For The Death Penalty Essay

For the Death Penalty Essay
For the Death Penalty
Are we effectively punishing our most vile and baneful criminals? I believe some improvement to be
necessary; the death penalty should be legalized in all states. The United States should utilize the
capital punishment because it is economical and has deterring and incapacitating effects. While life
with no parole sentencing is a valid alternative, the death penalty is in public favor, ruled as
constitutional, is humane, and allows convicts many opportunities to appeal.
While many people will claim that too many inmates are executed, the national death row currently
has a population of 3726 criminals, consisting of 3669 men and 57 women, and only 712 convicts
have been executed since 1976. In 2000, 85...show more content...
Also, some people who oppose capital punishment believe that executions are unequally applied to
Caucasians and African–Americans. This is untrue because 46.14 percent of death row inmates are
Caucasians (wwwl.ncpa.org/ea/eama87a.html).
Public opinion of the death penalty generally supports it. When Americans were asked if they
favored the death penalty for murder convicts, 68 percent said yes (Gallup Poll,
www.pollingreport.com). An ABC News Poll asked if the "death penalty is fair because killers can
not kill again", 72 percent agreed. Even when given life with no parole as an alternative, the majority
of those polled by ABC News/Washington Post in April 2001, answered that they prefer the death
penalty. Moreover, in 1976, the United States Supreme Court declared the death penalty
constitutional (www.thepubliccause.net/deathpenalty.html#supremecourtdeathpenaltydecisions).
Another reason to utilize the death penalty is to prevent criminals from escaping prison. To
incapacitate these nefarious inmates prevents them from causing further harm to society. In March
2001, Lee John Knoch and Aaron O'Hara, both 23 years old, escaped the Snake River Correctional
Institution in Oregon. O'Hara, who was captured by authorities, is serving a six–year sentence for
sodomy, sex abuse, and two counts of rape. Knoch was not caught and had been serving life with
no parole for his 1998 conviction of five counts of aggravated murder and
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Benefits of the Death Penalty Essay
Have you ever thought about if the person next to you is a killer or a rapist? If he is, what would
you want from the government if he had killed someone you know? He should receive the death
penalty! Murderers and rapists should be punished for the crimes they have committed and should
pay the price for their wrongdoing. Having the death penalty in our society is humane; it helps the
overcrowding problem and gives relief to the families of the victims, who had to go through an event
such as murder. Without the death penalty, criminals would be more inclined to commit additional
violent crimes. Fear of death discourages people from committing crimes. If capital punishment were
carried out more it would prove to be the crime...show more content...
The death penalty has been around since the time of Jesus Christ. Executions have been recorded
from the 1600s to present times. From about 1620, the executions by year increased in the US. It
has been a steady increase up until the 1930s; later the death penalty dropped to zero in the 1970s
and then again rose steadily. US citizens said that the death penalty was unconstitutional because it
was believed that it was "cruel and unusual" punishment (Kurtis 67). In the 1970s, the executions
by year dropped between zero and one then started to rise again in the 1980s. In the year 2000,
there were nearly one hundred executions in the US (Biskupic 34). On June 29, 1972, the death
penalty was suspended because the existing laws were no longer convincing. However, four years
after this occurred, several cases came about in Georgia, Florida, and Texas where lawyers wanted
the death penalty. This set new laws in these states and later the Supreme Court decided that the
death penalty was constitutional under the Eighth Amendment (Biskupic 34).
The very first legal executions came in the United States was during the Revolutionary War against
Great Britain. British soldiers hung the first person to die by the death penalty, Nathan Hale, for
espionage (Foley 167). The reason that I have included this history is to prove that if something has
been working, why stop

The Death Penalty Essay
Is the death penalty really a rational and effective way to respond to the crimes of certain prisoners?
Thirty one percent of society believes we should not keep the death penalty, while others believe that
the death penalty doesn't really keep crime from happening. Of the thirty one percent, many believe
that executing offenders of the law only runs away from the issue at hand. Also, if society thinks
about it, ending the penalty would cost less both physically and mentally. Lastly, abolishment of the
penalty would help rid any of the negative and humane issues at hand: this involves the biblical
verse; thou shalt not kill, and the national human rights law; article 3, and 5 of the Declaration of
Independence. Is the death penalty going...show more content...
Since 1983, 60 mentally ill people have been executed. Also, it is estimated that around five to ten
percent of the death row inmates are diagnosed with some form of mental illness.
Second, ending the death penalty would cost less, when involving the physical and emotional costs
of the punishment. Within the physical aspects of the death penalty, it costs around 90,000 a year
per inmate to stay on death row. The average estimated amount for each inmate, in total, is two
million dollars. Death row costs almost four times as much as life imprisonment without parole.
Since the death penalty costs such a great amount of money, this leads tax payers to pay thousands
of unnecessary money towards the cause. If society realized that they were spending a bunch of
their money on killing inmates, they may rethink allowing the penalty in the first place. When
involving the emotional costs of the punishment, ending the death penalty would also cost less.
Not only do people have to give up some of their annual salary, they also have to give up their
mercy, compassion, and the family of the inmate's heartache. There is rarely any family who wants
to see their loved one executed. The family is always trying to get the court to change their mind
and allow the inmate to live. If a young child had a mother on death row, wouldn't that be cruel to
take the mother away

Essay on Death Penalty
Death Penalty
The death penalty is a controversial topic in the United States today and has been for a number of
years. The death penalty was overturned and then reinstated in the United States during the 1970's
due to questions concerning its fairness. The death penalty began to be reinstated slowly, but the rate
of executions has increased during the 1990's. There are a number of arguments for and against the
death penalty. Many death penalty supporters feel that the death penalty reduces crime because it
deters people from committing murder if they know that they will receive the death penalty if they
are caught. Others in favor of the death penalty feel that even if it doesn't deter others from
committing crimes, it will eliminate...show more content...
People opposed to the death penalty also point to the fact that over half of the countries in the world
have abolished the death penalty, including all other major industrialized, democratic nations. In the
five countries with the highest homicide rates that do not impose the death penalty, the murder rate
is 21.6 murders per 100,000 people. In the five countries with the highest homicide rates that do
impose the death penalty, the murder rate is 41.6 murders per 100,000 people ("Deterrence").
Furthermore, the United States has the highest crime and murder rates of any of the other major
democratic nations, all of which have abandoned the death penalty. In 1965, Great Britain called for
a five–year suspension on executions following a recent decline in the imposition of the death
penalty and growing anti–death penalty sentiments in the country. In 1969, the government
abolished the death penalty altogether because there had been no surge in homicides or crime
(Flanders 45). Death penalty opponents feel that these statistics lend credibility to the argument that
the death penalty does not cause a decrease in homicides and in some instances may even lead to an
increase in murders. Another valid point that death penalty opponents use is that the judicial system
is not flawless, and that in the United

The Death Penalty Discussion Essay
The Death Penalty Discussion
In today's world terrible crimes are being committed daily. Many people believe that these criminals
deserve one fate; death. Death penalty is the maximum sentence used in punishing people who kill
another human being and is a very controversial method of punishment. Capital punishment is a legal
infliction of death penalty and since ancient times it has bee used to punish a large variety of
offences. Criminals convicted of murder or rape need to be executed because they are danger to
society and the human race. Other people still argue that one method of execution is just as brutal as
the next.
The common sense argument that death is the best deterrent of crime...show more content...
Society and its mixed feelings towards the death penalty; capital punishment is such a harsh and
uncivilised way of treating criminals, but do they look at how the criminals are acting towards
ending other human beings life. They do not care about the lives they have destroyed, or, the
families of their victims. The death penalty can never bring back loved ones back to their families.
It seems rationally to think that if potential killers are aware that if they commit serious crimes they
would be put to death for it, they are less likely to commit these crimes again.
The concept of retribution and justice should bestow to society. This is imperative for peace to be
maintained and that justice is served. If criminals were allowed to get away with such a serious
crime as taking a humans life fear and chaos would rule. Sentence for life in prison will not be
substantial enough. The government must be trusted to protect its innocent citizens from further
crimes. A vast conception concerning death penalty is that it saves society the costs of keeping
inmates imprisoned for long periods. In the act of preserving due process of justice, the court
appeals involved with the death penalty becomes a long, drawn out and a long expensive process.
Does it save its purpose? Does executing someone for crimes such as rape, murder, adultery,
homosexual behaviour, and prostitution actually prevent

Is the Death Penalty Ethical? Essay examples
"More than 4,500 people have been executed in the United States since 1930. There is no way of
knowing how many have been executed in U.S. history because executions were often local
affairs, with no central agency keeping track of them (Maloney, 1999)." Over 4,500 people were
executed and this doesn't even include the unreported deaths. Decades ago, death penalty cases
were not even to be reported in many times. For many years, people have been rationalize
themselves for death penalty as " an eye for an eye"(2010).This "eye for an eye" statement is no
longer giving any excuses for killing humans. The controversial idea of whether humans are rational
enough to decide someone's life or death has been questioned. Humans absolutely don't have...show
more content...
People who commit the crime should get imprisoned for what they did for how long ever it is
given. Murderer who took away other's lives should be imprisoned for what they did for the rest
of their lives. Death penalty is absolutely not necessary because imprison itself will take away the
whole lives; they will not be allowed to have any life as human in society. We kill him, because he
killed is simply how death penalty works. Death penalty is only to take away people's life, not
reasonable punishment for their sin. Of course, people think death penalty is not just about the
punishment. People who believe in death penalty show the reason why they do is that death penalty
for sure is a deterrent to homicide. They also take this as a justification of supporting death penalty
system (2010). So people actually expect something out of this system other than just killing the
murderers simply for what they did. This is supposed to be a great solution to make better society by
lessoning the potential crime. In theory, the fact that society has a death penalty system should
somewhat scares the potential murderer and prevents them from committing murder. But the
percentage of murder crime shows the otherwise. Do potential murderers consider the death penalty
before they the murder? The answers are likely to be No. "Most deterrence research has found that

Ethos On Death Penalty
The death penalty has been a huge part of many political debates for the past few decades. There
are two sides, those for and those against its continued use and both have logical arguments. My
research question is if it is ethical and or beneficial for the U.S. government to continue using the
death penalty? To gain the attention of my audience, I am going to share two stories that my sources
have on those with experience in the debate. The Forbes article, "Considering The Death Penalty:
Your Tax Dollars At Work," is an anti
–death penalty piece explaining how an innocent man was on
death row and his opinion on whether or not it should be used. He said in the piece that living out a
life sentence without parole is worse than being executed....show more content...
One, saying it is inhumane and should not be done and the other side says that it is necessary in our
society. Some of the non–biased sources go over just the statistics of the death penalty. This
includes "DEATH PENALTY INFORMATION CENTER Facts about the Death Penalty" and
"Should the Death Penalty Be Allowed?". The first article explains the costs associated with the
punishment, how much it is used, states that use it, and people on death row. The second piece
gives unbiased statistics on the pros and cons on the death penalty. By providing this background,
I hope my audience will be more aware of the debate and have more information. I will then
incorporate a few more factual based articles to try and provide all the necessary details, such as
"Death Penalty Pro Con" and a few more biased articles then to get opinions going. I feel that all
my sources work well together as even when the articles have different viewpoints, they do not
contradict one another much. Basically, they highlight the importance of their own arguments and
do not really go after the other side. Overall, I feel that I have the sources necessary to write this
piece. However, I do feel that having a few more scholarly articles will only help my

Against The Death Penalty Essay
Against the Death Penalty "Murder is wrong" ("Capital Punishment"). We've been taught this
indisputable truth since childhood. The death penalty is defined as one human taking the life of
another. Coincidentally, that is a classification of murder. There are as many as thirty
–six states with
the death penalty, and it's essential that they change it. The United States needs the death penalty
abolished because it is filled with flaws, cruel and immoral, and is an ineffective means of deterrent
for crime. I understand why you would want to have the death penalty in effect. You probably think
that it will be cheaper to execute people instead of paying taxes for them in jail. There is also a
probability that you think that you will...show more content...
Another flaw is it is morally wrong. No matter how people sugar–coat it, murder is murder, in the
name of justice or in vengeance it is morally wrong. Everyone deserves to live, no matter their
circumstances are. Federal states should not be allowed to decide who lives and who dies,
especially in a country such as the United States, which prides its self on freedom ("Top Ten").
Moreover, the death penalty is applied at random ("Facts"). "The death penalty is a lethal lottery: of
the 15,000 to 17,000 homicides committed every year in the United States, approximately 120
people are sentenced to death, less than 1%" ("Facts"). Many criminals have committed the same
crimes, but few have been sentenced to death for their crimes. In Addition, there is a chance
mentally ill citizens could be convicted to death ("Facts"). According to Amnesty International and
the National Association on Mental Illness, One out of every ten persons who has been executed in
the United States since 1977 is mentally ill. "Many mentally ill defendants are unable to participate
in their trials in any meaningful way and appear unengaged, cold, and unfeeling before the jury"
("Facts"). Many mentally ill defendants have been drugged against their will in order for them to be
competent enough to be executed ("Facts"). Some states still haven't put a ban on executing
mentally ill people such as Organ, although the United States Supreme Court has declared that

Pro Death Penalty Essay
Capital punishment and the practice of the death penalty is an issue that is passionately debated in
the United States. Opponents of the death penalty claim that capital punishment is unnecessary
since a life sentence accomplishes the same objective. What death penalty opponents neglect to tell
you is that convicted murders and child rapists escape from prison every year(List of prison
escapes, 2015). As I write this essay, police are searching for two convicted murders who escaped
from the Clinton Correctional Facility in Dannemora, New York on June 6th, 2015. The ONLY
punishment from which one cannot escape is the death penalty.
Opponents of the death penalty believe capital punishment is unnecessary and inappropriate in our
modern...show more content...
A fifth rationale in opposition is that the death penalty is too expensive or too costly to taxpayers
to justify its use. According to those who oppose the death penalty and certain studies, it costs
more to execute a person than to keep him or her in prison for life (Death Penalty Focus, 2015).
Finally, it is believed by some that the killing at the hands of the state is not a righteous act but
instead is on the same moral level as the murderers themselves.
According to capital punishment supporters, many of these reasons of the anti–death penalty
movement are false and are now wrongly accepted as fact. The argument that the death penalty does
not deter crime is debatable. By executing murderers you prevent them from murdering again. If
these people no longer exist then they obviously cannot commit more crimes. In addition, criminals
have admitted, in thousands of fully documented cases, that the death penalty was the specific threat
which deterred them from committing murder (Pro–Death Penalty, 2014). The opponents of capital
punishment claim that the death penalty has caused and can cause the execution of innocent people.
However, according to the supporters, no evidence indicates that innocent people have been
executed. Upon reviewing 23 years of capital sentences, a Wall Street Journal study indicated that
they were unable to find a single case in which an innocent person was executed (Eddlem, 2002).
Furthermore, advocates note that the

For The Death Penalty Essay

More Related Content

Similar to For The Death Penalty Essay

More from Online Paper Writing Services Haynes

Recently uploaded

For The Death Penalty Essay