nfpSynergy's Driver of Ideas Joe Saxton looks first at how charity lotteries could raise even more for good causes and how deregulation could help this. He then looks at executive pay; what do people think charity chief executives are paid, what should they be paid and how does this compare to other jobs, from bankers to bus drivers?
Card fraud is a major issue in the UK with this report showing that one in four adults has been a victim at some point in the past. Find out which cities are card fraud hotspots in our Regional Card Fraud report.
The document provides an overview of the 2010 financial results of an unnamed bank. Key highlights include:
- Net income for 2010 came in above plan at RUB 581 million. Assets grew 14.1% to RUB 166.2 billion while loans increased 22.1% to RUB 104 billion.
- The bank improved its loan to deposit ratio to 88.4% from 84% in 2009 by growing retail deposits 26% to RUB 68.7 billion.
- Non-performing loans declined to 10.48% of total loans from 11.06% in 2009. Cost of risk also declined significantly to 1.8% from 4.9% in 2009.
-
How Banks will Generate Revenue on Payments and Checking in the New EraDavid Kerstein
Presentation at the BAI Payments Connect Conference, March, 2010. Survey of bankers to understand implications of new changes in Reg E, impact on earnings, and future changes in Checking Account revenue.
Gen Y consumers are most likely to see value in mobile wallets, with 39% of Gen Y respondents citing mobile wallets as extremely or very valuable compared to 21% of Gen X, 18% of baby boomers, 14% of traditionalists, and 3% of the total population. Potential for remote deposit capture resides most with Gen Y consumers, with 31% of Gen Y respondents indicating they are extremely or very likely to use remote deposit capture compared to 18% of the total population and lower percentages for other generations. The top five banks and credit unions have the highest mobile penetration rates, with over 60% of their customers having a smartphone or tablet compared to around 50% of customers of community banks and regional banks, and
Combating Payments Fraud: How Well Are You Managing Your Company's Risk?Nasreen Quibria
Payments fraud incidents are increasing in frequency and severity every day. Combined with more stringent global regulatory requirements and increasing payments volumes, corporations today are challenged with combating emerging payments fraud activities. This session will discuss fraud trends impacting businesses, best practices in mitigating risk, and the tools to have in your arsenal in fighting fraudulent payment activities.
The nfpSynergy 'Trust in Charity Report for 2017' - Trend Data and AnalysisnfpSynergy
- Trust in charities rose early in 2017 and then plateaued in the 55-60% range.
- Trust in charities rose to a high of 64% early in 2017, then dipped in the middle of the year to 55% and 57% and rose at year end to 60%
- By the end of 2017, Charities were the fifth most trusted public institution after the NHS, the Armed Forces, Police and Schools.
Two years ago, charities were in 12th place behind TV and radio stations
- Trust in the FRSB and now Fundraising Regulator has more than doubled since 2009: from 15% to 37%.
- Charity supporters' trust in charities (in November 2017) is at 70%, a lot higher than non-supporters whose trust levels are at 40%
The document summarizes research on charitable activities and Christmas advertising campaigns featuring charities in the UK. It finds that while charities are prominent during Christmas, few people can name the charities associated with well-known Christmas ads. Nearly half of respondents buy charity Christmas cards, but the best remembered charity from ads was Royal British Legion at 4%. The research also showed that companies were better remembered than the partner charities.
Card fraud is a major issue in the UK with this report showing that one in four adults has been a victim at some point in the past. Find out which cities are card fraud hotspots in our Regional Card Fraud report.
The document provides an overview of the 2010 financial results of an unnamed bank. Key highlights include:
- Net income for 2010 came in above plan at RUB 581 million. Assets grew 14.1% to RUB 166.2 billion while loans increased 22.1% to RUB 104 billion.
- The bank improved its loan to deposit ratio to 88.4% from 84% in 2009 by growing retail deposits 26% to RUB 68.7 billion.
- Non-performing loans declined to 10.48% of total loans from 11.06% in 2009. Cost of risk also declined significantly to 1.8% from 4.9% in 2009.
-
How Banks will Generate Revenue on Payments and Checking in the New EraDavid Kerstein
Presentation at the BAI Payments Connect Conference, March, 2010. Survey of bankers to understand implications of new changes in Reg E, impact on earnings, and future changes in Checking Account revenue.
Gen Y consumers are most likely to see value in mobile wallets, with 39% of Gen Y respondents citing mobile wallets as extremely or very valuable compared to 21% of Gen X, 18% of baby boomers, 14% of traditionalists, and 3% of the total population. Potential for remote deposit capture resides most with Gen Y consumers, with 31% of Gen Y respondents indicating they are extremely or very likely to use remote deposit capture compared to 18% of the total population and lower percentages for other generations. The top five banks and credit unions have the highest mobile penetration rates, with over 60% of their customers having a smartphone or tablet compared to around 50% of customers of community banks and regional banks, and
Combating Payments Fraud: How Well Are You Managing Your Company's Risk?Nasreen Quibria
Payments fraud incidents are increasing in frequency and severity every day. Combined with more stringent global regulatory requirements and increasing payments volumes, corporations today are challenged with combating emerging payments fraud activities. This session will discuss fraud trends impacting businesses, best practices in mitigating risk, and the tools to have in your arsenal in fighting fraudulent payment activities.
The nfpSynergy 'Trust in Charity Report for 2017' - Trend Data and AnalysisnfpSynergy
- Trust in charities rose early in 2017 and then plateaued in the 55-60% range.
- Trust in charities rose to a high of 64% early in 2017, then dipped in the middle of the year to 55% and 57% and rose at year end to 60%
- By the end of 2017, Charities were the fifth most trusted public institution after the NHS, the Armed Forces, Police and Schools.
Two years ago, charities were in 12th place behind TV and radio stations
- Trust in the FRSB and now Fundraising Regulator has more than doubled since 2009: from 15% to 37%.
- Charity supporters' trust in charities (in November 2017) is at 70%, a lot higher than non-supporters whose trust levels are at 40%
The document summarizes research on charitable activities and Christmas advertising campaigns featuring charities in the UK. It finds that while charities are prominent during Christmas, few people can name the charities associated with well-known Christmas ads. Nearly half of respondents buy charity Christmas cards, but the best remembered charity from ads was Royal British Legion at 4%. The research also showed that companies were better remembered than the partner charities.
The document summarizes volunteering trend data from September 2017. It finds that overall volunteering levels have remained stable, but there is more volatility in younger age groups. Volunteering among 16-34 year olds, particularly young men, peaked in recent years and is now declining. However, volunteering among 25-34 year olds is still increasing, suggesting those who volunteered younger may continue as they age. Volunteering has decreased among 45-54 and 55-64 year olds, who have fewer initiatives targeting them.
New research - what exactly are charities trusted to do?nfpSynergy
Charities are seen as accurate and unbiased sources of information, ranking second after family and friends. People who run charities are also seen as trusted sources to comment on UK policy issues. While charities are trusted to have a positive impact on society, they are less trusted to use personal data wisely. There is a preference for policy decisions to be backed by expert evidence, though ordinary people want their views considered as well. Trust in charities and experts varies between those who voted Leave or Remain in the Brexit referendum.
Trust in charities and other public institutions - May 2017nfpSynergy
- Trust in charities has risen nearly 4 percentage points since last Autumn from 60% to 64%
- Charities are now the third most trusted public institution in the UK after the NHS and Armed Forces
- Trust in the Fundraising Regulator has more than doubled since 2009 from 15% to 35%
Just my Type - an archetype analysis of charity financesnfpSynergy
We are pleased to announce the launch of a new archetype analysis of the income and expenditure types in charities. Our archetype will allow charities, donors, and others to understand what the benchmark is for each type of charity, thus ensuring that judgements are made based on norms of income and expenditure for similar charities.
At present, using 'average' figures for the whole sector is like comparing apples, oranges and bananas by reference to the 'typical' fruit. Our analysis looks at the accounts of over 2500 charities with an income of over £5 million, and suggests there are six different types of income/expenditure model or archetype.
Attitudes towards charities at ChristmasnfpSynergy
Our latest research carried out with a nationally representative sample of the public in October shows how people are more aware of charities at Christmas, but no charities are gaining awareness through advertising at Christmas. Some highlights are:
• 86% of the population don’t remember any ads in which charities featured. Almost no charity ads are remembered at Christmas, and even the best remembered ads are in low single figures.. This must be a massive opportunity for a charity to dominate the charity ad market.
• 60% of the public say they hear more about charities at Christmas, and 31% are more likely to give at Christmas.
• The most common ways of giving are through charity Christmas Cards. These tend to bought by older women (65% for women 55+ vs 48% overall) and products which contain an element of donation (40% overall).
• A minority volunteer at Xmas (18%) and a minority turn are more likely to turn to charities for help at Xmas (19%)
• For about 43% of people its harder to give simply because its Christmas, with all the other demands that brings.
nfpSynergy Trust in Charities Report December 2016nfpSynergy
Here are the slides for the latest of our research into trust in charities. This is the third wave of research this year, and for the first time we have measured trust in the Fundraising Regulator rather than the Fundraising Standards Board.
What does the model grant-maker look like?nfpSynergy
Elin Lindstrom and Cian Murphy outline our research on what charities think makes the model grant-maker and how the process can be improved for all involved.
A Myth-busting presentation on Social MedianfpSynergy
The document discusses common myths about social media use for charities. It lists nine myths, such as the ideas that social media is free, a Facebook page is a full strategy, and audiences don't use social media. Each myth is followed by the name of a charity champion that has successfully used social media to fundraise, engage communities, and achieve their goals. It provides resources for learning more about effective social media use for nonprofits.
The survey found that:
- The recession has negatively impacted charities' income, services provided, and staff numbers. Many charities have altered their structure or downsized in response.
- Respondents perceive that some government initiatives like Social Impact Bonds could have a positive impact, while cuts to funding are seen as negative.
- Ensuring a sustainable funding base and growing voluntary income were cited as the top challenges facing charities. Respondents also desired changes like reducing bureaucracy and attracting high-quality staff and trustees.
- Key attributes for charitable success include quality of work, leadership, values/vision, financial soundness, and input from beneficiaries.
The document discusses different "grades" or levels of segmentation and targeting for a charity, ranging from a simple single offer to a single audience to more complex segmentation involving tailored offers for different audience segments identified through more in-depth analysis. More advanced segmentation can help recruit new supporters and maximize existing support, but it requires developing tailored products, maintaining segmentation over time, and ensuring the database can adequately capture audience data and segments.
Passion,persistence,partnerships secrets for earning more onlinenfpSynergy
Passion, persistence, and partnerships are key to earning more online. Over the past decade, internet and broadband access has grown significantly in UK households. Mobile internet access has also increased dramatically, with nearly half of people now using their phones to access the internet. Social networking participation has also risen sharply, especially on Facebook. Charities have embraced various online tools and social media to communicate with supporters, promote campaigns, understand views, and fundraise. However, strategies and board-level approval of internet efforts varies significantly among charities. Website usage is typically tracked by metrics like page views, unique visitors, and email metrics.
Passion,Persistence,Partnerships - secrets for earning more onlinenfpSynergy
Young Enterprise London runs various educational programs in schools to teach business and life skills to students aged 4-18 through hands-on activities and simulations. They are looking for volunteers to help deliver these programs in primary and secondary schools, which involve topics like communities, cities, and nations. Volunteers should have an interest in working with youth and possibly business experience. Young Enterprise reaches over 320,000 students per year across the UK through over 5,500 participating schools.
The document discusses using brand attributes data to understand how the public perceives charities and their brands. It describes how the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) used data from the Brand Attributes Monitor to conduct an "Outside In" review of how the public views the RSPB brand. The review found that the RSPB was seen as traditional but not exciting. It also revealed low emotional engagement with the RSPB brand. This led the RSPB to make changes to become seen as more inspiring, modern, and exciting in order to increase public engagement with the organization.
The document discusses the rise in consumer choice driven by technology, regulation, competition and culture. It notes that charities need to mirror this growth in choice in how they offer branding, motivate supporters, provide products, and develop supporter-centered strategies. The document provides several examples and statistics showing the vast increase in choices now available to consumers across various products and services compared to the past. This highlights the complex environment charities now operate within and the need for them to adapt how they provide choice to supporters.
Unlocking the pot of gold in legacy givingnfpSynergy
Unlocking the pot of gold in legacy giving discusses barriers to legacy giving and how to address them. Key barriers include: family first preferences, uncertainty around personal finances and mortality, a lack of will writing, and concerns about how donations are spent. To increase legacy giving, charities need to acknowledge family, provide practical examples, target households without children, respect boundaries around finances, and address concerns about donation spending. Addressing these barriers could help unlock greater potential in legacy gifts.
The potential of mobile phones for charitiesnfpSynergy
This document discusses the potential for charities and non-profits to use mobile phones and text messaging for fundraising. It notes that mobile phone ownership in Britain is widespread, with many people using their phones daily for tasks like texting, apps, and social media. Some key points made include that charities are increasingly using mobile tools like apps and text messaging for fundraising, communication, and engagement, but barriers like concerns about costs and permission still exist. It provides tips on how charities can better leverage mobile technologies and overcome cultural barriers to text fundraising.
The document provides tips for charities to improve their relationships with the media and make their PR and media work more effective. It discusses how journalists view charities and their expectations. Successful strategies identified include understanding journalists' needs, having targeted outreach, focusing on local and personal stories with human faces, and providing additional materials to support stories. The Race for Life campaign is highlighted as an example of a highly successful media campaign.
This document discusses audience segmentation for charities in Great Britain. It presents the CAM segmentation model which divides donors into 6 main segments based on their attitudes, motivations and behaviors related to charitable giving. One of the segments is "Super Doers" who are highly engaged in volunteering, campaigning and community involvement with charities. They are distinguished by their high levels of activity across all forms of charitable engagement. Personal experience with charities is the main driver of their trust and decision to support particular causes.
The significance of brand and how to research it, drawing on the experiences of two national charities and nfpSynergy’s experience in tracking charity brands over time.
Football World Cup enthusiasts worldwide can secure their FIFA World Cup 2026 Tickets through our online platform, eticketing.co. With a user-friendly interface and exclusive deals, fans can effortlessly book FIFA World Cup Tickets for thrilling matches, all at discounted prices.
The document summarizes volunteering trend data from September 2017. It finds that overall volunteering levels have remained stable, but there is more volatility in younger age groups. Volunteering among 16-34 year olds, particularly young men, peaked in recent years and is now declining. However, volunteering among 25-34 year olds is still increasing, suggesting those who volunteered younger may continue as they age. Volunteering has decreased among 45-54 and 55-64 year olds, who have fewer initiatives targeting them.
New research - what exactly are charities trusted to do?nfpSynergy
Charities are seen as accurate and unbiased sources of information, ranking second after family and friends. People who run charities are also seen as trusted sources to comment on UK policy issues. While charities are trusted to have a positive impact on society, they are less trusted to use personal data wisely. There is a preference for policy decisions to be backed by expert evidence, though ordinary people want their views considered as well. Trust in charities and experts varies between those who voted Leave or Remain in the Brexit referendum.
Trust in charities and other public institutions - May 2017nfpSynergy
- Trust in charities has risen nearly 4 percentage points since last Autumn from 60% to 64%
- Charities are now the third most trusted public institution in the UK after the NHS and Armed Forces
- Trust in the Fundraising Regulator has more than doubled since 2009 from 15% to 35%
Just my Type - an archetype analysis of charity financesnfpSynergy
We are pleased to announce the launch of a new archetype analysis of the income and expenditure types in charities. Our archetype will allow charities, donors, and others to understand what the benchmark is for each type of charity, thus ensuring that judgements are made based on norms of income and expenditure for similar charities.
At present, using 'average' figures for the whole sector is like comparing apples, oranges and bananas by reference to the 'typical' fruit. Our analysis looks at the accounts of over 2500 charities with an income of over £5 million, and suggests there are six different types of income/expenditure model or archetype.
Attitudes towards charities at ChristmasnfpSynergy
Our latest research carried out with a nationally representative sample of the public in October shows how people are more aware of charities at Christmas, but no charities are gaining awareness through advertising at Christmas. Some highlights are:
• 86% of the population don’t remember any ads in which charities featured. Almost no charity ads are remembered at Christmas, and even the best remembered ads are in low single figures.. This must be a massive opportunity for a charity to dominate the charity ad market.
• 60% of the public say they hear more about charities at Christmas, and 31% are more likely to give at Christmas.
• The most common ways of giving are through charity Christmas Cards. These tend to bought by older women (65% for women 55+ vs 48% overall) and products which contain an element of donation (40% overall).
• A minority volunteer at Xmas (18%) and a minority turn are more likely to turn to charities for help at Xmas (19%)
• For about 43% of people its harder to give simply because its Christmas, with all the other demands that brings.
nfpSynergy Trust in Charities Report December 2016nfpSynergy
Here are the slides for the latest of our research into trust in charities. This is the third wave of research this year, and for the first time we have measured trust in the Fundraising Regulator rather than the Fundraising Standards Board.
What does the model grant-maker look like?nfpSynergy
Elin Lindstrom and Cian Murphy outline our research on what charities think makes the model grant-maker and how the process can be improved for all involved.
A Myth-busting presentation on Social MedianfpSynergy
The document discusses common myths about social media use for charities. It lists nine myths, such as the ideas that social media is free, a Facebook page is a full strategy, and audiences don't use social media. Each myth is followed by the name of a charity champion that has successfully used social media to fundraise, engage communities, and achieve their goals. It provides resources for learning more about effective social media use for nonprofits.
The survey found that:
- The recession has negatively impacted charities' income, services provided, and staff numbers. Many charities have altered their structure or downsized in response.
- Respondents perceive that some government initiatives like Social Impact Bonds could have a positive impact, while cuts to funding are seen as negative.
- Ensuring a sustainable funding base and growing voluntary income were cited as the top challenges facing charities. Respondents also desired changes like reducing bureaucracy and attracting high-quality staff and trustees.
- Key attributes for charitable success include quality of work, leadership, values/vision, financial soundness, and input from beneficiaries.
The document discusses different "grades" or levels of segmentation and targeting for a charity, ranging from a simple single offer to a single audience to more complex segmentation involving tailored offers for different audience segments identified through more in-depth analysis. More advanced segmentation can help recruit new supporters and maximize existing support, but it requires developing tailored products, maintaining segmentation over time, and ensuring the database can adequately capture audience data and segments.
Passion,persistence,partnerships secrets for earning more onlinenfpSynergy
Passion, persistence, and partnerships are key to earning more online. Over the past decade, internet and broadband access has grown significantly in UK households. Mobile internet access has also increased dramatically, with nearly half of people now using their phones to access the internet. Social networking participation has also risen sharply, especially on Facebook. Charities have embraced various online tools and social media to communicate with supporters, promote campaigns, understand views, and fundraise. However, strategies and board-level approval of internet efforts varies significantly among charities. Website usage is typically tracked by metrics like page views, unique visitors, and email metrics.
Passion,Persistence,Partnerships - secrets for earning more onlinenfpSynergy
Young Enterprise London runs various educational programs in schools to teach business and life skills to students aged 4-18 through hands-on activities and simulations. They are looking for volunteers to help deliver these programs in primary and secondary schools, which involve topics like communities, cities, and nations. Volunteers should have an interest in working with youth and possibly business experience. Young Enterprise reaches over 320,000 students per year across the UK through over 5,500 participating schools.
The document discusses using brand attributes data to understand how the public perceives charities and their brands. It describes how the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) used data from the Brand Attributes Monitor to conduct an "Outside In" review of how the public views the RSPB brand. The review found that the RSPB was seen as traditional but not exciting. It also revealed low emotional engagement with the RSPB brand. This led the RSPB to make changes to become seen as more inspiring, modern, and exciting in order to increase public engagement with the organization.
The document discusses the rise in consumer choice driven by technology, regulation, competition and culture. It notes that charities need to mirror this growth in choice in how they offer branding, motivate supporters, provide products, and develop supporter-centered strategies. The document provides several examples and statistics showing the vast increase in choices now available to consumers across various products and services compared to the past. This highlights the complex environment charities now operate within and the need for them to adapt how they provide choice to supporters.
Unlocking the pot of gold in legacy givingnfpSynergy
Unlocking the pot of gold in legacy giving discusses barriers to legacy giving and how to address them. Key barriers include: family first preferences, uncertainty around personal finances and mortality, a lack of will writing, and concerns about how donations are spent. To increase legacy giving, charities need to acknowledge family, provide practical examples, target households without children, respect boundaries around finances, and address concerns about donation spending. Addressing these barriers could help unlock greater potential in legacy gifts.
The potential of mobile phones for charitiesnfpSynergy
This document discusses the potential for charities and non-profits to use mobile phones and text messaging for fundraising. It notes that mobile phone ownership in Britain is widespread, with many people using their phones daily for tasks like texting, apps, and social media. Some key points made include that charities are increasingly using mobile tools like apps and text messaging for fundraising, communication, and engagement, but barriers like concerns about costs and permission still exist. It provides tips on how charities can better leverage mobile technologies and overcome cultural barriers to text fundraising.
The document provides tips for charities to improve their relationships with the media and make their PR and media work more effective. It discusses how journalists view charities and their expectations. Successful strategies identified include understanding journalists' needs, having targeted outreach, focusing on local and personal stories with human faces, and providing additional materials to support stories. The Race for Life campaign is highlighted as an example of a highly successful media campaign.
This document discusses audience segmentation for charities in Great Britain. It presents the CAM segmentation model which divides donors into 6 main segments based on their attitudes, motivations and behaviors related to charitable giving. One of the segments is "Super Doers" who are highly engaged in volunteering, campaigning and community involvement with charities. They are distinguished by their high levels of activity across all forms of charitable engagement. Personal experience with charities is the main driver of their trust and decision to support particular causes.
The significance of brand and how to research it, drawing on the experiences of two national charities and nfpSynergy’s experience in tracking charity brands over time.
Football World Cup enthusiasts worldwide can secure their FIFA World Cup 2026 Tickets through our online platform, eticketing.co. With a user-friendly interface and exclusive deals, fans can effortlessly book FIFA World Cup Tickets for thrilling matches, all at discounted prices.
Euro Cup Group E Preview, Team Strategies, Key Players, and Tactical Insights...Eticketing.co
We offer Euro Cup Tickets to admirers who can get Belgium vs Romania Tickets through our trusted online ticketing marketplace. Eticketing.co is the most reliable source for booking Euro Cup Final Tickets. Sign up for the latest Euro Cup Germany Ticket alert.
Olympic 2024 Key Players and Teams to Watch in Men's and Women's Football at ...Eticketing.co
Olympic 2024 fans worldwide can book Olympic Football Tickets from our online platforms e-ticketing. co. Fans can book Olympic Tickets on our website at discounted prices. Experience the thrill of the Games in Paris and support your favorites athletes as they compete for glory.
Luciano Spalletti Leads Italy's Transition at UEFA Euro 2024.docxEuro Cup 2024 Tickets
Italy are the defending European champs, but after Luciano Spalletti swapped Roberto Mancini last September, they are still taking the cautious first steps of a new era
Euro 2024 Belgium's Rebirth the New Generation Match the Golden Era.docxEticketing.co
The Golden Group is over. Can a new group step up? Two years ago, Kevin De Bruyne plunged Belgium’s Euro 2024 plans into disorder when he claimed the team was “too old” to win in an interview with The Protector. That Belgian squad had 10 players over 30 and the maximum average age of any Euro Cup 2024 team at the competition. A group-stage exit and just one goal at the World Cup put Belgium on course for a restructure.
We offer Euro Cup Tickets to admirers who can get Belgium vs Romania Tickets through our trusted online ticketing marketplace. Eticketing.co is the most reliable source for booking Euro Cup Final Tickets. Sign up for the latest Euro Cup Germany Ticket alert.
Belgium vs Romania Tickets | Euro Cup Tickets | Euro Cup Final Tickets
Coach Domenico Tedesco has managed a tactical shakeup and a regular exit for some of the oldest players. Experienced bests remain, not least the 37-year-old Jan Vertonghen in defense, the 32-year-old De Bruyne himself in midfield, and 31-year-old Romelu Lukaku up visible.
Still, younger actors like De Bruyne’s Manchester City partner Jeremy Doku bring fresh vitality to the team. Euro Cup Germany Qualifying unbeaten with just four goals allowed from eight games was a welcome sign of accomplishment back on track under Tedesco.
The only other squad in Group E besides Belgium to UEFA Euro 2024 qualify unbeaten, Romania was awestruck by winning a group that also checked Switzerland and Israel. Still, Euro 2024 will test a squad sorely lacking in top-level skill.
Euro 2024: Belgium's Transition from Golden Generation to New Hope
Tottenham guardian Vlad Dragusin is the only Euro Cup 2024 squad member singing regularly for one of Europe’s top clubs this flavor. He even played only nine Premier League games since adoption in January. Goalkeeper Horatiu Moldovan is a stoppage at Atletico Madrid.
There’s a link to the beauty days of Romanian soccer with midfielder Ianis Hagi, son of Gheorghe Hagi, who assisted the team to the rounds of the 1994 World Cup and Euro 2000.
We are only a combine of days away from the UEFA Euro 2024 curtain raiser. The 24 squads are winding up their provisions and getting ready to give it their all to life the wanted Euro Cup Final trophy on July 14. Spread across six clusters, the first hurdle in the knockout phase will be the plump of 16.
Euro fans worldwide can book Euro 2024 Tickets from our online platform, www.eticketing.co. Fans can book Euro Cup 2024 Tickets on our website at discounted prices.
Germany and Scotland will take things off before we get into overdrive in two weeks. Meanwhile, Belgium will be longing to bounce back after a horrendous 2022 FIFA World Cup movement, which ended in the group stage.
Belgium vs Romania Tickets | Euro Cup 2024 Tickets | Euro Cup Tickets | Euro Cup Final Tickets
Roberto Martinez completed the way for Domenico Tedesco, who has overseen a compact start to his tenure. The 38-year-old will be assured heading into the group stage
Here are our Euro 2024 predictions for the group stages
Will England make it through the group stages?, Will Germany use the home advantage to full effect?
Follow our progress, see how many we get right
If you want to join in let us know before the first game kick off and we can invite you to our private league
or join in with our friends at DeeperThanBlue
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/activity-7204868572995538944-qejG
https://www.selectdistinct.co.uk/2024/06/13/euro-2024-match-predictions/
#EURO2024 #Germany2024 #England #EURO2024predictions
Georgia vs Portugal Euro Cup 2024 Clash Unites a Nation Amid Turmoil.pdfEticketing.co
Euro 2024 fans worldwide can book Georgia vs Portugal Tickets from our online platform www.eticketing.co. Fans can book Euro Cup Germany Tickets on our website at discounted prices.
Belgium vs Romania Ultimate Guide to Euro Cup 2024 Tactics, Ticketing, and Qu...Eticketing.co
Euro Cup 2024 fans worldwide can book Belgium vs Romania Tickets from our online platform www.eticketing.co. Fans can book Euro Cup Germany Tickets on our website at discounted prices.
Matka BOSS Result | Satta Matka Tips | Kalyan Matka 143dpbossdpboss69
Satta BOSS Matka | DpBoss Matka | Matka BOSS Result | Satta Matka Tips | Kalyan Matka 143 · SATTA KING · ➥ SATTA MATKA TIME TEBAL · SATTA KING · ➥ Weekly ...
Poland vs Netherlands UEFA Euro 2024 Poland Battles Injuries Without Lewandow...Eticketing.co
UEFA Euro 2024 fans worldwide can book Poland vs Netherlands Tickets from our online platform www.eticketing.co. Fans can book Euro Cup Germany Tickets on our website at discounted prices.
Croatia vs Italy Modric's Last Dance Croatia's UEFA Euro 2024 Journey and Ita...Eticketing.co
UEFA Euro 2024 fans worldwide can book Croatia vs Italy Tickets from our online platform www.eticketing.co. Fans can book Euro Cup Germany Tickets on our website at discounted prices.
Turkey vs Georgia Tickets: Turkey's Provisional Squad for UEFA Euro 2024, Key...Eticketing.co
Euro Cup Germany fans worldwide can book Euro 2024 Tickets from our online platform www.eticketing.co.Fans can book Euro Cup 2024 Tickets on our website at discounted prices.
Turkey vs Georgia Tickets: Turkey's Provisional Squad for UEFA Euro 2024, Key...
Charity Lotteries and Deregulation / Public Perceptions of Executive Pay is and what it should be
1. Could lotteries raise more
money for charities and
other good causes?
Joe Saxton
July 2012
2. First: what do the people
who run lotteries think
about the current
situation?
3. Attitudes towards lotteries - part 1
Lotteries are more regulated than any other area of our fundraising -33% -5% 0% 29% 23%
The current regulations for lotteries make it more difficult to generate
-38% -2%
-10% 20% 15%
income from lotteries
The need to account for every ticket involves extra costs for us -48% -1%
-7% 20% 15%
The need to account for every ticket distributed (when sending more than
-38% -1%
-10% 23% 9%
£20 worth to cold prospects) and then returned involves extra…
We find the limit on prize money/value restrictive -53% -1%
-7% 16% 12%
The current regulations for lotteries increase our costs -51% -4%
-4% 16% 9%
Not sure/Not relevant
It is difficult to achieve the 20% minimum return to the beneficiary when
-39% -6% -14% 17% 6%
recruiting from cold prospects Disagree strongly
We find it difficult to avoid infringing the Gambling Commission/ Local Disagree
-34% -3% -19% 7% 11%
Authority regulations
Neither agree nor disagree
We would like to be able to run an individual lottery larger than the current
-47% -5% -17% 8% 6%
£4m ceiling
Agree
It is difficult to keep to the £10m annual income ceiling -42% -13% -27% 3% 4%
Agree strongly
-100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
“How does lottery regulation and administration affect your charity? How does lottery regulation and administration
affect your charity? ” Ranked by Agree strongly/Agree
Base: 181 participants
Source: Jun 11, nfpSynergy 3
4. Attitudes towards lotteries - part 1
Lotteries are more regulated than any other area of our fundraising -33% -5% 0% 29% 23%
The current regulations for lotteries make it more difficult to generate
-38% -2%
-10% 20% 15%
income from lotteries
The need to account for every ticket involves extra costs for us -48% -1%
-7% 20% 15%
The need to account for every ticket distributed (when sending more than
-38% -1%
-10% 23% 9%
£20 worth to cold prospects) and then returned involves extra…
We find the limit on prize money/value restrictive -53% -1%
-7% 16% 12%
The current regulations for lotteries increase our costs -51% -4%
-4% 16% 9%
Not sure/Not relevant
It is difficult to achieve the 20% minimum return to the beneficiary when
-39% -6% -14% 17% 6%
recruiting from cold prospects Disagree strongly
We find it difficult to avoid infringing the Gambling Commission/ Local Disagree
-34% -3% -19% 7% 11%
Authority regulations
Neither agree nor disagree
We would like to be able to run an individual lottery larger than the current
-47% -5% -17% 8% 6%
£4m ceiling
Agree
It is difficult to keep to the £10m annual income ceiling -42% -13% -27% 3% 4%
Agree strongly
-100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
“How does lottery regulation and administration affect your charity? How does lottery regulation and administration
affect your charity? ” Ranked by Agree strongly/Agree
Base: 181 participants
Source: Jun 11, nfpSynergy 4
5. Attitudes towards lotteries - part 1
Lotteries are more regulated than any other area of our fundraising -33% -5% 0% 29% 23%
The current regulations for lotteries make it more difficult to generate
-38% -2%
-10% 20% 15%
income from lotteries
The need to account for every ticket involves extra costs for us -48% -1%
-7% 20% 15%
The need to account for every ticket distributed (when sending more than
-38% -1%
-10% 23% 9%
£20 worth to cold prospects) and then returned involves extra…
We find the limit on prize money/value restrictive -53% -1%
-7% 16% 12%
The current regulations for lotteries increase our costs -51% -4%
-4% 16% 9%
Not sure/Not relevant
It is difficult to achieve the 20% minimum return to the beneficiary when
-39% -6% -14% 17% 6%
recruiting from cold prospects Disagree strongly
We find it difficult to avoid infringing the Gambling Commission/ Local Disagree
-34% -3% -19% 7% 11%
Authority regulations
Neither agree nor disagree
We would like to be able to run an individual lottery larger than the current
-47% -5% -17% 8% 6%
£4m ceiling
Agree
It is difficult to keep to the £10m annual income ceiling -42% -13% -27% 3% 4%
Agree strongly
-100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
“How does lottery regulation and administration affect your charity? How does lottery regulation and administration
affect your charity? ” Ranked by Agree strongly/Agree
Base: 181 participants
Source: Jun 11, nfpSynergy 5
6. Attitudes towards lotteries - part 1
Lotteries are more regulated than any other area of our fundraising -33% -5% 0% 29% 23%
The current regulations for lotteries make it more difficult to generate
-38% -2%
-10% 20% 15%
income from lotteries
The need to account for every ticket involves extra costs for us -48% -1%
-7% 20% 15%
The need to account for every ticket distributed (when sending more than
-38% -1%
-10% 23% 9%
£20 worth to cold prospects) and then returned involves extra…
We find the limit on prize money/value restrictive -53% -1%
-7% 16% 12%
The current regulations for lotteries increase our costs -51% -4%
-4% 16% 9%
Not sure/Not relevant
It is difficult to achieve the 20% minimum return to the beneficiary when
-39% -6% -14% 17% 6%
recruiting from cold prospects Disagree strongly
We find it difficult to avoid infringing the Gambling Commission/ Local Disagree
-34% -3% -19% 7% 11%
Authority regulations
Neither agree nor disagree
We would like to be able to run an individual lottery larger than the current
-47% -5% -17% 8% 6%
£4m ceiling
Agree
It is difficult to keep to the £10m annual income ceiling -42% -13% -27% 3% 4%
Agree strongly
-100% -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
“How does lottery regulation and administration affect your charity? How does lottery regulation and administration
affect your charity? ” Ranked by Agree strongly/Agree
Base: 181 participants
Source: Jun 11, nfpSynergy 6
7. Attitudes towards lotteries - part 2
Not sure/Not relevant Disagree strongly Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Agree Agree strongly
We find that lotteries appeal to a certain kind of donor -40% -1%
-1% 38% 8%
Our income from lotteries has increased over the last two
-33% -3%
-8% 35% 6%
years
We would be interested in exploring being part of a coalition
-43% -1%
-6% 28% 4%
to run larger lotteries with bigger prizes
We expect our income from lotteries to increase over the
-46% -1%
-4% 29% 3%
next two years
We have found that lottery income has held up well during
-41% -2%
-12% 24% 7%
the recession
We find lottery ticket buyers tend to give in a variety of other
-36% -7%-15% 22% 7%
ways as well
We have found online lotteries very successful -69% -2%
-7% 5% 1%
-100 -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
%
“Please state to what degree you agree/disagree with the statements below ” Ranked by Agree strongly/Agree
Base: 181 participants
Source: Jun 11, nfpSynergy 7
8. Attitudes towards lotteries - part 2
Not sure/Not relevant Disagree strongly Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Agree Agree strongly
We find that lotteries appeal to a certain kind of donor -40% -1%
-1% 38% 8%
Our income from lotteries has increased over the last two
-33% -3%
-8% 35% 6%
years
We would be interested in exploring being part of a coalition
-43% -1%
-6% 28% 4%
to run larger lotteries with bigger prizes
We expect our income from lotteries to increase over the
-46% -1%
-4% 29% 3%
next two years
We have found that lottery income has held up well during
-41% -2%
-12% 24% 7%
the recession
We find lottery ticket buyers tend to give in a variety of other
-36% -7%-15% 22% 7%
ways as well
We have found online lotteries very successful -69% -2%
-7% 5% 1%
-100 -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
%
“Please state to what degree you agree/disagree with the statements below ” Ranked by Agree strongly/Agree
Base: 181 participants
Source: Jun 11, nfpSynergy 8
9. Attitudes towards lotteries - part 2
Not sure/Not relevant Disagree strongly Disagree Neither agree nor disagree Agree Agree strongly
We find that lotteries appeal to a certain kind of donor -40% -1%
-1% 38% 8%
Our income from lotteries has increased over the last two
-33% -3%
-8% 35% 6%
years
We would be interested in exploring being part of a coalition
-43% -1%
-6% 28% 4%
to run larger lotteries with bigger prizes
We expect our income from lotteries to increase over the
-46% -1%
-4% 29% 3%
next two years
We have found that lottery income has held up well during
-41% -2%
-12% 24% 7%
the recession
We find lottery ticket buyers tend to give in a variety of other
-36% -7%-15% 22% 7%
ways as well
We have found online lotteries very successful -69% -2%
-7% 5% 1%
-100 -80% -60% -40% -20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
%
“Please state to what degree you agree/disagree with the statements below ” Ranked by Agree strongly/Agree
Base: 181 participants
9
Source: Jun 11, nfpSynergy
10. How much money did participants raise from lotteries
54%
11% 12%
9%
6%
4% 4%
£0-50k £51-100k £101-250k £251-1000k £1001-4000k £4001k + Don't know
How much annual income do you get from lottery ticket sales?
Base: 157 participants
Source: Jun 11, nfpSynergy 10
11. How much donated income did respondents raise
from lotteries
62%
17%
6% 7%
3% 3% 2%
£0-25k £26-50k £51-100k £101-250k £251-500k £501k + Don't know
How much annual income do you get from donations with lottery ticket sales?
Base: 155 participants
Source: Jun 11, nfpSynergy 11
12. How many people took part in respondents’ lotteries
69%
15%
6% 5%
4%
1%
0-10k 10-25k 26-50k 51-100k 101-200k 201k +
Approximately how many individuals buy lottery tickets from your organisation every year?
Base: 148 participants
Source: Jun 11, nfpSynergy 12
13. How many lotteries did respondents run a year
57%
20%
15%
3% 4%
1%
1 to 2 3 to 5 6 to 10 11 to 15 16 to 25 26+
Please indicate how many lotteries you run each year?
Base: 109 participants
Source: Jun 11, nfpSynergy 13
14. What do the general public
think about lotteries?
15. Key statistics 57%
think lotteries run
46% by charities should
be able to compete
Opposed to with the National
capping the size of Lottery and the
charity lotteries Health Lottery
12%
played Health
Lottery in last
54%
played National
month 61%
Lottery in last Opposed to laws
month and regulations
which stop any
68% other lotteries from
Opposed to capping raising as much
the number of tickets money as the
charity lotteries can National Lottery
21% sell
played a charity
lottery in last month
15
16. Demographics of lottery players
100%
90%
National Lottery Other lottery or raffle (eg school, charity, etc) Health Lottery
80%
70%
70%
60% 60%
60% 57% 58% 58%
54% 53%
51% 51% 52%
49%
50%
40%
31%
30%
24% 25%
23% 23% 23% 23%
21% 20% 20% 21% 20%
20% 18% 18% 18% 18%
12% 13% 12% 13%
10% 11% 11% 10% 11%
10% 6% 6%
0%
Total Male Female AB C1 C2 DE 16-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+
“Have you bought a ticket from the National Lottery/Health Lottery/any other lottery or raffle (e.g. school, charity, etc) in
the last month?” Yes
Base: 1,000 adults 16+, Britain.
Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Mar 12, nfpSynergy 16
17. “Do you think that lotteries run by charities should be able to
compete with the National Lottery and the Health Lottery?”
100%
90% 18%
24% 26% 25% 25%
27%
33% 28% 26% 26% 26% 29% 28%
35% 31%
80%
17% Not sure
70%
14% 14% 16% 15%
16% 20% 19% 12%
16% 16%
13% 24%
60%
15% 19%
No
50%
40%
Yes
65%
30% 61% 60% 58% 60% 60%
57% 56% 56% 55% 56% 56%
50% 50% 49%
20%
10%
0%
Total Male Female AB C1 C2 DE 16-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Recent Non
charity donor
donor
Base: 1,000 adults 16+, Britain.
Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Mar 12, nfpSynergy 17
18. 61% opposed to laws and regulations stopping any
other lotteries raising as much as the National Lottery
100%
90% 21%
27% 25% 25% 26% 26% 23% 23% 25% 26% 28%
32% 30% 29%
33%
80%
Not sure
70%
60%
No
50%
64% 61%
60% 63%
61% 64% 56% 63% 62% 59% 64% 61% 61%
40% 58%
60% Yes
30%
20%
10%
15% 15% 12% 13% 16%
12% 10% 11% 14% 12% 12% 11% 12% 11%
7%
0%
Total Male Female AB C1 C2 DE 16-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Recent Non
charity donor
donor
“Do you think that there should be laws and regulations which stop any other lotteries from raising as much money as
the National Lottery does?”
Base: 1,000 adults 16+, Britain.
Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Mar 12, nfpSynergy 18
19. Balance of opinion against charity lottery prizes being
capped
100%
21% 17% 19% 16% 14% 19%
90%
24% 20% 21% 22% 20% 21% 24%
28% 27%
80%
Not sure
70%
38%
36% 44%
60%
46% 49% 45%
46% 49% 46% No
43% 50% 50%
50% 50%
51% 48%
40%
Yes
30%
48%
44%
20% 40%
34% 34% 33% 33% 36%
29% 32% 32%
28% 26%
10% 22% 25%
0%
Total Male Female AB C1 C2 DE 16-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Recent Non
charity donor
donor
“Do you think that the size of the prizes in charity lotteries should be capped?”
Base: 1,000 adults 16+, Britain.
Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Mar 12, nfpSynergy 19
20. Very few think the number of tickets sold by an
individual charity lottery should be capped
100%
16% 18%
90% 19% 23% 20% 19% 22% 19% 18%
22%
18% 16% 18% 23%
25%
80%
Not sure
70%
60%
No
50% 72% 68% 67% 68%
68% 65% 68% 69% 71% 66% 72% 63% 71% 67%
70%
40%
Yes
30%
20%
10%
16%
12% 13% 12% 12% 13% 12% 12% 9% 12% 11% 11% 14% 14%
8%
0%
Total Male Female AB C1 C2 DE 16-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65+ Recent Non
charity donor
donor
“Do you think the size (i.e. number of tickets sold) of an individual charity lottery should be capped?”
Base: 1,000 adults 16+, Britain.
Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Mar 12, nfpSynergy 20
22. The campaign: to deregulate lotteries to reduce
costs and allow more money to be raised
• Organisations involved: The Lotteries Council, Institute of
Fundraising, CAF, nfpSynergy, People Postcode
Lottery, Brightsource, 121 Fundraising, The Woods Group, and
Rogavi.
• The aim: to allow charities raise more money at lower cost
with less hassle than currently
• The timing: Consultation now open and ends on May 28th
• Our aim: to get as many organisations as possible to sign up
to our aims and then use that support to lobby government
and the Gambling Commission
22
23. Changing the 80:20 rule
• The issue: Lottery regulations state that 20% of the
proceeds should go to the beneficiary
• The problem: its very difficult to build up new lotteries
from „cold‟ and keep to this regulation
• The solution: make the 80:20 rule apply over time and
across all a charities‟ lotteries
• But – should we have the 80:20 rule at all
23
24. Remove age verification for 16 and 17 year
olds
• The issue: Online lotteries need to provide age
verification for anyone buying tickets by debit card in
case they are under age
• The problem: its very expensive to age verify online
negating any income from debit card purchasers
• The solution: carry out random „spot checks‟ for debit
card users rather than blanket verification
24
25. Dual registration for remote and non-remote
lotteries
• The issue: the same lottery carried out
online/telephone and via paper must be separately
registered
• The problem: its makes dual lotteries twice the hassle
for no obvious reason
• The solution: assimilate remote and non-remote
licences into one registration based on the standards of
non-remote licences
25
26. Allow cloak-room tickets in exempt lotteries
• The issue: The legislation requires confirmation for
ticket purchasers in exempt lotteries
• The problem: this technically makes the use of
cloakroom tickets in exempt lotteries illegal
• The solution: permit the use of standard pre-printed
“cloakroom” tickets in exempt lotteries
26
27. Give charity lotteries proportionate
regulation to the gambling risk they pose
• The issue: Charities lotteries are regulated as if they
were casinos
• The problem: Charities get the heavy hand of
regulation despite the fact there is no evidence that
charity lotteries cause any problem gambling
• The solution: create a dedicated charity team and
processes at the Gambling Commission, raise the
threshold for GC regulation to £1 million and create a
central stop list of people who wish to be exempt from
lottery mailing
27
28. Remove the turnover limits on charity
lotteries
• The issue: charity lotteries are capped both in terms of
their turnover and their prize money
• The problem: this makes it harder for charities to „go
large‟ in terms of their lottery fundraising
• The solution: remove the turnover limits altogether for
charity lotteries
28
29. What next?
• We have completed the consultation and are now
analysing the response.
• Once we are clear that we have the support of the body
of charity lottery operators we will go to the Gambling
Commission and DCMS to make our case
• Any questions?
29
30. What should charity CEOs be paid?
Perceptions of acceptable and actual
salaries
Joe Saxton
July 2012
32. Perceived acceptable salaries for different professions
Chief executive of a large company
(annual turnover over £10m)
1%4% 11% 19% 21% 16%
Bank Chief Executive 3% 8% 19% 21% 18% 10%
Chief executive of a medium sized
company (annual turnover £1m- £10m) 1% 9% 21% 26% 19% 5%
Hospital Chief Executive 2% 9% 22% 26% 19% 5%
GP0% 8% 26% 30% 20% 3%
Member of Parliament 7% 17% 25% 26% 12% 2%
Chief executive of a small company
(annual turnover under £1m)
3% 19% 33% 21% 11% 1%
Charity Chief Executive 8% 26% 28% 18% 9% 1%
Nurse 3% 56% 26% 6% 2%1%
Social Worker 9% 57% 22% 5% 1%
0%
Bus driver 24% 63% 6% 1%
0%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Under £20,000 £20,001 - £40,000 £40,001 - £60,000 £60,001 - £80,000 £80,001 - £100,000 £100, 001 - £120,000 £120,000 - £140,000 Over £140,000 Not sure
“How much do you think each of the following should be paid?”
Base: 1,000 adults 16+, Britain.
Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Mar 12, nfpSynergy 32
33. Mean acceptable salaries for different professions
£100,000
£90,107
£90,000 Mean score- Nov 09 Mean score- Mar 12
£78,183
£80,000 £73,245
£72,113
£69,376
£70,000
£58,025 £58,903
£60,000
£51,826
£50,000
£40,941
£40,000 £36,453
£30,000 £27,350
£20,000
£10,000
£0
Bus driver Social Nurse Charity Chief Member of GP Hospital Chief Bank Chief Chief
Worker Chief executive Parliament Chief executive Executive executive
Executive of a small Executive of a of a large
company medium company
(annual sized (annual
turnover company turnover
under (annual over
£1m) turnover £10m*)
£1m-
£10m)
“How much do you think each of the following should be paid?”
* Turnover not specified in Nov 09
Base: 1,000 adults 16+, Britain.
Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Mar 12, nfpSynergy 33
34. Mean acceptable salaries for chief executives of
different size charities
£80,000
£69,376
£70,000
£62,352
£58,025 £58,903
£60,000
£51,269
£50,000
£40,941
£40,000 £38,414
£30,000 £27,350
£20,000
£10,000
£0
Bus driver Chief executive Nurse Chief executive Chief executive Member of Chief executive GP
of a small of a medium of a small Parliament of a large
charity (annual sized charity company charity (annual
turnover under (annual (annual turnover over
£1m) turnover £1m- turnover under £10m)
£10m) £1m)
“Thinking about chief executives of different types of charities, how much do you think each of the following should be
paid?”
Base: 1,000 adults 16+, Britain.
34
Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Mar 12, nfpSynergy
35. Perceptions of how much different professions
are actually paid
£140,000
Mean score- Mar 12
£117,524
£120,000 £112,632
£98,932
£100,000 £91,609
£85,787
£81,807
£80,000 £74,674 £75,636
£60,000
£40,000
£29,850 £32,135
£24,452
£20,000
£0
Bus driver Nurse Social Chief Charity GP Member of Chief Hospital Chief Bank Chief
Worker executive Chief Parliament executive Chief executive Executive
of a small Executive of a Executive of a large
company medium company
(annual sized (annual
turnover company turnover
under (annual over £10m)
£1m) turnover
£1m-
£10m)
“How much do you think each of the following are paid on average?”
Base: 1,000 adults 16+, Britain.
Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Mar 12, nfpSynergy 35
36. Gap between perceived actual and acceptable
salaries
£140,000
Actual Acceptable £117,524
£120,000 £112,632
£98,932
£100,000 £91,609 £90,107
£85,787
£81,807
£80,000 £74,674 £75,636 £73,245 £72,113
£78,183
£69,376
£58,025 £58,903
£60,000 £51,826
£40,941
£36,453
£40,000 £32,135
£27,350 £29,850
£24,452
£20,000
£0
Bus driver Nurse Social Chief Charity GP Member of Chief Hospital Chief Bank Chief
Worker executive of Chief Parliament executive of Chief executive of Executive
a small Executive a medium Executive a large
company sized company
(annual company (annual
turnover (annual turnover
under £1m) turnover over £10m)
£1m-
£10m)
“How much do you think each of the following should be paid?” Mean
“How much do you think each of the following are paid on average?” Mean
Base: 1,000 adults 16+, Britain.
Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Mar 12, nfpSynergy 36
37. Ratio between perceived actual and acceptable
salaries
£2
Ratio 1.46 1.46 1.50
1.37
£1 1.29
1.25 1.25
1.18
£1
£1 0.88 0.89
£1 0.73
£1
£0
£0
£0
Nurse Social Bus driver GP Chief Chief Chief Hospital Member of Charity Bank Chief
Worker executive of executive of executive of Chief Parliament Chief Executive
a large a medium a small Executive Executive
company sized company
(annual company (annual
turnover (annual turnover
over £10m) turnover under £1m)
£1m-
£10m)
“How much do you think each of the following should be paid?” Mean
“How much do you think each of the following are paid on average?” Mean
Base: 1,000 adults 16+, Britain.
Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Mar 12, nfpSynergy 37
38. Gap between perceived actual and acceptable
salaries for charity chief executives
£100,000
£89,603
£90,000
Actual Acceptable
£80,000
£72,698
£70,000
£62,352
£60,000
£54,861
£51,269
£50,000
£40,000
£38,414
£30,000
£20,000
£10,000
£0
Chief executive of a small charity (annual Chief executive of a medium sized charity Chief executive of a large charity (annual
income under £1m) (annual income £1m- £10m) income over £10m)
“How much do you think each of the following should be paid?” Mean
“How much do you think each of the following are paid on average?” Mean
Base: 1,000 adults 16+, Britain.
Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Mar 12, nfpSynergy 38
39. What does all this mean?
• We are quite a socialist nation at heart!
• We think bus drivers, nurses and social workers are underpaid
• Everyone else is has an actual salary higher than their ideal.
• Charity CEOs are nestled between bank chief executives and
MPs in terms of the ratio of being seen as overpaid
• So although charities actually salaries of CEOs are not as high
as some others, the acceptable salaries are that much lower
• We need to do some communications work for the sector to
show why CEOs are great value for money and worth what
they are paid.
39
40. Methodology
Dates
23rd March – 2nd April 2012
Sample A nationally representative sample of 1,000
adults, 16+ in Britain
Methodology
Online survey
Fieldwork
Fieldwork carried out for nfpSynergy by Research
Now
40
41. Basic demographics of respondents
100%
South West and •The socio-economic classification
90% 65+, 19% Wales, 14% system we use consists of six social
AB, 26%
grades which classify the household
80% South East, 14% social status based on the occupation
Female, 52% 55-64, 14%
of the Chief Income Earner (so if a
70% casual worker lives with a parent or
Scotland, 9%
spouse who is a doctor they'll be an A
60% C1, 30% rather than an E);
45-54, 16%
North West, 12%
50% -AB - higher (A) or intermediate (B)
North East,
Yorkshire and managerial, administrative or
40% 35-44, 19% Humberside, professional
13%
-C1 - supervisory or clerical, and
C2, 20%
30%
junior managerial, administrative or
Midlands, 17%
professional
Male, 48% 25-34, 14%
20%
-C2 - skilled manual workers
London, 10%
-DE - semi-skilled and unskilled
DE, 24% workers (D) & state pensioners, casual
10%
16-24, 17%
East of England, or lowest grade workers (E)
10%
0%
Gender Age Social grade Region
Base: 1,000 adults 16+, Britain.
Source: Charity Awareness Monitor, Mar 12, nfpSynergy 41
42. www.nfpsynergy.
net
2-6 Tenter Ground
Spitalfields
London E1 7NH
020 7426 8888
insight@nfpsynergy.net
www.twitter.com/nfpsynergy
www.linkedin.com/company/nfpsynergy
Registered office: 2-6 Tenter Ground Spitalfields London E1 7NH. Registered in England No. 04387900. VAT Registration 839 8186 72