Top Rated Bangalore Call Girls Richmond Circle ⟟ 8250192130 ⟟ Call Me For Gen...
Fans e tratto gastrointestinale
1. FANS e tratto
Gastrointestinale
Attualità ed evidenze
cliniche
Stefano Fiorucci
Università di Perugia
2. NSAIDs related GI side effects
Chronic users in Italy ≈1.5.-2 million
30-40% of patients taking an NSAID
develops dyspepsia
1-3% develop serious GI side effects
with an overall mortality of 2000
patients/year
3. NSAIDs related GI side effects
30-40% of patients taking an NSAID
develops dyspepsia and gastrointestinal
lesions
1-3%/year treatment develop major GI side
effects (bleeding and perforation)
4. Number of deaths
USA 1997
25.000
20187
NUMBER OF DEATH
20.000 16685 16500
15.000
10503
10.000
5338 4441
5000
1437
0
Leukemia AIDS NSAIDs Multiple Asthma Cervical Hodgking
myeloma cancer disease
Wolfe MM et al. NEJM 1999
6. Gastropatia da FANS: fattori di rischio
Fattori di richio definiti
1. Eta’>65
2. Storia di ulcera duodenale o sanguinamento GI
3. Alte dosi di FANS
4. Uso simultaneo di 2 FANS
5. Uso concomitante di corticosteroidi
6. Uso di anticoagulanti
7. Malattie sistemiche severe (cardiovascolari)
Fattori di rischio possibili
• Infezione da H.pylori
• Consumo di alcolici
7. Upper GI lesions: risk
factor and NSAID
structrure
Drug R.R. (I.C. 95%)
Ibuprofen 2.0
Aspirin 2.6 (1.3-2.5)
Diclofenac 2.8 (1.4-2.3)
Sulindac 3.1 (1.6-2.7)
Naproxen 3.2 (1.7-2.9)
Indomethacin 3.4 (1.9-3.1)
Piroxicam 4.8 (2.7-5.2)
Ketoprofen 5.2 (2.7-6.4)
Garcia Rodriguez et al 1995
8. Pathogenesis of NSAID
Gastropathy
Gastrointestinal side effects are
related to the
mechanism of action
(i.e. COX inhibition)
9. Biosynthesis of the Products of Arachidonic Acid
Various Stimuli:
ESTERIFIED ACID Chemical Arachidonic Acid Dexamethasone
ESSENTIAL IN CELL LIPID and Mechanical
FATTY ACID
COOH
Cytokines
e.g., Phospholipids of Cell
Growth Factors
IN DIET Membrane ? Activation of Endotoxin
? Also Triglyceride Phospholipase A2 or Cyclooxygenase-2 or
Other Acylhydrolases Cyclooxygenase-1
Lipoxygenases X X
False substrates: e.g.
COOH
Antiinflammatory Drugs: .
COOH
e.g., Aspirin and
O O
O O .
5, 8, 11, 14- Indomethacin O COOH
Eicosatetraynoic Acid
Dazoxiben, Pirmagrel O
e
Synthas
O COOH O COOH
stacyclin
HOOC
Pro O
Thromb O
O
PGH2 X oxane S
OH
ynthase OOH
PGG2
Isomerases
OH OH
PGI2
Active COOH
Metabolites HYDROLYSIS O HO HO O
COOH COOH COOH COOH O
O
HO OH
TXA2
HO
OH PGE2 HO
OH PGF2α O
OH PGD2 HYDROLYSIS
OH
OH PGDH PGDH COOH
OH
6-keto O HO
Inactive PGF1α COOH COOH HO O
Metabolites β OXIDATION
OH
TXB2
HO OH
HO O O
OH β OXIDATION
O COOH ∆13 REDUCTION ∆13 REDUCTION COOH
HO β OXIDATION β OXIDATION COOH
ω OXIDATION ω OXIDATION O O
O HO HO O
COOH COOH OH
OH
Urinary OH OH COOH
Metabolites 2,3-Dinor- HO HO
COOH
11-Dehydro-TXB2 2,3-Dinor-TXB2
6-keto-PGF1α
O
PGE-M O PGF-M
40% of original ISIS draw
10. The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1982
Sune K. Bergström Bengt I. Samuelsson John R. Vane
Sweden Sweden United Kingdom
Karolinska Institutet Karolinska Institutet The Wellcome
Stockholm, Sweden Stockholm, Sweden Research
Laboratories
Beckenham, United
Kingdom
14. COX-3, a cyclooxygenase-1 variant
inhibited by acetaminophen and
other analgesic/antipyretic drugs:
Cloning, structure, and expression
N. V. Chandrasekharan, Hu Dai, K. Lamar Turepu Roos, Nathan K.
Evanson, Joshua Tomsik, Terry S. Elton, and Daniel L. Simmons
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, Vol. 99, Issue 21, 13926-13931, October 15, 2002
15. NSAIDs and gastrointestinal safety
Development of new safer NSAIDs
•Coxibs
•NO-releasing NSAIDs/CINOD
•Dual COX/5-LOX inhibitor
16. Struttura schematica di COX-1 e COX-2
COX-1 COX-2
sito catalitico sito catalitico
dell’enzima dell’enzima
Valina523,
o Isoleucina523,
n ic o
ido nic
PGH2 ac
h ido
Ar PGH2 ac
h
ido Ar
Ac ido
Ac
Arginina120 “tasca laterale”
Arginina120
17. FANS tradizionali: si legano a COX-1 e COX-2
COX-1 COX-2
sito attivo sito attivo
“ponte salino”
con
Arginina120
“ponte salino”
o
nic
con o
ido Arginina120 onic
rac
h h id
ac
o
A Ar
cid ido
A Ac
18. Coxib: interazione specifica solo con COX-2
COX-1 COX-2
sito attivo
sito attivo
coxib
PGH2 “tasca laterale”
co
o ni
id
a ch
o Ar
id co Arg 120
Ac
Arg
o ni 513
Arg 120 id hido
Ac rac
Hist
90
A
coxib
19. COX-2 selectivity of NSAIDs
Percent inhibition of COX-1 when COX-2 is inhibited by 80%
100
80
60
40
20
0
ox b
e
es m
en
L- DFP
clo ib
xic c
7
na am
xi
id
rin
na
ni ica
33
di cox
ox
ul
co
pi
fe
5,
pr
as
fe
le
74
ro
m
el
ce
ro
m
pi
Warner et al, PNAS 1999
20. NSAIDs SELECTIVITIES FOR COX-1/COX-2
specific
Rofecoxib
> 50-fold
Etodolac
Meloxicam selective
Celecoxib
Nimesulide 5 to 50-fold
Diclofenac < 5-fold COX-2 selective
Piroxicam
Ibuprofen
Naproxen Non selective
Aspirin
Indomethacin
Ketoprofen
-3 0
-2 -1 1 2 3
Log[IC ratio(COX-2/COX-1)]
80 Warner et al, PNAS 1999
21. COX-1 Activity: PGE2 Synthesis in GI Biopsies
Rofecoxib vs. Naproxen x 5 Days
170
160
PGE2 Synthesis ng/gm • min
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
Placebo Rofecoxib Placebo Naproxen
25 mg qd 500 mg bid
Hawkey CJ, Gastroenterology 2001
22. Rofecoxib and Acute Gastroduodenal
Mucosal Lesions after 7 days of
Treatment
% patients with Lanza score > 2
100 94
* †
80 71
* †
60
40
20
8 12
0
Placebo Rofecoxib 250 Ibuprofen 800 Aspirin 650
mg/day mg/8h mg/6h
* P<0.05 vs. placebo.
†
P<0.001 vs. rofecoxib. Lanza et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1999; 13: 761-7
23. Investigator-Reported Thrombotic
Cardiovascular Events in the VIGOR Study
Compared with Phase IIb/III OA Study
3.5
3.0
Cumulative Incidence %
Rofecoxib (VIGOR)
2.5
2.0
1.5
1.0 Naproxen (VIGOR)
0.5
0.0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Months of Follow-up
CARDIOVASCULAR SAFETY PROFILE OF ROFECOXIB: A META-ANALYSIS:
A. Reicin, E. Barr, D. Shapiro - EULAR ORAL PRESENTATION, SAT. JUNE 16: 12:00 -
24. The CLASS study:
RESULTS
P = 0.02
6
Annualized incidence
P = 0.09 49/1384
3.5%
(%)
3
30/1441
20/1384 2.0%
11/1441 1.5%
0.76%
0
Celecoxib NSAIDS Celecoxib NSAIDS
Ulcer Symptomatic and
complications complicated ulcers
25. The CLASS study:
RESULTS
P = 0.49
17/293
6.0%
6 P = 0.02 14/298
Annualized incidence
4.6%
32/1101
3.0%
(%)
3
16/1143
1.3%
0
Celecoxib NSAIDS Celecoxib NSAIDS
Patients not Patients
taking aspirin taking aspirin
35. The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1998
The Nobel Assembly at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, Sweden, has awarded the Nobel Prize in
Physiology or Medicine for 1998 to Robert F Furchgott, Louis J Ignarro and Ferid Murad for their
discoveries concerning "the nitric oxide as a signalling molecule in the cardiovascular system".
Robert F Furchgott, born 1916 Louis J Ignarro, born 1941 Ferid Murad, born 1936
Dept. of Pharmacology, Dept. of Molecular and Medical Dept. of Integrative Biology
SUNY Health Science Center Pharmacology Pharmacology and Physiology
New York UCLA School of Medicine University of Texas Medical
Los Angeles School, Houston
36. Nitric Oxide ( NO) -releasing
derivative of aspirin
NCX-4016
O
ONO2
O
O
O
Aspirin
Wallace JL, Ignarro JL, S. Fiorucci. Nature Reviews: Drug Discovery 1, 375-382 (2002)
37. Synergism between COX inhibition
and nitric oxide formation
Enhance gastrointestinal
Safety
Increase anti-inflammatory activity
Pain control
38. Aspirin NO
Anti-thrombotic
Analgesic
Anti-pyretic COX-1
Anti-inflammatory
Spares mucosa
Reduces mucosal blood flow
blood flow
Loss of mucosal barrier integrity
Gastric mucosal injury Gastric mucosal protection
Fiorucci S., et al Gastroenterology 1999, 116: 1089
45. Nitric oxide as an immunoregulator
• NO suppresses IL-2/IFN-γ gene expression
and enhances IL-4 production
• In APC, NO increases mediators that induce
Th2 differentiation
• NO induces apoptosis in T cells
• NO interferes with selectin-dependent adhesion,
iNOS ko mice develop Th1-dependent
autoimmune disease and Th1-cell reactivity
46. Nitric oxide in autoimmune disease
NO
Thr
IL-12
IL-18
IFNγ
IL-10
Th 1
NO
Hubert Kolb and Victoria Kolb-Bachofen, Immunol Today 1998
Fiorucci et al. Immunol Today, 2002
Fiorucci et al. PNAS, 2002
47. NO-aspirin releases nitric oxide
NO-aspirin Aspirin
DETA-NO NCX-4017
NO concentration (nM)
1800
1500
1200
900
600
*
300
0
0 1 10 100 500
(µM)
Fiorucci S, Mencarelli A, Mannucci R, Distrutti E, Morelli A,
del Soldato P, Moncada S. FASEB J. 2002 Oct;16(12):1645-7.
48. ICE has a key role in inflammation
PRO-IL-1β PRO-IL-18
ICE
IL-1β IL-18
Fiorucci S. Trends Immunol. 2001 May;22(5):232-5. Review.
49. NO-aspirin modulates cytokine release
1000 *** 750
A B *
IL-18 concentrations
IL-1β concentrations
750 * *
500 *
(pg/ml)
(pg/ml)
500
250
250
** **
0 0
C LPS C LPS
NCX Asp NCX Asp
Fiorucci et al. J. Immunol. 2000 ; 165 :5245-54
50. NO-aspirin modulates cytokine release
Aspirin NCX-4016 Aspirin NCX-4016
(caspase 1-like protease)
YVAD cleaving activity
900 120
B
Percent of inhibition
800
C 100
IL-1β concentrations
700
80
600 *
(pg/ml)
500 60
400
*
40
* *
300 *
20
200
* 0
100
0 0.1 1 10 50 100 200
0
Drug concentration (µM)
0 0.1 1 10 100 200
Drug concentration (µ M)
Fiorucci et al. J. Immunol. 2000 ; 165 :5245-54
51. Macrophages
Pro-IL-1β Pro-IL-18
NSAID
NO
COX-dependent
IL-1β IL-18
COX-1 COX-2 TNF-α, IL-8 IFN-γ
↓PGE2 Fiorucci S. Trends in Immunol 2001
Editor's Notes
On the vertical axis is the cumulative incidence of investigator reported CV events with time on the x-axis. In green is the combined NSAID group from the Phase IIB/III studies and orange is the rofecoxib group. Overlaid on top in yellow if the rofecoxib group from VIGOR with the blue showing the VIGOR naproxen group. What you see if that the rates of events in the rofecoxib group from VIGOR and Phase IIb/III and the combined NSADI group are virtually superimposable, the outlier is the naproxen group which appears to have a lower incidence of events compared to the other three groups.
In VIGOR, there were 45 confirmed thrombotic events on rofecoxib and 19 on naproxen. Therefore the relative risk of sustaining a confirmed CV event on naproxen compared with rofecoxib was 0.42 with 95% CI which do not cross 1 which implies statistical significance. Although there was a reduction in confirmed CV events, there was no difference in CV mortality. Seven patients died from a cardiovascular event in each group. If you break these events down by location you can see that the majority of events were cardiac events. The relative risk of sustaining a cardiac event on naproxen compared with rofecoxib was 0.36. Cardiac events drove the analyses. Within the cardiac event category, most of the events were myocardial infarctions and there was a significant reduction in myocardial infarctions on naproxen compared to rofecoxib. To better understand these results we looked at the clinical characteristics of patients with events. We found that the patients who had thrombotic events were those who you would have expected to have events--they were older, there was a higher percentage of males, and close to 80% had one or more CV risk factors