The document discusses three documentaries about a murder case from the murderer's perspective, tracking people's health progress, and comparing "supersize" vs "super skinny" individuals and tracking their weight fluctuations. The document notes that one documentary used close-ups to show gestures during an interview with a murderer, while another about medical cases used long shots to capture everything happening. In general, the documentaries employed techniques like fly-on-the-wall filming, handheld cameras, voiceovers, and interviews to maintain realism without heavy editing.

2. SOME INTERESTING TOPICS
• Police. About a murder and talking
to the murderer and seeing their
point of view.
• Health and tracking someone's
progress
• Supersize vs. super skinny and
tracking their progress.

3. WHAT DID YOU LIKE ABOUT THE
DOCUMENTARIES
• I like how you were able to see another point of view and were put in the
shoes of a murderer and how they felt.
• Supersize vs. super skinny I liked how they showed why they became
over weight and what triggered it of and also why they became
underweight.
• I liked how in extreme A & E the tracked their progresses and then at the
end they would show the person fully recovered and how they felt about
the whole experience.

4. CONVENTIONS
Interview of
real people
Fly on the wall
Hand held camera
Fly on the wall
Voice overs
Real footage of an event that has happened
Interviews
The use of texts and titles

5. Titles

6. FORMS
There is not a lot of cuts in the documentaries that I watched
Also there is not a lot of transitions this because they do not edit it much
as if they would it would take away the realism of the documentary.
In the murder documentary there was close ups of the hand gestures and
the way she was nervous
However in the extreme A & E there was mostly long shots as they would
want to show everything that was going on.