WHY it is important to see documents for yourself. There are NO EXHIBITS to SUPPORT Sex Allegations made - Just MERE Words - with JEWS at the HELM OF THE SHIP!
Brown Opposition To Plaintiff Motion To Amend ComplaintJRachelle
This document is a memorandum filed by Susan M. Brown and the Law Offices of Susan M. Brown in opposition to Howard K. Stern's motion to amend his complaint to join them as additional defendants. The memorandum argues that the motion to amend should be denied on the grounds of prejudice and futility. It asserts that Brown would be prejudiced by the late addition as a defendant since discovery is largely complete. It also argues that the attempts to apply California law are futile since South Carolina law applies, and that the complaint fails to properly plead causes of action under South Carolina law against Brown.
SC Opinion and Order - motion for comtemptJRachelle
The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's motion for contempt and sanctions. The court found Susan Brown, the attorney, in contempt for violating a consent order requiring her to turn over all copies of estate property. However, the court did not find Ben Thompson, Brown's former client, in contempt as there was no clear evidence he violated the order. As a sanction, the court ordered Brown to pay the plaintiff's reasonable attorney's fees and costs for bringing the contempt motion, but no other punitive sanctions. The court also ordered Brown and Thompson to turn over any remaining estate property.
Stern Response to motion to dismiss 8-20-10JRachelle
This document is the Executor's response in opposition to a motion to dismiss filed by Susan M. Brown and The Law Offices of Susan M. Brown. The Executor argues that the motion to dismiss should be denied for three reasons: 1) Brown is raising the same arguments that the court already rejected in granting leave to amend the complaint, 2) the Executor has properly stated claims for both statutory and common law misappropriation of publicity rights, and 3) even if the motion to dismiss is granted, there are six other valid causes of action against Brown that would remain in the case.
ORDER MOTION TO COMPEL Doc.90 05-10-2016
READS and part:After discussing these issues with Plaintiff and Defendants’ counsel, and in part with Defendants’ counsel’s consent, the motion to compel is GRANTED in part and it is hereby
ORDRED that:
(1) Defendants shall produce a digital log of the history of the videos as well as relevant metadata for each video that may indicate the identity of the officer who was wearing the camera and any other relevant information, such as the time, date, and location of the video’s creation.
(2) Defendants shall produce an affidavit from Captain Haley stating whether any of the interviews he conducted with Plaintiff were not recorded and, if not, explaining why any interview was not recorded.
(3) Defendants shall produce any written reports prepared by the officers in attendance at the execution of the search warrant. If any officers did not prepare a written report, Defendants have agreed to provide an affidavit stating which officers did not prepare reports. If any officers were not wearing a body camera at the time of the execution of the warrant, Defendants will include this fact in the affidavit and state which officers had no cameras.
(4) Plaintiff may re-issue his subpoena to Taser, International. This new subpoena shall be limited in scope to the date and time of the execution of the warrant and to the named defendant officers who were present during the search of Plaintiff’s residence. Plaintiff shall not include any request for any video footage from Captain Haley in this subpoena.
Defendants are to comply with the terms of this order within 21 days of the date of this order.
Any other relief requested in Plaintiff’s motions to compel is DENIED.
The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to the pro se plaintiff at his address of
record.
It is so ORDERED.
Entered: May 5, 2016
This document is a request for entry of default against defendants in a civil rights lawsuit. It states that the plaintiff sued the defendants on July 9th for violations of his civil rights. It then asserts that the defendants were properly served but failed to file a responsive pleading within 20 days as required. As the defendants did not defend the suit in any way, the plaintiff is entitled to have the clerk enter a default against the defendants. The document provides documentation to support the service and argues the procedural requirements for default have been met. The plaintiff requests the clerk enter default in his favor against the defendants.
BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF AMENDED PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL WITH SANCTIONSAlvin Sutherlin, Jr
This document is a brief in support of a motion to compel the production of body camera footage and related records from a 2013 police incident. It alleges that key exculpatory footage was withheld from the plaintiff during criminal proceedings, in violation of discovery obligations and his civil rights. It requests that the court order the defendants to produce unedited body camera footage and audit records to identify all footage from the named officers involved in the incident.
Recent Developments in Rhode Island Law 2014 - State Courts and Civil ProcedureNicole Benjamin
This document summarizes recent developments in Rhode Island law from 2014, focusing on state courts and civil procedure. Key points include: the launch of electronic filing in civil cases beginning in November 2014; changes to the Providence County civil non-dispositive motion calendar eliminating the call of the calendar; and several issues of first impression addressed by the Rhode Island Supreme Court during the 2013-2014 term related to admiralty law, appellate practice, attorneys, class actions, commercial law, and medical malpractice.
Brown Opposition To Plaintiff Motion To Amend ComplaintJRachelle
This document is a memorandum filed by Susan M. Brown and the Law Offices of Susan M. Brown in opposition to Howard K. Stern's motion to amend his complaint to join them as additional defendants. The memorandum argues that the motion to amend should be denied on the grounds of prejudice and futility. It asserts that Brown would be prejudiced by the late addition as a defendant since discovery is largely complete. It also argues that the attempts to apply California law are futile since South Carolina law applies, and that the complaint fails to properly plead causes of action under South Carolina law against Brown.
SC Opinion and Order - motion for comtemptJRachelle
The court granted in part and denied in part the plaintiff's motion for contempt and sanctions. The court found Susan Brown, the attorney, in contempt for violating a consent order requiring her to turn over all copies of estate property. However, the court did not find Ben Thompson, Brown's former client, in contempt as there was no clear evidence he violated the order. As a sanction, the court ordered Brown to pay the plaintiff's reasonable attorney's fees and costs for bringing the contempt motion, but no other punitive sanctions. The court also ordered Brown and Thompson to turn over any remaining estate property.
Stern Response to motion to dismiss 8-20-10JRachelle
This document is the Executor's response in opposition to a motion to dismiss filed by Susan M. Brown and The Law Offices of Susan M. Brown. The Executor argues that the motion to dismiss should be denied for three reasons: 1) Brown is raising the same arguments that the court already rejected in granting leave to amend the complaint, 2) the Executor has properly stated claims for both statutory and common law misappropriation of publicity rights, and 3) even if the motion to dismiss is granted, there are six other valid causes of action against Brown that would remain in the case.
ORDER MOTION TO COMPEL Doc.90 05-10-2016
READS and part:After discussing these issues with Plaintiff and Defendants’ counsel, and in part with Defendants’ counsel’s consent, the motion to compel is GRANTED in part and it is hereby
ORDRED that:
(1) Defendants shall produce a digital log of the history of the videos as well as relevant metadata for each video that may indicate the identity of the officer who was wearing the camera and any other relevant information, such as the time, date, and location of the video’s creation.
(2) Defendants shall produce an affidavit from Captain Haley stating whether any of the interviews he conducted with Plaintiff were not recorded and, if not, explaining why any interview was not recorded.
(3) Defendants shall produce any written reports prepared by the officers in attendance at the execution of the search warrant. If any officers did not prepare a written report, Defendants have agreed to provide an affidavit stating which officers did not prepare reports. If any officers were not wearing a body camera at the time of the execution of the warrant, Defendants will include this fact in the affidavit and state which officers had no cameras.
(4) Plaintiff may re-issue his subpoena to Taser, International. This new subpoena shall be limited in scope to the date and time of the execution of the warrant and to the named defendant officers who were present during the search of Plaintiff’s residence. Plaintiff shall not include any request for any video footage from Captain Haley in this subpoena.
Defendants are to comply with the terms of this order within 21 days of the date of this order.
Any other relief requested in Plaintiff’s motions to compel is DENIED.
The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to the pro se plaintiff at his address of
record.
It is so ORDERED.
Entered: May 5, 2016
This document is a request for entry of default against defendants in a civil rights lawsuit. It states that the plaintiff sued the defendants on July 9th for violations of his civil rights. It then asserts that the defendants were properly served but failed to file a responsive pleading within 20 days as required. As the defendants did not defend the suit in any way, the plaintiff is entitled to have the clerk enter a default against the defendants. The document provides documentation to support the service and argues the procedural requirements for default have been met. The plaintiff requests the clerk enter default in his favor against the defendants.
BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF AMENDED PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO COMPEL WITH SANCTIONSAlvin Sutherlin, Jr
This document is a brief in support of a motion to compel the production of body camera footage and related records from a 2013 police incident. It alleges that key exculpatory footage was withheld from the plaintiff during criminal proceedings, in violation of discovery obligations and his civil rights. It requests that the court order the defendants to produce unedited body camera footage and audit records to identify all footage from the named officers involved in the incident.
Recent Developments in Rhode Island Law 2014 - State Courts and Civil ProcedureNicole Benjamin
This document summarizes recent developments in Rhode Island law from 2014, focusing on state courts and civil procedure. Key points include: the launch of electronic filing in civil cases beginning in November 2014; changes to the Providence County civil non-dispositive motion calendar eliminating the call of the calendar; and several issues of first impression addressed by the Rhode Island Supreme Court during the 2013-2014 term related to admiralty law, appellate practice, attorneys, class actions, commercial law, and medical malpractice.
- The Special Victim Counsel filed a response opposing the Defense Motion to Admit Evidence under M.R.E. 412 regarding a sexual assault case.
- The response argues that testimony about conversations and interactions between the victim and others falls under M.R.E. 412's general prohibition against evidence of a victim's sexual behavior and does not meet any exceptions.
- No exception applies because the Defense did not demonstrate that the evidence was constitutionally required or establish how it proved bias or a motive to fabricate that was relevant to the case.
This summary provides the essential information from the appellant's brief in 3 sentences:
The appellant, Michael North, appealed the denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a search of his home. North argued the search violated the Fourth Amendment because the officers relied on an invalid warrant that did not sufficiently describe the place to be searched. The brief asserts the trial court incorrectly applied the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule, as the officers should have reasonably known the warrant was insufficient for the search conducted of North's separate residence.
This motion seeks to compel the defendants to comply with a previous court order and subpoena to produce body camera footage and documentation from officers involved in a search on September 25, 2013. The plaintiff argues the defendants have only provided some edited footage and have not produced footage from three named officers or supporting documentation as required. The plaintiff requests sanctions against the defendants for failing to comply with the court's prior order and subpoena under Rule 37.
This document is a memorandum of law in support of a motion to suppress evidence filed on behalf of defendant Meshiha Boatwright. It argues that Boatwright was illegally seized by police officers in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Specifically, it contends that the officers lacked reasonable suspicion to stop Boatwright as he entered an apartment building where he was an invited guest. The memorandum aims to contradict the police report describing the events and provide Boatwright's version of facts, asserting he did nothing suspicious to justify being detained. If the court finds the initial seizure unlawful, the memorandum argues all evidence obtained as a result must be suppressed.
The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal challenging the designation of a prothonotary rather than a judge as the case management judge for an action alleging government and judicial corruption. While reasons were not provided for the designation, the Court found that a prothonotary has authority to act as case management judge and that security of tenure alone did not require a judge in this politically sensitive case. The Court also rejected arguments that delays demonstrated unreasonableness, finding it reasonable for the prothonotary to defer motions until after disposition of the appeal. The Court concluded the designation was not an error warranting intervention.
1. Gawker Media and its counsel Gregg Thomas filed a motion for summary judgment against the FBI and EOUSA in order to compel the release of records related to the FBI's 2012 investigation into a sex tape involving Hulk Hogan.
2. The FBI investigation looked into the source and distribution of the sex tape, including a Los Angeles lawyer who tried to sell the tape to Hogan. However, no one was ever prosecuted related to the investigation.
3. Gawker requested the records under FOIA to aid in its defense against Hogan's $100 million lawsuit over Gawker's reporting on the sex tape. The EOUSA did not respond to the request, while the FBI denied it,
This document provides a summary of experience for Adam Schwartz, a Senior Staff Counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois since 2002. It details his extensive experience in legal advocacy, legislative advocacy, and communications advocacy in numerous areas including freedom of expression, juvenile justice, police accountability, and technology/privacy. It provides examples of representative cases he has worked on and amicus briefs filed. It also outlines his legal education background and qualifications.
This document is a motion filed by Howard K. Stern as executor of Anna Nicole Smith's estate. It seeks to hold the defendant G. Ben Thompson and his attorney Susan Brown in contempt of court for violating a court order. The order required Brown to turn over duplicates of estate property within 10 days, but she failed to do so for over 9 months. The motion requests sanctions against Thompson and Brown, including striking defenses, awarding legal fees, and ordering the immediate turnover of all estate property.
- Congressman James Sensenbrenner, author of the Patriot Act, filed an amicus brief in support of plaintiffs challenging the NSA's mass telephone metadata collection program.
- He argues that Congress intended to authorize collection of documents and records only upon a showing of relevance to an authorized investigation, not a blanket collection of all telephone call records.
- Sensenbrenner also asserts that Congress did not intend to authorize indiscriminate collection of data on every telephone call to or from the US, which violates the privacy of millions of innocent Americans.
The document discusses Ashutosh Mukhopadhyay's invention for recycling non-recyclable laminated packaging waste.
1) The invention is a process for de-laminating laminated packaging waste to recover different materials like plastic, metal and paper. It was initially a manual process but has now been mechanized.
2) The mechanized process has been proven through prototypes and reduces costs while processing higher volumes of waste. Patents have been granted in several countries.
3) Implementing the recycling process across India is estimated to generate over $267 million USD annually in economic gains through materials recovery and avoided pollution costs.
This document discusses responsive web design and how it allows websites to adapt to different screen sizes and devices. It introduces some key concepts of responsive design including flexible grid-based layouts, flexible images and media, and media queries. It provides examples of how to use these techniques like converting pixel sizes to relative units and setting breakpoints with media queries. The goal of responsive design is to think about the user's needs on different devices and help future-proof websites.
The UK court ruled that radical Islamist cleric Abu Hamza al-Masri could be extradited to the US to face terror charges. He lost his final appeal and his request for more medical tests to avoid extradition. Abu Hamza is accused of supporting al-Qaeda and being involved in a hostage taking in Yemen in 1998 where four hostages were killed. If convicted in the US, he could face over 100 years in prison.
032215 - EMAIL CONFIRMATION TO TEMPSTAFF (Pam Quick) & MS Congressman Bennie ...VogelDenise
The document is a 6-page letter from Denise Newsome to Pam Quick at TempStaff and Congressman Bennie Thompson regarding filing an EEOC charge against First Heritage Credit and Merchants FoodService. Some key points:
- Newsome filed an EEOC charge against First Heritage Credit on February 9th but it was not accepted due to a computer issue and she refiled on February 13th.
- The EEOC dismissed the charge as untimely but Newsome disputes this, believing it was timely filed within 180-300 days of ongoing discriminatory practices.
- Newsome believes her employment at Merchants FoodService was abruptly ended in retaliation for filing the E
BARACK OBAMA Administration's WILLIE LYNCH and JIM CROW Practices (ENGLISH)VogelDenise
Translation of this document is forthcoming. Please be patient in that it appears SlideShare is OBSTRUCTING Newsome’s sharing information with the PUBLIC. Although Vogel Denis has a PRO Account with SlideShare which provides for UNLIMITED uploads of documents one may, like Newsome, may want to QUESTION the ABRUPT interruption with sharing such IMPORTANT information in which the PUBLIC may have an interest in. Information that BIAS Media sources would like to keep out of MAINSTREAM circulation. :-)
This document lists over 30 links to slideshow presentations on the website www.vogeldenisenewsome.net. The slideshows are in Danish and appear to make allegations against policies and actions of President Barack Obama, the US Congress, the Supreme Court, and other government bodies and officials. The slideshows address topics like requests for Obama's impeachment, the Trayvon Martin case, US wars, Julian Assange, and responses to letters from organizations like the EEOC.
- The Special Victim Counsel filed a response opposing the Defense Motion to Admit Evidence under M.R.E. 412 regarding a sexual assault case.
- The response argues that testimony about conversations and interactions between the victim and others falls under M.R.E. 412's general prohibition against evidence of a victim's sexual behavior and does not meet any exceptions.
- No exception applies because the Defense did not demonstrate that the evidence was constitutionally required or establish how it proved bias or a motive to fabricate that was relevant to the case.
This summary provides the essential information from the appellant's brief in 3 sentences:
The appellant, Michael North, appealed the denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a search of his home. North argued the search violated the Fourth Amendment because the officers relied on an invalid warrant that did not sufficiently describe the place to be searched. The brief asserts the trial court incorrectly applied the good faith exception to the exclusionary rule, as the officers should have reasonably known the warrant was insufficient for the search conducted of North's separate residence.
This motion seeks to compel the defendants to comply with a previous court order and subpoena to produce body camera footage and documentation from officers involved in a search on September 25, 2013. The plaintiff argues the defendants have only provided some edited footage and have not produced footage from three named officers or supporting documentation as required. The plaintiff requests sanctions against the defendants for failing to comply with the court's prior order and subpoena under Rule 37.
This document is a memorandum of law in support of a motion to suppress evidence filed on behalf of defendant Meshiha Boatwright. It argues that Boatwright was illegally seized by police officers in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Specifically, it contends that the officers lacked reasonable suspicion to stop Boatwright as he entered an apartment building where he was an invited guest. The memorandum aims to contradict the police report describing the events and provide Boatwright's version of facts, asserting he did nothing suspicious to justify being detained. If the court finds the initial seizure unlawful, the memorandum argues all evidence obtained as a result must be suppressed.
The Federal Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal challenging the designation of a prothonotary rather than a judge as the case management judge for an action alleging government and judicial corruption. While reasons were not provided for the designation, the Court found that a prothonotary has authority to act as case management judge and that security of tenure alone did not require a judge in this politically sensitive case. The Court also rejected arguments that delays demonstrated unreasonableness, finding it reasonable for the prothonotary to defer motions until after disposition of the appeal. The Court concluded the designation was not an error warranting intervention.
1. Gawker Media and its counsel Gregg Thomas filed a motion for summary judgment against the FBI and EOUSA in order to compel the release of records related to the FBI's 2012 investigation into a sex tape involving Hulk Hogan.
2. The FBI investigation looked into the source and distribution of the sex tape, including a Los Angeles lawyer who tried to sell the tape to Hogan. However, no one was ever prosecuted related to the investigation.
3. Gawker requested the records under FOIA to aid in its defense against Hogan's $100 million lawsuit over Gawker's reporting on the sex tape. The EOUSA did not respond to the request, while the FBI denied it,
This document provides a summary of experience for Adam Schwartz, a Senior Staff Counsel at the American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois since 2002. It details his extensive experience in legal advocacy, legislative advocacy, and communications advocacy in numerous areas including freedom of expression, juvenile justice, police accountability, and technology/privacy. It provides examples of representative cases he has worked on and amicus briefs filed. It also outlines his legal education background and qualifications.
This document is a motion filed by Howard K. Stern as executor of Anna Nicole Smith's estate. It seeks to hold the defendant G. Ben Thompson and his attorney Susan Brown in contempt of court for violating a court order. The order required Brown to turn over duplicates of estate property within 10 days, but she failed to do so for over 9 months. The motion requests sanctions against Thompson and Brown, including striking defenses, awarding legal fees, and ordering the immediate turnover of all estate property.
- Congressman James Sensenbrenner, author of the Patriot Act, filed an amicus brief in support of plaintiffs challenging the NSA's mass telephone metadata collection program.
- He argues that Congress intended to authorize collection of documents and records only upon a showing of relevance to an authorized investigation, not a blanket collection of all telephone call records.
- Sensenbrenner also asserts that Congress did not intend to authorize indiscriminate collection of data on every telephone call to or from the US, which violates the privacy of millions of innocent Americans.
The document discusses Ashutosh Mukhopadhyay's invention for recycling non-recyclable laminated packaging waste.
1) The invention is a process for de-laminating laminated packaging waste to recover different materials like plastic, metal and paper. It was initially a manual process but has now been mechanized.
2) The mechanized process has been proven through prototypes and reduces costs while processing higher volumes of waste. Patents have been granted in several countries.
3) Implementing the recycling process across India is estimated to generate over $267 million USD annually in economic gains through materials recovery and avoided pollution costs.
This document discusses responsive web design and how it allows websites to adapt to different screen sizes and devices. It introduces some key concepts of responsive design including flexible grid-based layouts, flexible images and media, and media queries. It provides examples of how to use these techniques like converting pixel sizes to relative units and setting breakpoints with media queries. The goal of responsive design is to think about the user's needs on different devices and help future-proof websites.
The UK court ruled that radical Islamist cleric Abu Hamza al-Masri could be extradited to the US to face terror charges. He lost his final appeal and his request for more medical tests to avoid extradition. Abu Hamza is accused of supporting al-Qaeda and being involved in a hostage taking in Yemen in 1998 where four hostages were killed. If convicted in the US, he could face over 100 years in prison.
032215 - EMAIL CONFIRMATION TO TEMPSTAFF (Pam Quick) & MS Congressman Bennie ...VogelDenise
The document is a 6-page letter from Denise Newsome to Pam Quick at TempStaff and Congressman Bennie Thompson regarding filing an EEOC charge against First Heritage Credit and Merchants FoodService. Some key points:
- Newsome filed an EEOC charge against First Heritage Credit on February 9th but it was not accepted due to a computer issue and she refiled on February 13th.
- The EEOC dismissed the charge as untimely but Newsome disputes this, believing it was timely filed within 180-300 days of ongoing discriminatory practices.
- Newsome believes her employment at Merchants FoodService was abruptly ended in retaliation for filing the E
BARACK OBAMA Administration's WILLIE LYNCH and JIM CROW Practices (ENGLISH)VogelDenise
Translation of this document is forthcoming. Please be patient in that it appears SlideShare is OBSTRUCTING Newsome’s sharing information with the PUBLIC. Although Vogel Denis has a PRO Account with SlideShare which provides for UNLIMITED uploads of documents one may, like Newsome, may want to QUESTION the ABRUPT interruption with sharing such IMPORTANT information in which the PUBLIC may have an interest in. Information that BIAS Media sources would like to keep out of MAINSTREAM circulation. :-)
This document lists over 30 links to slideshow presentations on the website www.vogeldenisenewsome.net. The slideshows are in Danish and appear to make allegations against policies and actions of President Barack Obama, the US Congress, the Supreme Court, and other government bodies and officials. The slideshows address topics like requests for Obama's impeachment, the Trayvon Martin case, US wars, Julian Assange, and responses to letters from organizations like the EEOC.
Android es un sistema operativo móvil basado en Linux diseñado para teléfonos inteligentes, tabletas y otros dispositivos. Utiliza un framework de aplicaciones que permite el reuso y reemplazo de componentes, una máquina virtual optimizada para dispositivos móviles, y soporte integrado para navegación web, almacenamiento de datos, y formatos de audio, video e imágenes. También admite características como Bluetooth, WiFi, cámaras y GPS, dependiendo del hardware.
BAKER DONELSON - KAKOSCH vs SIEMENS CORPORATION (Docket Sheet)VogelDenise
This document is a civil docket report from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana regarding a RICO case filed by Hanno Kakosch against Siemens Corporation and several other defendants. It lists motions, responses, orders, and summons issued in the case. The case was ultimately dismissed on January 28, 2015 after the defendants filed a motion to dismiss and Kakosch responded in opposition and was granted leave to file a reply.
United states’ response to motion for return of propertyCocoselul Inaripat
The United States responded to the defendant's motion for return of property seized during a search. Some of the seized property may be subject to return, while other items are still considered evidence or have been forfeited. The response includes affidavits from agents and prosecutors addressing the status of each seized item, with some items having already been returned or determined unavailable. Efforts have been made to return eligible property to the designated recipient, but contact information is needed for full return of one laptop.
Motion for Leave To Amend And Add Known Jane DoesJRachelle
This document is a motion filed by Howard K. Stern as executor of the estate of Vickie Lynn Marshall (Anna Nicole Smith) in a civil action. It requests leave from the court to amend and supplement the original complaint, join additional defendants, and amend the case caption. The motion states that discovery has revealed new information supporting the original claims and identifying previously unknown defendants. It also describes events that have occurred since the original complaint that could be added. The executor seeks to add claims involving additional conversions of estate property and to join new parties involved in the unauthorized transfers.
Facebook Case_Decision and Order_LaPorteTodd Welch
This document summarizes a decision from a United States District Court regarding ongoing legal proceedings in a case between Paul Ceglia and Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook, Inc. The central issue is the authenticity of a contract allegedly signed by Ceglia and Zuckerberg in 2003 granting Ceglia partial ownership of Facebook. The decision addresses multiple pending motions from both parties, including Defendants' motion to compel Plaintiff to produce an attachment to a privileged email and Plaintiff's motion to strike an expert report submitted by Defendants. The court grants Defendants' motion to compel, denies Plaintiff's motion to strike, and denies Plaintiff's other pending motions.
The motion seeks partial summary judgment on the following grounds:
1) St. Paul breached its insurance contracts by refusing to defend Anderson against the EPA's 104(e) Request, as it constituted a "suit" under the policies.
2) St. Paul breached its contracts by refusing to defend against the General Notice Letter, which also constituted a "suit."
3) Anderson is entitled to a declaratory judgment that St. Paul has a continuing duty to defend Anderson against the 104(e) Request, General Notice Letter, and ongoing alternative dispute resolution process.
This document is a motion filed by the plaintiffs' attorneys requesting permission from the court to file a fourth amended complaint. Specifically, the motion requests: (1) changing the class definition; (2) removing Michele Reinhart as a plaintiff and adding George and Susie Pfau; and (3) adding claims against additional defendants including Central Asia Institute and MC Consulting for alleged RICO violations. The motion also details why the plaintiffs' counsel believes the additional claims and parties are necessary.
The document is an order from a United States Bankruptcy Court case dismissing an adversary proceeding with prejudice. The order approves a stipulation between the plaintiff Virgie Arthur and defendant Bonnie Gayle Stern to dismiss the adversary proceeding, with each party bearing their own costs and fees. The court retains jurisdiction over the interpretation and enforcement of the order.
Unopposed motion to disclose names of expert witnesses and supporting opinionsCocoselul Inaripat
The defendant filed an unopposed motion requesting the court to compel the government to disclose the names and opinions of any expert witnesses it intends to call at trial related to whether certain parts sold by the defendant were prohibited for export. The government indicated in discovery that experts would testify on this issue but had not yet disclosed the expert names or opinions. The motion stated disclosure was required by rules of criminal procedure and evidence, and the defendant could not retain rebuttal experts without this information. The government did not object to disclosing the expert information by December 17th.
The official motion filed with the New York State Court of Appeals, NY's highest court, to hear the case of Norse Energy v Town of Dryden over the town's vote to ban all fracking and drilling throughout the township.
Here is the sample of the 858 pages on Pacer files for Dinar Corp Court Case 1:15-cv-00538-WKW-TFM. I will be posting updates on this - if you are not a subscriber, visit
http://dinarrvnews.net/newsletter/
There are Iraqi Dinar Scams, some want you to buy currency, some want you to buy into their seminars, some want you to get asset protection, and some want you to buy reserves or layaways. Here is how I feel on the dinar, I have some, I'm probably going to put it up on eBay, then I'm buying silver. I got lied to, and so did you. The sooner you realize the mistake you made, the better off you will be.
http://www.slideshare.net/global-currency-reset/dinar-corp-1-15-cv00538wkwtfm-sample-court-documents
Frank A. Anderson, an attorney for the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), files a notice of appearance and request for electronic notice in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case of Allied Systems Holdings, Inc. Anderson certifies that he is a member in good standing of the DC and Eastern District of Wisconsin bars and will submit to this Court's jurisdiction. He requests notice of all matters in the bankruptcy case on behalf of the PBGC.
Motion for extension of time to file expert witness disclosuresCocoselul Inaripat
The defendant filed a motion for an extension of time to file expert witness disclosures. The defendant is charged with multiple counts related to violating the Iran embargo and arms export control acts, which require expert testimony. The government disclosed some expert witnesses on December 17th but the disclosure was incomplete. The defense needs additional time to hire experts and file disclosures once the government provides a full disclosure. The motion requests extending the deadline to disclose experts by 30 days after the government's full disclosure, as well as extending the deadline to file motions to dismiss until after reviewing the expert disclosures.
Motion for extension of time to file expert witness disclosuresCocoselul Inaripat
The defendant filed a motion for an extension of time to file expert witness disclosures. The defendant is charged with multiple counts related to violating the Iran embargo and arms export control acts, which require expert testimony. The government disclosed some expert witnesses on December 17th but the disclosure was incomplete. The defense needs additional time to hire experts and file disclosures once the government provides a full disclosure. The motion requests extending the deadline to disclose experts by 30 days after the government's full disclosure, as well as extending the deadline to file motions to dismiss until after reviewing the expert disclosures.
This document is a reply brief filed by defendants in a class action securities litigation case. It summarizes and responds to arguments made in the lead plaintiffs' opposition to the defendants' motion to dismiss. The defendants argue that the court can consider SEC filings, press releases, and transcripts referenced in their motion. They also contend that the lead plaintiffs have misstated facts and failed to provide the full context of disclosures made during the class period. The defendants assert that statements were not misleading and that the plaintiffs have not sufficiently pleaded scienter. Overall, the brief aims to persuade the court to dismiss the complaint with prejudice based on deficiencies in the plaintiffs' arguments and pleading.
Motion To Dismiss Raanan Katz Copyright Lawsuitrkcenters
Miami Heat minority owner Raanan Katz does not appreciate the photo of himself circulating on the internet, so he is suing Google and a Miami blogger for refusing to take it down.
And Raanan Katz, RK Centers Owner, apparently has enough money to sue anybody else who posts the photo.
Plaintiff Joan Silver was injured during a hypnotherapy session with Defendant Stanley Fine, a Baltimore County volunteer. Silver did not provide formal notice to the county of her potential lawsuit as required by law. Instead, some months later, she sent an informal email to her former boss, the County Executive, hinting at a possible lawsuit but not explicitly stating her intent. Defendant argues that Silver did not substantially comply with the notice requirement or show good cause for failing to comply. As such, Defendant's motion for summary judgment should be granted.
Brown reply memo support motion to dismissJRachelle
This document is the Brown Defendants' reply memorandum in support of their motion to dismiss portions of Howard Stern's amended complaint. It argues that the motion to dismiss is not precluded by the court's prior ruling allowing the amended complaint. It also argues that California procedural law, including its probate code and publicity rights statute, does not apply in this South Carolina district court case. Finally, it asserts that the publicity rights statute is not applicable to the Brown Defendants' alleged actions of providing materials to another law firm.
The defendant is disclosing an expert witness, William L. Clements, to testify in their case. Clements will testify about the ambiguity of International Trading in Arms Regulations and the scope of the United States Munitions List. Specifically, he will state that the regulations do not enumerate specific military parts and that manufacturer input is needed to determine if a part is for military use. Clements will also testify that some commercial parts may be included in military aircraft, so the use alone does not determine regulatory status. The defense is seeking additional expert witnesses on military aircraft parts and manufacturing.
The defendant is disclosing an expert witness, William L. Clements, to testify in their case. Clements will testify about the ambiguity of International Trading in Arms Regulations and the scope of the United States Munitions List. Specifically, he will state that the list does not enumerate specific military parts and that purely commercial parts can be included in military aircraft. Clements will also discuss the actions companies take to ensure compliance with regulations and that manufacturers are key to determining if an item is on the Munitions List. The defense is seeking additional expert witnesses on military aircraft parts manufacturing.
Similar to DOCKET - Andrea Constand vs William H Cosby (20)
Odia New Web Series at your fingerprint.mikedanoffice
Stay ahead of the curve with the latest in Odia entertainment! Our Odia new web series promise an exciting blend of fresh narratives, talented performances, and engaging plots. Immerse yourself in the evolving world of Odia storytelling with our curated selection of cutting-edge web content. for more visit: https://aaonxt.com/series
Sara Saffari: Turning Underweight into Fitness Success at 23get joys
Uncover the remarkable journey of Sara Saffari, whose transformation from underweight struggles to being recognized as a fitness icon at 23 underscores the importance of perseverance, discipline, and embracing a healthy lifestyle.
The Evolution of the Leonardo DiCaprio Haircut: A Journey Through Style and C...greendigital
Leonardo DiCaprio, a name synonymous with Hollywood stardom and acting excellence. has captivated audiences for decades with his talent and charisma. But, the Leonardo DiCaprio haircut is one aspect of his public persona that has garnered attention. From his early days as a teenage heartthrob to his current status as a seasoned actor and environmental activist. DiCaprio's hairstyles have evolved. reflecting both his personal growth and the changing trends in fashion. This article delves into the many phases of the Leonardo DiCaprio haircut. exploring its significance and impact on pop culture.
From Teacher to OnlyFans: Brianna Coppage's Story at 28get joys
At 28, Brianna Coppage left her teaching career to become an OnlyFans content creator. This bold move into digital entrepreneurship allowed her to harness her creativity and build a new identity. Brianna's experience highlights the intersection of technology and personal branding in today's economy.
Leonardo DiCaprio Super Bowl: Hollywood Meets America’s Favorite Gamegreendigital
Introduction
Leonardo DiCaprio is synonymous with Hollywood stardom and acclaimed performances. has a unique connection with one of America's most beloved sports events—the Super Bowl. The "Leonardo DiCaprio Super Bowl" phenomenon combines the worlds of cinema and sports. drawing attention from fans of both domains. This article delves into the multifaceted relationship between DiCaprio and the Super Bowl. exploring his appearances at the event, His involvement in Super Bowl advertisements. and his cultural impact that bridges the gap between these two massive entertainment industries.
Follow us on: Pinterest
Leonardo DiCaprio: The Hollywood Icon
Early Life and Career Beginnings
Leonardo Wilhelm DiCaprio was born in Los Angeles, California, on November 11, 1974. His journey to stardom began at a young age with roles in television commercials and educational programs. DiCaprio's breakthrough came with his portrayal of Luke Brower in the sitcom "Growing Pains" and later as Tobias Wolff in "This Boy's Life" (1993). where he starred alongside Robert De Niro.
Rise to Stardom
DiCaprio's career skyrocketed with his performance in "What's Eating Gilbert Grape" (1993). earning him his first Academy Award nomination. He continued to gain acclaim with roles in "Romeo + Juliet" (1996) and "Titanic" (1997). the latter of which cemented his status as a global superstar. Over the years, DiCaprio has showcased his versatility in films like "The Aviator" (2004). "Start" (2010), and "The Revenant" (2015), for which he finally won an Academy Award for Best Actor.
Environmental Activism
Beyond his film career, DiCaprio is also renowned for his environmental activism. He established the Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation in 1998, focusing on global conservation efforts. His commitment to ecological issues often intersects with his public appearances. including those related to the Super Bowl.
The Super Bowl: An American Institution
History and Significance
The Super Bowl is the National Football League (NFL) championship game. is one of the most-watched sporting events in the world. First played in 1967, the Super Bowl has evolved into a cultural phenomenon. featuring high-profile halftime shows, memorable advertisements, and significant media coverage. The event attracts a diverse audience, from avid sports fans to casual viewers. making it a prime platform for celebrities to appear.
Entertainment and Advertisements
The Super Bowl is not only about football but also about entertainment. The halftime show features performances by some of the biggest names in the music industry. while the commercials are often as anticipated as the game itself. Companies invest millions in Super Bowl ads. creating iconic and sometimes controversial commercials that capture public attention.
Leonardo DiCaprio's Super Bowl Appearances
A Celebrity Among the Fans
Leonardo DiCaprio's presence at the Super Bowl has noted several times. As a high-profile celebrity. DiCaprio attracts
The Unbelievable Tale of Dwayne Johnson Kidnapping: A Riveting Sagagreendigital
Introduction
The notion of Dwayne Johnson kidnapping seems straight out of a Hollywood thriller. Dwayne "The Rock" Johnson, known for his larger-than-life persona, immense popularity. and action-packed filmography, is the last person anyone would envision being a victim of kidnapping. Yet, the bizarre and riveting tale of such an incident, filled with twists and turns. has captured the imagination of many. In this article, we delve into the intricate details of this astonishing event. exploring every aspect, from the dramatic rescue operation to the aftermath and the lessons learned.
Follow us on: Pinterest
The Origins of the Dwayne Johnson Kidnapping Saga
Dwayne Johnson: A Brief Background
Before discussing the specifics of the kidnapping. it is crucial to understand who Dwayne Johnson is and why his kidnapping would be so significant. Born May 2, 1972, Dwayne Douglas Johnson is an American actor, producer, businessman. and former professional wrestler. Known by his ring name, "The Rock," he gained fame in the World Wrestling Federation (WWF, now WWE) before transitioning to a successful career in Hollywood.
Johnson's filmography includes blockbuster hits such as "The Fast and the Furious" series, "Jumanji," "Moana," and "San Andreas." His charismatic personality, impressive physique. and action-star status have made him a beloved figure worldwide. Thus, the news of his kidnapping would send shockwaves across the globe.
Setting the Scene: The Day of the Kidnapping
The incident of Dwayne Johnson's kidnapping began on an ordinary day. Johnson was filming his latest high-octane action film set to break box office records. The location was a remote yet scenic area. chosen for its rugged terrain and breathtaking vistas. perfect for the film's climactic scenes.
But, beneath the veneer of normalcy, a sinister plot was unfolding. Unbeknownst to Johnson and his team, a group of criminals had planned his abduction. hoping to leverage his celebrity status for a hefty ransom. The stage was set for an event that would soon dominate worldwide headlines and social media feeds.
The Abduction: Unfolding the Dwayne Johnson Kidnapping
The Moment of Capture
On the day of the kidnapping, everything seemed to be proceeding as usual on set. Johnson and his co-stars and crew were engrossed in shooting a particularly demanding scene. As the day wore on, the production team took a short break. providing the kidnappers with the perfect opportunity to strike.
The abduction was executed with military precision. A group of masked men, armed and organized, infiltrated the set. They created chaos, taking advantage of the confusion to isolate Johnson. Johnson was outnumbered and caught off guard despite his formidable strength and fighting skills. The kidnappers overpowered him, bundled him into a waiting vehicle. and sped away, leaving everyone on set in a state of shock and disbelief.
The Immediate Aftermath
The immediate aftermath of the Dwayne Johnson kidnappin
The Future of Independent Filmmaking Trends and Job OpportunitiesLetsFAME
The landscape of independent filmmaking is evolving at an unprecedented pace. Technological advancements, changing consumer preferences, and new distribution models are reshaping the industry, creating new opportunities and challenges for filmmakers and film industry jobs. This article explores the future of independent filmmaking, highlighting key trends and emerging job opportunities.
1. SEALDC,CLOSED,LEAD,STANDARD
United States District Court
Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:05−cv−01099−ER
CONSTAND v. COSBY
Assigned to: HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO
Cause: 28:1332 Diversity−Libel,Assault,Slander
Date Filed: 03/08/2005
Date Terminated: 11/08/2006
Jury Demand: Defendant
Nature of Suit: 320 P.I.: Assault Libel
&Slander
Jurisdiction: Diversity
Plaintiff
ANDREA CONSTAND represented by BEBE H. KIVITZ
JACOBS SINGER KIVITZ &HERMAN
LLC
1525 LOCUST ST 12TH FL
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19102
215−732−2656
Email: bkivitz@jskhlaw.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
ANN C. LEBOWITZ
200 SOUTH BROAD STREET
SUITE 600
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19102
215−893−4976
Fax: 215−790−0509
Email: acl@alebowitz.com
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
DOLORES M. TROIANI
TROIANI &GIBNEY LLP
131 LANCASTER AVE
DEVON, PA 19333
610−688−8400
Fax: MDL TERMINATED
Email: dmt@tglawoffice.com
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
V.
Defendant
WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR. represented by ANDREW D. SCHAU
COVINGTON &BURLING LLP
THE NEW YORK TIMES BLDG
620 EIGHTH AVE
NEW YORK, NY 10018
212−841−1007
Email: aschau@cov.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
PATRICK J. O'CONNOR
COZEN OCONNOR
1900 MARKET ST
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103
215−665−2024
Fax: 215−665−3701
Email: poconnor@cozen.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
Case: 2:05-cv-01099 As of: 12/04/2014 03:21 PM EST 1 of 10
2. ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
GEORGE M. GOWEN , III
COZEN O'CONNOR
1900 MARKET STREET
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103
215−665−2000
Fax: 215−665−2013
Email: ggowen@cozen.com
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
V.
Respondent
NATIONAL INQUIRER represented by JENNIFER B. JORDAN
MORGAN LEWIS &BOCKIUS LLP
1701 MARKET ST
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103−2921
215−963−5000
Email: jjordan@morganlewis.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
PAUL D. WELLER
MORGAN LEWIS &BOCKIUS LLP
1701 MARKET ST
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103
215−963−5530
Email: pweller@morganlewis.com
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
V.
Movant
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
TERMINATED: 01/13/2006
represented by GAYLE CHATILO SPROUL
LEVINE SULLIVAN KOCH &SCHULZ
LLP
1760 MARKET ST SUITE 1001
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103
215−988−9778
Fax: 215−988−9750
Email: gsproul@lskslaw.com
TERMINATED: 01/13/2006
LEAD ATTORNEY
MICHAEL BERRY
LEVINE SULLIVAN KOCH &SCHULZ
LLP
1760 MARKET ST STE 1001
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103
215−988−9778
Email: mberry@lskslaw.com
TERMINATED: 01/13/2006
Movant
JANE DOE WITNESSES represented by B. JOYCE THOMPSON DALE
204 SOUTH AVENUE
MEDIA, PA 19063−3121
LEAD ATTORNEY
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Case: 2:05-cv-01099 As of: 12/04/2014 03:21 PM EST 2 of 10
3. Date Filed # Docket Text
03/08/2005 1 COMPLAINT against WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR ( Filing fee $ 250 receipt number
914383.), filed by ANDREA CONSTAND.(ss, ) (Entered: 03/08/2005)
03/08/2005 Summons Issued, One original mailed as to WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR. Forwarded
To: Counsel on 3/8/05 (ss, ) (Entered: 03/08/2005)
03/08/2005 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by ANDREA CONSTAND. (ss, ) (Entered:
03/08/2005)
03/08/2005 2 NOTICE of Appearance by DOLORES M. TROIANI on behalf of ANDREA
CONSTAND (TROIANI, DOLORES) (Entered: 03/08/2005)
03/23/2005 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by ANDREA CONSTAND.
WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR waiver sent on 3/9/2005, answer due 5/9/2005. (afm, )
(as, ). (Entered: 03/23/2005)
03/31/2005 4 NOTICE of Appearance by GEORGE M. GOWEN, III on behalf of WILLIAM H.
COSBY, JR with Certificate of Service (GOWEN, GEORGE) (DOCKETED IN
ERROR ATTORNEY DELETED) Modified on 4/4/2005 (afm, ). (Entered:
03/31/2005)
04/04/2005 5 NOTICE of Appearance by PATRICK J. O'CONNOR on behalf of WILLIAM H.
COSBY, JR., Certificate of Service. (O'CONNOR, PATRICK) Modified on
4/5/2005 (np). (Entered: 04/04/2005)
04/04/2005 6 NOTICE of Appearance by GEORGE M. GOWEN, III on behalf of WILLIAM H.
COSBY, JR (GOWEN, GEORGE) (Entered: 04/04/2005)
04/06/2005 7 Report Of Plaintiff following Rule 26 Conference of Parties by ANDREA
CONSTAND, Certificate of Service. (Attachments: # 1 Preliminary Scheduling
Order) (KIVITZ, BEBE) Modified on 4/8/2005 (np). (Entered: 04/06/2005)
04/12/2005 8 NOTICE of Hearing: PRETRIAL CONFERENCE SET FOR 5/3/2005 12:30 PM
IN JUDGE'S CHAMBERS, Room 11614, BEFORE HONORABLE EDUARDO
C. ROBRENO. (to, ) (Entered: 04/12/2005)
04/12/2005 9 MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE OF ANDREW D. SCHAU,
ESQUIRE FILED BY WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR.,APPLICATION,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(afm, ) (Entered: 04/13/2005)
04/15/2005 10 MOTION to Compel Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures filed by WILLIAM H. COSBY,
JR.Memorandum. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order # 2
Memorandum)(O'CONNOR, PATRICK) (Entered: 04/15/2005)
04/18/2005 11 ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LIMITED ADMISSION IS
GRANTED.. SIGNED BY JUDGE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON
4/18/05.4/18/05 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND FAXED. (afm, ) (as, ).
(Entered: 04/18/2005)
04/19/2005 12 RESPONSE in Opposition re 10 MOTION to Compel Plaintiff's Initial Disclosures
, Memorandum of Law, Certificate of Service filed by ANDREA CONSTAND.
(KIVITZ, BEBE) (Entered: 04/19/2005)
04/19/2005 13 MOTION for Protective Order to Protect the Identity Rule 415 Jane Doe Witnesses
filed by ANDREA CONSTAND.Memorandum of Law, Certificate of
Service.(KIVITZ, BEBE) (Entered: 04/19/2005)
04/22/2005 14 MOTION for Leave to File Reply Memorandum filed by WILLIAM H. COSBY,
JR.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B)(O'CONNOR, PATRICK) (Entered:
04/22/2005)
04/22/2005 15 ORDER THAT THE INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IS RESCHEDULED
FOR 5/11/2005 AT 12:00 PM.. SIGNED BY JUDGE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO
ON 4/20/05. 4/22/05 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E−MAILED. XC
BY CHAMBERS 4/22/05.(afm, ) (Entered: 04/22/2005)
Case: 2:05-cv-01099 As of: 12/04/2014 03:21 PM EST 3 of 10
4. 04/25/2005 16 RESPONSE to defendant's MOTION FOR LEAV TO FILE REPLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF'S
INITIAL DISCLOSURES filed by ANDREA CONSTAND, CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE. (afm, ) (Entered: 04/25/2005)
04/27/2005 17 MOTION for Protective Order filed by WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR.Memorandum.
(Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order # 2 Memorandum# 3
Exhibits)(O'CONNOR, PATRICK) (Entered: 04/27/2005)
04/27/2005 18 Memorandum in Support of 13 MOTION for Protective Order to Protect the
Identity Rule 415 Jane Doe Witnesses and in Opposition to PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION TO PRECT THE IDENTITY OF RULE 415 JANE DOE WITNESSES
FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER filed by WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR. (Attachments: #
1 Exhibits) (O'CONNOR, PATRICK) Modified on 4/29/2005 (np). (Entered:
04/27/2005)
05/09/2005 19 MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY RESPONSES AND TO STRIKE
DEFENDANTS' GENERAL OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF
INTERROGATORIES FILED BY ANDREA CONSTAND,MEMORANDUM,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(afm, ) (Entered: 05/09/2005)
05/09/2005 20 RESPONSE to defendant's MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER filed by
ANDREA CONSTAND, MEMORANDUM, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (afm,
) (Entered: 05/09/2005)
05/09/2005 21 ANSWER to Complaint by WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR.(O'CONNOR, PATRICK)
(Entered: 05/09/2005)
05/10/2005 22 MOTION for Leave to File Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Protective Order
filed by WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR.Brief. (Attachments: # 1 Reply
Brief)(O'CONNOR, PATRICK) (Entered: 05/10/2005)
05/11/2005 23 Response re 21 Answer to Complaint to Affirmative Defenses by ANDREA
CONSTAND, Certificate of Service. (KIVITZ, BEBE) Modified on 5/13/2005
(np). (Entered: 05/11/2005)
05/12/2005 24 RESPONSE in Opposition re 22 MOTION for Leave to File Reply Brief in Support
of Motion for Protective Order and Memorandum of Law filed by ANDREA
CONSTAND. (KIVITZ, BEBE) (Entered: 05/12/2005)
05/13/2005 25 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on 5/11/05 before Judge HONORABLE
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO. Court Reporter: ESR. (afm, ) (Entered: 05/16/2005)
05/13/2005 26 MOTION TO INTERVENE AND TO FILE OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S
MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER FILED BY THE ASSOCIATED
PRESS,MEMORANDUM, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (Attachments: # 1
MEMO# 2 COS# 3 EXHIBIT A# 4 EXHIBIT B# 5 EXHIBIT C)(afm, ) (Entered:
05/16/2005)
05/24/2005 27 RESPONSE in Support re 26 MOTION to Intervene of the Associated Press filed
by ANDREA CONSTAND, Memorandum, Certificate of Service. (KIVITZ,
BEBE) Modified on 5/26/2005 (md, ). (Entered: 05/24/2005)
05/27/2005 28 RESPONSE in Opposition re 26 MOTION to Intervene filed by WILLIAM H.
COSBY, JR. (O'CONNOR, PATRICK) (Entered: 05/27/2005)
06/02/2005 29 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO
COMPEL INITIAL DISCLOSURES IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION
FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PROTECT THE IDENTITY OF HER RULE
415 JANE DOE WITNESS IS DENIED; DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR A
PROTECTIVE ORDER IS DENIED; DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO FILE A REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL
PLAINTIFF'S INITIAL DISCLOSURE IS GRANTED; DEFENDANT'S
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY MEMORDEUM IN SUPPORT OF
MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER IS GRANTED; AND THE
ASSOCIATED PRESS'S MOTION TO INTERVENE IS DENIED AS MOOT..
SIGNED BY JUDGE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 6/2/05.6/2/05 ENTERED
AND COPIES MAILED AND E−MAILED. (afm, ) (Entered: 06/02/2005)
Case: 2:05-cv-01099 As of: 12/04/2014 03:21 PM EST 4 of 10
5. 06/02/2005 30 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 1 THAT PENNSYLVANIA RULE OF
PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT 3.6 SHALL BE ADOPTED GOVERNING THE
CONDUCT OF COUNSEL, THE VIOLATIONS OF THIS ORDER SHALL BE
SUBJECT TO SANCTIONS, ETC..... SIGNED BY JUDGE EDUARDO C.
ROBRENO ON 6/2/05. 6/3/05 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND
E−MAILED.(afm, ) (Entered: 06/03/2005)
06/03/2005 31 ORDER THAT A CONFERENCE WILL BE HELD ON 6/22/2005 AT 02:00 PM
IN COURTROOM 11A.. SIGNED BY JUDGE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON
6/2/05. 6/3/05 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E−MAILED.(afm, )
(Entered: 06/03/2005)
06/10/2005 32 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Protective Order as to Jane Doe No. 8
filed by ANDREA CONSTAND.Certificate of Service.(KIVITZ, BEBE) (Entered:
06/10/2005)
06/13/2005 33 MOTION TO PROTECT DISCLOSURE OF THEIR NAMES OUTSIDE OF
THIS LITIGATION FILED BY JANE DOE WITNESSES,MEMORANDUM,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE..(afm, ) (Entered: 06/13/2005)
06/14/2005 34 ORDER THAT A HEARING TO ADDRESS PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO
EXTEND SUSPENSION PERIOD OF COURT'S ORDER REGARDING THE
IDENTITY OF JANE DOE WITNESSES AND TO PROTECT DISCLOSURE
OF THEIR NAMES WILL BE HELD ON 6/22/05 AT 2:00P.M. IN
COURTROOM 11A. SIGNED BY JUDGE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON
6/14/05. 6/15/05 ENTERED AND COPIES E−MAILED. FAXED BY
CHAMBERS 6/14/05.(afm, ) (Entered: 06/15/2005)
06/21/2005 35 RESPONSE to Motion re 32 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Protective
Order as to Jane Doe No. 8, 33 MOTION for Protective Order by Jane Doe
Witnesses filed by WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of
Patrick J.O'Connor)(O'CONNOR, PATRICK) (Entered: 06/21/2005)
06/24/2005 36 ORDER THAT THE COURT'S MEMORANDUM DATED 6/2/05 IS
AMENDED SO THAT THE FOLLOWING SENTENCE ON PAGE 12 IS
DELETED AND INSERTED IN LIEU THEREOF SHALL BE THE
FOLLOWING LANGUAGE: RULE 3.6 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA RULES OF
PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, IN ITS ORIGINAL INCARNATION,
INCLUDING WHAT IS NOW COMMENT 5, ETC....... SIGNED BY JUDGE
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 6/24/05. 6/24/05 ENTERED AND COPIES
MAILED AND E−MAILED.(afm, ) (Entered: 06/24/2005)
07/07/2005 37 ORDER THAT THE MOTION OF JANE DOE WITNESSES TO PROTECT
DISCLOSURE OF THEIR NAMES OUTSIDE OF THIS LITIGATION IS
DENIED; AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXTEND THE SUSPENSION
PERIOD OF THE COURT'S ORDER REGARDING THE IDENTITY OF JANE
DOE WITNESSES AS TO JANE DOE NO.8 IS DENIED. SIGNED BY JUDGE
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 7/6/05. 7/7/05 ENTERED AND COPIES
MAILED AND E−MAILED. (fdc) (Entered: 07/07/2005)
07/11/2005 38 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL AND STRIKE
OBJECTIONS IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; THE PARTIES SHALL
SUBMIT TO THE COURT A F.R.C.P. 26(f) REPORT BY 8/8/05.. SIGNED BY
JUDGE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 7/8/05.7/12/05 ENTERED AND COPIES
MAILED AND E−MAILED. (afm, ) (Entered: 07/12/2005)
07/22/2005 39 TRANSCRIPT of Hearing held on 6/22/05 before Judge Robreno. (fdc) (Entered:
07/22/2005)
08/18/2005 40 SCHEDULING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE AN AMENDED
COMPLAINT ASSERTING THE CITIZENSHIP OF THE PARTIES BY 8/29/05;
PLAINTIFF SHALL JOIN ANY ADDITIONAL DEFENDANTS BY 11/17/05;
ALL DISCOVERY SHALL BE COMPLETED BY 6/30/06; ANY MOTIONS
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SHALL BE FILED BY 6/30/06; PRETRIAL
MEMORANDA AND AMY MOTIONS IN LIMINE SHALL BE FILED BY
9/15/06; AND THE CASE SHALL BE PLACED IN THE TRIAL POOL ON
10/1/06, ETC.SIGNED BY JUDGE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 8/17/05.
8/19/05 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND FAXED.(cdd, ) Additional
Case: 2:05-cv-01099 As of: 12/04/2014 03:21 PM EST 5 of 10
6. attachment(s) added on 8/23/2005 (afm, ). (Entered: 08/19/2005)
08/24/2005 41 AMENDED COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against WILLIAM H. COSBY,
JR , filed by ANDREA CONSTAND, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(afm, )
(Entered: 08/25/2005)
09/08/2005 42 ANSWER to Amended Complaint by WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR.(O'CONNOR,
PATRICK) (Entered: 09/08/2005)
09/12/2005 43 ORDER THAT A DISCOVERY CONFERENCE WILL BE HELD ON 9/23/2005
AT 09:00 AM IN COURTROOM 11A.. SIGNED BY JUDGE EDUARDO C.
ROBRENO ON 9/9/05. 9/12/05 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND
E−MAILED.(afm, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 9/12/2005 (afm, ).
(Entered: 09/12/2005)
09/21/2005 44 ORDER THAT THE DISCOVERY CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR 9/23/05
IS CONTINUED TO 9/26/05 AT 10:30 A.M. IN COURTROOM 11A.. SIGNED
BY JUDGE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 9/21/05. 9/21/05 ENTERED AND
COPIES MAILED AND E−MAILED.(afm, ) (Entered: 09/21/2005)
09/27/2005 45 ORDER THAT AFTER A HEARING DISCUSSING DISCOVERY MATTERS
RAISED IN PLAINTIFF'S LETTERS DATED8/25/05 AND 9/8/05 AND
DEFENDANT'S LETTERS DATED 9/2/05 AND9/12/05 TO THE COURT, THE
MATTER HAVE BEEN RESOLVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COURT'S
RULING ON RECORD.. SIGNED BY JUDGE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON
9/26/05. 9/27/05 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E−MAILED.(afm, )
(Entered: 09/27/2005)
11/03/2005 46 ORDER THAT A TELEPHONE STATUS CONFERENCE WILL BE HELD ON
11/4/2005 AT 09:00 AM, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANT
SHALL CALL CHAMBERS.. SIGNED BY JUDGE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO
ON 11/2/05. 11/4/05 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E−MAILED.(afm,
) (Entered: 11/04/2005)
11/04/2005 47 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER THAT EACH PARTY SHALL FILE ANY
REQUEST TO COMPEL BY 11/21/05, RESPONSES THERETO DUE 12/6/05.
ANY PARTY OPPOSING THE LIFTING OF THE SEAL SHALL SHOW
CAUSE WHY THE SEAL SHOULD NOT BE LIFTED BY 12/21/05. ANY
PARTY SUPPORTING THE LIFTING OF THE SEAL SHALL FILE A
MEMORANDUM BY 1/9/06. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT ALL
REQUESTS FOR DISCOVERY, RESPONSES AND LEGAL MEMORANDA
FILED PURSUANT TO THIS ORDER SHALL BE FILED UNDER SEAL.
SIGNED BY JUDGE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 11/4/05. 11/4/05 ENTERED
AND COPIES MAILED, E−MAILED AND FAXED BY CHAMBERS.(stb, )
(Entered: 11/04/2005)
11/21/2005 48 MOTION FOR SANCTIONS CONCERNING CONDUCT OF DEFENDANT AT
DEPOSITION AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW FILED BY ANDREA
CONSTAND (FILED UNDER SEAL)..(afm, ) (Entered: 11/21/2005)
11/21/2005 49 DEFENDANTS' REQUEST TO COMPEL AND MEMO CONCERNING
OVERARCHING ISSUES by WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR. (FILED UNDER
SEAL) (afm, ) (Entered: 11/22/2005)
11/21/2005 50 MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY FILED BY ANDREA
CONSTAND,CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(afm, ) (FILED UNDER SEAL)
(Entered: 11/22/2005)
11/23/2005 51 Second MOTION to Intervene and to Unseal filed by THE ASSOCIATED
PRESS.Memorandum, Certificate of Service, Proposed Order. (Attachments: # 1
Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Intervene and Unseal# 2 Text of
Proposed Order Proposed Order# 3 Certificate of Service)(SPROUL, GAYLE)
(Entered: 11/23/2005)
11/28/2005 52 MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION CONCERNING CONDUCT OF
DEFENDANT'S DEPOSITION AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FILED BY
WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR.,MEMORANDUM, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
(FILED UNDER SEAL).(afm, ) (Entered: 11/28/2005)
Case: 2:05-cv-01099 As of: 12/04/2014 03:21 PM EST 6 of 10
7. 12/02/2005 53 ORDER THE ORIGINAL TRANSCRIPT OF THE THELEPHONE
CONFERENCE HELD ON 11/4/05 SHALL BE FILED OF RECORD EXCEPT
LINES 9−10 OF PAGE 8 AND LINES 1−2 OF PAGE 9 SHALL BE
REDACTED; PAGES 8 AND 9 UNREDACTED SHALL BE FILED UNDER
SEAL; LEAVE IS GRANTED TO COUNSEL TO RECIEVE THE
UNREDACTED PARTS OF ORIGINAL TRANSCRIPT FILED UNDER SEAL..
SIGNED BY JUDGE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 12/2/05. 12/5/05 ENTERED
AND COPIES MAILED AND E−MAILED.(afm, ) (Entered: 12/05/2005)
12/02/2005 54 REDACTED TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on 11/4/05 before Judge
HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO. Court Reporter: ESR. (afm, )
(Entered: 12/05/2005)
12/02/2005 55 PAGES 8 AND 9 OF THE REDACTED TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING ON
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE DATED 11/4/05. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (afm, )
(Entered: 12/05/2005)
12/02/2005 56 ORDER THAT THE PARTIES SHALL FILE A RESPONSE TO THE MOTION
TO INTERVENE AND LIFT THE SEAL BY 12/19/2005. A HEARING IS SET
FOR 1/9/2006 AT 10:00 A.M. IN COURTROOM 11−A BEFORE HONORABLE
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO. SIGNED BY JUDGE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON
12/2/05. 12/5/05 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND E−MAILED. (jpd)
(Entered: 12/05/2005)
12/05/2005 57 PLAINTIFF'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S REQUESTS TO COMPEL AND
MEMORANDUM CONCERNING OVERARCHING ISSUES by ANDREA
CONSTAND. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (afm, ) (Entered: 12/05/2005)
12/05/2005 59 RESPONSE TO THE MOTION OF THE ASSOCIATED PRESS TO
INTERVENE AND TO LIFT SEAL FILED BY ANDREA CONSTAND,
MEMORANDUM, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (Attachments: # 1
MEMO)(afm, ) (Entered: 12/08/2005)
12/06/2005 58 RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL AND MEMORANDUM
CONCERNING OVERARCHING ISSUES filed by WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR.,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (afm, ) (FILED UNDER SEAL) (Entered:
12/07/2005)
12/08/2005 60 RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION
CONCERNING CONDUCT OF DEFENDANT'S DEPOSITION AND MOTION
FOR SANCTIONS AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW FILE BY ANDREA
CONSTAND (FILE UNDER SEAL). (afm, ) (Entered: 12/08/2005)
12/08/2005 61 MOTION TO COMPEL THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER'S COMPLIANCE WITH
SUBPOENA FOR DOCUMENT AND REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED
RESOLUTION AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW FILED BY ANDREA
CONSTAND (FILED UNDER SEAL)..(afm, ) (Entered: 12/08/2005)
12/19/2005 62 RESPONSE in Opposition re 51 Second MOTION to Intervene and to Unseal filed
by WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR. (O'CONNOR, PATRICK) (Entered: 12/19/2005)
12/21/2005 63 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN PARTIAL OPPOSITION TO THE LIFTING OF
THE SEAL ESTABLISHED BY CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 2 by
WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (afm, ) (Entered: 12/22/2005)
12/22/2005 64 DEFENDANT'S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO
COMPEL THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER'S COMPLIANCE WITH SUBPOENA
FOR DOCUMENT AND REQUEST FOR EXPEDITED RESOLUTION filed by
WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR. (FILED UNDER SEAL) (afm, ) Modified on
12/28/2005 (cdd, ). (Entered: 12/23/2005)
12/27/2005 65 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO
COMPEL filed by NATIONAL INQUIRER (FILED UNDER SEAL). (afm, )
(Entered: 01/03/2006)
01/04/2006 66 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN
RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MEMO IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION TO COMPEL THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER'S COMPLIANCE WITH
Case: 2:05-cv-01099 As of: 12/04/2014 03:21 PM EST 7 of 10
8. SUBPOENA FOR DOCUMENTS ANDREA CONSTAND, CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE (FILED UNDER SEAL)..(afm, ) (Entered: 01/04/2006)
01/04/2006 67 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF THE LIFTING OF THE SEAL
ESTABLISHED BY CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 2 filed by ANDREA
CONSTAND, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE (FILED UNDER SEAL). (afm, )
(Entered: 01/04/2006)
01/05/2006 68 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PLAINTIFF' SREPLY TO THE NATIONAL
ENQUIRER'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'W
MOTION TO COMPEL FILED BY ANDREA CONSTAND, CERTIFICATE OF
SERVICE (FILED UNDER SEAL)..(afm, ) (Entered: 01/05/2006)
01/05/2006 69 ORDER THAT A HEARING ON 1/9/2006 AT 10:00 AM IN COURTROOM 11A
WILL ADDRESS FOLLOWING MOTIONS FOR SANCTIONS #48, COMPEL
DISCOVERY #50, TO STRIKE #52, ASSOCIATED'S MOTION TO
INTERVENE #51, MOTION TO COMPEL NATIONAL #61.. SIGNED BY
JUDGE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 1/4/06. 1/5/06 ENTERED. COPIES
FAXED BY CHAMBERS 1/5/06.(afm, ) (as, ). (Entered: 01/05/2006)
01/06/2006 70 NOTICE of Appearance by MICHAEL BERRY on behalf of THE ASSOCIATED
PRESS with Certificate of Service (BERRY, MICHAEL) (Entered: 01/06/2006)
01/10/2006 71 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on 9/26/05 before Judge ROBRENO. Court
Reporter: J. MATKOWSKI. HEARING (jl, ) (Entered: 01/10/2006)
01/13/2006 72 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT THE MOVANT ASSOCIATED
PRESS'S MOTION TO INTERVENE IS DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE..
SIGNED BY JUDGE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 1/13/06.1/13/06 ENTERED
AND COPIES MAILED AND E−MAILED. FAXED BY CHAMBERS 1/13/06.
(afm, ) (Entered: 01/13/2006)
01/13/2006 73 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on 1/9/06 before Judge ROBRENO. Court
Reporter: JOSEPH MATKOWSKI. HEARING (jl, ) (Entered: 01/13/2006)
01/16/2006 74 MOTION for Leave to File Reply Brief in Support of Partial Opposition to the
Lifting of the Seal Established by Case Management Order 2 filed by WILLIAM
H. COSBY, JR.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Reply Brief)(O'CONNOR,
PATRICK) (Entered: 01/16/2006)
01/19/2006 75 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY
BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION
TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL THE NATIONAL INQUIRER IS
GRANTED; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF
IN RESPONSE TO NATIONAL INQUIRER'S MEMORANDUM IN
OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL THE NATIONAL
INQUIRER IS GRANTED; DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE
REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PARTIAL OPPOSITION TO THE LIFTING
OF THE SEAL IS GRANTED IN PART, DENIED IN PART AS MOOT..
SIGNED BY JUDGE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 1/18/06.1/19/06 ENTERED
AND COPIES MAILED AND E−MAILED. (afm, ) (Entered: 01/19/2006)
01/31/2006 76 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL
IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, ETC. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION
TO COMPEL THE NATIONAL ENQUIRER IS DENIED WITHOUT
PREJUDICE. SIGNED BY JUDGE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 01/31/06.
(Attachments: # 1 Order)01/31/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND
E−MAILED. (ac, ) (Entered: 01/31/2006)
02/28/2006 77 MOTION to Consolidate Cases Motion of Plaintiff Andrea Constand To
Consolidate along with Memorandum Of Law In Support Of Plaintiff's Motion to
Consolidate filed by ANDREA CONSTAND.Memorandum and Certificate of
Service. (Attachments: # 1)(TROIANI, DOLORES) (Entered: 02/28/2006)
03/14/2006 78 RESPONSE to Motion re 77 MOTION to Consolidate Cases Motion of Plaintiff
Andrea Constand To Consolidate along with Memorandum Of Law In Support Of
Plaintiff's Motion to Consolidate filed by WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR.
(O'CONNOR, PATRICK) (Entered: 03/14/2006)
Case: 2:05-cv-01099 As of: 12/04/2014 03:21 PM EST 8 of 10
9. 04/12/2006 79 MOTION to Issue International Letters of Request filed by WILLIAM H. COSBY,
JR.Memorandum. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum# 2 Text of Proposed Order # 3
Exhibit A# 4 Exhibit B# 5 Exhibit C# 6 Exhibit D# 7 Exhibit E# 8 Exhibit F# 9
Exhibit G# 10 Exhibit H# 11 Exhibit I# 12 Exhibit J# 13 Exhibit K)(O'CONNOR,
PATRICK) (Entered: 04/12/2006)
04/26/2006 80 RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR THE ISSUANCE OF
INTERNATIONAL LETTERS OF REQUEST filed by ANDREA CONSTAND,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. (afm, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 5/1/2006
(afm, ). (Entered: 04/26/2006)
05/02/2006 81 MOTION for Leave to File Reply Brief in Support of His Motion for the Issuance
of International Letters of Request filed by WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR.Brief.
(Attachments: # 1 Reply Brief)(O'CONNOR, PATRICK) (Entered: 05/02/2006)
05/15/2006 82 ORDER THAT A HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS,
TO CONSOLIDATE AND DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS TO STRIKE AND FOR
INTERNATIONAL LETTER OF REQUEST WILL BE HELD ON 6/9/2006 AT
09:00 AM IN COURTROOM 11A.. SIGNED BY JUDGE EDUARDO C.
ROBRENO ON 5/15/06. 5/16/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND
E−MAILED.(afm, ) (Entered: 05/16/2006)
05/22/2006 83 MOTION TO COMPEL SPECIFIC RESPONSES AND TO STRIKE
OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES
FILED BY ANDREA CONSTAND,CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE..(afm, ) (as, ).
(Entered: 05/23/2006)
05/24/2006 84 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL SPECIFIC RESPONSES
SHALL BE ADDRESSED AT THE HEARING ON 6/9/06; DEFENDANT
SHALL FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION COMPEL BY 6/7/06..
SIGNED BY JUDGE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 5/24/06. 5/24/06 ENTERED
AND COPIES MAILED AND E−MAILED.(afm, ) (Entered: 05/24/2006)
05/24/2006 85 MOTION TO COMPEL SPECIFIC RESPONSES AND TO STRIKE
OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES
FILED BY ANDREA CONSTAND,CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.(afm, )
(Entered: 05/24/2006)
06/06/2006 86 ORDER THAT THE REQUEST TO CONTINUE MOTION HEARING IS
DENIED; HEARING WILL BEGIN AT 8:30 A.M.. SIGNED BY JUDGE
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 6/5/06. 6/6/06 ENTERED AND COPIES
MAILED. FAXED BY CHAMBERS 6/5/06(afm, ) (as, ). (Entered: 06/06/2006)
06/07/2006 87 RESPONSE in Opposition re 83 MOTION to Compel, 85 MOTION to Compel
Specific Responses and to Strike Objections to Plaintiff's Second Set of
Interrogatories filed by WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A
and B)(O'CONNOR, PATRICK) (Entered: 06/07/2006)
06/08/2006 88 NOTICE of Appearance by ANN C. LEBOWITZ on behalf of ANDREA
CONSTAND with Certificate of Service (LEBOWITZ, ANN) (Entered:
06/08/2006)
06/09/2006 89 ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS IS DENIED AS
MOOT; DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE IS DENIED AS MOOT;
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE IS DENIED AS MOOT, ETC....
SIGNED BY JUDGE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 6/9/06.6/9/06 ENTERED
AND COPIES MAILED AND E−MAILED. (afm, ) (Entered: 06/09/2006)
06/20/2006 90 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by NATIONAL
INQUIRER.Certificate of Service.(JORDAN, JENNIFER) (Entered: 06/20/2006)
06/21/2006 91 STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT NATIONAL ENQUIRER'S MOTION FOR
AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN ANSWER IS GRANTED. THE
NATIONAL ENQUIRER SHALL HAVE UNTIL 7/7/06 TO FILE AN ANSWER
TO THE COMPLAINT. SIGNED BY JUDGE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON
6/20/06. 6/21/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED.(fdc) (as, ). (Entered:
06/21/2006)
Case: 2:05-cv-01099 As of: 12/04/2014 03:21 PM EST 9 of 10
10. 06/23/2006 92 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand and Certificate of Service (Complaint
filed in Civil Action No. 06−483 and consolidated for pretrial purposes with Civil
Action 05−1099) by MARTIN D. SINGER.(GELLMAN, NANCY) (Entered:
06/23/2006)
07/07/2006 93 ANSWER to Complaint with Certificate of Service by NATIONAL
INQUIRER.(JORDAN, JENNIFER) (Entered: 07/07/2006)
07/13/2006 94 STIPULATION OF CONFIDENTIALITY. SIGNED BY JUDGE EDUARDO C.
ROBRENO ON 7/13/06. 7/14/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED. (jpd) (as, ).
(Entered: 07/14/2006)
07/20/2006 95 Response to National Enquirer's Affirmative Defenses by ANDREA CONSTAND.
(TROIANI, DOLORES) (Entered: 07/20/2006)
11/08/2006 96 STIPULATION AND ORDER THAT THIS CASE IS DISMISSED
WITHPREJUDICE AND WITHOUT COSTS. SIGNED BY JUDGE EDUARDO
C. ROBRENO ON 11/8/06. 11/8/06 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED AND
FAXED.(afm, ) (as, ). (Entered: 11/08/2006)
Case: 2:05-cv-01099 As of: 12/04/2014 03:21 PM EST 10 of 10