Dr. Michael J. O’Connell, PainCare, New Hampshire commented that the country seems to be finally cooling off regarding the issues of race and police, as the media is taking a breather. Rationality is taking hold; that is until the next act of perceived brutality is splashed on Headline News. The standard opinion portrayed by the media, and assumed by the viewer, is that police subject blacks to a disproportionately high rate of arrest and of course violence, this despite available data/evidence.
See: https://michaeloconnellmdnh.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=1448&action=edit&postpost=v2
Dr. Michael J. O’Connell, PainCare, New Hampshire commented that the country seems to be finally cooling off regarding the issues of race and police, as the media is taking a breather. Rationality is taking hold; that is until the next act of perceived brutality is splashed on Headline News. The standard opinion portrayed by the media, and assumed by the viewer, is that police subject blacks to a disproportionately high rate of arrest and of course violence, this despite available data/evidence.
See: https://michaeloconnellmdnh.wordpress.com/wp-admin/post.php?post=1448&action=edit&postpost=v2
Keynote Jeremy Travis Columbia speech 4.29.16seprogram
Solutions to Post-Incarceration Employment and Entrepreneurship: The Role of Businesses and Universities
Jeremy Travis, President
John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Nicholas salzano shares a story of a prisoner who finds it difficult to adjus...Nicholas Salzano
Today, Nicholas Salzano, the storyteller from New York, will be telling a story of a prisoner named “Johnson”.Nicholas Salzano got teary-eyed while listening to the story of Johnson and wished him a healthy life ahead.
Keynote Jeremy Travis Columbia speech 4.29.16seprogram
Solutions to Post-Incarceration Employment and Entrepreneurship: The Role of Businesses and Universities
Jeremy Travis, President
John Jay College of Criminal Justice
Nicholas salzano shares a story of a prisoner who finds it difficult to adjus...Nicholas Salzano
Today, Nicholas Salzano, the storyteller from New York, will be telling a story of a prisoner named “Johnson”.Nicholas Salzano got teary-eyed while listening to the story of Johnson and wished him a healthy life ahead.
Maxillary procedures and soft tissue changes /certified fixed orthodontic cou...Indian dental academy
The Indian Dental Academy is the Leader in continuing dental education , training dentists in all aspects of dentistry and offering a wide range of dental certified courses in different formats.
Indian dental academy provides dental crown & Bridge,rotary endodontics,fixed orthodontics,
Dental implants courses.for details pls visit www.indiandentalacademy.com ,or call
0091-9248678078
Running head CRIMINALS AND SOCIETY .docxsusanschei
Running head: CRIMINALS AND SOCIETY
1
CRIMINALS AND SOCIETY 9
Criminals and Society
11/23/2016
Should minors who commit violent crimes be tried as adults that is the question. When courts take away trial and sentencing options, it is not possible to provide justice in every case. The great number of juvenile crimes, from petty vandalism to violent homicide, are handled by the juvenile justice system and not adult courts. The separation of the two systems is a recognition of the differences between juveniles and adults and offers juveniles greater opportunities for forgiveness and redemption. Juvenile courts exist mainly to rehabilitate youth who’ve done wrong. But that’s not possible or appropriate in every case. Some juveniles commit crimes so horrific in their depravity that justice could not be carried out in the juvenile system. Other crimes, and their perpetrators, show maturity that should be dealt with adult punishment. An example spanning both classes was a 16-year-old Sarah Johnson’s plot to murder her parents and pin the crime on an intruder. Her case was transferred to adult court, and Johnson was convicted and sentenced to life in prison. as reported by NYTIMES (2016).
Minors who commit violent crimes should be tried as adults but incarcerated in specific prisons. The reason is that regular prisons would negatively influence minors and may make them even more violent. These minors unless they are mentally handicapped can be held accountable for violent crimes. Violent crimes have serious consequences. In a violent crime a minor can be considered evil. Through violence a minor can become a menace to society because he or she can take a person’s life and there is no coming back from that. We live in a society that is civilized and if kids grow up thinking they can get away with murder then we can have chaos.
ABC reports that opponents of trying juveniles in adult courts say more needs to be done for the nation's young criminals and that the law needs to take into account their psychological development and maturity. The current system is so at odds with what the research tells us about the kids describes a deputy director and co-founder of the Philadelphia-based Juvenile Law Center. They are deciding at a point in the kid’s life when nobody knows who he'll be in 10, 15 or 20 years. It's like sentencing someone to die in prison. It is difficult making these decisions about kids under circumstances where the research doesn't support making those kinds of decisions. Prosecutors say they only consider this scenario if the juvenile is proven to be too dangerous for society. They do consider all the options for a juvenile court if they don't have a record. Based on the nature of the ...
The principle of a Civil Law System is one where the judiciary m.docxlourapoupheq
The principle of a
Civil Law System
is one where the judiciary must follow a certain set of laws or codes and is sometimes referred to as the neo-Roman or Romano-Germanic law system or model. France, Mexico and many Latin American countries still adhere to this form of law.
There is one state in the United States of America that follows or practices a Civil Law System.
What state is that?
Why does this state practice Civil Law?
Which form of law, Common Law or Civil Law, do you feel is more efficient?
The author of our text, when lecturing on the death penalty, states that the 8
th
. Amendment of our Constitution has these words in it which gives fuel to the debates over the death penalty. These words are “… nor cruel or unusual punishments inflicted.” It is felt that since the science of DNA testing has come about that more people have been condemned to receive the death penalty.
If DNA
plus
corroborating evidence is what helps put a person on death row, should they be executed if they are found sane and have been found guilty of a capital crime?
Do you consider lethal injection cruel or unusual punishment?
Which is more humane? Telling a condemned prisoner the exact date and time of their execution or to notify them the morning of the executions.
Do you think the death penalty should be abolished?
THIS IS WHERE THE QUESTION CAME FROM THE BOTTOM IS THE ONES YOU NEED TO REPLY TO
Louisiana
The state of Louisiana practices civil law mostly due to the French influence and was not founded on British common law approach like the other states.
Living in the United States I believe Common Law is more efficient because it seems to be more constitutional compared to civil law. However, I was born in Louisiana and my understanding of Civil Law is not held in a negative light. I just feel that since most of the states use common law it allows for more diverse options when it comes to the judicial system.
I struggled with this question for a long time spiritually because of the aspect of playing God is a dangerous slope. I have witnessed an execution when I worked in the prison system many years ago and I still felt conflicted. After growing up a bit and my years in law enforcement I have come to peace with the fact that the death penalty is needed in some situations. There are truly evil individuals out in the world with no conscious and if evidence is shown true they need to receive the death penalty.
No. I do not feel that lethal injection is a cruel form of punishment. In fact, I feel that it is actually a humane way to carry out the death penalty. Many murderers and serial killers butchered and tortured their victims and lethal injection provides a quick death that allows the person to drift out of consciousness and never wake up.
I think either way is humane because the results are the same. However, I think if someone knows they are receiving the death penalty on a certain day they have more opportunities to fight and appeal the decisions. Th.
ZACHARY SHEMTOB AND DAVID LATZachary Shemtob, formerly editor in.docxransayo
ZACHARY SHEMTOB AND DAVID LAT
Zachary Shemtob, formerly editor in chief of the Georgetown Law Review, is a clerk in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. David Lat is a former federal prosecutor. Their essay originally appeared in the New York Times in 2011.
Executions Should Be Televised
Earlier this month, Georgia conducted its third execution this year. This would have passed relatively unnoticed if not for a controversy surrounding its videotaping. Lawyers for the condemned inmate, Andrew Grant DeYoung, had persuaded a judge to allow the recording of his last moments as part of an effort to obtain evidence on whether lethal injection caused unnecessary suffering.
Though he argued for videotaping, one of Mr. DeYoung’s defense lawyers, Brian Kammer, spoke out against releasing the footage to the public. “It’s a horrible thing that Andrew DeYoung had to go through,” Mr. Kammer said, “and it’s not for the public to see that.”
We respectfully disagree. Executions in the United States ought to be made public.
Right now, executions are generally open only to the press and a few select witnesses. For the rest of us, the vague contours are provided in the morning paper. Yet a functioning democracy demands maximum accountability and transparency. As long as executions remain behind closed doors, those are impossible. The people should have the right to see what is being done in their name and with their tax dollars.
This is particularly relevant given the current debate on whether specific methods of lethal injection constitute cruel and unusual punishment and therefore violate the Constitution.
There is a dramatic difference between reading or hearing of such an event and observing it through image and sound. (This is obvious to those who saw the footage of Saddam Hussein’s hanging in 2006 or the death of Neda Agha-Soltan during the protests in Iran in 2009.) We are not calling for opening executions completely to the public — conducting them before a live crowd — but rather for broadcasting them live or recording them for future release, on the web or TV.
When another Georgia inmate, Roy Blankenship, was executed in June, the prisoner jerked his head, grimaced, gasped, and lurched, according to a medical expert’s affidavit. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that Mr. DeYoung, executed in the same manner, “showed no violent signs in death.” Voters should not have to rely on media accounts to understand what takes place when a man is put to death.
Cameras record legislative sessions and presidential debates, and courtrooms are allowing greater television access. When he was an Illinois state senator, President Obama successfully pressed for the videotaping of homicide interrogations and confessions. The most serious penalty of all surely demands equal if not greater scrutiny.
Opponents of our proposal offer many objections. State lawyers argued that making Mr. DeYoung’s execution public raised safety concerns..
ZACHARY SHEMTOB AND DAVID LATZachary Shemtob, formerly editor in.docxodiliagilby
ZACHARY SHEMTOB AND DAVID LAT
Zachary Shemtob, formerly editor in chief of the Georgetown Law Review, is a clerk in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York. David Lat is a former federal prosecutor. Their essay originally appeared in the New York Times in 2011.
Executions Should Be Televised
Earlier this month, Georgia conducted its third execution this year. This would have passed relatively unnoticed if not for a controversy surrounding its videotaping. Lawyers for the condemned inmate, Andrew Grant DeYoung, had persuaded a judge to allow the recording of his last moments as part of an effort to obtain evidence on whether lethal injection caused unnecessary suffering.
Though he argued for videotaping, one of Mr. DeYoung’s defense lawyers, Brian Kammer, spoke out against releasing the footage to the public. “It’s a horrible thing that Andrew DeYoung had to go through,” Mr. Kammer said, “and it’s not for the public to see that.”
We respectfully disagree. Executions in the United States ought to be made public.
Right now, executions are generally open only to the press and a few select witnesses. For the rest of us, the vague contours are provided in the morning paper. Yet a functioning democracy demands maximum accountability and transparency. As long as executions remain behind closed doors, those are impossible. The people should have the right to see what is being done in their name and with their tax dollars.
This is particularly relevant given the current debate on whether specific methods of lethal injection constitute cruel and unusual punishment and therefore violate the Constitution.
There is a dramatic difference between reading or hearing of such an event and observing it through image and sound. (This is obvious to those who saw the footage of Saddam Hussein’s hanging in 2006 or the death of Neda Agha-Soltan during the protests in Iran in 2009.) We are not calling for opening executions completely to the public — conducting them before a live crowd — but rather for broadcasting them live or recording them for future release, on the web or TV.
When another Georgia inmate, Roy Blankenship, was executed in June, the prisoner jerked his head, grimaced, gasped, and lurched, according to a medical expert’s affidavit. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported that Mr. DeYoung, executed in the same manner, “showed no violent signs in death.” Voters should not have to rely on media accounts to understand what takes place when a man is put to death.
Cameras record legislative sessions and presidential debates, and courtrooms are allowing greater television access. When he was an Illinois state senator, President Obama successfully pressed for the videotaping of homicide interrogations and confessions. The most serious penalty of all surely demands equal if not greater scrutiny.
Opponents of our proposal offer many objections. State lawyers argued that making Mr. DeYoung’s execution public raised safety concerns. ...
Similar to Crime News, Criminal Investigations, Lawsuits (8)
ZACHARY SHEMTOB AND DAVID LATZachary Shemtob, formerly editor in.docx
Crime News, Criminal Investigations, Lawsuits
1. Crime News, Criminal Investigations, Lawsuits
It will be easier to dismiss a person as being
"evil" rather as compared to to deal with your
tangle regarding social failures which we're
most complicit in. It's simpler to hate your
adult than to inquire what made a youngster
grow up seeking oblivion along with locating
fulfillment in a killing.
Matthew Chapman
Writer/director, 'The Ledge'; Author, Trials of
the Monkey'; President, ScienceDebate.org
Theirs is a tale associated with that which you anticipate might occur when boundaries are crossed,
when the rocker Eve tempts not merely an Adam, nevertheless a new Silicon Valley Master of the
Universe within the Garden of Eden.
Mary Papenfuss
Journalist; Author, 'Killer Dads: The Particular Twisted Drives In Which Compel Fathers for you to
Murder their Own Kids'
While the actual American public could probably treatment less with regards to me like a person --
I'm branded any criminal, any felon, right after all, which will not change -- that they should
treatment about what our nation's prison techniques do to those incarcerated within.
Christopher Zoukis
Award winning writer,Prisoner rights,education,and reform advocate,winner associated with PEN
American center Prison Composing Awards.
If we aren't ashamed of executing our lowlifes -- strange that rich folks never appear to have
executed, what's that most about? -- then allow the Bible become our manual as well as let's kill
many individuals pertaining to all kinds of crimes as well as let's do it brutally.
Matthew Chapman
Writer/director, 'The Ledge'; Author, Trials of the Monkey'; President, ScienceDebate.org
As the third anniversary associated with my brother's death approaches, this is the 1 thing that I'm
left with. My desires have got irreversibly changed.
As lengthy as there have been societies, use involving drugs and also alcohol have been any a
2. component of them. Abuse involving both drugs as well as alcohol is actually endemic, however
could probably be much better managed had been we to commence out treating drug and also
alcohol abuse in the identical way; that is the public health difficulty that truly needs treatment,
instead of merely as a criminal law problem.
Andrea Lyon
Dean involving Valparaiso university Law School, author as well as professor.
No lengthier will victims become relegated to some handful regarding defendants spending token
amounts inside just a couple of dozen cases for each year.
As the country will be horrified simply by another botched execution, a richesse protection lawyer
within Texas, a legal scholar in New York, as well as the former warden involving San Quentin cure
richesse punishment.
Last year, executions in the U.S. dipped to a 20-year low. Jones v Chappell just further erodes
confidence within the criminal justice system, as America travels on the way to death penalty
abolition.
Sexual violence should not occur in any kind of space, but its look within correctional facilities is
especially troubling -- prisons and jails are, throughout theory, controlled environments.
A botched execution furthermore erodes public confidence since it implies that one thing went
wrong using the very procedure for death, which usually we've entrusted in order to our leaders.
When any government hides info such because the supply of drugs used in lethal injection, it erodes
the public trust.
Jessica S. Henry
Associate Professor inside the Department of Justice Studies, Montclair State University
Last week, inside a historic victory for nearly 46,000 federal drug offenders, the particular united
States Sentencing Commission (USSC) voted unanimously for you to use latest amendments for the
federal drug sentencing guidelines retroactively to just about all or perhaps any qualified offenders.
Christopher Zoukis
Award winning writer,Prisoner rights,education,and reform advocate,winner associated with PEN
American center Prison writing Awards.
If actually your saying "Justice delayed is justice denied" features applicability, it's in this strange
case. Defendants that might become innocent and also whose constitutional legal rights were most
likely violated sit throughout prison.
Faced having a draconian selection through the SCOTUS in late April which in turn all however
eliminated meaningful restitution for youngster pornography victims, U.S. Senators Orrin Hatch and
Chuck Schumer spearheaded a new comprehensive legislative fix which in turn addresses the actual
concerns outlined within united States v. Paroline.
3. In 1960 the particular Supreme Court could have got kept Caryl Chessman from being executed in
San Quentin's death chamber. He has been executed greater than 11 years after his conviction,
following countless state and federal post-conviction proceedings and also appeals. Unfortunately,
the Supreme Court didn't seize in which opportunity.
Government can not police itself. Departments like the Internal Affairs Bureau with the NYPD and
the Inspector General involving The big Apple can only achieve this much. The idea takes the
lawyers for that injured and abused, to end up being able to protect the actual less potent and in
addition to effectuate accurate alter with regard to our communities.
Steven Brill
Criminal defense Attorney and also Founding partner regarding Sullivan Brill, LLP.
We must speak in regards for you to the wrongful conviction involving innocent men and also
women, for you to remind ourselves that we must look closely in a system which is flawed and will
sometimes fail. Yet in that vein, don't we in addition need to examine the particular consequences
when people who might actually be guilty are usually acquitted, particularly when they are repeat
offenders guilty of violent crimes?
When life was no longer really worth living, the girl ended it. I see simply no irony inside this. As a
tough, intelligent, impartial person, your woman failed to want either to shed the girl thoughts as
well as be considered a burden in order to anyone. The Girl has been an admirable woman who lived
your ex convictions.
Matthew Chapman
Writer/director, 'The Ledge'; Author, Trials with the Monkey'; President, ScienceDebate.org
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/crime/
