Comparison
of Cloud
Storage
Providers
AWS, Google Cloud,
and Azure
Introduction
●This presentation provides a comparison of
cloud storage services offered by the three
major cloud providers: Amazon Web Services
(AWS), Google Cloud Platform (GCP), and
Microsoft Azure. Key factors such as pricing,
storage types, scalability, and additional
features are highlighted.
Comparison Overview
●Factors considered in the comparison:
●- Storage Types: Object, Block, and File
Storage
●- Pricing: Cost per GB
●- Scalability and Performance
●- Integration with Other Services
●- Security and Compliance Features
AWS Cloud Storage
● Services:
● - Amazon S3 (Object Storage)
● - Amazon EBS (Block Storage)
● - Amazon EFS (File Storage)
● Pricing:
● - $0.023/GB for S3 Standard
● Features:
● - Highly scalable and durable
● - Extensive integration with AWS ecosystem
● - Advanced security and compliance options
Google Cloud Storage
● Services:
● - Google Cloud Storage (Object Storage)
● - Persistent Disks (Block Storage)
● - Filestore (File Storage)
● Pricing:
● - $0.020/GB for Standard Storage
● Features:
● - Strong analytics and AI integrations
● - Multi-regional availability
● - Competitive pricing with flexible storage classes
Azure Cloud Storage
● Services:
● - Azure Blob Storage (Object Storage)
● - Azure Disk Storage (Block Storage)
● - Azure Files (File Storage)
● Pricing:
● - $0.018/GB for Hot Blob Storage
● Features:
● - Seamless integration with Microsoft products
● - Comprehensive hybrid cloud capabilities
● - Robust security and compliance options
Feature Comparison Table
Feature AWS Google Cloud Azure
Storage Types Object, Block,
File
Object, Block,
File
Object, Block,
File
Pricing (per GB) $0.023 $0.020 $0.018
Scalability High High High
Security Advanced Advanced Robust
Conclusion
● Each provider has its strengths:
● AWS: Best for diverse use cases and extensive ecosystem.
● Google Cloud: Ideal for analytics and AI-driven solutions.
● Azure: Excellent for hybrid environments and Microsoft
integrations.
● Choose based on specific business requirements and workloads.

Cloud_Storage_Comparison_AWS_GCP_Azure.pptx

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Introduction ●This presentation providesa comparison of cloud storage services offered by the three major cloud providers: Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google Cloud Platform (GCP), and Microsoft Azure. Key factors such as pricing, storage types, scalability, and additional features are highlighted.
  • 3.
    Comparison Overview ●Factors consideredin the comparison: ●- Storage Types: Object, Block, and File Storage ●- Pricing: Cost per GB ●- Scalability and Performance ●- Integration with Other Services ●- Security and Compliance Features
  • 4.
    AWS Cloud Storage ●Services: ● - Amazon S3 (Object Storage) ● - Amazon EBS (Block Storage) ● - Amazon EFS (File Storage) ● Pricing: ● - $0.023/GB for S3 Standard ● Features: ● - Highly scalable and durable ● - Extensive integration with AWS ecosystem ● - Advanced security and compliance options
  • 5.
    Google Cloud Storage ●Services: ● - Google Cloud Storage (Object Storage) ● - Persistent Disks (Block Storage) ● - Filestore (File Storage) ● Pricing: ● - $0.020/GB for Standard Storage ● Features: ● - Strong analytics and AI integrations ● - Multi-regional availability ● - Competitive pricing with flexible storage classes
  • 6.
    Azure Cloud Storage ●Services: ● - Azure Blob Storage (Object Storage) ● - Azure Disk Storage (Block Storage) ● - Azure Files (File Storage) ● Pricing: ● - $0.018/GB for Hot Blob Storage ● Features: ● - Seamless integration with Microsoft products ● - Comprehensive hybrid cloud capabilities ● - Robust security and compliance options
  • 7.
    Feature Comparison Table FeatureAWS Google Cloud Azure Storage Types Object, Block, File Object, Block, File Object, Block, File Pricing (per GB) $0.023 $0.020 $0.018 Scalability High High High Security Advanced Advanced Robust
  • 8.
    Conclusion ● Each providerhas its strengths: ● AWS: Best for diverse use cases and extensive ecosystem. ● Google Cloud: Ideal for analytics and AI-driven solutions. ● Azure: Excellent for hybrid environments and Microsoft integrations. ● Choose based on specific business requirements and workloads.