The document provides a rubric for assessing a supply and demand comic assignment. The rubric evaluates students on content, analysis, synthesis, and demonstrating competency. For strong performance, the comic would use in-depth content terms and facts to effectively answer the essential question. It would clearly analyze the information and use appropriate structure. For weak performance, the comic would use incomplete content terms and facts with minimal analysis and an ineffective structure. Students are tasked with creating an 8-slide comic demonstrating the relationship between supply and demand using one of three provided situations.
45%
SIMILARIT Y INDEX
EXCLUDE QUOT ES OFF
EXCLUDE
BIBLIOGRAPHY
OFF
The Leader as a Strategist Report
ORIGINALITY REPORT
The Leader as a Strategist Report
WRITECHECK REPORT
PAGE 1
Missing "," Yo u may need to place a co mma af ter this wo rd.
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
S/V T his subject and verb may no t agree. Pro o f read the sentence to make sure the subject agrees with the
verb.
Article Error Yo u may need to use an article bef o re this wo rd. Co nsider using the article t he .
Article Error Yo u may need to remo ve this article.
Article Error Yo u may need to remo ve this article.
PAGE 4
Article Error Yo u may need to use an article bef o re this wo rd.
P/V Yo u have used the passive vo ice in this sentence. Depending upo n what yo u wish to emphasize in the
sentence, yo u may want to revise it using the active vo ice.
Missing "," Yo u may need to place a co mma af ter this wo rd.
PAGE 5
Conf used Yo u have used it s in this sentence. Yo u may need to use it 's instead.
Proof read T his part o f the sentence co ntains a grammatical erro r o r misspelled wo rd that makes yo ur
meaning unclear.
Article Error Yo u may need to remo ve this article.
P/V Yo u have used the passive vo ice in this sentence. Depending upo n what yo u wish to emphasize in the
sentence, yo u may want to revise it using the active vo ice.
PAGE 6
Assignment Component
Unsatisfactory
Emerging
Proficient
Exemplary
Score
Content Knowledge: Understanding
Communicates understanding of the
organization’s current vision, mission, and strategy.
CO: 3
MSM PO: 2,4
MBA PO: 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.2, 3.3, 4.2, 4.3
MSOL PO: 1,5
ILO: 1,3,6
Response does not incorporate analysis or synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects lack of understanding of the specific topic within the discipline.
Response provides inaccurate supporting details and irrelevant examples.
Response incorporates minimal analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects a superficial understanding of the specific topic within the discipline.
Response provides few details and examples.
Response incorporates analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects understanding of the nature of the specific topic within the discipline and its applications in contemporary times.
Response provides necessary details and specific examples.
Response incorporates in-depth analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic leading to new conclusions and recommendations.
Response reflects a thorough understanding of the nature of the specific topic within the discipline and its applications in contemporary times.
Response provides a variety of insightful details and specific examples that consider different perspectives.
Unsatisfactory: <56
Emerging: 57-66
Proficient: 67-76
Exemplary: 77-80
______ / 80 pts
Comments
Content Knowledge: Application Comp.
45%
SIMILARIT Y INDEX
EXCLUDE QUOT ES OFF
EXCLUDE
BIBLIOGRAPHY
OFF
The Leader as a Strategist Report
ORIGINALITY REPORT
The Leader as a Strategist Report
WRITECHECK REPORT
PAGE 1
Missing "," Yo u may need to place a co mma af ter this wo rd.
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
S/V T his subject and verb may no t agree. Pro o f read the sentence to make sure the subject agrees with the
verb.
Article Error Yo u may need to use an article bef o re this wo rd. Co nsider using the article t he .
Article Error Yo u may need to remo ve this article.
Article Error Yo u may need to remo ve this article.
PAGE 4
Article Error Yo u may need to use an article bef o re this wo rd.
P/V Yo u have used the passive vo ice in this sentence. Depending upo n what yo u wish to emphasize in the
sentence, yo u may want to revise it using the active vo ice.
Missing "," Yo u may need to place a co mma af ter this wo rd.
PAGE 5
Conf used Yo u have used it s in this sentence. Yo u may need to use it 's instead.
Proof read T his part o f the sentence co ntains a grammatical erro r o r misspelled wo rd that makes yo ur
meaning unclear.
Article Error Yo u may need to remo ve this article.
P/V Yo u have used the passive vo ice in this sentence. Depending upo n what yo u wish to emphasize in the
sentence, yo u may want to revise it using the active vo ice.
PAGE 6
Assignment Component
Unsatisfactory
Emerging
Proficient
Exemplary
Score
Content Knowledge: Understanding
Communicates understanding of the
organization’s current vision, mission, and strategy.
CO: 3
MSM PO: 2,4
MBA PO: 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.2, 3.3, 4.2, 4.3
MSOL PO: 1,5
ILO: 1,3,6
Response does not incorporate analysis or synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects lack of understanding of the specific topic within the discipline.
Response provides inaccurate supporting details and irrelevant examples.
Response incorporates minimal analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects a superficial understanding of the specific topic within the discipline.
Response provides few details and examples.
Response incorporates analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects understanding of the nature of the specific topic within the discipline and its applications in contemporary times.
Response provides necessary details and specific examples.
Response incorporates in-depth analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic leading to new conclusions and recommendations.
Response reflects a thorough understanding of the nature of the specific topic within the discipline and its applications in contemporary times.
Response provides a variety of insightful details and specific examples that consider different perspectives.
Unsatisfactory: <56
Emerging: 57-66
Proficient: 67-76
Exemplary: 77-80
______ / 80 pts
Comments
Content Knowledge: Application Comp.
Assignment Component
Unsatisfactory
Emerging
Proficient
Exemplary
Score
Content Knowledge: Understanding
Communicates understanding of how to synthesize IKEA’s marketing function to explain its target customers, products/services, market position, etc.
CO 1
MSM PO: 2, 4, 5
MBA PO: 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3
ILO 1, 3, 6
Response does not incorporate analysis or synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects lack of understanding of the specific topic within the discipline.
Response provides inaccurate supporting details and irrelevant examples.
Response incorporates minimal analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects a superficial understanding of the specific topic within the discipline.
Response provides few details and examples.
Response incorporates analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects understanding of the nature of the specific topic within the discipline and its applications in contemporary times.
Response provides necessary details and specific examples.
Response incorporates in-depth analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic leading to new conclusions and recommendations.
Response reflects a thorough understanding of the nature of the specific topic within the discipline and its applications in contemporary times.
Response provides a variety of insightful details and specific examples that consider different perspectives.
Unsatisfactory: <28
Emerging: 28-31
Proficient: 31-34
Exemplary: 35-36
______ / 36 pts
Comments
Content Knowledge: Application Component 1
Communicates the ability to synthesize IKEA’s three sources of value in its value chain to explain its relation to wants and needs of customers, value proposition and focus of customer value in its supply chain.
CO: 3
MSM PO: 2, 4
MBA PO: 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.3
ILO: 1, 2, 3, 6
Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue within the context of the topic area.
Response fails to provide supporting details or examples.
Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the context of the topic area using a few details.
Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline.
Response is supported by current literature, but is not consistently done.
.
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world contexts.
Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature.
Response demonstrates an exemplary understanding o ...
Criteria Unsatisfactory Emerging Proficient Exemplary
Content Knowledge:
Application Component 1
Communicates the ability to
summarize the significant
findings of your analyses. A
concise and insightful
summary of the significant
findings of your analysis
findings and the
recommendations you have
for your exe
Response exhibits substantial
gaps in knowledge of the
disciplinary content knowledge.
Response provides a minimal
explanation of the specific issue
within the context of the topic
area.
Response fails to provide
supporting details or examples.
Response exhibits some gaps
in knowledge of the disciplinary
content knowledge.
Response discusses the specific issue
superficially within the context of the
topic area using a few details.
Response relates the specific aspect of
the issue to applicable areas within
the discipline.
Response is supported by current
literature, but is not consistently
done.
Response demonstrates a working
command of the disciplinary content
knowledge.
Response examines the specific issue
within the context of the topic area using
relevant details and examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of
the issue to applicable areas within the
discipline and their relevance to real
world contexts.
Response is adequately supported by
current and relevant literature.
Response demonstrates an exemplary
understanding of the disciplinary
content.
Response provides an in-depth
discussion of the specific issue within
the context of the topic area using
relevant details and numerous examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of
the issue to applicable areas within the
discipline and provides insightful
recommendations related to real world
contexts.
Response is supported by current and
relevant literature based on sound
theories and best practices leading to
effective conclusions.
Content Knowledge:
Application Component 2
Communicates the ability to
identify the most important
Strategic Issues facing your
business unit. CO 1,4 PO
1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.3,
4.1, 4.2 ILO 1, 3, 5, 6
Response exhibits substantial
gaps in knowledge of the
disciplinary content knowledge;
Response provides a minimal
explanation of the specific issue
within the context of the topic
area
Response fails to provide
supporting details or examples.
Response exhibits some gaps
in knowledge of the disciplinary
content knowledge.
Response discusses the specific issue
superficially within the context of the
topic area using a few details.
Response relates the specific aspect of
the issue to applicable areas within
the discipline.
Response is supported by current
literature, but is not consistently
done.
Response demonstrates a working
command of the disciplinary content
knowledge.
Response examines the specific issue
within the context of the topic area using
relev.
Assignment Component
Unsatisfactory
Emerging
Proficient
Exemplary
Score
Content Knowledge: Understanding
Communicates understanding of assignment by synthesizing data to explain a strategic overview ofyour company, its services and all other required data.
CO 1
MSM PO: 2, 4, 5
MBA PO: 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3
ILO 1, 3, 6
Response does not incorporate analysis or synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects lack of understanding of the specific topic within the discipline.
Response provides inaccurate supporting details and irrelevant examples.
Response incorporates minimal analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects a superficial understanding of the specific topic within the discipline.
Response provides few details and examples.
Response incorporates analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects understanding of the nature of the specific topic within the discipline and its applications in contemporary times.
Response provides necessary details and specific examples.
Response incorporates in-depth analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic leading to new conclusions and recommendations.
Response reflects a thorough understanding of the nature of the specific topic within the discipline and its applications in contemporary times.
Response provides a variety of insightful details and specific examples that consider numerous perspectives.
Unsatisfactory: <36
Emerging: 36-41
Proficient: 42-46
Exemplary:47-48
______ / 48 pts
Comments
Content Knowledge: Application Component 1
Communicates the ability to analyze the supply chain for student’s identified company by explaining all the following required key elements of the supply chain.
CO: 3
MSM PO: 2, 4
MBA PO: 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.3
ILO: 1, 2, 3, 6
Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue within the context of the topic area.
Response fails to provide supporting details or examples.
Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the context of the topic area using a few details.
Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline.
Response is supported by current literature, but is not consistently done.
.
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world contexts.
Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature
Response demonstrates an exemplary understanding of the disciplinary content.
Response provi ...
Assignment Component
Unsatisfactory
Emerging
Proficient
Exemplary
Score
Content Knowledge: Understanding
Communicates understanding of the
organization’s current vision, mission, and strategy.
CO: 3
MSM PO: 2,4
MBA PO: 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.2, 3.3, 4.2, 4.3
MSOL PO: 1,5
ILO: 1,3,6
Response does not incorporate analysis or synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects lack of understanding of the specific topic within the discipline.
Response provides inaccurate supporting details and irrelevant examples.
Response incorporates minimal analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects a superficial understanding of the specific topic within the discipline.
Response provides few details and examples.
Response incorporates analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects understanding of the nature of the specific topic within the discipline and its applications in contemporary times.
Response provides necessary details and specific examples.
Response incorporates in-depth analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic leading to new conclusions and recommendations.
Response reflects a thorough understanding of the nature of the specific topic within the discipline and its applications in contemporary times.
Response provides a variety of insightful details and specific examples that consider different perspectives.
Unsatisfactory: <56
Emerging: 57-66
Proficient: 67-76
Exemplary: 77-80
______ / 80 pts
Comments
Content Knowledge: Application Component 1
Communicates the ability to analyze the “strategic
cascade” of the organization
and complete a SWOT analysis.
CO: 3
MSM PO: 2,4
MBA PO: 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.2, 3.3, 4.2, 4.3
MSOL PO: 1,5
ILO: 1,3,6
Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue within the context of the topic area.
Response fails to provide supporting details or examples.
Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the context of the topic area using a few details.
Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline.
Response is supported by current literature, but is not consistently done.
.
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world contexts.
Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature.
Response demonstrates an exemplary understanding of the disciplinary content.
Response provides an in-depth discussion of the specific issue within the co ...
LASA Rubric
Assignment Component
Unsatisfactory
< 76%
Emerging
77%-86%
Proficient
87%-96%
Exemplary
97%-100%
Score
Communicates the ability to evaluate and apply relevant academic literature
CO 2
PO 2,3,4
ILO 1,2,3,4,5,6
Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue within the context of the topic area.
Response fails to provide supporting details or examples.
Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the context of the topic area using a few details.
Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline.
Response is supported by current literature, but is not consistently done.
.
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world contexts.
Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature
Response demonstrates an exemplary understanding of the disciplinary content.
Response provides an in-depth discussion of the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and numerous examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and provides insightful recommendations related to real world contexts.
Response is supported by current and relevant literature based on sound theories and best practices leading to effective conclusions.
Unsatisfactory: <30
Emerging: 31-34
Proficient: 35-38
Exemplary: 39-40
______ / 40 pts
Comments
Communicates the ability to analyze the case through the four frames
CO 2
PO 2,3,4
ILO 1,2,3,4,5,6
Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue within the context of the topic area.
Response fails to provide supporting details or examples.
Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the context of the topic area using a few details.
Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline.
Response is supported by current literature, but is not consistently done.
.
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world contexts.
Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature
R ...
CGD218.W1J1.11.12.13Description Total Possible Score 3.00.docxtidwellveronique
CGD218.W1J1.11.12.13
Description:
Total Possible Score: 3.00
Content
Total: 2.25
Distinguished - Responds with a thorough reflection that is related to all aspects of the journal prompt. Applies professional, personal, relevant prior knowledge, and/or other real-world experiences in a manner that is rich in thought and provides valuable insight into the topic. Analyzes preconceptions and biases by deconstructing elements of personal assumptions and synthesizes own awareness using new modes of thinking.
Proficient - Responds with a reflection that is related to almost all aspects of the journal prompt. Applies professional, personal, or other real-world experiences in a manner that provides valuable insight into the topic. Provides a limited analysis of preconceptions and biases and somewhat synthesizes own awareness using new modes of thinking.
Basic - Responds with a reflection that is related to most aspects of the journal prompt. Applies professional, personal, or other real-world experiences in a manner that provides limited insight into the topic but may not be wholly relevant to the journal prompt. Demonstrates self-reflection by identifying preconceptions or biases compared to new modes of thinking.
Below Expectations - Responds with a reflection that is related to some aspects of the journal prompt. Attempts to apply professional, personal, or other real-world experiences, but their relevance to the journal prompt is unclear. Self-reflection is vague and/or fails to relate to preconceptions or biases and new modes of thinking.
Non-Performance - The journal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Coherence
Total: 0.45
Distinguished - Effectively communicates ideas or points in a logical and organized manner. Reflections are sophisticated and formulate wholly appropriate and pertinent connections between the journal topic and relevant prior knowledge.
Proficient - Communicates ideas or points in a manner that is mostly logical and organized. Reflections formulate appropriate connections between the journal topic and relevant prior knowledge.
Basic - Communicates ideas or points in a manner that demonstrates a limited understanding of content organization. Attempts to reflect upon journal topic, but the connections between the journal topic and prior knowledge are vague.
Below Expectations - Attempts to communicate ideas or points; however, the content organization is extremely limited. Fails to provide a reflection that connects the journal topic to prior knowledge.
Non-Performance - The journal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Mechanics
Total: 0.30
Distinguished - Journal contains no errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.
Proficient - Journal contains only a few minor errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure, but they do not distract the reader from the content.
Basic - Journal contains a f ...
Assignment Component
Unsatisfactory
Emerging
Proficient
Exemplary
Score
Content Knowledge: Understanding
Communicates understanding of how to synthesize IKEA’s marketing function to explain its target customers, products/services, market position, etc.
CO 1
MSM PO: 2, 4, 5
MBA PO: 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3
ILO 1, 3, 6
Response does not incorporate analysis or synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects lack of understanding of the specific topic within the discipline.
Response provides inaccurate supporting details and irrelevant examples.
Response incorporates minimal analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects a superficial understanding of the specific topic within the discipline.
Response provides few details and examples.
Response incorporates analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects understanding of the nature of the specific topic within the discipline and its applications in contemporary times.
Response provides necessary details and specific examples.
Response incorporates in-depth analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic leading to new conclusions and recommendations.
Response reflects a thorough understanding of the nature of the specific topic within the discipline and its applications in contemporary times.
Response provides a variety of insightful details and specific examples that consider different perspectives.
Unsatisfactory: <28
Emerging: 28-31
Proficient: 31-34
Exemplary: 35-36
______ / 36 pts
Comments
Content Knowledge: Application Component 1
Communicates the ability to synthesize IKEA’s three sources of value in its value chain to explain its relation to wants and needs of customers, value proposition and focus of customer value in its supply chain.
CO: 3
MSM PO: 2, 4
MBA PO: 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.3
ILO: 1, 2, 3, 6
Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue within the context of the topic area.
Response fails to provide supporting details or examples.
Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the context of the topic area using a few details.
Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline.
Response is supported by current literature, but is not consistently done.
.
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world contexts.
Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature.
Response demonstrates an exemplary understanding o ...
Criteria Unsatisfactory Emerging Proficient Exemplary
Content Knowledge:
Application Component 1
Communicates the ability to
summarize the significant
findings of your analyses. A
concise and insightful
summary of the significant
findings of your analysis
findings and the
recommendations you have
for your exe
Response exhibits substantial
gaps in knowledge of the
disciplinary content knowledge.
Response provides a minimal
explanation of the specific issue
within the context of the topic
area.
Response fails to provide
supporting details or examples.
Response exhibits some gaps
in knowledge of the disciplinary
content knowledge.
Response discusses the specific issue
superficially within the context of the
topic area using a few details.
Response relates the specific aspect of
the issue to applicable areas within
the discipline.
Response is supported by current
literature, but is not consistently
done.
Response demonstrates a working
command of the disciplinary content
knowledge.
Response examines the specific issue
within the context of the topic area using
relevant details and examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of
the issue to applicable areas within the
discipline and their relevance to real
world contexts.
Response is adequately supported by
current and relevant literature.
Response demonstrates an exemplary
understanding of the disciplinary
content.
Response provides an in-depth
discussion of the specific issue within
the context of the topic area using
relevant details and numerous examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of
the issue to applicable areas within the
discipline and provides insightful
recommendations related to real world
contexts.
Response is supported by current and
relevant literature based on sound
theories and best practices leading to
effective conclusions.
Content Knowledge:
Application Component 2
Communicates the ability to
identify the most important
Strategic Issues facing your
business unit. CO 1,4 PO
1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.3,
4.1, 4.2 ILO 1, 3, 5, 6
Response exhibits substantial
gaps in knowledge of the
disciplinary content knowledge;
Response provides a minimal
explanation of the specific issue
within the context of the topic
area
Response fails to provide
supporting details or examples.
Response exhibits some gaps
in knowledge of the disciplinary
content knowledge.
Response discusses the specific issue
superficially within the context of the
topic area using a few details.
Response relates the specific aspect of
the issue to applicable areas within
the discipline.
Response is supported by current
literature, but is not consistently
done.
Response demonstrates a working
command of the disciplinary content
knowledge.
Response examines the specific issue
within the context of the topic area using
relev.
Assignment Component
Unsatisfactory
Emerging
Proficient
Exemplary
Score
Content Knowledge: Understanding
Communicates understanding of assignment by synthesizing data to explain a strategic overview ofyour company, its services and all other required data.
CO 1
MSM PO: 2, 4, 5
MBA PO: 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3
ILO 1, 3, 6
Response does not incorporate analysis or synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects lack of understanding of the specific topic within the discipline.
Response provides inaccurate supporting details and irrelevant examples.
Response incorporates minimal analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects a superficial understanding of the specific topic within the discipline.
Response provides few details and examples.
Response incorporates analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects understanding of the nature of the specific topic within the discipline and its applications in contemporary times.
Response provides necessary details and specific examples.
Response incorporates in-depth analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic leading to new conclusions and recommendations.
Response reflects a thorough understanding of the nature of the specific topic within the discipline and its applications in contemporary times.
Response provides a variety of insightful details and specific examples that consider numerous perspectives.
Unsatisfactory: <36
Emerging: 36-41
Proficient: 42-46
Exemplary:47-48
______ / 48 pts
Comments
Content Knowledge: Application Component 1
Communicates the ability to analyze the supply chain for student’s identified company by explaining all the following required key elements of the supply chain.
CO: 3
MSM PO: 2, 4
MBA PO: 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.3
ILO: 1, 2, 3, 6
Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue within the context of the topic area.
Response fails to provide supporting details or examples.
Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the context of the topic area using a few details.
Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline.
Response is supported by current literature, but is not consistently done.
.
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world contexts.
Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature
Response demonstrates an exemplary understanding of the disciplinary content.
Response provi ...
Assignment Component
Unsatisfactory
Emerging
Proficient
Exemplary
Score
Content Knowledge: Understanding
Communicates understanding of the
organization’s current vision, mission, and strategy.
CO: 3
MSM PO: 2,4
MBA PO: 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.2, 3.3, 4.2, 4.3
MSOL PO: 1,5
ILO: 1,3,6
Response does not incorporate analysis or synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects lack of understanding of the specific topic within the discipline.
Response provides inaccurate supporting details and irrelevant examples.
Response incorporates minimal analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects a superficial understanding of the specific topic within the discipline.
Response provides few details and examples.
Response incorporates analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic.
Response reflects understanding of the nature of the specific topic within the discipline and its applications in contemporary times.
Response provides necessary details and specific examples.
Response incorporates in-depth analysis and synthesis of central concepts of the assigned topic leading to new conclusions and recommendations.
Response reflects a thorough understanding of the nature of the specific topic within the discipline and its applications in contemporary times.
Response provides a variety of insightful details and specific examples that consider different perspectives.
Unsatisfactory: <56
Emerging: 57-66
Proficient: 67-76
Exemplary: 77-80
______ / 80 pts
Comments
Content Knowledge: Application Component 1
Communicates the ability to analyze the “strategic
cascade” of the organization
and complete a SWOT analysis.
CO: 3
MSM PO: 2,4
MBA PO: 1.1, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 3.2, 3.3, 4.2, 4.3
MSOL PO: 1,5
ILO: 1,3,6
Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue within the context of the topic area.
Response fails to provide supporting details or examples.
Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the context of the topic area using a few details.
Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline.
Response is supported by current literature, but is not consistently done.
.
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world contexts.
Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature.
Response demonstrates an exemplary understanding of the disciplinary content.
Response provides an in-depth discussion of the specific issue within the co ...
LASA Rubric
Assignment Component
Unsatisfactory
< 76%
Emerging
77%-86%
Proficient
87%-96%
Exemplary
97%-100%
Score
Communicates the ability to evaluate and apply relevant academic literature
CO 2
PO 2,3,4
ILO 1,2,3,4,5,6
Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue within the context of the topic area.
Response fails to provide supporting details or examples.
Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the context of the topic area using a few details.
Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline.
Response is supported by current literature, but is not consistently done.
.
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world contexts.
Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature
Response demonstrates an exemplary understanding of the disciplinary content.
Response provides an in-depth discussion of the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and numerous examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and provides insightful recommendations related to real world contexts.
Response is supported by current and relevant literature based on sound theories and best practices leading to effective conclusions.
Unsatisfactory: <30
Emerging: 31-34
Proficient: 35-38
Exemplary: 39-40
______ / 40 pts
Comments
Communicates the ability to analyze the case through the four frames
CO 2
PO 2,3,4
ILO 1,2,3,4,5,6
Response exhibits substantial gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response provides a minimal explanation of the specific issue within the context of the topic area.
Response fails to provide supporting details or examples.
Response exhibits some gaps in knowledge of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response discusses the specific issue superficially within the context of the topic area using a few details.
Response relates the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline.
Response is supported by current literature, but is not consistently done.
.
Response demonstrates a working command of the disciplinary content knowledge.
Response examines the specific issue within the context of the topic area using relevant details and examples.
Response analyzes the specific aspect of the issue to applicable areas within the discipline and their relevance to real world contexts.
Response is adequately supported by current and relevant literature
R ...
CGD218.W1J1.11.12.13Description Total Possible Score 3.00.docxtidwellveronique
CGD218.W1J1.11.12.13
Description:
Total Possible Score: 3.00
Content
Total: 2.25
Distinguished - Responds with a thorough reflection that is related to all aspects of the journal prompt. Applies professional, personal, relevant prior knowledge, and/or other real-world experiences in a manner that is rich in thought and provides valuable insight into the topic. Analyzes preconceptions and biases by deconstructing elements of personal assumptions and synthesizes own awareness using new modes of thinking.
Proficient - Responds with a reflection that is related to almost all aspects of the journal prompt. Applies professional, personal, or other real-world experiences in a manner that provides valuable insight into the topic. Provides a limited analysis of preconceptions and biases and somewhat synthesizes own awareness using new modes of thinking.
Basic - Responds with a reflection that is related to most aspects of the journal prompt. Applies professional, personal, or other real-world experiences in a manner that provides limited insight into the topic but may not be wholly relevant to the journal prompt. Demonstrates self-reflection by identifying preconceptions or biases compared to new modes of thinking.
Below Expectations - Responds with a reflection that is related to some aspects of the journal prompt. Attempts to apply professional, personal, or other real-world experiences, but their relevance to the journal prompt is unclear. Self-reflection is vague and/or fails to relate to preconceptions or biases and new modes of thinking.
Non-Performance - The journal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Coherence
Total: 0.45
Distinguished - Effectively communicates ideas or points in a logical and organized manner. Reflections are sophisticated and formulate wholly appropriate and pertinent connections between the journal topic and relevant prior knowledge.
Proficient - Communicates ideas or points in a manner that is mostly logical and organized. Reflections formulate appropriate connections between the journal topic and relevant prior knowledge.
Basic - Communicates ideas or points in a manner that demonstrates a limited understanding of content organization. Attempts to reflect upon journal topic, but the connections between the journal topic and prior knowledge are vague.
Below Expectations - Attempts to communicate ideas or points; however, the content organization is extremely limited. Fails to provide a reflection that connects the journal topic to prior knowledge.
Non-Performance - The journal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Mechanics
Total: 0.30
Distinguished - Journal contains no errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure.
Proficient - Journal contains only a few minor errors related to grammar, spelling, and sentence structure, but they do not distract the reader from the content.
Basic - Journal contains a f ...
1. Names: Date: Pd:
Rubric- Supply and Demand Comic
Skill Assessed Strong - 4 Proficient - 3 Basic - 2 Weak - 1
Content Use of content terms Use of content terms Use of content terms Use of content terms
demonstrates an in depth demonstrates an demonstrates an demonstrates an incomplete
and effective understanding understanding of the understanding of the or inaccurate understanding
of the topic. There is a topic. There is use of topic but leaves some of the topic. Minimal use of
substantial use of facts that facts that are connected aspects unaddressed. facts vaguely connection to
are strongly connected to to the activity. Limited facts that are the activity.
the activity. somewhat connection
to the activity.
Analysis Clearly logical response Response that includes Response that includes Response that has little
that includes worthwhile worthwhile information some information that worthwhile information and
information that is that addresses the partially addresses the addresses the essential
connected to and essential question. essential question. question in a limited way.
effectively answers the
essential question.
Synthesis Student uses most if not all Student uses some key Student uses a limited Student uses minimal key
of the key terms the words and the response number of key words words and response has an
response has an effective has an appropriate and the response has a ineffective or simplistic
structure. structure. confusing structure. structure.
Competency 2 Illustration/cartoon and Illustration/cartoon and Illustration/cartoon and Illustration/cartoon and
student evaluation student evaluation student evaluation student evaluation
demonstrates an effective demonstrates a grasp demonstrates a limited demonstrates a confused or
grasp of the target of the target grasp of the target inaccurate grasp of the
competency. competency. competency. target competencies.
2. Names: Date: Pd:
Supply and Demand Comic
(50 pts)
TASK: In groups of two create an 8-slide comic that demonstrates the relationship between supply and demand.
Choose from the following situations:
1. A popular holiday item of your choice. What is the price of the item before the holiday, during, after? How and why does
the price change?
2. How do unexpected weather conditions increase the demand of certain items or services? Think about the demand for
the item or service before the weather conditions, during, and after. What is the relationship? How and why did they
change?
3. Come up with your own situation that embodies the relationship between supply and demand. Make sure you get
teacher approval first.
Requirements:
8 slide comic
Demonstrates an understanding of the following concepts: law of supply, law of demand, equilibrium, and
disequilibrium (excess supply, excess demand).
*** ATTACH ONE RUBRIC TO THE BACK OF YOUR COMIC WITH BOTH NAMES ON IT.