SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Stakeholders' Dialogue on
Government Approaches to
Managing Defecting Violent Extremists
POLICY BRIEF
Centre for
Democracy and
Development
The Federal government of Nigeria, through the
Defence Headquarters inaugurated Operation Safe
Corridor (OSC) in 2015. The programme's aim is to
rehabilitate repentant Boko Haram militants and
reintegrate them back into their respective
communities as productive law-abiding citizens. The
defecting members will acquire vocation training,
access de-radicalisation and civics program to become
useful members of their society upon release from the
program. Since OSC's commencement in May 2016,
many have expressed strong reservation and criticism
againsttheprogramme.
The criticisms and reservations are premised on the
opacity of key issues such as the modalities for the
implementation of the programme, sundry issues such
as where defecting Boko Haram members will be
reintegrated, and frustrations of the Internally
Displaced Persons (IDPs) and other victims affected by
the Boko Haram insurgency. Until these criticisms are
addressed, OSC is unlikely to be supported by the
population and will ultimately be difficult to
implementintheNortheast.
In the interest of peace, reconciliation and stability in
the Northeast, the Centre for Democracy and
Development (CDD) convened a stakeholders'
dialogue on the Boko Haram insurgency and OSC. The
dialogue brought together government
representatives, traditional and religious leaders,
women's and youth groups, the Civilian Joint Task
Force (CJTF), media, academia, selected civil society
organisations at national and state level, Office of the
National Security Adviser (ONSA), the National
Orientation Agency, Operation Lafia Dole, and
members of Presidential Committee on Operation Safe
Corridor, among others. The objective of the dialogue
istocreateanenablingenvironmentforOperationSafe
Corridor Committee and community Stakeholders in
Borno to discuss and interrogate rehabilitation and
reintegration of repentant violent extremists in the
th
northeast. The meeting was held on Tuesday 12 July
2016inMaiduguri,BornoState.
This policy brief outlines contributions from
stakeholders and demonstrates how dialogue can help
foster community understanding of government
intervention on reintegration, foster citizenship
ownership of government programmes and its many
solutions, improve OSC's credibility and assist the
government in creating conditions that will reduce
Nigeria'ssusceptibilitytofutureviolentextremism.
The following recommendations and opinions were
putforwardbyparticipantsatthemeeting:
• Operation Safe Corridor is a vital component of
the Nigerian government's strategy for countering
violent extremism and is equally important for
achieving sustainable peace and normalcy for citizens
inNortheastNigeria.
• The meeting provided an avenue to develop a
better understanding of Operation Safe Corridor and
offered practical advice on how to improve the
programmeandmakeitworkatthecommunitylevel.
• While applauding the OSC, participants were
unanimous in their objection to the reintegration of
defecting Boko Haram fighters in the near term. They
called for a ten-year window before defecting
members can be reintegrated into local communities.
They argue that this ten-year window is premised on
the need to allow time for the local populace to heal
aftertheseven-yearinsurgency.
• The government should immediately commence
rehabilitation initiatives that address local grievances
before the rehabilitation or reintegration of defecting
BokoHaramfightersisbegun.
• At no time should the implementation of the OSC
programme affect the welfare of internally displaced
persons (IDPs). They argued that OSC should never be
implemented at the detriment of those who have
beenaffectedbyviolentextremistactivities.
• The design and implementation of any
rehabilitation, reconstruction and reintegration efforts
must be inclusive. Relevant actors identified include
civil society organisations, religious clerics, traditional
institutionsandvictims.
• The dialogue observed that some members of the
public who have been affected by the violence in the
Northeast have become radicalised against Boko
Haram in its entirety. Government therefore need
more community engagement and broad sensitisation
through media platforms and traditional and religious
structures to de-radicalise such people for effective
reintegrationofrepentantviolentextremists.
Thedialogueidentifiedsomeoftheinitial,andongoing,
causes of violent extremism in the Northeast to
include:
• poor leadership and absence of good
governance;
• corruption;
• poverty;
• socio-economicchallenges;
• initial infiltration of security institutions by
militants;
• rivalriesbetweensecurityagencies;
• politicisation and relegation of traditional
institutions.
• lack of involvement of relevant scholars and
religious leaders at the beginning of the
hostilities;
• poor communication between the
governmentandcommunities;
• poor parental guidance, specifically amongst
boys;
• unregulatedpreaching;
• high-handedness of security institutions and
breakdowninthesocialfabric.
Key Issues from the Meeting Causes of Violent Extremism
The stakeholders' dialogue suggested the following as
pathways the OSC could adopt for effective
rehabilitation and reintegration of defecting violent
extremists in Northeast Nigeria. These pathways
include:
• The roadmap for the reintegration of defecting
Boko Haram fighters must be inclusive of all
relevant stakeholders, vis government,
military, NGOs and religious and traditional
institutions. This is premised on the
recognition that violent extremism cannot be
defeated solely by military force. The
involvement of the above named stakeholders
is crucial for all-inclusive engagement that will
eventually culminate in the communities'
acceptance to live and work with repentant
andreintegratedpeople.
• The roadmap must emphasise building
community cohesion and resilience, with a
particular focus on strengthening the role of
traditional institutions in the affected
communities.
• An effective early warning and communication
system should be put in place. Participants
emphasised the importance of having an
effective communication and coordination
network between communities, government
andsecurityagencies.
• Theimportanceofaccountabilityforallparties
in the insurgency was also emphasised. It was
unanimous amongst participants that unless
all perpetrators are brought to account, it will
be difficult for communities to accept the
rehabilitated Boko Haram extremists.
Stakeholders advised OSC to utilise counter
narratives to violent extremism in the process
of de-radicalisation and rehabilitation of
violent extremists. Relevant stakeholders such
as the Ulamas (religious teachers and
preachers) and formal education institutions
should be involved in the deradicalisation and
rehabilitationprocess.
• Any programme that addresses rehabilitation
andreintegrationshouldbeimplemented
simultaneously with programmes addressing
poverty, the plight of IDPs and malnutrition in
theNortheast.
Any attempt to reintegrate repentant Boko Haram
fighters back into communities that remain negatively
affected by Boko Haram's violence will be met with
staunch resistance and may lead to subsequent
violence. Particularcaremustbetakenonthisissue.
The dialogue made the following recommendations
about the role of various stakeholders in OSC
including the government, security agencies,
religiousandtraditionalinstitutions.
• Ensure effective education and public
awareness about OSC, particularly at the community
level. OSC will succeed only if communities are willing
to support it and assist in the reintegration of former
Boko Haram fighters. The following were identified as
immediate concerns from communities in the
Northeast:
a. Where are the rehabilitation
programmes/facilities going to be located?
b. What is the specific process of rehabilitating
a repentant Boko Haram fighter?
c. What safeguards are the government taking
to ensure that those released back into the
society do not revert to violent extremism.
Where will the rehabilitated Boko Haram
fighters be relocated?
d. How will the government ensure criminal
opportunists from neighbouring countries do
not abuse Operation Safe Corridor?
e. Many opine that the 12-week timeline
established for rehabilitation is too short.
• Operation Safe Corridor should be carried out in
phases.
• Participants identified the radio, television, social
media platforms are the most effective
communication tools for awareness about
reintegration.
TheGovernment:
Propositions for Implementing Operation Safe Corridor
• Government was advised to provide economic
empowerment and rehabilitation programmes for
both rehabilitated ex-violent extremists and people
in communities that are affected by Boko Haram
activities,andwherereintegrationwilltakeplace.
• Ensure continuous dialogue and coordination
amongst all stakeholders. Operation Safe Corridor
will only work if everyone involved maintains
communication and is able to adjust the programme
to fit the individual needs of each surrendered
militant and community members who will assist in
the reintegration process. A 'one-size-fits-all'
approachwillnotworkwithregardtoOSC.
• Stakeholders think that rehabilitated violent
extremists will only be accepted back into the
communities where they come from, as other parts
of the country will not accept them. Even so, they
also encouraged government to take advantage of
OSC to improve national peace education and carry
out re-orientation programmes nationwide that
wouldmakepeoplemoreinterestedinthepursuitof
peace.
• Use traditional and social media to counter violent
extremist narratives and educate the population on
the necessity and importance of OSC for political
stability, human and national development
andsecurity and peace in the Northeast in particular
andNigeriaingeneral.
• Encourage community members to participate in
the full reintegration process for community
legitimacy, acceptance and ownership. Government
should ensure inclusive governance that provides all
communitymemberswithavoice.
• Government should carry out broad sensitisation
that targets every possible means of reaching
everyone in the Northeast. Sensitisation should
address peaceful coexistence and the mutual
benefit of reintegrating rehabilitated violent
extremists.
• Strengthen independent traditional institutions in
the Northeast so that they are able to provide
community cohesion, sensitisation and education
for the acceptance of rehabilitated repentant
violentextremistsinaffectedcommunities.
• The rehabilitation programme must be employed
simultaneously with efforts to address the many
grievances the public have against Boko Haram as a
result of their violent destruction of lives and
propertyintheNortheastandbeyond.
• Build inter-agency synergy and coordination
amongst all security organisations for effective
community intelligence that will aid reintegration
plansandstrategy.
• Ensure adequate intelligence gathering and sharing
that authorities can use to inform decisions in the
holisticimplementationofOSCintheNortheast.
• Improve the capacity of all security agencies to
address violent extremist threats that might hamper
the efforts of government through OSC to
rehabilitate, empower and reintegrated repentant
violentextremists.
• Ensure fair and equitable justice for all Nigerians as a
way of building confidence and trust in government
andOSC
• Provide timely and lawful dispensation of justice for
those who violate the law as a measure for instilling
law and order in the Northeast and for the safe
returnofrepentantviolentextremists.
• Ensure non-interference in the affairs of traditional
institutions for their independent role in the
reintegration of rehabilitated repentant violent
extremists.
• Stay clear of politicising the OSC mandate and tasks
forgenuineimplementationandachievementofthe
setgoals.
• In collaboration with government, restore
traditional conflict resolution mechanisms to serve
as preventive measures against future violent
extremism and for reconciling societal objection to
the reintegration of repentant Boko Haram
extremists.
Securityagencies:
TheJudiciary:
Politicians:
TraditionalInstitutions:
ReligiousInstitutions:
Conclusion
• Religious leaders should be at the centre of
sensitising and de-radicalising members of the
publicintheNortheast.
• Religious leaders and scholars should take the
lead in developing counter narratives to
violent extremism and partner with OSC to de-
radicalisesurrenderingviolentextremists.
The dialogue presented an opportunity for
stakeholders at the community level to interact with
government on approaches to OSC and the
deradicalisationandrehabilitationofBokoHaram
insurgents. This resulted in a critical interaction
between community-level stakeholders and
government representatives at state and federal level
and provided an opportunity for the development of
sound approaches to reintegration and resettlement
through OSC. The causes and effects of the conflict in
theNortheastwerediscussedindetail.
More importantly, the dialogue produced tangible
ideas and strategies for a holistic approach to ending
the conflict and ways to suppress future violent
extremist organisations from emerging. Stakeholders
who attended the meeting also developed a better
understanding of Operation Safe Corridor and offered
practical advice on how to improve the programme
andmakeitworkatthecommunitylevel.

More Related Content

What's hot

NHWEP Report 2015
NHWEP Report 2015NHWEP Report 2015
NHWEP Report 2015
Kylie Barton
 
Why advocacymatters
Why advocacymattersWhy advocacymatters
Why advocacymatters
clac.cab
 
Mod 5 Actions For Human Rights
Mod 5   Actions For Human RightsMod 5   Actions For Human Rights
Mod 5 Actions For Human Rights
community.equitas
 
Chapter 11: Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation and Resources
Chapter 11: Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation and ResourcesChapter 11: Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation and Resources
Chapter 11: Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation and Resources
Presidential Human Rights Committee - Secretariat
 
The needs and rights of male sex workers
The needs and rights of male sex workersThe needs and rights of male sex workers
The needs and rights of male sex workers
clac.cab
 
Final draft sa_forum_khan_younis_13_10_2013
Final draft sa_forum_khan_younis_13_10_2013Final draft sa_forum_khan_younis_13_10_2013
Final draft sa_forum_khan_younis_13_10_2013
Yaghi123
 
32nd board meeting communities delegation country dialogue position paper
32nd board meeting communities delegation country dialogue position paper32nd board meeting communities delegation country dialogue position paper
32nd board meeting communities delegation country dialogue position paper
clac.cab
 
Community update 2014
Community update 2014Community update 2014
Community update 2014
clac.cab
 
Voluntary Sector Management
Voluntary Sector  ManagementVoluntary Sector  Management
Voluntary Sector Management
Jo Balucanag - Bitonio
 
National approaches to public participation in strengthening crime prevention...
National approaches to public participation in strengthening crime prevention...National approaches to public participation in strengthening crime prevention...
National approaches to public participation in strengthening crime prevention...
Dr Lendy Spires
 
Engagement of key populations in the funding model report
Engagement of key populations in the funding model reportEngagement of key populations in the funding model report
Engagement of key populations in the funding model report
clac.cab
 
NED Annual Report 2012 Highlight Spreads
NED Annual Report 2012 Highlight SpreadsNED Annual Report 2012 Highlight Spreads
NED Annual Report 2012 Highlight Spreads
Jean Schindler
 
Punishing success ?
Punishing success ?Punishing success ?
Punishing success ?
clac.cab
 
Local Government
Local GovernmentLocal Government
Local Government
Jo Balucanag - Bitonio
 
Profile of CSCSD
Profile of CSCSD Profile of CSCSD
Profile of CSCSD
Mabel Tola-Winjobi
 
The significance and limits of ngos in human rights protection in nigeria
The significance and limits of ngos in human rights protection in nigeriaThe significance and limits of ngos in human rights protection in nigeria
The significance and limits of ngos in human rights protection in nigeria
Alexander Decker
 
Ra 9418
Ra 9418Ra 9418
Ra 9418
srjojofma
 
Hrba study presentation by fresno
Hrba study presentation by fresnoHrba study presentation by fresno
Hrba study presentation by fresno
Olena Ursu
 

What's hot (18)

NHWEP Report 2015
NHWEP Report 2015NHWEP Report 2015
NHWEP Report 2015
 
Why advocacymatters
Why advocacymattersWhy advocacymatters
Why advocacymatters
 
Mod 5 Actions For Human Rights
Mod 5   Actions For Human RightsMod 5   Actions For Human Rights
Mod 5 Actions For Human Rights
 
Chapter 11: Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation and Resources
Chapter 11: Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation and ResourcesChapter 11: Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation and Resources
Chapter 11: Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation and Resources
 
The needs and rights of male sex workers
The needs and rights of male sex workersThe needs and rights of male sex workers
The needs and rights of male sex workers
 
Final draft sa_forum_khan_younis_13_10_2013
Final draft sa_forum_khan_younis_13_10_2013Final draft sa_forum_khan_younis_13_10_2013
Final draft sa_forum_khan_younis_13_10_2013
 
32nd board meeting communities delegation country dialogue position paper
32nd board meeting communities delegation country dialogue position paper32nd board meeting communities delegation country dialogue position paper
32nd board meeting communities delegation country dialogue position paper
 
Community update 2014
Community update 2014Community update 2014
Community update 2014
 
Voluntary Sector Management
Voluntary Sector  ManagementVoluntary Sector  Management
Voluntary Sector Management
 
National approaches to public participation in strengthening crime prevention...
National approaches to public participation in strengthening crime prevention...National approaches to public participation in strengthening crime prevention...
National approaches to public participation in strengthening crime prevention...
 
Engagement of key populations in the funding model report
Engagement of key populations in the funding model reportEngagement of key populations in the funding model report
Engagement of key populations in the funding model report
 
NED Annual Report 2012 Highlight Spreads
NED Annual Report 2012 Highlight SpreadsNED Annual Report 2012 Highlight Spreads
NED Annual Report 2012 Highlight Spreads
 
Punishing success ?
Punishing success ?Punishing success ?
Punishing success ?
 
Local Government
Local GovernmentLocal Government
Local Government
 
Profile of CSCSD
Profile of CSCSD Profile of CSCSD
Profile of CSCSD
 
The significance and limits of ngos in human rights protection in nigeria
The significance and limits of ngos in human rights protection in nigeriaThe significance and limits of ngos in human rights protection in nigeria
The significance and limits of ngos in human rights protection in nigeria
 
Ra 9418
Ra 9418Ra 9418
Ra 9418
 
Hrba study presentation by fresno
Hrba study presentation by fresnoHrba study presentation by fresno
Hrba study presentation by fresno
 

Similar to Dialogue policy brief-ilovepdf-compressed

Citizen engagement project
Citizen engagement projectCitizen engagement project
Citizen engagement project
Joseph Mwania
 
mr_sathekge.ppt
mr_sathekge.pptmr_sathekge.ppt
mr_sathekge.ppt
AnaPatrciaMonteiro3
 
YOUTH 21 Declaration
YOUTH 21 DeclarationYOUTH 21 Declaration
YOUTH 21 Declaration
Sanka Chandima Abayawardena
 
Seminar report: Joint action for creating enabling environment for civil soci...
Seminar report: Joint action for creating enabling environment for civil soci...Seminar report: Joint action for creating enabling environment for civil soci...
Seminar report: Joint action for creating enabling environment for civil soci...
Sumoalaiset kehitysjärjestöt - Fingo
 
WHS Report 250615 REV01
WHS Report 250615 REV01WHS Report 250615 REV01
WHS Report 250615 REV01
Emily Naidike
 
Communication, participation, & social change
Communication, participation, & social changeCommunication, participation, & social change
Communication, participation, & social change
Dr Lendy Spires
 
337308-2022-TIP-REPORT-inaccessible.pdf
337308-2022-TIP-REPORT-inaccessible.pdf337308-2022-TIP-REPORT-inaccessible.pdf
337308-2022-TIP-REPORT-inaccessible.pdf
中 央社
 
Understanding Social Exclusion in Indonesia
Understanding Social Exclusion in IndonesiaUnderstanding Social Exclusion in Indonesia
Understanding Social Exclusion in Indonesia
Program Peduli
 
Peacebuilding from below The case of Zimbabwe
Peacebuilding from below The case of ZimbabwePeacebuilding from below The case of Zimbabwe
Peacebuilding from below The case of Zimbabwe
Sheunesu Hove
 
14Sept19_The+Hague-Marrakech+FTF+Memorandum
14Sept19_The+Hague-Marrakech+FTF+Memorandum14Sept19_The+Hague-Marrakech+FTF+Memorandum
14Sept19_The+Hague-Marrakech+FTF+Memorandum
Karen Mignano
 
Conference highlights - OECD Civil Society Days 2019
Conference highlights - OECD Civil Society Days 2019Conference highlights - OECD Civil Society Days 2019
Conference highlights - OECD Civil Society Days 2019
Development Co-operation Directorate (DCD-DAC)
 
Chair's Summary
Chair's SummaryChair's Summary
Chair's Summary
Nishanie Jayamaha
 
Participate-Work-with-us-Policy-Brief
Participate-Work-with-us-Policy-BriefParticipate-Work-with-us-Policy-Brief
Participate-Work-with-us-Policy-Brief
purent oduor
 
23953 guidance notecountrydialogueapril2014final
23953 guidance notecountrydialogueapril2014final23953 guidance notecountrydialogueapril2014final
23953 guidance notecountrydialogueapril2014final
clac.cab
 
381c64cc0ebda2b7c1257704004609c5 full-report
381c64cc0ebda2b7c1257704004609c5 full-report381c64cc0ebda2b7c1257704004609c5 full-report
381c64cc0ebda2b7c1257704004609c5 full-report
kanwalg88
 
Community Resilience Response to Boko Haram Insurgency in Yobe State
Community Resilience Response to Boko Haram Insurgency in Yobe StateCommunity Resilience Response to Boko Haram Insurgency in Yobe State
Community Resilience Response to Boko Haram Insurgency in Yobe State
ijtsrd
 
November 2015
November 2015November 2015
November 2015
Katsang Cecile
 
ANC Social Transformation Policy Document
ANC Social Transformation Policy DocumentANC Social Transformation Policy Document
ANC Social Transformation Policy Document
SABC News
 
Political Transitions After a Peace Agreement: Opportunities for the Bangsamoro
Political Transitions After a Peace Agreement: Opportunities for the BangsamoroPolitical Transitions After a Peace Agreement: Opportunities for the Bangsamoro
Political Transitions After a Peace Agreement: Opportunities for the Bangsamoro
IAGorgph
 
Fragile and Conflict-Affected States
Fragile and Conflict-Affected StatesFragile and Conflict-Affected States
Fragile and Conflict-Affected States
NonviolentConflict
 

Similar to Dialogue policy brief-ilovepdf-compressed (20)

Citizen engagement project
Citizen engagement projectCitizen engagement project
Citizen engagement project
 
mr_sathekge.ppt
mr_sathekge.pptmr_sathekge.ppt
mr_sathekge.ppt
 
YOUTH 21 Declaration
YOUTH 21 DeclarationYOUTH 21 Declaration
YOUTH 21 Declaration
 
Seminar report: Joint action for creating enabling environment for civil soci...
Seminar report: Joint action for creating enabling environment for civil soci...Seminar report: Joint action for creating enabling environment for civil soci...
Seminar report: Joint action for creating enabling environment for civil soci...
 
WHS Report 250615 REV01
WHS Report 250615 REV01WHS Report 250615 REV01
WHS Report 250615 REV01
 
Communication, participation, & social change
Communication, participation, & social changeCommunication, participation, & social change
Communication, participation, & social change
 
337308-2022-TIP-REPORT-inaccessible.pdf
337308-2022-TIP-REPORT-inaccessible.pdf337308-2022-TIP-REPORT-inaccessible.pdf
337308-2022-TIP-REPORT-inaccessible.pdf
 
Understanding Social Exclusion in Indonesia
Understanding Social Exclusion in IndonesiaUnderstanding Social Exclusion in Indonesia
Understanding Social Exclusion in Indonesia
 
Peacebuilding from below The case of Zimbabwe
Peacebuilding from below The case of ZimbabwePeacebuilding from below The case of Zimbabwe
Peacebuilding from below The case of Zimbabwe
 
14Sept19_The+Hague-Marrakech+FTF+Memorandum
14Sept19_The+Hague-Marrakech+FTF+Memorandum14Sept19_The+Hague-Marrakech+FTF+Memorandum
14Sept19_The+Hague-Marrakech+FTF+Memorandum
 
Conference highlights - OECD Civil Society Days 2019
Conference highlights - OECD Civil Society Days 2019Conference highlights - OECD Civil Society Days 2019
Conference highlights - OECD Civil Society Days 2019
 
Chair's Summary
Chair's SummaryChair's Summary
Chair's Summary
 
Participate-Work-with-us-Policy-Brief
Participate-Work-with-us-Policy-BriefParticipate-Work-with-us-Policy-Brief
Participate-Work-with-us-Policy-Brief
 
23953 guidance notecountrydialogueapril2014final
23953 guidance notecountrydialogueapril2014final23953 guidance notecountrydialogueapril2014final
23953 guidance notecountrydialogueapril2014final
 
381c64cc0ebda2b7c1257704004609c5 full-report
381c64cc0ebda2b7c1257704004609c5 full-report381c64cc0ebda2b7c1257704004609c5 full-report
381c64cc0ebda2b7c1257704004609c5 full-report
 
Community Resilience Response to Boko Haram Insurgency in Yobe State
Community Resilience Response to Boko Haram Insurgency in Yobe StateCommunity Resilience Response to Boko Haram Insurgency in Yobe State
Community Resilience Response to Boko Haram Insurgency in Yobe State
 
November 2015
November 2015November 2015
November 2015
 
ANC Social Transformation Policy Document
ANC Social Transformation Policy DocumentANC Social Transformation Policy Document
ANC Social Transformation Policy Document
 
Political Transitions After a Peace Agreement: Opportunities for the Bangsamoro
Political Transitions After a Peace Agreement: Opportunities for the BangsamoroPolitical Transitions After a Peace Agreement: Opportunities for the Bangsamoro
Political Transitions After a Peace Agreement: Opportunities for the Bangsamoro
 
Fragile and Conflict-Affected States
Fragile and Conflict-Affected StatesFragile and Conflict-Affected States
Fragile and Conflict-Affected States
 

Dialogue policy brief-ilovepdf-compressed

  • 1. Stakeholders' Dialogue on Government Approaches to Managing Defecting Violent Extremists POLICY BRIEF Centre for Democracy and Development
  • 2. The Federal government of Nigeria, through the Defence Headquarters inaugurated Operation Safe Corridor (OSC) in 2015. The programme's aim is to rehabilitate repentant Boko Haram militants and reintegrate them back into their respective communities as productive law-abiding citizens. The defecting members will acquire vocation training, access de-radicalisation and civics program to become useful members of their society upon release from the program. Since OSC's commencement in May 2016, many have expressed strong reservation and criticism againsttheprogramme. The criticisms and reservations are premised on the opacity of key issues such as the modalities for the implementation of the programme, sundry issues such as where defecting Boko Haram members will be reintegrated, and frustrations of the Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) and other victims affected by the Boko Haram insurgency. Until these criticisms are addressed, OSC is unlikely to be supported by the population and will ultimately be difficult to implementintheNortheast. In the interest of peace, reconciliation and stability in the Northeast, the Centre for Democracy and Development (CDD) convened a stakeholders' dialogue on the Boko Haram insurgency and OSC. The dialogue brought together government representatives, traditional and religious leaders, women's and youth groups, the Civilian Joint Task Force (CJTF), media, academia, selected civil society organisations at national and state level, Office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA), the National Orientation Agency, Operation Lafia Dole, and members of Presidential Committee on Operation Safe Corridor, among others. The objective of the dialogue istocreateanenablingenvironmentforOperationSafe Corridor Committee and community Stakeholders in Borno to discuss and interrogate rehabilitation and reintegration of repentant violent extremists in the th northeast. The meeting was held on Tuesday 12 July 2016inMaiduguri,BornoState. This policy brief outlines contributions from stakeholders and demonstrates how dialogue can help foster community understanding of government intervention on reintegration, foster citizenship ownership of government programmes and its many solutions, improve OSC's credibility and assist the government in creating conditions that will reduce Nigeria'ssusceptibilitytofutureviolentextremism.
  • 3. The following recommendations and opinions were putforwardbyparticipantsatthemeeting: • Operation Safe Corridor is a vital component of the Nigerian government's strategy for countering violent extremism and is equally important for achieving sustainable peace and normalcy for citizens inNortheastNigeria. • The meeting provided an avenue to develop a better understanding of Operation Safe Corridor and offered practical advice on how to improve the programmeandmakeitworkatthecommunitylevel. • While applauding the OSC, participants were unanimous in their objection to the reintegration of defecting Boko Haram fighters in the near term. They called for a ten-year window before defecting members can be reintegrated into local communities. They argue that this ten-year window is premised on the need to allow time for the local populace to heal aftertheseven-yearinsurgency. • The government should immediately commence rehabilitation initiatives that address local grievances before the rehabilitation or reintegration of defecting BokoHaramfightersisbegun. • At no time should the implementation of the OSC programme affect the welfare of internally displaced persons (IDPs). They argued that OSC should never be implemented at the detriment of those who have beenaffectedbyviolentextremistactivities. • The design and implementation of any rehabilitation, reconstruction and reintegration efforts must be inclusive. Relevant actors identified include civil society organisations, religious clerics, traditional institutionsandvictims. • The dialogue observed that some members of the public who have been affected by the violence in the Northeast have become radicalised against Boko Haram in its entirety. Government therefore need more community engagement and broad sensitisation through media platforms and traditional and religious structures to de-radicalise such people for effective reintegrationofrepentantviolentextremists. Thedialogueidentifiedsomeoftheinitial,andongoing, causes of violent extremism in the Northeast to include: • poor leadership and absence of good governance; • corruption; • poverty; • socio-economicchallenges; • initial infiltration of security institutions by militants; • rivalriesbetweensecurityagencies; • politicisation and relegation of traditional institutions. • lack of involvement of relevant scholars and religious leaders at the beginning of the hostilities; • poor communication between the governmentandcommunities; • poor parental guidance, specifically amongst boys; • unregulatedpreaching; • high-handedness of security institutions and breakdowninthesocialfabric. Key Issues from the Meeting Causes of Violent Extremism
  • 4. The stakeholders' dialogue suggested the following as pathways the OSC could adopt for effective rehabilitation and reintegration of defecting violent extremists in Northeast Nigeria. These pathways include: • The roadmap for the reintegration of defecting Boko Haram fighters must be inclusive of all relevant stakeholders, vis government, military, NGOs and religious and traditional institutions. This is premised on the recognition that violent extremism cannot be defeated solely by military force. The involvement of the above named stakeholders is crucial for all-inclusive engagement that will eventually culminate in the communities' acceptance to live and work with repentant andreintegratedpeople. • The roadmap must emphasise building community cohesion and resilience, with a particular focus on strengthening the role of traditional institutions in the affected communities. • An effective early warning and communication system should be put in place. Participants emphasised the importance of having an effective communication and coordination network between communities, government andsecurityagencies. • Theimportanceofaccountabilityforallparties in the insurgency was also emphasised. It was unanimous amongst participants that unless all perpetrators are brought to account, it will be difficult for communities to accept the rehabilitated Boko Haram extremists. Stakeholders advised OSC to utilise counter narratives to violent extremism in the process of de-radicalisation and rehabilitation of violent extremists. Relevant stakeholders such as the Ulamas (religious teachers and preachers) and formal education institutions should be involved in the deradicalisation and rehabilitationprocess. • Any programme that addresses rehabilitation andreintegrationshouldbeimplemented simultaneously with programmes addressing poverty, the plight of IDPs and malnutrition in theNortheast. Any attempt to reintegrate repentant Boko Haram fighters back into communities that remain negatively affected by Boko Haram's violence will be met with staunch resistance and may lead to subsequent violence. Particularcaremustbetakenonthisissue. The dialogue made the following recommendations about the role of various stakeholders in OSC including the government, security agencies, religiousandtraditionalinstitutions. • Ensure effective education and public awareness about OSC, particularly at the community level. OSC will succeed only if communities are willing to support it and assist in the reintegration of former Boko Haram fighters. The following were identified as immediate concerns from communities in the Northeast: a. Where are the rehabilitation programmes/facilities going to be located? b. What is the specific process of rehabilitating a repentant Boko Haram fighter? c. What safeguards are the government taking to ensure that those released back into the society do not revert to violent extremism. Where will the rehabilitated Boko Haram fighters be relocated? d. How will the government ensure criminal opportunists from neighbouring countries do not abuse Operation Safe Corridor? e. Many opine that the 12-week timeline established for rehabilitation is too short. • Operation Safe Corridor should be carried out in phases. • Participants identified the radio, television, social media platforms are the most effective communication tools for awareness about reintegration. TheGovernment: Propositions for Implementing Operation Safe Corridor
  • 5. • Government was advised to provide economic empowerment and rehabilitation programmes for both rehabilitated ex-violent extremists and people in communities that are affected by Boko Haram activities,andwherereintegrationwilltakeplace. • Ensure continuous dialogue and coordination amongst all stakeholders. Operation Safe Corridor will only work if everyone involved maintains communication and is able to adjust the programme to fit the individual needs of each surrendered militant and community members who will assist in the reintegration process. A 'one-size-fits-all' approachwillnotworkwithregardtoOSC. • Stakeholders think that rehabilitated violent extremists will only be accepted back into the communities where they come from, as other parts of the country will not accept them. Even so, they also encouraged government to take advantage of OSC to improve national peace education and carry out re-orientation programmes nationwide that wouldmakepeoplemoreinterestedinthepursuitof peace. • Use traditional and social media to counter violent extremist narratives and educate the population on the necessity and importance of OSC for political stability, human and national development andsecurity and peace in the Northeast in particular andNigeriaingeneral. • Encourage community members to participate in the full reintegration process for community legitimacy, acceptance and ownership. Government should ensure inclusive governance that provides all communitymemberswithavoice. • Government should carry out broad sensitisation that targets every possible means of reaching everyone in the Northeast. Sensitisation should address peaceful coexistence and the mutual benefit of reintegrating rehabilitated violent extremists. • Strengthen independent traditional institutions in the Northeast so that they are able to provide community cohesion, sensitisation and education for the acceptance of rehabilitated repentant violentextremistsinaffectedcommunities. • The rehabilitation programme must be employed simultaneously with efforts to address the many grievances the public have against Boko Haram as a result of their violent destruction of lives and propertyintheNortheastandbeyond. • Build inter-agency synergy and coordination amongst all security organisations for effective community intelligence that will aid reintegration plansandstrategy. • Ensure adequate intelligence gathering and sharing that authorities can use to inform decisions in the holisticimplementationofOSCintheNortheast. • Improve the capacity of all security agencies to address violent extremist threats that might hamper the efforts of government through OSC to rehabilitate, empower and reintegrated repentant violentextremists. • Ensure fair and equitable justice for all Nigerians as a way of building confidence and trust in government andOSC • Provide timely and lawful dispensation of justice for those who violate the law as a measure for instilling law and order in the Northeast and for the safe returnofrepentantviolentextremists. • Ensure non-interference in the affairs of traditional institutions for their independent role in the reintegration of rehabilitated repentant violent extremists. • Stay clear of politicising the OSC mandate and tasks forgenuineimplementationandachievementofthe setgoals. • In collaboration with government, restore traditional conflict resolution mechanisms to serve as preventive measures against future violent extremism and for reconciling societal objection to the reintegration of repentant Boko Haram extremists. Securityagencies: TheJudiciary: Politicians: TraditionalInstitutions:
  • 6. ReligiousInstitutions: Conclusion • Religious leaders should be at the centre of sensitising and de-radicalising members of the publicintheNortheast. • Religious leaders and scholars should take the lead in developing counter narratives to violent extremism and partner with OSC to de- radicalisesurrenderingviolentextremists. The dialogue presented an opportunity for stakeholders at the community level to interact with government on approaches to OSC and the deradicalisationandrehabilitationofBokoHaram insurgents. This resulted in a critical interaction between community-level stakeholders and government representatives at state and federal level and provided an opportunity for the development of sound approaches to reintegration and resettlement through OSC. The causes and effects of the conflict in theNortheastwerediscussedindetail. More importantly, the dialogue produced tangible ideas and strategies for a holistic approach to ending the conflict and ways to suppress future violent extremist organisations from emerging. Stakeholders who attended the meeting also developed a better understanding of Operation Safe Corridor and offered practical advice on how to improve the programme andmakeitworkatthecommunitylevel.