This document contains the prepared remarks and Q&A from Duke Energy's third quarter 2003 earnings conference call on October 30, 2003. Rick Priory, then-CEO of Duke Energy, noted that third quarter results were below expectations due to challenges faced by the DENA business segment. Duke Energy reported GAAP earnings of $0.05 per share and ongoing earnings of $0.35 per share for the quarter, excluding special items. Priory discussed cost reduction efforts that would yield over $200 million in annual pre-tax savings. CFO Robert Brace provided additional details on segment results and $0.30 per share in special items recorded in the quarter.
Duke Energy held its Q2 2003 earnings conference call on July 30, 2003. Fred Fowler, President and COO, reported that Duke Energy has made strong progress in the first half of 2003 through an asset sales program that generated over $1.5 billion, reducing capital spending to $3 billion, and lowering net debt by approximately $1.8 billion for the year. Duke Energy reported Q2 earnings of 46 cents per share including 16 cents from asset sales. For the first half of 2003, Duke Energy reported earnings of 71 cents per share including gains from asset sales and an accounting charge, with benefits from Westcoast earnings and expansion projects offset by lower DENA earnings and higher interest expenses.
This document contains the prepared remarks and Q&A from Duke Energy Corporation's earnings conference call for Q2 2004.
The key points are:
1) Duke Energy reported earnings per share of $0.46 for Q2 2004, which included $0.04 per share in special items. Ongoing earnings were $0.42 per share.
2) The company's largest business segments - Franchised Electric and Gas Transmission - generated solid earnings and cash flows for the quarter. Field Services also had strong results due to high natural gas liquid prices and operating improvements.
3) Duke Energy reduced its mark-to-market trading position, but results were still affected by changing commodity prices
Duke Energy reported third quarter earnings per share of $0.41, which included $0.03 from special items primarily related to additional tax benefits from asset sales. Ongoing earnings were $0.38 per share. Key business segments like Franchised Electric and Natural Gas Transmission reported solid results. Field Services benefited from strong natural gas liquid prices. Duke Energy North America continued working to reduce losses from its merchant energy business. The company has reduced its debt by $2.4 billion year-to-date through asset sales and cash flows. Management expects to meet or exceed its financial goals for 2004 and continues working to improve the company's performance.
Duke Energy held a conference call to discuss its second quarter 2005 earnings. The call included prepared remarks from Chairman and CEO Paul Anderson and Group VP and CFO David Hauser. Key highlights from their remarks include:
- Earnings per share were $0.33, including $0.02 in special items, compared to analyst expectations of $0.38. However, the company was on plan for the year.
- Weather had a negative $0.05 impact on earnings compared to last year. Results were also impacted by higher O&M costs.
- Most business units performed well, though Franchised Electric and DENA saw declines due to weather and other factors.
- The proposed merger with C
The document is the transcript of Duke Energy's Q1 2003 earnings conference call.
In the call, Duke Energy executives discuss the company's financial results and progress on its strategic plan. They report that regulated utilities Franchised Electric and Gas Transmission contributed 94% of earnings. Duke is reducing costs, selling $1.1 billion in assets, and focusing on its strongest businesses. While merchant energy faced challenges, Duke is restructuring to improve results going forward.
This document contains the prepared remarks from Duke Energy's Q1 2004 earnings conference call. The key points are:
1) Duke Energy reported earnings of 36 cents per share including special items, and ongoing earnings of 32 cents, which met expectations despite $6 cents of MTM losses during the quarter.
2) Several business segments performed well, including franchised electric and gas transmission. Field services benefited from higher frac spreads and hedging gains.
3) Challenges included a disappointing quarter for DENA due to inability to capture optionality. However, DENA expects to realize its full-year budget.
4) Duke Energy continues reducing debt and increasing cash, made progress on legal issues,
Duke Energy held an earnings conference call to discuss its first quarter 2005 results. The call included prepared remarks from Duke Energy's Chairman and CEO, Group VP and CFO, and President and COO. They reported earnings of $0.91 per share including special items, and ongoing earnings of $0.44 per share, up nearly 30% from the prior year. Business unit highlights included strong results from Field Services, International Energy, and Crescent Resources. DENA reported a smaller loss than the prior year. The executives provided an outlook for the remainder of 2005 and discussed the impact of recent transactions involving Duke Energy's ownership in Field Services.
This transcript summarizes a Duke Energy earnings call for the third quarter of 2007:
[1] Duke Energy reported ongoing diluted EPS of $0.48 for Q3 2007, an improvement over $0.29 for the same period last year, driven by higher EBIT from its major business segments.
[2] The US Franchised Electric and Gas segment saw an $82 million increase in EBIT year-over-year due to favorable weather, rate reductions ending, and higher wholesale volumes, partially offset by higher costs.
[3] Commercial Power reported higher EBIT of $121 million compared to $57 million last year, from improved margins and Midwest gas plant performance.
[4
Duke Energy held its Q2 2003 earnings conference call on July 30, 2003. Fred Fowler, President and COO, reported that Duke Energy has made strong progress in the first half of 2003 through an asset sales program that generated over $1.5 billion, reducing capital spending to $3 billion, and lowering net debt by approximately $1.8 billion for the year. Duke Energy reported Q2 earnings of 46 cents per share including 16 cents from asset sales. For the first half of 2003, Duke Energy reported earnings of 71 cents per share including gains from asset sales and an accounting charge, with benefits from Westcoast earnings and expansion projects offset by lower DENA earnings and higher interest expenses.
This document contains the prepared remarks and Q&A from Duke Energy Corporation's earnings conference call for Q2 2004.
The key points are:
1) Duke Energy reported earnings per share of $0.46 for Q2 2004, which included $0.04 per share in special items. Ongoing earnings were $0.42 per share.
2) The company's largest business segments - Franchised Electric and Gas Transmission - generated solid earnings and cash flows for the quarter. Field Services also had strong results due to high natural gas liquid prices and operating improvements.
3) Duke Energy reduced its mark-to-market trading position, but results were still affected by changing commodity prices
Duke Energy reported third quarter earnings per share of $0.41, which included $0.03 from special items primarily related to additional tax benefits from asset sales. Ongoing earnings were $0.38 per share. Key business segments like Franchised Electric and Natural Gas Transmission reported solid results. Field Services benefited from strong natural gas liquid prices. Duke Energy North America continued working to reduce losses from its merchant energy business. The company has reduced its debt by $2.4 billion year-to-date through asset sales and cash flows. Management expects to meet or exceed its financial goals for 2004 and continues working to improve the company's performance.
Duke Energy held a conference call to discuss its second quarter 2005 earnings. The call included prepared remarks from Chairman and CEO Paul Anderson and Group VP and CFO David Hauser. Key highlights from their remarks include:
- Earnings per share were $0.33, including $0.02 in special items, compared to analyst expectations of $0.38. However, the company was on plan for the year.
- Weather had a negative $0.05 impact on earnings compared to last year. Results were also impacted by higher O&M costs.
- Most business units performed well, though Franchised Electric and DENA saw declines due to weather and other factors.
- The proposed merger with C
The document is the transcript of Duke Energy's Q1 2003 earnings conference call.
In the call, Duke Energy executives discuss the company's financial results and progress on its strategic plan. They report that regulated utilities Franchised Electric and Gas Transmission contributed 94% of earnings. Duke is reducing costs, selling $1.1 billion in assets, and focusing on its strongest businesses. While merchant energy faced challenges, Duke is restructuring to improve results going forward.
This document contains the prepared remarks from Duke Energy's Q1 2004 earnings conference call. The key points are:
1) Duke Energy reported earnings of 36 cents per share including special items, and ongoing earnings of 32 cents, which met expectations despite $6 cents of MTM losses during the quarter.
2) Several business segments performed well, including franchised electric and gas transmission. Field services benefited from higher frac spreads and hedging gains.
3) Challenges included a disappointing quarter for DENA due to inability to capture optionality. However, DENA expects to realize its full-year budget.
4) Duke Energy continues reducing debt and increasing cash, made progress on legal issues,
Duke Energy held an earnings conference call to discuss its first quarter 2005 results. The call included prepared remarks from Duke Energy's Chairman and CEO, Group VP and CFO, and President and COO. They reported earnings of $0.91 per share including special items, and ongoing earnings of $0.44 per share, up nearly 30% from the prior year. Business unit highlights included strong results from Field Services, International Energy, and Crescent Resources. DENA reported a smaller loss than the prior year. The executives provided an outlook for the remainder of 2005 and discussed the impact of recent transactions involving Duke Energy's ownership in Field Services.
This transcript summarizes a Duke Energy earnings call for the third quarter of 2007:
[1] Duke Energy reported ongoing diluted EPS of $0.48 for Q3 2007, an improvement over $0.29 for the same period last year, driven by higher EBIT from its major business segments.
[2] The US Franchised Electric and Gas segment saw an $82 million increase in EBIT year-over-year due to favorable weather, rate reductions ending, and higher wholesale volumes, partially offset by higher costs.
[3] Commercial Power reported higher EBIT of $121 million compared to $57 million last year, from improved margins and Midwest gas plant performance.
[4
The document is a transcript from Duke Energy's first quarter 2007 earnings conference call.
- Duke Energy reported first quarter 2007 ongoing diluted EPS of $0.30, up from $0.21 in the prior year quarter. Results exceeded internal plans.
- Key drivers included the addition of Cinergy's regulated Midwest assets, improved results at Duke Energy International, and continued strong performance from core regulated businesses.
- Segment results were positively impacted by customer growth, favorable weather, a DOE settlement, and synergies from the Cinergy merger, partially offset by rate reductions related to merger approval requirements.
Sean Casten, President & CEO Recycled Energy Development, LLC
June 23, 2009
US Capitol Building, Room HC-7
Presentation to Efficient Enterprises: Powering American Industry
duke energy 2Q/07_Earnings_Call_Transcript_-_Finalfinance21
This transcript summarizes a Duke Energy earnings call for the second quarter of 2007:
1) Duke Energy reported ongoing diluted earnings per share of $0.25 for Q2 2007, up from $0.24 in Q2 2006, driven by improved results across its major business segments.
2) The U.S. Franchised Electric and Gas segment saw higher earnings due to favorable weather and increased wholesale volumes, partially offset by higher costs and rate reductions.
3) Duke Energy is on track to exceed its 2007 employee earnings target of $1.15 per share and expects Q3 to be its strongest quarter due to seasonal factors.
The annual report summarizes Perini Corporation's financial results for 2005. It highlights that revenues decreased 6% to $1.73 billion due to timing shifts on some projects, but pre-tax income was impacted by a $24.9 million legal charge. Two acquisitions expanded Perini's presence and its backlog reached a record $7.9 billion due to major new project wins in gaming and hospitality. Looking ahead, the company expects continued growth from its building segment and improved margins and earnings from its civil and management service segments.
This document announces and provides information about the 3rd annual "Scaling up through successful investment and cutting edge technology" conference taking place on February 24-25, 2011 in San Francisco. The conference will bring together geothermal experts, developers, investors, utilities and others to discuss opportunities for expanding geothermal energy through investment and new technologies. Over two days, attendees can learn from industry leaders, participate in case studies and debates, and network with over 220 past attendees. Pre-conference training and sponsorship opportunities are also advertised.
NiSource Inc. is a utility company focused on natural gas and electric utilities. It has over 3 million customers across 9 states. In 2002, NiSource focused on strengthening its balance sheet by reducing debt, streamlining operations, and shedding non-core assets. It raised $735 million through an equity offering, using the funds to further pay down debt. NiSource maintained investment-grade credit ratings while improving transparency and adhering to new governance standards. It focused on efficiently operating its regulated gas and electric utilities to serve customers in a high-demand region from Indiana to New England.
Duke Energy reported first quarter 2003 earnings per share of $0.48, driven by favorable weather conditions and increased wholesale power sales in its franchised electric business. However, earnings were lowered by $0.25 per share from exiting proprietary trading activities at DENA and adopting new accounting standards. Duke is focused on reducing risks through asset sales, debt reduction, and exiting merchant energy to strengthen performance and meet its 2003 financial goals.
This document provides an overview of Xcel Energy Inc. for investors attending the EEI International Financial Conference. It summarizes Xcel's business segments, strengths, investment merits, capital investment plans, power supply, environmental commitments, and financial performance. Projections for 2004 earnings per share and cash flow are also presented. Key points include Xcel being the 4th largest US electric and gas utility, a growing service area, low rates, and a goal of providing competitive total returns of 7-9% to shareholders.
The document summarizes Progress Energy's Q3 2008 earnings call. It discusses ongoing earnings of $306M for Q3 2008, regulatory updates in the Carolinas and Florida, energy efficiency and alternative energy programs, and $7-8B in capital expenditures through 2013 for major generation projects. Cost controls have kept year-to-date O&M expenses flat compared to 2007 despite 2.5% reported growth. Customer growth has been positive but milder weather reduced retail usage. Guidance of $2.95-3.05 for 2008 ongoing earnings is maintained based on a trailing 12-month EPS of $2.91. Liquidity remains strong with $1.9B in available credit facilities and cash.
This document provides an overview of Xcel Energy from their presentation at the Edison Electric Institute Financial Conference in October 2003. Key points include Xcel achieving several accomplishments in 2003 including settling with NRG creditors, maintaining investment grade ratings, and refinancing debt. Projections for 2004 include earnings of $1.15-1.25 per share assuming NRG emerges from bankruptcy. The presentation outlines Xcel's objectives, investments, regulatory strategy, and earnings drivers to emphasize the company as a low-risk, integrated utility with a total return of 7-8%.
This document summarizes Xcel Energy's presentation at the Banc of America Securities Energy & Power Conference on November 17-19, 2003. It discusses Xcel Energy's accomplishments in 2003, objectives for investment, earnings growth, and credit ratings improvement. It also provides guidance on projected 2003 and 2004 earnings, cash flows, utility investments, and the expected timeline for NRG's emergence from bankruptcy.
This document summarizes an investor presentation by Xcel Energy on its business operations and financial outlook. It discusses Xcel Energy's integrated utility operations, positive cash flow generation, plans to divest its stake in NRG Energy through bankruptcy proceedings, financial guidance for 2003 including earnings per share, and capital expenditure plans. The presentation also provides comparisons of Xcel Energy's operating metrics to industry peers.
This document provides an overview and summary of a financial conference held by Edison Electric Institute on November 8, 2005. It includes introductory remarks regarding forward-looking statements and safe harbor provisions. The document then summarizes Dick Kelly's presentation on EPS growth targets, dividend increases, and credit rating objectives for 2005-2009. It also provides highlights on rate case filings, capital expenditure forecasts, potential regulatory net income, and earnings guidance ranges.
Duke Energy 4Q/03_Transcript_and_QA_-Finalfinance21
Duke Energy held an earnings call to discuss its financial results for Q4 2003 and the full year. The company reported a net loss of $1.48 per share for 2003, which included $2.76 in special items. Most business segments met their targets except for Franchised Electric, which saw lower earnings due to higher costs. Duke Energy's largest loss was primarily driven by asset impairments and other special charges related to its DENA business. Management provided additional details on special items to help analysts understand the company's ongoing earnings performance excluding these one-time charges.
Duke Energy 02/02/05_prepared_remarks_and_qafinance21
This document provides a summary of Duke Energy Corporation's Q4 2004 earnings conference call. Key points include:
- Duke Energy reported 2004 EPS of $1.59, including special items, and ongoing EPS of $1.38, exceeding its $1.20 target.
- Business units like Field Services and Crescent Resources had strong years. Field Services benefited from higher commodity prices.
- For Q4 2004, Duke Energy reported EPS of $0.38 including special items. Ongoing segment EBIT increased at Franchised Electric and Natural Gas Transmission.
- Guidance for 2005 includes a $150M loss for DENA and $350-500M EBIT for Field Services depending
Duke Energy held an earnings conference call to discuss its third quarter 2006 results. The call included prepared remarks from Jim Rogers, President and CEO, and David Hauser, CFO. Rogers noted results were below expectations due to weaker performance across most business segments compared to the prior year third quarter. Hauser provided more details on financial results, noting lower earnings in franchised electric and gas, natural gas transmission, international, and Crescent Resources segments. However, commercial power results improved due to the addition of Cinergy's nonregulated operations. Overall, Duke Energy expects to achieve its revised 2006 employee incentive target of $1.86 per share.
This document contains the prepared remarks and Q&A from Duke Energy's third quarter 2005 earnings conference call on November 2, 2005. The call covered Duke Energy's financial results for the third quarter of 2005, including segment results for franchised electric, natural gas transmission, field services, international energy, and Crescent resources. It also provided updates on Duke Energy's plans to exit its DENA business and its proposed merger with Cinergy. Key executives discussed drivers of earnings growth or declines across business segments and provided earnings guidance for the remainder of 2005.
The document is the transcript from Duke Energy Corporation's Q4 2005 earnings conference call and outlook for 2006. It includes an introduction by Julie Dill, VP of Investor Relations. Paul Anderson, Chairman and CEO, provides an overview of Duke Energy's 2005 results and progress on the merger with Cinergy. Fred Fowler, President and COO, then reviews the outlook and earnings expectations for each of Duke Energy's business units for 2006.
This document summarizes Duke Energy's and Cinergy's first quarter 2006 earnings conference call. David Hauser, Duke Energy's CFO, discussed the financial results of both companies. For Duke Energy, earnings per share were $0.48, up from the prior year. Segment EBIT increased across most business units due to factors like customer and volume growth. For Cinergy, ongoing earnings per share were $0.62, up slightly from the prior year, while reported earnings were $0.39 due to merger costs. Hauser provided an overview of key financial metrics and outlook for both companies.
This document contains the prepared remarks and Q&A from Duke Energy Corporation's earnings conference call for the second quarter of 2006. Key points:
- Duke Energy reported ongoing EPS of $0.43 compared to consensus of $0.38.
- Financial results were impacted by mild weather, lower bulk power sales, and purchase accounting charges from the Cinergy merger.
- The company achieved several strategic objectives in the quarter including closing the Cinergy merger early and announcing the sale of the Commercial Marketing and Trading business.
- While some business units are performing ahead of plan, overall the company is on track to achieve its $1.90 EPS target for 2006.
The document summarizes the annual general meeting of ZBB Energy Corporation shareholders. It discusses ZBB's forward-looking business statements and risks, introduces the chairman and board of directors, highlights the strong management team, provides an overview of the chairman's address which outlines the company's key projects and partnerships in 2008, and summarizes the results of the shareholder vote to elect directors and appoint auditors.
- Duke Energy held a conference call to discuss its Q4 2006 earnings. The call included the Chairman & CEO, CFO, and other executives.
- Q4 2006 ongoing diluted EPS was $0.43, flat compared to Q4 2005. Full year 2006 ongoing diluted EPS increased 5% to $1.81.
- Results were driven by additions from the Cinergy merger, partially offset by lower results at Crescent Resources.
- Going forward, Duke Energy expects ongoing EBIT of $200 million from its Commercial Power business in 2007. Regulated capital expenditures will primarily focus on the Carolinas and Indiana jurisdictions.
The document is a transcript from Duke Energy's first quarter 2007 earnings conference call.
- Duke Energy reported first quarter 2007 ongoing diluted EPS of $0.30, up from $0.21 in the prior year quarter. Results exceeded internal plans.
- Key drivers included the addition of Cinergy's regulated Midwest assets, improved results at Duke Energy International, and continued strong performance from core regulated businesses.
- Segment results were positively impacted by customer growth, favorable weather, a DOE settlement, and synergies from the Cinergy merger, partially offset by rate reductions related to merger approval requirements.
Sean Casten, President & CEO Recycled Energy Development, LLC
June 23, 2009
US Capitol Building, Room HC-7
Presentation to Efficient Enterprises: Powering American Industry
duke energy 2Q/07_Earnings_Call_Transcript_-_Finalfinance21
This transcript summarizes a Duke Energy earnings call for the second quarter of 2007:
1) Duke Energy reported ongoing diluted earnings per share of $0.25 for Q2 2007, up from $0.24 in Q2 2006, driven by improved results across its major business segments.
2) The U.S. Franchised Electric and Gas segment saw higher earnings due to favorable weather and increased wholesale volumes, partially offset by higher costs and rate reductions.
3) Duke Energy is on track to exceed its 2007 employee earnings target of $1.15 per share and expects Q3 to be its strongest quarter due to seasonal factors.
The annual report summarizes Perini Corporation's financial results for 2005. It highlights that revenues decreased 6% to $1.73 billion due to timing shifts on some projects, but pre-tax income was impacted by a $24.9 million legal charge. Two acquisitions expanded Perini's presence and its backlog reached a record $7.9 billion due to major new project wins in gaming and hospitality. Looking ahead, the company expects continued growth from its building segment and improved margins and earnings from its civil and management service segments.
This document announces and provides information about the 3rd annual "Scaling up through successful investment and cutting edge technology" conference taking place on February 24-25, 2011 in San Francisco. The conference will bring together geothermal experts, developers, investors, utilities and others to discuss opportunities for expanding geothermal energy through investment and new technologies. Over two days, attendees can learn from industry leaders, participate in case studies and debates, and network with over 220 past attendees. Pre-conference training and sponsorship opportunities are also advertised.
NiSource Inc. is a utility company focused on natural gas and electric utilities. It has over 3 million customers across 9 states. In 2002, NiSource focused on strengthening its balance sheet by reducing debt, streamlining operations, and shedding non-core assets. It raised $735 million through an equity offering, using the funds to further pay down debt. NiSource maintained investment-grade credit ratings while improving transparency and adhering to new governance standards. It focused on efficiently operating its regulated gas and electric utilities to serve customers in a high-demand region from Indiana to New England.
Duke Energy reported first quarter 2003 earnings per share of $0.48, driven by favorable weather conditions and increased wholesale power sales in its franchised electric business. However, earnings were lowered by $0.25 per share from exiting proprietary trading activities at DENA and adopting new accounting standards. Duke is focused on reducing risks through asset sales, debt reduction, and exiting merchant energy to strengthen performance and meet its 2003 financial goals.
This document provides an overview of Xcel Energy Inc. for investors attending the EEI International Financial Conference. It summarizes Xcel's business segments, strengths, investment merits, capital investment plans, power supply, environmental commitments, and financial performance. Projections for 2004 earnings per share and cash flow are also presented. Key points include Xcel being the 4th largest US electric and gas utility, a growing service area, low rates, and a goal of providing competitive total returns of 7-9% to shareholders.
The document summarizes Progress Energy's Q3 2008 earnings call. It discusses ongoing earnings of $306M for Q3 2008, regulatory updates in the Carolinas and Florida, energy efficiency and alternative energy programs, and $7-8B in capital expenditures through 2013 for major generation projects. Cost controls have kept year-to-date O&M expenses flat compared to 2007 despite 2.5% reported growth. Customer growth has been positive but milder weather reduced retail usage. Guidance of $2.95-3.05 for 2008 ongoing earnings is maintained based on a trailing 12-month EPS of $2.91. Liquidity remains strong with $1.9B in available credit facilities and cash.
This document provides an overview of Xcel Energy from their presentation at the Edison Electric Institute Financial Conference in October 2003. Key points include Xcel achieving several accomplishments in 2003 including settling with NRG creditors, maintaining investment grade ratings, and refinancing debt. Projections for 2004 include earnings of $1.15-1.25 per share assuming NRG emerges from bankruptcy. The presentation outlines Xcel's objectives, investments, regulatory strategy, and earnings drivers to emphasize the company as a low-risk, integrated utility with a total return of 7-8%.
This document summarizes Xcel Energy's presentation at the Banc of America Securities Energy & Power Conference on November 17-19, 2003. It discusses Xcel Energy's accomplishments in 2003, objectives for investment, earnings growth, and credit ratings improvement. It also provides guidance on projected 2003 and 2004 earnings, cash flows, utility investments, and the expected timeline for NRG's emergence from bankruptcy.
This document summarizes an investor presentation by Xcel Energy on its business operations and financial outlook. It discusses Xcel Energy's integrated utility operations, positive cash flow generation, plans to divest its stake in NRG Energy through bankruptcy proceedings, financial guidance for 2003 including earnings per share, and capital expenditure plans. The presentation also provides comparisons of Xcel Energy's operating metrics to industry peers.
This document provides an overview and summary of a financial conference held by Edison Electric Institute on November 8, 2005. It includes introductory remarks regarding forward-looking statements and safe harbor provisions. The document then summarizes Dick Kelly's presentation on EPS growth targets, dividend increases, and credit rating objectives for 2005-2009. It also provides highlights on rate case filings, capital expenditure forecasts, potential regulatory net income, and earnings guidance ranges.
Duke Energy 4Q/03_Transcript_and_QA_-Finalfinance21
Duke Energy held an earnings call to discuss its financial results for Q4 2003 and the full year. The company reported a net loss of $1.48 per share for 2003, which included $2.76 in special items. Most business segments met their targets except for Franchised Electric, which saw lower earnings due to higher costs. Duke Energy's largest loss was primarily driven by asset impairments and other special charges related to its DENA business. Management provided additional details on special items to help analysts understand the company's ongoing earnings performance excluding these one-time charges.
Duke Energy 02/02/05_prepared_remarks_and_qafinance21
This document provides a summary of Duke Energy Corporation's Q4 2004 earnings conference call. Key points include:
- Duke Energy reported 2004 EPS of $1.59, including special items, and ongoing EPS of $1.38, exceeding its $1.20 target.
- Business units like Field Services and Crescent Resources had strong years. Field Services benefited from higher commodity prices.
- For Q4 2004, Duke Energy reported EPS of $0.38 including special items. Ongoing segment EBIT increased at Franchised Electric and Natural Gas Transmission.
- Guidance for 2005 includes a $150M loss for DENA and $350-500M EBIT for Field Services depending
Duke Energy held an earnings conference call to discuss its third quarter 2006 results. The call included prepared remarks from Jim Rogers, President and CEO, and David Hauser, CFO. Rogers noted results were below expectations due to weaker performance across most business segments compared to the prior year third quarter. Hauser provided more details on financial results, noting lower earnings in franchised electric and gas, natural gas transmission, international, and Crescent Resources segments. However, commercial power results improved due to the addition of Cinergy's nonregulated operations. Overall, Duke Energy expects to achieve its revised 2006 employee incentive target of $1.86 per share.
This document contains the prepared remarks and Q&A from Duke Energy's third quarter 2005 earnings conference call on November 2, 2005. The call covered Duke Energy's financial results for the third quarter of 2005, including segment results for franchised electric, natural gas transmission, field services, international energy, and Crescent resources. It also provided updates on Duke Energy's plans to exit its DENA business and its proposed merger with Cinergy. Key executives discussed drivers of earnings growth or declines across business segments and provided earnings guidance for the remainder of 2005.
The document is the transcript from Duke Energy Corporation's Q4 2005 earnings conference call and outlook for 2006. It includes an introduction by Julie Dill, VP of Investor Relations. Paul Anderson, Chairman and CEO, provides an overview of Duke Energy's 2005 results and progress on the merger with Cinergy. Fred Fowler, President and COO, then reviews the outlook and earnings expectations for each of Duke Energy's business units for 2006.
This document summarizes Duke Energy's and Cinergy's first quarter 2006 earnings conference call. David Hauser, Duke Energy's CFO, discussed the financial results of both companies. For Duke Energy, earnings per share were $0.48, up from the prior year. Segment EBIT increased across most business units due to factors like customer and volume growth. For Cinergy, ongoing earnings per share were $0.62, up slightly from the prior year, while reported earnings were $0.39 due to merger costs. Hauser provided an overview of key financial metrics and outlook for both companies.
This document contains the prepared remarks and Q&A from Duke Energy Corporation's earnings conference call for the second quarter of 2006. Key points:
- Duke Energy reported ongoing EPS of $0.43 compared to consensus of $0.38.
- Financial results were impacted by mild weather, lower bulk power sales, and purchase accounting charges from the Cinergy merger.
- The company achieved several strategic objectives in the quarter including closing the Cinergy merger early and announcing the sale of the Commercial Marketing and Trading business.
- While some business units are performing ahead of plan, overall the company is on track to achieve its $1.90 EPS target for 2006.
The document summarizes the annual general meeting of ZBB Energy Corporation shareholders. It discusses ZBB's forward-looking business statements and risks, introduces the chairman and board of directors, highlights the strong management team, provides an overview of the chairman's address which outlines the company's key projects and partnerships in 2008, and summarizes the results of the shareholder vote to elect directors and appoint auditors.
- Duke Energy held a conference call to discuss its Q4 2006 earnings. The call included the Chairman & CEO, CFO, and other executives.
- Q4 2006 ongoing diluted EPS was $0.43, flat compared to Q4 2005. Full year 2006 ongoing diluted EPS increased 5% to $1.81.
- Results were driven by additions from the Cinergy merger, partially offset by lower results at Crescent Resources.
- Going forward, Duke Energy expects ongoing EBIT of $200 million from its Commercial Power business in 2007. Regulated capital expenditures will primarily focus on the Carolinas and Indiana jurisdictions.
Spectra Energy reported strong financial results for the third quarter of 2008. The company's ongoing earnings per share increased 29% compared to the third quarter of 2007. All of Spectra Energy's business segments performed well due to solid execution of expansion projects and strong commodity prices. However, commodity prices have declined significantly recently. Spectra Energy is well positioned to manage through current market volatility due to its portfolio of smaller expansion projects, strong liquidity position, and consistent cash flows. The company remains on track to exceed its 2008 earnings target and is confident in its ability to continue delivering value to shareholders.
The United States premier Solar Energy Investment & Finance Summit. Back for its second edition in 2009, secure investment and finance for your solar projects in 2009 and beyond
The document is Southern Company's 2005 annual report. It provides an overview of the company's financial performance in 2005, highlights from the CEO's letter to shareholders, and summaries of key issues discussed by the CEO including the federal energy policy act, industry consolidation, the future of nuclear power, environmental performance, and making the right choices to meet long-term energy needs.
The document reviews Duke Energy's 2005 financial results, provides an outlook for 2006 earnings per share of $1.90, and details expected 2006 capital expenditures of $4.325 billion as the company integrates Cinergy operations following their planned merger. Key assumptions for 2006 include normal weather, sales growth, and $140 million in annual merger savings beginning in mid-2006.
Solar Project Finance: Turning Sunlight Into Green Rick Borry
Learn more at: http://www.principalsolarinstitute.org/webinar/566
How do you pay for large-scale solar power plants when you need millions to start building, but receive payout over decades? Serious solar energy finance professionals will want to hear structured asset finance and valuation expert Ken Kramer present and answer questions about renewable energy project financing concepts applicable to utility scale solar projects, with a focus on US projects utilizing tax-oriented financing structures.
Ken will describe the mechanics and market participants involved in non-recourse project financing. He will also review currently available US Federal tax benefits for renewable energy projects and tax-efficient transaction structures that have evolved to utilize those benefits. Valuation issues associated with these structures will also be covered.
Students at Cornell and Columbia have recently had the opportunity to hear Ken lecture on this topic. This FREE webinar is your chance to do the same, plus attend the LIVE webinar to find out how to employ these concepts in your 2013 business strategy when Ken answers your questions during a LIVE Q & A segment following his presentation.
The document provides an overview of an analyst meeting held by El Paso Corporation on April 16, 2008. It includes cautionary statements about forward-looking projections, outlines the schedule of presentations on topics such as the macro outlook, pipelines, exploration and production, and financials. It also discusses El Paso's purpose and culture, and components of its net asset value. The meeting aimed to provide investors with information on El Paso's businesses and outlook.
The document provides an overview of an analyst meeting held by El Paso Corporation on April 16, 2008. It includes cautionary statements about forward-looking projections, discusses the company's strategy and components of its net asset value. It also examines trends in North American natural gas demand and supply, including increased demand from power generation, a potential decline in Canadian gas exports, and the role of liquefied natural gas imports. Key issues covered include the competitiveness of gas versus coal for power, uncertainty around gas from the Mackenzie Delta, and the interaction of global and North American gas markets.
spectra energy Q307EarningsCall_110607_transcriptfinance49
Spectra Energy's Third-Quarter 2007 Earnings Review Conference Call Transcript:
[1] Spectra Energy reported strong third quarter 2007 results with net income up 32% from the prior year. [2] The company is on track to meet its 2007 financial targets and capital expansion goals. [3] Spectra Energy discussed strong performance across its business segments and an outlook for continued growth driven by expansion projects coming online in 2008.
This document summarizes a New York investor meeting held by Xcel Energy on November 29, 2005. The presentation outlines Xcel's strategy of investing in regulated utility assets to earn its allowed rate of return and achieve earnings growth targets. It highlights Xcel's financial performance objectives and discusses its investments in infrastructure, environmental stewardship, and supportive regulatory treatment across its utility territories. The presentation also reviews Xcel's operational focus and organizational structure.
This document summarizes a New York investor meeting held by Xcel Energy on November 29, 2005. The presentation outlines Xcel's strategy of investing in regulated utility assets to earn the allowed rate of return and deliver earnings per share growth of 5-7% annually. It highlights Xcel's environmental stewardship through renewable energy initiatives and discusses regulatory support for major projects. The organizational structure and roles of key executives are also summarized.
This document summarizes a New York investor meeting held by Xcel Energy on November 29, 2005. The presentation outlines Xcel's strategy of investing in regulated utility assets to earn its allowed rate of return and achieve earnings growth targets. It highlights Xcel's financial performance objectives and discusses its investments in transmission, distribution and customer service. The presentation also provides details on Xcel's construction program, environmental stewardship initiatives, and supportive regulatory treatment across its utility territories.
ConAgra Foods is selling its chicken business to focus on branded and value-added food items. The sale includes chicken processing operations and will generate cash for ConAgra to reinvest. ConAgra will receive Class A shares in Pilgrim's Pride, the chicken company acquiring its business, representing 7% of voting shares and 49% of equity. It can sell up to 1/3 of these shares annually but expects to reduce ownership over time based on market conditions. ConAgra will also receive notes from Pilgrim's Pride due in 2011 with a 10.5% interest rate to be paid semi-annually.
This document summarizes the Q1 FY2004 earnings results of a large packaged foods company. Key points include:
- Q1 EPS was $0.37 compared to $0.43 in Q1 FY2003, impacted by various one-time gains and losses.
- Packaged foods sales were down $168M excluding divested businesses, with a 5% volume decline.
- Several major brands saw growth, while others like Butterball declined.
- Corporate expenses increased due to litigation expenses from a past joint venture.
- The effective tax rate for FY2004 is estimated at 38%.
ConAgra Foods is selling its United Agri Products business to focus on branded and value-added products, as part of a broader strategy of divesting non-core businesses over the past year including fresh beef/pork, canned seafood, and cheese operations. The sale is expected to close by December 31, 2003 for cash and $60-75 million in preferred stock. ConAgra will retain some international UAP operations generating $250 million in annual sales, concentrated in several countries. Proceeds will be used for debt paydown and general corporate purposes including acquisitions and stock buybacks.
ConAgra Foods divested its poultry business to focus on branded, value-added foods with strong margins and growth. The $300 million cash and 25 million Pilgrim's Pride shares valued at $245 million totaled less than the poultry business' estimated $545 million book value due to the shares being valued based on past prices, not current prices. ConAgra Foods can sell up to 1/3 of the shares each year and account for shares eligible for resale within a year as securities, and other shares using cost accounting. The poultry business was previously reported in Meat Processing but is now in Discontinued Operations.
ConAgra Foods completed the divestiture of its chicken processing and crop inputs businesses, finalizing its strategy to focus on branded, value-added food opportunities. The company received $300 million in cash and 25 million shares of Pilgrim's Pride stock worth $245 million for the chicken business. ConAgra can sell up to 1/3 of the Pilgrim's Pride shares per year and will account for the shares as securities held for resale within one year or using the cost method if the eligibility for resale is over one year away. The chicken business was previously reported as part of ConAgra's Meat Processing segment but is now in Discontinued Operations.
ConAgra Foods has divested several commodity businesses and acquired branded and value-added food products to focus on higher margin businesses. The company is planning a share repurchase program using cash from strong operating cash flows and recent divestitures. ConAgra expects to continue investing in growth through acquisitions and paying down debt while deploying cash to dividends, debt repayment, and share repurchases as appropriate.
The document provides a Q&A summary of ConAgra Foods' financial results for Q2 FY04 compared to Q2 FY03. Key points include:
- Q2 FY04 diluted EPS was $0.51 compared to $0.44 in Q2 FY03, impacted by $0.04 in discontinued operations in FY04 and $0.03 in divestiture expenses in FY03.
- Sales comparability was impacted by $506M in divested fresh meat businesses in FY03 and $154M in divested canned food businesses in FY03.
- Examples of brand sales growth included Banquet, Chef Boyardee, Egg Beaters
Packaged Foods sales increased 4% excluding divestitures, with 2% volume growth. Several brands posted sales growth including Armour, Banquet, and Blue Bonnet, while others like ACT II and Butterball declined. Sales comparability was affected by $155 million in divested businesses last year. Operating profit grew 5% in Packaged Foods and 10% overall when adjusting for divested businesses and cost savings initiatives. The company is implementing cost cutting measures expected to save more than implementation costs in the future.
The document provides the quarterly and annual financial results for a company. Some key highlights include:
- Several consumer brands posted sales growth for the quarter including Banquet, Blue Bonnet, and Chef Boyardee, while others like ACT II and Eckrich saw declines.
- Total depreciation and amortization was around $93 million for the quarter and $352 million for the fiscal year.
- Capital expenditures were around $106 million for the quarter and $352 million for the fiscal year.
- Net interest expense was $80 million for the quarter and $275 million for the fiscal year.
- Corporate expenses were around $95 million for the quarter and $342 million
- Major brands in the Retail Products segment that posted sales growth included ACT II, Armour, Banquet, and Blue Bonnet. Brands that posted sales declines included Healthy Choice, Slim Jim, and Snack Pack.
- Retail volume increased 8% while foodservice volume was flat excluding divested businesses.
- Increased input costs negatively impacted operating profits in the Retail Products segment by approximately $45 million.
- Capital expenditures were approximately $105 million, reflecting increased investment in information systems.
This document contains the questions and answers from ConAgra Foods' Q2 FY2005 earnings call. Some key details include:
- Several major brands in the Retail Products segment posted sales growth, while others saw declines.
- Retail volume increased 7% and Foodservice volume decreased 1% excluding divested businesses.
- Capital expenditures increased significantly year-over-year due to investments in information systems.
- The company received proceeds from the sale of its minority interest in Swift Foods and shares of Pilgrim's Pride stock.
This document summarizes the Q3 2005 earnings results of a major food company. Some key highlights include: 1) Major brands in the Retail Products segment saw mixed sales results, with growth for brands like Chef Boyardee but declines for brands like Butterball. 2) Unit volumes declined 3% for Retail Products but increased 4% for Foodservice Products. 3) The packaged meats operations were slightly profitable but profits were over $45 million lower than the previous year. The company expects some improvement but not year-over-year profit gains for packaged meats in Q4.
This document summarizes ConAgra Foods' earnings results for fiscal year 2005 (FY05) in a question and answer format. Some key details include:
- FY05 diluted EPS was $1.23, including $0.12 in expenses that impacted comparability.
- Major brands in the Retail Products segment that saw sales growth included ACT II, Banquet, and Blue Bonnet. Brands that saw declines included Armour and Butterball.
- Retail Products volume increased 2% while Foodservice Products volume decreased 2% in Q4.
- Total depreciation and amortization was approximately $351 million for FY05 and $90 million for Q4. Capital expenditures
The document provides the questions and answers from the Q1 FY06 earnings call for ConAgra Foods. Some key details from the summary include:
- Sales grew for major brands like Butterball but declined for brands like ACT II. Retail Products volume declined 3% while Foodservice increased 4%.
- Depreciation and amortization was $89 million. Capital expenditures were $71 million and net interest expense was $68 million. Corporate expense was $73 million.
- Gross margin was 21.6% and operating margin was 10.9%. The effective tax rate for FY06 is estimated to be 36%.
Major brands in the Retail Products segment that posted sales growth included ACT II, Blue Bonnet, Butterball, Kid Cuisine, Marie Callender's, Reddi-wip and Ro*Tel. Brands that posted sales declines included Armour, Banquet, Cook's, DAVID, Eckrich, Egg Beaters, Healthy Choice, Hebrew National, Hunt's, LaChoy, Orville Redenbacher, PAM, Parkay, Peter Pan, Slim Jim, Snack Pack, Swiss Miss, Van Camp's and Wesson. Retail Products volume declined 5% for the quarter while Foodservice Products volume increased 2%. Corporate expense for the quarter was approximately $103 million
The document provides financial information from ConAgra Foods' Q3 FY06 quarterly earnings call. Some key details include:
- Retail segment sales grew 4% and Foodservice grew 1% over the prior year. Several major brands posted sales growth while others declined.
- Gross margin was 24.8% and operating margin was 12.5% for the quarter.
- Net debt was $3.6 billion, down from $4.5 billion a year prior due to debt repayment of $500 million during the quarter.
- Capital expenditures for the quarter and fiscal year-to-date were below prior year levels. Projected fiscal year expenditures are up to $400
- Major brands in the Consumer Foods segment that posted sales growth in Q4 FY06 included Blue Bonnet, Chef Boyardee, DAVID, Egg Beaters, Hebrew National, and Hunt's. Brands that posted sales declines included ACT II, Banquet, Healthy Choice, Peter Pan, Slim Jim, Snack Pack, and Van Camp's.
- Consumer Foods volume declined 2% in Q4 while Food and Ingredients volume increased 1%.
- Total depreciation and amortization for Q4 was approximately $85 million and approximately $353 million for all of FY06. Capital expenditures were approximately $92 million for Q4 and $288 million for FY
This document summarizes the Q1 FY07 financial results of ConAgra Foods. Some key highlights include:
- Consumer Foods volume increased 1% and Food and Ingredients volume increased 2% in Q1.
- Gross margin was 24.7% and operating margin was 11.7% for the quarter.
- Net debt decreased to $2.88 billion from $3.97 billion in Q1 FY06.
- Restructuring charges totaled $39 million pre-tax, impacting costs in Consumer Foods and corporate expenses.
Major brands in the Consumer Foods segment that posted sales growth included Egg Beaters, Healthy Choice, and Slim Jim. Brands that posted sales declines included ACT II and Blue Bonnet. Total depreciation and amortization from continuing operations was $88 million for the quarter and $177 million year-to-date. Capital expenditures were $66 million for the quarter and $111 million year-to-date. Net interest expense was $52 million for the quarter and $110 million year-to-date.
1) Several major brands in the Consumer Foods segment posted sales growth for the quarter, while others like ACT II and Banquet saw declines. Overall, Consumer Foods volume declined 1% excluding divested businesses.
2) Total depreciation and amortization from continuing operations was around $91 million for the quarter and $268 million year-to-date. Capital expenditures were around $147 million for the quarter and $258 million year-to-date.
3) The company's net debt at the end of the quarter was around $3 billion, with a net debt to total capital ratio of 39%.
TEST BANK Principles of cost accounting 17th edition edward j vanderbeck mari...Donc Test
TEST BANK Principles of cost accounting 17th edition edward j vanderbeck maria r mitchell.docx
TEST BANK Principles of cost accounting 17th edition edward j vanderbeck maria r mitchell.docx
TEST BANK Principles of cost accounting 17th edition edward j vanderbeck maria r mitchell.docx
Fabular Frames and the Four Ratio ProblemMajid Iqbal
Digital, interactive art showing the struggle of a society in providing for its present population while also saving planetary resources for future generations. Spread across several frames, the art is actually the rendering of real and speculative data. The stereographic projections change shape in response to prompts and provocations. Visitors interact with the model through speculative statements about how to increase savings across communities, regions, ecosystems and environments. Their fabulations combined with random noise, i.e. factors beyond control, have a dramatic effect on the societal transition. Things get better. Things get worse. The aim is to give visitors a new grasp and feel of the ongoing struggles in democracies around the world.
Stunning art in the small multiples format brings out the spatiotemporal nature of societal transitions, against backdrop issues such as energy, housing, waste, farmland and forest. In each frame we see hopeful and frightful interplays between spending and saving. Problems emerge when one of the two parts of the existential anaglyph rapidly shrinks like Arctic ice, as factors cross thresholds. Ecological wealth and intergenerational equity areFour at stake. Not enough spending could mean economic stress, social unrest and political conflict. Not enough saving and there will be climate breakdown and ‘bankruptcy’. So where does speculative design start and the gambling and betting end? Behind each fabular frame is a four ratio problem. Each ratio reflects the level of sacrifice and self-restraint a society is willing to accept, against promises of prosperity and freedom. Some values seem to stabilise a frame while others cause collapse. Get the ratios right and we can have it all. Get them wrong and things get more desperate.
Falcon stands out as a top-tier P2P Invoice Discounting platform in India, bridging esteemed blue-chip companies and eager investors. Our goal is to transform the investment landscape in India by establishing a comprehensive destination for borrowers and investors with diverse profiles and needs, all while minimizing risk. What sets Falcon apart is the elimination of intermediaries such as commercial banks and depository institutions, allowing investors to enjoy higher yields.
13 Jun 24 ILC Retirement Income Summit - slides.pptxILC- UK
ILC's Retirement Income Summit was hosted by M&G and supported by Canada Life. The event brought together key policymakers, influencers and experts to help identify policy priorities for the next Government and ensure more of us have access to a decent income in retirement.
Contributors included:
Jo Blanden, Professor in Economics, University of Surrey
Clive Bolton, CEO, Life Insurance M&G Plc
Jim Boyd, CEO, Equity Release Council
Molly Broome, Economist, Resolution Foundation
Nida Broughton, Co-Director of Economic Policy, Behavioural Insights Team
Jonathan Cribb, Associate Director and Head of Retirement, Savings, and Ageing, Institute for Fiscal Studies
Joanna Elson CBE, Chief Executive Officer, Independent Age
Tom Evans, Managing Director of Retirement, Canada Life
Steve Groves, Chair, Key Retirement Group
Tish Hanifan, Founder and Joint Chair of the Society of Later life Advisers
Sue Lewis, ILC Trustee
Siobhan Lough, Senior Consultant, Hymans Robertson
Mick McAteer, Co-Director, The Financial Inclusion Centre
Stuart McDonald MBE, Head of Longevity and Democratic Insights, LCP
Anusha Mittal, Managing Director, Individual Life and Pensions, M&G Life
Shelley Morris, Senior Project Manager, Living Pension, Living Wage Foundation
Sarah O'Grady, Journalist
Will Sherlock, Head of External Relations, M&G Plc
Daniela Silcock, Head of Policy Research, Pensions Policy Institute
David Sinclair, Chief Executive, ILC
Jordi Skilbeck, Senior Policy Advisor, Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association
Rt Hon Sir Stephen Timms, former Chair, Work & Pensions Committee
Nigel Waterson, ILC Trustee
Jackie Wells, Strategy and Policy Consultant, ILC Strategic Advisory Board
The Rise and Fall of Ponzi Schemes in America.pptxDiana Rose
Ponzi schemes, a notorious form of financial fraud, have plagued America’s investment landscape for decades. Named after Charles Ponzi, who orchestrated one of the most infamous schemes in the early 20th century, these fraudulent operations promise high returns with little or no risk, only to collapse and leave investors with significant losses. This article explores the nature of Ponzi schemes, notable cases in American history, their impact on victims, and measures to prevent falling prey to such scams.
Understanding Ponzi Schemes
A Ponzi scheme is an investment scam where returns are paid to earlier investors using the capital from newer investors, rather than from legitimate profit earned. The scheme relies on a constant influx of new investments to continue paying the promised returns. Eventually, when the flow of new money slows down or stops, the scheme collapses, leaving the majority of investors with substantial financial losses.
Historical Context: Charles Ponzi and His Legacy
Charles Ponzi is the namesake of this deceptive practice. In the 1920s, Ponzi promised investors in Boston a 50% return within 45 days or 100% return in 90 days through arbitrage of international reply coupons. Initially, he paid returns as promised, not from profits, but from the investments of new participants. When his scheme unraveled, it resulted in losses exceeding $20 million (equivalent to about $270 million today).
Notable American Ponzi Schemes
1. Bernie Madoff: Perhaps the most notorious Ponzi scheme in recent history, Bernie Madoff’s fraud involved $65 billion. Madoff, a well-respected figure in the financial industry, promised steady, high returns through a secretive investment strategy. His scheme lasted for decades before collapsing in 2008, devastating thousands of investors, including individuals, charities, and institutional clients.
2. Allen Stanford: Through his company, Stanford Financial Group, Allen Stanford orchestrated a $7 billion Ponzi scheme, luring investors with fraudulent certificates of deposit issued by his offshore bank. Stanford promised high returns and lavish lifestyle benefits to his investors, which ultimately led to a 110-year prison sentence for the financier in 2012.
3. Tom Petters: In a scheme that lasted more than a decade, Tom Petters ran a $3.65 billion Ponzi scheme, using his company, Petters Group Worldwide. He claimed to buy and sell consumer electronics, but in reality, he used new investments to pay off old debts and fund his extravagant lifestyle. Petters was convicted in 2009 and sentenced to 50 years in prison.
4. Eric Dalius and Saivian: Eric Dalius, a prominent figure behind Saivian, a cashback program promising high returns, is under scrutiny for allegedly orchestrating a Ponzi scheme. Saivian enticed investors with promises of up to 20% cash back on everyday purchases. However, investigations suggest that the returns were paid using new investments rather than legitimate profits. The collapse of Saivian l
KYC Compliance: A Cornerstone of Global Crypto Regulatory FrameworksAny kyc Account
This presentation explores the pivotal role of KYC compliance in shaping and enforcing global regulations within the dynamic landscape of cryptocurrencies. Dive into the intricate connection between KYC practices and the evolving legal frameworks governing the crypto industry.
1. PREPARED REMARKS AND Q&A
Q3 2003 Duke Energy Earnings Conference Call October 30, 2003
CORPORATE PARTICIPANTS PRESENTATION
Greg Ebel
Duke Energy Corporation - VP, Investor & Shareholder Relations
Rick Priory Operator
Duke Energy Corporation – CEO & Chairman
Robert Brace Good day, everyone and welcome to the Duke Energy third
Duke Energy Corporation – Executive VP & CFO quarter earnings conference call. This call is being recorded.
Rob Ladd
At this time for opening remarks, I would like to turn the
Duke Energy Corporation - President, Duke Energy North
conference over to the Vice President of Investor and Shareholder
America
Relations for Duke Energy, Mr. Greg Ebel. Mr. Ebel, please go
Fred Fowler
ahead sir.
Duke Energy Corporation – President & COO
Ruth Shaw
Greg Ebel - Duke Energy Corporation - VP, Investor &
Duke Energy Corporation - President, Duke Power
Shareholder Relations
David Hauser
Duke Energy Corporation – Senior VP & Corporate Treasurer
Good morning and thank you for joining us. With me today are
Duke Energy’s CEO Rick Priory, our COO Fred Fowler, CFO
CONFERENCE CALL PARTICIPANTS
Robert Brace, Rob Ladd, who is President of Duke Energy North
Ashar Khan
America and David Hauser, our corporate Treasurer. Today we
Foresight Investment - Analyst
will provide you with an overview of Duke Energy’s third quarter
Dan Eggers
results. This call is being webcast on our website at www.duke-
Credit Suisse First Boston - Analyst
energy.com and a copy of the slides is available for download in
Kit Konolige
Morgan Stanley - Analyst the investor section of our website. Before we begin, I‘d like to
review our Safe Harbor Statement:
Paul Patterson
Glen Rock Associates - Analyst
Some of the things we will discuss in today's call concerning future
James Pringle
company performance will be forward-looking statements within
Giovine Capital Group. - Analyst
the meaning of the securities laws. Actual results may materially
Maureen Howe
RBC Capital Markets – Analyst differ from those discussed in these forward-looking statements,
and you should refer to the additional information contained in our
Ali Agha
Burnham Securities – Analyst SEC filings concerning factors that could cause those results to be
different than contemplated in today’s discussion.
Jay Dobson
Deutsche Bank - Analyst
In addition, today’s discussion may include certain non-GAAP
Carol Coale financial measures as defined under SEC Regulation G. In such an
Prudential Securities - Analyst
event, a reconciliation of those measures to the most directly
comparable GAAP measures will be made available on our
investor relations website at www.duke-
energy.com/decorp/gaap.html. We will begin today’s call with
our prepared remarks and then open the lines to take your
questions. I will now turn the call over to Mr. Priory.
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman&
Chairman
1
2. PREPARED REMARKS AND Q&A
Q3 2003 Duke Energy Earnings Conference Call October 30, 2003
Good morning. Thanks for being with us. Condolences to our DENA continues to face challenges and adding to the problem of
friends in New York on the World Series outcome. The Yankees over-capacity in the industry, was adversely affected by mild
played hard! weather and low regional spark spreads in the third quarter. Rob
Ladd will drill through some of the specific aspects of the third
I’m a big baseball fan, and many years ago had the chance to try quarter and the actions we’re taking, as well as our outlook for the
out for the other New York team -- the Mets. I didn’t win a spot on fourth quarter.
that team – but I did win a lifelong zest for the thrill of
competition! Lower than expected results at DENA will cause full-year EPS to
fall below our previous guidance and your current expectations.
I’m retiring this week from another wonderful game, and it’s with Today we project full-year EPS to be in the range of $1.20 to $1.25
mixed feelings that I host my last earnings conference call with per share, excluding special items and the cumulative effect of
you. I have taken great pride in reporting on the progress of Duke accounting changes.
Energy – even during the challenging times we’ve faced. I’ve
done my best to address your tough questions with the degree of As you know, we have focused relentlessly on shoring up our
candor and detail that all of our investors deserve. This group isn’t balance sheet:
•
known for throwing softballs, but I’ve enjoyed the calls, one-on- For the year, we’ve generated gross proceeds of $1.9
ones and conferences! billion from the sale of non-strategic assets.
• We have reduced nearly $1.7 billion of net debt and
Duke Energy is a great company that has been greatly challenged trust preferred securities for the first nine months, and
of late. I’m looking forward to watching its comeback season – not by year-end we expect to meet our target of $1.8 billion
from the pitcher’s mound, but as a devoted fan and owner cheering in debt reduction at Duke Energy.
from the bleachers. • We have significantly reduced our capital spending to
$2.8 billion -- $400 million lower than our original
I know this is the quarter you’ve been waiting to hear about – so forecast of $3.2 billion.
let’s get right to it: • Our liquidity position is strong, with $1.8 billion in
cash and cash equivalents on hand at September 30th.
You were expecting to see a great third quarter from us – and we
were expecting to deliver one. We didn’t get to where we had We are dramatically reducing our cost structure in response to the
hoped to be, as you’ve seen from the financials we released this industry downturn. This quarter we’re implementing labor
morning. Energy markets are a tough place to play right now. But reductions and other expense reductions that will yield more than
throughout the third quarter, Duke Energy has worked hard to $200 million in annual pre-tax savings, beginning in 2004. We’re
strengthen our business and resize it to market realities. We’ve reducing our workforce further, by about 8 percent. The majority
made good headway – and we have more work to do. of those reductions will be complete by year-end, and you’ll note
that we took severance charges totaling $105 million, or 8 cents a
For the third quarter, we reported GAAP earnings of 5 cents per share, for the third quarter.
share, or $49 million, in net income. Ongoing earnings per share
for the quarter were 35 cents, excluding special items. I want to point out that our rigorous cost management efforts
began well before this latest round of cuts. We have steadily been
Duke Energy Gas Transmission, Duke Power, Field Services and pursuing savings and efficiencies across every line of our
Duke Energy International generally performed well, even in the organization, and since fourth quarter 2002, we have implemented
face of challenging market dynamics, a weak economy and less approximately $400 million in total annualized cost reductions. We
than desirable weather conditions. Robert will run through the have significantly scaled back our total workforce, and when fully
numbers with you shortly. implemented, we expect employee reductions to total
approximately 3,400. These reductions include 1,500 personnel
2
3. PREPARED REMARKS AND Q&A
Q3 2003 Duke Energy Earnings Conference Call October 30, 2003
associated with our workforce reduction in 2002 and an additional Duke Energy reported earnings of 5 cents per share for the third
1,900 employees related to the cost reduction plan announced quarter of 2003, which included 30 cents in special items which we
today. will cover in more detail in just a minute. Earnings for the third
quarter of 2002 were 27 cents per share and included charges for
We have taken disciplined action to reposition Duke Energy going special items totaling 24 cents per share.
forward. The work hasn’t been fun or easy. But the best medicine
isn’t supposed to taste good – it’s supposed to make you feel On the positive side. Most of our business segments delivered
better. I do believe we’re on the road to recovery, but market solid results for the quarter and the year to date. These businesses
signals tell us it won’t be a short road. As a company, we believe include both of our regulated operations – Franchised Electric and
deeply in the value of our product and our obligation to serve Natural Gas Transmission – and two of our unregulated businesses
employees, customers and shareholders. We’ll adhere to the – Field Services and International Energy.
regimen of bitter medicine and tough decisions as long as it takes
to restore the health of our company. On the downside. Weather had a negative impact on power sales
in our Franchised Electric business as well as DENA. Weather in
I know that my successor, Paul Anderson, is committed to that the Carolinas, as measured in cooling degree days, was 16% below
same course, and he’ll do a great job in leading Duke Energy normal this quarter and 21% below actual cooling degree days for
forward. Now I know you’re eager to hear about our plans for the third quarter last year. And mild summer weather across most
2004. Paul will be reviewing plans for 2004 over the next few of the U.S. reduced demand for power from our merchant
months and I suspect he’ll be in a position to share his thoughts generation fleet.
with you in early 2004.
DENA continues to suffer from the over-supply of merchant
I am optimistic about next year. We do expect to see generation and low spark spreads which have precluded many of
improvements generated from the cost reduction initiative I just our facilities from generating cost-effective power. For the most
mentioned, and from the continued reduction of debt on our part, our Western facilities have been running as planned this
balance sheet. We will continue to work tirelessly to wring all of summer while our facilities in the East have not run as much as
the costs we can out of our operations. Of course given that Paul expected. Our facilities in NEPOOL are called to dispatch more
takes the helm on November 1st, to say more about 2004 at this often than the other regions in the East.
time would be inappropriate. So we won’t be giving you any
specifics today regarding 2004. During the quarter, DENA took a $254 million charge for goodwill
impairment primarily related to the reduced scope and scale of
I began with a baseball analogy, so I’ll close that way as well: I am Duke Energy Trading & Marketing’s business and the continued
immensely proud to have worn the Duke Energy jersey for nearly deterioration of market conditions affecting DENA’s operations.
28 years, and to be a part of the best team in the energy league.
As a part of our cost reduction efforts across the company, Duke
In a few moments we will address your questions, but I’ll thank Energy incurred approximately $105 million in severance costs
you in advance for your interest in Duke Energy – and for making during the quarter. And you can expect additional severance costs
my life interesting, quarter after quarter! in the fourth quarter which could be about $30 million. Annual
cost savings related to the workforce reduction will be at least
With that, let me turn things over to Robert… $150 million. I’ll go into more detail later on all of our expected
cost savings.
Duke Energy reported higher interest expense in the quarter
Robert Brace - Duke Energy Corporation – Executive VP &
CFO primarily as a result of the reclassification of the trust preferred
securities of $24 million from minority interest to interest expense,
3
4. PREPARED REMARKS AND Q&A
Q3 2003 Duke Energy Earnings Conference Call October 30, 2003
lower capitalized interest of $33 million as compared with last
year’s third quarter and a $16 million write-off of capitalized debt Severance costs for DENA, DEI and corporate-level employees
costs resulting from a settlement with the South Carolina utility totaled $41 million, or 4 cents per share.
commission.
Duke Capital Partners wrote down assets held for sale by $23
Lower income taxes resulted from a $52 million tax benefit which million, or 2 cents per share.
was previously unavailable to the company. This benefit is
associated with the goodwill impairment taken in the fourth quarter And lastly, the previously mentioned tax benefit associated with
of 2002 related to our European trading business. last December’s goodwill write-off at DEI contributed $52 million,
or 6 cents per share.
Taking into consideration the lackluster earnings from DENA’s
ongoing operations, we expect 2003 annual earnings per share for For the third quarter 2003, Duke Energy reported consolidated
Duke Energy will fall short of our original guidance. As Rick earnings before interest and taxes of $352 million.
mentioned, we now anticipate earnings per share to be in the range
of $1.20 to $1.25 per share, before special items and cumulative During the third quarter, Franchised Electric increased its North
effect of accounting changes. Carolina Clean Air amortization expense by $35 million for a total
of $53 million. We may also increase the amortization for the
Now let me turn to the special items that occurred during the fourth quarter by a similar amount. Assuming we take this
quarter. additional amortization expense, Franchised Electric’s EBIT for
the year will likely be between $1.5 billion and $1.6 billion.
We recorded a number of special items in the quarter which totaled
30 cents per share. Natural Gas Transmission continues to deliver solid results and
expects to meet its annual EBIT target of $1.2 billion despite
Results for Franchised Electric were negatively affected by a foregone earnings associated with certain asset divestitures which
settlement with the South Carolina Public Service Commission for occurred during the year.
$30 million, or 2 cents per share. An additional $16 million or 1
cent per share, non-cash charge to interest expense was also Of our unregulated businesses, both Field Services and
included in the settlement. Franchised Electric also recorded a International Energy continued to deliver solid results in the third
severance charge of $46 million, or 3 cents per share, during the quarter.
quarter.
Field Services realized strong margins from its processing
Gains on asset sales benefited results at Natural Gas Transmission business, especially on percent-of-proceeds contracts which
by $30 million, or 2 cents per share, and were partially offset by increased nearly $50 million over last year’s third quarter. And
severance charges totaling $18 million, or 1 cent per share. Field Services continued to control operating costs during the
quarter which were about $20 million lower than last year.
The settlement with the CFTC lowered DENA’s segment EBIT by
$17 million, or 2 cents per share. This amount is net of minority Natural gas liquids prices continued to improve over the last year
interest and is not deductible for income tax purposes. from 39 cents in the third quarter of 2002 to 49 cents in the third
quarter this year. NGLs so far in the fourth quarter have averaged
Net losses on asset sales at DENA reduced EBIT by $81 million in about 53 cents per gallon and we continue to see improvements in
EBIT, or 5 cents per share. the frac spread as well. The average frac spread was 82 cents per
MMBtu in the third quarter and we’ve seen strengthening of the
And as I previously mentioned, the non-cash goodwill impairment average frac spread in the region of $1.50 in October.
at DENA totaled $254 million, or 18 cents per share.
4
5. PREPARED REMARKS AND Q&A
Q3 2003 Duke Energy Earnings Conference Call October 30, 2003
Also during the quarter, Field Services made an $87 million cash reduction of long-term debt with a reduction in cash. We have also
payment to Duke Energy related to the settlement of an reduced commercial paper by approximately $130 million since
intercompany obligation. This payment demonstrates the strong the end of September. Additional debt reductions in the fourth
cash flow position at Field Services. quarter will include approximately $300 million in maturities due
primarily at Duke Capital and Westcoast Energy.
Field Services continues to post successes in adding minimum fee
clauses to its keep-whole contracts in response to weak frac spread In order to fully reconcile to our net debt position on the balance
pricing environments. sheet as of the end of the third quarter, we must include changes to
our foreign debt balances that result from foreign currency
International Energy’s ongoing operations produced favorable fluctuations. Over the last nine months, foreign currencies –
results for the quarter. Positive results from the Latin American primarily the Canadian dollar – improved against the US dollar and
and European operations offset foregone earnings associated with as such the debt balances were adjusted to reflect the currency
the sale of PJP earlier in the year and a $3 million severance translation to US dollars. These translation adjustments added
charge during the quarter. Third quarter 2003 results also included about $775 million to our debt compared to year end 2002.
a $7 million charge for environmental reserves related to prior However, the local currency obligations remain unchanged and our
periods. Last year’s quarterly results included $91 million in Canadian operations generate sufficient cash flow to pay the
charges for impairments and write-downs. Canadian debt as it matures.
Field Services and International Energy remain on track to reach At Duke Capital, net debt has been reduced by $3 billion excluding
their segment EBIT goal for the year of $200 million and $250 the impact of currency changes.
million, respectively.
On the subject of capex, we’ve tightened the belt another notch and
Unfortunately, segment EBIT results from DENA’s merchant now expect our annual capital expenditures to be about $2.8
generation portfolio substantially offset the good results from our billion. This is a $400 million reduction from our original forecast
other businesses. We’ll cover the results at DENA in more detail of $3.2 billion. Most of the business units trimmed their capex
shortly. plans to reach this goal.
The company continues to make solid progress on its goals related And for the first nine months of 2003 we have announced or closed
to asset sales, debt reduction and controlling costs. asset sales in excess of $1.9 billion in gross proceeds.
Through the first nine months of 2003, we reduced our overall net We continue to find attractive opportunities to divest of certain
debt and trust preferred position by almost $1.7 billion at Duke non-core, non-strategic assets. With the announcement of the sale
Energy. This figure includes a year-to-date increase in cash of of Pacific Northern Gas in British Columbia we have announced a
$894 million. total of $1.9 billion in asset sales and closed on more than $1.6
billion through the third quarter. As of today, we’ve closed on
Year-to-date reductions in long-term debt, trust preferred securities $1.8 billion of asset sales – this is three times our original target for
and the net pay down of short-term debt reduced debt by $3.3 2003.
billion. Total long-term debt issued over the last nine months
totaled $2.8 billion. Debt associated with the sales of Empire We may have additional sales in the fourth quarter but I would
Pipeline and PJP also contributed to the reduction in debt for $317 expect these to be relatively small transactions. For example, you
million. may be aware that we have been looking at exiting our European
gas trading business. I would expect we’d be able to make some
I’d also like to point out that at the end of last week we completed announcement on this transaction shortly.
the redemption of $500 million in bonds which resulted in the
5
6. PREPARED REMARKS AND Q&A
Q3 2003 Duke Energy Earnings Conference Call October 30, 2003
The after-tax proceeds associated with these sales are Total operating expenses for 2003 are now expected to be about
approximately $1.65 billion. $732 million and clearly demonstrate the continued focus on
reducing costs across the DENA organization.
For 2003, the impact of foregone EBIT is expected to be in the
neighborhood of $150 million. The annualized impact on EBIT Obviously given these third quarter results, $200 million in EBIT,
will be approximately $235 million. before special items, is well out of reach for DENA this year. We
now expect annual ongoing results to be a loss of $70 million,
Next I’d like to briefly review Duke Energy’s liquidity position. excluding special items.
Now I’d like to turn the call over to Rob Ladd who will review
We reduced our total credit capacity from $4.7 billion at the end of DENA’s results for the third quarter and his expectations for the
the second quarter to $3.5 billion at the end of the third quarter. fourth quarter.
Due to the lower utilization of our commercial paper programs, we
reduced our credit facilities at both Duke Energy and Duke Capital Rob Ladd - Duke Energy Corporation - President, Duke
– more specifically, we are maintaining the multi-year credit Energy North America
facilities and let both of the 364-day facilities at Duke Energy and
Thank you, Robert. Good morning to everyone.
Duke Capital expire in August.
I will walk you through the third quarter results for Duke Energy
And our outstanding balances against these facilities have gone
North America, which includes our 60% interest in Duke Energy
down slightly – approximately $200 million – to $1.4 billion at the
Trading & Marketing.
end of the quarter.
The reported EBIT for the third quarter was a loss of $411 million
At September 30, we had unused capacity of $2.1 billion and cash
which includes the impact from the special items that Robert
and cash equivalents on hand totaling $1.8 billion.
covered earlier -- goodwill impairment of $254 million, net losses
on pending asset sales and assets held for sale of $81 million, the
As of October 27th, the outstanding commercial paper balance at
CFTC settlement of $17 million and $5 million of severance costs.
Duke Energy was $150 million and $178 million at Duke Capital.
EBIT before special items was a loss of $54 million. There were a
At Duke Energy North America, total gross margin realized in the
number of causes for this loss which are highlighted on the next
first nine months of 2003 amounted to $513 million. Low-risk
slide.
gross margin totaled approximately $448 million for the year to
date. “Other Sources” of gross margin did not produce favorable
This slide shows some of the more significant factors which caused
results during the quarter due to mild summer weather and low
our actual results to be lower than those we anticipated earlier in
power prices. For the year to date, Other Sources of gross margin
the year.
totaled $65 million.
First, we incurred a $50 million loss due to negative MTM
We expect to realize about $149 million in low-risk gross margin
movements and credit reserves associated with a few power tolls in
in the fourth quarter. This will bring us to the total $600 million
DETM. Approximately half of the loss was as a result of the
we originally expected for the year from our hedged generation
Northwestern Energy bankruptcy.
sales, ancillary services and must-run revenues.
Second, due to a mild summer in most of the country, we
Offsetting total gross margin were operating expenses totaling
experienced lower production and lower spark spreads. We
$508 million for depreciation, operating and maintenance, G&A
estimate that impacted gross margin by $40 to $60 million.
and minority interest expenses.
6
7. PREPARED REMARKS AND Q&A
Q3 2003 Duke Energy Earnings Conference Call October 30, 2003
Third, we have been reducing scale and scope of DETM and transactions do not require collateral and the gas supply cost is the
DENA which has impacted our gas transportation and storage responsibility of the customer. While this segment of our business
business. We estimate an additional $20 to $30 million impact on takes time to grow, we think the margin from such tolls will be an
profitability for the quarter. increasingly important part, and a very low risk element, of our
margin capture at DENA.
When you combine the impact of these three items, our EBIT for
the quarter was adversely affected by over $100 million. Now I’ll turn the call back to Robert.
Let me move to the plant production levels and spark spreads. Robert Brace - Duke Energy Corporation – Executive VP &
CFO
In the quarter, our generation fleet produced 9.1 million MW hours
In an effort to match operating and administrative costs to the
versus an original estimate of 10.9 million MW hours, or a 1.8
realities of the challenging market conditions, Duke Energy has
million MW hour shortfall.
embarked upon a substantial cost reduction plan to reduce costs for
both labor and operations.
The average spark spread, including the benefit of hedges, was
approximately $18.46 per MW hour versus an original estimate of
On the labor side, with the cost cutting plan we announced today
approximately $20.82 or a $2.36 shortfall. For the balance of 2003
we expect to further reduce our total corporate headcount by 8% or
we expect continued challenged market conditions.
approximately 1,900 employees. These employee reductions are
being taken across all business lines and also at the corporate
For the fourth quarter, we are estimating an ongoing EBIT loss of
levels. We expect these reductions to be substantially completed
$75 million which will bring the full year EBIT loss to
by the end of the year.
approximately $70 million before special items.
Annual pre-tax savings related to labor costs are expected to
Given this negative outlook, we have taken additional steps to
greater than $150 million.
aggressively take more costs out of the business. These are beyond
those already achieved so far this year.
During the third quarter, Duke Energy made a cash contribution to
the pension plan of $181 million.
Also, effective November 1st, we are merging our Energy
Marketing and Energy Management businesses together and
We are also reducing costs related to procurement and supply
forming integrated customer focused regional teams. We believe
chain management, mostly through renegotiation of contract terms.
that the merger of our marketing and trading personnel, together
And we are reducing our reliance on IT contractors and lowering
with a continued focus on the customer, will improve profitability
our infrastructure costs.
and reduce our long-term earnings volatility.
Annual pre-tax savings related to pension expense, procurement
Given the mild weather and lower sparks in the 3rd quarter, you
and IT are expected to be at least $50 million.
won’t be surprised to hear that we have not improved our low risk
gross margin for 2004. Low risk gross margin for 2004 is in the
In summary, the third quarter did not provide the earnings we
low $300 million range. However, you should be aware of our
anticipated primarily due to mild summer weather and low spark
progress in signing longer term power toll deals. As we have
spreads. Due to the loss in earnings at Duke Energy North
indicated previously, securing such tolling deals has become an
America, our expectations for earnings for the full year 2003 will
increasing focus for our DENA marketing team over the past 12-18
now be in the range of $1.20 to $1.25 per share, excluding special
months. In that period we have secured more than $400 million of
items and the cumulative effect of a change in accounting
gross margin associated with such customer transactions. This
principles.
gross margin will be realized over the next 8-10 years. These
7
8. PREPARED REMARKS AND Q&A
Q3 2003 Duke Energy Earnings Conference Call October 30, 2003
QUESTION AND ANSWER
While we will fall short of our earnings expectations, we have
successfully met and exceeded our goals on asset sales and capital
expenditures for 2003. We are also on pace to reduce total debt
and trust preferred securities by $1.8 billion by the end of the year. Operator
Thank you very much, gentlemen. Our question and answer
And today, we announced a cost reduction plan that will result in
session will be conducted electronically. If you would like to ask a
at least $200 million in annual pre-tax savings for the company.
question, press the star key followed by the digit quot;1quot; on your
touch-tone telephone. If you are joining us on a speakerphone,
please be sure to use your mute function so your signal may reach
We remain committed to the long-term financial strength and
our equipment. Once again that is star, quot;1quot; to ask a question. We
future success of Duke Energy. We’ve taken difficult steps to
will pause to assemble our roster.
address the challenges across our businesses with the anticipation
of improving market conditions and a return to solid earnings And our first question will come from Ashar Khan with Foresight
Investment.
growth in the future.
Ashar Khan - Foresight Investment - Analyst
Over the next couple of months we will be reviewing our 2004
plans with Paul Anderson and we look forward to speaking to you
Good morning gentlemen. Robert, if I can just do some
about those plans early in the New Year.
comparisons of what I heard, just want some confirmation of data.
You mentioned that reductions to work force and O&M savings
Well, let me thank you for your time, interest and investment in would be a positive $200 million on a pre-tax basis in 2004 versus
2003.
Duke Energy.
And then that the loss of EBIT in relationship to the businesses that
I will wrap up by reiterating that while the quarter, from an have been sold to date on an analyzed basis would mean a further
earnings perspective, did not come in as we had expected we are loss of EBIT of $235 million, if I heard it, but on an incremental
basis, it's only $85 million 2004 versus 2003?
very pleased and bolstered by the progress we have made on net
debt reduction - reaching some $1.7B at Duke Energy and in
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation –CEO & Chairman
excess of that at Duke Capital.
That's correct.
We are extremely pleased by our progress on the asset divestiture
plan where we have now exceeded our target by more than 3 times.
Ashar Khan - Foresight Investment - Analyst
And of course, the cost reduction initiative that we discussed with OK. And now in relationship to funding your pensions this
you today which will provide some $200 million in pre-tax quarter, you had, if I remember from our June meeting or end of
May meeting, you had some pension contributions in '04 and '05,
benefits to the company in 2004.
so those pension contributions are no longer required.
With that, we look forward to following up with you to answer any
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation – CEO & Chairman
questions you may have over the coming days, and I and the rest of
the investor relations team are available to take your calls.
That is correct.
Ashar Khan - Foresight Investment - Analyst
And as you are lowering your Capex budgets for this year, would
that imply similar reductions in Capex budgets going forward?
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation – CEO & Chairman
8
9. PREPARED REMARKS AND Q&A
Q3 2003 Duke Energy Earnings Conference Call October 30, 2003
Dan Eggers - Credit Suisse First Boston - Analyst
We have given previous guidance on the '04 anticipated capital,
and there have been considerable cuts, frankly and cost reductions
Good morning.
that will affect that and reduce that for '04.
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation –CEO & Chairman
Ashar Khan - Foresight Investment - Analyst
Good morning, Dan.
And then, if I can just -- if I do my numbers in terms of going to
DENA, to be able to meet the projections for the $75 million EBIT
Dan Eggers - Credit Suisse First Boston - Analyst
loss now projected for the year, if I'm right, you still have to earn
gross margin in the range of about $150 million or so, for the
fourth quarter. Rob, I hate to come back at you so quickly, but looking at your
hedge position for the fourth quarter, you guys are over-
And I was just trying to get some -- a little bit more feedback as to committed, is that correct, at 142% in hedged positions?
what makes you, in reference to the results announced in the third
quarter, what makes you comfortable in achieving that margin?
Robert Ladd - Duke Energy North America, President
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation –CEO & Chairman Yes, as September 30th, that would be accurate. As you know,
these vary by quarter over the year. We're currently substantially
Rob will address that. less than that, as we go into the quarter and we're now almost at
November 1st.
Rob Ladd - Duke Energy Corporation - President, Duke
Energy North America Dan Eggers - Credit Suisse First Boston - Analyst
Yes. That number is really just our low-risk margin that we have So you're even or below even and you're not in a long electricity
budgeted for the balance of the year. position at this point?
Ashar Khan - Foresight Investment - Analyst Robert Ladd - Duke Energy North America, President
Yes, but I think you achieved that low-risk margin this time also, I'm not saying that. We're lower than the 142%.
but you had market-to-market low gross margin losses of $60
million in the third quarter, which killed some of that off, so are
Dan Eggers - Credit Suisse First Boston - Analyst
you expecting no market-to-market losses in the fourth quarter?
OK. You guys tagged on incremental hedges for '04, '05 both on a
Rob Ladd - Duke Energy Corporation - President, Duke hedge position and then you brought up the price a little bit in '05.
Energy North America
Can you give us some color on what kinds of spreads you guys are
locking in? Are these transactions cash flow positive at this point
Yes, at this point in time, we're not expecting any, but obviously, in time? And would they flow down to EBIT positive, for to you
if we had a movement that would affect it, but none anticipated at think through what your commitments are?
this point.
Robert Ladd - Duke Energy North America - President
Ashar Khan - Foresight Investment - Analyst
Yes, all of the sparks that we locked in have been positive,
OK, thank you very much. certainly relative to capital. It's part of what I mentioned earlier
about some of these longer-term tolls. We're able to capture more
than just what the market would indicate.
Operator
Dan Eggers - Credit Suisse First Boston - Analyst
Our next question will come from Dan Eggers with Credit Suisse
First Boston.
9
10. PREPARED REMARKS AND Q&A
Q3 2003 Duke Energy Earnings Conference Call October 30, 2003
OK, very well. And if we can just shift over, right enough to run Dan Eggers - Credit Suisse First Boston - Analyst
us through what you're seeing internationally. You know you guys
picked up some better contracts in Brazil earlier, and there's
Great, thank you guys. One more, and I will let you go. What was
certainly been a lot of talk about Australia, but if you could give us
the FX impact this quarter?
a rundown of the just operation of what you're seeing kind of on
the market or region basis.
Robert Brace – Duke Energy Corporation – Executive VP &
CFO
Fred Fowler - Duke Energy Corporation - President & COO
The FX impact this quarter wasn't terribly significant, a few tens
of millions.
Yes. I will do that. As you know, we have pretty significantly
reduced our trading operations in Europe so we have that situation
stabilized and doing fine. We are continuing to look at what our Dan Eggers - Credit Suisse First Boston - Analyst
options are on that business. If you look at Australia, you really
have most of the businesses there doing OK. OK, thank you.
The one that's really hurting us is the Tasmanian pipe line, and we
Operator
continue to have very low through-put on that system, but the
balance of those businesses are doing fine. They're primarily fairly
Moving on to Kit Konolige with Morgan Stanley.
contracted businesses. In Brazil, we've had a good year in Brazil.
Although, there is currently a lot of uncertainty with the new
government that's come in. Kit Konolige - Morgan Stanley - Analyst
The fact that the Energy Minister is looking at kind of a new
Thanks. Good morning. Rick, what can I say? I commemorate
regime for the big utility industry there. I think it's too early to
your last conference call.
know where that's going to end up. We're very actively involved in
that process. Probably the biggest vulnerability we have in Brazil,
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
is that the market continues to be fairly long at this point for two
reasons.
That's kind of you. Does that mean you're going to throw softball?
Number one, because of the rationing they went through. People
have kind of stayed on that plan even though the rationing has
Kit Konolige - Morgan Stanley - Analyst
ended. The second thing is they've had a lot of wet weather, so the
reservoirs are pretty full, so you have a lot of hydropower
Well, you know, you talked about how much you appreciated the
capability.
hard questions.
The other thing that was done, there was a regime that was set up
that really disadvantaged the contracting process this year – the Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
independent power producers, and were heavily in favor of the
state. There's been a big uproar over that. We're obviously working
I never expect a softball. Fire away.
on that. It looks like one of those things that will go down to the
wire.
Kit Konolige - Morgan Stanley - Analyst
In the meantime, we have another 25% of our capacity that rolls
off from the original contracts this year. I think as you recall, 25% I don't want to hurt your feelings that way.
rolls off a year between 2003 and 2006. No doubt that we're at a
disadvantage to the state-owned utilities on renewing contracts. So
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
we've had a very aggressive marketing program out to new
customers, industrials primarily.
Thank you.
Again, I think when it's all said and done, I think we will get that
25% re-contracted, and I do think it will be at prices at or near the Kit Konolige - Morgan Stanley - Analyst
roll off prices. The balance of South America is fairly stable at this
point and doing OK.
Just a couple of somewhat related questions, trying to think
through a little bit. Impacts of things you're doing now into 2004,
10
11. PREPARED REMARKS AND Q&A
Q3 2003 Duke Energy Earnings Conference Call October 30, 2003
so as I understand what you have described so far EBIT for DENA When you're talking about cost cuttings and labor and other
for this year is going to be something in the $600 million range? totaling $200 million, lower costs in 2004 versus 2003, then you
would be saying in addition to that, you have lower debt and you
have a positive variance on pensions.
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
For this year? No.
Yes, that's correct.
Kit Konolige - Morgan Stanley - Analyst
Kit Konolige - Morgan Stanley - Analyst
I'm sorry, gross margin.
OK. Also, I noticed that the --can you describe a little bit your
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
thinking on the acceleration of amortizing the clean air obligation
in North Carolina?
That's correct.
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
Kit Konolige - Morgan Stanley - Analyst
Yes, clearly, in this particular case, we had very cool weather in
Gross Margin and then you say low $300 million range of low- the last quarter of 2002, and then the first quarter of 2003, which is
risk gross margin for 2004. in our rolling 12-months regulated return, we had exceptionally
good bulk power marketing revenues that came through as a result
of the high gas prices, keeping elevated prices in the east and our
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
selling coal fired and nuclear fired excess generation into that
market.
That's correct.
For those two quarters, we experienced considerable inflows and
Kit Konolige - Morgan Stanley - Analyst as a consequence, it gave us a chance to sort of accelerate, if you
will, the payment for the clean air expenditures that we're going to
Now, of the costs, can you walk through a little bit the cost cuts have in the state of North Carolina, so we took that opportunity to
that you have described so far. And in particular, I'm interested in really expense some of it out.
what is the bottom line impact of the cost cuts going to be in 2004
compared to what we're already seeing in 2003.
Kit Konolige - Morgan Stanley - Analyst
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman Final question would be on operating cash flow for the year. I
think you have talked about $4 billion as the target. It looks like
Yes, you're going to see the 2003 flow through to 2004. In the about $2.9 billion through three quarters.
case of 2004, the incremental cost cuts are about $200 million, a
little bit in excess of $200 million. About $150 million of that will
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
come through reductions in labor expenses and about $50 million
or so will come through in the category of reduced expenses in a
We are right now, leafing through the papers, to get that number.
variety of different areas.
Hold one second. I'm looking at the treasurer and he's looking at
the controller and they're both saying do you have that number.
As you know, we're reducing debt, as well, and we will see some
of it flow through in that category. We made some advance
pension funding decisions that would help to flow through, as well, Robert Brace - Duke Energy Corporation – Executive VP &
so that's the categorization of them. The objective would be to CFO
have the full amount, or something in excess of that full amount,
flowing through really beginning of January 1. You're right, on the nine-month cash flows, you're right, $2.9
billion dollars. I don't have the full year forecast for the cash from
operations line on the like for like basis, what we are able to
Kit Konolige - Morgan Stanley - Analyst
confirm is that the pay-down debt that we told you before will
happen at $1.8 billion and even more at Duke Capital.
11
12. PREPARED REMARKS AND Q&A
Q3 2003 Duke Energy Earnings Conference Call October 30, 2003
outcome, and I'm not so certain we will see those kinds of
extraordinary quarters occurring one after another.
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
And yes, some of the cost is coming out of the electric company.
We just don't have that number with us. The $2.9 billion is There's no question about that.
correct. As to we are into the fourth quarter, we simply do not
have the numbers. We sit here despite the 32 feet of paper that we
Paul Patterson - Glen Rock Associates - Analyst
have available to us.
So even with the ice storm, you expect to be earning under you're
Kit Konolige - Morgan Stanley - Analyst
allowed ROE, I mean backing up the ice storm and everything that
you guys had. I mean once I pick out of the ice storm. What I'm
That's fine. We can circle back. I will leave you there. I hope those saying is that going forward, with these cost cuts and everything,
weren't two softball questions. we shouldn't expect you guys to earn --you're ROEs at the utilities
should fall to around the allowed ROE?
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
Thanks Kit, I enjoyed working with you.
Well, I think our plan --we said $1.5 to $1.6 billion or so. We
don't fix a pattern with a ROE that fits within the regulatory frame
Operator
work. So I think the answer to your question is you know, we think
that's fine at this point in time. To the extent that something
Before the next question, to let everyone know, if you find your
wonderful happens, we'll simply deal with that as that occurs.
question has been answered, you may remove your self from the
queue by pressing the pound key. We'll now hear from Paul
Patterson with Glen Rock Associates. Paul Patterson - Glen Rock Associates - Analyst
OK and then second question I have for you, Rick, is in terms of
Paul Patterson - Glen Rock Associates - Analyst
the cost cutting and everything, clearly, you guys saw some
problems and what have you, and I don't know how else to ask
Hello, can you hear me?
this, but why did you guys come to the conclusion in the third
quarter that you know, you had to make this extra push. What was
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman the sort of thinking there? I mean in other words, why didn't you
do it earlier if it was that easily achievable what have you -- you
Hello Paul yes I can hear you clearly. might have.
Paul Patterson - Glen Rock Associates - Analyst Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
I wanted to ask you about the $200 million in cost savings and Well Paul, we made major moves in fourth quarter of '02 and the
where that might show up. Specifically with what it's going be in early first quarter of '03, which was two quarters ago. That
the franchise electric and considering your earned ROEs amounted to nearly $200 million in substantial reductions. We
surveillance reports that have been coming out of both have executed those. Those cost savings are flowing through.
jurisdictions, North and South Carolina, and you're allowed ROEs,
you know, where you stand there, are you guys thinking of getting As you know, we didn't know for sure where we were with regard
a regulatory deal of some sort, in which these ROE surveillances to DENA when we hit the third quarter, you know that DENA did
won't be as important? not nor did any other merchant plants were not able to deliver a
decent third quarter when we began to sense that, that third quarter
was a question mark, we simply decided to take the next step and
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
drive out additional costs, resize down the business further from
where we originally anticipated, so simply make sure that when we
No, let me just say it again, as I described to Kit earlier, the
get to the bottom of the cycle here, we can get down to a place
regulatory surveillance issue comes because of a terrific fourth
where we can remain healthy and just ride out the bottom of the
quarter in '02 and then likewise followed by a big first quarter of
cycle, however long it may be, and so that's the thinking that went
'03, and to the extent that those quarters keep repeating themselves,
into it.
well, that would be wonderful, and we just have to deal with that
12
13. PREPARED REMARKS AND Q&A
Q3 2003 Duke Energy Earnings Conference Call October 30, 2003
Fred Fowler - Duke Energy Corporation - President & COO Paul Patterson - Glen Rock Associates - Analyst
This is Fred, and that's been one of my major efforts this year, so I In your future endeavors.
would like to make a comment. You know, one of the things that
you have to do in this process is you have to figure out how do I
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
get the work done? You know, you do one of two things. How do I
do it in a way that I get the same amount of work done with less
I have enjoyed working with you.
head count?
And secondly, what are the things that I no longer really have to Paul Patterson - Glen Rock Associates - Analyst
do? So it's not a process of simply that you can just go in and cut
heads. You got to have to think of how am I going to reconfigure Thank you
the workload, as well, so it typically happens more in stages than
just saying, hey, all at once, I can come in and cut or reduce work
Operator
force by 4,000 people.
And we will now hear from James Pringle with Giovine Capital
Paul Patterson - Glen Rock Associates - Analyst
Group.
So in other words, I guess it was an interim process where you
James Pringle – Giovine Capital Group - Analyst
guys kept on finding additional cost cutting that you can do
without substantially harming the business? Is that the right way to
understand it? Can you let us know what your dividend plan is for next year, and
if you know it can be a little bit more specific than the board's
going to review it?
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
I think you're right on the mark, and we have a history of doing Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
this. That's how we got from running an electric company with
25,000 people down to 10,000 people. James, what kind of -this is a terrible position to put me in. I have
got a successor coming along by the name of Paul Anderson. You
know how I feel about the dividend. Paul has spoken publicly
Paul Patterson - Glen Rock Associates - Analyst
about how he feels about the dividend. He has to review the plans
that we have currently in hand. We have a series of alternative
OK Then finally, gas risk, gas risk exposure for that 98% expected
plans. He is going to pick, I presume, as any good CEO would, the
hedge production for '04 and the estimated production for the total
plan that makes the most sense for the company going forward. It's
year of '03, if you can give that to me.
going to take him a couple of months to be able to do that. Until he
can do that and then sit down with the Board and make the final
Rob Ladd - Duke Energy Corporation - President, Duke choice on the business plan, we just aren't in a position to say
Energy North America anything about the dividend, James.
Yes this is Rob, Paul. We're substantially hedged in '04 and the
James Pringle – Giovine Capital Group - Analyst
same would apply to the balance of '03.
But just as you stated earlier, he has not been as vocal about
Paul Patterson - Glen Rock Associates - Analyst
supporting the current level dividend is that what you're inferring?
OK. Excellent. Listen, thank you very much, and good luck to
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
you, Rick.
I'm not inferring that at all. The information that I heard from Paul
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation –CEO & Chairman
reported by the news agencies went something like this. In fact, I
have a quote here. The quote is, “Dividends are important, and you
Thanks, Paul. should do everything you can to avoid cutting dividends.
Philosophically, I'm a supporter of dividends.” He went on to say,
13
14. PREPARED REMARKS AND Q&A
Q3 2003 Duke Energy Earnings Conference Call October 30, 2003
“When I took the job at BHP, everyone said the first thing I would Maureen Howe - RBC Capital Markets - Analyst
do is cut the dividend. I never cut the dividend at BHP.” Now do
you think that's leaning towards cutting the dividend, I guess you're
But the one-time reduction brings you back down presumably and
free to think that opinion, but I would tend to lean the other way.
presume that's how they did the calculation, to your allowed
return?
James Pringle – Giovine Capital Group - Analyst
Ruth Shaw - Duke Energy Corporation - President, Duke
All right. Thank you very much. Power
Again, I think there's some misunderstanding that the quote,
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
unquote, “allowed return” represents a cap, which it does not. It
represents a target level. We've earned below that in a number of
Thanks, James.
quarters, and in fact, we earned below it in far more quarters than
we have earned above it. The decrement on that 12 month, actually
Operator 13-month rolling average will certainly keep us well within that
range for that period, and as Rick said earlier, we anticipate at the
And We'll now hear from Maureen Howe with RBC Capital earnings levels we expect to stay in the range of our allowed
Markets. returns.
Maureen Howe - RBC Capital Markets - Analyst Maureen Howe - RBC Capital Markets - Analyst
Good morning. I have a question about the normalizing OK, so I'm still challenged to see why it's, you know, a
adjustment associated with South Carolina. I can appreciate that it nonrecurring item.
may not all be attributable that the charge, the $30 million charge
to this quarter, but isn't it appropriate that that should be included
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
in recurring earnings for the year since it, in fact, was a rate
reduction?
It’s Rick, Can I take a shot? As I told you, that was a non--what
may well be a nonrecurring good news story in the fourth quarter
Ruth Shaw - Duke Energy Corporation - President, Duke of 2002 and what we would believe to be potentially a
Power nonrecurring good news story in the first quarter of 2003, and so
the commission elected to put on a decrement for 12 Months to
This is Ruth Shaw, and I'm president of Duke Power and that is wash out that blip, and there's no indication necessarily that we
specific in the order from South Carolina a “one-time rate will continue to have wonderful blips like that and there's no
decrement” which has been was fully taken in September. indication that even if we did, they would necessarily take the
same approach. So I don't think there's anything recurring about
that.
Maureen Howe - RBC Capital Markets - Analyst
Maureen Howe - RBC Capital Markets - Analyst
So, but your rates define an understanding in decrement, and
maybe I don't, were actually reduced?
OK, I guess one could take out the positive blip in the first quarter
to offset the negative blip that they gave you in the third, which,
Ruth Shaw - Duke Energy Corporation - President, Duke
expect is that how the commission looked at it?
Power
That is a one-time rate decrement for a twelve-month period at
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
which point rates return to the previously approved level.
I'm not really following you.
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
So The fundamental rates remain the same, there's a decrement that
Maureen Howe - RBC Capital Markets - Analyst
subtracts the net rate for 12-month period and then the original
rates are reinstated.
That's fine. Thank you very much.
14
15. PREPARED REMARKS AND Q&A
Q3 2003 Duke Energy Earnings Conference Call October 30, 2003
OK. I appreciate that, and everything else was answered, and just
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
to be a little more specific to an earlier question about your hedges
and your gas price risk, I believe, that Mr. Anderson had made a
Thank you.
public statement about you being short gas and being exposed to
rising prices, and I take it from your answer to an earlier question
Operator that you have sold that gas forward and locked in a spread and so
you're no longer at risk?
We'll now hear from Carol Coale, Prudential.
Rob Ladd - Duke Energy Corporation - President, Duke
Energy North America
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation –CEO & Chairman
Yes, Carol this is Rob Ladd, as I indicated, we're substantially
Hello Carol.
hedged relative to gas, and although, as you know from previous --
I believe previous discussions that we typically do not buy all of
Carol Coale - Prudential Securities - Analyst
the gas for the production that we expect. We do as we get closer
to that period of time, but we do not have all of the gas purchase
Hello. Good morning. for the forward periods.
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation –CEO & Chairman Carol Coale - Prudential Securities - Analyst
Good morning. OK. Thank you and good luck, Rick.
Carol Coale - Prudential Securities - Analyst Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
Most of my questions were answered, but I have one left. If you Thank you, Carol.
could please give us a little bit more clarification on the cash
payment that field services made to Duke Energy, the $87 million.
Operator
It was related to a settlement, and I wasn't really following if this
was or what this cash payment was.
Moving on to Ali Agha with Burnham Securities
David Hauser - Duke Energy Corporation - Senior VP &
Ali Agha – Burnham Securities - Analyst
Corporate Treasurer
Thank you, a couple of questions. First on DENA, could you
Carol, this is David. When we constructed the field services
remind us what is the total capital investment right now in DENA
partnership with Conoco Phillips, we set up a preferred stock
from Duke, and how much of that is goodwill?
essentially that is part of the capitalization of that entity, and this
was nearly a repayment of a piece of that preferred stock and our
share was the $87.5 million. Robert Brace - Duke Energy Corporation – Executive VP &
CFO
Carol Coale - Prudential Securities - Analyst
The total capital employed at DENA is approximately $8 billion,
and there's no goodwill.
So this was a one-time event. So shouldn't we treat that as a
nonrecurring item in field services, or did it not affect income?
Ali Agha – Burnham Securities - Analyst
David Hauser - Duke Energy Corporation - Senior VP &
Corporate Treasurer No goodwill.
Well, yes, that's cash. That is not income. Robert Brace - Duke Energy Corporation – Executive VP &
CFO
Carol Coale - Prudential Securities - Analyst
15
16. PREPARED REMARKS AND Q&A
Q3 2003 Duke Energy Earnings Conference Call October 30, 2003
No remaining goodwill.
Ali Agha – Burnham Securities - Analyst
Ali Agha – Burnham Securities - Analyst
OK, and last question, as it relates to the DENA in 2004 right
Second question, when you look at the 2004 numbers right now now, there has been anecdotal evidence that we're heading from
for DENA, looking at the math and the table that you put out there, other merchant producers that there is a high level of activity going
you are assuming basically that you produced just about as much on right now in terms of potentially looking forward to medium
as you have hedged right now. Does that imply that there are some and long-term contracts. You mentioned you haven't seen much at
facilities that are not running at all and there are costs associated all in the third quarter, could you comment on what you are seeing
with those? in the market out there vis-à-vis contractual opportunities?
Rob Ladd - Duke Energy Corporation - President, Duke Rob Ladd - Duke Energy Corporation - President, Duke
Energy North America Energy North America
This is Rob again. I think it would be fair to say that our peaking Sorry, I must have misspoken; I meant to indicate that we are
plants next year will run nominally at this point, if at all, so it seeing a number of opportunities in the tolling area out over time.
depends on those plans with combined cycles in certain parts of The number I mentioned before was about $400 million of gross
country expected to produce quite a bit, but others not depending margin over 8 to 10 year period. We have had the opportunity thus
on what region they're in and with the other cycles, it's nominal. far in 2003 to lock in about $65 million of gross margin, again over
a number of years period of time. We are seeing those
opportunities. They really vary by region. In the west, they can be
Ali Agha – Burnham Securities - Analyst
attractive given the spark spreads there, but in other parts of the
country, which are somewhat depressed, the opportunity isn't as
great, so frankly, we have been selective. We don't want to lock
Rob, just to get a sense, what kinds of O&M costs do you incur on
into low sparks at this period of time.
those speakers?
Ali Agha – Burnham Securities - Analyst
Rob Ladd - Duke Energy Corporation - President, Duke
Energy North America
Thanks.
Well, it's fairly modest, but it does involve, we do have property
tax and insurance whether they're operating or not, and then, of
Operator
course, we have the depreciation charge, as well.
We'll now hear from Jay Dobson with Deutsche Bank.
Ali Agha – Burnham Securities - Analyst
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
Right. So how much is that run annually?
Hello Jay.
Rob Ladd - Duke Energy Corporation - President, Duke
Energy North America
Jay Dobson - Deutsche Bank - Analyst
Run annually?
Hello, how are you, Rick?
Ali Agha – Burnham Securities - Analyst
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
Yes.
Good.
Rob Ladd - Duke Energy Corporation - President, Duke
Jay Dobson - Deutsche Bank - Analyst
Energy North America
Two questions, if I can. On the CAPEX cuts, can you detail where
I don't think I can give you the exact number, but I will follow up
the $400 million came from and just give us a sense if there's sort
with you.
16
17. PREPARED REMARKS AND Q&A
Q3 2003 Duke Energy Earnings Conference Call October 30, 2003
of any additional we can expect going forward. I know we're of the year with regard to anticipated capital and you know we
limping toward the tail end of 2003 here, so I guess it is sort of were asking for guidance just probably reasonably on tracks with
looking out toward 2004. the exception that we have made some with the short cut. So,
approximately it will be lower than.
And then second, I was wondering if Robert could detail for us, in
the $1.20 to $1.25 EPS, I assume that continues to include the asset
Jay Dobson - Deutsche Bank - Analyst
gains booked in the second quarter, so if we can sort of look at
maybe what '03 sort of recurring earnings will be under your
OK, great thank you.
forecast looking out into '04 or as a base for '04.
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
Thanks James
The $1.20, $1.25 has all gains and losses netted out of it. It's an
ongoing number.
Operator
Jay Dobson - Deutsche Bank - Analyst
And unfortunately that is all the time that we have today for
questions. I will turn the conference back to Mr. Ebel for any
Completely clean of everything booked earlier this year?
closing additional remarks.
Rick Priory - Duke Energy Corporation - CEO & Chairman
Greg Ebel - Duke Energy Corporation - VP, Investor and
Shareholder Relations
Stripped clean of anything earlier booked this year. Basically
when you look at the CAPEX coming up that last increment of
Well, let me thank you for your time, and interest in Duke Energy.
CAPEX was another couple of hundred million dollars. We see
little bit of it coming out of franchise electric but a good bit out of
I will wrap up by reiterating that while the quarter, from an
gas transmission a bit out of Crescent Resources and a good bit out
earnings perspective, did not come in as we had expected we are
of others as well.
very pleased and bolstered by the progress we have made on net
So, franchise electric primarily was driving the latest increment of debt reduction - reaching some $1.7B at Duke Energy and in
$200 million the earlier increment of $200 million. I just don't excess of that at Duke Capital.
have that information exactly what that distribution was.
We are extremely pleased by our progress on the asset divestiture
Jay Dobson – Deutsch Bank - Analyst plan where we have now exceeded our target by more than 3 times.
It was more across the board?
And, of course, the cost reduction initiative that we discussed with
you today which will provide some $200M in pre-tax benefits to
Fred Fowler – Duke Energy Corporation – President & COO
the company in 2004.
That also heavily weighted for franchise electric and gas
With that, we look forward to following up with you to answer any
transmission because that is a big gap in our correlation.
questions you may have over the coming days, and I and the rest of
the investor relations team are available to take your call.
Jay Dobson – Deutsch Bank – Analyst
Was that? Does it get it pre, Fred?
Operator
Fred Fowler – Duke Energy Corporation – President & COO That does conclude today's conference. On behalf of Duke Energy
and Premier Conference we will thank you for your participation.
Yes, exactly I have on the $400 million. Just wonder looking
forward and the ability to take that down even further. Well, we
know we have given some guidance back I think in the early part
17