Bureaucracy can be defined as non-elected government officials responsible for administrative policymaking and following fixed rules. The civil services are regulated by standard operating procedures framed by elected officials, with bureaucrats accountable to elected representatives. Overall, the federal administrative system is effective and trustworthy because specialists design and implement programs, increasing the success probability of policies compared to non-specialists. For example, the defense department has a proven track record of protecting the nation and assisting civilians, demonstrating effective bureaucracy.
Define bureaucracy- List one example along with a brief description of.docx
1. Define bureaucracy. List one example along with a brief description of the overall purpose.
Describe how the civil services are regulated and analyze whether you think that the Federal
Administrative System is effective and trustworthy. State your reasons and give specific
examples.
Solution
bureucracy can be defined as a body of non elected government officials responsible mainly for
administrative policy making  and characterized by specialization of functions adhering to
fixed rules. for example consider the case of defence forces they perform the functions of
protecting the nation, providing intelligence information helping civilians during calamities , it
executes its functions through the various specialised agencies such as the armed forces, coast
guard, CIA etc. these agencies are specialised in character and are headaed by a bureaucrat who
performs the function of framinf poloicies and also act as coordinator between the govt. and the
agency.
a bureaucracy mainly shows the following components:
civil services are regulated by a SOP which is framed by legislation through elected officials and
the bureaucrats are responsible for thieir action to the elected representatives.
yes, broadly speaking, the federal administrative system is effective and trustwothy because it is
composed of specialists and they are the final authority involved in impelmentation of different
programs and as a matter of probability there is a greater chance of success of the policies as they
framed by specialists
for example if we again consider the example of defence department, they have given very good
results in the past and is proving to be effective in the present also without properly arranged
bureacracy there can be a complete disorder