THE CONSTRUCTION OF FACTUAL 
PROGRAMMES – ISSUES, CODES AND 
CONVENTIONS 
By Sophie White
INTRODUCTION 
In this power point I am hoping to ilistrate the codes and coventions of factual 
programming and how they can inform and determine the audiences responses. 
I will also compare the 5 modes of documentary and analyse the conventions of 
news programmes.
WHAT ARE THE CODES AND CONVENTIONS OF 
FACTUAL PROGRAMMING ? 
There are many basic codes and conventions in factual production and these represent the typical 
signs and events that we generally see in any type of factual production whether this be TV 
documentries or TV news. These are often things that we don’t realise are planned and we think 
they are just meant to be there. This may be the main presenter on the news or the fact that every 
documentary will have shown basic evidence such as statistics that are not really noticed whilst 
watching but are there to prove the factual base of the story. These coventions can also vary 
depending on the audience for example if you are watching a political documentary the creater may 
want you to be outraged so they may edit the informations so they can get this reponce to do this 
would be following a convention of political documenties as many think that they alter there 
information to make the situation controversial. This will be very different if they just want to inform 
the audience as they might just do ths by stating the correct facts and showing evidence. The 
audiences response can be controlled by the documentary and how they chose to structure it. 
These structures come in the shape of the 5 modes.
EXPOSITORY DOCUMENTARY 
The main purpose of an expository documentary is to create and fight for a particular subject 
possibly making a controversial argument. They will tend to feature many facts and statistics to use 
as evidence to make you believe just that little bit more. The main presenter/narrator will speak 
directly to the viewer trying to get them to engage and interact with the evidence they are presenting 
overall trying to pursuade you to their side. There main goal is to get you to change your thoughts 
on that particular subject. They will use a clear narrator that is not often seen this will make the 
voice appear authoritive this authority often makes us trust them. This narrator will most likely 
address the audience directly again this is trying to pull in the audience and wants to make you a 
part of there argument. These documentries have a lot of controvosy surronding them as they often 
are opionated and can provide false evidence and they often alter footage so that it suits their 
purposes. 
There are many examples of expository documentries such as Americas most wanted, Paranormal 
experiences and many more.
EXPOSITORY DOCUMENTRY : BENEFITS STREET 
Benefits street is a popular and controversial documentry that appeared on channel 4. It 
documents the life of the families on the famous benefits street which is the most highly 
populated area of benefit claimers. This documentry follows many of the key themes of 
expository documentry and follows many of its codes and coventions such as there being a 
narrator that never appears in front of the camera instead it becomes reliants on the family 
and short interviews where the family make there point. They also have created this 
documentry to make it opinionated as it grasps peoples attention and has a varied response 
after it was found that they altered most of there footage to suit there needs. Instead of using 
facts and figures as many expository documentries do they instead have let the footage of the 
street occupiers to speak for themselves . Overall the documentry was controversial and this 
is the main impact and purpose of an expository documentry. 
To see an example of benefits street see : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkKJQF1xSJU
OBSERVATIONAL DOCUMENTRY 
Observational documentry is basically just what it sounds like it is when the main creater will 
just observe the the subject with minimal interaction possible. This does mean that they are 
shot informally on the go sometimes with just a handheld camera they also will feature not 
interviews and possibly may have no voice over. They allow the events speak for 
themeselves. You may also hear these documentries being refered to as “fly on the wall “ 
documenties this is just what they want to reanact in the documentry itself. These 
documentries will have no given agenda this means they can show whats happeing without 
having the impact of being bias or trying to opininate an audience. This means there will be a 
lack of facts and figure although they still may feature them to edjucate the audinece. In 
modern times these documentries often come in the form of reality TV such as the popular 
shows like big brother or Made in Chelsea.
OBSERVATIONAL DOCUMENTRY : BIG BROTHER 
Big Brother Is a very modern take on observational documentry it follows a group of people as 
they competing in tasks while they are trapped in a house away from the civilisations outside. 
In the recent year it has become a staple on our TV’s. Big Brother has many of the features of 
an observational documentry for one it is all shot through cctv camera and has no interuption 
by the main maker of the documentry instead it allows the events to flow as they do. This can 
mainly be seen through the many times that filming is not always needed like while they are 
sleeping or even how they carry out there daily lives but we see it all anyway. I think that 
these are mostly watched because it allows the audience to be nossy and see how others live 
and how they can face problems such as the tasks set. 
To see a clip of big brother check : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoP34cfyfv8
PARTICIPATORY DOCUMENTARY 
Participatory is the direct opposite of observational, instead of stopping any interuption with 
the subject it instead tries to get as involved as possible whether this is trying to takepart in 
the subjects daily events or just interviewing them. The filmaker will record the interactions 
between them and the subject hopefully gaining more experience to portrait the the subject to 
the audience more realistically. This does mean that the film maker is heavily featured in the 
documentary this also allows you to see how it changes them. These documentaries are very 
intrusive on the subjects life and often mean that both them and the film maker have to 
diverege as much imformation as possible not only on there experience but also their lives. 
They are mostly filmed on handheld cameras that are not hard to carry or use on a day to day 
basis so that life can go on as normal as possible. These are a popular choice of documentary 
when people are trying to learn new cultures such as the documentary that features David 
Attenborough trying to learn the day to day routines of african tribes. Others include Truth of 
the Armish and the many Danny Dyer documentaries.
PARTICIPATORY DOCUMENTARY : DANNY DYER 
DEADLIEST MEN 
This documentary series follows the celebrity Danny Dyer and his interations with some of the 
deadliest men. These include past murders and many gang leaders that can still pose danger. 
Like many participatory it involves Dyer getting involved with the people hearing them tell 
there stories and exploring there past. The documentary shows the truth behind many stories 
of these deadly men by becoming an eaquel to them. This really makes you see the world 
from there eyes without judgement and any opinionated facts. 
To see more of this documentary check : www.youtube.com/watch?v=Igq4lMXUWpc
REFLEXIVE DOCUMENTARY 
In a reflexive documentary they will show the process of the film maker making the 
documentary and the content within them. The viewer will typically be just as interested about 
the film is made and how the film is made just as much as its actual content. They will like 
most documentaries feature a lead narrator mostly in the role of explaining what is happening. 
It edjucates the audience of the difficulties of making a documentary film and the sort of 
situations they can get into. They are known to be more truthful as you are seeing most of the 
process and hopefully this means the film maker is being more realistic. The narrator will 
address the audience directly and tries to make the audience as involved as possible in the 
whole process. This has been commonly done in the past with bands and tours where you can 
see what is happening and how strange the documentary process is but it still focuses on the 
main subject and how their life if progressing including how it has got to an extent where a 
documentary is being made about them.
REFLEXIVE DOCUMENTARY : CATFISH 
Catfish the movie is classified as a reflexive documentary as the lead Nev sets of to make the 
documentary about his life this includes the fact that he’s making a documentary on his cyber 
dating story. Most of the footage comes from hand held camera held by his friends this makes 
it feel a little bit more realistic and exclusive for you as the audience is supossed to feel like 
they are there with them as they are going through this journey. The documentry had many 
sidescreens and graphics to break up the footage this may have been done to make the 
footage longer as they would have only captured the needed footage so to tell the story if 
further depth they would have needed to add extras such as sound and the added graphics 
and voice over.
PER FORMATIVE DOCUMENTARY 
This documentary is commonly done with celebrity's as it is based on experimenting and see 
the subjects reactions. It allows the subject or possibly the fil maker themselves with new 
experiences as they learn about various subjects. A lot like participatory they are getting 
involved with the subject but instead of being about the topic it is about the persons reactions 
this is why there often needs to be an interest in the person that is involved in the 
film/programme. They will try to involve the audience hopefully trying to get them to react 
emotionally this is similar to the charity videos that we see mostly on TV extraveganzas such 
a Children in need. They want us to react so that we get involved and donate so that we feel 
that we are helping the situation.

The codes and conventions of factual programming

  • 1.
    THE CONSTRUCTION OFFACTUAL PROGRAMMES – ISSUES, CODES AND CONVENTIONS By Sophie White
  • 2.
    INTRODUCTION In thispower point I am hoping to ilistrate the codes and coventions of factual programming and how they can inform and determine the audiences responses. I will also compare the 5 modes of documentary and analyse the conventions of news programmes.
  • 3.
    WHAT ARE THECODES AND CONVENTIONS OF FACTUAL PROGRAMMING ? There are many basic codes and conventions in factual production and these represent the typical signs and events that we generally see in any type of factual production whether this be TV documentries or TV news. These are often things that we don’t realise are planned and we think they are just meant to be there. This may be the main presenter on the news or the fact that every documentary will have shown basic evidence such as statistics that are not really noticed whilst watching but are there to prove the factual base of the story. These coventions can also vary depending on the audience for example if you are watching a political documentary the creater may want you to be outraged so they may edit the informations so they can get this reponce to do this would be following a convention of political documenties as many think that they alter there information to make the situation controversial. This will be very different if they just want to inform the audience as they might just do ths by stating the correct facts and showing evidence. The audiences response can be controlled by the documentary and how they chose to structure it. These structures come in the shape of the 5 modes.
  • 4.
    EXPOSITORY DOCUMENTARY Themain purpose of an expository documentary is to create and fight for a particular subject possibly making a controversial argument. They will tend to feature many facts and statistics to use as evidence to make you believe just that little bit more. The main presenter/narrator will speak directly to the viewer trying to get them to engage and interact with the evidence they are presenting overall trying to pursuade you to their side. There main goal is to get you to change your thoughts on that particular subject. They will use a clear narrator that is not often seen this will make the voice appear authoritive this authority often makes us trust them. This narrator will most likely address the audience directly again this is trying to pull in the audience and wants to make you a part of there argument. These documentries have a lot of controvosy surronding them as they often are opionated and can provide false evidence and they often alter footage so that it suits their purposes. There are many examples of expository documentries such as Americas most wanted, Paranormal experiences and many more.
  • 5.
    EXPOSITORY DOCUMENTRY :BENEFITS STREET Benefits street is a popular and controversial documentry that appeared on channel 4. It documents the life of the families on the famous benefits street which is the most highly populated area of benefit claimers. This documentry follows many of the key themes of expository documentry and follows many of its codes and coventions such as there being a narrator that never appears in front of the camera instead it becomes reliants on the family and short interviews where the family make there point. They also have created this documentry to make it opinionated as it grasps peoples attention and has a varied response after it was found that they altered most of there footage to suit there needs. Instead of using facts and figures as many expository documentries do they instead have let the footage of the street occupiers to speak for themselves . Overall the documentry was controversial and this is the main impact and purpose of an expository documentry. To see an example of benefits street see : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XkKJQF1xSJU
  • 6.
    OBSERVATIONAL DOCUMENTRY Observationaldocumentry is basically just what it sounds like it is when the main creater will just observe the the subject with minimal interaction possible. This does mean that they are shot informally on the go sometimes with just a handheld camera they also will feature not interviews and possibly may have no voice over. They allow the events speak for themeselves. You may also hear these documentries being refered to as “fly on the wall “ documenties this is just what they want to reanact in the documentry itself. These documentries will have no given agenda this means they can show whats happeing without having the impact of being bias or trying to opininate an audience. This means there will be a lack of facts and figure although they still may feature them to edjucate the audinece. In modern times these documentries often come in the form of reality TV such as the popular shows like big brother or Made in Chelsea.
  • 7.
    OBSERVATIONAL DOCUMENTRY :BIG BROTHER Big Brother Is a very modern take on observational documentry it follows a group of people as they competing in tasks while they are trapped in a house away from the civilisations outside. In the recent year it has become a staple on our TV’s. Big Brother has many of the features of an observational documentry for one it is all shot through cctv camera and has no interuption by the main maker of the documentry instead it allows the events to flow as they do. This can mainly be seen through the many times that filming is not always needed like while they are sleeping or even how they carry out there daily lives but we see it all anyway. I think that these are mostly watched because it allows the audience to be nossy and see how others live and how they can face problems such as the tasks set. To see a clip of big brother check : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AoP34cfyfv8
  • 8.
    PARTICIPATORY DOCUMENTARY Participatoryis the direct opposite of observational, instead of stopping any interuption with the subject it instead tries to get as involved as possible whether this is trying to takepart in the subjects daily events or just interviewing them. The filmaker will record the interactions between them and the subject hopefully gaining more experience to portrait the the subject to the audience more realistically. This does mean that the film maker is heavily featured in the documentary this also allows you to see how it changes them. These documentaries are very intrusive on the subjects life and often mean that both them and the film maker have to diverege as much imformation as possible not only on there experience but also their lives. They are mostly filmed on handheld cameras that are not hard to carry or use on a day to day basis so that life can go on as normal as possible. These are a popular choice of documentary when people are trying to learn new cultures such as the documentary that features David Attenborough trying to learn the day to day routines of african tribes. Others include Truth of the Armish and the many Danny Dyer documentaries.
  • 9.
    PARTICIPATORY DOCUMENTARY :DANNY DYER DEADLIEST MEN This documentary series follows the celebrity Danny Dyer and his interations with some of the deadliest men. These include past murders and many gang leaders that can still pose danger. Like many participatory it involves Dyer getting involved with the people hearing them tell there stories and exploring there past. The documentary shows the truth behind many stories of these deadly men by becoming an eaquel to them. This really makes you see the world from there eyes without judgement and any opinionated facts. To see more of this documentary check : www.youtube.com/watch?v=Igq4lMXUWpc
  • 10.
    REFLEXIVE DOCUMENTARY Ina reflexive documentary they will show the process of the film maker making the documentary and the content within them. The viewer will typically be just as interested about the film is made and how the film is made just as much as its actual content. They will like most documentaries feature a lead narrator mostly in the role of explaining what is happening. It edjucates the audience of the difficulties of making a documentary film and the sort of situations they can get into. They are known to be more truthful as you are seeing most of the process and hopefully this means the film maker is being more realistic. The narrator will address the audience directly and tries to make the audience as involved as possible in the whole process. This has been commonly done in the past with bands and tours where you can see what is happening and how strange the documentary process is but it still focuses on the main subject and how their life if progressing including how it has got to an extent where a documentary is being made about them.
  • 11.
    REFLEXIVE DOCUMENTARY :CATFISH Catfish the movie is classified as a reflexive documentary as the lead Nev sets of to make the documentary about his life this includes the fact that he’s making a documentary on his cyber dating story. Most of the footage comes from hand held camera held by his friends this makes it feel a little bit more realistic and exclusive for you as the audience is supossed to feel like they are there with them as they are going through this journey. The documentry had many sidescreens and graphics to break up the footage this may have been done to make the footage longer as they would have only captured the needed footage so to tell the story if further depth they would have needed to add extras such as sound and the added graphics and voice over.
  • 12.
    PER FORMATIVE DOCUMENTARY This documentary is commonly done with celebrity's as it is based on experimenting and see the subjects reactions. It allows the subject or possibly the fil maker themselves with new experiences as they learn about various subjects. A lot like participatory they are getting involved with the subject but instead of being about the topic it is about the persons reactions this is why there often needs to be an interest in the person that is involved in the film/programme. They will try to involve the audience hopefully trying to get them to react emotionally this is similar to the charity videos that we see mostly on TV extraveganzas such a Children in need. They want us to react so that we get involved and donate so that we feel that we are helping the situation.