The document discusses genome-wide sequencing for diagnosis of rare diseases in Canada. It notes the current unmet clinical need, with specialists taking 3-5 years on average to diagnose rare diseases and 40% of patients receiving more than 3 misdiagnoses. Access to clinical exome sequencing varies across Canada. The goal of the Partnership discussed is to ensure access to clinical genome-wide sequencing as standard of care for Canadians at risk for a serious genetic condition who would benefit from timely diagnosis and intervention. It will include access to sequencing, data governance, a pan-Canadian data ecosystem for sharing to catalyze innovation, engagement of patients/communities and health professionals, and establishment of a rare disease cohort and diagnostic ecosystem to scale data.
5. access to genome-wide
sequencing
data governance to
tackle social, economic
and policy issues
a pan-Canadian data
ecosystem for sharing to
catalyze innovation
a rare disease cohort to scale
data
patient and community
engagement to align genomic
solutions with relevant
problems and
health-care professional
engagement and education to
optimize precision health
delivery and patient care
6. Pan-Canadian Rare
Disease Diagnostic
Ecosystem• The ecosystem will allow data
sharing between institutions, across
jurisdictional boundaries and between
clinical and research settings
• Three tiers are envisaged
• local clinical sites storing raw
data
• provincial staging areas for data
harmonization and
• a web portal to query provincial
data for coded or aggregated
results
• An overarching goal is the passive
collection of data generated during
clinical care to be leveraged for
secondary use in research
6
10. The ECOGENENE-21
Clinical Research toolbox
Daniel Gaudet MD PhD
ECOGENE 21 and
Clinical Lipidology and Rare Genetic Lipid Disorders Unit
Community Gene Medicine Center
Département of Médecine, Université de Montréal
Chicoutimi, Qc
13. Ecogene-21 Highlights
n ECOGENE-21 is a non-for-profit organization dedicated to
developing connected clinical research capacity for rare
diseases prevention and gene/oligonucleotide-based
Therapies;
n EOGENE-21 operates as a biocluster having different,
complementary platforms
n Goal: Access
14. E-21 Main Platforms
n Network of clinical and translational research centers;
n Niche Clinical research Organisation (CRO) for rare or
severe diseases;
n Shareable experience with gene/oligonucleotide-based
therapies;
n A clinical research concierge service for patients
associations and other stakeholders;
n A world class Biobank and Biorepository (operated by
Genome Quebec);
n An innovation platform/lab
15. Integrating Concierge Clinical Research in
the ECOGENE-21 Portfolio for Rare Diseases
n Patients perspective
n Healthcare providers perspective
n Health decision makers perspective
n Payers perspective
n Industry perspective
n Public agencies / research groups perspective
16. E-21 Concierge Service key words
n Driven by unmet patients needs;
n Provides connected solutions to complex issues;
n Flexibility;
n Creative approaches;
n ACCESS;
17. ADigital Solution to Empower
Patients to Manage their Health
chronicallysimple.com/CORD
18. 11/21/19 CONFIDENTIAL2
Patient Experience
§ Built by a rare disease patient, every aspect of the
tool was created from the patient/caregiver lens
§ Chronically Simple is truly a one-stop, centralized
hub for every important facet of the patient’s
administrative burden that comes with living with a
chronic disease.
§ Patients have to be informed to be their own best
advocates. Having all medical information in one
secure location empowers patients to manage
their health.
chronicallysimple.com/CORD
19. 11/21/19 CONFIDENTIAL3
Caregiver Experience
§ Partnered with Brenda in her early years and of
managing the dreaded “binder” of test results and
imaging
§ Brenda had taken her son to over 200 appointments in
his first year and was looking for a solution to manage the
many appointments, notes for the doctors, results and
expenses
§ She was also worried about the continuity of her son’s
care should something happen to her. How could all of
her knowledge be transferred to another care team
member, without something being missed?
chronicallysimple.com/CORD
20. 11/21/19 CONFIDENTIAL4
Our Healthcare Solution
§ Built on a solid understanding of the
Canadian healthcare system: the patient
journey, security & privacy requirements and
information storage
§ Ability to scale globally with Innomar and ABC
§ Web-based and mobile application allows
user to access all their medical information
from any where and to update information &
share in real time
chronicallysimple.com/CORD
21. 11/21/19 CONFIDENTIAL5
Day at a Glance
Healthcare Providers
Medical Documents
This feature shows you what’s in store for
the day ahead on one screen.
Store all your healthcare providers’
details and associate them with
appointments, prescriptions and medical
records.
Keep all your medical records, diagnostic
images and test results in one secure
place. Take your past results to new
appointments to ensure continuity of care.
Appointment Reminders
Expenses
Medication Tracker
Don’t forget your appointments ever
again! Chronically Simple will send you
reminders.
Never lose a parking receipt again!
Keeping track of all your expenses will
make doing your taxes much less
stressful.
Store all your current and previous
medications. Receive reminders when
it’s time for a refill, ensuring you never
run out again.
chronicallysimple.com/CORD
25. Canadian Legislation Pertinent to the Regulation
of Gene and Cell Therapies
Food and Drugs Act
Gene Therapy is regulated under Food and Drug Regulations
§ Gene therapy is the introduction, removal, or change in the content of a
person’s genetic code with the goal of treating or curing a disease.
§ Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T cells) are T cells that have been
genetically engineered to produce an artificial T-cell receptor for use in
immunotherapy. Once the receptor binds to a tumor antigen, the T-cell is
stimulated to attack the malignant cells.
Food and
Drug
Regulations
CTO
Regulations
Medical
Device
Regulations
Drug / Medical Device
Combination Products
Policy
3
27. Regulatory Challenges: Advanced Therapeutic
Products (2019)
§ The speed at which innovative products can be developed, the method
with which they are made or distributed, and how data can be collected,
has resulted in a shift away from the traditional product development
model for which the current regulations are based
§ Some health products are so novel and distinct that it is difficult for
them to meet the current regulatory requirements
§ Lack of appropriate regulatory oversight for continuously changing
products and innovative business practices
5
3D PrintingGene Editing
Big Data
Artificial
Intelligence
Advanced
Cell
Therapies
Novel Drug
Delivery
33. Commercializing Living Therapies 2
Advanced Therapies – One of the Hottest Sectors in Biotech
• Capital Continues to Flow Into the Sector: 2018 was Record Year, 2019
Off to a Slow Start
o $13B raised in 2018; $7.4B raised by end Q3 2019
• Mega Rounds Continue to Grow: 22 Company Deals ≥ $100M
o Increasing trend to launch with large sized early stage rounds
§ Century Therapeutics: Raised $250M Series A
§ Allogene Therapeutics: Raised $411M Series A
§ Sana Biotechnology: Raised $215M Series A
• IPOs: 17 RM Company IPOs in 2018, 6 in 2019 YTD
o Over 50% are trading above initial share price
o 2018 totals just short of 2014 highs (2014; 21 IPOs, $1.5B Raised)
• Public Markets are Receptive to Cell & Gene Therapies – RM Index up
19.2% in 2018
• RM Company Valuations Continue to Rise – Currently 2.6x Higher than
Biotech Overall (2019 YTD)
• Big Pharma Continues to be Engaged – Increasing No. of Acquisitions to
Fill Pipeline
ADVANCED
THERAPIES
Cell Therapy
Cellular
Immunotherapy
Gene Therapy
Bio-moleculesBio-materials
34. Commercializing Living Therapies 3
Canadian Cell & Gene Therapy Landscape – Small but Growing
Raised $20M in investment & co-
development (Nov 2019)
Raised $82.5M (Sep 2019)
Raised $42M (Jan 2019)
Source: Pitchbook
Capital Invested
Deal Count
$14.33M
$0.30M
$6.43M
$13.32M $17.18M
$24.94M
$53.09M
$150.42M
$120.85M
$72.50M
$162.60M
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
$0.00M
$20.00M
$40.00M
$60.00M
$80.00M
$100.00M
$120.00M
$140.00M
$160.00M
$180.00M
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 YTD
Capital Invested (CAN) Deal Count (CAN)
$4.3B
$162M
54%
20%
20%
4% 2%
Ontario
Quebec
BC
Alberta
Manitoba
Deals Are Dominated by Three Provinces
US Fundraising Dwarfs Canadian Companies
Capital Invested, 2019 YTD (all figures USD)
Notable Recent Canadian Deals Cell Therapy trials in Canada
Canadian academic sponsored
International academic sponsored
Industry sponsored
~80
cell therapy
trials
35. Commercializing Living Therapies 4
Business Model: Collaborative, Capital-Efficient & Sustainable
NETWORKS
Academia
Industry
Investor
Proprietary
Development
Stakeholder
Engagement
Investment
BUSINESS
UNITS
VALUE
CENTRES
Deal Flow
Capabilities
Sustainability
OUTCOMES
IP
Market
Needs
37. THE PROBLEM
• Science is outpacing our historical business models
• Precision medicine -> monolithic diseases are now understood to be
many sub diseases
• Smaller patient populations
• Large markets are now multiple small markets
• Cost to develop therapies has not gone down in parallel
• Historical business model solution
• Smaller market à charge a higher price OR
• Effective therapies not being developed for small markets
Open Science for Children’s Health
38. THE HYPOTHESIS
• Open science can be used to reduce the cost and risk of drug
development and make small market drug development viable at
affordable prices
• Open Science: A commitment to rapid multilateral sharing of
knowledge, results, data and materials without patent restrictions
• Open science can bring in funds from foundations, granting
agencies, academic institutions and corporate “donations”
• Commercial opportunities will remain:
• Discovery/development costs are reduced à sustainable pricing can be lower
• Alternative IP assets (regulatory data and market exclusivities) can attract
partners to take-up de-risked asset through registration, manufacturing, and
distribution
Open Science for Children’s Health
39. THE EXPERIMENT
• Select a disease that:
• Represents an urgent medical need
• Has a limited commercial market or doesn’t fit historical business models
• Known genetic target
• Our scientific founders have insight into the target
• Favourable clinical path
• Objective:
• Access grants, foundations and corporate partners
• Share (give AND receive) scientific insights
• Aggressively promote open science
• Find motivated partners
• Retain IND and NDA data to gain regulatory exclusivity for out-licencing
Open Science for Children’s Health
40. A Genes to Affordable Medicines Corporate Structure
Agora Open Science
Trust
(Charity)
Open Science Drug
Discovery and
Development
M4K
Pharma Inc.
M4ND
Pharma Inc.
M4ID
Pharma Inc.
M4??
Pharma Inc.
Open Science for Children’s
Health
41. WHY USE A CORPORATE STRUCTURE
Open Science for Children’s Health
• Corporate structure allows us to apply for grants and foundation awards
• Act as a hub to “outsource” work to collaboration partners
• Working with industry CROs and academic institutions
• “Virtual” biotech model lowers costs
• Aggregating and aligning academic and industry collaborators to move along
drug development path
• Creates a vehicle which can enter into agreements to sell and/or partner its
assets
43. HOW IS THE EXPERIMENT GOING?
• Started lead series development program December 2017
• Ontario Institute of Cancer Research (Med Chem, project management)
• Charles River Laboratories (Med Chem, Assays)
• Reaction Biology Corp (Assays)
• Structural Genomics Consortium (Structural biology, assays)
• University of Toronto
• Oxford University
• University of North Carolina
• ICR UK (Med chem, in vivo PD model)
• Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona (in vivo PD model)
• Tufts University (assays)
• University of Pennsylvania (in vivo PD model)
• The Brain Tumour Charity
• Children’s National (in vivo PK)
Open Science for Children’s Health
44. HOW IS THE EXPERIMENT GOING?
• Monthly project meetings broadcast and available on YouTube
• Attracted pharma to discuss ALK2 project they had abandoned
• Scientific and clinician providing input
• https://m4kpharma.com/blog/
• Approximately 400 compounds synthesized to date
• 5 compounds met TPP and selected to enter preclinical candidate
selection studies in 2020 -> Select one compound to enter IND
enabling studies in 2021
Open Science for Children’s Health
45. PRACTICAL BENEFITS REALIZED FROM OPEN SCIENCE
Open Science for Children’s Health
q Partners have provided services at a reduced price or, in some cases, for free
q Dramatically lowered costs
q Allowed us to achieve much more than originally planned
q Roughly 4x as many compounds synthesized
q >300 versus 75 in original grant
q Extra funds used for more assays and initial efficacy studies
q Goal was to have one compound that met the Target Product Profile
46. BROADER OPEN SCIENCE ADVANTAGES
Open Science for Children’s Health
Micro advantages:
• Attractive to granting institutions
• Academic work is unencumbered
• Facilitates collaboration
Macro advantages:
• Cost savings to the pharmaceutical industry by avoiding multiple
companies running the same program in parallel or by avoiding previous
failures.
• Provides learnings about “dead ends” to the medical research community.
47. Contact
Max Morgan, JD, LLM
SGC Director of Policy & Legal
max.morgan@mail.utoronto.ca
FUNDING PARTNERS
The SGC is a registered charity (number 1097737) that receives funds from AbbVie, Bayer Pharma AG, Boehringer Ingelheim,
Canada Foundation for Innovation, Eshelman Institute for Innovation, Genome Canada through Ontario Genomics Institute
[OGI-055], Innovative Medicines Initiative (EU/EFPIA) [ULTRA-DD grant no. 115766], Janssen, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany,
MSD, Novartis Pharma AG, Ontario Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science (MRIS), Pfizer, São Paulo Research Foundation-
FAPESP, Takeda, and Wellcome [106169/ZZ14/Z].
Open Science for Children’s Health
49. REGULATORY EXCLUSIVITY VS. PATENTS
Regulatory exclusivities:
• Like patents, shield a product from generic competition
• Consistent with open science:
– Are not invalidated by prior disclosure/open sharing/
collaboration
• Virtually costless to obtain and enforce
• Not subject to challenge by competitors
• Provide a period of market protection that is certain ex
ante
50. POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS
• Translational Funding Opportunities for Open Drug Discovery (‘Push’
Mechanisms)
– Public translational funding programs should support open science drug discovery businesses
– Public funding of open trials for clinical proof of concept
• Enabling Digital Infrastructure for Open Science Projects
– E.g. open drug development data repository
• Voluntary Business Incentives for Open Drug Development (‘Pull’
Mechanisms)
– ‘Open science” regulatory exclusivity extension
• Quid pro quos: (1) open data, (2) no patents, (3) affordable pricing
– Regulator support – e.g. fast-track designation, priority review for ‘open science’ programs
51. Commercializing Living Therapies 5
Impact of Strategic Investment in Ecosystem
§ Global Outreach & Presentations
§ Industry Boards & Committees
§ Industry Initiatives
Academic & Industry Networks
Academic
Partnerships
Global Hubs –
Scaling the Model
Specialized
Infrastructure
Industry
Partnerships
Company Creation
and Scaling
Ventures
$150M RM Seed
Fund