property  As to real estate, “functional unit” test for “fixture” issues  Interplay between functional unit and moving expenses as relocation benefit * N.J.S.A. 20:3-2(d) * State v. Gallant, 42 N.J. 583 (1964) 14
  • 15. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 20:3-30, the earliest of the following events:  Date possession is taken by the condemnor  Complaint date  Date on which condemnor substantially affects use and enjoyment of property  Declaration of “blight” or “in need of redevelopment” determination, but see N.J.S.A. 20:3-38 * See Kirby Forest Industries v. U.S., 467 U.S. 1 (1984) 15
  • 16.  Prelitigation Entry and Inspection/Evaluation  Title Searches  Parcel Surveys  Appraisal  Environmental Inspections  Right of Entry 16
  • 17.  Notice of appraisal inspection  Written offer by certified mail  Offer not less than approved appraisal  Description of property to be acquired  Disclosure of all appraisals obtained  Minimum 14 days for reply to offer  Must address issues raised by owner 17
  • 18.  Complaint  Order to Show Cause  Declaration of Taking  Order Permitting Deposit  Notices  Answer  Judgment Appointing Commissioners 18
  • 19. Must include:  a statement showing the amount of compensation offered by the condemnor;  a reasonable disclosure of the manner in which the amount has been calculated. “Reasonable disclosure” by the condemnor includes furnishing the condemnee with:  the map  a description of land to be acquired  the identity of the improvements to be acquired, if any  a statement of the full fair market value  a description of the appraisal valuation method or methods relied upon (cont’d) 19
  • 20.  a breakdown of the appraised value allocated to the land to be acquired, and improvements to be acquired, if any; Data concerning comparable sales or leases relied upon in determining the amount of compensation offered which shall include:  names of seller and purchaser or landlord and tenant,  the location of the property by block, lot, street, street number, and municipality,  date of sale or date and duration of lease  the consideration for the sale or amount of rent  the book and page number of the recording of the deed of the comparable sale  any unusual factors concerning the property known to the condemnor which may affect value. 20
  • 21.  Join all parties with an interest in the property, e.g.: ◦ Tenants, holders of easements, occupants ◦ Mortgagees and other lien holders ◦ Municipality (for taxes)  Only those parties who are joined have their interest foreclosed by the proceedings.  Easements are to be condemned separately as a “DE” parcel together with the property which it serves; the area of the easement should be designated on the servient parcel as “SE” and the appraisal should adjust accordingly. 21
  • 22.  Action is brought in a summary manner pursuant to R.4:67.  May be presented to the court ex parte.  No summons, but language is consistent  Served within the state at least 10 days before the return date 22
  • 23.  Basically, a “deed” from the condemnor to itself  Fixes the property and rights acquired based on legal description  Recorded in County Clerk/Register’s office 23
  • 24.  Provides for deposit of estimated compensation (usually the amount of the offer per the appraisal)  May be obtained ex parte 24
  • 25.  Proof of Service of Deposit and Filing/Recording of Declaration of Taking  Notice of making of deposit into court to owner  Proof of service of such notice must be filed in the action prior to taking possession. 25
  • 26.  Provided no declaration of taking has been filed, the action may be unilaterally abandoned by the condemnor  at any time before, or within 30 days after, the filing of the award of commissioners;  or in the event of an appeal from the award, at any time before, or within 30 days after, the entry of judgment;  or in the event that a hearing before commissioners is waived, at any time before, or within 30 days after, judgment has been entered in the action. [N.J.S.A. 20:3-35]  Otherwise, condemnee must consent to abandonment  Entitlement to fees costs and expenses. N.J.S.A.20:3-26(b)  West Orange v. 769 Associates, LLC, 397 N.J. Super. 244 (App. Div. 2007) 26
  • 27. Certain Classes of Damages are not Compensable as a Matter of Law: (1) Loss of business; franchise, future or current profits, tenants or good will. State by Commissioner of Transportation v. Hess Realty Corp., 226 N.J. Super. 256 (App. Div. 1988), certif.. den. 113 N.J. 229 (1989), certif.. den. 493 U.S. 964 (1989). (2) Damages based upon use of land acquired from others; e.g. power lines of adjoining property do not constitute a compensable taking. Public Service Elec. & Gas v. Oldwick, 125 N.J. Super. 31 (App. Div. 1973), certif.. den. 64 N.J. 113 (1973) 27
  • 28. (3) Change in grade/visibility is not compensable unless it is caused by the taking itself: State, by Commr. of Transp. v. Weisswasser, 149 N.J. 320 (1997); (4) Typically noise and vibration impacts are not compensable since they tend to be speculative; in order to be compensable it must be demonstrated that there is a measurable increase in noise level and/or vibrations actually caused by taking and that they are reflected in the market place. See State by Comm’r of Transp. V. Carroll, 123 N.J. 308 (1991). 28
  • 29. (5) Upstream generated drainage is not compensable in condemnation action; only direct problems resulting from the land taken; See State by Comm’r of Transp. V. Rosenblum, 200 N.J.Super. 209 (App. Div 1985). (6) Landscaping/Sand/Gravel/Minerals/Crops are not valued separately since they are elements of land taken; must demonstrate enhancement value; See State v. Whitehead Bros. Co., 210 N.J. Super. 359 (Law Div. 1986); see also Tennessee Gas Transmission Co. v. Maze, 45 N.J. Super. 496 ( App. Div 1957). Loss of standing crops are paid directly under N.J.S.A. 20:3-29.1. 29
  • 30. (7) Loss or Denial of Access NOT Compensable unless there is a showing that Remaining Access is Unreasonable as a Matter of Law: See State by Commissioner of Transp. V. National Amusements, 244 N.J. Super. 219 (App. Div 1990), certif. den. 127 N.J. 327 (1991). ◦ Damages Attributable to general circuitry of travel, diversion of traffic by Highway Change or erection of a Barrier are not Compensable: State v. Monmouth Hills, Inc., 140 N.J. Super. 449 (App. Div 1970), certif. den. 57 N.J. 133 (1970). ◦ Revocation or Modification of Access under Access code: N.J.S.A. 27:7-92 et seq. does not result in severance damages since it is pursuant to police power; administrative remedies should be pursued instead: See State by Comm’r of Transp. v. Nordquist, (App Div) unpublished. ◦ But see, State by Comm’r of Transp. v. Van Nortwick, 287 N.J. Super. 59 (App. Div. 1995) 30
  • 31.  Condemnees are obligated to bring before the Court any Objections to the Maps, Descriptions or the Parameters of the Taking as well as what Constitutes the Remainder or the Nature and extent of Property Rights existing in the before condition prior to Appointment of Commissioners; Such issues are not to be raised before the finder of fact; e.g. Commissioners or subsequently by the jury: State by Commissioner of Transp v. Orenstein, 124 N.J. Super. 295 (App. Div. 1973), certif.. den. 63 N.J 588 (1973). 31
  • 32.  Must raise all defenses to the right to take and manner of exercise of the power of eminent domain.  Failure to deny the authority of the condemnor to condemn in the manner provided for by the rules constitutes a waiver of the defense.  All issues other than those related to value and damages must be determined by the court prior to the appointment of commissioners. 32
  • 33.  Must demand a jury trial if one is desired.  Must be served and filed in accordance with the Rules or pursuant to Order to Show Cause  Non-contesting appearance may be filed in lieu of answer; valuation issues preserved. N.J.S.A. 20:3-12(c). 33
  • 34.  When the authority to condemn is denied, all further steps in the action are stayed until the issue of the right to take has been finally determined.  Does “finally determined" mean exhaustion of the appellate process if appellate review is sought? ◦ N.J.S.A. 20:3-11 ◦ Bridgewater Tp. v. Yarnell, 64 N.J. 211 (1974) ◦ County of Sussex v. Merrill Lynch, 351 N.J. Super 1 (App. Div. 2002)  There is no discovery on the issue of the right to condemn except by leave of court. N.J.S.A. 20:3-12(d). 34
  • 35.  No public purpose – bad faith, pretext  Lack of necessity  Failure to pass requisite authorizations  Indefinite description  Failure to engage in bona fide negotiations. N.J.S.A. 20:3-6 35
  • 36.  Condemnor’s Procedural and Substantive Compliance with Eminent Domain Act  Hearing may be required * R. 4:67-5; R. 4:73-1 * Bergen County v. Hackensack, 39 N.J. 377 (1963) 36
  • 37.  Final Judgment as to Right to Take and Due Exercise of Power  Appoints 3 Commissioners  Jurisdiction now with Commissioners  Appealable as of right  Stay of further proceedings upon appeal? 37
  • 38.  The amount of the initial deposit may not be less than the amount of the prelitigation offer N.J.S.A.20:3-18 which itself may not be less than the amount of the condemnor's approved appraisal.  Deposits into Superior Court are by administered by the Clerk of Superior Court, Trust Fund Unit, which holds the funds in an interest-bearing account. 38
  • 39.  By motion and petition  Request for dismissal of other defendants  Processing withdrawal from Trust Funds Unit  Condemnor’s ability to preserve portion of deposit for site remediation  Consideration of possession issues 39
  • 40.  Valuation (Appraisal)  Commissioner’s Hearing Procedure  Jury or Bench Trial – de novo 40
  • 41.  Willing buyer & seller  Neither being under a compulsion to act  Being fully informed of all facts and circumstances about the acquired property (even if not known on date of value) 41
  • 42.  Owner is not limited to value for the use to which property is currently being put - owner entitled to value for highest and best use. State v. Caoili, 135 N.J. 252 (1994) 42
  • 43.  HBU must be: Physically Possible Legally Permissible Financially Feasible Maximally Productive 43
  • 44.  Sales Comparison or Market Data Approach  Cost Approach  Income Approach 44
  • 45.  Based on sales of similar or “comparable” properties ◦ Units of comparison ◦ Sales distinguished from:  Offers or Listings  Options  Contracts 45
  • 46.  Based on cost of reproduction less depreciation ◦ Not “replacement value”  Entrepreneurial Cost 46
  • 47.  Based on conversion of income and capitalization into property value  Actual vs. Economic Income ◦ Comparable leases  Expenses  Capitalization rate 47
  • 48. 48 •Just compensation determined by “fair market value” of the property as of the date of value
  • 49. 49 • Before and After method value of entire parcel before taking – value of remainder after taking = just compensation • Per Se method value of land taken + diminution in value (or damages) to remainder = just compensation
  • 50. 50 • of “all material facts and circumstances – both past and prospective – that would influence a buyer or seller interested in consummating a sale of the property” State of New Jersey by Commissioner of Transportation v. Silver, 92 N.J. 507 (1983) Village of South Orange v. Alden Corporation, 71 N.J. 363 (1976) State of New Jersey by Commissioner of Transportation v. Weiswasser, 149 N.J. 320 (1997)
  • 51.  In order to obtain severance damages (from taking a non-contiguous parcel) landowner must show that remaining parcel and parcel taken were parts of a single economic use and under the same ownership. Housing Authority, City of Newark v. Norfolk Realty Co., 71 N.J. 314 (1976) 51
  • 52. 3 Basic Rules:  Evidence of cost of restoring remaining property can be no greater than decrease in marked value if left uncured  Cannot be speculative (reasonable and certain – previously written existing boundaries of tract)  Duty to mitigate by condemnee State of New Jersey v. Sun Oil, 160 N.J.Super. 513 (Law Div. 1978) State of New Jersey by Commissioner of Transportation v. Weiswasser, 149 N.J. 320 (1997) 52
  • 53.  Non-binding arbitration  Provide reports 15 days in advance  Obtain Award, File Appeal  No appearance = no right to appeal * Borough of Keyport v. Maropakis, 332 N.J. Super. 210 (App. Div. 2000) 53
  • 54.  File within 20 days of service of award  May be relaxed up to 30 days for good cause  Non-relaxable thereafter  Party may not rely on appeal filed by adversary - Adversary may withdraw * City of Long Branch v. Spanos, A-2936-04T1, 2006 W.L. 1627977 (App. Div. 2006) 54
  • 55.  Condemnor proceeds first  No burden of proof  Condemnation trial is an "evidential construction of a hypothetical sale" wide discretion in admission and rejection of evidence  Jury view of condemned property. R.4:73-7 55
  • 56.  Usual appellate rules apply 56
  • 57.  Appreciation of Constitutional Magnitude of Issues  Careful Attention to Procedural Details  Careful Attention to Substantive Details  Appraisal familiarity 57
  • 58.  Condemnor may insert in Complaint full reservation of rights with respect to contamination, solid waste, known or unknown;  Future cost recovery actions by a condemnor or related party Will NOT be barred by and doctrines of preclusion; e.g. Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel, or Entire Controversy Doctrine.  Eminent Domain Act does not mandate a condemnor to conduct a full environmental assessment, but only requires to disclose what is known at the time.  New Jersey Transit Corporation v. Cat in The Hat, L.L.C., 177 N.J. 29 (2003). 58
  • 59.  Environmental Costs cannot be Deducted from Fair Market Value; Property is to be valued as if “Remediated”.  Estimated Cost of Remediation May be Withheld by the Court and Remain on Deposit Pending Filing of a Separate Cost Recovery since it is a “Transactional Cost’.  Trial Court Hearing may be Held to Determine Appropriate Amount to Withhold on Deposit.  In Appraising Properties as Remediated, Stigma by reason of the Remediated State of the Property can be Considered; recommended to have market support thereof.  Housing Authority of the City of New Brunswick v. Suydam, 177 N.J. 2 (2003). 59
  • 60.  Effect upon Highest and Best Use: ◦ In order to develop property to H & B Use, further remediation may have to be conducted; this may in turn present additional extraordinary costs over and above those which may be incurred compared to a property not needing additional or no further remediation. ◦ Cost of further Remediation may not be cost effective and thereby limit H & B Use of property. ◦ Stigma may have impact upon marketability of property or otherwise impact H & B Use of Property. 60
  • 61. • Uniformity • Equality • Provide benefits variety of events, including non-condemnation events • All qualified occupants are entitled to relocation assistance, including tenants, owners, relatives, family members and other qualified occupants. • Require relocation plan (WRAP) prior to acquisitions and relocations.
  • 62. 62  N.J.S.A. 20:4-1 (Relocation Assistance Act) ◦ The regulations promulgated pursuant to N.J.S.A. 20:4-1, et seq., are found at N.J.A.C. 5:11-1.1, et seq.  N.J.S.A. 52:31B-1, et seq. (Relocation Assistance Law of 1967) ◦ The regulations promulgated under N.J.S.A. 27:7-72, et seq., are found at N.J.A.C. 16:6-1.1, et seq.  N.J.S.A. 27:7-72, et seq. (Uniform Transportation Replacement Housing & Relocation Act).  42 U.S.C.A. §4601, et seq. (Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Polices Act of 1970).
  • 63. 63  Condemnors must assist the relocatee in finding a new location or dwelling before any attempt at displacement or eviction of the displaced person may occur. N.J.S.A. 20:4-7; N.J.S.A. 27:7-78; N.J.A.C. 16:6- 1.3(a); N.J.A.C. 5:11-2.1 and 2.2.  Workable Relocation Assistance Plan (“WRAP”) Determine the needs of displacees; Assist displacees in obtaining replacement housing and business locations; Secure the coordination of relocation activities with other displacing agencies; Assist in minimizing hardships to displacees; Determine the extent of the need of each displacee for relocation assistance; Assure the availability of decent, safe, and sanitary housing; Determine the source, amount and availability of funds necessary to complete relocation; and Provide any other information deemed necessary to insure the regulatory provisions are carried out.
  • 64. 64 Residential RReellooccaattiioonn PPaayymmeennttss  N.J.A.C. 5:11-3.2: Either the actual reasonable moving expenses incurred or a fixed payment based on the number of rooms in the unit, not to exceed $300.00, and a $200.00 dislocation allowance.  Moving expenses shall not be considered unreasonable due to distance if the distance is 50 miles or less. For good cause, a move of more than 50 miles may be deemed reasonable by the displacing agency. See also, N.JS.A. 20-4-4.  N.J.A.C. 16:6-2.1: Any displaced owner/occupant or tenant of a dwelling who qualifies is entitled to payment of his or her actual moving and related expenses, as the agency determines to be reasonable and necessary, including expenses for: ◦ Packing, crating, unpacking and uncrating of the personal property; ◦ Disconnecting, dismantling, removing, reassembling and reinstalling relocated household appliances, and other personal property; ◦ Storage of the personal property for a period not to exceed 12 months, unless the agency determines that a longer period is necessary; ◦ Insurance for the replacement value of the property in connection with the move and necessary storage; ◦ The replacement value of property lost, stolen or damaged in the process of moving (not due to the fault or negligence of the displaced person, his or her agent, or employee); where insurance covering such loss, theft or damages is not reasonably available; and ◦ Other moving related expenses that are not listed as ineligible under N.J.A.C. 16:6-2.5, as the agency determines to be reasonable and necessary. ◦ Rental Assistance Payments and down payment assistance. N.J.A.C. 5:11-3.5(a); N.J.A.C. 16:6-2.8; N.J.A.C. 5:11-3.6; N.J.A.C. 16:6-2.8(c) ◦ Replacement housing differential payment N.J.A.C. 5:11-3.7 (not to exceed $15,000); N.J.A.C. 16:6-2.7 (not to exceed $22,500)
  • 65. 65 BBuussiinneessss RReellooccaattiioonn PPaayymmeennttss  Self move agreement versus Actual and Reasonable Moving Expense  Payment of actual moving expenses limited to:  Actual reasonable and necessary cost:  Moving personal property up to 50 miles, unless the distance is enlarged by the displacing agency, for cause.  Inspection and license fees required by statute or local ordinance to permit the operation of the business at the new location.  Reconnecting utility service to machinery and equipment, including, without limitation, the cost incurred in adapting or converting relocation machinery or equipment to use a different type of power supply, to the extent that these services were required in the former location. Expenses incurred in providing utility service from the right-of-way to the building or improvements are excluded.  For physical changes in or to an existing building to which a business relocates in order to accommodate the machinery and equipment relocated. The amount incurred shall not exceed the fair market value of the machinery and equipment requiring the physical change. In the event the cost does exceed the fair market value of the machinery and equipment, the displacing agency shall then be responsible to pay only the fair market value.  The owner of a displaced business may elect to replace with a comparable item any item of personal property, including, without limitation, outdoor advertising displays or signs, utilized in its operation which is not to be moved. In such a case, the amount of the moving expense payment shall be the lesser of:  the actual cost of the substitute equipment delivered and installed at the new location less any proceeds form the disposition of the old equipment or, if a bona fide sale cannot be made, less the market value of the old equipment as determined by an independent appraisal; and  The estimated cost of relocating the old equipment, as determined by the displacing agency.
  • 66. 66 Business Relocation PPaayymmeennttss ((ccoonntt’’dd))  Self Move:  Must provide notice to the agency  Submit three estimates.  The amount of the moving cost payment shall be the lesser of the bid chosen or the estimate obtained by the displacing agency.  Loss of tangible personal property:  A displaced business that elects not to move all or a part of the personal property may receive a payment for actual direct loss of the personal property not moved. Must have prior agency approval  The payment for loss of tangible personal property shall be calculated as follows:  In the event the items is sold the payment shall be the fair market value less the net sales amount (sales price less cost of sale);  In the event the item is not sold the payment shall be the fair market value. The item shall then be the property of the displacing agency.
  • 67. 67 Business Relocation PPaayymmeennttss ((ccoonntt..))  Professional services necessary for: Planning the move of the personal property; Moving the personal property; and Installing the relocated personal property at the replacement location. Re-lettering signs and replacing stationery on hand at the time of displacement that are made obsolete as a result of the move; The reasonable cost incurred in attempting to sell an item that is not to be relocated; Searching for a replacement location. Time spent searching  Fees paid to a real estate agent or broker to locate a replacement site, exclusive of any fees or commissions related to the purchase of such site; and
  • 68. 68 AAppppeeaallss  Deadlines ◦ Regulations ◦ Court rules ◦ Tort Claim statute of limitations  Appropriate Forum ◦ State or Federal Agency ◦ Agency review, Administrative review, Courts
  • 69. 69 CCaassee LLaaww  Foreign Auto Preparation Service (FAPS) vs. New Jersey Economic Development Authority , 201 N.J. Super. 422 (App. Div. 1995) (holding The displacement must be the cause of the expense for which reimbursement is sought, not the failure to rent comparable property.)  Blazer Corp. vs. NJ Sports & Exposition Authority , 195 N.J. Super. 542 (Law Div. 1984), aff’d 199 N.J. Super. 107 (App. Div. 1985) (finding date of eviction important for statute of limitations to file claim).  In Re Berwick Ice, Inc. , 231 N.J. Super. 391 (App. Div. 1989) (holding appeals for relocation claims must be filed and determined by appropriate state or federal agency)  Paterson Redevelopment Agency vs. Schulman , 78 N.J. 378 (1979), cert. denied, 444 US 900, 100 S.Ct. 210, 62 L.Ed. 2d 136 (1979) (holding that that since the relocation statutes did not provide for interest on payments, no interest was required to be paid with respect to relocation assistance payments)  Jersey City School District vs. Marathon Enterprises , OAL Docket No. CAF 09962-00 and CAF 01465-04, aff’d Appellate Division docket No: A-6188- 03T5 (App. Div. 2007) (finding approximately two million of claimed relocation expenses were reasonable and necessary in order to relocate the machinery and equipment, and to meet the stringent USDA requirements for meat processing facilities.)

Editor's Notes

  1. Redevelopment Law issues Atlantic City - casino issues Wide discretion
  2. N.J.S.A. 20:3-11 State v. Orenstein, 124 N.J. Super. 295 (App. Div.), certif.. denied 63 N.J. 588 (1973)
  3. Trenton v. Lenzner, 16 N.J. 465 (1954)(parking facility for proprietary use) West Orange v. 769 Associates, 172 N.J. 564 (2002)(roadway primarily serving residential development) Texas Eastern v. Wildlife Preserves, 48 N.J. 261 (1967)(necessity) Hillsborough v. Robertson, 260 N.J.Super. 37 (Law Div. 1992) Essex Fells v. Kessler, 289 N.J. Super 329 (Law Div. 1995)
  4. N.J.S.A. 20:3-2(j) – appealable as of right
  5. NJSA 20:3-19 re possession
  6. State v. Shein, 283 N.J.Super 588 (App. Div. 1995)
  7. State v. Gorga, 26 N.J. 113 (1958)
  8. R. 4:73-6
  9. Paterson v. Bienstock, 123 NJSuper 457 (App.Div. 1973)(no burden of proof)