Clinical psychologist Joseph Frey of Augusta, GA, operates a solo practice and is also a partner in Partners in Achievement. Joseph Frey often assesses defendants in and around Augusta, GA, for their competency to stand trial.
Its all about forensic psychiatry aspects of India not very frequently discussed and so a little attempt from me. Its not exhaustive and many more aspects regularly updated should be tallied.
Mental Health on Trial: Part 1 - CompetencyJeffrey Ahonen
This is the first part of a serial presentation on mental health issues in criminal justice, featuring Wisconsin criminal law and procedure. It uses the "2014 Slender Man Case" as a case study vehicle. Part 1 focuses on the issue of competency to stand trial.
Its all about forensic psychiatry aspects of India not very frequently discussed and so a little attempt from me. Its not exhaustive and many more aspects regularly updated should be tallied.
Mental Health on Trial: Part 1 - CompetencyJeffrey Ahonen
This is the first part of a serial presentation on mental health issues in criminal justice, featuring Wisconsin criminal law and procedure. It uses the "2014 Slender Man Case" as a case study vehicle. Part 1 focuses on the issue of competency to stand trial.
Latest Post
dicembre 8, 2011
The Insanity Defense
This article was written as a guest post by Paola Giannetakis, member of the International Research Centre for Investigative Psychology.
View this document in it’s full glory by downloading the pdf here.
What is the Insanity Defense?
The legal defense by reason of insanity is primarily used in criminal prosecutions and is based on the assumption that at the time of the crime, the defendant was not sound of mind, and therefore, was incapable of appreciating the nature of the crime and differentiating right from wrong behavior. Allowing such typology of defense is based on the principle that civilized societies do not punish people who do not know what they are doing or are incapable of controlling their conduct.
Fitness to Stand Trial
The legal system distinguishes between two essential components used to evaluate an individual’s fitness to stand trial: competency and insanity. Competency refers to the capacity of a defendant to assist the case attorney and comprehend the contents of the allegations, while insanity refers exclusively to the mental state of the defendant at the time of the crime. The legal standards for defining insanity vary from state to state and from country to country. For example, in the US, a criminal act is not only regarded illegal, but it must also be accompanied by mens rea (a guilty mind). The defense of insanity derives from the M’Naghten rules in 1843, asserting, “It must be clearly proved that, at the time of committing the act, the party accused was labouring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing, or, if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong.” (Post, 1963). Although the M’Naghten rule is still used, there are limitations.
Conceptualizations of Insanity
There is a twofold conception of the insanity defense. One type of insanity may be defined as “cognitive insanity”, where a defendant was suffering from a mental disease or defect at the time of the crime, which impaired his/her psychological ability to appreciate the wrongfulness of the act. A second type of insanity is based on the concept of “irresistible impulse”, where a defendant is psychologically able to appreciate and distinguish between right and wrong behaviors, but who has suffered from a mental disease leading to an inability to control his/her actions. Is also possible to define insanity as being:
1. Legally determined: the defendant is not considered criminally responsible if, as a result of a mental disorder or defect, he/she lacked the capacity to appreciate his/her misconduct as a violation of the law.
2. Morally determined: the defendant lacks criminal responsibility if, as a result of a mental disorder or defect, he/she lacked the capacity to appreciate his/her misconduct as a violation of what a society deems unethical.
3. Subjectively determine
Corresponding slides to CSLS Socio-Legal Seminar Series for students as Nicholas deB Katzenbach Fellow, New Directions in Socio-Legal Studies, University of Oxford.
Definition of forensic Psychology
History of forensic Psychology
Forensic Psychology in court
Subfields of forensic Psychology
Difference in the function of forensic and clinical psychology
Difference in forensic and clinical assessment
Roles of forensic Psychology
Ethical considerations
Medico-legal responsibilities of mentally ill persons and recent amendments in Mental Health Act 2017, Procedures of restraint or admission of mentally ill person to psychiatric hospital.
Criminal responsibilities : Mc naughten rule, Durham rule, curren's rule
Civil legal proceedings, management of property and custody of his person, consent, business contract, evidence, guardianship, transfer of property, adoption
This lecture slide concerns the accuracy report of eye witness testimony. How accurate are eye-witness testimonials? And how can we interview witness so that their reports can be more accurate? It identifies the 'Cognitive Interview Model' which is a interview approach for increasing accuracy of reports while minimizes false information. One of the main mistake of interviewers are asking misleading questions. For instance, 'did you see the gun?' as opposed to 'did you see 'a' gun?' First part was misleading because it implies that a gun was witnessed when in fact there may not have been a gun present.
Add your comments and questions below.
Board-certified in clinical psychology, Joseph Frey, PhD, practices his profession in the Augusta, GA, area, conducting psychological assessments of adults, adolescents, and children. He also consults with businesses on issues related to management psychology, including career development, competency modeling, and team development and functioning. Dr. Joseph Frey also offers forensic consultations in domestic relations cases, visitation evaluations, and court-ordered custody evaluations.
Latest Post
dicembre 8, 2011
The Insanity Defense
This article was written as a guest post by Paola Giannetakis, member of the International Research Centre for Investigative Psychology.
View this document in it’s full glory by downloading the pdf here.
What is the Insanity Defense?
The legal defense by reason of insanity is primarily used in criminal prosecutions and is based on the assumption that at the time of the crime, the defendant was not sound of mind, and therefore, was incapable of appreciating the nature of the crime and differentiating right from wrong behavior. Allowing such typology of defense is based on the principle that civilized societies do not punish people who do not know what they are doing or are incapable of controlling their conduct.
Fitness to Stand Trial
The legal system distinguishes between two essential components used to evaluate an individual’s fitness to stand trial: competency and insanity. Competency refers to the capacity of a defendant to assist the case attorney and comprehend the contents of the allegations, while insanity refers exclusively to the mental state of the defendant at the time of the crime. The legal standards for defining insanity vary from state to state and from country to country. For example, in the US, a criminal act is not only regarded illegal, but it must also be accompanied by mens rea (a guilty mind). The defense of insanity derives from the M’Naghten rules in 1843, asserting, “It must be clearly proved that, at the time of committing the act, the party accused was labouring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing, or, if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong.” (Post, 1963). Although the M’Naghten rule is still used, there are limitations.
Conceptualizations of Insanity
There is a twofold conception of the insanity defense. One type of insanity may be defined as “cognitive insanity”, where a defendant was suffering from a mental disease or defect at the time of the crime, which impaired his/her psychological ability to appreciate the wrongfulness of the act. A second type of insanity is based on the concept of “irresistible impulse”, where a defendant is psychologically able to appreciate and distinguish between right and wrong behaviors, but who has suffered from a mental disease leading to an inability to control his/her actions. Is also possible to define insanity as being:
1. Legally determined: the defendant is not considered criminally responsible if, as a result of a mental disorder or defect, he/she lacked the capacity to appreciate his/her misconduct as a violation of the law.
2. Morally determined: the defendant lacks criminal responsibility if, as a result of a mental disorder or defect, he/she lacked the capacity to appreciate his/her misconduct as a violation of what a society deems unethical.
3. Subjectively determine
Corresponding slides to CSLS Socio-Legal Seminar Series for students as Nicholas deB Katzenbach Fellow, New Directions in Socio-Legal Studies, University of Oxford.
Definition of forensic Psychology
History of forensic Psychology
Forensic Psychology in court
Subfields of forensic Psychology
Difference in the function of forensic and clinical psychology
Difference in forensic and clinical assessment
Roles of forensic Psychology
Ethical considerations
Medico-legal responsibilities of mentally ill persons and recent amendments in Mental Health Act 2017, Procedures of restraint or admission of mentally ill person to psychiatric hospital.
Criminal responsibilities : Mc naughten rule, Durham rule, curren's rule
Civil legal proceedings, management of property and custody of his person, consent, business contract, evidence, guardianship, transfer of property, adoption
This lecture slide concerns the accuracy report of eye witness testimony. How accurate are eye-witness testimonials? And how can we interview witness so that their reports can be more accurate? It identifies the 'Cognitive Interview Model' which is a interview approach for increasing accuracy of reports while minimizes false information. One of the main mistake of interviewers are asking misleading questions. For instance, 'did you see the gun?' as opposed to 'did you see 'a' gun?' First part was misleading because it implies that a gun was witnessed when in fact there may not have been a gun present.
Add your comments and questions below.
Board-certified in clinical psychology, Joseph Frey, PhD, practices his profession in the Augusta, GA, area, conducting psychological assessments of adults, adolescents, and children. He also consults with businesses on issues related to management psychology, including career development, competency modeling, and team development and functioning. Dr. Joseph Frey also offers forensic consultations in domestic relations cases, visitation evaluations, and court-ordered custody evaluations.
This slideshow overviews careers in forensic psychology with a bachelor's degree and with an advanced degree. Check out Florida Tech's BA in Applied Psychology with a Concentration in Forensic Psychology here: https://www.floridatechonline.com/psychology/ba-applied-psychology-forensic/.
Intelligence TestingWhat is intelligence TestingWha.docxnormanibarber20063
Intelligence Testing
What is intelligence Testing?What first comes to mind, when people hear the word Intelligence testing is the idea of IQ testing. The intelligence normally will define the intellectual potential that a person was born with. According to Matsumoto and Juang (2013) “In contemporary America psychology. Intelligence has generally been considered a conglomeration of numerous intellectual abilities centering around verbal and analytic tasks (p.144)Types of Psychological Testing*Personality Assessment*Behavioral Assessment*Clinical interview*Assessment of Intellectual FunctioningCindy SanchezJune 19, 2018University of Phoenix
These types of psychological assessment, are available for different areas, for example for areas such as aptitude, work or careers counseling, management skills, achievement in school, and career planning.
The Clinical Interview
Clinical interviews usually last up to 1 to 2 hours. Clinical interviews are mostly conducted by mental health professionals for example psychologist, psychiatrists, and social workers can use this method. Using clinical interview, it allows the interviewer to gather information and family data as well as the individual’s life and personal history. Mostly this interview process will allow the interviewer to appropriately diagnose the individual.
Assessment of intellectual Functioning
According to (Framingham, J. 2016) It’s important to note that IQ tests do not measure actual intelligence, they measure what we believe might be important components of intelligence.
The two primary component used to test a person’s intellectual functions are, intelligence test, and Neuropsychological assessment.
Intelligence tests are the more common types administer and include Stanford-Binet and the Wechsler scales. Neuropsychological assessment can take up to 2 days to administer and much more extensive form.Personality AssessmentThis assessment gives a better understanding for the professional to understand the individual’s personality. According to (Framingham, J. 2016) Personality is a complex combination of factors that has been developed over a person’s entire childhood and young adulthood. Personality test gives a better understanding of complexity and rich texture.Behavioral AssessmentBehavioral assessment is defined as observation, or measuring a person’s behavior. This gives a professional a better understanding of the behavior and the thoughts behind the individual, which determine what reinforcing components or what triggers the individual to act a certain way, this will help change them and help them out with their behavioral issues, statistics show that an individual with behavioral issues most likely had a traumatic childhood experience that led them to act a certain way.
Theories Overview
British psychologist named Spearman came up with a theory of intelligence that focused on general intelligence. It focused on mental ability and viewed it as a single, general ability (mat.
Running Head: ASSESSMENTS 1
ASSESSMENTS 4
Forensic assessments
Phyllis Lovering
Argosy Online
Jan.10,2018
Forensic assessmentsThe case scenario selected
In Case 1, police arrested Ms. G and charged her with burglary after finding her with a property belonging to a neighbor. The arresting officers revealed that she was in possession of drug and intoxicated, as well as turned combative in defense that she had committed a crime. They also reported that Ms. G portrayed hostile, belligerent, hyperactive, irritable assaultive and irrational behavior when they approached to arrest her. While incarcerated, she made several claims included that the police planted the drug on her and they wanted to kill her and her brother, and she also initiated a hunger strike among the inmates. Furthermore, she refused any conversation as well as defense counsel and a plea bargain when they were offered to her.Reasons for a referral
The most appropriate forensic assessment for this case is the competency to stand trial. This evaluation allows a forensic mental health professional to determine if a client understands the charges against him or her, the available options and potential sentences (Reed, & Zapf, 2017). In particular, a referral is important to ascertain whether Ms. G really understands the consequences of waiving the right to a defense counsel and refusing plea negotiations. The purpose of the forensic assessment and report
If the forensic mental health professional reports that Ms. G is competent, the court will continue with the trial. Otherwise, he or she should make recommendations regarding the measure that need to be taken so that the defendant can regain competency (Stafford & Sellbom, 2013). For instance, Ms. G may be admitted to a psychiatric hospital until she regains competency. Forensic assessmentsMy impressions of the client
My impressions of Ms. G are that she is irrational and have no factual understanding of the legal process or the charges against her. It is not logic for her to deny having committed a crime with police finding stolen property in her possession. Accepting a plea bargain may have also helped her reduce the risk of a harsher punishment and avoid costs of defending herself at trial (Reed, & Zapf, 2017). My professional role and relationship with the court and the third party
The prosecution or the defense may call upon a forensic psychologist to do psychological assessment and evaluation to determine the mental state of a defendant before conviction or sentencing (Reed, & Zapf, 2017). Depending on the result of the evaluation, the psychologist may be needed to testify in court on whether impaired mental abilities have any impact on the case. Explanation of the hypotheses formulated
The hypotheses for th ...
RESEARCH ARTICLEJuvenile competency to stand trial in crim.docxaudeleypearl
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Juvenile competency to stand trial in criminal court and brain
function
Roni Mayzer
a
*, April R. Bradley
b
, Holly Rusinko
b
and Troy W. Ertelt
b
a
Department of Criminal Justice, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, USA;
b
Department of Psychology, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, USA
(Received 19 September 2008; final version received 21 May 2009)
Current estimates indicate that approximately 200,000 juveniles are
transferred to the (adult) criminal court system each year and it is often
required that the juvenile’s ability to function in adult criminal
proceedings be assessed by a mental health professional. We review
the literature on the assessment of juvenile competency to stand trial in
criminal court, adolescent brain development, and related cognitive
skills. We conclude that integrative developmental theories are needed
to guide research and provide theoretical pathways to apply neuropsy-
chological information to juvenile competency behaviors and the
assessment of these behaviors.
Keywords: adolescence; cognitive functioning; criminal procedure;
developmental; forensic
Over the past decade an increasing number of juvenile offenders have been
moved to the American (adult) criminal court system (Snyder & Sickmund,
1999). While it is difficult to assess the exact number of transferred children
and adolescents, the best available estimates suggest around 200,000 cases
annually (American Bar Association Criminal Justice Section, 2001).
Unfortunately, research indicates poorer outcomes (i.e., higher re-arrest
rates) for those moved to criminal court compared to those who remain in
juvenile court (MacArthur Foundation Research Network, 2006). This has
led to questions about juveniles’ competency to participate in the trial
process in an adult setting. How much do competence-related abilities
depend on developmental maturity in cognitive, social, and underlying
neurological domains? An appreciation of the extent to which juvenile
offenders demonstrate competence-related abilities is crucial in order to
engage in a criminal justice process free from coercion and to design policies
for the adjudication of juveniles appropriate to their developmental level
(Melton, Petrila, Poythress, & Slobogin, 1997).
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology
Vol. 20, No. 6, December 2009, 785–800
ISSN 1478-9949 print/ISSN 1478-9957 online
� 2009 Taylor & Francis
DOI: 10.1080/14789940903174089
http://www.informaworld.com
Increasingly, the field of criminology has also recognized the importance
of developmental perspectives for understanding the etiology of crime and
delinquency. Key theorists (e.g., Moffitt, 1993) have proposed explanations
for life-course-persistent offending which implicate neuropsychological
impairments in executive and verbal functions. However, relatively few
studies have included neuropsychological assessments, and brain imaging
techn ...
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
Car Accident Injury Do I Have a Case....Knowyourright
Every year, thousands of Minnesotans are injured in car accidents. These injuries can be severe – even life-changing. Under Minnesota law, you can pursue compensation through a personal injury lawsuit.
Responsibilities of the office bearers while registering multi-state cooperat...Finlaw Consultancy Pvt Ltd
Introduction-
The process of register multi-state cooperative society in India is governed by the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. This process requires the office bearers to undertake several crucial responsibilities to ensure compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks. The key office bearers typically include the President, Secretary, and Treasurer, along with other elected members of the managing committee. Their responsibilities encompass administrative, legal, and financial duties essential for the successful registration and operation of the society.
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
2. Introduction
• Clinical psychologist Joseph Frey of Augusta, GA,
operates a solo practice and is also a partner in Partners
in Achievement. Joseph Frey often assesses defendants
in and around Augusta, GA, for their competency to
stand trial.
Several competencies must exist in order for a person to
stand trial. Defendants should have the ability to
understand each phase of criminal proceedings,
including Miranda rights, confession, sentencing,
executions, and the appeals process. Testing can help
produce a complete picture of the accused's
comprehension of these and other legal processes.
3. Competency to Stand Trial
• Determining competency presents multi-faceted
challenges, since its presence in one or more areas of
jurisprudence does not guarantee its possession in
others. In order to make a complete finding, evaluators
may take both neuropsychological investigation into
particular cognitive abilities as well as psychological
inquiry into personality traits into account .
The first method works to identify amnesia, dementia, or
other brain injuries. The second focuses on alerting the
court to irrational patterns of behavior and thinking as
well as other psychiatric conditions.