This document summarizes a seminar on eminent domain held by the New Jersey Institute for Continuing Legal Education on September 23, 2014. It discusses topics like the power of eminent domain, just compensation, prelitigation issues, litigation procedures, valuation, non-compensable damages, environmental issues, and relocation. It provides an overview of the relevant laws, precedents, and process involved in eminent domain cases in New Jersey.
This document outlines the process and key considerations for eminent domain cases in New Jersey. It discusses the four main steps: negotiations, determining authority and due process, commissioners' hearing, and potential jury trial. Key topics covered include calculating just compensation, what constitutes property, date of value, prelitigation requirements, defenses to the taking, and litigation procedures. The goal is to provide an overview of the eminent domain process from start to finish.
This document provides an outline for a course on eminent domain and condemnation law. It covers topics such as the eminent domain process, calculating just compensation, trial practice and strategy, and legal resources. Key points include the constitutional and legislative authority for eminent domain, the requirement that takings be for public use and with just compensation, methods for determining property value, and defenses to the government's right to take property.
The document discusses eminent domain law and procedures. It provides biographical information about Anthony DellaPelle, an eminent domain attorney. It then covers topics such as the constitutional basis for eminent domain, the requirement that takings be for public use, that just compensation be provided, and the condemnation process which involves negotiations, commissioners' hearings, and the right to appeal determinations of just compensation.
Sample notice of voluntary dismissal under Rule 41 in United States District ...LegalDocsPro
This sample notice of voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) in United States District Court can be used a by a plaintiff to dismiss their case before a defendant has filed an answer or motion for summary judgment. The sample includes brief instructions and a proof of service. The author is an entrepreneur and freelance paralegal that has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided.
The court affirmed the lower court's denial of Tanya Smith's request for a preliminary injunction against Nolan Brumfield. Smith purchased Brumfield's property in New Orleans at a tax sale after he failed to pay taxes, but Brumfield redeemed the property during the redemption period. Smith sought to bar Brumfield from the property until reimbursed for repairs she made, but the court found she failed to prove irreparable harm or likelihood of success on the merits, as required for a preliminary injunction.
The Court of Appeals affirms the lower court's granting of summary judgment to CitiMortgage in a foreclosure action. Maria Potvin argued she was entitled to relief under the Home Affordable Modification Program and that foreclosure was inequitable, but the court found the mediation was non-binding and she did not sign the modification agreement or make payments. The court also found the affidavit from CitiMortgage in support of summary judgment met evidentiary rules for records of regularly conducted business activities. Therefore, the appeals court denied all of Potvin's assignments of error and upheld the foreclosure.
Summary of key issues presented in an eminent domain taking of a portion of real property. Presented to the American Law Institute's Condemnation 101 Continuing Education Conference in New Orleans in January, 2014
This document outlines the process and key considerations for eminent domain cases in New Jersey. It discusses the four main steps: negotiations, determining authority and due process, commissioners' hearing, and potential jury trial. Key topics covered include calculating just compensation, what constitutes property, date of value, prelitigation requirements, defenses to the taking, and litigation procedures. The goal is to provide an overview of the eminent domain process from start to finish.
This document provides an outline for a course on eminent domain and condemnation law. It covers topics such as the eminent domain process, calculating just compensation, trial practice and strategy, and legal resources. Key points include the constitutional and legislative authority for eminent domain, the requirement that takings be for public use and with just compensation, methods for determining property value, and defenses to the government's right to take property.
The document discusses eminent domain law and procedures. It provides biographical information about Anthony DellaPelle, an eminent domain attorney. It then covers topics such as the constitutional basis for eminent domain, the requirement that takings be for public use, that just compensation be provided, and the condemnation process which involves negotiations, commissioners' hearings, and the right to appeal determinations of just compensation.
Sample notice of voluntary dismissal under Rule 41 in United States District ...LegalDocsPro
This sample notice of voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) in United States District Court can be used a by a plaintiff to dismiss their case before a defendant has filed an answer or motion for summary judgment. The sample includes brief instructions and a proof of service. The author is an entrepreneur and freelance paralegal that has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided.
The court affirmed the lower court's denial of Tanya Smith's request for a preliminary injunction against Nolan Brumfield. Smith purchased Brumfield's property in New Orleans at a tax sale after he failed to pay taxes, but Brumfield redeemed the property during the redemption period. Smith sought to bar Brumfield from the property until reimbursed for repairs she made, but the court found she failed to prove irreparable harm or likelihood of success on the merits, as required for a preliminary injunction.
The Court of Appeals affirms the lower court's granting of summary judgment to CitiMortgage in a foreclosure action. Maria Potvin argued she was entitled to relief under the Home Affordable Modification Program and that foreclosure was inequitable, but the court found the mediation was non-binding and she did not sign the modification agreement or make payments. The court also found the affidavit from CitiMortgage in support of summary judgment met evidentiary rules for records of regularly conducted business activities. Therefore, the appeals court denied all of Potvin's assignments of error and upheld the foreclosure.
Summary of key issues presented in an eminent domain taking of a portion of real property. Presented to the American Law Institute's Condemnation 101 Continuing Education Conference in New Orleans in January, 2014
The document discusses eminent domain law and procedures. It provides biographical information about Anthony DellaPelle, an eminent domain attorney. It then covers topics such as the constitutional basis for eminent domain, the requirement that takings be for public use, that just compensation be provided, and the condemnation process including negotiations, commissioners' hearings, and trials. It discusses issues related to determining authority to condemn, defenses to condemnation, and impacts of the Harvey Cedars v. Karan Supreme Court decision.
Defending Against Tenant’s Warranty of Habitability Claim and Other Defenses Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C.
The document discusses various defenses that can be used against a tenant's claim for a rent abatement due to a landlord breaching the warranty of habitability. It outlines 11 defenses including the tenant failing to provide access to make repairs, electing other remedies like a rent reduction from the housing authority, and failing to notify the landlord of issues. It also notes that abatements do not apply to personal property damage, conditions caused by the tenant, or non-residential leases. Landlords cannot defend against abatement claims by arguing they are a special entity like a city or co-op. The document provides case examples to illustrate different defenses.
Municipal Sales & Use Tax Collections and Enforcementmlbenham
This document discusses various methods for collecting unpaid utility bills and taxes. It outlines Colorado statutes regarding collection of delinquent utility charges and the options municipalities have to certify unpaid charges to the county for collection as taxes. The document also discusses tax liens, collection actions, dealing with problem accounts in bankruptcy, and foreclosure proceedings. Collection of sales and use tax is discussed, including audit programs, taxpayer confidentiality, dispute resolution processes, and methods for enforcing collection such as tax liens and distraint and sale.
The document summarizes New Jersey statutes and court rules related to landlord-tenant law and eviction proceedings. It discusses when a landlord can file to transfer an eviction case from a Special Civil Part court to a Law Division court, rebuttable presumptions against landlord retaliation, and grounds for a tenant to obtain a judgment if an eviction is filed for retaliatory reasons. It also covers stays of eviction warrants and when a court must issue a warrant for possession. The document provides an overview of New Jersey laws governing landlord-tenant disputes and eviction cases.
This case involves a dispute over whether a hotel property's nonconforming use status under zoning laws had been abandoned. The local board of adjustments found that the long-disused hotel's nonconforming use as a hotel had not been abandoned because the owners had attempted to sell the property as a hotel. However, the circuit court reversed, finding abandonment had occurred. The appellate court affirmed, finding that while the sale attempt rebutted the presumption of abandonment from the long disuse, the overall record compelled a finding that the owners intended to abandon the nonconforming use.
This case involves a dispute over whether a nonconforming hotel use was abandoned under the city's zoning ordinance. The owners wanted to convert the hotel into offices. A neighbor argued the hotel use was abandoned due to years of non-use. The board found no abandonment since the owners tried to sell the property as a hotel. The court reversed, finding the record showed an intent to discontinue the hotel use based on years of non-use and no explanation for it. The appellate court affirmed, as the record did not show efforts to continue the hotel use or find an acceptable substitute use during the long period of non-use.
This document summarizes the key aspects and procedures regarding Rule 68 on the foreclosure of real estate mortgages and Rule 69 on partition under the Rules of Court. It discusses the two types of foreclosure, where to file actions, who can be defendants, prescription periods, and effects of foreclosure sales. It also outlines the two stages of a partition action, when commissioners may be appointed, and duties of commissioners in partitioning property.
This document provides an overview of Washington rental housing law. It discusses the various rules and statutes that govern landlord-tenant relationships, including federal, state, and local laws. It outlines the key rights and responsibilities of both landlords and tenants. It also summarizes the legal processes for tenant screening, lease termination, eviction, and discrimination complaints.
First Natl Acceptance Co. v. City of Utica_12-cv-01622-0[1]James Evans
This case concerns the demolition of an apartment building owned by John Gosnell in Utica, New York. First National Acceptance Company held a mortgage on the property. The City of Utica inspected the building and issued notices of violations to Gosnell, but did not notify First National or follow certain statutory procedures. First National claims the demolition violated its due process rights. The court will determine if issues of material fact exist regarding whether Utica followed applicable laws in declaring the building unsafe and ordering its demolition.
Federal Judge Rules Against Small Haulers in Waste Management DisputeThis Is Reno
Reno's small waste haulers were dealt a blow this week in their ongoing dispute against the City of Reno and Waste Management. Green Solutions Recycling filed suit against the city and Reno Disposal (Waste Management) over the city's enforcement of its franchise agreement with Waste Management.
FLSA Litigation - Federal Court - MDFL Tampa - Fee Entitlement & MootnessPollard PLLC
Lawyers in FLSA cases and particularly on the defense side should view this as a cautionary tale: Tendering a check for the wages at issue does not moot the plaintiff's claim. FLSA claims are live until there is a judgment or a settlement approved by the court. And plaintiffs DO get their fees for litigating over the issue of attorneys' fees.
Simply put: A legitimate FLSA case, a skilled attorney on the plaintiff side, and defense counsel who do not understand the applicable legal framework make for disastrous results.
This document is a stipulation and order modifying a previous judgment in a divorce case between Gary W. XXXXXX and Barbara K. XXXXXX. It stipulates that (1) Barbara will receive $84,659 from Gary's 401(k) plan, ownership of their Florida condo, funds from rental and personal bank accounts, and levies against Gary's accounts; (2) these transfers settle all child and spousal support claims; (3) the 401(k) transfer is non-taxable; (4) Gary's additional child and spousal support obligations are deemed satisfied; and (5) enforcement actions against Gary will be terminated upon execution of this order.
Saud A.H. Khokhar has over 30 years of experience providing legal research, writing, and document preparation services under attorney supervision. He has expertise in areas such as real estate, foreclosure, bankruptcy, matrimonial law, immigration, and landlord/tenant law. Saud has also drafted appeals and legal filings in numerous representative court cases. He holds a Bachelor's degree from Pace University and certificates in internet technology and real estate. Saud is also a licensed real estate broker, mortgage broker, insurance broker, and notary public.
This Supreme Court of Canada case involves the interpretation of a release agreement between Mary Bailey and the City of Corner Brook. Bailey had been involved in a car accident where she struck a city employee, David Temple, who then sued Bailey. Bailey and the city entered into a settlement agreement and release regarding Bailey's separate lawsuit against the city. However, Bailey later filed a third-party claim against the city in Temple's lawsuit against her. The city argued the release barred this third-party claim. The court had to determine whether there was a special rule for interpreting releases and whether the application judge erred in his broad interpretation of the release to include Bailey's third-party claim.
King county-superior-court-order-on-rha-v-city-of-seattle-22421Roger Valdez
This order denies the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and grants the defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment. It finds that the three Seattle ordinances establishing defenses to eviction due to financial hardship during COVID-19 do not conflict with state law and are therefore not preempted. While the ordinance provision staying late fees is preempted, the rest can be harmonized with state eviction statutes as establishing substantive defenses rather than conflicting with the statutes' procedural framework. Controlling Washington precedent has established that the state eviction laws provide only procedures, not substantive rights, so local governments can permissibly provide additional defenses.
These slides describe the main provisions of the Registration of Documents Ordinance of Sri Lanka and what should be observed by Notaries when submitting Deeds and Notices for registration. This is from a lecture in Conveyancing conducted for the final year students of the Sri Lanka Law College in 2007
547 2018 03 01 edmonton (city) v can-west corporate air charters ltdPaul Barrette
The Alberta Land Compensation Board was considering an application by the City of Edmonton to dismiss a claim by Can-West Corporate Air Charters Ltd. for compensation relating to an expropriation by the City. Can-West was a lessee of the land at the time it received notice that the City intended to expropriate, but was no longer a lessee when the certificate of approval was registered. The Board had to determine if these facts alone prevented Can-West's claim, except for potential costs under sections 35 or 39 of the Expropriation Act. The Board also considered whether expropriation should be viewed as a process rather than just the moment title transfers, and what compensation may be owed if the expropri
This memorandum supports plaintiff Carol Broad's motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent defendant Herb Hancock from demolishing and reconstructing his property. The memorandum argues that Broad is likely to succeed on the merits because Hancock's construction plans violate the governing documents of their homeowners association and Broad's express easement for air and light. It asserts that Broad will suffer irreparable harm without an injunction and that the balance of hardships weighs in her favor. The memorandum concludes that both a preliminary and permanent injunction should be granted to prevent Hancock from breaching the covenant and violating Broad's property rights.
NY AG Schneiderman's Petition of FERC to Investigate the Constitution Pipelin...Marcellus Drilling News
A sham petition by New York's power-mad Attorney General, Eric Schneiderman, requesting that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission investigate the Constitution Pipeline for cutting down a few trees along the pipeline's proposed path (a path approved by FERC) before New York granted its own permission. It is a move by Scheiderman to provide political cover for an embattled and corrupt governor, Andrew Cuomo, and an attempt to smear the good name Williams and the Constitution Pipeline project.
Land acquisition fazal subhan dg kpja nov 2018zulfi799
This document provides an overview of Pakistan's Land Acquisition Act of 1894. Some key points:
- The act allows the government to acquire private land for public purposes like infrastructure projects, and provides compensation to landowners.
- There is a process for notifying landowners, surveying the land, determining compensation, allowing objections, and appeals. Compensation is based on market value and includes damages.
- Temporary occupation of land for up to 3 years is also allowed. Companies can acquire land for projects after agreements with the government.
- Objections can be referred to civil courts, which will determine the appropriate area and compensation. The act aims to balance land acquisition needs with protecting landowner rights and
Anthony F. Dellapelle presented on the impact of Covid-19 on property taxes in New Jersey. He discussed how assessments are analyzed and tax appeal procedures. The pandemic has impacted valuations for some commercial properties like retail and nursing homes that have suffered under restrictions. However, residential properties and warehouses have increased in value. Covid-19 economic impacts may be evidence in 2021 tax appeals but it is unclear if conditions are temporary or a long-term change. Procedures for tax appeals have adapted with virtual hearings and uncertainty around future filing deadlines and trial schedules.
"Presentation on the Impact of Higher Education on Real Estate Assets: Mergers, Consolidations, Closings and Expansions" given at the Annual Meeting of the Counselors of Real Estate in October 2019, in Nashville, Tennessee
More Related Content
Similar to Fundamentals of Condemnation Law NJICLE 2014
The document discusses eminent domain law and procedures. It provides biographical information about Anthony DellaPelle, an eminent domain attorney. It then covers topics such as the constitutional basis for eminent domain, the requirement that takings be for public use, that just compensation be provided, and the condemnation process including negotiations, commissioners' hearings, and trials. It discusses issues related to determining authority to condemn, defenses to condemnation, and impacts of the Harvey Cedars v. Karan Supreme Court decision.
Defending Against Tenant’s Warranty of Habitability Claim and Other Defenses Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C.
The document discusses various defenses that can be used against a tenant's claim for a rent abatement due to a landlord breaching the warranty of habitability. It outlines 11 defenses including the tenant failing to provide access to make repairs, electing other remedies like a rent reduction from the housing authority, and failing to notify the landlord of issues. It also notes that abatements do not apply to personal property damage, conditions caused by the tenant, or non-residential leases. Landlords cannot defend against abatement claims by arguing they are a special entity like a city or co-op. The document provides case examples to illustrate different defenses.
Municipal Sales & Use Tax Collections and Enforcementmlbenham
This document discusses various methods for collecting unpaid utility bills and taxes. It outlines Colorado statutes regarding collection of delinquent utility charges and the options municipalities have to certify unpaid charges to the county for collection as taxes. The document also discusses tax liens, collection actions, dealing with problem accounts in bankruptcy, and foreclosure proceedings. Collection of sales and use tax is discussed, including audit programs, taxpayer confidentiality, dispute resolution processes, and methods for enforcing collection such as tax liens and distraint and sale.
The document summarizes New Jersey statutes and court rules related to landlord-tenant law and eviction proceedings. It discusses when a landlord can file to transfer an eviction case from a Special Civil Part court to a Law Division court, rebuttable presumptions against landlord retaliation, and grounds for a tenant to obtain a judgment if an eviction is filed for retaliatory reasons. It also covers stays of eviction warrants and when a court must issue a warrant for possession. The document provides an overview of New Jersey laws governing landlord-tenant disputes and eviction cases.
This case involves a dispute over whether a hotel property's nonconforming use status under zoning laws had been abandoned. The local board of adjustments found that the long-disused hotel's nonconforming use as a hotel had not been abandoned because the owners had attempted to sell the property as a hotel. However, the circuit court reversed, finding abandonment had occurred. The appellate court affirmed, finding that while the sale attempt rebutted the presumption of abandonment from the long disuse, the overall record compelled a finding that the owners intended to abandon the nonconforming use.
This case involves a dispute over whether a nonconforming hotel use was abandoned under the city's zoning ordinance. The owners wanted to convert the hotel into offices. A neighbor argued the hotel use was abandoned due to years of non-use. The board found no abandonment since the owners tried to sell the property as a hotel. The court reversed, finding the record showed an intent to discontinue the hotel use based on years of non-use and no explanation for it. The appellate court affirmed, as the record did not show efforts to continue the hotel use or find an acceptable substitute use during the long period of non-use.
This document summarizes the key aspects and procedures regarding Rule 68 on the foreclosure of real estate mortgages and Rule 69 on partition under the Rules of Court. It discusses the two types of foreclosure, where to file actions, who can be defendants, prescription periods, and effects of foreclosure sales. It also outlines the two stages of a partition action, when commissioners may be appointed, and duties of commissioners in partitioning property.
This document provides an overview of Washington rental housing law. It discusses the various rules and statutes that govern landlord-tenant relationships, including federal, state, and local laws. It outlines the key rights and responsibilities of both landlords and tenants. It also summarizes the legal processes for tenant screening, lease termination, eviction, and discrimination complaints.
First Natl Acceptance Co. v. City of Utica_12-cv-01622-0[1]James Evans
This case concerns the demolition of an apartment building owned by John Gosnell in Utica, New York. First National Acceptance Company held a mortgage on the property. The City of Utica inspected the building and issued notices of violations to Gosnell, but did not notify First National or follow certain statutory procedures. First National claims the demolition violated its due process rights. The court will determine if issues of material fact exist regarding whether Utica followed applicable laws in declaring the building unsafe and ordering its demolition.
Federal Judge Rules Against Small Haulers in Waste Management DisputeThis Is Reno
Reno's small waste haulers were dealt a blow this week in their ongoing dispute against the City of Reno and Waste Management. Green Solutions Recycling filed suit against the city and Reno Disposal (Waste Management) over the city's enforcement of its franchise agreement with Waste Management.
FLSA Litigation - Federal Court - MDFL Tampa - Fee Entitlement & MootnessPollard PLLC
Lawyers in FLSA cases and particularly on the defense side should view this as a cautionary tale: Tendering a check for the wages at issue does not moot the plaintiff's claim. FLSA claims are live until there is a judgment or a settlement approved by the court. And plaintiffs DO get their fees for litigating over the issue of attorneys' fees.
Simply put: A legitimate FLSA case, a skilled attorney on the plaintiff side, and defense counsel who do not understand the applicable legal framework make for disastrous results.
This document is a stipulation and order modifying a previous judgment in a divorce case between Gary W. XXXXXX and Barbara K. XXXXXX. It stipulates that (1) Barbara will receive $84,659 from Gary's 401(k) plan, ownership of their Florida condo, funds from rental and personal bank accounts, and levies against Gary's accounts; (2) these transfers settle all child and spousal support claims; (3) the 401(k) transfer is non-taxable; (4) Gary's additional child and spousal support obligations are deemed satisfied; and (5) enforcement actions against Gary will be terminated upon execution of this order.
Saud A.H. Khokhar has over 30 years of experience providing legal research, writing, and document preparation services under attorney supervision. He has expertise in areas such as real estate, foreclosure, bankruptcy, matrimonial law, immigration, and landlord/tenant law. Saud has also drafted appeals and legal filings in numerous representative court cases. He holds a Bachelor's degree from Pace University and certificates in internet technology and real estate. Saud is also a licensed real estate broker, mortgage broker, insurance broker, and notary public.
This Supreme Court of Canada case involves the interpretation of a release agreement between Mary Bailey and the City of Corner Brook. Bailey had been involved in a car accident where she struck a city employee, David Temple, who then sued Bailey. Bailey and the city entered into a settlement agreement and release regarding Bailey's separate lawsuit against the city. However, Bailey later filed a third-party claim against the city in Temple's lawsuit against her. The city argued the release barred this third-party claim. The court had to determine whether there was a special rule for interpreting releases and whether the application judge erred in his broad interpretation of the release to include Bailey's third-party claim.
King county-superior-court-order-on-rha-v-city-of-seattle-22421Roger Valdez
This order denies the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and grants the defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment. It finds that the three Seattle ordinances establishing defenses to eviction due to financial hardship during COVID-19 do not conflict with state law and are therefore not preempted. While the ordinance provision staying late fees is preempted, the rest can be harmonized with state eviction statutes as establishing substantive defenses rather than conflicting with the statutes' procedural framework. Controlling Washington precedent has established that the state eviction laws provide only procedures, not substantive rights, so local governments can permissibly provide additional defenses.
These slides describe the main provisions of the Registration of Documents Ordinance of Sri Lanka and what should be observed by Notaries when submitting Deeds and Notices for registration. This is from a lecture in Conveyancing conducted for the final year students of the Sri Lanka Law College in 2007
547 2018 03 01 edmonton (city) v can-west corporate air charters ltdPaul Barrette
The Alberta Land Compensation Board was considering an application by the City of Edmonton to dismiss a claim by Can-West Corporate Air Charters Ltd. for compensation relating to an expropriation by the City. Can-West was a lessee of the land at the time it received notice that the City intended to expropriate, but was no longer a lessee when the certificate of approval was registered. The Board had to determine if these facts alone prevented Can-West's claim, except for potential costs under sections 35 or 39 of the Expropriation Act. The Board also considered whether expropriation should be viewed as a process rather than just the moment title transfers, and what compensation may be owed if the expropri
This memorandum supports plaintiff Carol Broad's motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent defendant Herb Hancock from demolishing and reconstructing his property. The memorandum argues that Broad is likely to succeed on the merits because Hancock's construction plans violate the governing documents of their homeowners association and Broad's express easement for air and light. It asserts that Broad will suffer irreparable harm without an injunction and that the balance of hardships weighs in her favor. The memorandum concludes that both a preliminary and permanent injunction should be granted to prevent Hancock from breaching the covenant and violating Broad's property rights.
NY AG Schneiderman's Petition of FERC to Investigate the Constitution Pipelin...Marcellus Drilling News
A sham petition by New York's power-mad Attorney General, Eric Schneiderman, requesting that the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission investigate the Constitution Pipeline for cutting down a few trees along the pipeline's proposed path (a path approved by FERC) before New York granted its own permission. It is a move by Scheiderman to provide political cover for an embattled and corrupt governor, Andrew Cuomo, and an attempt to smear the good name Williams and the Constitution Pipeline project.
Land acquisition fazal subhan dg kpja nov 2018zulfi799
This document provides an overview of Pakistan's Land Acquisition Act of 1894. Some key points:
- The act allows the government to acquire private land for public purposes like infrastructure projects, and provides compensation to landowners.
- There is a process for notifying landowners, surveying the land, determining compensation, allowing objections, and appeals. Compensation is based on market value and includes damages.
- Temporary occupation of land for up to 3 years is also allowed. Companies can acquire land for projects after agreements with the government.
- Objections can be referred to civil courts, which will determine the appropriate area and compensation. The act aims to balance land acquisition needs with protecting landowner rights and
Similar to Fundamentals of Condemnation Law NJICLE 2014 (20)
Anthony F. Dellapelle presented on the impact of Covid-19 on property taxes in New Jersey. He discussed how assessments are analyzed and tax appeal procedures. The pandemic has impacted valuations for some commercial properties like retail and nursing homes that have suffered under restrictions. However, residential properties and warehouses have increased in value. Covid-19 economic impacts may be evidence in 2021 tax appeals but it is unclear if conditions are temporary or a long-term change. Procedures for tax appeals have adapted with virtual hearings and uncertainty around future filing deadlines and trial schedules.
"Presentation on the Impact of Higher Education on Real Estate Assets: Mergers, Consolidations, Closings and Expansions" given at the Annual Meeting of the Counselors of Real Estate in October 2019, in Nashville, Tennessee
Presentation on "Respinding to the Abuse of Motions in Limine", made at the ALI-CLE Annual Eminent Domain and Land Valuation Conference in January 2020 in Nashville, Tennessee
This document outlines the key topics covered in a course on condemnation appraisals, including: retaining expert witnesses and the attorney-expert relationship; discovery considerations; preparing valuation reports; reviewing other parties' reports; and using rebuttal reports. The course discusses the anatomy of appraisal reports, ensuring compliance with standards, analyzing highest and best use and valuation approaches, and techniques for cross-examining opposing experts.
This document summarizes important redevelopment case law from New Jersey, New York, and other states. It discusses cases such as Berman v. Parker, Kelo v. City of New London, Gallenthin Realty v. Paulsboro, and Harrison Redevelopment Agency v. DeRose. The document also discusses legislative responses to Kelo, debates around defining "blight," challenges to stated public purposes for takings, and issues of notice and property owners' ability to challenge redevelopment plans.
This document discusses the practical and ethical use of social media in litigation. It provides an overview of key issues including competence using social media, using social media for discovery purposes and as evidence, and considerations regarding attorney-client privilege, work product, and ethics. The document also lists numerous resources on these topics, including ABA and state bar opinions and ethics guidelines. The presenter is Anthony DellaPelle, a partner at McKirdy, Riskin, Olson & DellaPelle, P.C. who discusses his social media use and recent cases related to discovery, privilege, and admissibility of social media evidence.
The document discusses highest and best use as a critical factor in property valuation for redevelopment condemnations. It provides background on just compensation requirements and defines highest and best use. The document summarizes key considerations in determining highest and best use, including physical possibility, legal permissibility, financial feasibility, and maximally productive use. It also discusses how New Jersey case law has established that highest and best use analysis must demonstrate reasonable probability, not just possibility, of alternative uses or approvals. The document uses a Bloomfield train station property as a case study example.
This document summarizes a panel discussion on bringing dead shopping centers back to life through redevelopment in New Jersey. The panel discusses recent legislative reforms that make it easier for municipalities to redevelop blighted areas, even if eminent domain is required. Two bills were mentioned that aim to help redevelop vacant malls and large vacant offices by qualifying them as blighted if they meet certain vacancy thresholds. The panel also presented case studies of redeveloping former Kmart and Lowe's centers in New Jersey through mixed-use projects that have added new tax revenue. The panel took questions on issues like whether property rights are still adequately protected under the new laws.
This document discusses partial takings of property for environmental protection purposes and proper compensation for property owners. It summarizes a New Jersey Supreme Court case, Borough of Harvey Cedars v. Karan, which found that just compensation for a partial taking must consider factors that increase or decrease the remaining property's value, not just damages. This overturns the previous exclusion of "general benefits" like storm protection. The implications are that communities may more aggressively pursue easements for dune replenishment projects, while compensation determinations will now consider offsetting benefits against damages.
This document summarizes a presentation about the legal impacts of Superstorm Sandy on property rights in New Jersey. It discusses the Harvey Cedars v. Karan Supreme Court case, which determined that storm protection benefits must be considered as an offset against damages when part of a property is taken via eminent domain for dune replenishment. It notes how the decision may impact future just compensation determinations. It also outlines ongoing legal issues from condemnation cases related to post-Sandy dune replenishment projects.
This document summarizes New Jersey's redevelopment laws and recent changes made in response to court rulings. It discusses the Local Redevelopment and Housing Law, criteria for designating an area "in need of redevelopment," and key cases like Gallenthin Realty v. Paulsboro and Harrison Redevelopment Agency v. DeRose. It also describes legislation passed in 2013 that codified these rulings, clarified the difference between "condemnation" and "non-condemnation" redevelopment areas, and established new notice requirements. Several redevelopment success stories in New Jersey cities are highlighted.
This document summarizes key cases and principles regarding partial takings and just compensation. It discusses several cases where the government initially underestimated damages and just compensation amounts for partial takings of property. Lessons highlighted include fully evaluating damages and not assuming aspects of a taking will cause no damage. The landmark Harvey Cedars v. Karan case is summarized, which allowed consideration of storm protection "special benefits" from a dune as an offset to lost view damages. Implications for future cases are discussed.
A summary of legal principles relevant to partial takings cases, as presented to graduate students at the Bloustein School of Public Policy and Planning at Rutgers University
A historical perspective of the Harrison, New Jersey Waterfront Redevelopment Area, including aerials, photographs and renderings of the area before the project, during construction, at the present time, and what it will look like in the future.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdfveteranlegal
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
2. Anthony F. Della Pelle, Esq. , CRE (Moderator)
John H. Buonocore, Jr., Esq.
(McKirdy & Riskin, PA)
Timothy P. Duggan, Esq.
(Stark & Stark)
Wanda Y. Ortiz
(Deputy Attorney General, State of NJ)
Maurice J. Stack, CRE
(Stack, Coolahan & Stack)
2
3. Power of Eminent Domain
Just Compensation
Legal Resources
Prelitigation Issues
Litigation
Valuation and Appraisal
Non-Compensability
Environmental Issues
Relocation
Question and Answer
3
4. Constitutional and Legislative Grant of Authority
Enabling Legislation – Municipal, County, Special
Agency, State and Federal Governments
Public Use Requirement
Requirement for Just Compensation
4
5. "...nor shall private property be taken for public use
without just compensation."
U.S. Const. Amend. V
"Private property shall not be taken for public use without
just compensation. Individuals or private corporations
shall not be authorized to take property for public use
without just compensation first made to the owners."
N.J.S.A. Const. Art. 1, Sec. 20
5
6. Compensation for the property taken
Reduction in value (damages) to any remaining
property
Interest
Indemnity for loss
Attorneys’ fees and costs not generally
recoverable by condemnee
6
7. Eminent Domain Act - N.J.S.A.20:3-1 et seq.
Rule 4:73 (Condemnation)
Relocation Assistance Act - N.J.S.A. 20:4-1 et
seq., N.J.S.A. 27:7-72, et seq. and regulations -
N.J.A.C. 5:11-1; N.J.A.C. 16:6-1.1 et seq.
Local Redevelopment and Housing Law –
N.J.S.A. 40A:12A:-1, et seq.
7
8. 8
21 New Jersey Practice,
Skills and Methods,
Eminent Domain
10. The Appraisal of Real Estate, 13th Ed. Appraisal
Institute
Eaton, Real Estate Valuation in Litigation, 2d Ed.,
Appraisal Institute
10
11. N.J.S.A. 20:3-1 et seq.
Uniform procedure applicable to all proceedings
in which the power to condemn is being exercised,
except acquisitions by PANYNJ which proceed
pursuant to N.J.S.A. 32:1-77, et seq.
Applies to “inverse” actions
11
12. Attempt at amicable resolution through bona fide
negotiations
Final judgment on authority for and due exercise
of power by condemnor
Commissioners’ Hearing
Jury Trial on appeal from Commissioners’ Report
on the issue of just compensation
12
13. Fact finder is concerned with just compensation
only - Court adjudicates all other issues (e.g., title,
proceeds allocation)
One award representing the value of all interests
in the property (“unit rule”)
Award must take into account all damages, both
present and prospective - no further proceedings
or relief
13
14. Real vs. Personal Property
As to real estate, “functional unit” test for “fixture”
issues
Interplay between functional unit and moving
expenses as relocation benefit
* N.J.S.A. 20:3-2(d)
* State v. Gallant, 42 N.J. 583 (1964)
14
15. Pursuant to N.J.S.A. 20:3-30, the earliest of the
following events:
Date possession is taken by the condemnor
Complaint date
Date on which condemnor substantially affects
use and enjoyment of property
Declaration of “blight” or “in need of
redevelopment” determination, but see N.J.S.A.
20:3-38
* See Kirby Forest Industries v. U.S., 467 U.S. 1 (1984)
15
16. Prelitigation Entry and Inspection/Evaluation
Title Searches
Parcel Surveys
Appraisal
Environmental Inspections
Right of Entry
16
17. Notice of appraisal inspection
Written offer by certified mail
Offer not less than approved appraisal
Description of property to be acquired
Disclosure of all appraisals obtained
Minimum 14 days for reply to offer
Must address issues raised by owner
17
18. Complaint
Order to Show Cause
Declaration of Taking
Order Permitting Deposit
Notices
Answer
Judgment Appointing Commissioners
18
19. Must include:
a statement showing the
amount of compensation
offered by the condemnor;
a reasonable disclosure of the
manner in which the amount
has been calculated.
“Reasonable disclosure” by the
condemnor includes furnishing
the condemnee with:
the map
a description of land to be
acquired
the identity of the
improvements to be acquired,
if any
a statement of the full fair
market value
a description of the appraisal
valuation method or methods
relied upon
(cont’d)
19
20. a breakdown of the appraised
value allocated to the land to be
acquired, and improvements to
be acquired, if any;
Data concerning comparable sales
or leases relied upon in
determining the amount of
compensation offered which
shall include:
names of seller and purchaser or
landlord and tenant,
the location of the property by
block, lot, street, street number,
and municipality,
date of sale or date and duration
of lease
the consideration for the sale or
amount of rent
the book and page number of the
recording of the deed of the
comparable sale
any unusual factors concerning
the property known to the
condemnor which may affect
value.
20
21. Join all parties with an interest in the property, e.g.:
◦ Tenants, holders of easements, occupants
◦ Mortgagees and other lien holders
◦ Municipality (for taxes)
Only those parties who are joined have their interest
foreclosed by the proceedings.
Easements are to be condemned separately as a “DE” parcel
together with the property which it serves; the area of the
easement should be designated on the servient parcel as
“SE” and the appraisal should adjust accordingly.
21
22. Action is brought in a summary manner pursuant
to R.4:67.
May be presented to the court ex parte.
No summons, but language is consistent
Served within the state at least 10 days before the
return date
22
23. Basically, a “deed” from the condemnor to itself
Fixes the property and rights acquired based on
legal description
Recorded in County Clerk/Register’s office
23
24. Provides for deposit of estimated compensation
(usually the amount of the offer per the appraisal)
May be obtained ex parte
24
25. Proof of Service of Deposit and Filing/Recording
of Declaration of Taking
Notice of making of deposit into court to owner
Proof of service of such notice must be filed in the
action prior to taking possession.
25
26. Provided no declaration of taking has been filed, the action may be
unilaterally abandoned by the condemnor
at any time before, or within 30 days after, the filing of the award of
commissioners;
or in the event of an appeal from the award, at any time before, or
within 30 days after, the entry of judgment;
or in the event that a hearing before commissioners is waived, at
any time before, or within 30 days after, judgment has been entered
in the action. [N.J.S.A. 20:3-35]
Otherwise, condemnee must consent to abandonment
Entitlement to fees costs and expenses. N.J.S.A.20:3-26(b)
West Orange v. 769 Associates, LLC, 397 N.J. Super. 244 (App.
Div. 2007)
26
27. Certain Classes of Damages are not Compensable as a
Matter of Law:
(1) Loss of business; franchise, future or current
profits, tenants or good will.
State by Commissioner of Transportation v. Hess Realty Corp., 226 N.J.
Super. 256 (App. Div. 1988), certif.. den. 113 N.J. 229 (1989), certif..
den. 493 U.S. 964 (1989).
(2) Damages based upon use of land acquired from
others; e.g. power lines of adjoining property do not
constitute a compensable taking.
Public Service Elec. & Gas v. Oldwick, 125 N.J. Super. 31 (App. Div.
1973), certif.. den. 64 N.J. 113 (1973)
27
28. (3) Change in grade/visibility is not compensable unless it
is caused by the taking itself: State, by Commr. of
Transp. v. Weisswasser, 149 N.J. 320 (1997);
(4) Typically noise and vibration impacts are not
compensable since they tend to be speculative; in
order to be compensable it must be demonstrated that
there is a measurable increase in noise level and/or
vibrations actually caused by taking and that they are
reflected in the market place. See State by Comm’r of
Transp. V. Carroll, 123 N.J. 308 (1991).
28
29. (5) Upstream generated drainage is not compensable in
condemnation action; only direct problems resulting
from the land taken; See State by Comm’r of Transp.
V. Rosenblum, 200 N.J.Super. 209 (App. Div 1985).
(6) Landscaping/Sand/Gravel/Minerals/Crops are not
valued separately since they are elements of land
taken; must demonstrate enhancement value; See
State v. Whitehead Bros. Co., 210 N.J. Super. 359
(Law Div. 1986); see also Tennessee Gas
Transmission Co. v. Maze, 45 N.J. Super. 496 ( App.
Div 1957). Loss of standing crops are paid directly
under N.J.S.A. 20:3-29.1.
29
30. (7) Loss or Denial of Access NOT Compensable unless there is a
showing that Remaining Access is Unreasonable as a Matter of Law:
See State by Commissioner of Transp. V. National Amusements, 244
N.J. Super. 219 (App. Div 1990), certif. den. 127 N.J. 327 (1991).
◦ Damages Attributable to general circuitry of travel, diversion of traffic
by Highway Change or erection of a Barrier are not Compensable:
State v. Monmouth Hills, Inc., 140 N.J. Super. 449 (App. Div 1970),
certif. den. 57 N.J. 133 (1970).
◦ Revocation or Modification of Access under Access code: N.J.S.A.
27:7-92 et seq. does not result in severance damages since it is
pursuant to police power; administrative remedies should be pursued
instead: See State by Comm’r of Transp. v. Nordquist, (App Div)
unpublished.
◦ But see, State by Comm’r of Transp. v. Van Nortwick, 287 N.J.
Super. 59 (App. Div. 1995)
30
31. Condemnees are obligated to bring before the Court any
Objections to the Maps, Descriptions or the Parameters
of the Taking as well as what Constitutes the Remainder
or the Nature and extent of Property Rights existing in
the before condition prior to Appointment of
Commissioners; Such issues are not to be raised before
the finder of fact; e.g. Commissioners or subsequently
by the jury: State by Commissioner of Transp v.
Orenstein, 124 N.J. Super. 295 (App. Div. 1973), certif..
den. 63 N.J 588 (1973).
31
32. Must raise all defenses to the right to take and
manner of exercise of the power of eminent
domain.
Failure to deny the authority of the condemnor
to condemn in the manner provided for by the
rules constitutes a waiver of the defense.
All issues other than those related to value and
damages must be determined by the court prior
to the appointment of commissioners.
32
33. Must demand a jury trial if one is desired.
Must be served and filed in accordance with the
Rules or pursuant to Order to Show Cause
Non-contesting appearance may be filed in lieu
of answer; valuation issues preserved. N.J.S.A.
20:3-12(c).
33
34. When the authority to condemn is denied, all further
steps in the action are stayed until the issue of the right
to take has been finally determined.
Does “finally determined" mean exhaustion of the
appellate process if appellate review is sought?
◦ N.J.S.A. 20:3-11
◦ Bridgewater Tp. v. Yarnell, 64 N.J. 211 (1974)
◦ County of Sussex v. Merrill Lynch, 351 N.J. Super 1 (App. Div. 2002)
There is no discovery on the issue of the right to
condemn except by leave of court. N.J.S.A. 20:3-12(d).
34
35. No public purpose – bad faith, pretext
Lack of necessity
Failure to pass requisite authorizations
Indefinite description
Failure to engage in bona fide negotiations.
N.J.S.A. 20:3-6
35
36. Condemnor’s Procedural
and Substantive
Compliance with Eminent
Domain Act
Hearing may be required
* R. 4:67-5; R. 4:73-1
* Bergen County v.
Hackensack, 39 N.J. 377
(1963)
36
37. Final Judgment as
to Right to Take and
Due Exercise of
Power
Appoints 3
Commissioners
Jurisdiction now
with Commissioners
Appealable as of right
Stay of further
proceedings upon
appeal?
37
38. The amount of the initial deposit may not be less than
the amount of the prelitigation offer N.J.S.A.20:3-18
which itself may not be less than the amount of the
condemnor's approved appraisal.
Deposits into Superior Court are by administered by the
Clerk of Superior Court, Trust Fund Unit, which holds the
funds in an interest-bearing account.
38
39. By motion and petition
Request for dismissal of other defendants
Processing withdrawal from Trust Funds Unit
Condemnor’s ability to preserve portion of deposit
for site remediation
Consideration of possession issues
39
40. Valuation (Appraisal)
Commissioner’s Hearing Procedure
Jury or Bench Trial – de novo
40
41. Willing buyer & seller
Neither being under a compulsion to act
Being fully informed of all facts and circumstances
about the acquired property (even if not known on
date of value)
41
42. Owner is not limited to value for the use to which
property is currently being put - owner entitled to
value for highest and best use. State v. Caoili, 135
N.J. 252 (1994)
42
43. HBU must be:
Physically Possible
Legally Permissible
Financially Feasible
Maximally Productive
43
44. Sales Comparison or Market Data Approach
Cost Approach
Income Approach
44
45. Based on sales of similar or “comparable”
properties
◦ Units of comparison
◦ Sales distinguished from:
Offers or Listings
Options
Contracts
45
46. Based on cost of reproduction less depreciation
◦ Not “replacement value”
Entrepreneurial Cost
46
47. Based on conversion of income and capitalization
into property value
Actual vs. Economic Income
◦ Comparable leases
Expenses
Capitalization rate
47
48. 48
•Just compensation determined by “fair
market value” of the property as of the
date of value
49. 49
• Before and After method
value of entire parcel before taking
– value of remainder after taking = just
compensation
• Per Se method
value of land taken + diminution in value (or
damages) to remainder = just compensation
50. 50
• of “all material facts and circumstances – both
past and prospective – that would influence a
buyer or seller interested in consummating a
sale of the property”
State of New Jersey by Commissioner of Transportation v. Silver, 92 N.J. 507 (1983)
Village of South Orange v. Alden Corporation, 71 N.J. 363 (1976)
State of New Jersey by Commissioner of Transportation v. Weiswasser, 149 N.J. 320
(1997)
51. In order to obtain severance damages (from
taking a non-contiguous parcel) landowner must
show that remaining parcel and parcel taken were
parts of a single economic use and under the
same ownership.
Housing Authority, City of Newark v. Norfolk Realty Co., 71 N.J. 314 (1976)
51
52. 3 Basic Rules:
Evidence of cost of restoring remaining property
can be no greater than decrease in marked value
if left uncured
Cannot be speculative (reasonable and certain –
previously written existing boundaries of tract)
Duty to mitigate by condemnee
State of New Jersey v. Sun Oil, 160 N.J.Super. 513 (Law Div. 1978)
State of New Jersey by Commissioner of Transportation v. Weiswasser, 149 N.J. 320
(1997)
52
53. Non-binding arbitration
Provide reports 15 days in advance
Obtain Award, File Appeal
No appearance = no right to appeal
* Borough of Keyport v. Maropakis, 332 N.J. Super. 210
(App. Div. 2000)
53
54. File within 20 days of service of award
May be relaxed up to 30 days for good cause
Non-relaxable thereafter
Party may not rely on appeal filed by adversary -
Adversary may withdraw
* City of Long Branch v. Spanos, A-2936-04T1, 2006 W.L.
1627977 (App. Div. 2006)
54
55. Condemnor proceeds first
No burden of proof
Condemnation trial is an "evidential construction
of a hypothetical sale"
wide discretion in admission and rejection of
evidence
Jury view of condemned property. R.4:73-7
55
57. Appreciation of Constitutional Magnitude of Issues
Careful Attention to Procedural Details
Careful Attention to Substantive Details
Appraisal familiarity
57
58. Condemnor may insert in Complaint full reservation of
rights with respect to contamination, solid waste, known
or unknown;
Future cost recovery actions by a condemnor or related
party Will NOT be barred by and doctrines of preclusion;
e.g. Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel, or Entire
Controversy Doctrine.
Eminent Domain Act does not mandate a condemnor to
conduct a full environmental assessment, but only
requires to disclose what is known at the time.
New Jersey Transit Corporation v. Cat in The Hat,
L.L.C., 177 N.J. 29 (2003).
58
59. Environmental Costs cannot be Deducted from Fair
Market Value; Property is to be valued as if
“Remediated”.
Estimated Cost of Remediation May be Withheld by the
Court and Remain on Deposit Pending Filing of a
Separate Cost Recovery since it is a “Transactional
Cost’.
Trial Court Hearing may be Held to Determine
Appropriate Amount to Withhold on Deposit.
In Appraising Properties as Remediated, Stigma by
reason of the Remediated State of the Property can be
Considered; recommended to have market support
thereof.
Housing Authority of the City of New Brunswick v.
Suydam, 177 N.J. 2 (2003).
59
60. Effect upon Highest and Best Use:
◦ In order to develop property to H & B Use, further
remediation may have to be conducted; this may in
turn present additional extraordinary costs over and
above those which may be incurred compared to a
property not needing additional or no further
remediation.
◦ Cost of further Remediation may not be cost effective
and thereby limit H & B Use of property.
◦ Stigma may have impact upon marketability of
property or otherwise impact H & B Use of Property.
60
61. • Uniformity
• Equality
• Provide benefits variety of events, including non-condemnation events
• All qualified occupants are entitled to relocation assistance, including
tenants, owners, relatives, family members and other qualified
occupants.
• Require relocation plan (WRAP) prior to acquisitions and relocations.
62. 62
N.J.S.A. 20:4-1 (Relocation Assistance Act)
◦ The regulations promulgated pursuant to N.J.S.A. 20:4-1, et seq., are
found at N.J.A.C. 5:11-1.1, et seq.
N.J.S.A. 52:31B-1, et seq. (Relocation Assistance Law of 1967)
◦ The regulations promulgated under N.J.S.A. 27:7-72, et seq., are found
at N.J.A.C. 16:6-1.1, et seq.
N.J.S.A. 27:7-72, et seq. (Uniform Transportation Replacement Housing &
Relocation Act).
42 U.S.C.A. §4601, et seq. (Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real
Property Acquisition Polices Act of 1970).
63. 63
Condemnors must assist the relocatee in finding a new location or
dwelling before any attempt at displacement or eviction of the displaced
person may occur. N.J.S.A. 20:4-7; N.J.S.A. 27:7-78; N.J.A.C. 16:6-
1.3(a); N.J.A.C. 5:11-2.1 and 2.2.
Workable Relocation Assistance Plan (“WRAP”)
Determine the needs of displacees;
Assist displacees in obtaining replacement housing and business locations;
Secure the coordination of relocation activities with other displacing agencies;
Assist in minimizing hardships to displacees;
Determine the extent of the need of each displacee for relocation assistance;
Assure the availability of decent, safe, and sanitary housing;
Determine the source, amount and availability of funds necessary to complete
relocation; and
Provide any other information deemed necessary to insure the regulatory
provisions are carried out.
64. 64
Residential RReellooccaattiioonn
PPaayymmeennttss N.J.A.C. 5:11-3.2: Either the actual reasonable moving expenses incurred or a fixed payment
based on the number of rooms in the unit, not to exceed $300.00, and a $200.00 dislocation
allowance.
Moving expenses shall not be considered unreasonable due to distance if the distance is 50
miles or less. For good cause, a move of more than 50 miles may be deemed reasonable by the
displacing agency. See also, N.JS.A. 20-4-4.
N.J.A.C. 16:6-2.1: Any displaced owner/occupant or tenant of a dwelling who qualifies is entitled
to payment of his or her actual moving and related expenses, as the agency determines to be
reasonable and necessary, including expenses for:
◦ Packing, crating, unpacking and uncrating of the personal property;
◦ Disconnecting, dismantling, removing, reassembling and reinstalling relocated household appliances, and
other personal property;
◦ Storage of the personal property for a period not to exceed 12 months, unless the agency determines that a
longer period is necessary;
◦ Insurance for the replacement value of the property in connection with the move and necessary storage;
◦ The replacement value of property lost, stolen or damaged in the process of moving (not due to the fault or
negligence of the displaced person, his or her agent, or employee); where insurance covering such loss, theft
or damages is not reasonably available; and
◦ Other moving related expenses that are not listed as ineligible under N.J.A.C. 16:6-2.5, as the agency
determines to be reasonable and necessary.
◦ Rental Assistance Payments and down payment assistance. N.J.A.C. 5:11-3.5(a); N.J.A.C. 16:6-2.8;
N.J.A.C. 5:11-3.6; N.J.A.C. 16:6-2.8(c)
◦ Replacement housing differential payment N.J.A.C. 5:11-3.7 (not to exceed $15,000); N.J.A.C. 16:6-2.7 (not
to exceed $22,500)
65. 65
BBuussiinneessss RReellooccaattiioonn
PPaayymmeennttss Self move agreement versus Actual and Reasonable Moving Expense
Payment of actual moving expenses limited to:
Actual reasonable and necessary cost:
Moving personal property up to 50 miles, unless the distance is enlarged by the displacing agency, for cause.
Inspection and license fees required by statute or local ordinance to permit the operation of the business at the new
location.
Reconnecting utility service to machinery and equipment, including, without limitation, the cost incurred in adapting or
converting relocation machinery or equipment to use a different type of power supply, to the extent that these services
were required in the former location. Expenses incurred in providing utility service from the right-of-way to the building
or improvements are excluded.
For physical changes in or to an existing building to which a business relocates in order to accommodate the machinery
and equipment relocated. The amount incurred shall not exceed the fair market value of the machinery and equipment
requiring the physical change. In the event the cost does exceed the fair market value of the machinery and
equipment, the displacing agency shall then be responsible to pay only the fair market value.
The owner of a displaced business may elect to replace with a comparable item any item of personal property, including,
without limitation, outdoor advertising displays or signs, utilized in its operation which is not to be moved. In such a case, the
amount of the moving expense payment shall be the lesser of:
the actual cost of the substitute equipment delivered and installed at the new location less any proceeds form the
disposition of the old equipment or, if a bona fide sale cannot be made, less the market value of the old equipment as
determined by an independent appraisal; and
The estimated cost of relocating the old equipment, as determined by the displacing agency.
66. 66
Business Relocation PPaayymmeennttss
((ccoonntt’’dd)) Self Move:
Must provide notice to the agency
Submit three estimates.
The amount of the moving cost payment shall be the lesser of the bid chosen or the estimate
obtained by the displacing agency.
Loss of tangible personal property:
A displaced business that elects not to move all or a part of the personal property may
receive a payment for actual direct loss of the personal property not moved. Must have prior
agency approval
The payment for loss of tangible personal property shall be calculated as follows:
In the event the items is sold the payment shall be the fair market value less the net sales
amount (sales price less cost of sale);
In the event the item is not sold the payment shall be the fair market value. The item shall
then be the property of the displacing agency.
67. 67
Business Relocation PPaayymmeennttss ((ccoonntt..))
Professional services necessary for:
Planning the move of the personal property;
Moving the personal property; and
Installing the relocated personal property at the replacement
location.
Re-lettering signs and replacing stationery on hand at the time of
displacement that are made obsolete as a result of the move;
The reasonable cost incurred in attempting to sell an item
that is not to be relocated;
Searching for a replacement location.
Time spent searching
Fees paid to a real estate agent or broker to locate a
replacement site, exclusive of any fees or commissions related
to the purchase of such site; and
68. 68
AAppppeeaallss
Deadlines
◦ Regulations
◦ Court rules
◦ Tort Claim statute of limitations
Appropriate Forum
◦ State or Federal Agency
◦ Agency review, Administrative review, Courts
69. 69
CCaassee LLaaww
Foreign Auto Preparation Service (FAPS) vs. New Jersey Economic
Development Authority , 201 N.J. Super. 422 (App. Div. 1995) (holding The
displacement must be the cause of the expense for which reimbursement is
sought, not the failure to rent comparable property.)
Blazer Corp. vs. NJ Sports & Exposition Authority , 195 N.J. Super. 542
(Law Div. 1984), aff’d 199 N.J. Super. 107 (App. Div. 1985) (finding date of
eviction important for statute of limitations to file claim).
In Re Berwick Ice, Inc. , 231 N.J. Super. 391 (App. Div. 1989) (holding
appeals for relocation claims must be filed and determined by appropriate state
or federal agency)
Paterson Redevelopment Agency vs. Schulman , 78 N.J. 378 (1979),
cert. denied, 444 US 900, 100 S.Ct. 210, 62 L.Ed. 2d 136 (1979) (holding that
that since the relocation statutes did not provide for interest on payments, no
interest was required to be paid with respect to relocation assistance payments)
Jersey City School District vs. Marathon Enterprises , OAL Docket No.
CAF 09962-00 and CAF 01465-04, aff’d Appellate Division docket No: A-6188-
03T5 (App. Div. 2007) (finding approximately two million of claimed relocation
expenses were reasonable and necessary in order to relocate the machinery and
equipment, and to meet the stringent USDA requirements for meat processing
facilities.)
Editor's Notes
Redevelopment Law issues
Atlantic City - casino issues
Wide discretion
N.J.S.A. 20:3-11
State v. Orenstein, 124 N.J. Super. 295 (App. Div.), certif.. denied 63 N.J. 588 (1973)
Trenton v. Lenzner, 16 N.J. 465 (1954)(parking facility for proprietary use)
West Orange v. 769 Associates, 172 N.J. 564 (2002)(roadway primarily serving residential development)
Texas Eastern v. Wildlife Preserves, 48 N.J. 261 (1967)(necessity)
Hillsborough v. Robertson, 260 N.J.Super. 37 (Law Div. 1992)
Essex Fells v. Kessler, 289 N.J. Super 329 (Law Div. 1995)
N.J.S.A. 20:3-2(j) – appealable as of right
NJSA 20:3-19 re possession
State v. Shein, 283 N.J.Super 588 (App. Div. 1995)
State v. Gorga, 26 N.J. 113 (1958)
R. 4:73-6
Paterson v. Bienstock, 123 NJSuper 457 (App.Div. 1973)(no burden of proof)