This presentation by Miguel de la Mano (Compass Lexecon) was made during a workshop on “Regulation and competition in light of digitalisation” held by the OECD in Paris on 31 January 2018. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/wrcd.
This presentation by the David Stallibrass (Fingleton Associates, UK) was made during a workshop on “Regulation and competition in light of digitalisation” held by the OECD in Paris on 31 January 2018. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/wrcd.
This presentation by the CNMC (Spanish Competition Authority) was made during a workshop on “Regulation and competition in light of digitalisation” held by the OECD in Paris on 31 January 2018. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/wrcd.
This presentation by Janos BARBERIS, Senior Research Fellow at the Asian Institute of International Financial Law, was made during the discussion “Digital disruption in financial markets” held at the 131st meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 5 June 2019. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/ddfm.
This presentation by Competition Bureau Canada was made during a workshop on “Regulation and competition in light of digitalisation” held by the OECD in Paris on 31 January 2018. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/wrcd.
This presentation by the Norwegian Competition Authority was made during a workshop on “Regulation and competition in light of digitalisation” held by the OECD in Paris on 31 January 2018. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/wrcd.
This presentation by Elisabetta Iossa. Professor of Economics at "Tor Vergata" University of Rome, was made during the discussion “Competition-for-the-market” held at the 18th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 6 December 2019. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/cmkt.
The document discusses the potential for initial coin offerings (ICOs) to become a mainstream financing mechanism for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). It notes that while ICOs allow for faster and cheaper financing than traditional options like IPOs or venture capital, they currently pose significant risks to both issuers and investors due to a lack of regulation and investor protections. For ICOs to become more viable, the document argues that greater international regulatory coordination is needed to provide clarity and safeguards, while also ensuring disclosure standards and investor education on the risks involved.
This presentation by Miguel de la Mano (Compass Lexecon) was made during a workshop on “Regulation and competition in light of digitalisation” held by the OECD in Paris on 31 January 2018. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/wrcd.
This presentation by the David Stallibrass (Fingleton Associates, UK) was made during a workshop on “Regulation and competition in light of digitalisation” held by the OECD in Paris on 31 January 2018. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/wrcd.
This presentation by the CNMC (Spanish Competition Authority) was made during a workshop on “Regulation and competition in light of digitalisation” held by the OECD in Paris on 31 January 2018. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/wrcd.
This presentation by Janos BARBERIS, Senior Research Fellow at the Asian Institute of International Financial Law, was made during the discussion “Digital disruption in financial markets” held at the 131st meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 5 June 2019. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/ddfm.
This presentation by Competition Bureau Canada was made during a workshop on “Regulation and competition in light of digitalisation” held by the OECD in Paris on 31 January 2018. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/wrcd.
This presentation by the Norwegian Competition Authority was made during a workshop on “Regulation and competition in light of digitalisation” held by the OECD in Paris on 31 January 2018. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/wrcd.
This presentation by Elisabetta Iossa. Professor of Economics at "Tor Vergata" University of Rome, was made during the discussion “Competition-for-the-market” held at the 18th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 6 December 2019. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/cmkt.
The document discusses the potential for initial coin offerings (ICOs) to become a mainstream financing mechanism for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). It notes that while ICOs allow for faster and cheaper financing than traditional options like IPOs or venture capital, they currently pose significant risks to both issuers and investors due to a lack of regulation and investor protections. For ICOs to become more viable, the document argues that greater international regulatory coordination is needed to provide clarity and safeguards, while also ensuring disclosure standards and investor education on the risks involved.
Blome - Translating supply chain finance into SME productivityOECD CFE
20-21 February 2018, Mexico City: Workshop on building business linkages that boost SME productivity. http://www.oecd.org/cfe/smes/workshop-on-building-business-linkages-that-boost-SME-productivity.htm
This presentation by Stephen DRURY, Santander UK, was made during the discussion “Digital disruption in financial markets” held at the 131st meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 5 June 2019. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/cclm.
Naim - Financing SMEs in global sustainable value chains: the role of supply ...OECD CFE
20-21 February 2018, Mexico City: Workshop on building business linkages that boost SME productivity. http://www.oecd.org/cfe/smes/workshop-on-building-business-linkages-that-boost-SME-productivity.htm
This presentation by Mark Simpson, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright, was made during the discussion “Blockchain and Competition” held at the 129th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 8 June 2018. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/2gx.
This presentation by the UK Competition and Markets Authorities was made during a workshop on “Cartel screening in the digital era” held by the OECD in Paris on 30 January 2018. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/wcsde.
This document discusses competition issues that can arise with concession contracts for markets like toll roads, ports, and public transport. It covers:
1) How concession bidding processes can be abused through exclusionary practices that disadvantage rivals or exploitative excessive pricing.
2) How merger reviews may use remedies to foster competition, such as funding rivals' bidding costs or requiring early contract terminations.
3) Risks of coordination in concession markets with few competitors and infrequent tenders.
4) Interactions between competition law and laws governing concession tendering and regulation. Proper enforcement of concession contracts is important for competition.
This presentation by Xavier VIVES, IESE School of Business, was made during the discussion “Digital disruption in financial markets” held at the 131st meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 5 June 2019. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/ddfm.
This document summarizes the Norwegian payment market and the Vipps-merger case. It describes Norway as having one of the most advanced digital payment systems, with 90% of transactions non-cash. It then outlines the main players in Norway's payment system: Vipps (mobile payment solution), BankAxept (debit card scheme), and BankID (eID solution). The merger of Vipps and BankAxept/BankID was reviewed for potential input foreclosure in mobile payment solutions. Remedies including continued third-party access to BankAxept and BankID on non-discriminatory terms for 3 years addressed these concerns.
Mattia Corbetta - Crowdinvesting in Italy: a case studyOECD CFE
20-21 February 2018, Mexico City: Workshop on building business linkages that boost SME productivity. http://www.oecd.org/cfe/smes/workshop-on-building-business-linkages-that-boost-SME-productivity.htm
Alberto Wyderka - Building business linkage that boost SME productivity: the ...OECD CFE
20-21 February 2018, Mexico City: Workshop on building business linkages that boost SME productivity. http://www.oecd.org/cfe/smes/workshop-on-building-business-linkages-that-boost-SME-productivity.htm
This presentation by the UK Competition & Markets Authority was made during a workshop on “Regulation and competition in light of digitalisation” held by the OECD in Paris on 31 January 2018. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/wrcd.
This presentation by the UK Competition and Markets Authority, was made during the discussion “Data portability, interoperability and competition” held at the 135th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 9 June 2021. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/dpic.
Paolo Casini - Digitalisation, scale-ups and access to financeOECD CFE
Digitalization is often touted as a solution to issues like productivity and job creation, but evidence is still limited. It can help reduce transaction and search costs for businesses, especially SMEs, and enable new links. However, SMEs face challenges scaling up due to skills gaps, limited visibility, and finance costs. The EU is working to support SMEs through programs like the Enterprise Europe Network and Escalar, which provides mentoring, market access support, and later stage equity financing.
This presentation by Miguel de la MANO, Executive Vice President of Compass Lexecon, was made during the discussion “Co-operation between Competition Agencies and Regulators in the Financial Sector: 10 years on from the Financial Crisis” held at the 64th meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 2 on Competition and Regulation on 4 December 2017. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/284.
This presentation by the OECD Competition Division was made during a roundtable discussion on Commitment Decisions in Antitrust Cases held at the 125th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 17 June 2014. More papers, presentations and contributions from delegations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/commitment-decisions-in-antitrust-cases.htm
Crowdfunding law and regulation - EU and national issuesPaul Massey
Introduction to crowdfunding and peeling back the layers of EU and national legislation. Challenges to Capital Markets Union and cross-border investment with a particular look at the Prospectus Directive.
This presentation by Damien GERADIN, Partner, EUCLID Law, was made during the discussion “Taxi, ride-sourcing and ride-sharing services” held at the 65th meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 2 on Competition and Regulation on 4 June 2018. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at http://oe.cd/2gs.
This document summarizes Graciela Miralles' presentation on connecting competition and public procurement policies. Effective public procurement is critical for economic development, especially in developing countries where it represents a large share of GDP. Embedding competition in procurement requires a multi-layered approach at the regulatory, institutional, and individual levels. Challenges remain in implementation, such as detecting and prosecuting bid rigging cartels due to lack of resources and deterrent sanctions. The World Bank Group supports clients through knowledge generation, targeted analysis, policy reforms, capacity building and fostering cooperation between competition and procurement authorities.
This document discusses state restraints on competition and actions competition authorities can take. It argues that state and local government restraints are a major problem and authorities should remove all unreasonable restraints, not just level the playing field. It provides examples where authorities in Lithuania and Peru can challenge anticompetitive acts of government. Cross-border restraints involving states are also a problem for regional integration. Competition authorities can advocate for law reform, empower themselves to challenge government, and collaborate across borders to identify and remove anticompetitive restraints.
This presentation by Helder Vasconcelos, Vice-Rector at Porto University, was made during the discussion “Merger Control in Dynamic Markets” held at the 18th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 6 December 2019. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/mcdym.
MiFID 2 has introduced significant changes to European financial markets through increased regulation and transparency. It aims to strengthen investor protections by reducing research costs, but may unintentionally lead to consolidation. Compliance will be challenging for many firms and smaller managers may struggle with higher costs, while larger firms can absorb costs more easily. Overall the impacts on markets, trading, and the investment management industry are broad-ranging and still unfolding.
Blome - Translating supply chain finance into SME productivityOECD CFE
20-21 February 2018, Mexico City: Workshop on building business linkages that boost SME productivity. http://www.oecd.org/cfe/smes/workshop-on-building-business-linkages-that-boost-SME-productivity.htm
This presentation by Stephen DRURY, Santander UK, was made during the discussion “Digital disruption in financial markets” held at the 131st meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 5 June 2019. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/cclm.
Naim - Financing SMEs in global sustainable value chains: the role of supply ...OECD CFE
20-21 February 2018, Mexico City: Workshop on building business linkages that boost SME productivity. http://www.oecd.org/cfe/smes/workshop-on-building-business-linkages-that-boost-SME-productivity.htm
This presentation by Mark Simpson, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright, was made during the discussion “Blockchain and Competition” held at the 129th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 8 June 2018. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/2gx.
This presentation by the UK Competition and Markets Authorities was made during a workshop on “Cartel screening in the digital era” held by the OECD in Paris on 30 January 2018. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/wcsde.
This document discusses competition issues that can arise with concession contracts for markets like toll roads, ports, and public transport. It covers:
1) How concession bidding processes can be abused through exclusionary practices that disadvantage rivals or exploitative excessive pricing.
2) How merger reviews may use remedies to foster competition, such as funding rivals' bidding costs or requiring early contract terminations.
3) Risks of coordination in concession markets with few competitors and infrequent tenders.
4) Interactions between competition law and laws governing concession tendering and regulation. Proper enforcement of concession contracts is important for competition.
This presentation by Xavier VIVES, IESE School of Business, was made during the discussion “Digital disruption in financial markets” held at the 131st meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 5 June 2019. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/ddfm.
This document summarizes the Norwegian payment market and the Vipps-merger case. It describes Norway as having one of the most advanced digital payment systems, with 90% of transactions non-cash. It then outlines the main players in Norway's payment system: Vipps (mobile payment solution), BankAxept (debit card scheme), and BankID (eID solution). The merger of Vipps and BankAxept/BankID was reviewed for potential input foreclosure in mobile payment solutions. Remedies including continued third-party access to BankAxept and BankID on non-discriminatory terms for 3 years addressed these concerns.
Mattia Corbetta - Crowdinvesting in Italy: a case studyOECD CFE
20-21 February 2018, Mexico City: Workshop on building business linkages that boost SME productivity. http://www.oecd.org/cfe/smes/workshop-on-building-business-linkages-that-boost-SME-productivity.htm
Alberto Wyderka - Building business linkage that boost SME productivity: the ...OECD CFE
20-21 February 2018, Mexico City: Workshop on building business linkages that boost SME productivity. http://www.oecd.org/cfe/smes/workshop-on-building-business-linkages-that-boost-SME-productivity.htm
This presentation by the UK Competition & Markets Authority was made during a workshop on “Regulation and competition in light of digitalisation” held by the OECD in Paris on 31 January 2018. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/wrcd.
This presentation by the UK Competition and Markets Authority, was made during the discussion “Data portability, interoperability and competition” held at the 135th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 9 June 2021. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/dpic.
Paolo Casini - Digitalisation, scale-ups and access to financeOECD CFE
Digitalization is often touted as a solution to issues like productivity and job creation, but evidence is still limited. It can help reduce transaction and search costs for businesses, especially SMEs, and enable new links. However, SMEs face challenges scaling up due to skills gaps, limited visibility, and finance costs. The EU is working to support SMEs through programs like the Enterprise Europe Network and Escalar, which provides mentoring, market access support, and later stage equity financing.
This presentation by Miguel de la MANO, Executive Vice President of Compass Lexecon, was made during the discussion “Co-operation between Competition Agencies and Regulators in the Financial Sector: 10 years on from the Financial Crisis” held at the 64th meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 2 on Competition and Regulation on 4 December 2017. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/284.
This presentation by the OECD Competition Division was made during a roundtable discussion on Commitment Decisions in Antitrust Cases held at the 125th meeting of the OECD Competition Committee on 17 June 2014. More papers, presentations and contributions from delegations on the topic can be found out at www.oecd.org/daf/competition/commitment-decisions-in-antitrust-cases.htm
Crowdfunding law and regulation - EU and national issuesPaul Massey
Introduction to crowdfunding and peeling back the layers of EU and national legislation. Challenges to Capital Markets Union and cross-border investment with a particular look at the Prospectus Directive.
This presentation by Damien GERADIN, Partner, EUCLID Law, was made during the discussion “Taxi, ride-sourcing and ride-sharing services” held at the 65th meeting of the OECD Working Party No. 2 on Competition and Regulation on 4 June 2018. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at http://oe.cd/2gs.
This document summarizes Graciela Miralles' presentation on connecting competition and public procurement policies. Effective public procurement is critical for economic development, especially in developing countries where it represents a large share of GDP. Embedding competition in procurement requires a multi-layered approach at the regulatory, institutional, and individual levels. Challenges remain in implementation, such as detecting and prosecuting bid rigging cartels due to lack of resources and deterrent sanctions. The World Bank Group supports clients through knowledge generation, targeted analysis, policy reforms, capacity building and fostering cooperation between competition and procurement authorities.
This document discusses state restraints on competition and actions competition authorities can take. It argues that state and local government restraints are a major problem and authorities should remove all unreasonable restraints, not just level the playing field. It provides examples where authorities in Lithuania and Peru can challenge anticompetitive acts of government. Cross-border restraints involving states are also a problem for regional integration. Competition authorities can advocate for law reform, empower themselves to challenge government, and collaborate across borders to identify and remove anticompetitive restraints.
This presentation by Helder Vasconcelos, Vice-Rector at Porto University, was made during the discussion “Merger Control in Dynamic Markets” held at the 18th meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition on 6 December 2019. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found at oe.cd/mcdym.
MiFID 2 has introduced significant changes to European financial markets through increased regulation and transparency. It aims to strengthen investor protections by reducing research costs, but may unintentionally lead to consolidation. Compliance will be challenging for many firms and smaller managers may struggle with higher costs, while larger firms can absorb costs more easily. Overall the impacts on markets, trading, and the investment management industry are broad-ranging and still unfolding.
A Review of Competition Policy for the Digital Era (Cremer et al Report)Nicolas Petit
This slide presentation reviews the much awaited 2019 report "Competition Policy for the Digital Era" written by Jacques Crémer, Yves de Montjoye and Heike Schweitzer. The report sets out a rich list of options for future EU competition policy in the digital sector. Given the close involvement of DG COMP in the fact finding process, it is likely that the report will make impact in decision making circles. This presentation critically reviews the main suggestions of the report, and tries to identify those items that are most likely to inform future EU competition policy evolutions.
The document discusses the rise of electronic platforms in global fund distribution. Some key points:
- Electronic platforms are becoming an important distribution channel as regulations change compensation models and investors demand lower fees and more transparency.
- Regulators are reforming compensation to ban commissions and require fees to be paid directly by clients, pushing the industry toward fee-based advisory models and platform distribution.
- Platform distribution is growing, led by insurance and advisor channels, but new technologies mean platforms can support different asset classes and a range of distribution models.
- Major changes in distribution will squeeze costs and margins, potentially challenging smaller asset managers, but larger firms that enhance their digital capabilities and customer experience may withstand the pressure.
This document discusses telecommunications liberalization and issues related to effective regulation. It argues that effective regulation, as measured by indices like the OECD Regulatory Index and ECTA Scorecard, is correlated with higher levels of investment in countries. Countries with the most competitive telecom markets and effective regulation, like the UK, Netherlands, and Japan, have seen more investment in next-generation broadband and fiber networks by incumbent operators responding to competitive pressure. The document outlines characteristics of effective regulation and provides examples of both good and bad regulatory practices. It stresses that access to bottlenecks like local loops is important for competition and that countries should apply regulatory frameworks properly to encourage investment in telecommunications.
FinTech Northern Breakfast Club 23 June 2016Rob Cooper
Presentations from the FinTech Northern Breakfast Club on 23 June 2016. Meeting held the last Thursday of every month. Book at http://www.scottrobert.co.uk/events/list/
New Courses for New Horses: Alternative Approach for an OTT-based Broadband E...Toshiya Jitsuzumi
The document proposes a new policy approach for regulating the increasing dominance of over-the-top (OTT) services in broadband ecosystems. It suggests focusing primarily on the consumer side through co-regulation to address issues like neutrality, anti-competitive behaviors, and level playing fields. The approach advocates being unobtrusive and case-by-case due to lack of policy experience and rapidly changing OTT models, prioritizing smooth ecosystem development over regulatory perfection.
Axon Advisory is an international advisory and investment firm founded in 2006 that provides strategy and operations consulting and public policy/regulation consulting to ICT operators, regulators, and international organizations. It has 5 local offices and over 50 consultants with experience in the TMT sector. Some example projects Axon has worked on include assisting the European Commission to set international roaming charges in Europe, reviewing the regulatory financial reports of Spanish telecom operators, studying financing options for the 5G ecosystem in Europe, developing Mexico's digital agenda and regulatory roadmap, and developing an IoT strategy for a Middle Eastern operator. Axon looks for entry-level consultants with engineering, business, or economics degrees and 0-4 years of experience for advisory projects in
FinTech & InsureTech - Blockchain: Company presentation by Ulyana Shtybel, Co-Founder of HighCastle at the NOAH Conference London 2019, 30-31 October, Old Billingsgate.
Deloitte - Incentive regulation to promote investments in new networksEric Delannoy
The current and future traffic growth will push telecom operators to important investments in new networks. In this context, regulators have several tools to promote investments in LTE, 5G and fiber. These slides were presented by Deloitte Economic Advisory during the 2018 INT Tunisia international conference.
IMF Fintech report - cross board paymentClement Hsieh
The PPT content comes from IMF "Fintech and Financial Services - Initial Considerations" report. It gives clear overview to cross board payment, so it is used in our graduate Fintech course as case study.
This document discusses RegTech and the regulatory landscape for digital finance. It defines RegTech as technologies that help financial institutions meet regulatory requirements more efficiently. RegTech applications include regulatory compliance, risk management, financial crime prevention, and know-your-customer processes. The document also examines the EU's Payment Services Directive 2 (PSD2), which aims to increase competition by regulating new market players like account information and payment initiation service providers. PSD2 establishes rules for bank data access and sharing liability for fraudulent transactions.
Blockchain implementation strategy focuses on getting involved in multiple aspects of the blockchain ecosystem through a portfolio approach. This includes developing DApps initially for portfolio diversification and lower risk, while also getting involved in building protocols and platforms to gain technical expertise and governance relevance over time. A joint cooperation strategy is proposed to develop the portfolio systematically and increase the success of projects through contributions at the DApp level, while allowing time for the team to build capabilities in protocols and platforms.
FinTech Regulatory Landscape by Trystan Tether and Gabor Helembai 25 10 2016bhalasz
This document compares the FinTech regulatory regimes in the UK and Hungary. It provides examples of FinTech projects like crowdfunding, payment services, and data analytics. The UK regulator (FCA) takes an approach that favors innovation while ensuring consumer protection. The FCA provides guidance and consults with firms but regulatory burden is high. Hungary has no FinTech regulation yet but specific rules may be introduced. Key issues being addressed include PSD2 implementation and developing instant payments. New technologies like bitcoin raise questions about appropriate regulation.
The future of the OTC Derivative Market - Eugene stanfieldLászló Árvai
The document discusses the impact of mandatory central clearing of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives on costs and the derivatives market. Central clearing of OTC derivatives has increased costs for market participants due to higher capital charges, margin requirements, and collateral costs. It has also led to a shift toward clearing standardized products and away from bespoke hedges. Firms are focused on optimizing their collateral and improving collateral management processes to help offset these increased costs. Regulations continue to evolve in ways that will further shape the OTC derivatives market.
Desde 2008, o Reino Unido tem se posicionado como um dos líderes globais no setor de Fintech. Estima-se que em 2015 o setor atraiu 524 milhões de libras em investimentos e lucros de 6,6 bilhoes de libras. Esta apresentação mostra a expertise do Reino Unido e como o Governo Brditânico está desenvolvendo novas oportunidades, incluindo um ambiente regulatório favorável às Fintechs.
- TIM reported results for 1Q18 with continued growth in key metrics
- Net service revenues grew 3.5% YoY to R$3.7 billion driven by expansion in mobile and fixed broadband services
- EBITDA - Capex increased 38.9% YoY to R$0.8 billion as a result of improved profitability and operating leverage
- Mobile postpaid customer base grew with 3 million net adds over the last 12 months, while fixed broadband added 88k customers
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
The Art and Science of Cryptoforensic Investigation: Best Practices and Tools
Digital economy-legal-updates-webinar-co-investment-in-new-infrastructure-roll-out
1. Digital Economy Legal Updates
Webinar Series
Co-Investment in New Infrastructure Roll-Out
Presented by Luigi Minerva, Felipe Florez
Duncan & Francesco Liberatore
19 June 2017
8. 8squirepattonboggs.comsquirepattonboggs.com
Economic rationale for co-investment
• Rolling out full fibre networks is costly…
• FTTH Council estimate: €137bn across EU28 for 100% coverage
• … and carries significant risks
• Demand uncertainty; cost/ deployment risks; regulatory uncertainty
• Co-investment solves some of the problems (demand & cost)
• “a problem shared is a problem halved”
• European Commission is now proposing changes to the regulatory regime
• proposed Article 74 in the Electronic Communications Code: co-investment
initiatives will be exempt from regulation if they satisfy certain criteria: they invest
in very high capacity networks; have open, transparent and non-discriminatory
terms of participation; offer old generation access to non-investors
10. 10squirepattonboggs.comsquirepattonboggs.com
Many different business models can be used to
rollout ultrafast fibre networks
CityFibre’s ‘anchor tenant’
model
Oxera’s co-investment
‘NetCo’ model
Participating
service providers
OAOs
End-customers
NetCo
Ownership structure
evolving over time
P
A
P
End-customers
Anchor tenants/Service providers
Vehicle holding fibre assets
Participating investors
P
- structurally separate, independent
ownership model, open access
- anchor tenants obtain favourable
conditions and limit demand risk
- similar characteristics to NetCo, but
addresses underinvestment through
private investment and contracting
- commercial network entity owned by
operators and other investors,
supplying mainly passive access
- addresses underinvestment by avoiding
duplication and long-term regulatory
stability, achieving commitment through
ownership stakes
Investment supported by long-term
contracts with anchor tenants
sales of passive
or active access
sales of retail
services
wholesale/retail
payment
investment
dividend
After five
years
11. 11squirepattonboggs.comsquirepattonboggs.com
BEREC strongly against current proposals
BEREC’s preferred option:
Delete Article 74
Alternative option:
Water down Article 74
• Co-investment already takes place
commercially
• Regulators already take account of such
networks in their market analyses
• No need to explicitly encourage it in the Code
• Current rules already allow regulators to
reflect risk of investments
• Criteria for regulatory forbearance too weak
• Scope for tactical gaming by operators could
reinforce market power
• Regulators empowered (not compelled) to
forebear
• Greater clarity on “new network elements”
• Co-investors must be ‘real’ competitors in
retail market
• Co-investment offer must be taken up (not
just made available)
• Non-investors should also benefit from
access to new network elements
12. 12squirepattonboggs.comsquirepattonboggs.com
What does the future hold for the co-investment
regulatory proposals?
• Whether Article 74 survives discussions in Parliament or not, expect
many more discussions on these models across Europe
• for example, in the UK, Ofcom has given strong signals that they expect to see a
legally separate Openreach more open to discuss and pursue co-investment
initiatives with willing investors
• could this lead to a relaxation of (price) regulation on Openreach?
• How will competition authorities react?
• first, there was outright consolidation (M&A)
• then, there was network sharing (live case at the Commission being investigated)
• will be co-investment models be next in the firing line?
15. 15squirepattonboggs.comsquirepattonboggs.com
Market Definition
Wholesale
Market
Fixed wholesale broadband access
Separate market for new ultra-fast fibre technology?
Retail
Market
Fixed broadband services
Fixed-mobile substitution?
Geographic
Market
National
Separate regional markets at wholesale level?
Additional
Guidance
SMP Guidelines and Recommendation on Relevant Markets
BEREC Position Papers and Precedents
19. 19squirepattonboggs.comsquirepattonboggs.com
Case Study: Italy (cont.)
Market shares
• Wholesale level
• TI: 96% (volume) and 87% (value);
• Others: 4% (volume) and 10% (value)
• Retail level
• TI: 40%; Fastweb: 27%
Competition concerns
• Direct Limitation of Competition between the Parties, Coordination
and Input Foreclosure
• Exclusivity, long duration;
• IRU (30 years) on Fastweb’s network and Passive access to TI’s
network
• Spill over effects
• Price coordination at retail level;
• Reduction of competition on quality
High Market
Shares
High
Proportion of
Variable
Costs in
Common
20. 20squirepattonboggs.comsquirepattonboggs.com
Conclusion
Specific block exemption and guidelines ?
Full function joint venture may provide more legal certainty, but in practice
limited application so far
Competition law assessment is needed from the outset and at regular
intervals
Incentive for co-investment under sector-specific regulation must be
reconciled with the need to comply with competition law