This document presents research on determining the personality types of students in the ARID AGRICULTURE (EVENING-BSIT-4) program and whether personality impacts class participation. The objectives are to see if personality contributes to low participation, if ambiverts exist, and the ratio of ambiverts. A questionnaire was administered to a sample of 14 less participatory students. The results and conclusion indicate that personality likely influences participation, ambiverts are rare, and teachers should employ strategies to engage introverts.

1. PERSONALITY TEST OF ARID
AGRICULTURE
(BSIT-EVENING-4)ABDULMOIZ AHMER (14-ARID-
4052)
UMAIR HASSAN (14-ARID-
4158)

2. RESEARCH
OBJECTIVES
To determine that could personality be the reason why some
students of ARID AGRICULTURE(EVENING-BSIT-4)
have low class participation.
To find out does ambivert personality trait really exist.
To find out the ratio of ambiverts existence in ARID
AGRICULTURE(EVENING-BSIT-4).

3. RESEARCH
QUESTIONS
Is personality one of the reasons due to which some
students of ARID AGRICULTURE(EVENING-
BSIT-4) have low class participation?
Does ambivert personality trait really exist?
 What is the ratio of the ambiverts existence in
ARID AGRICULTURE(EVENING-BSIT-4)?

4. POPULATION AND
SAMPLE
Population:
All the students of ARID
AGRICULTURE(EVENING-BSIT-4) are my
population.
Sample:
Fourteen students of ARID
AGRICULTURE(EVENING-BSIT-4) who
participate less in class discussions.

5. METHODOLOGY
We have designed a Questionnaire for this survey which
compromise of 10 questions in total.
In every class now a days there exists several social
groups so what we did was that we selected one person
randomly who participates less in the class activities from
every group.
As there are two sections in the BSIT EVENING and
since it was difficult for us to find out the social groups so
we took help from a person of other section too.

6. METHODOLOGY (CONTINUED……)
Overall the sample of our survey is clustered.
After collecting all the Questionnaires we
analyzed and evaluated the data to come up to
conclusion.

9. RESULTS

10. RESULTS

11. RESULTS

12. CONCLUSION
Judging from the percentage it can be concluded
that personality can be the reason for low
participation of the students.
Moreover ambiverts are less likely to be found.
Concluding on the behalf of this research ambiverts
are one or two from hundreds of people.
It should be the teacher’s responsibility to make
introverts participate in discussions by asking
questions or may be by using a methodology that
attracts them.