This document discusses the traditional Fulbe classifications of women in terms of suitability for marriage. It notes that traditionally, the Fulbe recognized 10 categories of women, of which only one was considered preferable for marriage. The classifications were based on metaphorical descriptions that often stigmatized women.
The paper then analyzes each of the nine non-preferred categories in turn, providing the traditional Fulbe perspective and then offering modern rebuttals and remedies. It argues that many of the traditional views were based on outdated assumptions about topics like distance, family ties, wealth, fertility and slavery that have been challenged by modern technology, medicine, social changes and legal protections.
Overall, the document aims to bridge the gap between