Firefighting Systems on Ships
Beyond CO₂ and Water Mist
Technologies
Presented by: [Your Name]
Course: Marine Engineering
Introduction
• - Fire at sea = Major hazard
• - Traditional systems: CO₂ and Water Mist
• - Need for alternatives due to:
• - Environmental regulations
• - Safety during crew operations
• - System limitations (e.g., asphyxiation risk
with CO₂)
Why Look Beyond CO₂ and Water
Mist?
• - CO₂ Systems:
• - Effective, but hazardous for crew (oxygen
displacement)
• - Environmental impact concerns
• - Water Mist:
• - Limited effectiveness on Class B fires
(flammable liquids)
• - Not ideal in electrical spaces
• - IMO regulations and SOLAS updates
Overview of Alternative
Firefighting Systems
• - Inert Gas Systems (e.g., Nitrogen-based)
• - Foam Systems (AFFF, high expansion)
• - Dry Chemical Powder Systems
• - Aerosol-based Fire Suppression
• - Hybrid Gas-Water Systems (e.g., Victaulic
Vortex)
• - Advanced Detection and Integrated Fire
Control
Inert Gas Systems (IGS)
• - Commonly nitrogen or argon blends
• - Reduces oxygen to below combustion levels
• - Safe for equipment, non-conductive
• - Example: INERGEN® (Nitrogen + Argon + CO₂)
• - Used in engine control rooms, switchboards
Foam-Based Systems
• - Used for flammable liquid fires (Class B)
• - Types:
• - AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam)
• - High-expansion foam
• - Applications: Heli-decks, pump rooms, cargo
tanks
• - Advantage: Rapid smothering, cooling, vapor
suppression
Dry Chemical Powder Systems
• - Rapid knockdown of fire
• - Mostly used in local application (engine
spaces, galleys)
• - Common agents: Monoammonium
phosphate, sodium bicarbonate
• - Limited cooling, not suitable for large spaces
Aerosol-Based Suppression
• - Solid compound aerosol generators
• - On fire detection, generators release
microparticles
• - Interrupts chemical chain reaction of fire
• - Compact, low maintenance, ideal for
machinery spaces
• - Popular system: Stat-X®, FirePro®
Hybrid Systems (Gas + Water)
• - Combines inert gas with ultra-fine water mist
• - Example: Victaulic Vortex®
• - Benefits:
• - Rapid cooling
• - Oxygen displacement
• - Low water damage
• - Safe for personnel
Smart Fire Detection & Control
• - Advanced smoke/heat detectors (infrared,
laser)
• - Integrated systems with real-time monitoring
• - Early warning improves response time
• - Auto-triggered localized suppression
• - Interface with ship automation systems
Comparative Table
• System | Key Feature | Best Use | Limitation
• -------|--------------|----------|------------
• Inert Gas | Non-toxic, no residue | Electrical,
control rooms | Not for open spaces
• Foam | Vapor suppression | Fuel spills |
Clean-up
• Dry Powder | Fast knockdown | Local fires |
No cooling
• Aerosol | Compact, effective | Machinery
spaces | Enclosed only
Future Trends in Marine Fire Safety
• - Eco-friendly extinguishing agents (non-GWP)
• - AI-driven fire detection and suppression
• - Portable advanced suppression systems
• - Regulation-driven innovation (IMO, SOLAS
updates)
Conclusion
• - Fire safety is evolving beyond CO₂ and water
mist
• - Engineers must understand strengths/limits
of each system
• - Design and operation choices impact safety
and compliance
• - Innovation will shape next-gen firefighting
aboard ships
Q&A
• Any questions or thoughts?
References
• - IMO Fire Safety Systems Code (FSS Code)
• - SOLAS Chapter II-2
• - Manufacturer brochures (e.g., FirePro,
Victaulic, Stat-X)
• - Technical papers from SNAME, IMarEST

Firefighting_Systems_Ship_Presentation.pptx

  • 1.
    Firefighting Systems onShips Beyond CO₂ and Water Mist Technologies Presented by: [Your Name] Course: Marine Engineering
  • 2.
    Introduction • - Fireat sea = Major hazard • - Traditional systems: CO₂ and Water Mist • - Need for alternatives due to: • - Environmental regulations • - Safety during crew operations • - System limitations (e.g., asphyxiation risk with CO₂)
  • 3.
    Why Look BeyondCO₂ and Water Mist? • - CO₂ Systems: • - Effective, but hazardous for crew (oxygen displacement) • - Environmental impact concerns • - Water Mist: • - Limited effectiveness on Class B fires (flammable liquids) • - Not ideal in electrical spaces • - IMO regulations and SOLAS updates
  • 4.
    Overview of Alternative FirefightingSystems • - Inert Gas Systems (e.g., Nitrogen-based) • - Foam Systems (AFFF, high expansion) • - Dry Chemical Powder Systems • - Aerosol-based Fire Suppression • - Hybrid Gas-Water Systems (e.g., Victaulic Vortex) • - Advanced Detection and Integrated Fire Control
  • 5.
    Inert Gas Systems(IGS) • - Commonly nitrogen or argon blends • - Reduces oxygen to below combustion levels • - Safe for equipment, non-conductive • - Example: INERGEN® (Nitrogen + Argon + CO₂) • - Used in engine control rooms, switchboards
  • 6.
    Foam-Based Systems • -Used for flammable liquid fires (Class B) • - Types: • - AFFF (Aqueous Film Forming Foam) • - High-expansion foam • - Applications: Heli-decks, pump rooms, cargo tanks • - Advantage: Rapid smothering, cooling, vapor suppression
  • 7.
    Dry Chemical PowderSystems • - Rapid knockdown of fire • - Mostly used in local application (engine spaces, galleys) • - Common agents: Monoammonium phosphate, sodium bicarbonate • - Limited cooling, not suitable for large spaces
  • 8.
    Aerosol-Based Suppression • -Solid compound aerosol generators • - On fire detection, generators release microparticles • - Interrupts chemical chain reaction of fire • - Compact, low maintenance, ideal for machinery spaces • - Popular system: Stat-X®, FirePro®
  • 9.
    Hybrid Systems (Gas+ Water) • - Combines inert gas with ultra-fine water mist • - Example: Victaulic Vortex® • - Benefits: • - Rapid cooling • - Oxygen displacement • - Low water damage • - Safe for personnel
  • 10.
    Smart Fire Detection& Control • - Advanced smoke/heat detectors (infrared, laser) • - Integrated systems with real-time monitoring • - Early warning improves response time • - Auto-triggered localized suppression • - Interface with ship automation systems
  • 11.
    Comparative Table • System| Key Feature | Best Use | Limitation • -------|--------------|----------|------------ • Inert Gas | Non-toxic, no residue | Electrical, control rooms | Not for open spaces • Foam | Vapor suppression | Fuel spills | Clean-up • Dry Powder | Fast knockdown | Local fires | No cooling • Aerosol | Compact, effective | Machinery spaces | Enclosed only
  • 12.
    Future Trends inMarine Fire Safety • - Eco-friendly extinguishing agents (non-GWP) • - AI-driven fire detection and suppression • - Portable advanced suppression systems • - Regulation-driven innovation (IMO, SOLAS updates)
  • 13.
    Conclusion • - Firesafety is evolving beyond CO₂ and water mist • - Engineers must understand strengths/limits of each system • - Design and operation choices impact safety and compliance • - Innovation will shape next-gen firefighting aboard ships
  • 14.
  • 15.
    References • - IMOFire Safety Systems Code (FSS Code) • - SOLAS Chapter II-2 • - Manufacturer brochures (e.g., FirePro, Victaulic, Stat-X) • - Technical papers from SNAME, IMarEST