ENDODONTIC INSTRUMENTS
By Muwanguzi Owen
INTRODUCTION
• Instruments play a very important role in the success of a root canal
treatment therefore a basic knowledge of endodontic instruments is
essential.
• General guidelines exist for root canal preparation, but due to the
complex and varied canal anatomy each case presents unique
challenge.
• A variety of instruments are thus available for this purpose.
CLASSIFICATION OF INSTRUMENTS
ISO-FDI (Federation Dentaire
International) grouped root canal
instruments according to their
method of use:
• Group I : Hand use only, for example,
K and H-files, reamers, broaches,
etc.
• Group II : Latch type Engine driven—
same design as group I but can be
attached to hand piece, e.g. Profiles,
Light speed.
• Group III : Drills or reamers Latch
type Engine driven, for example,
Gates-Glidden, Peeso reamers.
• Group IV : Root canal points like
Grossman’s classification
• Function Instruments
• Exploring- Smooth broaches and
endodontic explorers (To locate
canal orifices and determine
patency of root canal)
• Debriding or extirpating-Barbed
broaches (To extirpate the pulp and
other foreign materials from the
root canal)
• Cleaning and shaping- Reamers and
files (Used to shape the canal space)
• Obturating Pluggers, spreaders and
lentulospirals (To pack gutta-percha
PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
• Complete debridement requires instruments to contact and plane all canal walls
• No instrument can fully clean and shape all root canal spaces due to anatomical
complexities.
• Irregular canal spaces often don’t match the round shape of most instruments.
• Stainless steel instruments are relatively flexible and have poor adaptability to
curved canals.
• Nickle-Titanium instruments are more flexible, better suited for fine, curved
canals bur have no significant advantage in irregular canal spaces.
• Effective canal preparation demands skillful and careful use of instruments to
maximize debridement and minimize procedure errors.
HAND-OPERATED
INSTRUMENTS
• Alloys used in manufacturing endodontic instruments include:
1. Carbon steel
2. Stainless steel
3. Nickle-titanium
CARBON STEEL
• These alloys contain less than 2.1% carbon
• Advantage: harder than stainless steel instruments
• Disadvantage: prone to rust and corrosion, and so they can not be
resterilized.
• Example: Barbed broach
STAINLESS STEEL
• Contain 18% chromium, 8-10% nickel and 0.12 percent carbon.
• Advantage: corrosion resistant
• Disadvantages: stiff, prone to fracture, prone to distortion.
• Example: K-file, H-file, reamer
NICKEL TITANIUM
• Contain 55% nickel and 45% titanium
• Advantages: shape memory, super elasticity, corrosion resistant,
softer, and biocompatibility.
• Disadvantages: poor cutting efficiency, they don’t show fatigue before
they fracture.
• Example: NiTi hand files, profiles, protapers
STANDARDIZATION OF INSTRUMENTS BY
INGLE AND LEVINE
• Instruments are numbered from 10 to 100.
• Files are numbered from 15 – 60 with an increment of 5.
• There is an increment of 10 from 60 onwards.
• Cutting blades 16mm in length (L1)
• The diameter of the instrument at tip (D1) is determined by size in
hundredths of millimeters.
• D2 is uniformly 0.32mm greater than D1
• Length of entire file black is 25mm.
MODIFICATIONS IN STANDARDIZATION
• 4 modifications were made
1. Additional measurement at D3, 3mm
from tip (D1)
2. Specification for angles of the tip (75°
± 15)
3. Number 6 and 8 have been added for
increased instrumentation
4. Color coding added for quicker
identification of diameters of files
Broaches and Rasps
Broaches
• There are two types of broach:
smooth broach and barbed broach
• Smooth broaches are used as
pathfinder whereas barbed broach
are used to remove pulp tissue
during root canal treatment.
Rasp
• Similar to barbed broach
• Used to destroy pulp tissue from
canal space (extirpate pulp
tissue)
Reamer
• K-type instrument used to ream
the canals
• It has a triangular blank and
lesser number of flutes than a
file.
• Have same cutting efficiency as
the file
Files
• Instruments used in cleaning and shaping of root canals.
• Used for removing tissue and superficial dentin from the canal wall
• Commonly used files include: K-file, K-flex file, Flexo file, Flex-R file,
Hedstroem file, Safety H-file, S-file
K File
• Triangular, square or rhomboidal
in cross section
• K-file has 1½ to 2½ cutting blades
per mm of their working end.
• Disadvantage: less cutting
efficiency, extrusion of debris
periapically.
K-flex file
• It is rhombus in cross section
having two acute angles and two
obtuse angles
• The acute angles increase
sharpness and cutting efficiency
of the instrument.
• The obtuse angles provide more
space for debris removal
Flexo file
• Similar to K-flex file but with a triangular cross section
• This provides more flexibility and resisting fracture
• Its tip is modified to noncutting types
Flex-R file/Roane file
• Made by removing the sharp
cutting edges from the tip of
instrument.
• This reduces the ledge formation
and canal transportation
• It is made out of NiTi and cuts
during anticlockwise rotary
motion
Hedstroem file
• Has flutes
• Only cuts when the instrument is
withdrawn
• Advantage: better cutting
efficiency
• Disadvantage: lacks flexibility,
tend to fracture and is an
aggressive cutter
C+ file
• Used in difficult and calcified
canals
• Available in size 8, 10, and 15
• Length of 18, 21, and 25 mm.
• Made of stainless steel and has
square cross section
Golden medium file
• Used for narrow canals
• Available in sizes 12 to 37
NONROTARY ENDODONTIC
INSTRUMENTS
Engine Driven Instruments
1. Reciprocating hand piece:
rotates at 3000 rpm
2. Vertical stroke hand piece:
either air or electric driven
Sonics and Ultrasonic
Sonic hand piece
• Uses compressed air
• Sonic hand pieces uses three
types of files which include:
Hello sonic, sharper sonic, and
Rispi sonic
• Have non cutting tip and come in
sizes ranging from 15 to 40.
Continuation
Advantages:
• Better shaping of canal than ultrasonic ones
• Lesser chances of debris extrusion due to constant irrigation
• Produces clean canals
Disadvantages:
• Walls of canal are rough
• Chances of tranpostation are more in curved canals
Ultrasonic hand piece
• They are called endosonics
• Use K-file as a canal instrument
Uses of Endosonics
• Access enhancement: produces smoother shapes of access cavity
• Orifice location: very useful in removal of chamber calcification
• Irrigation: endosonics produce more cleaner canals
• GP placement: GP gets plasticized by friction generated from the
endosonics
ROTARY ENDODONTIC
INSTRUMENTS USED WITH A
HANDPIECE
Slow speed rotary stainless steel instruments
• These include
1. Gates-Glidden bur
2. Flexogates
3. Peeso reamers
Gates-Glidden bur
• Have a flame shaped cutting
point that cuts laterally
• They are used at speed of 750 to
1500 rpm in brush stroking
manner
• Weakest part of it is the junction
of the shank and the shaft of the
instrument
Uses of Gates-Glidden drills
• Enlarge root canal orifices
• For removal of lingual shoulder during
access preparation of anterior teeth
• During retreatment cases or post-space
preparation for removal of gutta-percha
• During instrument removal, for space
preparation
Flexogates
• Are modified gates-glidden
• More flexible for apical preparation
• Form smoother edges and increased removal of debris
• Have a safe non cutting guiding tip
Peeso Reamers
• Rotary instruments for post
space preparations
• Safe no cutting tip
• Used mainly for post space
preparation when gutta percha
has to be removed from
obturated root canal
NITI ROTARTY INSTRUMENTS
Advantages:
• Shape memory
• Superelasticity
• Good resiliency
• Corrosion resistant
• And softer than stainless steel
Disadvantages:
• Poor cutting efficiency
• Don’t show signs of fatigue
before fracture
• Poor resistance to fracture
Generations of rotary instrument
• First generation: Profiles, Quantec
• Second generation: Profile GT
• Third generation: K3, Race protaper
• Fourth generation: V-taper
INSTRUMENTS USED FOR
FILLING ROOT CANALS
Hand spreader
• Made of stainless steel
• Designed to place the accessory gutta-percha points
• Don’t have standard size and shape
• Not used routinely
• They are shorter in length
• Standardized and color coded to match the size of gutta-percha points
• Made from stainless steel or NiTi
Hand plugger
• Larger diameter than the
spreader
• Have blunt ends
• Used to compact warm gutta-
percha vertically and laterally
into the root canal
• Calcium hydroxide or MTA are
also packed into canals using it
Finger plugger
• Used for vertical compaction of
gutta-percha
Lentulo spirals
• Used for applying sealer cements to the root canal walls before
obturation
• Can be used as hand or rotary instruments
Apex locator
Uses
• Measuring the canal length
• Locate the apical foramen
• Enhance accuracy
REFERENCES
• Textbook of Endodontics, Nisha Garg – 3rd
edition
• Principles and practice of Endodontics – 3rd
edition

Endodontic instruments used in root canal treatment

  • 1.
  • 2.
    INTRODUCTION • Instruments playa very important role in the success of a root canal treatment therefore a basic knowledge of endodontic instruments is essential. • General guidelines exist for root canal preparation, but due to the complex and varied canal anatomy each case presents unique challenge. • A variety of instruments are thus available for this purpose.
  • 3.
    CLASSIFICATION OF INSTRUMENTS ISO-FDI(Federation Dentaire International) grouped root canal instruments according to their method of use: • Group I : Hand use only, for example, K and H-files, reamers, broaches, etc. • Group II : Latch type Engine driven— same design as group I but can be attached to hand piece, e.g. Profiles, Light speed. • Group III : Drills or reamers Latch type Engine driven, for example, Gates-Glidden, Peeso reamers. • Group IV : Root canal points like Grossman’s classification • Function Instruments • Exploring- Smooth broaches and endodontic explorers (To locate canal orifices and determine patency of root canal) • Debriding or extirpating-Barbed broaches (To extirpate the pulp and other foreign materials from the root canal) • Cleaning and shaping- Reamers and files (Used to shape the canal space) • Obturating Pluggers, spreaders and lentulospirals (To pack gutta-percha
  • 4.
    PHYSICAL PROPERTIES • Completedebridement requires instruments to contact and plane all canal walls • No instrument can fully clean and shape all root canal spaces due to anatomical complexities. • Irregular canal spaces often don’t match the round shape of most instruments. • Stainless steel instruments are relatively flexible and have poor adaptability to curved canals. • Nickle-Titanium instruments are more flexible, better suited for fine, curved canals bur have no significant advantage in irregular canal spaces. • Effective canal preparation demands skillful and careful use of instruments to maximize debridement and minimize procedure errors.
  • 5.
  • 6.
    • Alloys usedin manufacturing endodontic instruments include: 1. Carbon steel 2. Stainless steel 3. Nickle-titanium
  • 7.
    CARBON STEEL • Thesealloys contain less than 2.1% carbon • Advantage: harder than stainless steel instruments • Disadvantage: prone to rust and corrosion, and so they can not be resterilized. • Example: Barbed broach
  • 8.
    STAINLESS STEEL • Contain18% chromium, 8-10% nickel and 0.12 percent carbon. • Advantage: corrosion resistant • Disadvantages: stiff, prone to fracture, prone to distortion. • Example: K-file, H-file, reamer
  • 9.
    NICKEL TITANIUM • Contain55% nickel and 45% titanium • Advantages: shape memory, super elasticity, corrosion resistant, softer, and biocompatibility. • Disadvantages: poor cutting efficiency, they don’t show fatigue before they fracture. • Example: NiTi hand files, profiles, protapers
  • 10.
    STANDARDIZATION OF INSTRUMENTSBY INGLE AND LEVINE • Instruments are numbered from 10 to 100. • Files are numbered from 15 – 60 with an increment of 5. • There is an increment of 10 from 60 onwards. • Cutting blades 16mm in length (L1) • The diameter of the instrument at tip (D1) is determined by size in hundredths of millimeters. • D2 is uniformly 0.32mm greater than D1 • Length of entire file black is 25mm.
  • 12.
    MODIFICATIONS IN STANDARDIZATION •4 modifications were made 1. Additional measurement at D3, 3mm from tip (D1) 2. Specification for angles of the tip (75° ± 15) 3. Number 6 and 8 have been added for increased instrumentation 4. Color coding added for quicker identification of diameters of files
  • 14.
    Broaches and Rasps Broaches •There are two types of broach: smooth broach and barbed broach • Smooth broaches are used as pathfinder whereas barbed broach are used to remove pulp tissue during root canal treatment.
  • 15.
    Rasp • Similar tobarbed broach • Used to destroy pulp tissue from canal space (extirpate pulp tissue)
  • 16.
    Reamer • K-type instrumentused to ream the canals • It has a triangular blank and lesser number of flutes than a file. • Have same cutting efficiency as the file
  • 17.
    Files • Instruments usedin cleaning and shaping of root canals. • Used for removing tissue and superficial dentin from the canal wall • Commonly used files include: K-file, K-flex file, Flexo file, Flex-R file, Hedstroem file, Safety H-file, S-file
  • 18.
    K File • Triangular,square or rhomboidal in cross section • K-file has 1½ to 2½ cutting blades per mm of their working end. • Disadvantage: less cutting efficiency, extrusion of debris periapically.
  • 19.
    K-flex file • Itis rhombus in cross section having two acute angles and two obtuse angles • The acute angles increase sharpness and cutting efficiency of the instrument. • The obtuse angles provide more space for debris removal
  • 20.
    Flexo file • Similarto K-flex file but with a triangular cross section • This provides more flexibility and resisting fracture • Its tip is modified to noncutting types
  • 21.
    Flex-R file/Roane file •Made by removing the sharp cutting edges from the tip of instrument. • This reduces the ledge formation and canal transportation • It is made out of NiTi and cuts during anticlockwise rotary motion
  • 22.
    Hedstroem file • Hasflutes • Only cuts when the instrument is withdrawn • Advantage: better cutting efficiency • Disadvantage: lacks flexibility, tend to fracture and is an aggressive cutter
  • 23.
    C+ file • Usedin difficult and calcified canals • Available in size 8, 10, and 15 • Length of 18, 21, and 25 mm. • Made of stainless steel and has square cross section
  • 24.
    Golden medium file •Used for narrow canals • Available in sizes 12 to 37
  • 26.
  • 27.
    Engine Driven Instruments 1.Reciprocating hand piece: rotates at 3000 rpm 2. Vertical stroke hand piece: either air or electric driven
  • 28.
    Sonics and Ultrasonic Sonichand piece • Uses compressed air • Sonic hand pieces uses three types of files which include: Hello sonic, sharper sonic, and Rispi sonic • Have non cutting tip and come in sizes ranging from 15 to 40.
  • 29.
    Continuation Advantages: • Better shapingof canal than ultrasonic ones • Lesser chances of debris extrusion due to constant irrigation • Produces clean canals Disadvantages: • Walls of canal are rough • Chances of tranpostation are more in curved canals
  • 30.
    Ultrasonic hand piece •They are called endosonics • Use K-file as a canal instrument
  • 31.
    Uses of Endosonics •Access enhancement: produces smoother shapes of access cavity • Orifice location: very useful in removal of chamber calcification • Irrigation: endosonics produce more cleaner canals • GP placement: GP gets plasticized by friction generated from the endosonics
  • 32.
  • 33.
    Slow speed rotarystainless steel instruments • These include 1. Gates-Glidden bur 2. Flexogates 3. Peeso reamers
  • 34.
    Gates-Glidden bur • Havea flame shaped cutting point that cuts laterally • They are used at speed of 750 to 1500 rpm in brush stroking manner • Weakest part of it is the junction of the shank and the shaft of the instrument
  • 35.
    Uses of Gates-Gliddendrills • Enlarge root canal orifices • For removal of lingual shoulder during access preparation of anterior teeth • During retreatment cases or post-space preparation for removal of gutta-percha • During instrument removal, for space preparation
  • 36.
    Flexogates • Are modifiedgates-glidden • More flexible for apical preparation • Form smoother edges and increased removal of debris • Have a safe non cutting guiding tip
  • 37.
    Peeso Reamers • Rotaryinstruments for post space preparations • Safe no cutting tip • Used mainly for post space preparation when gutta percha has to be removed from obturated root canal
  • 38.
    NITI ROTARTY INSTRUMENTS Advantages: •Shape memory • Superelasticity • Good resiliency • Corrosion resistant • And softer than stainless steel Disadvantages: • Poor cutting efficiency • Don’t show signs of fatigue before fracture • Poor resistance to fracture
  • 39.
    Generations of rotaryinstrument • First generation: Profiles, Quantec • Second generation: Profile GT • Third generation: K3, Race protaper • Fourth generation: V-taper
  • 40.
  • 41.
    Hand spreader • Madeof stainless steel • Designed to place the accessory gutta-percha points • Don’t have standard size and shape • Not used routinely
  • 42.
    • They areshorter in length • Standardized and color coded to match the size of gutta-percha points • Made from stainless steel or NiTi
  • 43.
    Hand plugger • Largerdiameter than the spreader • Have blunt ends • Used to compact warm gutta- percha vertically and laterally into the root canal • Calcium hydroxide or MTA are also packed into canals using it
  • 44.
    Finger plugger • Usedfor vertical compaction of gutta-percha
  • 45.
    Lentulo spirals • Usedfor applying sealer cements to the root canal walls before obturation • Can be used as hand or rotary instruments
  • 46.
    Apex locator Uses • Measuringthe canal length • Locate the apical foramen • Enhance accuracy
  • 47.
    REFERENCES • Textbook ofEndodontics, Nisha Garg – 3rd edition • Principles and practice of Endodontics – 3rd edition