A validation of the adverse childhood experiences scale in

Research on Humanities and Social Sciences www.iiste.org
ISSN (Paper)2224-5766 ISSN (Online)2225-0484 (Online)
Vol.5, No.11, 2015
18
A Validation of the Adverse Childhood Experiences Scale in
Nigeria
Olalekan Taoreed Kazeem
Department of Psychology, University of Ibadan
Abstract
Adverse Childhood Experience International Questionnaire (ACE-IQ) was developed to measure childhood
trauma in adolescents and adults. The present study examined concurrent validity of ACE-IQ and Childhood
Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) using responses of 253 prison inmates on both instruments. The instruments were
administered concurrently to purposively selected inmates in Agodi Prison, Ibadan. Correlations between the
total score of the ACE-IQ and the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) were significant. Correlations
between each subscale of the ACE-IQ and the CTQ were significant. A 2x2x2x2 factorial analysis of gender, age,
educational level and marital status on adverse childhood experiences revealed that male, young, low on
education and divorced (MYLD) prison inmate were more on adverse childhood experience (n=4, x =108,
SD=6.9).These results indicated that the ACE-IQ and CTQ have concurrent validity and ACE IQ is a reliable
and valid index of the adverse childhood experience in the study population.
Keywords: Adverse childhood experience questionnaire, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, prison inmates,
concurrent validity.
1. Background
In the last few years, the activities of the United Nations (UN) and other global organization especially world
health organization have been focused on how to improve health among citizen of the world. To this end, efforts
are directed towards health care system, raising standard of living and globalization to bring about synergy
among nations in order to enhance better health care. These efforts of the UN reflect prominently in the
Millennium Development goal document (United Nations Millennium Development Goal, 2006).
Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) refer to some of the most intensive and frequently occurring
sources of stress that children may suffer early in life. Such experiences include multiple types of abuse; neglect;
violence between parents or caregivers; other kinds of serious household dysfunction such as alcohol and
substance abuse; and peer, community and collective violence. It poses the question of whether, and how,
childhood experiences affect adult health decades later. The findings from the ACE Study provide a remarkable
insight into how we become what we are as individuals and as a nation. They are important medically, socially,
and economically. ACEs are surprisingly common, happen even in “the best of families” and have long-term,
damaging consequences.
The ACE Study reveals a powerful relationship between emotional experiences as children and
physical and mental health as adults, as well as the major causes of adult mortality and criminality. It documents
the conversion of traumatic emotional experiences in childhood into organic disease later in life. How does this
happen, this reverse alchemy, turning the gold of a new-born infant into the lead of a depressed, diseased adult?
The Study makes it clear that time does not heal some of the adverse experiences.
The Adverse Childhood Experiences Study started in the mid-1980s in an obesity program that had a
high dropout rate. The first of many unexpected discoveries was that the majority of the dropouts actually were
successfully losing weight. Accidentally it was learned from detailed life interviews of 286 such individuals that
childhood sexual abuse was remarkably common and, if present, always antedated the onset of their obesity. No
one previously had sought this kind of medical information from them but many patients spoke of their
conscious awareness of an association between abuse and obesity.
Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have been consistently linked to psychiatric difficulties in
children and adults. Children living in families with alcohol- abusing parents and psychopathology are more
likely than other children to have an unpredictable home life and to carry a burden of secrecy as a result of their
attempts to hide the alcohol abuse from others. These children also have an increased risk of a variety of other
adverse childhood experiences, including being abused or neglected, witnessing domestic violence, and being
exposed to drug-abusing, mentally ill, suicidal, or criminal household members. The risk of alcoholism,
psychopathology, and other medical and social problems has been reported to be greater among adult children of
alcoholics than among other adults.
Adverse childhood experiences have not been documented in developing countries. This results from
lack of clear understanding of adverse childhood experiences and instruments that measure constructs related to
the definition. The Adverse Childhood Experience International Questionnaire (WHO, 2009), and Childhood
Traumatic Questionnaire (Bernstein and Fink, 1998) were based on the scientific model of adverse childhood
experience. In order to effectively use the adverse childhood experience in research or for a wide range of

Vol.5, No.11, 2015
19
practical applications, it is necessary to have an instrument that will accurately and efficiently assess the
construct. The purpose of this study was to validate the adverse childhood experience international questionnaire
with Childhood Traumatic Questionnaire. Concurrent validity requires that the criterion test (CTQ) must have
been validated, which has been done (Gerdner and Allgulander, 2009) and that the instruments measure the same
construct, which in this case is adverse childhood experience.
2. Method
The study adopted a cross sectional design was conducted in Agodi prison in Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. The
prison was located in Ibadan North Local Government area and the largest in the State. It was built in 1894 has a
total of 921 inmates out of which 794 were awaiting trial.
Prospective participants were required to fill an inclusion-exclusion criteria including;
(1) Being inmate of the prison irrespective of the duration of sentence or awaiting trial,
(2) English literate and
(3) Personally willing to participate after an informed consent process. Even though over 921 inmates were
fully registered at the Prison, only about 300 of them fulfilled the inclusion criteria, and were
purposively included as participants.
Of these, 253 questionnaires were correctly filled and returned, representing 84.3 % response rate. They made up
of 220 (87%) males and 33 (13%) females. The participants’ age ranged between 20 and 53 years with a mean
age of 30years. 181(72%) were Yoruba, 26(10.2%) were Hausa and 30(12%) were Igbo and 16(6%) belong to
other ethnic group. Educational qualification indicated that 35(14%) had no formal education, 12(5%) had less
than primary school, 38(15%) completed primary school, 127(50%) completed secondary school, 39(15.4%)
completed college or university education and 2(1%) had postgraduate degree. 102(40.3%) of the participants
were married,42(17%) were living as a couple,7(3%) were divorced/separated,100(40%) were single and 2(1%)
were widowed.
3. Instruments
Adverse childhood experience international questionnaire, ACE-IQ was designed to measure adverse childhood
experience. It is a 43- item scale. The scale was developed by according to model of adverse childhood
experience by World Health Organization (2009). The questionnaire has seven sections; Section A (0) had
demographic information such as sex, age, education level, civic/marital status and work status in the last 12
months. Section B (1) was 5-item eliciting information on marriage, which had yes or no response format.
Section C (2) had 5 items generating information on relationship with Parents/Guardians with 5 likert response
format for first two items ranging from never (1) to always (5) while the last three items had 4 graduating
response format ranging from never(1) to many times(4).Section D consisted of 16- item eliciting information on
family environment with yes or no response format for the first five items and 4 likert format ranging from
never(1) to many times(4) for eleven. Section E(6) comprised of 3-item on peer violence with 4 graduating
response format for item 1 and 3 and second item on 7 likert response format. Section F (7) measured witnessing
community violence with 3-item and 4 likert response format ranging from never (1) to many times (4). Section
G(8) had 4 items eliciting information on exposure to war/collective violence with 4 graduating response style
from never (1) to many times (4).
The Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ) was developed from a 70-item retrospective questionnaire
for which participants were required to rate the frequency (0- never true to 5-very often true) of abuse and
neglect events that took place when they “were growing up”. It was developed by Bernstein and Fink (1998). In
further studies, the length of the scale was reduced to 28 items based on exploratory and confirmatory factor
analyses. The short version of the CTQ assesses emotional abuse, physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional
neglect, and physical neglect. Emotional abuse refers to verbal assaults on a child's sense of worth or well-being,
or any humiliating, demeaning, or threatening behaviour directed toward a child by an older person. Physical
abuse refers to bodily assaults on a child by an older person that pose a risk of, or result in, injury. Sexual abuse
refers to sexual contact or conduct between a child and an older person, including explicit coercion. Emotional
neglect refers to the failure of caretakers to provide basic psychological and emotional needs, such as love,
encouragement, belonging and support. Physical neglect refers to failure to provide basic physical needs
including food, shelter, and safety. Each scale is presented in a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 5 to 25.
The final scores are classified according to manual's cut-off scores for the severity of abuse and neglect: “none to
minimal,” “low to moderate,” “moderate to severe,”and “severe to extreme”. Three additional items compose the
Minimization/Denial subscale for detecting socially desirable responses or false-negative trauma reports. The
total CTQ score takes into account the severity of multiple forms of abuse and neglect. The internal consistency
coefficients ranged from 0.61 (physical neglect) to 0.95 (sexual abuse).

Vol.5, No.11, 2015
20
4. Data collection
The researcher obtained permission from Prison Authority to conduct the study. He contacted the Prison
Psychologist and welfare officers. Besides this, I participated directly in group counselling session for the
inmates to talk about problems they encountered in their everyday lives. At that time, I was given opportunity to
have direct contact with the inmates. Building rapport was part of the whole process of collecting data. I
conducted prisons visits. During rapport building, I participated in daily life with them and asked questions
starting from their everyday life and background. The researcher explained purpose of the study to the
prospective participants and made them realized their right to withdrawal from the study, any time during the
study. After a few meetings, I could start asking questions about their childhood experiences However, once they
trusted me; they told me without asking them about their adverse childhood experience. Some cases cried and
expressed resentment about their past lifestyle. I then purposively administered questionnaire to those meet the
inclusion and exclusion criteria. They were allowed to read the informed consent process and attest their
signature for willingness to participate. There was no time restriction.A total of 300 of them fulfilled the
inclusion criteria, and were purposively included as participants. Of these, only 253 questionnaires were
correctly and completely filled. Completed questionnaires were sorted, coded, and entered into the Statistical
Package for Social Sciences for data analysis.
5. Results
Alpha coefficient of score on marriage, relationship with Parents/Guardians, Family environment, peer violence,
witnessing community violence and exposure to war/collective violence were found to be 0.65, 0.71, 0.72, 0.69,
0.81 and 0.79 respectively.Internal consistency for the 38 items excluding demographic variables yielded
0.80.Cronbach’s α coefficients for the scores on all 38 items of the ACE IQ and the scores on all the 31 items of
the CTQ were .80 and .91, respectively.
A Pearson product moment correlation was calculated between the scores on the total scale of the ACE
IQ and the scores on the CTQ for the 253 participants who had both scores. A positive correlation, r= +0.72
(r2
= .52) was found between the scores on the ACE IQ and the scores on the CTQ. This relationship was
significant at the .01 level. The correlation coefficient, when interpreted as an index of the magnitude of the
effect, indicates a large effect size.
Pearson product moment correlations were also calculated between the scores on each one of the
subscales of the ACE IQ and the scores on the CTQ.A positive correlation of sexual abuse r=0.65(r2
=.43) and
physical neglect r=0.52(r2
=.27) of CTQ on family environment of ACE IQ was found. This relationship was
found to be significant at the .01 level of significance and with large effect size. A positive correlation r= +0.49
(r2
= .24) was found between the scores on the Peer violence of ACE IQ and physical abuse of CTQ. This
relationship was found to be significant at the .01 level of significance and with large effect size. A positive
correlation of community violence(r=0.56 (r2
= .31) and exposure to war/collection violence(r=0.62(r2
=.38) of
ACE IQ on emotional abuse of CTQ was observed. This relationship was found to be significant at the .01 level
with a large effect size. Relationship with parents/Guardians of ACE IQ had positive correlation with emotional
neglect of CTQ(r=.23(r2
=.05). This relationship was found to be significant at the .05 level with a small effect
size.Mean and standard deviation by gender and total of subscale of ACE IQ and CTQ was analysed (see table 2
and 3).
A 2x2x2x2 factorial analysis of gender, age, educational level and marital status on adverse childhood
experiences revealed that male, young, low on education and divorced (MYLD) prison inmates had the highest
mean on adverse childhood experience (n=4, x =108, SD=6.9). The was seconded by male, old with high
educational status but living as a couple (cohabitation) (n=5, x =90.4, SD=8.7).Female respondents that are
young, low on education and married ranked third on adverse childhood experience (n=9, x =87.3, SD=2.1)
while old female with high educational qualification and living as a couple ranked fourth.
The group with fifth rank on adverse childhood experience are old males with high educational
qualification and married (n=20, x =82.6, SD=18.8).Young males with low educational qualification and living
as a couple was ranked sixth on adverse childhood experience (n=6, x =80.5, SD=25.5) while old males with low
educational qualification and married took the seventh position (n=51, x =78.7, SD=18.9). Young males with
low education and married got the eighth position on adverse childhood experience (n=26, x =76.5, SD=14.6).
Old male with low education and living as a couple had the ninth position (n=20, x =75.5, SD=18.2). However,
the group with the least likelihood to experience adverse childhood experience was young female with high
education and living as a couple (n=3, x =53)(table 4).
6. Discussion
The present study examined validity of adverse childhood experience international questionnaire with Nigeria
population. The total score and the subscales of the ACE IQ correlate with the CTQ, indicating that the ACE IQ
can be used to assess adverse childhood experience. One of the major findings was the factorial combination

Vol.5, No.11, 2015
21
which revealed that that male, young, low on education and divorced (MYLD) prison inmate were most likely
to experience adverse childhood experience. An advantage of the ACE IQ is the ability to focus on the
components of the childhood trauma construct. However, it is evident that further research needs to be done with
the ACE IQ and in the general field of adverse childhood experience research.
There are difference in ACE IQ and CTQ, but they measure the same construct. ACE IQ has six
subscales excluding demographic variable while CTQ has five subscales. CTQ is a 28-item retrospective self-
report questionnaire with strong psychometric properties for clinical and non-clinical samples that has been used
in many different countries but ACE IQ is recently gaining attention in few countries. However, this analysis
also confirms that all the key ACE IQ scale items remain very important and make discrete independent
contributions, even when many other factors are considered. Mean obtained by gender on ACE IQ revealed
norm for interpretation of scores on the scale.
The study data were obtained from samples of prison inmates in Nigeria, using an analytical technique
that was appropriate and robust for this sample. Although it is difficult to generalize and to apply the findings to
other population, there are nevertheless some implications both for the use of the scale cross-culturally and
inform policies and programmes designed to reduce ACEs and promote safe, stable and nurturing relationships
between children and their parent or caregivers in Nigeria and other African countries.
This method of assessing adverse childhood experience may be considered to be adequate. Although the
data are based entirely on self- reporting, the method is suitable for obtaining estimates of childhood trauma
experiences in relation to anti-social behaviour and criminality. Furthermore, the method may be used to identify
psychosocial factors in health risk behaviour. The scale has also been judged to be useful for assessing the
predisposition of individuals to criminality in future.
By and large, these results show that the ACE IQ is a reliable and valid index of the adverse childhood
experience in the study population. Individuals who respond to the questions on the scale are given points on
each of the scale items and on the six dimensional factor structure. In addition, the scale appears appropriate for
general descriptive purposes, and our findings shows that quantitative measurement of some aspects of adverse
childhood experience is possible with relatively simple methods. It is desirable to expand the scope of the results
of this study to cover a wider population. Further evaluations of the scale need to be conducted on other
population groups in the country, with the aim of improving and refining the method. This should provide
additional information, especially on the scale’s reliability and validity.
Table 1
Correlation of subscale of ACE IQ and CTQ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Marriage ---
Relationship with parent/guardian .15* ---
Family environment .21* .35* ---
Peer violence .34* 42* .51* ---
Community violence .10 .11* .45* .62*---
Exposure to war/collective violence-.27* .14 .16 .57*.73*---
Emotional abuse .42* .32* .13 .20 .56* .62*---
Physical abuse .13* .22* .31* .49* .36* .35*.42* ---
Sexual abuse .32* .38* .65* .34* .40* .24* .65* .17* ---
Emotional neglect .51* .23** .24* .46* .21* -.29*.75* .27* .67* ---
Physical neglect .32* .26* .52* .42* .10 .17 .60* .34* .53* .35* ---
*P<.01

Vol.5, No.11, 2015
22
Table 2
Mean and standard deviation by gender and total (ACE IQ)
N MEAN SD
Marriage
Male 220 2.6 1.3
Female 33 1.8 0.6
Total 253 3.8 1.4
Relationship with parents/guardian
Male 220 15.7 5.7
Female 33 11.2 3.7
Total 253 14.8 4.6
Family environment
Male 220 25.5 7.8
Female 33 14.6 6.5
Total 253 22.6 8.1
Peer violence
Male 220 5.9 3.6
Female 33 3.8 2.2
Total 253 5.2 3.1
Community violence
Male 220 3.1 1.8
Female 33 2.9 1.4
Total 253 3.4 2.0
Exposure to war/collective violence
Male 220 3.6 2.1
Female 33 3.1 2.0
Total 253 3.7 2.2
ACE IQ
Male 220 45.8 17.5
Female 33 36.9 16.4
Total 253 46.3 23.5
Table 3
Mean and standard deviation by gender and total (CTQ)
N MEAN SD
Emotional abuse
Male 220 3.6 1.5
Female 33 2.8 0.9
Total 253 4.8 1.3
Physical abuse
Male 220 4.9 1.5
Female 33 1.6 0.9
Total 253 3.8 1.6
Sexual abuse
Male 220 3.5 0.8
Female 33 2.6 0.7
Total 253 3.6 1.1
Emotional neglect
Male 220 2.9 0.9
Female 33 1.8 0.7
Total 253 5.2 2.1
Physical neglect
Male 220 3.1 1.8
Female 33 2.9 1.4
Total 253 3.4 1.5
CTQ
Male 220 3.8 1.5
Female 33 2.9 1.4
Total 253 4.3 2.5

Vol.5, No.11, 2015
23
Table 4
Summary Of 2x2x2x2 Factorial Levels Of Sex, Age, Education And Marital Status On Adverse
Childhood Experience Among Prison Inmates
Sex Age Educational
status
Marital status Interaction Adverse Childhood
Experience
Ranking
On
X
N X SD
Male Young Low Married MYLM 22 76.1 14.5 8th
Cohabitation MYLC 6 80.5 25.5 6th
Divorced/separated MYLD 4 108 6.9 1st
Single MYLS 61 68 20 12th
Widowed MYLW 2 73 10th
High Cohabitation MYHC 2 54 18th
Single MYHS 5 62.6 13.1 14th
Old Low Married MOLM 51 78.7 18.9 7th
Cohabitation MOLC 20 75.5 18.2 9th
Single MOLS 19 70.2 23.1 11th
High Married MOHM 20 82.6 18.8 5th
Cohabitation MOHC 5 90.4 8.7 2nd
Divorced/separated MOHD 3 63 13th
Female Young Low Married FYLM 9 87.3 2.1 3rd
Cohabitation FYLC 3 61 15th
Single FYLS 12 54.2 5.6 17th
High Cohabitation FYHC 3 53 19th
Old Low Single FOLS 3 59 16th
High Cohabitation FOHC 3 87 4th
Total 253
Keys: M= male, F=female, Y=young, O=old, L=low, H=high, M=married, C=cohabitation, S=single,
D=divorced/separated, W= widowed.
References
1.Bernstein DP and Fink L (1998).Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. A retrospective self-report. Manual. San
Antonio, TX: The Psycho- logical Corporation, Harcourt Brace & Company.
2.Gerdner A, and Allgulander C (2009) Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the Childhood
Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF). Nord J Psychiatry 63: 160–170. doi:
10.1080/08039480802514366
3.United Nations Millennium Development Goals (2006).The Millennium Development Goals Report
2006.http//mdgs.un.org/unsd/mdg/Resources/Static/Products/progress2006/
4. WorldHealthOrganization(2009).www.who.int/violence_injury.../adverse_childhood_experiences/en

Business, Economics, Finance and Management Journals PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
European Journal of Business and Management EJBM@iiste.org
Research Journal of Finance and Accounting RJFA@iiste.org
Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development JESD@iiste.org
Information and Knowledge Management IKM@iiste.org
Journal of Developing Country Studies DCS@iiste.org
Industrial Engineering Letters IEL@iiste.org
Physical Sciences, Mathematics and Chemistry Journals PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Journal of Natural Sciences Research JNSR@iiste.org
Journal of Chemistry and Materials Research CMR@iiste.org
Journal of Mathematical Theory and Modeling MTM@iiste.org
Advances in Physics Theories and Applications APTA@iiste.org
Chemical and Process Engineering Research CPER@iiste.org
Engineering, Technology and Systems Journals PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Computer Engineering and Intelligent Systems CEIS@iiste.org
Innovative Systems Design and Engineering ISDE@iiste.org
Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy JETP@iiste.org
Information and Knowledge Management IKM@iiste.org
Journal of Control Theory and Informatics CTI@iiste.org
Journal of Information Engineering and Applications JIEA@iiste.org
Industrial Engineering Letters IEL@iiste.org
Journal of Network and Complex Systems NCS@iiste.org
Environment, Civil, Materials Sciences Journals PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Journal of Environment and Earth Science JEES@iiste.org
Journal of Civil and Environmental Research CER@iiste.org
Life Science, Food and Medical Sciences PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Advances in Life Science and Technology ALST@iiste.org
Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare JBAH@iiste.org
Journal of Food Science and Quality Management FSQM@iiste.org
Journal of Chemistry and Materials Research CMR@iiste.org
Education, and other Social Sciences PAPER SUBMISSION EMAIL
Journal of Education and Practice JEP@iiste.org
Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization JLPG@iiste.org
Journal of New Media and Mass Communication NMMC@iiste.org
Journal of Energy Technologies and Policy JETP@iiste.org
Historical Research Letter HRL@iiste.org
Public Policy and Administration Research PPAR@iiste.org
International Affairs and Global Strategy IAGS@iiste.org
Research on Humanities and Social Sciences RHSS@iiste.org
Journal of Developing Country Studies DCS@iiste.org
Journal of Arts and Design Studies ADS@iiste.org

The IISTE is a pioneer in the Open-Access hosting service and academic event management.
The aim of the firm is Accelerating Global Knowledge Sharing.
More information about the firm can be found on the homepage:
http://www.iiste.org
CALL FOR JOURNAL PAPERS
There are more than 30 peer-reviewed academic journals hosted under the hosting platform.
Prospective authors of journals can find the submission instruction on the following
page: http://www.iiste.org/journals/ All the journals articles are available online to the
readers all over the world without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those
inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. Paper version of the journals is also
available upon request of readers and authors.
MORE RESOURCES
Book publication information: http://www.iiste.org/book/
IISTE Knowledge Sharing Partners
EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP Open
Archives Harvester, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek
EZB, Open J-Gate, OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial Library , NewJour, Google Scholar

A validation of the adverse childhood experiences scale in

More Related Content

What's hot

Viewers also liked

Similar to A validation of the adverse childhood experiences scale in

More from Alexander Decker

Recently uploaded

A validation of the adverse childhood experiences scale in