The document compares various database companies and their products. It provides details on TmaxSoft, including its employee headcount, main products which include databases and middleware, and key technologies. It then discusses Tibero database specifically and how it compares to Oracle, including features, licensing model, compatibility, and security. Examples are also provided showing capabilities of Tibero compared to Oracle.

1. 1

2. 2
Company name Headcount % Developers
(source = LinkedIn Premium)
Software Developed
MariaDB
~210 50 ● MariaDB Enterprise
EDB (PostgreSQL)
~400 30 ● EDB Postgres Advanced Server
○ Several extensions adding enterprise functionalities to OSS PostgreSQL
2nd Quadrant (PostgreSQL)
>100 70 ● 2ndQ PostgreSQL
○ Several extensions adding enterprise functionalities to OSS PostgreSQL
TmaxSoft
~1300 80 ● OpenFrame (Mainframe Rehosting)
● JEUS (Application Server - Weblogic alternative)
● WebtoB (Enterprise Scalable Apache)
● Tmax (Middleware Transaction Manager)
● Tibero (RDBMS - Oracle DB Alternative, Native PL/SQL = PSM)
○ HyperData: ELT Flow designer with Graphs/Dashboards for BI or Data Virtualization
○ SysMaster for Tibero: Monitoring Tool for Tibero.
● ProSync (GoldenGate Alternative)
● AnyLink (Messaging Software, Queueing)
● SysMaster (Enterprise Monitoring)
● Cloud Stack (Private Cloud, Focused on Security, targeted to Government)
● ProLinux (Enterprise Linux for Production environments)
● TmaxOS (End-User Linux, Windows friendly + own Office Suite + own Cloud Collab.)
● TOP (TmaxSoft One Platform = Develop 1 App for any Platform = similar JVM)
● TmaxCDS ("Tmax Cloud Desktop Service" = Virtualized End-User Distributed Comp.)
Companies always avoided to deal with small companies because of low reliability. MariaDB, EDB or 2nd Q. could have 2 problems,
either they are not re-investing their money into R&D (greediness) or either the Open Source model is not beneficial for them.
Comparing CompaniesUpdated FEB-2020

3. 3

4. 4
Tibero Database
● Designed for Security against any foreign attacks from North Korea, China, Russia and US
● All inclusive licensing model => Higher quality application development
● Lift and Shift => In 90% cases; No need to face a migration. No need to change your
PL/SQL.
● Direct replacement for Oracle EE + Exadata => At better cost than Open Source Support
fees
● Flexibility => Easy to use with any Cloud, any Virtualization or Containers.

5. 5
Cost Functional Area Availability Often used for
Oracle RAC (only EE) $$ High Availability Tibero Active Cluster ✔ Horizontal Scaling
Active Data Guard $$ Disaster Recovery Hot Standby (read-only) ✔
Advanced Security $$ Security Data Encryption + Network Encryption ✔ GDPR
--- -- Security Protection against Data Tampering ✔ GDPR
Diagnostic Pack $$ Performance Tibero Performance Repository ✔ Diagnose performance
Tuning Pack $$ Performance Tibero Performance Repository ✔ Tune queries or the database instance
Partitioning $$ Performance + DWH Hash, Range, List, Interval or Composite Partitioning ✔
Advanced Compression $$ DWH + Storage savings Compression FOR OLTP = Default. ✔
Hybrid Columnar Compression
(HCC only with Exadata)
$$$$ DWH + Storage savings Columnar Compression ✔
Oracle Exadata + HW $$$$ Performance + DWH Predicate Filtering ✔
DB Gateways (5)
+ Big Data connectors
$$ Data connectivity
Heterogeneous DB Links
+ HDFS/HBase data connectors
✔ Data Virtualization
OLAP $$ DWH OLAP ✔
Multi-Tenant $$ Manageability Virtual Database ✔ Larger concept than Multi Tenancy
In-Memory $$$ Performance In-Memory ✔
Costs or Functionality?

6. 6
Example
Oracle Exadata HCC Fail
=> No HA Segment Operations
CREATE TABLE ROLI_TEST
( SEV_ID NUMBER NOT NULL,
SEV_GPR_ID NUMBER NOT NULL,
SEV_POSTTAG_DAT_ID NUMBER NOT NULL)
TABLESPACE USERS
PARTITION BY RANGE (SEV_POSTTAG_DAT_ID)
( PARTITION DWH_ROLI_2015M01 VALUES LESS THAN (20150201) TABLESPACE USERS,
PARTITION DWH_ROLI_2015M02 VALUES LESS THAN (20150301) TABLESPACE USERS,
PARTITION DWH_ROLI_2015M03 VALUES LESS THAN (20150401) TABLESPACE USERS);
CREATE BITMAP INDEX ROLI_SEV_FK_I ON ROLI_TEST
(SEV_ID)
LOCAL (
PARTITION DWH_ROLI_2015M01 TABLESPACE USERS,
PARTITION DWH_ROLI_2015M02 TABLESPACE USERS,
PARTITION DWH_ROLI_2015M03 TABLESPACE USERS);
ALTER TABLE ROLI_TEST MOVE PARTITION DWH_ROLI_2015M01 COMPRESS FOR ARCHIVE HIGH
TABLESPACE USERS;
-- Does it work or fail for you?
alter index ROLI_SEV_FK_I MODIFY PARTITION DWH_ROLI_2015M01 unusable;
ALTER TABLE ROLI_TEST MOVE PARTITION DWH_ROLI_2015M01 COMPRESS FOR ARCHIVE HIGH
TABLESPACE USERS;
-- and now? Does it work?
alter index ROLI_SEV_FK_I MODIFY PARTITION DWH_ROLI_2015M02 unusable;
alter index ROLI_SEV_FK_I MODIFY PARTITION DWH_ROLI_2015M03 unusable;
ALTER TABLE ROLI_TEST MOVE PARTITION DWH_ROLI_2015M01 COMPRESS FOR ARCHIVE HIGH
TABLESPACE USERS;
-- and now? Does it work?
alter index ROLI_SEV_FK_I rebuild partition DWH_ROLI_2015M01;
alter index ROLI_SEV_FK_I rebuild partition DWH_ROLI_2015M02;
alter index ROLI_SEV_FK_I rebuild partition DWH_ROLI_2015M03;
alter index ROLI_SEV_FK_I MODIFY PARTITION DWH_ROLI_2015M02 unusable;
ALTER TABLE ROLI_TEST MOVE PARTITION DWH_ROLI_2015M02 COMPRESS FOR ARCHIVE HIGH
TABLESPACE USERS;
-- and now? Does it work?
DROP TABLE ROLI_TEST purge;

7. 7
Exadata X7
Oracle 19c APR19
"Latest Patch"

8. 8
Tibero Zeta
any Cloud
AUG 2018 Patch
Due to this difference,
the customer that spent
a lot of money with
Exadata, they had to
schedule a
maintenance window to
compress the database
but not allowing the
operations to continue
the same over the
affected segments.
This problem is not
affecting Tibero
Database

9. 9
3 Highly-Available Architecture Types in Tibero DB
Shared-Disk Shared-Nothing 2-Tier
● On-Prem
● Disk can be the bottleneck
● Cloud / On-Prem
● Maximum budget savings
● Cloud / On-Prem
● Maximum Elasticity
DB Node stands for Read-Write DB Node. Disaster Recovery not included as HA in the architecture diagram above,
DR can be 1 or more DB Nodes Read-Only, additional to the nodes above.
DB
Node
DB
Node
Disk
DB
Node
Disk
DB
Node
Disk
DB
Node
Storage
Node
DB
Node
Storage
Node
Storage
Node
DB
Node
Disk

10. 10
Main architectural improvements
● Scalability
● Re-use of threads and resources
● Resource Efficiency (+50%)
○ Lightweight + Powerful
● Healthier Non-destructive
DB Instance behaviour
● Short Access Time to Clients
● Stable and Robust Performance

11. 11
How is the security without TDE in Oracle Database?
Security
Tibero uses stronger encryption algorithms since 2016,
at no additional cost.
SMS4 is the standard mobile encryption in China.
Tibero Database helps you comply for GDPR.
Encryption Algorithm Tibero 6 Oracle 12c
Transparent Data Encryption (TDE)
ARIA128
Oracle 18c
ARIA192
ARIA256
SEED
SMS4
DES
3DES168
AES128
AES192
AES256
SHA-1
MD5
MD4
Image Source: Oracle Security White paper
ARIA: Invented by the Korean National Security Research Institute
Tibero uses digital signature to strictly detect and block any
data manipulation attempts in the TDE (TmaxSoft Patent).
Example

12. 12
T-Up
“BIGFILE” tablespaces are not supported.
Tablespaces should be pre-created before
the migration starts, only for this case.

13. 13
Use Cases

14. 14
Flexibility
Which Cloud you prefer ? And Containerization tech. ? … Virtualization system ?
HP IA64 VM

15. 15
Data Federation >= Data Virtualization
Use Cases
● Data Consolidation
● Build a DWH
● Performing a company-wide
Data Transformation.
● Tibero includes:
○ Data Modeler Tool
○ Flow Designer
○ Monitoring

16. 16
EDW
Reducing ETL Complexity (Staging DB)
Sources
ETL Tools
EDW
Staging
Configure
Maintain
Troubleshoot
Without Tibero With Tibero
Sources
?

17. 17
Building a / Data Lake / EDW + Merging with Big Data
Without Tibero
Date: 2013-2014 (1 year duration)
Budget: 12M EUR in HW (OES = locked-in)
+ 3M EUR in Services (Oracle) 6 men + LICENSING Costs.
+ 1 Year contract with Dimensigon (1-man = OES Instructor)
With Tibero
Date: Now
Budget: Not comparable…. Under 500K. + Own HW
Duration: Less than few months. 1-2 people involved.
Open Source
No ETL Tools
required ($$)
No Big Data
Connectors
required ($)
No Additional
Gateway Software
to connect to
Mainframe
required ($$$)
OES = Oracle Engineered Systems HW = Hardware

18. 18

19. 19
Some references
Worldwide

20. 20
Founded in South Korea,
Headquartered in USA,
Globally Installed
Established
1997
Global Footprint
20 Locations
Chicago, IL—HQ
Technology Focused
+1300 employees
(over 80% R&D/technical)
Founder
Dr. Daeyeon Park
US/Global CEO
KV Suresh
R&D Investment
50%+ of Sales Revenue
References
+5000 Case Studies