1) INTRODUCTION TO FAMILY COURT
2) THE RELATED STATUTES AND RULES
3) REGISTRATION OF CASES
4) PROCEDURES
5) DECREE NISI & PROCEEDINGS THEREAFTER
6) EXECUTION & ENFORCEMENT OF ORDERS
The document discusses the law on striking out pleadings in Malaysia. It defines what can be struck out, who can apply, the grounds for an application, and the procedure. A party may apply to strike out all or part of the opposing party's pleadings. Grounds for striking out include if there is no reasonable cause of action or defence, or if the pleadings are scandalous, frivolous, vexatious, or an abuse of court process. The application must be made promptly, preferably before the close of pleadings, and state the specific grounds and order sought.
The document discusses the procedures for entering an appearance and obtaining a judgment in default of appearance (JIDA) under Malaysian civil procedure rules.
It explains that once served with a writ, the defendant must enter an appearance within a specified time limit, usually 14 days. Failure to do so allows the plaintiff to obtain a JIDA. A JIDA can be final, for liquidated sums, or interlocutory, requiring damages to be assessed.
The defendant can apply to set aside a JIDA within 30 days. For irregular judgments obtained not in compliance with rules, the JIDA can be set aside as of right. For regular judgments, the defendant must show they have a defense on the merits by disclosing evidence
Writ, service, appearance & judgment in default (2017-2018)Intan Muhammad
Writ - includes endorsement , transfer, issuance of writ
Service - includes substitute/personal service, serve based on contract, serve to solicitor / partnership, AOS
Appearance - includes how and when to insert appearance
JID - includes type and proof of services
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
The document discusses bail amounts set in three criminal cases in Malaysia. In the first case, bail of RM70,000 was set for a man charged with 14 offenses related to insulting the Johor royal family, which many viewed as excessive given the charges and the man's financial means. In the second case, bail of RM5,000 was set for a sedition charge, which matched the maximum fine amount and was also seen as unjustifiably high. In the third case, bail of RM15,000 was set for a prominent opposition figure charged with criminal defamation, which some argued was still excessive despite being lower than what prosecutors requested. The document analyzes factors courts typically consider for bail amounts and concludes the
The contents are listed in the 1st page of the note :) credit goes to Dr Munzil for the amazing comprehensive notes, I just added / rearranged few parts to ease my understanding.
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves everyday, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
The document discusses the law on striking out pleadings in Malaysia. It defines what can be struck out, who can apply, the grounds for an application, and the procedure. A party may apply to strike out all or part of the opposing party's pleadings. Grounds for striking out include if there is no reasonable cause of action or defence, or if the pleadings are scandalous, frivolous, vexatious, or an abuse of court process. The application must be made promptly, preferably before the close of pleadings, and state the specific grounds and order sought.
The document discusses the procedures for entering an appearance and obtaining a judgment in default of appearance (JIDA) under Malaysian civil procedure rules.
It explains that once served with a writ, the defendant must enter an appearance within a specified time limit, usually 14 days. Failure to do so allows the plaintiff to obtain a JIDA. A JIDA can be final, for liquidated sums, or interlocutory, requiring damages to be assessed.
The defendant can apply to set aside a JIDA within 30 days. For irregular judgments obtained not in compliance with rules, the JIDA can be set aside as of right. For regular judgments, the defendant must show they have a defense on the merits by disclosing evidence
Writ, service, appearance & judgment in default (2017-2018)Intan Muhammad
Writ - includes endorsement , transfer, issuance of writ
Service - includes substitute/personal service, serve based on contract, serve to solicitor / partnership, AOS
Appearance - includes how and when to insert appearance
JID - includes type and proof of services
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
The document discusses bail amounts set in three criminal cases in Malaysia. In the first case, bail of RM70,000 was set for a man charged with 14 offenses related to insulting the Johor royal family, which many viewed as excessive given the charges and the man's financial means. In the second case, bail of RM5,000 was set for a sedition charge, which matched the maximum fine amount and was also seen as unjustifiably high. In the third case, bail of RM15,000 was set for a prominent opposition figure charged with criminal defamation, which some argued was still excessive despite being lower than what prosecutors requested. The document analyzes factors courts typically consider for bail amounts and concludes the
The contents are listed in the 1st page of the note :) credit goes to Dr Munzil for the amazing comprehensive notes, I just added / rearranged few parts to ease my understanding.
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves everyday, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
Third party proceeding & summary judgementASMAH CHE WAN
Third party proceedings allow a defendant in a lawsuit to add additional parties that may be wholly or partly liable for the claim. A defendant can initiate third party proceedings if they claim contribution, indemnity, or require determination of an issue regarding the subject matter of the claim. A third party served with notice will be bound by the judgment if they do not enter an appearance or defend the claim.
Summary judgment allows a plaintiff to obtain a judgment without a full trial if the defendant's defense has no merit or raises no triable issues. To obtain summary judgment, the plaintiff must show the defendant has entered an appearance, been served with the statement of claim, and submit an affidavit verifying the claim and stating there is no defense
Execution and enforcement of judgment and order
Writ of seizure and sale
Stay of Execution
WRIT OF POSSESSION
WRIT OF DELIVERY
GENERAL RULES IN RESPECT OF WRIT OF EXECUTION
ENFORCEMENT OF MONEY JUDGEMENT
GARNISHEE PROCEEDINGS
CHARGING ORDERS TO STOP ORDER
APPOINTMENT OF RECEIVER (O51)
JUDGMENT DEBTOR SUMMONS
COMMITAL
WRIT OF DISTRESS
Relevancy of evidence under Section 6 of Evidence Act 1950Intan Muhammad
1) Section 6 of the Evidence Act 1957 incorporates the common law doctrine of res gestae. It allows facts that form part of the same transaction to be admitted as evidence, even if they occurred at different times and places.
2) For a fact to be considered part of the same transaction under Section 6, there must be (i) proximity of time, (ii) unity/proximity of place, and (iii) continuity of action/purpose. The time gap can be expanded to accept facts occurring over several days or months as long as these criteria are met.
3) Both acts and statements can be considered res gestae and admitted under Section 6. Statements of those present like bystanders
Confession under Malaysian Evidence Act 1950Intan Muhammad
The document discusses the definitions and principles related to confessions and admissions in evidence law. It begins by defining a confession as an admission stating or suggesting that the accused committed the offence. A confession can be plenary (full acknowledgment of guilt) or non-plenary (incriminating statement suggesting guilt). All confessions are admissions but not all admissions are confessions. The document then examines circumstances where confessions may be excluded, such as if they were obtained through inducement, threat or promise by a person in authority. It also discusses exceptions where a confession can still be admitted, such as if the improper influence has been removed. The document analyzes several key court cases related to these principles.
Administration of trust / past year attempt - april 2010 part cFAROUQ
Robert left a will dividing his estate among his relatives. His executor, David, has questions about the validity of the will and the beneficiaries. The will is valid as it was in writing, signed by Robert, and witnessed by two people as required by law. Nicole is entitled to the house as evidence suggests she was Robert's favorite sister. Joe is only entitled to RM50,000 of the RM100,000 bank gift as the account held less. Kevin is entitled to the 10,000 remaining shares as the gift was general. Sandra is entitled to the car as an exception to lapse applies when the original beneficiary dies with issue.
Trustees have several key duties under trust law:
1) Act in accordance with the terms of the trust deed.
2) Familiarize themselves with the trust terms and ensure trust properties are properly vested.
3) Convert speculative or non-income producing investments to provide income for beneficiaries.
4) Provide information and accounts to beneficiaries regarding the trust fund and properties.
5) Distribute trust properties to the proper beneficiaries.
This document discusses the parol evidence rule in contract law in Malaysia. It provides definitions of key concepts like contracts and the parol evidence rule. The main points are:
1) Sections 91 and 92 of Malaysia's Evidence Act 1950 govern the parol evidence rule - oral evidence cannot contradict a written contract except in specific exceptions.
2) There have been different interpretations by courts on when oral evidence can be admitted, with some cases taking a stricter view to protect the written terms.
3) Collateral contracts, being separate oral promises existing alongside the written contract, are one way oral evidence can be admitted without violating the parol evidence rule.
This document outlines the factors a judge must consider when deciding whether to grant an interlocutory injunction. The judge must first determine if there is a serious issue to be tried by examining the pleadings and issues raised, without making a determination on the merits. Second, the judge must consider where the interests of justice lie by weighing the harm of granting or refusing the injunction, the parties' financial standing, and the ability of the plaintiff to pay damages if the suit fails. Finally, the remedy of an injunction is discretionary and intended to preserve the status quo until trial, so it should not be granted if damages are adequate.
The document discusses the concepts of bare trust and stakeholder under Malaysian law. It begins by explaining that a solicitor stakeholder temporarily holds money or property while its owner is still being determined, such as money paid by a purchaser pending registration of a property transfer. It then summarizes two key Malaysian cases on stakeholders. The document also discusses the English common law position on bare trusts, where the vendor becomes a bare trustee once a valid sale contract exists. However, under Malaysian law bare trustee status only arises after full payment and execution of a valid transfer, as established in another case summarized. The key differences between the common law and Malaysian positions on bare trusts are also outlined.
The document discusses the writ as a mode of originating process in court. It provides details on:
- The requirements for a writ to be deemed issued, including being numbered, signed, dated and sealed.
- The importance of the date of issue, which determines limitation periods and the lifespan of the writ.
- The options if a plaintiff's writ expires, such as issuing a new writ or applying to renew the writ.
- The rules regarding serving a writ on individuals and companies, including the various methods and exceptions.
The document discusses costs in legal proceedings in Malaysia. It provides definitions of key terms related to costs such as "costs", "costs reserved", and "costs in any event". It also discusses principles from case law that guide a court's discretion in ordering costs. The discretion is very wide but must be exercised judicially based on established principles. An appellate court will generally not interfere in a lower court's decision on costs unless there was an error of law or the discretion was exercised based on irrelevant grounds. Overall, the document provides an overview of how costs are treated in Malaysian courts and the considerations that determine whether costs are ordered.
The document discusses the nature of liens under Malaysian law. It defines a lien as a right to retain possession of property belonging to another person until a debt owed is satisfied. A lien is a form of security interest created when a property owner deposits the original title document of their land with a lender as security for a loan. For a statutory lien to be valid, the lender must lodge a lien-holder's caveat on the land with the land office. The document analyzes several court cases that discuss issues such as how liens are created, whether consent is needed to lodge a caveat, and priority of liens over other interests like charges or judgments.
MALAYSIAN LEGAL SYSTEM on civil & criminal exam notesFAROUQ
This document discusses preliminary matters in civil procedure regarding parties in an action. It covers requirements for parties such as being sui juris and compos mentis. It also discusses types of parties like individuals, firms, companies, deceased estates, and representatives. The document then discusses cause of action, locus standi, limitation periods, and commencing an action through a writ. It outlines the process for issuing, serving, renewing and substituting service of a writ, as well as timelines for appearance. The key information provided is on the requirements for valid parties in a civil action and the procedures for commencing a case through issuance and service of a writ.
Contents :
Definition
Importance
Attendance
Appearance
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
Parol Evidence Rule Contract Law MalaysiaAzri Nadiah
The document discusses the parol evidence rule and its exceptions in Malaysian contract law. The parol evidence rule bars oral evidence that would contradict or vary the terms of a written contract. However, there are exceptions, including when (1) the contract is partly oral and partly written, (2) there is evidence of fraud, mistake or misrepresentation, or (3) there is evidence of a collateral contract. A collateral contract refers to a separate oral agreement made alongside the written contract. For a collateral contract to be valid, the party must strictly prove that the oral terms were intended to be binding and induced them to enter the contract. The document analyzes several cases that discuss and apply the parol evidence rule and its exceptions.
Land Law II notes - For Revision Purposes OnlyAzrin Hafiz
This document summarizes 11 land law cases related to jual janji (conditional sale) transactions and lien cases in Malaysia. It provides brief summaries of the facts and outcomes of each case. The cases cover topics such as whether a transaction constituted a jual janji or outright sale, the right to redeem land after the agreed repayment period has expired, and priority of claims when charges or liens on land are involved.
Plaintif (Uniasia General Insurance Berhad) menuntut kepemilikan hartanah Lot 951 yang saat ini diduduki defendan tanpa izin, dan meminta mahkamah memerintahkan defendan mengosongkan hartanah tersebut dan membayar biaya permohonan.
This document provides an outline and explanation of key concepts related to documentary evidence under Malaysian law, including:
- The definition of a document and various examples.
- The process of authenticating documentary evidence, which involves first proving the genuineness of the document and then proving its content.
- Requirements for proving genuineness, including calling the author as a witness or proving handwriting. If these requirements are not met, the document constitutes inadmissible hearsay.
- Requirements for proving content, including introducing the original document as primary evidence and allowing secondary evidence like copies only in certain situations.
The document discusses relevant sections of the Malaysian Evidence Act and case law examples to illustrate proper
Family Law Practice : Malaysia Holistic ApproachTong Tim
A non-traditional approach to Family Law practice is sorely needed in Malaysia. A lawyer can find much real satisfaction in rendering holistic service to their divorcing client.
Cindy Cruz-Cabrera and Darlene Caramanzana worked with the Center of Women's Resources, a non-profit organization that conducts research and training for women, particularly grassroots women, as their fieldwork at the Department of Women and Development Studies at the University of the Philippines College of Social Work and Community Development. This presentation covered the second half of their fieldwork for the second semester AY2012-2013 - including their findings for the research on violence against women for Darlene,and the literacy and numeracy program for grassroots women for Cindy.
Third party proceeding & summary judgementASMAH CHE WAN
Third party proceedings allow a defendant in a lawsuit to add additional parties that may be wholly or partly liable for the claim. A defendant can initiate third party proceedings if they claim contribution, indemnity, or require determination of an issue regarding the subject matter of the claim. A third party served with notice will be bound by the judgment if they do not enter an appearance or defend the claim.
Summary judgment allows a plaintiff to obtain a judgment without a full trial if the defendant's defense has no merit or raises no triable issues. To obtain summary judgment, the plaintiff must show the defendant has entered an appearance, been served with the statement of claim, and submit an affidavit verifying the claim and stating there is no defense
Execution and enforcement of judgment and order
Writ of seizure and sale
Stay of Execution
WRIT OF POSSESSION
WRIT OF DELIVERY
GENERAL RULES IN RESPECT OF WRIT OF EXECUTION
ENFORCEMENT OF MONEY JUDGEMENT
GARNISHEE PROCEEDINGS
CHARGING ORDERS TO STOP ORDER
APPOINTMENT OF RECEIVER (O51)
JUDGMENT DEBTOR SUMMONS
COMMITAL
WRIT OF DISTRESS
Relevancy of evidence under Section 6 of Evidence Act 1950Intan Muhammad
1) Section 6 of the Evidence Act 1957 incorporates the common law doctrine of res gestae. It allows facts that form part of the same transaction to be admitted as evidence, even if they occurred at different times and places.
2) For a fact to be considered part of the same transaction under Section 6, there must be (i) proximity of time, (ii) unity/proximity of place, and (iii) continuity of action/purpose. The time gap can be expanded to accept facts occurring over several days or months as long as these criteria are met.
3) Both acts and statements can be considered res gestae and admitted under Section 6. Statements of those present like bystanders
Confession under Malaysian Evidence Act 1950Intan Muhammad
The document discusses the definitions and principles related to confessions and admissions in evidence law. It begins by defining a confession as an admission stating or suggesting that the accused committed the offence. A confession can be plenary (full acknowledgment of guilt) or non-plenary (incriminating statement suggesting guilt). All confessions are admissions but not all admissions are confessions. The document then examines circumstances where confessions may be excluded, such as if they were obtained through inducement, threat or promise by a person in authority. It also discusses exceptions where a confession can still be admitted, such as if the improper influence has been removed. The document analyzes several key court cases related to these principles.
Administration of trust / past year attempt - april 2010 part cFAROUQ
Robert left a will dividing his estate among his relatives. His executor, David, has questions about the validity of the will and the beneficiaries. The will is valid as it was in writing, signed by Robert, and witnessed by two people as required by law. Nicole is entitled to the house as evidence suggests she was Robert's favorite sister. Joe is only entitled to RM50,000 of the RM100,000 bank gift as the account held less. Kevin is entitled to the 10,000 remaining shares as the gift was general. Sandra is entitled to the car as an exception to lapse applies when the original beneficiary dies with issue.
Trustees have several key duties under trust law:
1) Act in accordance with the terms of the trust deed.
2) Familiarize themselves with the trust terms and ensure trust properties are properly vested.
3) Convert speculative or non-income producing investments to provide income for beneficiaries.
4) Provide information and accounts to beneficiaries regarding the trust fund and properties.
5) Distribute trust properties to the proper beneficiaries.
This document discusses the parol evidence rule in contract law in Malaysia. It provides definitions of key concepts like contracts and the parol evidence rule. The main points are:
1) Sections 91 and 92 of Malaysia's Evidence Act 1950 govern the parol evidence rule - oral evidence cannot contradict a written contract except in specific exceptions.
2) There have been different interpretations by courts on when oral evidence can be admitted, with some cases taking a stricter view to protect the written terms.
3) Collateral contracts, being separate oral promises existing alongside the written contract, are one way oral evidence can be admitted without violating the parol evidence rule.
This document outlines the factors a judge must consider when deciding whether to grant an interlocutory injunction. The judge must first determine if there is a serious issue to be tried by examining the pleadings and issues raised, without making a determination on the merits. Second, the judge must consider where the interests of justice lie by weighing the harm of granting or refusing the injunction, the parties' financial standing, and the ability of the plaintiff to pay damages if the suit fails. Finally, the remedy of an injunction is discretionary and intended to preserve the status quo until trial, so it should not be granted if damages are adequate.
The document discusses the concepts of bare trust and stakeholder under Malaysian law. It begins by explaining that a solicitor stakeholder temporarily holds money or property while its owner is still being determined, such as money paid by a purchaser pending registration of a property transfer. It then summarizes two key Malaysian cases on stakeholders. The document also discusses the English common law position on bare trusts, where the vendor becomes a bare trustee once a valid sale contract exists. However, under Malaysian law bare trustee status only arises after full payment and execution of a valid transfer, as established in another case summarized. The key differences between the common law and Malaysian positions on bare trusts are also outlined.
The document discusses the writ as a mode of originating process in court. It provides details on:
- The requirements for a writ to be deemed issued, including being numbered, signed, dated and sealed.
- The importance of the date of issue, which determines limitation periods and the lifespan of the writ.
- The options if a plaintiff's writ expires, such as issuing a new writ or applying to renew the writ.
- The rules regarding serving a writ on individuals and companies, including the various methods and exceptions.
The document discusses costs in legal proceedings in Malaysia. It provides definitions of key terms related to costs such as "costs", "costs reserved", and "costs in any event". It also discusses principles from case law that guide a court's discretion in ordering costs. The discretion is very wide but must be exercised judicially based on established principles. An appellate court will generally not interfere in a lower court's decision on costs unless there was an error of law or the discretion was exercised based on irrelevant grounds. Overall, the document provides an overview of how costs are treated in Malaysian courts and the considerations that determine whether costs are ordered.
The document discusses the nature of liens under Malaysian law. It defines a lien as a right to retain possession of property belonging to another person until a debt owed is satisfied. A lien is a form of security interest created when a property owner deposits the original title document of their land with a lender as security for a loan. For a statutory lien to be valid, the lender must lodge a lien-holder's caveat on the land with the land office. The document analyzes several court cases that discuss issues such as how liens are created, whether consent is needed to lodge a caveat, and priority of liens over other interests like charges or judgments.
MALAYSIAN LEGAL SYSTEM on civil & criminal exam notesFAROUQ
This document discusses preliminary matters in civil procedure regarding parties in an action. It covers requirements for parties such as being sui juris and compos mentis. It also discusses types of parties like individuals, firms, companies, deceased estates, and representatives. The document then discusses cause of action, locus standi, limitation periods, and commencing an action through a writ. It outlines the process for issuing, serving, renewing and substituting service of a writ, as well as timelines for appearance. The key information provided is on the requirements for valid parties in a civil action and the procedures for commencing a case through issuance and service of a writ.
Contents :
Definition
Importance
Attendance
Appearance
P/S : I am sharing my personal notes of law-related subjects. Some parts of them are explained in a very informal-relaxed way and mix of languages (BM and English). Secondly, as law revolves every day, there will be outdated parts in my notes. Two ways of handling it.. (1) double check with the latest law and keep it to yourself (2) same with No. 1 coupled with your generosity to share with us, the LinkedIn users (hiks ^_^). Till then, have a nice day!
Parol Evidence Rule Contract Law MalaysiaAzri Nadiah
The document discusses the parol evidence rule and its exceptions in Malaysian contract law. The parol evidence rule bars oral evidence that would contradict or vary the terms of a written contract. However, there are exceptions, including when (1) the contract is partly oral and partly written, (2) there is evidence of fraud, mistake or misrepresentation, or (3) there is evidence of a collateral contract. A collateral contract refers to a separate oral agreement made alongside the written contract. For a collateral contract to be valid, the party must strictly prove that the oral terms were intended to be binding and induced them to enter the contract. The document analyzes several cases that discuss and apply the parol evidence rule and its exceptions.
Land Law II notes - For Revision Purposes OnlyAzrin Hafiz
This document summarizes 11 land law cases related to jual janji (conditional sale) transactions and lien cases in Malaysia. It provides brief summaries of the facts and outcomes of each case. The cases cover topics such as whether a transaction constituted a jual janji or outright sale, the right to redeem land after the agreed repayment period has expired, and priority of claims when charges or liens on land are involved.
Plaintif (Uniasia General Insurance Berhad) menuntut kepemilikan hartanah Lot 951 yang saat ini diduduki defendan tanpa izin, dan meminta mahkamah memerintahkan defendan mengosongkan hartanah tersebut dan membayar biaya permohonan.
This document provides an outline and explanation of key concepts related to documentary evidence under Malaysian law, including:
- The definition of a document and various examples.
- The process of authenticating documentary evidence, which involves first proving the genuineness of the document and then proving its content.
- Requirements for proving genuineness, including calling the author as a witness or proving handwriting. If these requirements are not met, the document constitutes inadmissible hearsay.
- Requirements for proving content, including introducing the original document as primary evidence and allowing secondary evidence like copies only in certain situations.
The document discusses relevant sections of the Malaysian Evidence Act and case law examples to illustrate proper
Family Law Practice : Malaysia Holistic ApproachTong Tim
A non-traditional approach to Family Law practice is sorely needed in Malaysia. A lawyer can find much real satisfaction in rendering holistic service to their divorcing client.
Cindy Cruz-Cabrera and Darlene Caramanzana worked with the Center of Women's Resources, a non-profit organization that conducts research and training for women, particularly grassroots women, as their fieldwork at the Department of Women and Development Studies at the University of the Philippines College of Social Work and Community Development. This presentation covered the second half of their fieldwork for the second semester AY2012-2013 - including their findings for the research on violence against women for Darlene,and the literacy and numeracy program for grassroots women for Cindy.
The document provides tips for effective money management. It recommends becoming financially independent by educating yourself, setting goals and priorities for spending, saving more than you spend to build wealth. Additionally, it suggests building an emergency fund, teaching children about savings, learning from mistakes, living within a budget, buying smart and in bulk, doing things yourself, and staying healthy. The overall message is that money management is key to financial security and success.
Financing Your Future Module 5 of Family Financial Freedom Floyd Saunders
The seminars are available to anyone including financial planners, and other professionals in the financial services industry who would like a set of the materials, participant's workbooks or the Family Financial Freedom book (discounts for volume purchases)You can now view the presentation here, order the Family Financial Freedom book from any of the ebook sites for iPhone, iPad, Kindle, Nook, Kobo reader etc. contact me at floyd.saunders@yahoo.com for a copy of the presentation or more information on how to get seminar materials.
This document discusses issues in family management and presents four key issues:
1) Globalization and technology can drive children away from spending time with family through excessive smartphone and social media use.
2) Polygamy is discussed in the context of Islamic law, noting it is allowed if the husband can treat all wives equitably, with increased taqwa, and afford their needs.
3) Financial management of the family is important, including proper budgeting and ensuring wives and husbands both contribute according to their means.
4) Workaholic parents who are too busy with work may neglect their children's needs despite economic security, while poor families struggle to find work-life balance.
This document discusses Islamic guidelines for managing personal and family finances. It begins by summarizing Muhammad Yunus' work establishing microcredit programs. It then outlines some causes of financial crises like greed and profit-driven businesses. Next, it provides spiritual and practical Islamic guidelines. These include living simply and within one's means, forbidding interest, encouraging charity, and discouraging hoarding of wealth. The document concludes by emphasizing equal roles and responsibilities between husbands and wives in maintaining financial peace in the household through caring attitudes and recognizing different roles.
Rakesh Mehta started Mehta Steel Corporation in 1977 which has grown to include two steel manufacturing units with an annual capacity of 20,000 tons. Mehta has three daughters, with the second daughter interested in and pursuing an MBA. Mehta does not currently have a succession plan in place. Choosing a successor from within the family risks nepotism and lack of qualifications, while going outside the family risks lack of commitment, but involving potential successors now and grooming them could help ensure a smooth transition. Professionalizing the management structure and implementing a succession plan would help the long term success and growth of the family business.
Finance is the source of many conflicts in relationships. If you can manage your family's finances then you are on your way to having a healthier relationship.
The document discusses family planning methods including natural family planning, barrier contraception, hormonal birth control, sterilization, and discusses the key points of the Reproductive Health Bill. The bill promotes both natural and modern family planning, and mandates the government fund widespread distribution of contraceptives. It requires reproductive health education in schools and guarantees reproductive healthcare access for all.
This document provides information about budgeting and different types of financial accounts. It discusses the importance of creating a budget and distinguishing between fixed and variable costs. It also describes several common types of bank accounts like checking accounts, savings accounts, certificates of deposit (CDs), and Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs). The document discusses using credit cards responsibly and ways to build wealth through strategies like savings accounts, government bonds, home ownership, and stock market investing.
The document presents a family budget plan for the Reyes family, who have a combined monthly income of 20,000 pesos. It allocates their income across key budget categories:
- Basic Needs (30% or 6,000 pesos)
- Allowance (24% or 4,800 pesos)
- Bills/Utilities (17% or 3,400 pesos)
- Savings (15% or 3,000 pesos)
- Education (7% or 1,400 pesos)
- Transportation (7% or 1,400 pesos)
The document provides a step-by-step breakdown of how the budget was calculated for each category based on the family
Family systems theory views the family as an emotional unit where family members are interconnected and interdependent. Key aspects of family systems theory include non-summativity, circular causality, and homeostasis. The theory is used to understand how families adapt to stressors and aims to maintain equilibrium. While family systems theory provides a lens for examining family dynamics, it has limitations such as not resulting in testable hypotheses and focusing too much on patterns over change.
The document provides information on various methods of family planning and birth control. It discusses fertility awareness methods, spermicides, male and female condoms, diaphragms, cervical caps, birth control sponges, pills, patches, vaginal rings, shots, implants, IUDs, tubal ligation, vasectomy, tubal implants, emergency contraception, options for older women, withdrawal, and the effectiveness of different methods. The most effective reversible methods are IUDs and hormonal implants, while abstinence is the only 100% effective method.
The document discusses various methods of family planning, including natural and artificial methods. Natural family planning relies on abstinence from sex during the most fertile times in a woman's cycle, which can be determined through basal body temperature tracking, cervical mucus monitoring, or calendar-based cycle tracking. Artificial methods prevent pregnancy through contraceptives like birth control pills, IUDs, condoms, diaphragms, spermicides, sterilization procedures (vasectomy for men or tubal ligation for women), or hormonal injections. Withdrawal is also mentioned as a method where the man removes his penis from the vagina before ejaculation.
The civil proceeding in Bangladesh in an adversarial system which means the whole process is a contest between two parties, namely, plaintiff and defendant. The court plays non partisan role. Civil proceedings is regulated by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The various stages of Civil proceeding may be discussed under the following heads:
a) Pre-trial stage
b) Trial stage
c) Post Trial stage
This document is an urgent whistleblower application filed in an Indian court. It seeks to bring important information on record related to the administration of justice in judicial institutions. It references several pending applications filed by the whistleblower dating back to 2011 that remain undecided. These applications contain evidence of criminal conspiracy and involvement of public servants and judicial officers that the whistleblower seeks to present. The document requests that if the whistleblower's locus standi (standing) is questioned, the pending probate case determining this issue must be decided first before the applications can be heard. It urges the court to decide the various pending applications in sequence to allow the whistleblower to present pre-charge evidence in the matter.
Presentation on CPC Case Managment by Mr. Murtaza Khan, CJ-III SwatAslam Parvaiz
1. The document outlines the case management rules introduced by the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan to expedite the disposal of civil cases.
2. It describes the first case management conference where the court and parties will schedule the filing of applications, replies, and hearings to streamline the proceedings. The conference aims to discover chances of settlement.
3. The court will then hold subsequent conferences and issue orders on applications within 60 days to ensure swift resolution of issues without opportunity for appeal on the orders. Conferences also focus the parties on the facts and legal issues in dispute for potential settlement.
1. The contempt petition alleges that there has been no progress in the investigation of an FIR registered 5 months after a hate speech incident on December 19, 2021, despite 8 months having passed.
2. The Additional Solicitor General submits there is no contempt of the Supreme Court's directions.
3. The court directs the Investigating Officer to submit an affidavit within 2 weeks detailing the steps taken in the investigation since the December 2021 incident.
4. The contempt petition will be heard again on January 30, 2023.
This document summarizes a Tax Court case regarding Walter and Carol Selph's challenge to tax liabilities and penalties for tax years 1999, 2000, and 2001. The Tax Court found that the Selphs were entitled to challenge their underlying tax liabilities for those years. Additionally, the court found that the Selphs were liable for failure-to-pay penalties for 1999 but not 2000 and 2001 due to Mrs. Selph's health issues those years which constituted reasonable cause for failure to timely file.
This document summarizes a Tax Court case regarding Walter and Carol Selph's challenge to tax liabilities and penalties for tax years 1999, 2000, and 2001. The Tax Court found that the Selphs were entitled to challenge their underlying tax liabilities for those years. Additionally, the court found that the Selphs were liable for failure-to-pay penalties for 1999 but not 2000 and 2001 due to Mrs. Selph's health issues those years which constituted reasonable cause for failure to timely file.
This document summarizes a Tax Court case regarding Walter and Carol Selph's challenge to tax liabilities and penalties for tax years 1999, 2000, and 2001. The Tax Court found that the Selphs were entitled to challenge their underlying tax liabilities for those years. Additionally, the court found that the Selphs were liable for failure-to-pay penalties for 1999 but not 2000 and 2001 due to Mrs. Selph's health issues those years which constituted reasonable cause for failure to timely file.
This document provides information about pending whistleblower applications in an ongoing judicial matter. It notes that the whistleblower/applicant has 10 pending applications in the case that have yet to be decided, dating back to 2011. These applications include requests for records, to add parties to the case, and to present evidence. The document calls for the applications to be decided in sequential order so that the whistleblower can properly present evidence in the matter involving alleged criminal conspiracy. It also discusses how a pending probate case could impact the whistleblower's ability to prosecute the case depending on the determination of his locus standi or legal standing.
This document contains Georgia statutes related to appellate procedures and certiorari. It includes sample forms for notices of appeal and cross appeal for both civil and criminal cases. It also provides the grounds for dismissal of an appeal, such as failure to file notice of appeal on time or if the questions presented have become moot. The statutes allow courts to order amendments to correct errors or omissions to perfect the appeal. They also state that failure to perfect service shall not affect the validity of certiorari proceedings, only be grounds for continuance.
RRT 2010 - Rule of Procedure for Small Claims CasesMABSIV
The document outlines the mandatory rules and procedures for small claims cases in Philippine courts, including determining jurisdiction, issuing summons, prohibiting certain pleadings, requiring settlement discussions at hearings, and rendering immediately executable decisions within 24 hours of hearings. Parties have no discretion and lawyers are generally not allowed, with the goal of expeditiously resolving small money claims.
3 Mode of Initiating a Civil Proceeding.pptxHazimRahim2
This document outlines the procedures for beginning civil proceedings in Malaysian courts. There are two modes of beginning a case:
1. Summons - Most civil proceedings are begun by summons. A summons must be in the proper form and accompanied by a statement of claim.
2. Application - Certain matters relating to personal and family law specified in the Second Schedule, such as marriage, guardianship, and divorce, must be begun by application. Applications must be made using the proper form, supported by an affidavit, and served on relevant parties.
The document provides details on requirements for summonses and applications, such as formatting, filing, service, and extensions. It also lists matters that must be begun by
The Supreme Court of India heard a case regarding a petitioner who was granted interim bail by the Supreme Court in 2020, but remained in custody due to failures in compliance and interpretation of the order by lower courts. While explanations were provided, the Supreme Court expressed concern over the "sorry state of affairs" and directed all High Courts to submit details of uncomplied bail orders and detained persons. The Supreme Court also issued general directions for corrective mechanisms, including maintaining registers of non-compliance and listing delayed bail matters. The petitioner was ultimately released after over 11 years of custody.
Collaborative divorce lawyer, family law in singaporeshanekabuttler
Divorce in Singapore is a two-stage process. In stage one, the court will decide whether to dissolve the marriage. If successful, an interim judgment is issued. In stage two, the court deals with ancillary matters like child custody, property division, and maintenance. It is a detailed process that involves filing documents, responding within deadlines, and potentially mediated settlements or trials. The final judgment is issued after all matters are resolved.
The Supreme Court of India heard a writ petition filed by Karuna Shankar against the State of Uttar Pradesh regarding her application for premature release that had been pending for over 3 years without justification. The Court directed the Director General of Prisons to ensure Shankar's application is considered and disposed of within a month and to file an affidavit of compliance. It warned of coercive action if further instances of authorities delaying such applications are found.
NaturaLyte and GranuFlo lawsuits in federal court have been consolidated into multidistrict litigation in federal court in Massachusetts. These lawsuits all claim money from the maker of GranuFlo and NaturaLyte, Fresenius Medical Care. NaturaLyte and GranuFlo were drugs used in the process of kidney dialysis. The FDA issued a Class I recall, its most serious, after it was discovered that NaturaLyte and GranuFlo could cause cardiac problems, including heart attacks and sudden death.
NaturaLyte and GranuFlo were recalled March 29, 2012. A copy of the FDA Recall Notice can be found among the documents uploaded by Michael J. Evans here on SlideShare.
Because the two dialysis drugs were presumably not used after March 29, 2013, there is some reason to believe that most, if not all, NaturaLyte and GranuFlo lawsuits could have been filed by March 30, 2012. Therefore, in states which have a two-year statute of limitations, there is an argument that the statute of limitations would run on a NaturaLyte or GranuFlo lawsuit no later than March 29, 2014. Of course, there are some states with longer statutes of limitation, and there are legal arguments, such as tolling, that may allow some people to file NaturaLyte and GranuFlo lawsuits after March 29, 2014.
It seems risky to this lawyer to wait to file a NaturaLyte or GranuFlo lawsuit. On July 29, 2013, the MDL judge entered this order setting a scheduling conference for August 30, 2013. One part of the Order that should be of particular interest to people with NaturaLyte or GranuFlo claims is this: the judge ordered all plaintiffs' attorneys to provide settlement proposals to the defendants' lawyers no later than two weeks prior to the hearing. That deadline ran on August 16, 2013. The lawyers for Fresenius Medical Care are ordered to respond to the proposals at the August 30 hearing.
If you were seriously injured by dialysis, or lost a family member due to dialysis, before the NaturaLyte and GranuFlo recall on March 29, 2013, you should have already had your possible lawsuit reviewed by a law firm which is experienced in representing injured people in pharmaceutical and medical device lawsuits. If you or your loved one experienced serious cardiac problems, including a heart attack or sudden death during or after dialysis while NaturaLyte and GranuFlo were still on the market, you may have a valuable claim for money but be unaware of it. You probably wouldn't be told by Fresenius that you or your family member were injured (or died) due to NaturaLyte or GranuFlo. You may wish to contact a law firm which is willing to spend the money to get copies of the medical records (at no cost to you) to see if NaturaLyte or GranuFlo were used. I am part of a group of law firms that handles such cases, and we would be glad to investigate your possible case of cardiac problems or death due to dialysis. If we don't collect money FOR you, we don't collect and money FROM you. It's a risk-free opportunity.
Virginia Rules of The Court. http://www.gloucestercounty-va.com Virginia rules of the court. Information you may need to know especially if you are going to handle your case pro se. Visit us.
SPIRIT OF CIVIL PROCEDURE REFORMS BITESCameron Ford
1. The court deprived both parties of costs for failing to comply with the spirit of civil procedure reforms requiring pre-commencement disclosure, mediation, and other cost-saving initiatives.
2. The defendant unreasonably rejected pre-commencement settlement offers from the plaintiffs, while the plaintiffs exaggerated their damages claim and imposed unreasonable conditions on mediation.
3. The court allocated costs against each party for different periods based on their compliance with the civil procedure reforms and reasonableness of their conduct, with the aim of reflecting the spirit of reducing costs.
5 manual for lawyers and parties rules 22 and 24 (1)Harve Abella
The document provides guidance for lawyers and parties on Rules 22 and 24 of the Revised Rules of Civil Procedure regarding preliminary conferences and trials. It outlines the procedures and requirements before, during, and after preliminary conferences and trials, including filing pleadings and motions, conducting discovery, submitting judicial affidavits and evidence, setting terms of reference, and examining witnesses. Lawyers are advised on proper procedures for objecting to questions, filing motions for postponement, and potential consequences for failure to appear.
Postdecree remedies for the aggrieved party .pdfElaDwynCordova
This document outlines several legal remedies available after a decree in land registration cases involving fraud in the Philippines:
1) An aggrieved person can pursue an action for damages against the applicant or person responsible for fraud if more than one year has passed since the certificate of title was issued and it can no longer be contested.
2) An action for reconveyance can be filed if the land has not been transferred to a third party, clear evidence of plaintiff's title exists, and fraud was committed by the registered owner.
3) Other cases not involving violations of trusts, like forged deeds of sale, require actions for reconveyance to be filed in a regular court rather than the land registration court.
This document is the record of proceedings from the Supreme Court of India regarding Writ Petition 274/2009 on Assam's National Register of Citizens (NRC) update. It includes:
1) The granting of an extension for publishing the final NRC to August 31, 2019 as requested by the State Coordinator.
2) Allowing the State Coordinator to combine certain rules for the NRC update.
3) Scheduling a hearing on August 7, 2019 to hear parties on two issues raised by the Coordinator regarding descendants of declared foreigners.
4) Not requiring further sample verification of the NRC update process beyond what has already been done, as reported by the State Coordinator.
Similar to Case management for family matters (20)
Reviewing contracts swiftly and efficiently is crucial for any organization. It ensures compliance, reduces risks, and keeps business operations running smoothly.
The presentation deals with the concept of Right to Default Bail laid down under Section 167 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 and Section 187 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023.
A Critical Study of ICC Prosecutor's Move on GAZA WarNilendra Kumar
ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan's proposal to its judges seeking permission to prosecute Israeli leaders and Hamas commanders for crimes against the law of war has serious ramifications and calls deep scrutiny.
Capital Punishment by Saif Javed (LLM)ppt.pptxOmGod1
This PowerPoint presentation, titled "Capital Punishment in India: Constitutionality and Rarest of Rare Principle," is a comprehensive exploration of the death penalty within the Indian criminal justice system. Authored by Saif Javed, an LL.M student specializing in Criminal Law and Criminology at Kazi Nazrul University, the presentation delves into the constitutional aspects and ethical debates surrounding capital punishment. It examines key legal provisions, significant case laws, and the specific categories of offenders excluded from the death penalty. The presentation also discusses recent recommendations by the Law Commission of India regarding the gradual abolishment of capital punishment, except for terrorism-related offenses. This detailed analysis aims to foster informed discussions on the future of the death penalty in India.
Indonesian Manpower Regulation on Severance Pay for Retiring Private Sector E...AHRP Law Firm
Law Number 13 of 2003 on Manpower has been partially revoked and amended several times, with the latest amendment made through Law Number 6 of 2023. Attention is drawn to a specific part of the Manpower Law concerning severance pay. This aspect is undoubtedly one of the most crucial parts regulated by the Manpower Law. It is essential for both employers and employees to abide by the law, fulfill their obligations, and retain their rights regarding this matter.
2. CONTENT
1) INTRODUCTION TO FAMILY COURT
2) THE RELATED STATUTES AND RULES
3) REGISTRATION OF CASES
4) PROCEDURES
5) DECREE NISI & PROCEEDINGS THEREAFTER
6) EXECUTION & ENFORCEMENT OF ORDERS
3. INTRODUCTION TO FAMILY COURT
CASES HEARD AND GOVERNED UNDER THE FAMILY COURT;
DIVORCE/DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE
JUDICIAL SEPARATION
NULLITY OF MARRIAGE
CHILD CUSTODY
MAINTAINENCE (FOR WIFE AND CHILDREN)
DISTRIBUTION OF MATRIMONIAL PROPERTY
FAMILY MATTERS FILED UNDER ORIGINATING SUMMONS (CODE 24)
* FOR NON-MUSLIM ONLY
4. STATUTES & RULES
1 – LAW REFORM (MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE) ACT 1976
2 – DIVORCE AND MATRIMONIAL PROCEEDINGS RULES 1980
3 – HIGH COURT RULES 2012
4 – LEGITIMACY ACT 1961
5 – COURT OF JUDICATURE ACT 1964
5. REGISTRATION OF CASE ACCORDING
TO CODES
A) CODE 33 – SINGLE PETITION UNDER SECTION 53, CONVERSION TO ISLAM UNDER
SECTION 51, JUDICIAL SEPARATION UNDER SECTION 64, NULLITY OF MARRIAGE
UNDER SECTION 68 AND 70 AND DECLARATION UNDER SECTION 107.
B) CODE 33JP – JOINT PETITION UNDER SECTION 52
C) CODE 24 – INVOLVES ANY CASE THAT FALLS UNDER SECTION 24 (a) AND (d)
OF THE COURT JUDICATURE ACT 1964, FOR FAMILY CASES FILED UNDER
ORIGINATING SUMMONS.
D) CODE 34 – LEGITIMACY OF A CHILD UNDER THE LEGITIMACY ACT 1961
6. PROCEDURES
A) SINGLE PETITION UNDER CODE 33 (UNCONTESTED)
B) SINGLE PETITION UNDER CODE 33 (CONTESTED)
C) SINGLE PETITION UNDER CODE 33 – PETITION NOT SERVED
D) JOINT PETITION UNDER CODE 33JP
E) APPLICATION MADE VIA NOTICE OF APPLICATION
7. WORK FLOW
(DIVORCE CASES – SINGLE PETITION CODE 33)
PETITION SERVED (UNCONTESTED)
(1 MONTH)
(2-3 WEEKS)
REGISTRATION
FIRST CASE MANAGEMENT
PAPERS IN ORDER
ORDER IN TERMS
PAPERS NOT IN ORDER
FIX ANOTHER 1-2 WEEKS HEARING DATE
HEARING DATE
8. REGISTRATION Automatic level 1 e-filing will fix 1st CM in one month time.
FIRST CASE MANAGEMENT Court ensures service of the petition is perfected under (Rule 12 (1) – (8) of Divorce &
Matrimonial Rules 1980)
Petition is not contested where :
a) Respondent comes to court, receives the petition and does not object to the terms.
b) Respondent does not come to court even after being informed about the case
management date.
Court ensures affidavit of service has been filed.
If papers are in order, Court straight away fixes hearing date. Petitioner to file Notis Bicara %
Arahan Perbicaraan.
SECOND CASE MANAGEMENT
(if paper is not in order)
In the event where affidavit of service has not been filed or petition is not successfully served,
Court fixes short date (1-2 weeks) pending hearing
HEARING DATE Papers in order, court to grant OIT.
Documents involved;
a) Petisyen Perceraian
b) Afidavit menyokong petisyen
c) Notis Perlantikan Peguamcara
d) Notis Prosiding
e) Pernyataan anak-anak (jika ada)
f) Afidavit Penyampaian
g) Notis Bicara
h) Arahan Perbicaraan
DETAILED EXPLANATION
9. WORK FLOW
(DIVORCE CASES – SINGLE PETITION CODE 33)
PETITION SERVED (CONTESTED)
(1 MONTH)
(2 – 3 WEEKS)
(1 MONTH)
(2 WEEKS)
(2 WEEKS)
REGISTRATION
FIRST CASE MANAGEMENT
SECOND CASE MANAGEMENT
THIRD CASE MANAGEMENT/FINAL CASE
MANAGEMENT
F
FINAL CASE MANAGEMENT
TRIAL
DECISION
FILE CLOSED
10. DETAILED EXPLANATION
REGISTRATION Automatic level 1 e-filing will fix 1st CM in one month time.
FIRST CASE MANAGEMENT Court ensures service of the petition is perfected under (Rule 12 (1) – (8) of Divorce &
Matrimonial Rules 1980)
Service perfected, Respondent will have to file notice of intention to defend – an
acknowledgment of service (Form 6) within 8 days after service of petition. (Rule 13 of
Divorce & Matrimonial Rules 1980)
Respondent/ Co-Respondent will have 21 days after the expiry of the 8 days period to file an
answer to the petition (Rule 16(1) of Divorce & Matrimonial Rules 1980)
Filing of an answer and reply to the answer each will be given 14 days to file (Rule 17 of
Divorce & Matrimonial Rules 1980)
SECOND CASE MANAGEMENT Court directs parties to close pleadings within 1 month.
In the event where the respondent has subsequent reply to the petitioners’ reply, he shall
apply leave from the court.
(Rule 17 of Divorce & Matrimonial Rules 1980)
If the respondent has no subsequent reply, Court fixes a date for mediation and final case
management before the Court.
(O34 Rule 2 (2)(a) of The Rules of Court 2012)
11. THIRD CASE MANAGEMENT/FINAL CASE MANAGEMENT If mediation succeed, Court fixes a date before Judge for parties to record consent judgment.
If mediation fails, Court directs parties to prepare 2 sets of BOP, CBOD and 1 set of SOAF,
SOITBT, PCS, DCS, W/List, W/Statements AND court will fix a trial date.
(O34 Rule 2(2) of The Rules of Court 2012)
Court directs the parties to hand over hard copy of bundles to the court 2 weeks before trial
or sooner.
TRIAL DATE Officers to make sure all documents for trial are complete and ready in court and also to
make sure all witnesses to take stand are present in court.
Proceed with trial.
Documents involved;
a) Bundle of Pleadings
b) Common Bundle of Document
c) Statement of Agreed Facts
d) Issues to be Tried
e) Summary of Case
f) List of Witness
g) Witness Statement
DECISION After petitioner and respondent are done with calling their witnesses and them giving
statement and evidence and parties have submit their case, case is closed for trial.
It depends on Yang Arif whether to give decision straight away or to fix another date for
decision.
12. WORK FLOW
(DIVORCE CASES – SINGLE PETITION CODE 33)
PETITION NOT SERVED
(1 MONTH)
(2 – 3 WEEKS)
(1 MONTH)
(2 WEEKS)
REGISTRATION
FIRST CASE MANAGEMENT
SECOND CASE MANAGEMENT/SUBSTITUTED
SERVICE HEARING
THIRD CASE MANAGEMENT
HEARING
PAPERS IN ORDER
ORDER IN TERMS
PAPERS NO IN ORDER
FIX ANOTHER 1-2 WEEKS HEARING DATE
FILE CLOSED
13. REGISTRATION Automatic level 1 e-filing will fix 1st CM in one month time.
FIRST CASE MANAGEMENT Court directs service of petition or application for substituted service (SS) to be made within 2 weeks. 2 – 3
weeks CM date will be given.
(*Rule 12 (9) Divorce & Matrimonial Proceedings Rules 1980 )
SECOND CASE MANAGEMENT/SS HEARING If SS application is filed, Court to grant OIT (papers in order).
Documents involved;
1) Notice of application
2) Affidavit of support
3) Affidavit of non-service
Petition will be struck off in the event of default of service/no SS application filed.
(*Order 34 Rule 3 High Court Rules 2012)
Service of SS application to be made within 1 month.
1 month CM date is given
THIRD CASE MANAGEMENT If the petition is served, to fix hearing date within 2 or 3 weeks. If the petition is not served, to strike off the
petition.
Court directs petitioner’s to file Notis Bicara & Arahan Perbicaraan.
DETAILED EXPLANATION
14. HEARING DATE Papers in order, court to grant OIT.
Documents involved;
a) Petisyen Perceraian
b) Afidavit menyokong petisyen
c) Notis Perlantikkan Peguamcara
d) Akuan Terima Penyampaian
e) Notis Prosiding
f) Pernyata anak-anak (jika ada)
g) Perintah Penyampaian Ganti/Pengecualian serahan (jika ada)
h) Afidavit Penyampaian
i) Notis Bicara
j) Arahan Perbicaraan
If papers not in order, new hearing date will be fix (within 1-2 weeks date)
15. WORK FLOW CHART
(DIVORE CASES – JOINT PETITION CODE 33JP)
REGISTRATION
HEARING DATE
PAPERS IN ORDER PAPERS NOT IN ORDER
FILE CLOSED
ORDER IN TERMS FIX ANOTHER HEARING DATE
16. REGISTRATION Automatic level one e-filing will fix 2 weeks hearing date before Judge
HEARING DATE Order is given if papers in order.
Documents involved;
- Petisyen Bersama
- Afidavit Isteri
- Afidavit Suami
- Pernyata Anak-anak
- Afidavit Pengecualian Kehadiran (If either parties can’t be present during hearing)
If papers not in order, Court will fix another hearing date (within 1 – 2 weeks date)
AFTER HEARING To update minutes (by interpreters)
File closed.
DETAILED EXPLANATION
17. WORK FLOW
DIVORCE CASES
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
SERVED NOT SERVED
EX PARTE INTER PARTE
REGISTRATION
(LEVEL 1 E-FILING)
1ST CM IN 2 WEEKS
1st CM
TO MAKE SURE PAPERS
IN ORDER
TO FIX HEARING DATE IN
2 WEEKS
HEARING
COURT TO GRANT OIT IF PAPERS
IN ORDER
FILE CLOSED
REGISTRATION
(LEVEL 1 E-FILING)
1ST CM IN 1 MONTH
1ST CM
1) COURT TO DIRECT PARTIES TO EXHAUST ALL
AFFIDAVITS IN ONE MONTH
-RESPONDENT’S TO REPLY WITHIN 14 DAYS
-APPLICANT TO REPLY WITHIN 14 DAYS
THEREAFTER
2) COURT TO FIX NEXT CM IN ONE MONTH
1ST CM
1) COURT TO DIRECT PARTIES TO FILE IN
SUBSTITUTED SERVICE APPLICATION
2) COURT TO FIX 2 WEEKS FOR HEARING
DATE
2ND CM
1) IF ALL AFFIDAVITS ARE EXHASUTED, COURT
TO FIX HEARING DATE IN 2 WEEKS
2) PARTIES TO FILE IN WRITTEN SUBMISSION 1
WEEKS BEFORE HEARING DATE
2ND CM/HEARING
OIT IF THE SS APPLICATION FILED AND
DIRECT SERVICE BY SS
STRIKE OUT IF NOT SERVED AND NO SS
FILED
FIX NEXT CM IN 1 MONTH
3RD CM
IF SERVICE IS COMLETED, COURT TO FIX
A HEARING DATE WITHIN 2 WEEKS
IF SERVICE IS NOT COMPLETED,
ANOTHER ONE WEEK CM DATE
18. HEARING
COURT TO GRANT OIT IF PAPERS IN ORDER
APPLICATION DISPOSED
HEARING
COURT TO GRANT OIT IF PAPERS IN ORDER
APPLICATION DISPOSED
19. 1 Substitutes Service (Ex-parte)
(Rules 12 (9) DMPR 1980)
Documents involved;
a) Notice of application
b) Affidavit in support
c) Affidavit of non-service
2 Dispensation of Service (Ex-parte)
(Rule 12 (10) DMPR 1980)
In situation where the Respondent is a foreigner and has gone back to their own
country and cannot be located.
Documents involved;
a) Notice of application
b) Affidavit in support (to exhibit report from the Immigration Department – in and
out (Malaysia) record of the Respondent, if any)
3 Leave Application (Ex-parte)
(Can also be ex-parte to Inter-parte)
Several types of leave application, such as;
1) Leave for committal (Order 52 HCR 2012)
Documents involved;
a) Notice of application
b) Affidavit in support
c) Statement under O52 R3(2)
1) Leave to file re-joinder (Rule 17 (3) DMPR 1980)
Documents involved;
a) Notice of Application
b) Affidavit in Support
Types of Application made via Notice of Application
20. 4 Variation of Decree Nisi
(section 83, 84, 96 and 97 of the LRA 1976)
Variation as to the Decree Nisi for the arrangement of custody and maintenance.
This application can be made ex-parte or inter-parte.
Documents involved;
a) Notice of Application
b) Affidavit in support
6 Ancillary Reliefs Application under Rule 56 (3) DMPR 1980, Notice of Application under Form 11.
21. 1 Declaration Under Rule 80 and 81 of the DMPR 1980 for marital status, declaration for
legitimacy of a child and validity of a marriage.
Application shall be made by petition.
1 Maintenance, custody and access Application made before initiate/ during divorce petition under code 33
2 Legitimacy of a child Can also be made under Originating Summons
3 Leave for exemption from the Marriage Tribunal Section 106 (1) LRA 1976
4 Leave to file a petition for divorce before 2 years Section 50 of the LRA 1976 and rule 7(1) DMPR 1980
Other application that related to Family/Divorce matter.
Application for Family matters that can be file under Originating summons (code 24)
22. DECREE NISI AND PROCEEDINGS
THEREAFTER
Section 61 of Law Reform Marriage and Divorce Act 1976
-General rule is that, every decree shall not be made absolute before the
expiration of three (3) months from its grant.
-However, the court may, upon the request of the parties and discretion of it,
fixes a shorter period for example 1 month/2 months and also on the
immediate effect for the decree to be made absolute.
-Rationale for 3 months period :- a period for reconciliation for the parties (if
possible)
-If, after the expiration of 3 months no application for the decree to be made
absolute by the party to whom it was granted, then the party against whom it
was granted may make an application to rescind the decree nisi or make the
decree absolute.
23. EXECUTION & ENFORCEMENT OF
ORDERS
A) COMMITAL PROCEEDINGS – RULE 74 DMPR 1980 / ORDER 52 HIGH COURT
RULES 2012
- PARTY INITIATING THE COMMITAL PROCEEDING MUST FIRST OBTAINED LEAVE
FROM THE COURT WITH THE FILING OF NOTICE OF MOTION FOR COMMITAL.
- ONCE THE COURT LEAVE IS OBTAINED, THEN THE APPLICANT CAN PROCEED
WITH THE COMMITAL PROCEEDINGS.
- DOCUMENTS INVOLVED ;
NOTIS USUSL
AFIDAVIT SOKONGAN
PENYATAAN MENURUT ATURAN 52 HIGH COURT RULES 2012
- SERVICE OF NOTICE OF COMMITAL PROCEEDINGS SHALL BE SERVE PRSONALLY TO
24. EXECUTION & ENFORCEMENT OF
ORDERS
B) JUDGMENT DEBTOR SUMMONS – RULE 73 DMPR 1980 AND ORDER 48 OF THE RULES OF COURT
2012
- AN APPLICATION FILED UNDER FORM 17 AND SHALL BE SERVED PERSONALLY TO THE
DEBTOR/RESPONDENT.
-ORDER 48 IN FORM 95 (HCR 2012)
-COURT MAY ORDER THE JUDGMENT DEBTOR TO ATTEND BEFORE REGISTRAR AND BE
ORALLY EXAMINED ON MEANS OF SATISFYING THE JUDGEMENT OR ORDER
-JDS IS ANOTHER OPTION TO GO IN THE EVENT THE PERSON AGAINST WHOM THE ORDER
WAS MADE FAILS TO ABIDE BY THE ORDER WHICH HAS BEEN GRANTED PREVIOUSLY BY THE
COURT
-REGISTRAR SHALL TAKE DOWN STATEMENT MADE BY THE JUDGMENT DEBTOR AND ASK HIM
TO SIGN AFTER READING IT TO HIM