This document provides an overview of the course materials and assignments for CJS 251 Entire Course. It includes summaries of weekly topics like the history and purpose of courts, courtroom participants, emerging issues in the criminal justice system, and types of sentences. Assignments involve papers, presentations, and quizzes on topics like the dual court system, roles of legal professionals, trial procedures, and alternatives to incarceration. The course appears to provide a comprehensive overview of the U.S. criminal justice system.
This document summarizes a law review article that examines differing interpretations among circuit courts of the mens rea (mental state) requirement for conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 841, which criminalizes possession or distribution of chemicals knowing or having reasonable cause to believe they will be used to make controlled substances. Most circuits require the prosecution to prove the defendant had reasonable cause to believe this would occur, using an objective standard, while the 10th Circuit requires proving actual knowledge, a subjective standard. The author explores the debate between objective and subjective mens rea standards.
Titlow v. Burt U.S. Supreme Court briefChris Harden
1. Vonlee Titlow was convicted of second-degree murder for participating in his uncle's murder with his aunt Billie Rogers in order to inherit the uncle's estate. Titlow had originally agreed to a plea deal but later withdrew the plea.
2. Titlow filed for habeas corpus relief claiming ineffective assistance of counsel, specifically that his attorney Frederick Toca provided deficient counsel by allowing him to withdraw his plea and maintain his claim of innocence.
3. The Sixth Circuit granted habeas relief, but the state argues it failed to give appropriate deference to the state court ruling under AEDPA. The state argues Titlow failed to meet the Strickland and Lafler tests to prove ineffective assistance of counsel
This document is a court opinion from the District Court of Appeal of Florida regarding a petition for writ of certiorari filed by Andrea Kidder seeking to quash a discovery order requiring her to disclose the results of a blood alcohol test. The court denied the petition, finding that under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(d)(1)(B)(ii), Kidder was required to disclose the results of the scientific blood alcohol test to the prosecution as part of the reciprocal discovery process after electing to participate in discovery. The court rejected Kidder's argument that the test results were protected work product, determining that the rule requires disclosure of scientific test results regardless of whether the expert conducting the test will be called as a witness.
This document provides an overview of the course materials and assignments for CJS 251 Entire Course. It includes summaries of weekly topics like the history and purpose of courts, courtroom participants, emerging issues in the criminal justice system, and types of sentences. Assignments involve papers, presentations, and quizzes on topics like the dual court system, roles of legal professionals, trial procedures, and alternatives to incarceration. The course appears to provide a comprehensive overview of the U.S. criminal justice system.
This document summarizes a law review article that examines differing interpretations among circuit courts of the mens rea (mental state) requirement for conviction under 21 U.S.C. § 841, which criminalizes possession or distribution of chemicals knowing or having reasonable cause to believe they will be used to make controlled substances. Most circuits require the prosecution to prove the defendant had reasonable cause to believe this would occur, using an objective standard, while the 10th Circuit requires proving actual knowledge, a subjective standard. The author explores the debate between objective and subjective mens rea standards.
Titlow v. Burt U.S. Supreme Court briefChris Harden
1. Vonlee Titlow was convicted of second-degree murder for participating in his uncle's murder with his aunt Billie Rogers in order to inherit the uncle's estate. Titlow had originally agreed to a plea deal but later withdrew the plea.
2. Titlow filed for habeas corpus relief claiming ineffective assistance of counsel, specifically that his attorney Frederick Toca provided deficient counsel by allowing him to withdraw his plea and maintain his claim of innocence.
3. The Sixth Circuit granted habeas relief, but the state argues it failed to give appropriate deference to the state court ruling under AEDPA. The state argues Titlow failed to meet the Strickland and Lafler tests to prove ineffective assistance of counsel
This document is a court opinion from the District Court of Appeal of Florida regarding a petition for writ of certiorari filed by Andrea Kidder seeking to quash a discovery order requiring her to disclose the results of a blood alcohol test. The court denied the petition, finding that under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220(d)(1)(B)(ii), Kidder was required to disclose the results of the scientific blood alcohol test to the prosecution as part of the reciprocal discovery process after electing to participate in discovery. The court rejected Kidder's argument that the test results were protected work product, determining that the rule requires disclosure of scientific test results regardless of whether the expert conducting the test will be called as a witness.
Government’s response to defendant’s petition for review of magistrate’s repo...Cocoselul Inaripat
This document is the government's response to the defendant's petition for review of the magistrate's order denying bond and ordering pretrial detention. The government argues that the defendant has not demonstrated any new information warranting reopening of the detention hearing. It also argues the magistrate's findings that the defendant poses a flight risk were not clearly erroneous. The government asserts the defendant's petition should be denied.
Government’s response to defendant traian bujduveanu’s motion for severanceCocoselul Inaripat
This document is a response by the United States government opposing a motion for severance filed by defendant Traian Bujduveanu. Bujduveanu and co-defendant Hassan Saied Keshari were indicted for conspiracy to violate sanctions against Iran and export restrictions on arms. The government argues that severance is not warranted, as Bujduveanu fails to cite any specific statements or evidence that would unfairly prejudice him. Joinder of the defendants was proper under the rules as they were alleged to have participated in the same conspiracy. A joint trial is also presumed appropriate for co-conspirators.
This document summarizes a court case regarding whether expert testimony on the causal link between benzene exposure and acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) was properly excluded. Brian Milward alleged his APL was caused by workplace benzene exposure and offered expert Dr. Martyn Smith to establish general causation. The district court excluded Dr. Smith's testimony but the appellate court reversed, finding the testimony admissible. The appellate court reviewed the district court's application of the Daubert standard for reliability of expert testimony.
This document provides discovery materials to the defendants in a criminal case involving charges related to exporting aircraft parts to Iran. It includes:
1) CDs and images of computer data seized from the defendants containing emails and files.
2) Reports of post-arrest interviews of the two defendants.
3) Notification that physical documents and items seized can be inspected by the defendants, and copies of documents ordered.
4) A request for reciprocal discovery from the defendants and commitment to provide ongoing discovery required by law, including Brady and Giglio materials.
1) The document outlines the procedural history of the extradition request by the US against Julian Assange, including the charges in the second superseding indictment of 18 counts relating to conspiring to hack computers to obtain classified US defense information and publishing names that put individuals' safety at risk.
2) The charges include conspiracy, computer intrusion, and various counts of obtaining and disclosing national defense information unlawfully while aiding Chelsea Manning in accessing classified information from a protected computer network.
3) Assange is alleged to have published significant activity reports from wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as diplomatic cables containing names of individuals, putting them at risk, from 2010 to 2019. His defense disputes that the information har
BIA Remands of Immigration Judge William Cassidy 01/01/2014-05/26/2016Bryan Johnson
EOIR FOIA ID # 2016-23184. Also, see acknowledgment letter at following link: http://www.slideshare.net/abogadobryan/eoir-acknowledgment-letter-for-201623284
This document is a memorandum opinion and order from a United States District Court regarding a motion for summary judgment in a toxic exposure case. The plaintiffs, Gregory and Tammy Cripe, allege that Gregory Cripe suffered injuries from exposure to toxic adhesives at work. The defendants, Henkel Corporation and National Starch & Chemical, sought summary judgment on the grounds that the plaintiffs failed to properly disclose expert witnesses on causation, which is necessary to establish their claims of negligence and strict liability. The court found that the plaintiffs' sole disclosed expert, Dr. Patricia Robinson, was not qualified to testify on causation. Further, the plaintiffs' attempt to designate treating physicians as causation experts by attaching their medical records to Dr
This document is an order from a United States District Court regarding cross-motions for summary judgment in a case involving a plaintiff who was imprisoned at a halfway house operated by the defendant. The court provides background on the case, including that the plaintiff sued over alleged unlawful seizure of his property and constitutional violations. The court evaluates the motions using the standard for summary judgment, granting the defendant's motion and denying the plaintiff's motion.
BIA Remands of Immigration Judge Madline Garcia from 01/01/2014 to 05/26/2016Bryan Johnson
EOIR FOIA ID # 2016-23184. Also, see acknowledgment letter at following link: http://www.slideshare.net/abogadobryan/eoir-acknowledgment-letter-for-201623284
Business Law Multiple Choice Questions (Enter your answers on th.docxhumphrieskalyn
Business Law
Multiple Choice Questions (Enter your answers on the enclosed answer sheet)
1) The court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education had what effect on the decision
made in Plessy v. Ferguson?
a. It showed that precedent can be overruled and is not binding in every situation.
b. It applied the Doctrine of Stare Decisis.
c. It showed that the Constitution is not subject to interpretation.
d. It applied the principle of preemption.
e. It followed precedent.
2) Someone who believes that law is a reflection of those in power, believes in which
school of jurisprudential thought?
a. The Analytical School.
b. The Natural School.
c. The Command School.
d. The Historical School.
e. The Psychological School.
3) Which of the following is a false statement regarding the citizenship and immigration
policy of the United States?
a. Immigration quotas are different for each foreign country.
b. The first immigration quota policy was enacted in the 1920s.
c. The immigration quota policy was repealed after World War II.
d. There is an immigration quota policy in effect today in the United States.
e. Immigration laws are administered and enforced by the United States Customs and
Immigration Service.
4) The remedy, or relief, that was available in the law courts of England was:
a. specific performance.
b. monetary awards for damages.
c. fines and imprisonment.
d. returning the parties to their positions before the dispute arose.
e. Any of the above, and any other remedy determined to be fair in the particular case.
5) Chancery Courts were also known as:
a. Criminal Courts.
b. Equity Courts.
c. Legal Remedy Courts.
d. Merchant Courts.
e. Law Courts.
64
shapeType75fBehindDocument1pWrapPolygonVertices8;4;(21496,0);(0,0);(0,21487);(21496,21487)posrelh0posrelv0pib
Business Law
65
6) When statutes are organized by topic, the resulting compilation of law is known as:
a. precedent.
b. a code.
c. civil law.
d. topical presentation.
e. common law.
7) Which of the following is not empowered to establish administrative agencies?
a. A state executive branch.
b. Congress.
c. A federal or state judicial branch.
d. A state legislative branch.
e. The federal executive branch.
8) For which of the following in the U.S. Congress can the number to which a state is
entitled change over time?
a. All members of the u.s. Congress.
b. Senators.
c. Both Senators and representatives.
d. Neither senators nor representatives.
e. Representatives.
9) The power of the federal government to make treaties with Native American Nations
regarding land and land use is derived from the:
a. Privileges and Immunities Clause.
b. Supremacy Clause.
c. First Amendment.
d. Commerce Clause.
e. Equal Protection Clause.
10) If there is an area of interstate commerce that the federal government has chosen not
to regulate, the states can:
a. not regulate in that area because states cannot pass laws affecting interstate com-
merce.
b. ...
5Final ExaminationBCJ 240 Procedures in the Justice Sy.docxalinainglis
5
Final Examination
BCJ 240 Procedures in the Justice System
Multiple Choice Questions (Enter your answers on the enclosed answer sheet)
Typically, the lowest-level court(s) in a given state is/are: 1.
courts of general jurisdiction.a.
the state supreme court.b.
intermediate appellate courts.c.
courts of limited jurisdiction. d.
Each state has its own highest court, typically referred to as: 2.
superior courts.a.
intermediate appellate courts.b.
state supreme courts.c.
courts of limited jurisdiction. d.
At the federal level, the lowest-level trial court is referred to as: 3.
U.S. Supreme Court.a.
U. S. courts of appeals.b.
district courts.c.
trial courts. d.
When an appellate court reverses a lower court’s decision, it: 4.
nullifies or sets aside a trial verdict. a.
adjudicates the case.b.
sends the case to a higher court for reviewc.
sets the defendant free.d.
When an appellate court agrees with a lower court’s decision, it _____ that decision. 5.
reversesa.
affirmsb.
remandsc.
vacates d.
In order for a case to reach the Supreme Court, the court must decide whether it wants to 6.
hear the case. If the Supreme Court agrees that case is worth deciding, it issues what is
known as a:
lex loci.a.
jus cogens.b.
certiorari.c.
writ of certiorari.d.
6
Final Examination
BCJ 240 Procedures in the Justice System
Which of the following is NOT a reason a “bright-line” decision may be helpful? 7.
It promotes consistency.a.
It promotes clarity and predictability.b.
It is ambiguous. c.
It is subject to very little interpretation. d.
Police conduct that is considered reasonable by the police officer engaged in the conduct is 8.
referred to as:
subjective reasonableness.a.
objective reasonableness.b.
reasonable objectiveness.c.
unreasonable objectiveness. d.
The term “objective reasonableness” in criminal procedure refers to: 9.
what a single individual believes is reasonable.a.
what a reasonable person believes is reasonable.b.
what a jury believes is reasonable.c.
what a reasonable person would do or feel under the circumstances. d.
Judicial restraint refers to: 10.
limiting decisions to the facts of each case.a.
deciding cases based on additional, hypothetical situations.b.
interpreting complex legal issues.c.
relying on case law to determine outcomes. d.
The past Supreme Court requirement that a physical intrusion by authorities must have taken 11.
place to violate one’s privacy is referred to as the:
electronic communication protection doctrine.a.
privacy doctrine.b.
trespass doctrine.c.
physical protection doctrine. d.
7
Final Examination
BCJ 240 Procedures in the Justice System
In the Section 1983 context, the requirement that the plaintiff (i.e., the party suing) 12.
generally has to prove that the defendant officer intended for the violation to occur is
referred to as
liabilitya.
credibilityb.
accountability c.
culpability d.
.
406075RR The Foundations of Criminal Justice.docxwrite4
This document appears to be an exam for a course on the foundations of criminal justice. It consists of 25 multiple choice questions testing knowledge of key concepts and components of the US criminal justice system, including exceptions to the exclusionary rule, the role of the arraignment process, constitutional amendments that protect defendant rights, measurement of crime statistics, use of plea bargains, and biological and psychological theories of criminal behavior. The exam covers topics addressed in the course textbook such as costs of corporate crime, reasons the Supreme Court did not initially incorporate the Bill of Rights, and percentages of violent crimes unreported to police.
406075RR The Foundations of Criminal Justice.docxwrite12
This document appears to be an exam for a course on the foundations of criminal justice. It consists of 25 multiple choice questions testing knowledge of key concepts and components of the US criminal justice system, including exceptions to the exclusionary rule, the role and rights of defendants at different stages of the legal process such as arraignment, constitutional amendments that protect defendant rights, different types of crime data collection and measurements, plea bargains and other efficiency increasing measures, incorporation of the Bill of Rights, search and seizure allowances, prohibited punishments, requirements for arrest warrants, crime reporting rates, grounds for appeal, biological factors potentially related to criminal behavior, and theories of criminology including biocriminology.
POL 110 Enhance teaching - snaptutorial.comDavisMurphyA68
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
POL 110 Week 1 Discussion How Active Is Your Government
POL 110 Week 2 Discussion Does the need for national security conflict with our personal rights
Effectively Arguing Constitutional Speedy Trial Violations in Georgia Crimina...Ben Sessions
Georgia criminal defense attorney Ben Sessions discusses how to effectively present and argue motions to dismiss based upon constitutional speedy trial violations in Georgia.
BAM 521 Publisher Pearson Prentice Ha II Business Law .docxikirkton
BAM 521
Publisher:
Pearson Prentice Ha II
Business Law
Text: Contemporary Business and Online Commerce Law
Sixth Edition, 2009
ISBN: 10: 0-13-601500-X
Author(s):
Henry R. Cheeseman
shapeType75fBehindDocument1pWrapPolygonVertices8;4;(21498,0);(0,0);(0,21482);(21498,21482)posrelh0posrelv0pib
Business Law
Multiple Choice Questions (Enter your answers on the enclosed answer sheet)
1) The court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education had what effect on the decision
made in Plessy v. Ferguson?
a. It showed that precedent can be overruled and is not binding in every situation.
b. It applied the Doctrine of Stare Decisis.
c. It showed that the Constitution is not subject to interpretation.
d. It applied the principle of preemption.
e. It followed precedent.
2) Someone who believes that law is a reflection of those in power, believes in which
school of jurisprudential thought?
a. The Analytical School.
b. The Natural School.
c. The Command School.
d. The Historical School.
e. The Psychological School.
3) Which of the following is a false statement regarding the citizenship and immigration
policy of the United States?
a. Immigration quotas are different for each foreign country.
b. The first immigration quota policy was enacted in the 1920s.
c. The immigration quota policy was repealed after World War II.
d. There is an immigration quota policy in effect today in the United States.
e. Immigration laws are administered and enforced by the United States Customs and
Immigration Service.
4) The remedy, or relief, that was available in the law courts of England was:
a. specific performance.
b. monetary awards for damages.
c. fines and imprisonment.
d. returning the parties to their positions before the dispute arose.
e. Any of the above, and any other remedy determined to be fair in the particular case.
5) Chancery Courts were also known as:
a. Criminal Courts.
b. Equity Courts.
c. Legal Remedy Courts.
d. Merchant Courts.
e. Law Courts.
64
shapeType75fBehindDocument1pWrapPolygonVertices8;4;(21496,0);(0,0);(0,21482);(21496,21482)posrelh0posrelv0pib
Business Law
65
6) When statutes are organized by topic, the resulting compilation of law is known as:
a. precedent.
b. a code.
c. civil law.
d. topical presentation.
e. common law.
7) Which of the following is not empowered to establish administrative agencies?
a. A state executive branch.
b. Congress.
c. A federal or state judicial branch.
d. A state legislative branch.
e. The federal executive branch.
8) For which of the following in the U.S. Congress can the number to which a state is
entitled change over time?
a. All members of the U.S. Congress.
b. Senators.
c. Both Senators and representatives.
d. Neither senators nor representatives.
e. Representatives.
9) The power of the federal government to make treaties with Native American Nations
regarding land and land use is derived from the:
a. Privileges and Immunities Clause.
b. Sup ...
This document provides guidance on preparing for and conducting depositions. It discusses gathering documents and information in advance through discovery and interviews. It recommends talking to the client to understand the facts and potential witnesses, and talking to opposing counsel to understand their position without arguing your own case. The document outlines goals for depositions such as obtaining admissions, limiting testimony, and evaluating witnesses. It provides strategic advice such as having a structured plan and not volunteering extra information. The "Ten Commandments" section advises the client or deponent to listen carefully, answer only the question asked, and admit mistakes.
Final Examination2BAM 317 Business LawMultiple Cho.docxmydrynan
Final Examination
2
BAM 317 Business Law
Multiple Choice Questions (Enter your answers on the enclosed answer sheet)
1) Which doctrine was overturned in the case of Brown v. Board of Education?
a. the legality of poll taxes
b. the permissibility of separate but equal facilities
c. allowing only white males to vote
d. the acceptability of paying women less than men for comparable work
e. different working hours for male and female factory workers
2) Documents such as the U.S. Constitution, the Magna Carta, and the United Nations Charter
reflect what legal theory?
a. the Natural Law school
b. the Historical school
c. the Sociological school
d. the Analytical school
3) Proponents of which school(s) of jurisprudential thought are unlikely to adhere to precedent in
making decisions?
a. the Sociological school only
b. the Critical Legal Studies school only
c. both the Sociological school and the Critical Legal Studies school
d. neither the Sociological school nor the Critical Legal Studies school
4) Which of the following is most consistent with the Natural Law School of jurisprudence?
a. Law is based on moral and ethical principles of what are right, and it is the job of men
and women, through study, to discover what these principles are.
b. The law is a reflection of society, thus the law must change naturally as society
changes over time.
c. The laws of man are secondary to the laws of nature, and thus the laws of nature take
precedence whenever the laws of man are in conflict with the laws of nature.
d. By applying the rules of logic to specific cases, the logical, or natural, result will be
obtained.
e. Laws must first and foremost respect, preserve, and promote the preservation of the
environment and life in all its forms.
5) What was the only remedy (relief) available in the law courts of England?
a. specific performance
b. fines and imprisonment
c. monetary awards for damages
d. returning the parties to their positions before the dispute arose
3
Final Examination
BAM 317 Business Law
6) Which court was eventually combined with the regular court system?
a. law courts
b. equity courts
c. criminal courts
d. merchant courts
7) What is an equity court’s function?
a. To deal with just the law of merchants.
b. To issue opinions in cases that later set the precedent for similar cases.
c. To investigate the merits of a case and base its decisions on fairness.
d. To issue executive orders.
e. To set state or federal laws between two or more nations.
8) The ability of Native American Indians to conduct gambling operations on Indian reservations:
a. is determined solely by the respective Indian tribe
b. is determined through negotiation by the state and Native Americans
c.is within the control of the federal government because of provisions in the U.S. Consti-
tution
d. has been found by the courts, in many ins ...
Raphael: SOC 203 Criminology
Fieldwork Assignments
Your fieldwork assignments constitutes 30% of your final grade. The assignment is completed in
two stages. The first stage requires conducting three brief ethnographic observations (50%) and
the second stage requires one comparative ethnographic analysis (50%), following the rubrics
and writing composition processes provided. This assignment shows that students can critically
observe, collect, synthesize, and interpret data using a variety of analytic frameworks. It is
therefore the aim of this assignment to not only serve as the partial satisfaction of this course’s
requirements but also the opportunity to write a quality writing sample that can be used for
future employment or graduate study.
While it is recognized that students have other life commitments, producing college-level writing
is not something that ‘just happens.’ This assignment requires planning your time well and a
focused effort.
Stage One: Three Brief Ethnographies (50%)
Based upon your readings of Goffman and Blackboard selections on writing field notes, your
fieldwork assignment is to visit 2 different New York City courts and 1 Federal Court. Based
upon your notes and class discussions, you are required to report back your observations in
three 5-page papers; one for each court. You should plan to spend 2 to 3 hours on each
observation – the approximate length of either a morning session or afternoon session. Also,
keep in mind that all persons entering the courthouse must go through a magnetometer. Please
arrive in time to allow for security screening.
At anytime, the judge or other court officials might inquire about you observing. Remember to
identify yourself as a student. Most court hearings are public but some are closed for the
preservation of the rights of some parties. You can always slip into a different courtroom!
Rubric for Each Observation:
Introduction (1/2 page; introduce the problem; make sure to specify which court,
presiding Judge, type of hearings attending, etc.) (10 %)
Setting and Symbolism of the Court (1 page) (20 %)
The Ritualistic Elements of Interaction (1 page) (20 %)
The Story (2 pages; What happened/What is going on here?) (40 %)
Concluding Reflection (1/2 page; What do you think about this experience? / Bring it all
together!!!) (10 %)
Composition Process:
1. Perform Each Observation and Take Notes
2. Draft 1: Write Up Each Narrative Separately (Simply describe what happened!)
3. Draft 2: Perform Analysis (Apply relevant sociological concepts to your narrative!)
4. Visit Writing Center to Create Draft 3
5. Hand in Draft 3 Early to Receive Feedback (Optional)
6. Revise Draft 3 into Final Draft and Submit via SafeAssign!
Stage Two: A Comparative Ethnographic Analysis (50%)
Assess to what degree your own court observations are in line with Steve Bogira's observations
as presented in his book, Courtroom 302. B ...
Bankruptcy Attorney Houston | 09/09/2005 Special Session ActHelixSEO
Plaintiff Chapter 7 debtor filed a motion for summary judgment on his claim that defendant creditor should be judicially estopped from asserting charges that could have been, but were not, included in its proof of claim filed in debtor’s previous bankruptcy case.
This document provides guidance on preparing for and taking depositions. It recommends thoroughly reviewing all case materials, including documents obtained through discovery and extra-judicially. It stresses the importance of speaking to clients, witnesses, and opposing counsel to learn all perspectives on the case. The document outlines goals for depositions, such as obtaining admissions, locking in testimony, and evaluating witnesses. It also provides tips on using the internet to research people, properties, and other case-related topics through public records, search engines, and maps.
Government’s response to defendant’s petition for review of magistrate’s repo...Cocoselul Inaripat
This document is the government's response to the defendant's petition for review of the magistrate's order denying bond and ordering pretrial detention. The government argues that the defendant has not demonstrated any new information warranting reopening of the detention hearing. It also argues the magistrate's findings that the defendant poses a flight risk were not clearly erroneous. The government asserts the defendant's petition should be denied.
Government’s response to defendant traian bujduveanu’s motion for severanceCocoselul Inaripat
This document is a response by the United States government opposing a motion for severance filed by defendant Traian Bujduveanu. Bujduveanu and co-defendant Hassan Saied Keshari were indicted for conspiracy to violate sanctions against Iran and export restrictions on arms. The government argues that severance is not warranted, as Bujduveanu fails to cite any specific statements or evidence that would unfairly prejudice him. Joinder of the defendants was proper under the rules as they were alleged to have participated in the same conspiracy. A joint trial is also presumed appropriate for co-conspirators.
This document summarizes a court case regarding whether expert testimony on the causal link between benzene exposure and acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) was properly excluded. Brian Milward alleged his APL was caused by workplace benzene exposure and offered expert Dr. Martyn Smith to establish general causation. The district court excluded Dr. Smith's testimony but the appellate court reversed, finding the testimony admissible. The appellate court reviewed the district court's application of the Daubert standard for reliability of expert testimony.
This document provides discovery materials to the defendants in a criminal case involving charges related to exporting aircraft parts to Iran. It includes:
1) CDs and images of computer data seized from the defendants containing emails and files.
2) Reports of post-arrest interviews of the two defendants.
3) Notification that physical documents and items seized can be inspected by the defendants, and copies of documents ordered.
4) A request for reciprocal discovery from the defendants and commitment to provide ongoing discovery required by law, including Brady and Giglio materials.
1) The document outlines the procedural history of the extradition request by the US against Julian Assange, including the charges in the second superseding indictment of 18 counts relating to conspiring to hack computers to obtain classified US defense information and publishing names that put individuals' safety at risk.
2) The charges include conspiracy, computer intrusion, and various counts of obtaining and disclosing national defense information unlawfully while aiding Chelsea Manning in accessing classified information from a protected computer network.
3) Assange is alleged to have published significant activity reports from wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as diplomatic cables containing names of individuals, putting them at risk, from 2010 to 2019. His defense disputes that the information har
BIA Remands of Immigration Judge William Cassidy 01/01/2014-05/26/2016Bryan Johnson
EOIR FOIA ID # 2016-23184. Also, see acknowledgment letter at following link: http://www.slideshare.net/abogadobryan/eoir-acknowledgment-letter-for-201623284
This document is a memorandum opinion and order from a United States District Court regarding a motion for summary judgment in a toxic exposure case. The plaintiffs, Gregory and Tammy Cripe, allege that Gregory Cripe suffered injuries from exposure to toxic adhesives at work. The defendants, Henkel Corporation and National Starch & Chemical, sought summary judgment on the grounds that the plaintiffs failed to properly disclose expert witnesses on causation, which is necessary to establish their claims of negligence and strict liability. The court found that the plaintiffs' sole disclosed expert, Dr. Patricia Robinson, was not qualified to testify on causation. Further, the plaintiffs' attempt to designate treating physicians as causation experts by attaching their medical records to Dr
This document is an order from a United States District Court regarding cross-motions for summary judgment in a case involving a plaintiff who was imprisoned at a halfway house operated by the defendant. The court provides background on the case, including that the plaintiff sued over alleged unlawful seizure of his property and constitutional violations. The court evaluates the motions using the standard for summary judgment, granting the defendant's motion and denying the plaintiff's motion.
BIA Remands of Immigration Judge Madline Garcia from 01/01/2014 to 05/26/2016Bryan Johnson
EOIR FOIA ID # 2016-23184. Also, see acknowledgment letter at following link: http://www.slideshare.net/abogadobryan/eoir-acknowledgment-letter-for-201623284
Business Law Multiple Choice Questions (Enter your answers on th.docxhumphrieskalyn
Business Law
Multiple Choice Questions (Enter your answers on the enclosed answer sheet)
1) The court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education had what effect on the decision
made in Plessy v. Ferguson?
a. It showed that precedent can be overruled and is not binding in every situation.
b. It applied the Doctrine of Stare Decisis.
c. It showed that the Constitution is not subject to interpretation.
d. It applied the principle of preemption.
e. It followed precedent.
2) Someone who believes that law is a reflection of those in power, believes in which
school of jurisprudential thought?
a. The Analytical School.
b. The Natural School.
c. The Command School.
d. The Historical School.
e. The Psychological School.
3) Which of the following is a false statement regarding the citizenship and immigration
policy of the United States?
a. Immigration quotas are different for each foreign country.
b. The first immigration quota policy was enacted in the 1920s.
c. The immigration quota policy was repealed after World War II.
d. There is an immigration quota policy in effect today in the United States.
e. Immigration laws are administered and enforced by the United States Customs and
Immigration Service.
4) The remedy, or relief, that was available in the law courts of England was:
a. specific performance.
b. monetary awards for damages.
c. fines and imprisonment.
d. returning the parties to their positions before the dispute arose.
e. Any of the above, and any other remedy determined to be fair in the particular case.
5) Chancery Courts were also known as:
a. Criminal Courts.
b. Equity Courts.
c. Legal Remedy Courts.
d. Merchant Courts.
e. Law Courts.
64
shapeType75fBehindDocument1pWrapPolygonVertices8;4;(21496,0);(0,0);(0,21487);(21496,21487)posrelh0posrelv0pib
Business Law
65
6) When statutes are organized by topic, the resulting compilation of law is known as:
a. precedent.
b. a code.
c. civil law.
d. topical presentation.
e. common law.
7) Which of the following is not empowered to establish administrative agencies?
a. A state executive branch.
b. Congress.
c. A federal or state judicial branch.
d. A state legislative branch.
e. The federal executive branch.
8) For which of the following in the U.S. Congress can the number to which a state is
entitled change over time?
a. All members of the u.s. Congress.
b. Senators.
c. Both Senators and representatives.
d. Neither senators nor representatives.
e. Representatives.
9) The power of the federal government to make treaties with Native American Nations
regarding land and land use is derived from the:
a. Privileges and Immunities Clause.
b. Supremacy Clause.
c. First Amendment.
d. Commerce Clause.
e. Equal Protection Clause.
10) If there is an area of interstate commerce that the federal government has chosen not
to regulate, the states can:
a. not regulate in that area because states cannot pass laws affecting interstate com-
merce.
b. ...
5Final ExaminationBCJ 240 Procedures in the Justice Sy.docxalinainglis
5
Final Examination
BCJ 240 Procedures in the Justice System
Multiple Choice Questions (Enter your answers on the enclosed answer sheet)
Typically, the lowest-level court(s) in a given state is/are: 1.
courts of general jurisdiction.a.
the state supreme court.b.
intermediate appellate courts.c.
courts of limited jurisdiction. d.
Each state has its own highest court, typically referred to as: 2.
superior courts.a.
intermediate appellate courts.b.
state supreme courts.c.
courts of limited jurisdiction. d.
At the federal level, the lowest-level trial court is referred to as: 3.
U.S. Supreme Court.a.
U. S. courts of appeals.b.
district courts.c.
trial courts. d.
When an appellate court reverses a lower court’s decision, it: 4.
nullifies or sets aside a trial verdict. a.
adjudicates the case.b.
sends the case to a higher court for reviewc.
sets the defendant free.d.
When an appellate court agrees with a lower court’s decision, it _____ that decision. 5.
reversesa.
affirmsb.
remandsc.
vacates d.
In order for a case to reach the Supreme Court, the court must decide whether it wants to 6.
hear the case. If the Supreme Court agrees that case is worth deciding, it issues what is
known as a:
lex loci.a.
jus cogens.b.
certiorari.c.
writ of certiorari.d.
6
Final Examination
BCJ 240 Procedures in the Justice System
Which of the following is NOT a reason a “bright-line” decision may be helpful? 7.
It promotes consistency.a.
It promotes clarity and predictability.b.
It is ambiguous. c.
It is subject to very little interpretation. d.
Police conduct that is considered reasonable by the police officer engaged in the conduct is 8.
referred to as:
subjective reasonableness.a.
objective reasonableness.b.
reasonable objectiveness.c.
unreasonable objectiveness. d.
The term “objective reasonableness” in criminal procedure refers to: 9.
what a single individual believes is reasonable.a.
what a reasonable person believes is reasonable.b.
what a jury believes is reasonable.c.
what a reasonable person would do or feel under the circumstances. d.
Judicial restraint refers to: 10.
limiting decisions to the facts of each case.a.
deciding cases based on additional, hypothetical situations.b.
interpreting complex legal issues.c.
relying on case law to determine outcomes. d.
The past Supreme Court requirement that a physical intrusion by authorities must have taken 11.
place to violate one’s privacy is referred to as the:
electronic communication protection doctrine.a.
privacy doctrine.b.
trespass doctrine.c.
physical protection doctrine. d.
7
Final Examination
BCJ 240 Procedures in the Justice System
In the Section 1983 context, the requirement that the plaintiff (i.e., the party suing) 12.
generally has to prove that the defendant officer intended for the violation to occur is
referred to as
liabilitya.
credibilityb.
accountability c.
culpability d.
.
406075RR The Foundations of Criminal Justice.docxwrite4
This document appears to be an exam for a course on the foundations of criminal justice. It consists of 25 multiple choice questions testing knowledge of key concepts and components of the US criminal justice system, including exceptions to the exclusionary rule, the role of the arraignment process, constitutional amendments that protect defendant rights, measurement of crime statistics, use of plea bargains, and biological and psychological theories of criminal behavior. The exam covers topics addressed in the course textbook such as costs of corporate crime, reasons the Supreme Court did not initially incorporate the Bill of Rights, and percentages of violent crimes unreported to police.
406075RR The Foundations of Criminal Justice.docxwrite12
This document appears to be an exam for a course on the foundations of criminal justice. It consists of 25 multiple choice questions testing knowledge of key concepts and components of the US criminal justice system, including exceptions to the exclusionary rule, the role and rights of defendants at different stages of the legal process such as arraignment, constitutional amendments that protect defendant rights, different types of crime data collection and measurements, plea bargains and other efficiency increasing measures, incorporation of the Bill of Rights, search and seizure allowances, prohibited punishments, requirements for arrest warrants, crime reporting rates, grounds for appeal, biological factors potentially related to criminal behavior, and theories of criminology including biocriminology.
POL 110 Enhance teaching - snaptutorial.comDavisMurphyA68
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
POL 110 Week 1 Discussion How Active Is Your Government
POL 110 Week 2 Discussion Does the need for national security conflict with our personal rights
Effectively Arguing Constitutional Speedy Trial Violations in Georgia Crimina...Ben Sessions
Georgia criminal defense attorney Ben Sessions discusses how to effectively present and argue motions to dismiss based upon constitutional speedy trial violations in Georgia.
BAM 521 Publisher Pearson Prentice Ha II Business Law .docxikirkton
BAM 521
Publisher:
Pearson Prentice Ha II
Business Law
Text: Contemporary Business and Online Commerce Law
Sixth Edition, 2009
ISBN: 10: 0-13-601500-X
Author(s):
Henry R. Cheeseman
shapeType75fBehindDocument1pWrapPolygonVertices8;4;(21498,0);(0,0);(0,21482);(21498,21482)posrelh0posrelv0pib
Business Law
Multiple Choice Questions (Enter your answers on the enclosed answer sheet)
1) The court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education had what effect on the decision
made in Plessy v. Ferguson?
a. It showed that precedent can be overruled and is not binding in every situation.
b. It applied the Doctrine of Stare Decisis.
c. It showed that the Constitution is not subject to interpretation.
d. It applied the principle of preemption.
e. It followed precedent.
2) Someone who believes that law is a reflection of those in power, believes in which
school of jurisprudential thought?
a. The Analytical School.
b. The Natural School.
c. The Command School.
d. The Historical School.
e. The Psychological School.
3) Which of the following is a false statement regarding the citizenship and immigration
policy of the United States?
a. Immigration quotas are different for each foreign country.
b. The first immigration quota policy was enacted in the 1920s.
c. The immigration quota policy was repealed after World War II.
d. There is an immigration quota policy in effect today in the United States.
e. Immigration laws are administered and enforced by the United States Customs and
Immigration Service.
4) The remedy, or relief, that was available in the law courts of England was:
a. specific performance.
b. monetary awards for damages.
c. fines and imprisonment.
d. returning the parties to their positions before the dispute arose.
e. Any of the above, and any other remedy determined to be fair in the particular case.
5) Chancery Courts were also known as:
a. Criminal Courts.
b. Equity Courts.
c. Legal Remedy Courts.
d. Merchant Courts.
e. Law Courts.
64
shapeType75fBehindDocument1pWrapPolygonVertices8;4;(21496,0);(0,0);(0,21482);(21496,21482)posrelh0posrelv0pib
Business Law
65
6) When statutes are organized by topic, the resulting compilation of law is known as:
a. precedent.
b. a code.
c. civil law.
d. topical presentation.
e. common law.
7) Which of the following is not empowered to establish administrative agencies?
a. A state executive branch.
b. Congress.
c. A federal or state judicial branch.
d. A state legislative branch.
e. The federal executive branch.
8) For which of the following in the U.S. Congress can the number to which a state is
entitled change over time?
a. All members of the U.S. Congress.
b. Senators.
c. Both Senators and representatives.
d. Neither senators nor representatives.
e. Representatives.
9) The power of the federal government to make treaties with Native American Nations
regarding land and land use is derived from the:
a. Privileges and Immunities Clause.
b. Sup ...
This document provides guidance on preparing for and conducting depositions. It discusses gathering documents and information in advance through discovery and interviews. It recommends talking to the client to understand the facts and potential witnesses, and talking to opposing counsel to understand their position without arguing your own case. The document outlines goals for depositions such as obtaining admissions, limiting testimony, and evaluating witnesses. It provides strategic advice such as having a structured plan and not volunteering extra information. The "Ten Commandments" section advises the client or deponent to listen carefully, answer only the question asked, and admit mistakes.
Final Examination2BAM 317 Business LawMultiple Cho.docxmydrynan
Final Examination
2
BAM 317 Business Law
Multiple Choice Questions (Enter your answers on the enclosed answer sheet)
1) Which doctrine was overturned in the case of Brown v. Board of Education?
a. the legality of poll taxes
b. the permissibility of separate but equal facilities
c. allowing only white males to vote
d. the acceptability of paying women less than men for comparable work
e. different working hours for male and female factory workers
2) Documents such as the U.S. Constitution, the Magna Carta, and the United Nations Charter
reflect what legal theory?
a. the Natural Law school
b. the Historical school
c. the Sociological school
d. the Analytical school
3) Proponents of which school(s) of jurisprudential thought are unlikely to adhere to precedent in
making decisions?
a. the Sociological school only
b. the Critical Legal Studies school only
c. both the Sociological school and the Critical Legal Studies school
d. neither the Sociological school nor the Critical Legal Studies school
4) Which of the following is most consistent with the Natural Law School of jurisprudence?
a. Law is based on moral and ethical principles of what are right, and it is the job of men
and women, through study, to discover what these principles are.
b. The law is a reflection of society, thus the law must change naturally as society
changes over time.
c. The laws of man are secondary to the laws of nature, and thus the laws of nature take
precedence whenever the laws of man are in conflict with the laws of nature.
d. By applying the rules of logic to specific cases, the logical, or natural, result will be
obtained.
e. Laws must first and foremost respect, preserve, and promote the preservation of the
environment and life in all its forms.
5) What was the only remedy (relief) available in the law courts of England?
a. specific performance
b. fines and imprisonment
c. monetary awards for damages
d. returning the parties to their positions before the dispute arose
3
Final Examination
BAM 317 Business Law
6) Which court was eventually combined with the regular court system?
a. law courts
b. equity courts
c. criminal courts
d. merchant courts
7) What is an equity court’s function?
a. To deal with just the law of merchants.
b. To issue opinions in cases that later set the precedent for similar cases.
c. To investigate the merits of a case and base its decisions on fairness.
d. To issue executive orders.
e. To set state or federal laws between two or more nations.
8) The ability of Native American Indians to conduct gambling operations on Indian reservations:
a. is determined solely by the respective Indian tribe
b. is determined through negotiation by the state and Native Americans
c.is within the control of the federal government because of provisions in the U.S. Consti-
tution
d. has been found by the courts, in many ins ...
Raphael: SOC 203 Criminology
Fieldwork Assignments
Your fieldwork assignments constitutes 30% of your final grade. The assignment is completed in
two stages. The first stage requires conducting three brief ethnographic observations (50%) and
the second stage requires one comparative ethnographic analysis (50%), following the rubrics
and writing composition processes provided. This assignment shows that students can critically
observe, collect, synthesize, and interpret data using a variety of analytic frameworks. It is
therefore the aim of this assignment to not only serve as the partial satisfaction of this course’s
requirements but also the opportunity to write a quality writing sample that can be used for
future employment or graduate study.
While it is recognized that students have other life commitments, producing college-level writing
is not something that ‘just happens.’ This assignment requires planning your time well and a
focused effort.
Stage One: Three Brief Ethnographies (50%)
Based upon your readings of Goffman and Blackboard selections on writing field notes, your
fieldwork assignment is to visit 2 different New York City courts and 1 Federal Court. Based
upon your notes and class discussions, you are required to report back your observations in
three 5-page papers; one for each court. You should plan to spend 2 to 3 hours on each
observation – the approximate length of either a morning session or afternoon session. Also,
keep in mind that all persons entering the courthouse must go through a magnetometer. Please
arrive in time to allow for security screening.
At anytime, the judge or other court officials might inquire about you observing. Remember to
identify yourself as a student. Most court hearings are public but some are closed for the
preservation of the rights of some parties. You can always slip into a different courtroom!
Rubric for Each Observation:
Introduction (1/2 page; introduce the problem; make sure to specify which court,
presiding Judge, type of hearings attending, etc.) (10 %)
Setting and Symbolism of the Court (1 page) (20 %)
The Ritualistic Elements of Interaction (1 page) (20 %)
The Story (2 pages; What happened/What is going on here?) (40 %)
Concluding Reflection (1/2 page; What do you think about this experience? / Bring it all
together!!!) (10 %)
Composition Process:
1. Perform Each Observation and Take Notes
2. Draft 1: Write Up Each Narrative Separately (Simply describe what happened!)
3. Draft 2: Perform Analysis (Apply relevant sociological concepts to your narrative!)
4. Visit Writing Center to Create Draft 3
5. Hand in Draft 3 Early to Receive Feedback (Optional)
6. Revise Draft 3 into Final Draft and Submit via SafeAssign!
Stage Two: A Comparative Ethnographic Analysis (50%)
Assess to what degree your own court observations are in line with Steve Bogira's observations
as presented in his book, Courtroom 302. B ...
Bankruptcy Attorney Houston | 09/09/2005 Special Session ActHelixSEO
Plaintiff Chapter 7 debtor filed a motion for summary judgment on his claim that defendant creditor should be judicially estopped from asserting charges that could have been, but were not, included in its proof of claim filed in debtor’s previous bankruptcy case.
This document provides guidance on preparing for and taking depositions. It recommends thoroughly reviewing all case materials, including documents obtained through discovery and extra-judicially. It stresses the importance of speaking to clients, witnesses, and opposing counsel to learn all perspectives on the case. The document outlines goals for depositions, such as obtaining admissions, locking in testimony, and evaluating witnesses. It also provides tips on using the internet to research people, properties, and other case-related topics through public records, search engines, and maps.
Sample request for judicial notice in United States District CourtLegalDocsPro
This sample request for judicial notice in United States District Court is pursuant to Rule 201 of the Federal Rules of Evidence and requests that the court judicial notice of certain specified adjudicative facts. The sample is available for free download in Microsoft Word format, includes brief instructions and can be easily modified. The author is an entrepreneur and freelance paralegal that has worked in California and Federal litigation since 1995 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided.
POL 110 Week 1 Discussion How Active Is Your Government
POL 110 Week 2 Discussion Does the need for national security conflict with our personal rights
POL 110 Week 3 Discussion Is Federalism Necessary?"
POL 110 Week 4 Discussion The Ideologies of American Politics
POL 110 Week 5 Discussion The Two-Party System
POL 110 Week 6 Discussion Voting and the Role of Interest Groups
The document provides information about the US judiciary system through a series of multiple choice questions and explanations. It covers topics like the Supreme Court's jurisdiction, nomination process, criteria for accepting cases, amicus briefs, and the relative levels of activism of different Chief Justices. The Warren Court is identified as the most activist in expanding civil rights, while the Rehnquist Court advocated more judicial restraint. Critics of each approach favor courts that align with their views on the judiciary's role in policymaking.
Pol 110 Massive Success / snaptutorial.comReynolds26
POL 110 Week 1 Discussion How Active Is Your Government
POL 110 Week 2 Discussion Does the need for national security conflict with our personal rights
POL 110 Week 3 Discussion Is Federalism Necessary?"
POL 110 Week 4 Discussion The Ideologies of American Politics
POL 110 RANK Become Exceptional--pol110rank.comshanaabe71
This document provides an overview of the course content for POL 110 Entire Course. It lists the weekly discussion topics, assignments, exams, and key concepts covered for each week of the course, including discussions on the roles of government, federalism, political ideologies, Congress, elections, and the court system. The document also provides the exam questions for Weeks 4 and 8.
The document discusses the U.S. court system, including state and federal structures. It explains that state courts have general jurisdiction over most cases within a state, while federal courts have more limited jurisdiction, primarily over federal questions and diversity cases. It also distinguishes between law and equity, noting that law aims for stability and damages, while equity promotes fairness through remedies like decrees.
Crmj 410 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.comStephenson53
C H A P T E R 3 Constitutional Limitations on the Prohibition of Criminal Conduct
1. Can you think of an example of an ex post facto law?
3. Can a municipality enforce an ordinance totally banning religious organizations from canvassing neighborhoods in search of new members? What about an ordinance that prohibits such canvassing between the
Assignment 4BAnswer SheetPlease post the completed answer sh.docxssuser562afc1
Assignment 4B
Answer Sheet
Please post the completed answer sheet as an attachment through the Assignments section.
YOUR NAME:
Question
Number
Your Answer (Letter Only)
Question Number
Your Answer (Letter Only)
Question Number
Your Answer (Letter Only)
1
31
61
2
32
62
3
33
63
4
34
64
5
35
65
6
36
7
37
8
38
9
39
10
40
11
41
12
42
13
43
14
44
15
45
16
46
17
47
18
48
19
49
20
50
21
51
22
52
23
53
24
54
25
55
26
56
27
57
28
58
29
59
30
60
Assignment 4B
Use the answer sheet to respond to the following questions. When completed, post your answer
sheet as an attachment through the Assignments section. There is one correct answer per
question, and each answer is worth two points.
Example:
Which amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures?
a) First Amendment
b) Fourth Amendment
c) Fifth Amendment
d) Sixth Amendment
e) None of the above.
The correct answer is "B," so you would enter "B" on the answer sheet for this assignment. One
point would be awarded for this question as the question was answered correctly.
1. The prosecutor's discretion in determining which cases to prosecute impacts what laws the
police choose to focus on and enforce.
a) True
b) False
2. According to the text, an important role played by the victim is
a. to humanize the impact of crime.
b. to offer unbiased, reliable testimony.
c. to point out inconsistencies in the defense.
d. to pressure the jury to find the defendant guilty.
e. none of the above.
3. When making decisions in the courtroom, judges
a) must refrain from seeking the advice of others in order to protect the rights of the
accused.
b) rely on prosecutors and defense attorneys during essentially every phase of the trial.
c) typically disregard information from other judges as each case is different.
d) have little discretion in most decisions affecting cases.
e) none of the above.
4. The police chief implements the use of a drug courier profile for his department. Using the
profile, officers focus on their attention on stopping and searching cars with Florida license
plates. After a month, the chief reviews the statistics and finds that, indeed, most of the drug
arrests for the month were of drivers of cars with Florida license plates. According to the text,
this is an example of:
a. racial profiling.
b. self-fulfilling prophecy.
c. differential policing.
d. targeted enforcement.
e. none of the above.
5. Which of the following is not a white collar crime?
a. A stockbroker manipulates the price of a stock.
b. A car company sells vehicles it knows have a faulty brake system.
c. A manufacturing plant dumps toxic waste into a local creek.
d. A businessman shoplifts a tie from a prestige clothing store.
e. None of the above.
6. A subpoe ...
Similar to Cjs 251 Enhance teaching-snaptutorial.com (20)
it describes the bony anatomy including the femoral head , acetabulum, labrum . also discusses the capsule , ligaments . muscle that act on the hip joint and the range of motion are outlined. factors affecting hip joint stability and weight transmission through the joint are summarized.
This document provides an overview of wound healing, its functions, stages, mechanisms, factors affecting it, and complications.
A wound is a break in the integrity of the skin or tissues, which may be associated with disruption of the structure and function.
Healing is the body’s response to injury in an attempt to restore normal structure and functions.
Healing can occur in two ways: Regeneration and Repair
There are 4 phases of wound healing: hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling. This document also describes the mechanism of wound healing. Factors that affect healing include infection, uncontrolled diabetes, poor nutrition, age, anemia, the presence of foreign bodies, etc.
Complications of wound healing like infection, hyperpigmentation of scar, contractures, and keloid formation.
Leveraging Generative AI to Drive Nonprofit InnovationTechSoup
In this webinar, participants learned how to utilize Generative AI to streamline operations and elevate member engagement. Amazon Web Service experts provided a customer specific use cases and dived into low/no-code tools that are quick and easy to deploy through Amazon Web Service (AWS.)
How to Setup Warehouse & Location in Odoo 17 InventoryCeline George
In this slide, we'll explore how to set up warehouses and locations in Odoo 17 Inventory. This will help us manage our stock effectively, track inventory levels, and streamline warehouse operations.
Gender and Mental Health - Counselling and Family Therapy Applications and In...PsychoTech Services
A proprietary approach developed by bringing together the best of learning theories from Psychology, design principles from the world of visualization, and pedagogical methods from over a decade of training experience, that enables you to: Learn better, faster!
How to Make a Field Mandatory in Odoo 17Celine George
In Odoo, making a field required can be done through both Python code and XML views. When you set the required attribute to True in Python code, it makes the field required across all views where it's used. Conversely, when you set the required attribute in XML views, it makes the field required only in the context of that particular view.
1. CJS 251 Entire Course
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
CJS 251 Week 1 Court History and Purpose Paper
CJS 251 Week 1 Quiz
CJS 251 Week 2 Courtroom Participant Chart
CJS 251 Week 2 Quiz
CJS 251 Week 3 Courtroom TV Paper
CJS 251 Week 3 Quiz
CJS 251 Week 4 Emerging Issues and Challenges Presentation
CJS 251 Week 4 Quiz
CJS 251 Week 5 Restorative Justice Paper
CJS 251 Week 5 Quiz
*******************************************************
CJS 251 Week 1 Court History and Purpose
Paper
For more classes visit
2. www.snaptutorial.com
Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper in which you examine and evaluate
the American criminal court system. Address the following in your
paper:
• Describe a court and its purpose.
• Define the dual court system.
• Describe the role that early legal codes, the common law, and
precedent played in the development of courts.
• Identify the role of courts in criminal justice today.
Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
*******************************************************
CJS 251 Week 1 Quiz
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Week 1 Quiz: Chapters 1, 3 and 4
1) The earliest known example of a formal written legal code was the
__________.
1. A) Declaration of Independence
2. B) Code of Hammurabi
3. C) Retributive Code of Romans
4. D) U.S. Constitution
3. 2) This type of remedy requires one party to perform certain acts or
refrain from certain actions.
1. A) monetary damages
2. B) judicial discretion
3. C) habeas corpus
4. D) injunctive relief
3) __________ due process is concerned with protecting people’s life,
liberty, and property rights.
1. A) Procedural
2. B) Preventative
3. C) Secondary
4. D) Substantive
4) The law that emerged from the first meeting of Congress was the
__________.
1. A) Articles of Confederation
2. B) Federal Judiciary Act of 1891
3. C) Federal Judiciary Act of 1789
4. D) Congressional Judiciary Act of 1788
5) Currently, just __________ of the federal district courts’ caseload
is criminal; the rest of the cases they decide are civil.
1. A) 20%
2. B) 15%
3. C) 35%
4. D) 25%
6) The federal court system is comprised of __________ tiers of
courts.
1. A) three
2. B) one
4. 3. C) two
4. D) four
7) The total incoming trial caseload for lower state courts exceeds
over __________ in any given year.
1. A) 500,000,000
2. B) 100,000,000
3. C) 200,000,000
4. D) 50,000,000
8) Appeals from limited jurisdiction courts usually go before the
general jurisdiction courts as a new trial, known as a __________.
1. A) adjournment
2. B) en banc trial
3. C) trial de novo
4. D) caseflow management
9) During the colonial period, most political authority rested with
__________ who were appointed by the king of England.
1. A) village leaders
2. B) public commissioners
3. C) high chancellors
4. D) governors
10) The term used to describe the sharing of judicial power between
the states and the federal government.
1. A) judicial federalism
2. B) judicial synergism
3. C) judicial leverage
4. D) judicial collaboration
*******************************************************
CJS 251 Week 2 Courtroom Participant Chart
5. For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Complete the University of Phoenix Material: Courtroom Participant
Chart.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
In order to get full credit on this assignment, every box must contain
at least 100 words.
*******************************************************
CJS 251 Week 2 Quiz
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Week 2 Quiz: Chapters 7, 8, 9, 10 and 13
1) Per __________, Section 2 of the Constitution, federal judges are
appointed by the president with the advice and consent of the Senate.
1. A) Article I
2. B) Article IV
3. C) Article III
4. D) Article II
6. 2) The __________ Amendment guarantees criminal defendants the
right to trial by an impartial judge.
1. A) Fourteenth
2. B) Fifth
3. C) Tenth
4. D) Eighth
3) The __________ is the chief local prosecutor at the county level.
1. A) District Attorney
2. B) U.S. Attorney General
3. C) General Prosecutor
4. D) Solicitor General
4) __________ is an approach intended to improve cooperation and
collaboration between prosecutors and individuals outside the
criminal justice system.
1. A) Community prosecution
2. B) Social norm prosecution
3. C) Neighborhood prosecution
4. D) Community policing
5) Conviction rates for indigent defendants and those with their own
lawyers were about the same in Federal and State courts. About
__________% of Federal defendants and __________% of the
defendants in the most populous counties were found guilty regardless
of the type of their attorneys.
1. A) 80, 60
2. B) 90, 75
3. C) 50, 35
4. D) 100, 100
7. 6) The first public defender program in the United States opened in
__________ in 1913.
1. A) Providence
2. B) New York City
3. C) Boston
4. D) Los Angeles
7) In __________, the Court extended the right to counsel to
misdemeanor cases.
1. A) Gideon v. Wainwright
2. B) Powell v. Alabama
3. C) Betts v. Brady
4. D) Argersinger v. Hamlin
8) The __________ Amendment provides that no person “shall be
compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.”
1. A) Sixth
2. B) Fifth
3. C) Fourteenth
4. D) Twelfth
9) The right to a jury trial has always been recognized in the federal
courts, but this right was not extended to the states until 1968 in the
case of __________.
1. A) Patton v. United States
2. B) McKeiver v. Pennsylvania
3. C) Ristaino v. Ross
4. D) Duncan v. Louisiana
10) The appropriate size for a jury is anywhere between __________
and __________ members.
1. A) six, sixteen
8. 2. B) four, sixteen
3. C) six , twelve
4. D) two, twelve
*******************************************************
CJS 251 Week 3 Courtroom TV Paper
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Research the Internet and find a celebrated criminal prosecution case
to analyze, such as a criminal case that received media attention. This
case must have proceeded to trial; it cannot have been plea bargained
or dismissed before the trial phase.
Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper in which you address the following
questions:
• Summarize the criminal procedures that occurred in this case,
from arrest through appeal, if applicable.
• What was the crime the defendant was alleged to have
committed? What are the elements of that crime? Is there
sufficient evidence to believe the defendant guilty of this crime
beyond a reasonable doubt? Explain.
• Identify the legal defenses used in this case. Explain what the
defense entails and if it is viable.
• Based on the evidence, should, or did, the defense apply to
either exonerate the defendant or reduce his sentence?
Format your answers consistent with APA guidelines.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
*******************************************************
CJS 251 Week 3 Quiz
9. For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Week 3 Quiz: Chapters 11, 12 and 13
1) A(n) __________ occurs after the police develop probable cause
that the suspect committed a crime and/or they obtain an arrest
warrant issued by a judicial magistrate.
1. A) bail setting
2. B) arrest
3. C) trial
4. D) conviction
2) The __________ is formally defined as the requirement that
evidence obtained in violation of the Constitution during an illegal
arrest, search, or other process, cannot be used in a criminal trial.
1. A) self-incrimination
2. B) exclusionary rule
3. C) 80/20
4. D) unreasonable search and seizure
3) A(n) __________ is a written accusation submitted to the court by
a prosecutor, alleging that a specified person(s) has committed a
specified offense.
1. A) information
2. B) conviction bill
3. C) indictment
4. D) grant of immunity
10. 4) The __________ Amendment states that “excessive bail shall not
be required.”
1. A) Fourth
2. B) Second
3. C) Fourteenth
4. D) Eighth
5) In 1975, the state of __________ banned the practice of plea
bargaining.
1. A) North Dakota
2. B) Oklahoma
3. C) New Hampshire
4. D) Alaska
6) The decision from __________ continues to hold great importance.
Today it serves to protect even the lowest-level offender from corrupt
or manipulative practices by over-zealous prosecutors.
1. A) Brady v. United States
2. B) United States v. Goodwin
3. C) Edwards v. People
4. D) Santobello v. New York
7) Cases referencing plea agreements go all the way back to the
__________ century.
1. A) 19th
2. B) 14th
3. C) 18th
4. D) 12th
8) __________ occurs when a defendant agrees to plead guilty in
exchange for a less serious sentence.
11. 1. A) Nolo contendre
2. B) Charge bargaining
3. C) Sentence bargaining
4. D) Plea acceptance
9) The __________ Amendment states, in part, that the “accused shall
enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the
state.”
1. A) Fifth
2. B) Fourth
3. C) Second
4. D) Sixth
10) Voir dire typically begins with the __________ asking questions
concerning potential jurors’ familiarity with the case, attitudes toward
one or other party to the case, demographic information, and so on.
1. A) judge
2. B) defense attorney
3. C) jury consultant
4. D) prosecutor
*******************************************************
CJS 251 Week 4 Emerging Issues and
Challenges Presentation
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Choose one of the following topics:
12. • Juvenile court process and specialized courts
• Women and minorities in the court
• Causes of wrongful conviction
• Technology in the courtroom
Prepare an 8- to 12-slide presentation that explains the topic.
Include statistics, contemporary examples, and scholarly sources in
your presentation.
Arrange the information in a visually appealing manner by selecting
an appropriate background design and by balancing short, bulleted
phrases with complementary images.
Include all references in the notes section for each slide
Format your presentation consistent with APA guidelines.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
*******************************************************
CJS 251 Week 4 Quiz
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Week 4 Quiz: Chapters 5, 6, 15, and 16
1) A(n) __________ is when a decision is made whether a case
should enter the juvenile justice system or be terminated without
further action.
1. A) judicial decision
2. B) judicial disposition
3. C) detention
4. D) intake
2) The term __________ refers to trying juveniles as adults.
13. 1. A) concurrent jurisdiction
2. B) adjudication hearing
3. C) legislative exclusion
4. D) juvenile waiver
3) This allows juvenile court judges to commit a juvenile to a
correctional facility beyond the age of 18.
1. A) reverse waiver
2. B) extended jurisdiction
3. C) blended sentence
4. D) concurrent jurisdiction
4) So-called __________ , or problem-solving courts, include drug
courts, domestic violence courts, and teen courts among others.
1. A) traditional courts
2. B) specialized courts
3. C) adjudication courts
4. D) special jurisdictional courts
5) Goldstein’s concept of __________ was influential due to its
concern with developing custom-tailored solutions to specific types of
crime problems.
1. A) custom-solution policing
2. B) problem-oriented policing
3. C) broken-windows policing
4. D) ends-justification policing
6) The decision in the case of __________ defined an articulable
standards for the conduct of warrantless stop-and-frisk searches.
1. A) Furman v. Georgia
14. 2. B) Terry v. Ohio
3. C) Chicago v. Morales
4. D) Roberts v. Louisiana
7) At the top of the wedding cake model, the smallest layer, are
__________.
1. A) misdemeanors
2. B) felonies
3. C) celebrated cases
4. D) serial murder cases
8) The __________ decision was far-reaching. It brought executions
to a halt and “emptied death rows across the country.”
1. A) Furman v. Georgia
2. B) Terry v. Ohio
3. C) Mapp v. Ohio
4. D) Gregg v. Georgia
9) __________ refers to any means of settling disputes outside the
courtroom.
1. A) Alternative dispute resolution
2. B) Deposition
3. C) Arbitration
4. D) Mediation
10) The Federal Judicial Center has stated __________ technologies
use devices such as integrated lecterns and electronic whiteboards in
the courtroom.
1. A) level-two
2. B) level-four
3. C) level-three
4. D) level-one
15. *******************************************************
CJS 251 Week 5 Quiz
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
Week 5 Quiz: Chapter 14
1) Probation is one of the most frequent sentences handed down by
judges – there are now more than __________ million people on
probation.
1. A) eight
2. B) ten
3. C) four
4. D) one
2) __________ circumstances are those that reduce the seriousness or
outrageousness of a given crime.
1. A) Aggravated
2. B) Modifying
3. C) Auxillary
4. D) Mitigating
3) The __________ Amendment expressly states that the right to
counsel applies in criminal prosecutions.
1. A) Fourth
2. B) Eighth
16. 3. C) Sixth
4. D) Second
4) In __________, the Court held that a defendant’s appeal of a
preadjudication order denying him dismissal of his indictment on
double jeopardy grounds was permissible.
1. A) Kotteakos v. United States
2. B) Carroll v. United States
3. C) DiBella v. United States
4. D) Abney v. United States
5) Day fines were introduced by __________ in the 1920s.
1. A) Great Britain
2. B) the United States
3. C) West Germany
4. D) Sweden
6) __________ is the most common punishment used by the criminal
justice system today.
1. A) Boot camp
2. B) A fine
3. C) Overnight detention
4. D) Forfeiture
7) In __________, the Court concluded that the test for constitutional
harmless error is requiring the prosecution to prove “beyond a
reasonable doubt” that the error complained of did not contribute to
the verdict obtained.
1. A) North Carolina v. Pierce
2. B) Chapman v. California
3. C) Ford v. Wainwright
17. 4. D) Kotteakos v. United States
8) The seizure , resulting from a criminal court proceeding, of money,
negotiable instruments, securities, property, or other things of value
that was derived from or was used to facilitate a crime or criminal
activity is known as __________.
1. A) criminal forfeiture
2. B) search and seizure
3. C) civil forfeiture
4. D) intermediate sanction
9) __________ consists of a planned intervention intended to change
behavior.
1. A) Incapacitation
2. B) Retribution
3. C) Rehabilitation
4. D) Deterrence
10) With a __________ sentence, the defendant serves time for two
crimes at the same time.
1. A) consecutive
2. B) concurrent
3. C) congruent
D) continuing
*******************************************************
CJS 251 Week 5 Restorative Justice Paper
For more classes visit
www.snaptutorial.com
18. Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper to the community explaining the
restorative justice process. Include the following in your paper:
• Explain the process of restorative justice and why it is used in
the criminal justice system.
• Explain how the damage of a crime can go beyond the
immediate victim.
• Describe how the restorative justice process differs from
contemporary criminal justice processes.
• Reflect on how the restorative justice process can benefit the
offender, the victim and the community.
Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
Click the Assignment Files tab to submit your assignment.
*******************************************************