The document summarizes the results of an evaluation of a CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) program from 2012. Students from Italy, Luxembourg, Poland, and Sweden were asked to rate their level of agreement with statements about an English language lesson on a scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree. The statements addressed whether the lesson made English easier to understand, speak, read and write, whether it was more interesting taught in English, and whether students wanted more topics taught in English. Graphs show the responses for each country, with most students agreeing or strongly agreeing that the lesson helped with their English skills and found it more interesting taught in English.