Civil War 2 7th Issue Infowars Magazine

We haVe no clue who This Guy iS
the world’s most private search engine
STARTPAGE.COM
At Startpage.com, we don't collect any
personal information on our users. Nada.
Zilch. Zero.
We don't store your IP address, we don't
capture your location and we don't record
your searches
That's important, because those other
guys use their search engine to learn
more about you -- a whole lot more. In
fact, every time you do a search, they take
the juicy details you provide and add
them to your bulging personal profile.
It's shocking to realize that millions of
people, including well-informed,
liberty-loving activists, fall into the search
engine traps each time they log onto the
"global brain" to ask a question.
At Startpage, that's not how we do
things. We believe you have the right to
search for information anonymously,
without anyone watching. Our zero
data-collection policy and full SSL encryp-
tion is your assurance that nobody's
looking over your shoulder, no matter what
you search for.
Startpage.com
Say goodbye to the watchers and make
the switch today. Your freedom will thank
you for it.
THE WORLD’S MOST PRIVATE SEARCH ENGINE

Celebrities and Gun Rights
Who makes more sense? Bruce Willis or Chris Rock?
When celebrities open their mouths the world listens. With two celebrities
talking about gun control in the media today, it is interesting to take a peek
and find out if either of them makes any sense.
Steve Watson
It happened Here
The evidence of a police state that already exists.
Paul Craig Roberts
Semi Auto Confiscation Plans
Proposed in California
California lawmakers are proposing an anti-second amendment
law that will rival the one recently passed in New York
Kurt Nimmo
RadioActive Silverware
Radioactive scrap metal imports on the rise, guess what gets
manufactured with it
DHS is set to purchase a furhter
21.6 million rounds of ammunition
This adds to the 1.6 billion bullets they have already obtained
over the course of the last 10 months
Paul Joseph Watson
After the Tribulation
New Movie Review
Adan Salazar
Six Year Old Girl Expelled
For Bringing Plastic Toy Gun to Show and Tell
Steve Watson
Civil War 2Why the Elite Would Lose a Civil War. Every indication clearly suggests that
authorities in the U.S. are preparing for widespread civil unrest.
Alex Jones
18
20
39
36
40
22
10
34
12
Declaration of Independence 2.0.
Restoring the Republic.A look back at when Alex Jones called for a second American Revolution led by states who would reconstitute the
Republic under the terms of the Declaration of Independence, bill of rights and constitution.
Paul Joseph Watson

JOIN OR DIE
Poster
CROSSWORD
PUZZLE
Dave Mivshek
What’s Behind the Punishment for
Fake Guns in Schools?
Should we assume that because cops and school officials can’t stop
real crimes, they’re settling for stopping fake crimes?
Paul Joseph Watson
NY Street Body Scanners
Machines violate Fourth Amendment, and can
“unzip” DNA, according to studies
Steve Watson
Secret Virus
We know that GMO consumption has been linked to a host of serious
conditions, but one thing we are not so sure about is the recent
discovery of a hidden viral gene deep within genetically modified crops
Anthony Gucciardi50
30 58
42
46
54
CIVIL WAR 2: INSIDE THE MIND OF THE ESTABLISHMENT
ARTIST PROFILE
Moonshiner
6th Graders Asked to Design
“Communist” Flag
Curriculum used in 70 percent of school districts in
Texas labeled “mind control”
Paul Joseph Watson45
38
How Comb
Congress Can Cut Their Hair to the Tune of 5.1 Million Taxpayer-
Dollars But Can’t Cut Their Budget?
Donna Anderson

Anthony Gucciardi
Paul Craig Roberts

8 www.infowars.com8 www.infowars.com
“Now who’s your daddy, Ms.
and Mr. America???”
Christian Schaper
“The only time I would ever
consider using this weapon
would be to convince my boss
to keep my failure of a show
on the air. Every one of my 14
viewers would agree.”
Cade Ingram
Fort Worth, Texas
“Piss on your Constitution you
twits!”
Luke Harmon
“The name’s guns.
Piers, Moreguns.”
Alex
“I don’t always support the
Second Amendment, but when
I do I use an ‘assault rifle’”
Anonymous

10 www.infowars.com
R
adio host Alex Jones has
called for a second Ameri-
can Revolution led by states,
who would secede from the
federal government and re-
constitute the Republic un-
der the terms of the Decla-
ration of Independence, Bill
of Rights and Constitution.
The call for Americans to
rally behind a restoration of
the Republic and the Bill of
Rights comes on the back of a burgeoning secessionist
movement that has swept the country with residents
from all 50 states submitting petitions to the White
House calling for states to withdraw from the union
and form their own independent governments. The pe-
titions have received a combined number of signatures
totaling over a million.
During a nationwide broadcast Nov. 16, 2012, Jones
laid out the battle plan for secession, emphasizing that
states must first secede from the federal government,
which has gone rogue, and then use the terms of the
Declaration of Independence to restore the Republic,
not create a new country.
Jones stressed that he was calling for a cultural resto-
ration in the spirit of the Bill of Rights – a newly unified
America under the Constitution – and not a violent over-
throw, noting that it was the states that created the Con-
stitution and the federal government in the first place.
Jones noted that the only course to restoring liberty
was clear – “To follow the founding document of the
Republic, the Declaration of Independence, wherein it
is clearly stated that it is the right and the duty of the
American people, when their government becomes de-
structive and tyrannical, to abolish and reconstitute it
in a form that protects our liberties.”
“We are not calling for secession to form new sep-
arate countries, we are calling for secession because
the states created the Constitution, Bill of Rights and
federal government, and the federal government itself
has been hijacked by foreign special interests – mainly
banking cartels,” said Jones.
“I am calling for people to be educated about how we
can secede to restore the Republic,” said Jones, warn-
ing that the media was attempting to characterize the
entire movement as a plot to bring down America when
in fact America has already been captured and taken
over by the political and financial elite.
“This is the states putting their foot down and say-
ing we are going to reconstitute the federal govern-
ment under the Bill of Rights and Constitution, we’re
going to kick out the bureaucrats, the lobbyists, the
foreign criminals, and the Federal Reserve who have
taken over,” explained Jones.
The radio host also put the call out for Congressman
Ron Paul to head up such a movement and utilize his
vast network of grass roots liberty-loving activists to
lead the charge, as well as using his contacts in each
state to begin the process of secession in the legislature.
Harvard constitutional law scholar and adviser to
Ron Paul, Edwin Viera, appeared on the syndicated ra-
dio broadcast and agreed with Alex Jones’ constitution-
al battle plan, with the Declaration of Independence as
the centerpiece of legal authority.
Ron Paul’s former congressional chief of staff and
founder of the Von Mises institute, Lew Rockwell, also
appeared on the special broadcast and concurred with
Jones’ strategy that now is the time to launch our offen-
sive and restore the Republic.
The right of the people to reconstitute their govern-
ment if it becomes oppressive and onerous is clearly
outlined in the Declaration of Independence.
“That to secure these rights, Governments are insti-
tuted among Men, deriving their just powers from the
consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of
Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the
Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to in-
stitute new Government, laying its foundation on such
principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to
them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and

www.prisonplanet.com 11
Happiness,” reads the Preamble, Declaration of Inde-
pendence, July 4, 1776.
In the aftermath of petitions from all 50 states to
secede being posted on the White House website and
signed by over a million Americans, the secessionist
movement has been portrayed as anti-American, un-
patriotic and even treasonous. In reality, as Ron Paul
has emphasized, it is as American as apple pie and
George Washington.
The most popular petition out of all 50 that have been
posted on the White House website applies to Texas
and reads as follows;
“The U.S. continues to suffer economic difficulties
stemming from the federal government’s neglect to
reform domestic and foreign spending. The citizens of
the U.S. suffer from blatant abuses of their rights such
as the NDAA, the TSA, etc. Given that the state of Texas
maintains a balanced budget and is the 15th largest
economy in the world, it is practically feasible for Texas
to withdraw from the union, and to do so would pro-
tect it’s citizens’ standard of living and re-secure their
rights and liberties in accordance with the original
ideas and beliefs of our founding fathers which are no
longer being reflected by the federal government.”
The call for states to secede from the union, one now
backed by over a million Americans, is part of a wid-
er disenfranchisement with how the country has been
infested and hijacked by a crony political elite and the
principles of the founders decimated.
As more than one million Americans express their
disenfranchisement with the federal government by
supporting a secessionist movement that has spread
like wildfire, it is time to call for a new declaration of
independence and a new commitment to restore the
Republic in the face of an enemy that has subverted
America from within.
The United States government has been seized by
domestic and foreign banking cartels. This fact is so
transparently obvious that talking heads on CNBC
now laugh about it.
While Americans are being told to brace for tax hikes,
spending cuts and a myriad of other austerity mea-
sures, the Federal Reserve has been sending trillions of
dollars to foreign banks.
The federal government is supposed to represent the
states, but it doesn’t, it represents the interests of the
political and banking elite who themselves have no al-
legiance whatsoever to America.
Infowars is calling on patriots to start a movement
to draft Ron Paul as the head of a brand new effort
to restore the Republic, restore the Bill of Rights and
opt out of the counterfeit America the banking elite has
subverted and fashioned to serve their own interests.
The establishment media is already demonizing the
secessionist movement as a rag-tag group of fringe
kooks and paranoid racists, when in reality as the Dai-
ly Caller uncovered, it is comprised of former Marines,
parents, business owners and ordinary mechanics.
Meanwhile, Obama supporters and other statists
have called on the government to punish those putting
their signatures to the secession petitions by having
them stripped of their citizenship, deported and exiled.
It’s time to re-assert the narrative on secession and
put it in its proper context, which is not an infantile
reaction to the fact that Barack Obama won the elec-
tion, but an expression of extreme uneasiness at the
direction in which the country is heading, a wide-
spread discontent that has been ongoing for long be-
fore Obama even took office, and a new commitment
calling on states to nullify unconstitutional laws and
regulations and secede from the increasingly tyranni-
cal federal government.
In Ron Paul’s Congressional farewell speech, he skew-
ered authoritarianism in all its forms and captured the
true spirit of liberty which should drive the movement
to secede from the federal government and reconstitute
America under the Declaration of Independence.
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and a writer for In-
fowars.com and PrisonPlanet.com. He is the author of
“Order Out Of Chaos,” and also a host of the Infowars
Nightly News.
writtenby PaulJosephWatson

12 www.infowars.com
There is a crucial economic imperative as to why the elite is
seeking to engineer and exploit social unrest.
As respected investigative reporter Greg Palast exposed in 2001,
the global banking elite, namely the World Bank and the IMF,
have honed a technique that has allowed them to asset-strip nu-
merous other countries in the past – that technique has come to be
known at the “IMF riot.”
In April 2001, Palast obtained leaked World Bank documents
that outlined a four step process on how to loot nations of their
wealth and infrastructure, placing control of resources into the
hands of the banking elite.
One of the final steps of the process, the “IMF riot,” detailed how
the elite would plan for mass civil unrest ahead of time that would
have the effect of scaring off investors and causing government
bankruptcies.
“This economic arson has its bright side – for foreigners, who
can then pick off remaining assets at fire sale prices,” writes Pa-
last, adding, “A pattern emerges. There are lots of losers but the
clear winners seem to be the western banks and US Treasury.”
In other words, the banking elite creates the very economic en-
vironment – soaring interest rates, spiraling food prices, poverty,
lower standards of living – that precipitates civil unrest – and then
like a vulture swoops down to devour what remains of the coun-
try’s assets on the cheap.
We have already seen this process unfold in places like Bolivia,
Ecuador, Indonesia, Greece and Argentina. Next on the chopping
block are Spain, Italy, Britain and France – all of which have seen
widespread riots over the last two years.
As Ha-Joon Chang explains in the Guardian, the roots of Eu-
rope’s riots were sparked by “governments inflicting an old-IMF-
style programme on their own populations,” namely the same pro-
grams of “austerity, privatisation and deregulation,” that caused
the riots of the 80′s and 90′s in poorer countries.
Although the likes of the IMF and the World Bank have pillaged
half of the globe with their economic terrorism, America remains
the ultimate prize. The first step of the four step process for bank-
ster seizure of a country – privatization of state-owned assets – is
already well under way in America, with infrastructure being sold
off to foreign corporations, with the aid of Goldman Sachs, at a
frightening pace.
A key component of the banking elite’s insidious agenda to bring
about an economic collapse in America by design also centers
around the process of de-industrializing the country, eviscerat-
ing the nation’s platform for self-sufficiency and replacing it with
dependence on banker bailouts. This has already been largely
achieved in Europe – with just about every major economy on the
continent run by Goldman Sachs-affiliated technocrats.
In the United States, 32 per cent of manufacturing jobs have been
lost since 2000, while 56,000 manufacturing facilities have been
mothballed since 2001. The Obama administration has also de-
clared war on the coal industry, with Obama himself promising to
“bankrupt” anyone who tries to build a new coal plant. Meanwhile,
China builds a new coal plant every two weeks.
Given the clear economic motive for stirring unrest in the United
States, we’d expect to see preparations for domestic disorder in
numerous different guises – and indeed the signs are everywhere.
Everyindication clearlysuggeststhatauthorities inthe United
States are preparing forwidespread civil unrest.Thistrend has
not emerged by accident – it is part of a tried and tested method
used bythe banking eliteto seize control of nations, stripthem
oftheir assets and absorbthem intothe newworld order.
WHY THE BANKING ELIT

National Defense
Authorization Act
The Obama administration’s passage of NDAA leg-
islation that authorizes kidnapping and indefinite de-
tention without trial of American citizens on U.S. soil
serves to create the framework for mass arrests of pro-
testers and journalists in a time of declared national
emergency.
Obama’s War on
Whistleblowers
The Obama administration’s brazen and aggres-
sive prosecution of whistleblowers for divulging gov-
ernment corruption in the public interest is clearly a
device designed to intimidate whistleblowers from
speaking out when the proverbial hits the fan.
Spying on Social Media
for Signs of Unrest
The Department of Homeland Security and other fed-
eral agencies are actively engaged in spying on social
media as well as news websites to look for reports or
comments that “reflect adversely on the U.S. govern-
ment and the DHS.” The government is on the lookout
for the ‘tipping point’ when heated online rhetoric spills
onto the streets in the form of unrest.
Building Huge Spy Centers
to Track Unrest
The NSA is building the country’s biggest spy cen-
ter in the middle of the Utah desert. The purpose of
the data facility is to intercept, “all forms of commu-
nication, including the complete contents of private
emails, cell phone calls, and Google searches, as well
as all sorts of personal data trails—parking receipts,
travel itineraries, bookstore purchases, and other digi-
tal “pocket litter.”
By creating a gigantic database of every communi-
cation imaginable, the NSA hopes to monitor and pre-
empt the spread of mass civil unrest in America.
Preparing Drones for
Domestic Oppression
Last week, the Justice Department re-affirmed its po-
sition that the Obama administration can use armed
drones to assassinate Americans. Under the NDAA, the
whole of the United States has been declared a “battle-
field,” meaning that drones may soon be used to exe-
cute American citizens on U.S. soil.
A government that resorts to killing its own citizens
without any legal process whatsoever is clearly a dic-
tatorship engaged in domestic oppression. The only
imaginable scenario under which this program would
be justifiable was if the U.S. was under a state of martial
law and the government was on the verge of collapse.
Preparing for Martial Law
Preparation for martial law can be seen in numerous
different guises, but perhaps the most chilling is a na-
tionwide FEMA program which is training pastors and
other religious representatives to become secret police
enforcers who teach their congregations to “obey the
government” in preparation for the implementation of
martial law, property and firearm seizures, mass vacci-
nation programs and forced relocation.
Characterizing the American
People as the New Target
of the War on Terror
The U.S. Army’s Operating Concept 2016-2028 dic-
tates that the military’s “full spectrum operations” will
include “operations within American borders.” Scenar-
ios where Americans form into militia groups and be-
come “insurrectionists” as a result of an economic col-
lapse and have to be eliminated by the U.S. Army have
already been mapped out by military planners.
A leaked U.S. Army manual also reveals plans for the
military to carry out “Civil Disturbance Operations”
during which troops will be used domestically to quell
riots, confiscate firearms and even kill Americans on
U.S. soil during mass civil unrest.
The Department of Homeland Security’s ‘See Some-
thing, Say Something’ program habitually portrays
middle class Americans as terrorists. In addition, nu-
merous DHS-funded reports have characterized “lib-
erty lovers” and other constitutionalists as domestic
terrorists.
Every indication presents us with the inescapable re-
ality that the US government is preparing for mass civil
unrest at some point over the next five to ten years.
When we look at the recent history of nations that have
suffered financial collapse, domestic disorder is clearly
a key component of a deliberate agenda on behalf of the
banking elite to undermine and loot economies – con-
fiscating national sovereignty in the process.
On the next page, we’ll explore why the elite, al-
though keen on provoking mass social unrest and even
civil war, are destined to lose the battle.
TE WANT RIOTS IN AMERICA
The Department of Homeland Security has purchased over 1.6
billion rounds of ammunition in the last 10 months alone. At
the height of combat operations in Iraq, the U.S. Army only used
5.5 million bullets a month. Why has the DHS stockpiled enough
bullets for a 30-year war if it is not preparing for some form of
domestic disorder?
writtenby AlexJones

14 www.infowars.com
D
espite the fact that the banking
elite wants to generate riots
and stir social disorder in order
to collapse the U.S. economy so
they can buy up real assets on
the cheap, if such chaos was to
spill over into a full blown civil
war, the consequences for the
technocrats would be disastrous.
In part one we explored why the elite routinely
generate civil unrest in countries as a tactic of
driving down confidence, scaring away investors
and setting themselves up as the saviors in or-
der to loot what’s left of the economy for next to
nothing.
We also documented how authorities in Amer-
ica are clearly in a preparatory phase for mass
civil unrest to break out within the next 5 to 10
years.
However, basic figures, along with the lessons
of recent history, clearly suggest that should such
disorder spiral into a new civil war, which many
suggest is the very outcome federal agencies
are gearing up for (the DHS alone has purchased
enough bullets to wage a 30 year conflict), the
result for the elite is inevitable failure.
It is imperative to stress that ordinary Ameri-
cans do not want a civil war. This is not some-
thing we or anyone we associate with is actively
calling to initiate. This is simply a warning to the
power structure that their policies are setting the
stage for this very outcome – and it’s not going to
end well for them.
Al Sharpton recently suggested that Americans
should accept government regulation of the Sec-
ond Amendment because the primary reason the
founders put the right to bear arms in the con-
stitution – to defend against government tyran-
ny – is no longer applicable. Sharpton brazenly
implied that the government would just be able
to drone strike all Americans who resisted being
disarmed.
“First of all, if the government were to come
to disarm you, you would not be able to use an
automatic weapon to defend yourself. Let’s be se-
rious. We’re in a world of drones now so the Sec-
ond Amendment would not help you in that area.
It is absurd to try to cite that,” said Sharpton.
In reality, even if a tiny minority of armed
Americans chose to resist government oppres-
sion – the odds would be stacked hugely in their
favor.
Consider the recent story about the manhunt
for former LAPD officer Christopher Dorner.
It took the vast resources and manpower of the
Los Angeles Police Department and numerous
other law enforcement bodies and federal agen-
cies over a week to track down one guy - one guy!
As part of that manhunt, LAPD officers showed
themselves to be bumbling incompetents – en-
gaging in frenzied shootings of innocent peo-
ple who looked nothing like Dorner and eventu-
ally having to burn Dorner alive inside a cabin in
order to apprehend him.
If it takes the LAPD over a week to find and
kill one guy, how much effort do you think would
be required to disarm or kill 100 million Ameri-
can gun owners without meaningful resistance?
Consider the US occupation of Afghanistan
that has now entered its 12th year.
A total of almost 500,000 coalition forces and
Afghan National Security Forces have failed to
defeat Taliban insurgents numbering just 25,000
– a ratio of 20 to 1 – in over 12 years of combat
operations.
If the finest of the US military and their al-
lies cannot defeat 25,000 ragtag insurgents in 12
years, how on earth are 100 million Americans
going to be subdued?
Consider the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
17,000 troops working on the grounds of
the Baghdad Airport couldn’t even secure the
road leading to the airport months after the in-
vasion.
If 17,000 troops can’t even control a single
road, how does the government plan to success-
Considerthefactthatthere
are almost 100 million gun
owners in the United States,
who in total own over 300
million firearms and rising.
There are only around 1.4
million active duty person-
nel in the entire U.S. military
– that includes the Army, Ma-
rine Corps, Navy, Air Force
and Coast Guard. Even if you
include national guard re-
serves, the total figure is
less than 2.3 million.
Even if just five percent
of American gun owners ac-
tively resisted in a civil war,
that would be five million
Americans – more than dou-
ble the entire U.S. military
and national guard, many of
whom are already engaged
overseas. So even if the gov-
ernment used the military to
fire upon U.S. citizens, the
troops would be easily out-
numbered.
WHY THE ELITE WOULD L

fully occupy an entire country in the event of
martial law?
When a population is under occupation and
they are being oppressed, the zeal for resistance
knows no bounds.
Victory is achieved by refusing to submit – re-
sistance is victory.
The banking elite which controls the US gov-
ernment – the same elite that has engineered ri-
ots in other countries – most recently Greece – as
part of a process of turning those nations into
empty vassals that can be easily looted for their
wealth, infrastructure and resources, must real-
ize that it cannot win a civil war in the United
States.
Such an eventuality would result in massive
bloodshed on both sides – and the elite simply
doesn’t have the numbers to claim victory.
This is a warning to the technocrats – do not
try to divide and conquer the American people,
the police, and the military. Stop characterizing
patriotic, freedom loving Americans as domestic
terrorists. Do not try to initiate a civil war that
would achieve nothing but carnage and a sus-
tained breakdown of society.
As top constitutional scholars like Dr. Edwin
Vieira and Lew Rockwell have noted, one of the
reasons why the federal government is so petri-
fied of the American people rising up to re-assert
their God-given rights in the face of an establish-
ment which is arming to the teeth against them,
is the threat posed to their illegal power monop-
oly by the prospect of secession.
Secession is not about destroying America, it
is about reinvigorating America as the found-
ers envisioned it, and in the process disengag-
ing from the very forces – the offshore banking
elite – who are themselves working feverishly to
destroy America so that they may be the first to
slice up and devour the dead carcass of a once
great nation, just as they have done to numerous
other countries over the last three decades.
LOSE A CIVIL WAR

18 www.infowars.com
C
alifornia lawmakers are proposing an
anti-Second Amendment law that will ri-
val the one recently passed in New York.
Democrats in control of the state Legisla-
ture unveiled ten proposals they boasted
will make California the most restrictive
state in the nation for possessing legally
purchased firearms.
Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, San Francis-
co Mayor Ed Lee, and police officials from around the
state rolled out the anti-Second Amendment effort on
Thursday during a news conference in Sacramento, the
state capital.
“California has always been a leader on the issue of
gun safety,” Villaraigosa said. “New York has stepped
up and stepped forward. California needs to answer
the call.”
The new law would outlaw all semiautomatic weap-
ons in the state and force gun owners to load bullets one
at a time. CBS News reports that authorities also want
to make prohibitions apply to current gun owners, thus
resulting in confiscation.
California senator Dianne Feinstein has made appar-
ent on numerous occasions the ultimate plan is to con-
fiscate all firearms. In 1995, she told CBS’ 60 Minutes
that she has worked to have “Mr. and Mrs. America”
turn in their guns to the government.
“Confiscation could be an option. Mandatory sale to
the state could be an option. Permitting could be an op-
tion — keep your gun but permit it,” New York governor
Andrew Cuomo stated prior to the passage of a histori-
cally restrictive gun law in the state.
In addition, California will impose new rules on am-
munition sales. Ammo buyers will be required to pay a
fee and undergo a background check by the state De-
partment of Justice every time bullets are sold, thus re-
cording all ammunition sales and purchaser information
with the state.
In addition to a mandatory state-wide gun registra-
tion, the law would make the sale and current posses-
sion of magazines holding more than ten bullets illegal.
So-called “bullet buttons” and certain shotguns will
also become illegal if the legislation is enacted.
Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg said he is
confident Democrats will leverage majorities in the As-
sembly and Senate and send the draconian measures to
the state’s Democratic governor, Jerry Brown.
“It strikes me as if these folks are playing some sort of
game of one-upsmanship with New York at the expense
of law-abiding citizens, and that’s just unconscionable,”
Sam Paredes, executive director of Gun Owners of Cali-
fornia, told CBS News.
Republicans stated the obvious. “The laws they are
(proposing) would have made no difference in the Con-
necticut shooting whatsoever,” Sen. Dan Logue said.
AND THEN IN
MISSOURI...
Democrats around the country are in a race to destroy
the Second Amendment and another outrage is going
down in Missouri.
Democrats, Rory Ellinger and Jill Schupp, have intro-
duced House Bill 545, a law that with the stroke of a
pen will turn thousands of law-abiding Missourians into
class C felons. It will ban the possession, sale, transfer
or manufacture of semi-automatic rifles and magazines
capable of holding more than 10 rounds.
The law is in effect de facto confiscation demanding
the “surrender” of firearms to the government.
“Any person who, prior to the effective date of this law,
SEMI-AUTO CONF
PROPOSED IN
written by KURT NIMMO

www.prisonplanet.com 19www.prisonplanet.com 19
was legally in possession of an assault weapon or large
capacity magazine shall have 90 days from such effec-
tive date to do any of the following without being sub-
ject to prosecution,” the proposed law states.” Residents
will be ordered to “remove the assault weapon or large
capacity magazine from the state of Missouri… Render
the assault weapon permanently inoperable; or… Sur-
render the assault weapon or large capacity magazine
to the appropriate law enforcement agency for destruc-
tion, subject to specific agency regulations.”
Missouri’s proposed law is strikingly similar to one
rcently enacted in New York:
“IF YOU OWN A LARGE CAPACITY
MAGAZINE GREATERTHAN 10 ROUND
CAPACITY THAT WAS A GRANDFA-
THERED MAGAZINE AS A RESULT OF
THE 1994 FEDERAL ASSAULTWEAP-
ON BAN, WITHIN A YEAR, YOU MUST
DO ONE OFTHE FOLLOWING: DISPOSE
OF ITTO ANOTHER PERSON OUTSIDE
NEWYORK STATE, SURRENDER ITTO
LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS, OR
PERMANENTLYALTER SUCHTO ONLY
ACCEPTSEVEN ROUNDS.”
Following California Senator Dianne Feinstein’s
high-profile effort to introduce legislation calling for
outlawing semi-automatic firearms and a national “gun
safety” campaign initiated by the Obama administra-
tion, Democrats around the country began calling for
government confiscation of firearms and the destruction
of the Second Amendment.
Feinstein, a long time opponent of the Second Amend-
ment, told CBS in 1995 that the ultimate plan is to have
“Mr. and Mrs. America” turn in their guns to the gov-
ernment.
In December, New York governor Andrew Cuomo be-
gan an aggressive effort to restrict firearms in the state
and confiscate the weapons of citizens who do not com-
ply with retroactive rules on so-called assault weapons.
“Confiscation could be an option. Mandatory sale to
the state could be an option. Permitting could be an op-
tion — keep your gun but permit it,” Cuomo said.
Prior to passage, Cuomo declared the Second Amend-
ment “is a scourge on society” as Democrats said the
legislation does not endanger the constitutional right to
FISCATION PLANS
CALIFORNIA...
...IS YOUR STATE NEXT?
own firearms.
On Jan. 13, 2013, H.R. 226 was introduced in the
House of Representatives by Connecticut Democrat
Rep. Rosa DeLauro. The bill will amend the 1986 IRS
code and allow a credit if taxpayers “surrender” their
guns to the government.
Cited as the “Support Assault Firearms Elimination
and Reduction for our Streets Act,” the proposed legis-
lation represents another effort to convince citizens that
they must voluntarily turn in their guns as a civic duty
and to do their part to reduce “gun violence” and pro-
tect children, as Obama said on January 16.
“The bill is yet more evidence that federal and state
governments are now pulling out all stops short of door-
to-door confiscation in their coordinated effort to dis-
arm the American people,” we reported on Infowars.
com at the time.
In February, Democrats worked feverishly on “a fac-
simile of the President’s plan, which was also the im-
petus behind the bevy of gun control bills that are now
circulating the Senate,” S.H. Blannelberry wrote.
Kurt Nimmo is the editor at Infowars.com and the au-
thor of “Another Day in the Empire: Life in Neoconser-
vative America.”

THE DEPARTMENT OF
HOMELAND SECURITY
PURCHASES 21.6 MILLION
MORE ROUNDS OF AMMUNITION
writtenby PaulJosephWatson
This adds to the 1.6 billion bullets it has already obtained over the
course of the last 10 months alone, figures which have stoked
concerns that the federal agency is preparing for civil unrest.
T
he Department of Homeland Security
is set to purchase a further 21.6 million
rounds of ammunition to add to the 1.6
billion bullets it has already obtained
over the course of the last 10 months
alone, figures which have stoked
concerns that the federal agency is
preparing for civil unrest.
A solicitation posted yesterday on the Fed Bid
website details how the bullets are required for the
DHS Federal Law Enforcement Training Center in
Artesia, New Mexico.
The solicitation asks for 10 million pistol cartridge
.40 caliber 165 grain jacketed hollow point bullets (100
packagings of 100,000 rounds) and 10 million 9mm 115
grain jacketed hollow point bullets (100 quantities of
100,000 rounds).
The document also lists a requirement for 1.6 million
pistol cartridge 9mm ball bullets (40 packagings of
40,000 rounds).
An approximation of how many rounds of ammunition
the DHS has now secured over the last 10 months stands at
around 1.625 billion. In March 2012, ATK announced that
they had agreed to provide the DHS with a maximum of
450 million bullets over four years, a story that prompted
questions about why the feds were buying ammunition in
such large quantities. In September last year, the federal
agency purchased a further 200 million bullets.
To put that in perspective, during the height of
active battle operations in Iraq, U.S. soldiers used 5.5
million rounds of ammunition a month. Extrapolating
the figures, the DHS has purchased enough bullets
over the last 10 months to wage a full scale war for
almost 30 years.
Such massive quantities of ammo purchases have
stoked fears that the agency is preparing for some kind
of domestic unrest. In 2011, Department of Homeland
Security chief Janet Napolitano directed Immigration
and Customs Enforcement to prepare for a mass influx
of immigrants into the United States, calling for the
plan to deal with the “shelter” and “processing” of large
numbers of people.
The federal agency’s primary concern is now
centered around thwarting “homegrown terrorism,” but
information produced and used by the DHS to train
its personnel routinely equates conservative political
ideology with domestic extremism.
A study funded by the Department of Homeland
Security that was leaked last year characterizes
Americans who are “suspicious of centralized federal
authority,” and “reverent of individual liberty” as
Extrapolating the figures, the
DHS has purchased enough
bullets over the last 10 months
to wage a full scale war for
almost 30 years.
“extreme right-wing” terrorists.
In August 2012, the DHS censored information relating
to the amount of bullets purchased by the federal agency
on behalf of Immigration & Customs Enforcement,
citing an “unusual and compelling urgency” to acquire
the bullets, noting that there is a shortage of bullets
which is threatening a situation that could cause
“substantial safety issues for the government” should
law enforcement officials not be adequately armed.
As we highlighted in previous issues, the DHS’ previous
ammunition solicitation was awarded to Evian Group,
an organization that was formed just five days before
the announcement of the solicitation and appeared to
be little more than a front organization since it didn’t
have a genuine physical address, a website, or even a
phone number.
While Americans are being browbeaten with rhetoric
about the necessity to give up semi-automatic firearms
in the name of preventing school shootings, the
federal government is arming itself to the teeth with
both ammunition and guns. Last September, the DHS
purchased no less than 7,000 fully automatic assault
rifles, labeling them “Personal Defense Weapons.”
20 www.infowars.com

22 www.infowars.com
he Bush regime’s response to 9/11
and the Obama regime’s validation
of this response have destroyed ac-
countable democratic government
in the United States. So much unac-
countable power has been concen-
trated in the executive branch that
the U.S. Constitution is no longer an
operable document.
Whether a person believes the official story of 9/11
which rests on unproven government assertions or be-
lieves the documented evidence provided by a large
number of scientists, first responders, and structural
engineers and architects, the result is the same. 9/11
was used to create an open-ended “war on terror” and a
police state. It is extraordinary that so many Americans
believe that “it can’t happen here” when it already has.
We have had a decade of highly visible evidence of the
construction of a police state: the PATRIOT Act, illegal
spying on Americans in violation of the Foreign Intelli-
gence Surveillance Act, the initiation of wars of aggres-
sion–war crimes under the Nuremberg Standard–based
on intentional lies, the Justice Department’s concocted
legal memos justifying the executive branch’s violation
of domestic and international laws against torture, the
indefinite detention of U.S. citizens in violation of the
constitutionally protected rights of habeas corpus and
due process, the use of secret evidence and secret “ex-
pert witnesses” who cannot be cross-examined against
defendants in trials, the creation of military tribunals
in order to evade federal courts, secret legal memos
giving the president authority to launch preemptive cy-
ber attacks on any country without providing evidence
that the country constitutes a threat, and the Obama
regime’s murder of U.S. citizens without evidence or
due process.
As if this were not enough, the Obama regime
now creates new presidential powers by crafting se-
cret laws, refusing to disclose the legal reasoning on
which the asserted power rests. In other words, laws
now originate in secret executive branch memos and
not in acts of Congress. Congress? We don’t need no
stinking Congress.
Despite laws protecting whistleblowers and the me-
dia and the U.S. Military Code which requires soldiers
to report war crimes, whistleblowers such as CIA agent
John Kiriakou, media such as Julian Assange, and soldiers
such as Bradley Manning are persecuted and prosecuted
for revealing U.S. government crimes. http://www.infor-
mationclearinghouse.info/article33804.html The crimi-
nals go free, and those who report the crimes are punished.
The justification for the American police state is the
“war on terror,” a hoax kept alive by the FBI’s “sting
operations.” Normally speaking, a sting operation is
when a policewoman poses as a prostitute in order to
ensnare a “John,” or a police officer poses as a drug
dealer or user in order to ensnare drug users or deal-
ers. The FBI’s “sting operation” goes beyond these vic-
timless crimes that fill up U.S. prisons.
The FBI’s sting operations are different. They are
just as victimless as no plot ever happens, but the FBI
doesn’t pose as bomb makers for terrorists who have a
plot but lack the weapon. Instead, the FBI has the plot
and looks for a hapless or demented person or group,
or for a Muslim enraged over the latest Washington
insult to him and/or his religion. When the FBI locates
its victim, its agents approach the selected perpetrator
pretending to be Al-Qaeda or some such and ply the
selected perpetrator with money, the promise of fame,
or threats until the victim signs on to the FBI’s plot and
is arrested.
Trevor Aaronson in his book, The Terror Factory: In-
side the FBI’s War on Terrorism, documents that the
FBI has so far concocted 150 “terrorist plots” and that
almost all of the other “terrorist cases” are cases unre-
lated to terrorism, such as immigration, with a terror
charge tacked on. http://www.youtube.com/watch?-
feature=player_embedded&v=LpTOrNQ3G9Q#!
The presstitute American media doesn’t ask why, if
there is so much real terrorism requiring an Ameri-
can war against it, the FBI has to invent and solicit
terrorist plots.
Neither does the media inquire how the Taliban,
which resists the U.S. invasion and attempted occu-
pation of Afghanistan, fighting the U.S. superpower
to a standstill after 11 years, came to be designated
as terrorists. Nor does the U.S. presstitute media want
to know how tribesmen in remote regions of Pakistan
came to be designated as “terrorists” deserving of U.S.
drone attacks on the citizens, schools and medical clin-
ics of a country with which the U.S. is not at war.
Instead the media protects and perpetrates the hoax
that has given America the police state. The Ameri-
can media has become Leni Riefenstahl, as has Hol-
lywood with the anti-Muslim propaganda film, “Zero
Dark Thirty.” This propaganda film is a hate crime that
spreads Islamophobia. Nevertheless, the film is likely
to win awards and to sink Americans into both tyranny
and a hundred-year war in the name of fighting the
Muslim threat.
What I learned many years ago as a professor is that
movies are important molders of Americans‘ attitudes.
Once, after giving a thorough explanation of the Rus-
sian Revolution that led to communist rule, a student
raised his hand and said: “That’s not the way it hap-
pened in the movie.”
At first I thought he was making a witty joke, but
then I realized that he thought that the truth resided
in the movie, not in the professor who was well versed
in the subject. Ever since I have been puzzled how the
US has survived for so long, considering the ignorance
of its population. Americans have lived in the power
of the U.S. economy. Now that this power is waning,
sooner or later Americans will have to come to terms
with reality.
It is a reality that will be unfamiliar to them.
Some Americans claim that we have had police states
during other wartimes and that once the war on ter-
ror is won, the police state will be dismantled. Others
claim that government will be judicious in its use of
the power and that if you are doing nothing wrong you
have nothing to fear.
These are reassurances from the deluded. The Bush/
Obama police state is far more comprehensive than
Lincoln’s, Wilson’s, or Roosevelt’s, and the war on
terror is open-ended and is already three times lon-
ger than World War II. The Police State is acquiring
“squatter’s rights.”
Moreover, the government needs the police state
writtenbyPAULCRAIGROBERTS

in order to protect itself from accountability for its
crimes, lies, and squandering of taxpayers‘ money.
New precedents for executive power have been cre-
ated in conjunction with the Federalist Society which,
independent of the war on terror, advocates the “uni-
tary executive” theory, which claims the president has
powers not subject to check by Congress and the Judi-
ciary. In other words, the president is a dictator if he
prefers to be.
The Obama regime is taking advantage of this Repub-
lican theory. The regime has used the Republican desire
for a strong executive outside the traditional checks and
balances together with the fear factor to complete the
creation of the Bush/Cheney police state.
As Lawrence M. Stratton and I documented in our
book, The Tyranny Of Good Intentions, prior to 9/11
law as a shield of the people was already losing ground
to law as a weapon in the hands of the government. If
the government wanted to get you, there were few if
any barriers to a defendant being framed and convict-
ed, least of all a brainwashed jury fearful of crime.
WE HAVE HAD A
DECADE OF HIGHLY
VISIBLE EVIDENCE OF
THE CONSTRUCTION
OF A POLICE STATE

I cannot say whether the U.S. justice system has ever
served justice better than it has served the ambition
of prosecutors. Already in the 1930s and 1940s U.S.
Supreme Court Justice George Sutherland and U.S. At-
torney General Robert Jackson were warning against
prosecutors who sacrifice “fair dealing to build up
statistics of success.” Certainly it is difficult to find in
the ranks of federal prosecutors today Jackson’s “pros-
ecutor who tempers zeal with human kindness, who
seeks truth and not victims, who serves the law and
not factional purposes, and who approaches his task
with humility.”
Just consider the wrongful conviction of Alabama’s
Democratic governor, Don Siegelman by what appar-
ently was a Karl Rove plot to rid the South of Demo-
cratic governors. The “Democratic” Obama regime has
not investigated this false prosecution or given clem-
ency to its innocent own. Remember how quickly Bush
removed the prison sentence of Cheney’s operative
who revealed the name of a CIA undercover agent?
The Democrats are a cowed and cowardly political par-
ty, fearful of justice, and as much a part of the corrupt
police state as the Republicans.
Today the purpose of a prosecution is to serve the
prosecutor’s career and that of the party that appoints
him or her. A prosecutor’s career is served by high con-
viction rates, which require plea bargains in which the
evidence against a defendant is never tested in court
or before a jury, and by high profile cases, which can
launch a prosecutor into a political career, as Rudy Gi-
uliana achieved with his frame-up of Michael Milken.
Glenn Greenwald explained how Internet freedom
advocate Aaron Swartz was driven to his death by
the ambition of two federal prosecutors, U.S. Attor-
ney Carmen Ortiz and Assistant U.S. Attorney Stephen
Heymann, who had no aversion to destroying an innocent
person with ridiculous and trumped-up charges in order to
advance their careers. http://www.guardian.co.uk/com-
mentisfree/2013/jan/16/ortiz-heymann-swartz-account-
ability-abuse
It is rare for a prosecutor to suffer any consequence
for bringing false charges, for consciously using and
even paying for false evidence, and for lying to judge
and jury. As prosecutors are rarely held accountable,
they employ illegal and unethical methods and rou-
tinely abuse their power. As judges are mainly con-
cerned with clearing their court dockets, justice is
rarely served in America, which explains why the U.S.
has not only a larger percentage of its citizens in pris-
on than any other country on earth, but also the larg-
est absolute number of prisoners. The U.S. actually
has more of its citizens in prison than “authoritarian”
China which has a population four times larger than
the U.S. The U.S., possibly the greatest human rights
abuser in history, is constantly bringing human rights
charges against China. Where are the human rights
charges against Washington?
In America the collapse of law has gone beyond cor-
rupt prosecutors and their concocted false prosecu-
tions. Unless it needs or desires a show trial, a police
state does not need prosecutors and courts. By pro-
ducing legal memos that the president can both throw
people into prison without a trial and execute them
without a trial simply by stating that some official in
the executive branch thinks the person has a possible
or potential connection to terrorism, tyranny’s friends
in the Justice (sic) Department have dispensed with
the need for courts, prosecutors and trials.The Bush/
Obama regime has made the executive branch judge,
juror, and executioner. All that is needed is an unprov-
en assertion by some executive branch official. Here

26 www.infowars.com
we have the epitome of evil.
Evidence is no longer required for the president of the
U.S. to imprison people for life or to deprive them of
their life. A secret Justice Department memo has been
leaked to NBC News that reveals the tyrannical rea-
soning that authorizes the executive branch to execute
American citizens on the basis of belief alone without
the requirement of evidence that they are terrorists
or associated with terrorists. http://openchannel.
nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/04/16843014-exclu-
sive-justice-department-memo-reveals-legal-case-for-
drone-strikes-on-americans?lite
In “freedom and democracy” America, innocent un-
til proven guilty is no longer the operative legal prin-
ciple. If the government says you are guilty, you are.
Period. No evidence required for your termination.
Even Stalin pretended to have evidence.
The United States government is working its way
step by step toward the determination that any and
every critic of the government is guilty of providing
“aid and comfort” to Washington’s “terrorist ene-
mies,” which includes the elected Hamas government
in Gaza. The only critics exempted from this rule-in-
the-making are the neoconservatives who criticize the
US government for being too slow to throttle both its
critics and “anti-semites,” such as former U.S. Presi-
dent Jimmy Carter, who criticize the Israeli govern-
ment’s illegal appropriation of Palestinian lands. Most
of Palestine has been stolen by Israel with Washing-
ton acquiesce and aid. Therefore, nothing is left for a
“two-state solution.”
There is no doubt whatsoever that the Israeli gov-
ernment’s theft of Palestine is illegal; yet, Washing-
ton, on which Israel is totally dependent, does noth-
ing about law. Law, we don’t need no stinking law.”
Washington has might. Might is right. Get used to it.
Not only for Palestinians has law ceased to exist, but
also for Americans, and for Washington’s NATO pup-
pets in the U.K. and Europe, pitiful remnants of once
great nations now complicit in Washington’s crimes
against humanity. The Open Society Justice Initia-
tive, a NGO based in New York, has issued a report
that documents that 54 governments are involved in
Washington’s rendition and torture program. Twen-
ty-five of the governments that help Washington to
kidnap, disappear, and torture people are Europe-
an. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/feb/05/
cia-rendition-report-uk-court
The opening decade of the 21st century has seen the
destruction of all the law that was devised to protect the
innocent and the vulnerable since the rise of the now de-
funct moral conscience of the West. The West’s moral con-
science never applied outside of itself. What happened to
people in Europe’s colonies and to native inhabitants of
the U.S. and Australia is a very different story.
Nevertheless, despite its lack of coverage to the
powerless, the principle of the rule of law was a
promising principle. Now America under Bush and
Obama, two peas of the same pod, has abandoned the
principle itself.
The Obama police state will be worse than the the
Bush/Cheney police state. Unlike conservatives who
in times past were suspicious of government power,
Obamabots believe that government power is a force
for good if it is in the right hands. As Obama’s sup-
porters see him as a member of an oppressed minori-
ty, they are confident that Obama will not misuse his
power. This belief is akin to the belief that, as Jews
suffered so much at the hands of Hitler, Israel would
be fair to the Palestinians.
Glenn Greenwald writes that “the most extremist
power any political leader can assert is the power
to target his own citizens for execution without any
charges or due process, far from any battlefield. The
Obama administration has not only asserted exactly
that power in theory, but has exercised it in prac-
tice.” http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/ar-
ticle33847.htm

This is the power of a dictator. That Saddam Hussein
and Muammar Gaddafi were said to have this power
was part of their demonization as “brutal dictators,” a
justification for overthrowing their governments and
murdering the dictators and their supporters.
Ironic, isn’t it, that the president of the United
States now murders his political opponents just as
Saddam Hussein murdered his. How long before crit-
ics move from the no-fly list to the extermination list?
Additional reading: The legal analysis in the URL
below written by seasoned attorneys shows that
Obama is a tyrant. The point made by the attorneys
is too clear to be debatable. http://www.american-
thinker.com/2013/02/assassin_in_chief.html
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts is the father of Reaganomics
and the former head of policy at the Department of
Treasury. He is a columnist and was previously the
editor of the Wall Street Journal. His latest book,
“How the Economy Was Lost: The War of the Worlds,”
details why America is disintegrating.
THE PRESIDENT HAS POWERS NOT
SUBJECT TO CHECK BY CONGRESS AND
THE JUDICIARY. IN OTHER WORDS,
THE PRESIDENT IS A DICTATOR IF HE
PREFERS TO BE.

ITGETSTOTHE POINT
OF RIDICULOUSNESS
WHEN SOMEONE LIKE
SYLVESTER STALLONE
BEGINSTO LECTURE
THE AMERICAN PUB-
LIC ON GUN RIGHTS.
IN HIS LASTRAMBO
MOVIE, STALLONE
SHOTTO DEATH 83
BAD GUYS, AND HIS
LATESTFILM
IS CALLED “BULLET
TOTHE HEAD”.
34 www.infowars.com
CELEBRITIES AND GUN RIGHTS
WHO MAKES MORE SENSE?

W
hen celebrities open their mouths the
world listens. This is a fact. It may be a
sad fact, but nevertheless, it is a fact. So
with two celebrities talking about gun
control in the media today, it is interest-
ing to take a peek and find out if either of
them makes any sense.
In comments to reporters, Die Hard star Bruce Willis noted that
gun control laws pose a direct threat to wider freedoms under the
bill of rights:
“I think that you can’t start to pick apart anything out of the Bill of
Rights without thinking that it’s all going to become undone,” Willis
told The Associated Press.
“If you take one out or change one law, then why wouldn’t they
take all your rights away from you?” the star added.
The 57-year-old actor also commented that in his opinion strict
gun control legislation would do little to prevent mass shootings in
the future:
“It’s a difficult thing and I really feel bad for those families,” he
said. “I’m a father and it’s just a tragedy. But I don’t know how you
legislate insanity. I don’t know what you do about it. I don’t even
know how you begin to stop that.”
Now consider an opposing opinion from comedian Chris Rock,
who today took to the podium at a press conference for the “De-
mand A Plan” movement, which is lobbying to support the Obama
administration’s proposals for strict gun control laws.
Rock said:
“I am just here to support the President of the United States. The
President is our boss, but he is also… you know, the President and
the First Lady are kinda like the Mom and the Dad of the country.
And when your Dad says something you listen, and if you don’t it can
bite you on the ass later on. So, I’m here to support the President.”
Go watch the video here, is there any part of it that should be
transcribed? http://www.infowars.com/celebrities-and-gun-rights-
who-makes-more-sense/
So, who makes most sense? Who has the most considered opinion?
Not by any coincidence, it’s the guy who isn’t jumping on any kind
of political bandwagon.
Most Hollywood celebrities love to be seen doing what they be-
lieve is right for their careers. That’s why so many of them instantly
put their faces behind the push for strict gun control in the wake of
the Sandy Hook shooting in December.
Many were rightly exposed as hypocrites, given that they routinely
star in movies and television productions in which depictions of gun
violence is commonplace.
It gets to the point of ridiculousness when someone like Sylvester
Stallone begins to lecture the American public on gun rights. In his
last Rambo movie, Stallone shot to death 83 bad guys, and his latest
film is called “Bullet To The Head”.
Steve Watson is a London-based writer and editor for Infowars.com
and PrisonPlanet.com. He has a Masters degree in international rela-
tions from the School of Politics at the University of Nottingham in
England.
written by STEVE WATSON

36 www.infowars.com
A
fter the Tribulation presents
a profoundly convincing case
that the doctrine known as the
pre-tribulation rapture is on its
face a false prophecy meant to
distract otherwise well-mean-
ing, god-fearing Christians from
noticing that many of the predic-
tions put forth by the Book of Revelations are taking
place right before our eyes.
The documentary follows Pastors Steve L. Anderson and
Roger Jimenez as they explain to various congregations
that the ideas disseminated by pre-tribulation rapture
evangelical preachers have no basis in Bible fact and are
not backed up by scripture.
The rapture, as depicted by several books and popu-
lar movies, most notably the Left Behind series, is pro-
moted as an event that could occur at any time, that
one day, without warning, people will just vanish, “rap-
tured” or summoned by God to join him in Heaven.
Pastors Anderson and Jimenez point out several pas-
sages in the Bible that actually back up their claim that
a tribulation must happen before any type of rapture
occurs, but they also explain that many of the predic-
tions prophesied in the Book of Revelations, like the
Mark of the Beast and the implementation of a cashless
society, are already taking place around us, and Chris-
tians following pre-tribulation rapture teachings
will be “completely unprepared for what
the Bible has warned us is coming.”
The film goes on to explain that Satan
was cast down from Heaven and now
lives among us here on Earth, with
the ultimate goal of ushering in a one-
world government over which one man
can reign supreme. The idea of a one-
world government is specifically allud-
ed to in Bible texts.
After the Tribulation not only discuss-
es why it’s important to call out pre-trib-
ulation rapture teachings as false, but
that until we do, countless people will
be doomed to trust and follow an an-
ti-Christ figure who will emerge and
pose as a savior for all mankind.
After the
TribulationwrittenbyADANSALAZAR

38 www.infowars.com
W
hile millions of Americans are
struggling to put a meal on the
table, let alone come up with an
extra 2-bits for a haircut, U.S.
senators and their staff mem-
bers have consistently been
racking up annual deficits of $340,000 annually to
maintain their well-groomed appearance. And who’s
picking up the tab? The American taxpayer, of course.
Since 1997, U.S. senators and their staff members
have been lining up at The Senate Hair Care barber-
shop in the basement of the Russell Office Building
where they receive $20 haircuts and various other sa-
lon services, all on the taxpayer’s dime.
The shop has consistently run annual deficits of
$340,000 or more, and in 2012 the deficit rose to ex-
ceed $400,000. All told, taxpayers have spent almost
$5.2 million paying for haircuts, shaves, hairstyles,
and haircare products so our senators and their staff
members can look their very best while they tighten
the noose on their constituents.
While it’s true that stylists for superstars and fash-
ionistas might charge hundreds of dollars for a cut-
and-style, the average American can walk into any
neighborhood barbershop or salon and get a perfectly
respectable haircut for $10 to $12. That’s 40 to 50 per-
cent less than we’re paying for our representatives to
have their hair styled.
Even at the lower price, most Americans have to
scrimp and save before they can visit a salon, while
senators merely have to put it on the taxpayers’ tab.
And at the same time they’re getting their free hair-
cuts, they’re getting ready to vote on $1.2 trillion in
across-the-board spending cuts that are aimed directly
at the poor and elderly. At least the legislators will look
great, while informing America that the elderly will
no longer be able to afford their medication because
of Medicare cuts and that students will not be able to
advance their education because of student loans cuts
and poor school systems’ federal assistance cuts.
Paul Leonard, an adjunct professor of political sci-
ence at Wright State University and former lieutenant
governor, said: “I think it is the ultimate hypocrisy for
any legislator in Congress who is arguing for cuts from
the social side of the budget to not include their own
budget. They need to lead by example and make some
serious cuts.”
The legislative-branch budget has grown 73 percent
since 2000. The 2013 appropriations request is $4.5
billion, up 4.8 percent from 2012. Included in this sum
is funding for the Senate Hair Care barbershop, con-
gressional dining rooms, gymnasiums and many other
conveniences that the average American could never
afford, yet we are footing their bill. The justification for
this expenditure operates under the theory that provid-
ing these services close at hand allows congressional
members to save time and focus on their jobs.
“It smacks of elitism,” said Mark Caleb Smith, direc-
tor of the Center for Political Studies at Cedarville Uni-
versity. “While trimming the Senate salon will do little
to balance the budget, allowing it to run such a large
deficit indicates a lack of seriousness, at best, and im-
morality at worst. It looks shocking when juxtaposed
with the financial and fiscal difficulties our nation is
now encountering.”
America, I know you were worried, but Speaker John
Boehner will still get free haircuts, stylings and warm
shaves at his convenience, so he and the rest of Con-
gress can continue in a stalemate in style.
Donna Anderson is a contributing writer for Infowars.
com, PrisonPlanet.com and Infowars Magazine. She
believes Americans need to start paying more attention
to the things that are going on around them—before
it’s too late. Read more from Donna on Infowars.com
and follow her on twitter @C2CWriter.
HOW COMB
CONGRESS
CAN CUT
THEIR HAIR TO
THE TUNE OF
5.1 MILLION
TAXPAYER-
DOLLARS
BUT CAN’T
CUT THEIR
BUDGET?writtenby DONNAANDERSON

written by STEVE WATSON
Six-Year-
Old Girl
Expelled
For Bringing
Plastic Toy
Gun to Show
and Tell
Schools all over the
country are weeding
out the terrorists
referenced in Jon Rappoport’s article on page 46
published Jan. 31, 2013 on Infowars.com
T
he deadly rise of extremism in Amer-
ica continues as yet another child has
been expelled from school for wielding
a toy gun.
WLTX news reports that six-year-
old Naomi McKinney brought a small
transparent plastic toy gun to school
for a show and tell, causing her
teachers to freak out.
The kindergartner’s father told reporters that he was
called to Alice Drive Elementary in Sumter, South Car-
olina, because his daughter “was fixing to be expelled.”
“I got in the car and rushed down there and when I got
in there the principal told me that she had a gun at school
and she pulls it out and it is a little clear plastic gun.”
Hank McKinney said.
“You have to show some kind of judgment,” the father
continued. “I know there is a lot going on with guns and
schools and that is tragic but a six year old bringing a toy
to school doesn’t know better.”
The school has expelled Naomi indefinitely, saying in a
statement that weapons or replica weapons are prohib-
ited. School officials refused to release any pictures or
details of the offending item, saying they are “part of the
child’s discipline record.”
“I’m sorry anything can be a weapon,” the father said.
“A pencil is more of a weapon than the toy gun she
brought to school.”
When the parents tried to appeal, the school sent them
a letter saying that the girl would be subject to criminal
trespassing charges if she is seen on the campus or at any
school sponsored event.
Naomi will instead be assigned a home-based instruc-
tor from the school district, according to officials.
When asked what her intentions were regarding the
dangerous weapon, the girl said “I chose to bring it to
school because I thought I could show my friends it be-
cause they might like seeing it.”
When asked to react to her expulsion, Naomi said “I felt
bad because i didn’t want to miss all my friends”. Clearly
she is very much a dangerous terror threat and has been
dealt with accordingly.
This case is far from isolated, as we have seen over
the past days and weeks, in the wake of the Sandy Hook
shooting. It is now a daily occurrence.
Yesterday we reported on the five-year-old in Massa-
chusetts who faces suspension for building a small toy
gun out of lego bricks and play-shooting his classmates.
Earlier this week, we reported on an incident that
erupted when a discussion between two children about
a toy nerf gun caused a lockdown and a massive armed
police response at two elementary schools in the Bronx.
Earlier this month, a Long Island high school was
also placed on lock down for 6 hours in response to a
student carrying a toy nerf gun.
Another incident this month saw a five-year-old girl
suspended after a three hour grilling, and described as
a “terroristic threat”, when she brought a pink bubble
gun to school.
Last week, a South Philadelphia elementary student
was searched in front of classmates and threatened
with arrest after she mistakenly brought a “paper gun”
to school.
A 6-year-old boy was suspended from his elementary
school in Maryland for making a gun gesture with his
hand and saying “pow”.
Days later another two 6-year-olds in Maryland were
suspended for pointing their fingers into gun shapes
while playing “cops and robbers” with each other.
In Oklahoma, a five-year-old boy was also recently sus-
pended for making a gun gesture with his hand.
A 13-year-old Middle School seventh grade student
in Pennsylvania was also suspended for the same
hand gesture.

40 www.infowars.com
T
he overwhelming scientific
consensus is that any amount
of radiation – no matter how
small – can cause cancer and
other serious health effects.
(Current safety standards
are based on the ridiculous
assumption that everyone ex-
posed is a healthy man in his
20s – and that radioactive par-
ticles ingested into the body
cause no more damage than
radiation hitting the outside of the body. In the real
world, however, even low doses of radiation can cause
cancer. Moreover, small particles of radiation – called
“internal emitters” – which get inside the body are
much more dangerous than general exposures to ra-
diation. See this and this. And radiation affects small
children much more than full-grown adults.)
But the Department of Energy – the agency which is
responsible for the design, testing and production of all
U.S. nuclear weapons, promotes nuclear energy as one
of its core functions, which has been covering up nu-
clear accidents for decades, and has used mutant lines
of human cells to promote voodoo, anti-scientific argu-
ments – proposes letting radiation into our silverware.
Counterpunch notes:
Even the deregulation-happy Wall St. Journal sound-
ed shocked: “The Department of Energy is proposing to
allow the sale of tons of scrap metal from government
nuclear sites — an attempt to reduce waste that critics
say could lead to radiation-tainted belt buckles, surgi-
cal implants and other consumer products.”
Having failed in the ‘80s and ‘90s to free the nucle-
ar bomb factories and national laboratories of millions
of tons of their radioactively contaminated scrapand
nickel, the DOE is trying again. Its latest proposal is
moving ahead without even an Environmental Impact
Statement. Those messy EISs involve public hearings,
so you can imagine the DOE’s reluctance to face the
public over adding yet more radiation to the doses
we’re already accumulating.
Congressman Markey writes:
A Department of Energy proposal to allow up to 14,000
metric tons of its radioactive scrap metal to be recycled
into consumer products was called into question today
by Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) due to concerns over pub-
lic health. In a letter sent to DOE head Steven Chu, Rep.
Markey expressed “grave concerns” over the potential
of these metals becoming jewelry, cutlery, or other con-
sumer products that could exceed healthy doses of ra-
diation without any knowledge by the consumer. DOE
made the proposal to rescind its earlier moratorium on
radioactive scrap metal recycling in December, 2012.
The proposal follows an incident from 2012 involving
Bed, Bath & Beyond stores in America recalling tissue
holders made in India that were contaminated with the
radio-isotope cobalt-60. Those products were shipped
to 200 stores in 20 states. In response to that incident, a
Nuclear Regulatory Commission spokesperson advised
members of the public to return the products even
though the amount of contamination was not consid-
ered to be a health risk.
This is not the first time this has happened.
As the Progressive reported in 1998, radioactive scrap
metal was ending up in everything fromsilverware to
frying pans and belt buckles:
The Department of Energy has a problem: what to
do with millions of tons of radioactive material. So the
DOE has come up with an ingenious plan to dispose of
its troublesome tons of nickel, copper, steel and alumi-
num. It wants to let scrap companies collect the metal,
try to take the radioactivity out, and sell the metal to
foundries, which would in turn sell it to manufacturers
who could use it for everyday household products: pots,
pans, forks, spoons, even your eyeglasses.
You may not know this, but the government already
permits some companies under special licenses, to
buy, reprocess and sell radioactive metal: 7,500 tons
in 1996, by one industry estimate. But the amount of
this reprocessing could increase drastically if the DOE,
the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), and the
burgeoning radioactive metal processing industry get
their way.
They are pressing for a new, lax standard that
would do away with special permits and allow com-
panies to buy and resell millions of tons of low-level
radioactive metal.
The standard the companies seek could cause near-
ly 100,000 cancer fatalities in the United States, by the
NRC’s own estimate.
(A couple of years later, Congressman Markey suc-
cessfully banned most radioactive scrap … but now
DOE is trying to bring it back.)
Radioactive scrap is a global problem. As
Bloomberg reported last year:
“The major risk we face in our industry is radiation,”
said Paul de Bruin, radiation-safety chief for Jewom-
etaal Stainless Processing, one of the world’s biggest
stainless-steel scrap yards. “You can talk about security
all you want, but I’ve found weapons-grade uranium in
scrap. Where was the security?”
More than 120 shipments of contaminated goods,
including cutlery, buckles and work tools such as
hammers and screwdrivers, were denied U.S. entry

between 2003 and 2008 after customs and the Depart-
ment of Homeland Security boosted radiation monitor-
ing at borders.
The department declined to provide updated figures or
comment on how the metal tissue boxes at Bed, Bath &
Beyond, tainted with cobalt-60 used in medical instru-
ments to diagnose and treat cancer, evaded detection.
“The general public basically isn’t aware that they’re
living in a radioactive world,” according to Ross Bart-
ley, technical director for the recycling bureau, who
said the contamination has led to lost sales. “Those tis-
sue boxes are problematic because they’re radioactive
and they had to be put in radioactive disposal.”
Abandoned medical scanners, food-processing devic-
es and mining equipment containing radioactive met-
als such as cesium-137 and cobalt-60 are picked up by
scrap collectors, sold to recyclers and melted down by
foundries, the IAEA says.
Dangerous scrap comes from derelict hospitals and
military bases, as well as defunct government agencies
that have lost tools with radioactive elements.
Chronic exposure to low doses of radiation can lead
to cataracts, cancer and birth defects, according to the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. A 2005 study of
more than 6,000 Taiwanese who lived in apartments
built with radioactive reinforcing steel from 1983 to
2005 showed a statistically significant increase in leu-
kemia and breast cancer.
India and China were the top sources of radioactive
goods shipped to the U.S. through 2008, according to
the Department of Homeland Security. Bartley, a met-
allurgist who has tracked radioactive contamination
since the early 1990s, said there’s no evidence the situ-
ation has improved.
Two years after an Indian scrap-metal worker died
from radiation exposure, the world’s second-most pop-
ulous country hasn’t installed alarms, the Ministry of
Shipping said in December.
“The same thing could easily happen again tomorrow,”
said Deepak Jain, 65, who owns the yard where the
worker died. “We have no protection. The government
promised a lot, but has delivered absolutely nothing.”
Indeed, we are being bombarded with low-level radi-
ation from all sides:
Above-ground nuclear tests created “background” lev-
els of radioactive cesium and iodine for the first time.
Countries dump everything from radiation from nu-
clear meltdowns to radioactive submarines in the ocean
and the air
In Japan, radioactive crops are being mixed into
non-irradiated foods
The U.S. apparently signed a pact with Japan agree-
ing that the U.S. will continue buying seafood from
Japan, despite that food is not being tested for radio-
active materials.
Much of our food is now intentionally irradiated
(The government has even treated some people as
guinea pigs.)
What can we do? Counterpunch notes:
You can tell the DOE to continue to keep its radioac-
tive metal out of the commercial metal supply, com-
merce, and our personal items. You can demand a full
environmental impact statement. Comment deadline is
Feb. 9, 2013. Email to: scrap_PEAcomments@hq.doe.
gov (with an underscore after “scrap_”). Snail mail to:
Jane Summerson / DOE NNSA / PO Box 5400, Bldg.
401K. AFB East / Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185

42 www.infowars.com
A
n engineer who exposed
fundamental flaws in
the TSA’s body scanners
and eventually sued the
agency, has now filed
suit against the City of
New York for proposals
to use the scanners on
the streets.
Last month, NYPD
Commissioner Ray Kelly
told CBS New York that
his department is looking to deploy Terahertz Imaging
Detection scanners on the street in the war on “illegal
guns.”
The technology measures energy radiating from
the body up to 16 feet away and can detect anything
blocking it.
Kelly noted that the scanners, currently being would
be used in “reasonably suspicious circumstances” only,
and were intended to cut down on the number of stop-
and-frisks on the street, which many consider to be a
violation of the Fourth Amendment.
The Commissioner suggested that once fully devel-
oped, the devices would be mounted in squad cars,
noting that making the technology portable was a
top priority.
Noting that the deployment of such technology onto
the streets would raise significant privacy issues, the
police Commissioner said “We have involved our attor-
neys as we go forward with this issue.”
Jonathan Corbett, an engineer and software designer,
who runs the blog TSA Out Of Our Pants, announced
this week that he has filed suit against New York City
for “its testing and planned (or current?) deployment
of terahertz imaging devices to be used on the general
public from NYPD vans.”
Describing the devices as a “virtual stop-and-frisk,”
Corbett notes that his civil complaint, comes attached
with a motion for a preliminary injunction that would
“prohibit use of the device on random people on their
way to school, work, the theater, or the bar.”
“It is unfortunate that it seems that government at all
levels is always in need of a fresh reminder that the cit-
izens for whom it exists demand privacy, and that each
technological advance is not a new tool to violate our
privacy. However, as often as proves to be necessary,
we will give them that reminder.” Corbett writes.
Corbett became the first person to sue the TSA relat-
ing to it’s body scanners after the federal agency de-
ployed them as a primary screening method in 2010.
A video Corbett produced showing him walking
through a scanner with a concealed metal object went
viral on the internet last year. The TSA failed to even
address the fact that Corbett had proven the body scan-
ners could be easily defeated, and then it threatened
journalists not to cover the story.
Corbett’s case was provided increased gravitas when
a recent Homeland Security report noted that feder-
al investigators have “identified vulnerabilities in the
screening process” involving the scanners.
Members of Congress then invited him to present his
findings in a hearing last May.
However, in October, the Supreme Court refused to
reopen Corbett’s case against the TSA, after The 11th
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a previous dis-
missal by federal courts in Florida.
Health risksIt is important to note that the scanners currently be-
ing developed for use in New York are not the same as
the TSA’s backscatter scanners, which emit radiation,
and have been cited as potential health threats.
However, it has been noted that the proposed technol-
ogy in these street scanners would subject citizens to an-
other documented health risk – the destruction of DNA.
Studies reveal that THz waves “unzip double-strand-
ed DNA, creating bubbles in the double strand that
could significantly interfere with processes such as
gene expression and DNA replication,” according to
MIT’s Technology Review.
The scanners, which are much like the TSA’s airport
‘millimeter wave’ scanners, can create “bubbles in the
double strand that could significantly interfere with
processes such as gene expression and DNA replica-
tion,” according to the Center for Nonlinear Studies at
Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico.
For more information, also see this paper posted at
the Cornell University Library.
The NYPD argues that the technology will only be
used in exceptional circumstances, however, it is being
fine-tuned with the help of the Department of Defense
counter-terrorism unit, indicating that the intention is
to scan people at rail stations or heavily populated plac-
es such as sporting events.
Indeed, multiple sets of documents released under
the Freedom Of Information Act have proven that the
Department of Homeland Security has been planning
for some time to use body scanners beyond airports.
The most recent, obtained by Jon Corbett, re-
vealed that in the year prior to rolling out body
scanners in airports, the TSA was drawing up long
term plans to deploy the machines at “ferry termi-
nals, railway, and mass transit stations” as well as
unspecified “other locations”.
The DHS has claimed that it dropped plans for mobile
body scanners a long time ago. However, a separate
set of documents recently obtained by The Electronic
Privacy Information Center revealed that the DHS con-
tinued to pursue the plans.
The DHS was still operating the program in
March 2011, just two days prior to claiming it had
“dropped the projects in a very early phase after
testing showed flaws”.
Previous EPIC FOIA work also produced records
showing that the DHS is actively moving to install
scanners in all manner of public places,
The technologies include “intelligent video,” back-
scatter x-ray, Millimeter Wave Radar, and Terahertz
Wave, and could be deployed at subway platforms,
sidewalks, sports arenas, and shopping malls.
EPIC filed a specific lawsuit against the DHS for at-
tempting to keep the program secret.
In February 2011, EPIC discovered that the DHS had
paid contractors “millions of dollars on mobile body
scanner technology that could be used at railways, sta-
diums, and elsewhere” on crowds of moving people.
According to the documents, the TSA plans to expand
the use of these systems to peer under clothes and in-
side bags away from airports.
The documents included a “Surface Transportation
Security Priority Assessment” [PDF] which revealed
details of conducting risk assessments and possible
implementation of body scanners in “Mass transit,
commuter and long-distance passenger rail, freight
rail, commercial vehicles (including intercity buses),
and pipelines, and related infrastructure (including
roads and highways), that are within the territory of
the United States.”
The DHS maintained that it had discontinued the pro-
gram, but refused to provide the proof, invoking sev-
eral FOIA exemption clauses, ironically including one
that cited “invasion of personal privacy”.
EPIC also noted that the DHS has actively deployed
“mobile body scanner technology in vans that are able to
scan other vehicles while driving down public roadways.”
“These vans, known as ‘Z Backscatter Vans,’ are
capable of seeing through vehicles and clothing and
routinely store the images that they generate.” EPIC’s
lawsuit notes.
As we previously reported, while the focus remained
on the TSA’s use of naked body scanners at airports, the
feds had already purchased hundreds of x-ray scanners
mounted in vans that were being used to randomly scan
vehicles, passengers and homes in complete violation of
the Fourth amendment and with wanton disregard for
any health consequences.
WSBTV reported on once instance of the mobile scan-
ners being used to check trucks for explosive devices at
an internal checkpoint set up by Homeland Security,
the Department of Transportation, and the TSA. Offi-
cials admitted there was no specific threat that justified
the checkpoint, and although it was labeled a “count-
er-terror operation,” the scans were also being conduct-
ed in the name of “safety”.
The TSA has wholly failed to inform the American
people before rolling out such technology. Indeed, EPIC
continues to fight another ongoing lawsuit against the
agency, which has already found that the TSA was
in violation of federal law when it deployed scanners
to airports in 2009 without holding public notifiction
hearings. Since that time the TSA has completely ig-
nored a court order to set the public comment process
into motion.
EngineerFilesLawSuit
AgainstN.Y.StreetBody
ScannerMachinesviolate Fourth Amendment, and can “unzip” DNA according to studies
written by Steve Watson

44 www.infowars.com44 www.infowars.com

www.prisonplanet.com 45www.prisonplanet.com 45www.prisonplanet.com 45
S
ixth graders are being asked to design new flags for com-
munist countries in school districts across Texas as part of
a curriculum critics have decried as “mind control” intend-
ed to make children sympathize with socialist ideals.
Creators of CSCOPE, an electronic curriculum manage-
ment system used in over 70 per cent of school districts in
Texas, were confronted by witnesses and members of the
Senate Education Committee during a hearing last week in
Austin, who complained that the material included in the
program was “anti-Christian at best and openly socialist at worst.”
One lesson plan involved students being set the task of designing symbols
for communist flags. The plan, “showed different countries’ flags and in-
structed students to “notice that socialist and communist countries use sym-
bolism on their flags.” It went on to ask students what symbols they would
use if they were to create a flag for a new socialist country.”
Senator Larry Taylor questioned whether the lesson was intended to influ-
ence children into, “sympathizing with those types of countries.”
Other lesson plans, which are included to ensure teachers, “adhere to com-
plicated state curriculum requirements,” portrayed participants in the Boston
Tea Party as terrorists while promoting pro-Islamic ideals.
“Committee Chairman Dan Patrick, R-Houston, called it “a mess.” One wit-
ness compared the system to “mind control,” and an algebra teacher wept as
he described quitting because he felt he was “aiding and abetting a crime” by
using CSCOPE in his classroom,” reports the Associated Press.
While children are being encouraged to explore socialist ideals, they are be-
ing punished for activities as American as mom and apple pie - such as an in-
cident in Maryland where two 6-year-olds were suspended for pointing their
fingers into gun shapes while playing “cops and robbers” with each other.
Innumerable other similar inc dents over the last two months where chil-
dren have been targeted for playing with toy guns, or even imaginary weap-
ons, have begun to characterize American schools as breeding grounds for
hysteria, where basic constitutional ideas like the second amendment are
treated with absolute disdain.
Over the years, there have also been several incidents of children being sus-
pended for “patriotic” drawings, such as pictures of a US Marine firing a
weapon.
A 7-year-old boy attending a Madison City School was suspended in De-
cember for drawing images of guns and having an “extensive knowledge of
firearms.” The boy’s father is a firearms instructor.
A student in Florence, Arizona was also suspended recently for having a
picture of a gun as his desktop screensaver.
As Mac Slavo points out, “Fundamental bedrock American principles pro-
tected under the US Constitution, such as the right to bear arms, are vilified
by our government sponsored education system. Yet, promoting Communism,
a system responsible for the democide of hundreds of millions of people over
the last century (ironically, by way of the gun) is perfectly acceptable.”
6th
Graders
Asked to
Design
“Com-
munist”
FlagCurriculum used in 70% of
schools districts inTexas la-
beled “mind control”
written by PAUL JOSEPH WATSON

46 www.infowars.com
What’s Behind the Punishment
for Fake Guns in Schools?
T
he Obama administration’s Department of
Agriculture has released nutrition standards
for “competitive” foods and has outlawed
snacks considered unhealthy by the nanny
state federal government.
“Regular soda is out, though high-school-
ers may have access to diet versions,” The Hill reports.
That’s right – the government is recommending our
kids drink soda laden with the deadly neurotoxin as-
partame.
As usual, the right hand of government has no idea
what the left hand is doing… or maybe it does.
Aspartame is so dangerous and detrimental to
health, even the FDA has failed to approve it – for two
decades running.
Despite this, more than 6,000 products, consumed
by over 100 million people worldwide, contain aspar-
tame, including: soft drinks, chewable vitamins, sug-
I
n the latest episode of Ban Fake Guns, we
have a boy suspended from school in Flor-
ence, Arizona, for carrying, yes, a picture of
a gun on his computer. Screen saver. This is
surely a sign of complete mental breakdown
by school officials. And yet one more reason
to home school.
Steve Watson’s article titled “Six-Year-Old
Girl Expelled for Bringing Plastic Toy Gun to
Show and Tell” runs down the recent litany
of fake gun crimes at schools across America, resulting
in student suspensions, suspension hearings and actual
school lockdowns:
Transparent toy gun. South Carolina.
Gun built from lego bricks. Massachusetts.
Two kids talking about a nerf gun. New York.
An actual nerf gun. New York.
A pink bubble gun. Pennsylvania.
A paper gun. Pennsylvania.
Pointing a finger and saying “pow.” Maryland.
Playing cops and robbers with fingers. Maryland.
Making a gun “hand gesture.” Oklahoma.
Should we assume that because cops and school offi-
cials can’t stop real crimes, they’re settling for stopping
fake crimes?
Can you hear the typical response to these school
suspensions and lockdowns? “Well, everybody in the
community is on edge these days, after Sandy Hook.”
That remark garners a “Mmm, well, sure.”
Then, the follow-up: “It’s unfortunate that school of-
ficials and police MAY HAVE overreacted. Suspension
from school is PROBABLY too much. These kids need
some form of LESSER DISCIPLINE, and, of course, ED-
UCATION about the dangers of guns.”
And there you have it. It’s a sleight-of-hand trick. Go
completely overboard with an officially certified insane
action (suspension, lockdown), and people will ask for
something slightly less insane instead.
“Well, shooting old Bob in the leg and blowing up his
car because he was sitting on his back porch cleaning
his rifle was probably a bit much. A few days in jail
would have taught him the right lesson.”
In schools, the slightly less insane (but still quite in-
sane) solution to fake guns might go something like this:
“Today, class, we’re going to learn about how danger-
ous it is to have a picture of a gun.”
“You see, Jimmy, when you build a gun out of lego,
you think it’s all right because you don’t know any bet-
ter. But some other child might be terrified when she
sees the gun. And that’s why we’re here. To protect ev-
erybody from bad feelings.”
Jimmy scratches his 5-year-old head and wonders
what world he was born into. He’s just been introduced
to “greatest good for the greatest number,” “you have
no freedom,” and “least bad for the lowest number,” all
in five seconds.
What we’re seeing here is a mandate to change the
culture. Teach these kids that any reference to, symbol
of, or thought about guns is wrong.
Welcome to operant conditioning.
These fake-gun busts are really about thought crimes.
We recently saw that with the passage of a New York
State gun law. It requires psychiatrists to signal the po-
lice when they have a patient who may be “a danger
to himself or others.” The patient is thereafter banned
from owning a gun.
Any patient, any person has had thoughts of violence.
Any psychiatrist can tease such thoughts out of a pa-
tient. And that can be sufficient to make a report to
the police.
Eventually, the population can be directed to believe
that “a bad thought” is a definite and inevitable pre-
cursor to a real crime. Therefore, nip things in the
bud. Label thoughts themselves as crimes and the
thinkers criminals.
“Well, Charlie has been having some very strange
thoughts. Did you know that? I mean, he’s not the per-
son we assumed he was.”
“Strange thoughts? You mean at the party last week?
He was just kidding around.”
“Don’t be an idiot. Thoughts like that lead to serious
crimes. Have you been living in a cave?”
And that’s what it feels like. You were living in a cave.
When you came out, you discovered the public mindset
had changed. All of a sudden, people were believing
something new. In this case, they’re believing that “bad
thoughts” always led to bad actions.
For example, remember crimes before there were
hate crimes? Somebody killed somebody else and he
went on trial for murder. Then the “hate conditions”
were added, to increase the penalties. At that point, the
court system was given the task of reading the crimi-
nal’s mind and deciding why he really did what he did.
If he had the wrong thought before committing mur-
der, he was a murderer-plus.
Soon, you’ll be hearing this: “Little Bobby brought
that nerf gun to school. Twice! It’s incredible! So the
school officials have referred him to a psychiatrist. And
his parents are making a stink about it! Can you believe
that? Obviously, the boy needs treatment. You know
what? The parents do, too.”
Here’s what you won’t hear. Over the course of the
next year, little Bobby is dosed with Ritalin, Zoloft, and
Valproate. Driven into a psychotic state by the drugs, he
stabs anther child at school.
Then people will say, “Everybody knew this would
happen. That nerf gun was the sign. The boy was hav-
ing bad thoughts.”
Every special group in America with a social agen-
da is now committed to operant conditioning of the
young. This means repetitive indoctrination in school
and intense peer pressure. These groups aren’t messing
around. They aren’t interested in rational dialogue be-
tween consenting adults. They’re going for the throat:
written by Jon Rappoport
Obama pushes aspartame on grade
schoolers, took away beverage choice

ar-free cough drops, sweeteners, yogurt and a lot of other food products.
Aspartame is responsible for migraine headaches, changes in vision, nausea
and vomiting, abdominal and joint pains, change in heart, depression, memo-
ry loss, seizure and even brain cancer.
“More than these complaints to the FDA, there are also around 10,000 doc-
umented reports of aspartame side effects and over 900 published studies on
the health hazards,” notes Dr. Joseph Mercola.
So now the USDA is pulling traditional potato chips and candy out of schools
and allowing them to be replaced with aspartame products that have a long
history of causing all kinds of health problems and even death.
joint pains, change in heart, depression, memory loss, seizure and even brain
cancer.
“More than these complaints to the FDA, there are also around 10,000 doc-
umented reports of aspartame side effects and over 900 published studies on
the health hazards,” notes Dr. Joseph Mercola.
So now the USDA is pulling traditional potato chips and candy out of schools
and allowing them to be replaced with aspartame products that have a long
history of causing all kinds of health problems and even death.
brain-bend the young early and often.
So in schools, we have the dissemination of the green
agenda, the bullying agenda, the hate-crime agenda,
the gay and lesbian agenda, the sex-education agen-
da, the vaccination agenda, the psychiatric-treatment
agenda, the share-and-care it’s-all-for-the-group agen-
da, the “living-Constitution” agenda.
I don’t care where you stand on any of these issues.
That’s not the point. The point is, the presence of these
agendas in schools reveals that those who control the
public education system in this country, and those
groups who can wheedle their way in, are truly hei-
nous people who fervently believe children are blank
slates, little machines waiting to be programmed, and
nothing more.
We are talking about a most profound cynicism con-
cerning human beings and what they are made of.
We are talking about the view that humans are abso-
lutely and only mind-controlled devices that require
the proper software and the Go signal to live their
lives and think their thoughts under the supervision
of lines of code.
Get this straight. It doesn’t matter what software
codes you might prefer. What matters is that children
are being put at auction to the highest and most per-
sistent bidder.
If you can’t grasp this big picture, I suggest you look
and see what software is operating you.
References to guns, representations of guns, and
thoughts about guns are now targets for a big-time pu-
rification/eradication campaign in schools. It’s an inno-
vation in the mass hypnosis operation. It’s happening
in schools because that’s where the children are. That’s
where they can be corralled and controlled. That’s
where the federal money keeps the lights on and the
toilets flushing and the checks coming. It’s called lever-
age. Behind their big bucks, the feds play a tune, and
the teachers repeat it, over and over and over.
The author of an explosive collection, THE MATRIX
REVEALED, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressio-
nal seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated
for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative
reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medi-
cine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin
Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines
in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and
seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative
power to audiences around the world. You can sign up
for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com.

U.S. GOV’T GOLD AT-COSTTODAY - U.S. Money Reserve has scheduled what could be the final release of U.S. Gov’t-Issued $5 Gold
Coins previously held at the U.S. Mint at West Point. These Gov’t-Issued Gold Coins are being released on a
first-come, first-served basis for the incredible markup-free price of only $178.00 per coin. Please be advised:
Our at-cost U.S. Gov’t Gold inventory will be available at this special price while supplies last or for up to 30
days. Do not delay. Call a Sr. Gold Specialist today.
DUE TO STRICT LIMITED AVAILABILITY, TELEPHONE ORDERS
WILL BE ACCEPTED ON A FIRST-COME, FIRST-SERVED BASIS
ACCORDING TO THE TIME AND DATE OF THE ORDER.
Own Gov’t-Issued Gold Coins
Vault No. IW1-178
Coins enlarged
to show detail.
© 2013 U.S. Money Reserve
If you’ve been waiting to move your
hard-earned money into precious
metals, the time is now to consider
transferring your U.S. dollars into
United States Government Gold.
The Gold market is on the move,
and has been up as much as 450% over the past
10 years - outpacing the DOW, NASDAQ and S&P
500. Call immediately to order your United States
Gold Coins direct from our Main Vault Facility,
at-cost for the amazing price of only $178.00 per
coin. Special arrangements can be made for gold
purchases over $50,000. Order your gold today!
•UN
ITED STAT
ES•
C
O
INS
LOG
GO
T
V
’
D
CALL TOLL-FREE (7 Days A Week)
1-855-879-8020
MASTERCARD • VISA • AMEX • DISCOVER
CHECK • BANK WIRE
1 – Gov’t-Issued Gold Coin $ 178.00
5 – Gov’t-Issued Gold Coins $ 890.00
10 – Gov’t-Issued Gold Coins $ 1,780.00
THE MARKETS FOR COINS ARE UNREGULATED. PRICES CAN RISE OR FALL AND CARRY SOME RISKS. THE
COMPANY IS NOT AFFILIATED WITH THE U.S. GOVERNMENT AND THE U.S. MINT. PAST PERFORMANCE
OF THE COIN OR THE MARKET CANNOT PREDICT FUTURE PERFORMANCE. SPECIAL AT-COST OFFER IS
STRICTLY LIMITED TO ONLY ONE LIFETIME PURCHASE OF 10 AT-COST COINS (REGARDLESS OF PRICE PAID)
PER HOUSEHOLD, PLUS SHIPPING AND INSURANCE. PRICE NOT VALID FOR PRECIOUS METALS DEALERS.
( PLUS INSURANCE, SHIPPING & HANDLING $8.00)
$
17800EACH
PRICES MAY BE MORE OR LESS BASED ON
CURRENT MARKET CONDITIONS. CALL NOW.
PURE COST - NO DEALER MARKUP!

Civil War 2 7th Issue Infowars Magazine

Civil War 2 7th Issue Infowars Magazine

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

What's hot

What's hot (19)

Similar to Civil War 2 7th Issue Infowars Magazine

Similar to Civil War 2 7th Issue Infowars Magazine (6)

More from infowarrior78

More from infowarrior78 (8)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (15)

Civil War 2 7th Issue Infowars Magazine