This document outlines the terms of an agreement between Western Carolina University and an independent contractor. It specifies:
1) The independent contractor's identifying information such as name, business address, tax ID number.
2) A description of the tasks to be performed by the contractor.
3) Details of payment including budget codes, total price, and payment schedule.
4) The agreement period and provisions for termination.
5) Clarification that the contractor is an independent entity, not a university employee.
In the Matter of the Arbitration Between: Walter A. Moede, Jr., Claimant v. Web Street Securities, Inc., Johnny Fiscus, and Edward McCarthy, Respondents
FindLaw | AIG Bonus Details Letter from NY AGLegalDocs
The Attorney General wrote to the House Committee on Financial Services to provide information about his investigation into executive compensation at AIG. He expressed dismay that AIG distributed over $160 million in retention bonuses to its Financial Products unit after receiving taxpayer funds. While AIG claims it had no choice, the AG argues AIG had leverage as employees agreed to $1 salaries in exchange for bonuses. The AG is seeking the names of bonus recipients to determine if AIG's claims that they were crucial to unwinding the unit are valid, as some recipients are no longer employed there. His office subpoenaed AIG for the names and will enforce compliance, as American taxpayers deserve to know where money is going.
This motion seeks to disqualify the law firm Wilson & Varner and attorney Rodney Varner from representing David Nance in litigation against the debtors Introgen Therapeutics, Inc. and Introgen Technical Services, Inc. Varner previously served as general counsel for the debtors from 1993 to 2009. The debtors have filed an adversary proceeding against Nance alleging fraudulent transfers and other claims. Wilson & Varner is now representing Nance in that proceeding and in related bankruptcy matters. The motion argues that Varner's prior representation of the debtors is substantially related to the current matters, and there is a risk that confidential information may be disclosed, in violation of ethical rules regarding conflicts of interest with former clients. The
This document is a consulting agreement between Accelerated Sciences Corp. and Medior Entertainment Group. Accelerated Sciences owes Medior $140,000 for prior services and retains Medior as a non-exclusive advisor for 4 months. The agreement outlines how the $140,000 will be paid based on financing amounts Accelerated Sciences receives, with full payment due by June 30, 2002 if certain financing thresholds are not met. It also covers expense reimbursement, termination terms, and confidentiality.
Claimant alleged as follows: Negligence; breach of fiduciary duty, unsuitable investments, and consumer fraud. Claimant's causes of action are in connection with technology related common stock.
This document outlines the terms of an agreement between Western Carolina University and an independent contractor. It specifies:
1) The independent contractor's identifying information such as name, business address, tax ID number.
2) A description of the tasks to be performed by the contractor.
3) Details of payment including budget codes, total price, and payment schedule.
4) The agreement period and provisions for termination.
5) Clarification that the contractor is an independent entity, not a university employee.
In the Matter of the Arbitration Between: Walter A. Moede, Jr., Claimant v. Web Street Securities, Inc., Johnny Fiscus, and Edward McCarthy, Respondents
FindLaw | AIG Bonus Details Letter from NY AGLegalDocs
The Attorney General wrote to the House Committee on Financial Services to provide information about his investigation into executive compensation at AIG. He expressed dismay that AIG distributed over $160 million in retention bonuses to its Financial Products unit after receiving taxpayer funds. While AIG claims it had no choice, the AG argues AIG had leverage as employees agreed to $1 salaries in exchange for bonuses. The AG is seeking the names of bonus recipients to determine if AIG's claims that they were crucial to unwinding the unit are valid, as some recipients are no longer employed there. His office subpoenaed AIG for the names and will enforce compliance, as American taxpayers deserve to know where money is going.
This motion seeks to disqualify the law firm Wilson & Varner and attorney Rodney Varner from representing David Nance in litigation against the debtors Introgen Therapeutics, Inc. and Introgen Technical Services, Inc. Varner previously served as general counsel for the debtors from 1993 to 2009. The debtors have filed an adversary proceeding against Nance alleging fraudulent transfers and other claims. Wilson & Varner is now representing Nance in that proceeding and in related bankruptcy matters. The motion argues that Varner's prior representation of the debtors is substantially related to the current matters, and there is a risk that confidential information may be disclosed, in violation of ethical rules regarding conflicts of interest with former clients. The
This document is a consulting agreement between Accelerated Sciences Corp. and Medior Entertainment Group. Accelerated Sciences owes Medior $140,000 for prior services and retains Medior as a non-exclusive advisor for 4 months. The agreement outlines how the $140,000 will be paid based on financing amounts Accelerated Sciences receives, with full payment due by June 30, 2002 if certain financing thresholds are not met. It also covers expense reimbursement, termination terms, and confidentiality.
Claimant alleged as follows: Negligence; breach of fiduciary duty, unsuitable investments, and consumer fraud. Claimant's causes of action are in connection with technology related common stock.
Landsman represents Alex Brown of the Saints - Investment News 2010.10.28 inv...blocklandsman
An NFL player sued his former financial advisers for $3.9 million, alleging they invested his money poorly in illiquid assets like airplane hangars and life insurance products without his knowledge. The player claims he trusted the advisers, who were long-time friends, and they took advantage of that trust for their own enrichment. The advisers deny the allegations and say the player was aware of all investment decisions.
Laurence Landsman interview 2001.02.28 usa today (viaticals)blocklandsman
An elderly couple invested a significant portion of their net worth in a viatical life insurance deal through an agent they trusted. However, their money was turned over to an escrow agent that was later accused of misappropriating millions of dollars from investors. While the agent who sold them the investment lost money as well and felt badly about their situation, over half of the couple's original investment was unable to be accounted for due to the collapse of the companies involved. Viatical investments carry high risks and seniors were warned to thoroughly research companies before investing.
Block and Landsman Award - Neuberger Bermanblocklandsman
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive function. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms.
This newsletter article summarizes two main topics:
1) It discusses a new option for investors to resolve disputes with registered investment advisors (RIAs) through voluntary FINRA arbitration rather than litigation. Arbitration is typically less expensive but provides limited discovery compared to court. Lawyers must consider these factors when deciding the best forum.
2) It provides tips for firms on conducting a compliance project during the typically quieter summer market period. Suggestions include evaluating the firm's compliance program, prioritizing projects that increase efficiencies, and selecting one or two meaningful projects to focus on rather than avoiding all projects.
Block & Landsman: Judgments and settlementsblocklandsman
The document describes several legal judgments and settlements involving investment fraud at various financial firms. They include a $5 million award against Lehman Brothers for principal protected note fraud, a $1.15 million settlement for an adviser who misappropriated an elderly client's funds, and a $700,000 settlement for an adviser who engaged in a pattern of selling unsuitable investments.
Block and Landsman Award - Kappel, breach of contractblocklandsman
The panel denied all claims by Advanced Equities, Inc. against Denise Kappel and awarded Kappel $260,328 in compensatory damages, $200,000 in compensatory and punitive damages under Title VII, and $80,000 in attorney's fees. The panel assessed Advanced Equities $27,040 in total fees, with a balance due of $19,825. Kappel was due a $775 refund.
This document outlines a contingency fee agreement between a client and a law office for legal representation related to a property damage claim. The attorney will receive either 33.3% or 40% of any recovery depending on whether a lawsuit is filed. The client is responsible for costs and expenses, but owes nothing if there is no recovery. Any disputes will be subject to binding arbitration. The agreement specifies the roles and responsibilities of both parties.
FLSA Litigation - Federal Court - MDFL Tampa - Fee Entitlement & MootnessPollard PLLC
Lawyers in FLSA cases and particularly on the defense side should view this as a cautionary tale: Tendering a check for the wages at issue does not moot the plaintiff's claim. FLSA claims are live until there is a judgment or a settlement approved by the court. And plaintiffs DO get their fees for litigating over the issue of attorneys' fees.
Simply put: A legitimate FLSA case, a skilled attorney on the plaintiff side, and defense counsel who do not understand the applicable legal framework make for disastrous results.
The debtor, Cordillera Golf Club, LLC, filed an application seeking approval to retain the law firm of Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP ("Young Conaway") as its Delaware bankruptcy counsel. Young Conaway has extensive experience in bankruptcy matters and represented the debtor pre-petition. The application discloses Young Conaway's hourly rates, retention agreement with the debtor, and that the firm does not hold any interest adverse to the debtor or the bankruptcy estate. The debtor believes that retaining Young Conaway as Delaware bankruptcy counsel is in the best interests of the estate. A hearing on the application will be held on July 27, 2012.
This document contains multiple choice questions regarding legal ethics and professional responsibility. Some key points covered include:
- A lawyer should perform a preliminary check for conflicts of interest before a prospective client provides any confidential information.
- If trust funds were improperly withdrawn, the lawyer must transfer the funds back to the trust account and self-report to the Law Society.
- If a client subsequently obtains documents relevant to a case after discovery, the lawyer must notify the opposing counsel and produce the documents.
- A lawyer cannot release funds held in trust pending resolution of a related legal matter without consent from all interested parties.
Powerpoint For Class Cert Hearing(Final)Dommermuth
This presentation was made at a hearing on a motion for class certification. The motion was denied and subsequently the Court granted summary judgment on all claims.
The debtor, Cordillera Golf Club, LLC, filed a motion seeking approval of procedures for interim compensation and reimbursement of expenses for professionals retained in the chapter 11 case. The motion requests that professionals be allowed to submit monthly fee applications for payment of 80% of fees and 100% of expenses, with interim fee applications submitted every three months. The procedures are consistent with those approved in other large chapter 11 cases and will help streamline the professional compensation process.
The debtor, Cordillera Golf Club, LLC, filed a motion seeking approval of procedures for interim compensation and reimbursement of expenses for professionals retained in the chapter 11 case. The motion requests that professionals be allowed to submit monthly fee applications for payment of 80% of fees and 100% of expenses, with interim fee applications submitted every three months. The procedures are intended to streamline the payment process in this large chapter 11 case.
Contingent Fee Representation Agreement Contract For Legal Services Between ...legal2
This document outlines a contingent fee representation agreement between a client and attorney Michael A. Schafer. It authorizes the attorney to investigate and potentially file a lawsuit related to an accident on behalf of the client. If a recovery is made, the attorney will receive 33.1% of the total as payment. The client remains responsible for expenses regardless of the outcome and must cooperate fully with the legal representation. Any modifications to the agreement must be in written form signed by both parties.
This presentation discusses settlements of workers\' compensation cases in Florida. The discussion includes federal law affecting personal injury cases, MSA\'s and CMS participation. General contract principles are also explored.
This document is a court decision in an Article 78 proceeding brought by Sheri Glederman against New York education officials. Glederman, a teacher, received a growth score of 1 out of 20 for the 2013-2014 school year, designating her performance as "ineffective". She challenged this score as arbitrary. The court found that Glederman has standing to bring the case because her growth score dropped significantly from the prior year, lowering her overall rating and harming her reputation. The court denied the motion to dismiss and reserved on Glederman's request for discovery pending the administrative record.
Washington Court Holds Stipulated Covenant Judgment Sets Minimum Amount of Da...NationalUnderwriter
Washington Court Holds Stipulated Covenant Judgment Sets Minimum Amount of Damages in Bad Faith Case. (from FC&S Legal: The Insurance Coverage Law Information Center)
Recently, Division One of the Court of Appeals of Washington State affirmed a jury verdict awarding $13 million in damages to a passenger injured in a car accident, finding that the $4.15 million agreed amount of the covenant
judgment in the insurance bad faith case sets a floor, not a ceiling, on the damages a jury can award.
In Miller v. Kenny and Safeco Ins. Co.,[1] the Court of Appeals ruled on several additional issues on appeal including whether evidence of an insurance company’s loss reserves is properly admissible at trial.
Home Inspector's Insurance & Risk Management - July 19, 2013Gerald Brunker
Home Inspector professional liability, general liability and other applicable insurances for home inspectors. Risk management tips and hints and home inspector claim information.
The debtor, Cordillera Golf Club, LLC, filed a motion seeking authorization to retain and pay certain professionals utilized in the ordinary course of business without requiring each professional to file a formal application for employment. The motion proposed procedures for retaining ordinary course professionals, including requiring the professionals to file declarations of disinterestedness, limiting monthly payments to $25,000 per professional absent a fee application, and requiring the debtor to file quarterly reports on payments to the professionals. The debtor argued this relief was necessary to avoid disruption to its business operations and pending litigation matters.
Landsman represents Alex Brown of the Saints - Investment News 2010.10.28 inv...blocklandsman
An NFL player sued his former financial advisers for $3.9 million, alleging they invested his money poorly in illiquid assets like airplane hangars and life insurance products without his knowledge. The player claims he trusted the advisers, who were long-time friends, and they took advantage of that trust for their own enrichment. The advisers deny the allegations and say the player was aware of all investment decisions.
Laurence Landsman interview 2001.02.28 usa today (viaticals)blocklandsman
An elderly couple invested a significant portion of their net worth in a viatical life insurance deal through an agent they trusted. However, their money was turned over to an escrow agent that was later accused of misappropriating millions of dollars from investors. While the agent who sold them the investment lost money as well and felt badly about their situation, over half of the couple's original investment was unable to be accounted for due to the collapse of the companies involved. Viatical investments carry high risks and seniors were warned to thoroughly research companies before investing.
Block and Landsman Award - Neuberger Bermanblocklandsman
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive function. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms.
This newsletter article summarizes two main topics:
1) It discusses a new option for investors to resolve disputes with registered investment advisors (RIAs) through voluntary FINRA arbitration rather than litigation. Arbitration is typically less expensive but provides limited discovery compared to court. Lawyers must consider these factors when deciding the best forum.
2) It provides tips for firms on conducting a compliance project during the typically quieter summer market period. Suggestions include evaluating the firm's compliance program, prioritizing projects that increase efficiencies, and selecting one or two meaningful projects to focus on rather than avoiding all projects.
Block & Landsman: Judgments and settlementsblocklandsman
The document describes several legal judgments and settlements involving investment fraud at various financial firms. They include a $5 million award against Lehman Brothers for principal protected note fraud, a $1.15 million settlement for an adviser who misappropriated an elderly client's funds, and a $700,000 settlement for an adviser who engaged in a pattern of selling unsuitable investments.
Block and Landsman Award - Kappel, breach of contractblocklandsman
The panel denied all claims by Advanced Equities, Inc. against Denise Kappel and awarded Kappel $260,328 in compensatory damages, $200,000 in compensatory and punitive damages under Title VII, and $80,000 in attorney's fees. The panel assessed Advanced Equities $27,040 in total fees, with a balance due of $19,825. Kappel was due a $775 refund.
This document outlines a contingency fee agreement between a client and a law office for legal representation related to a property damage claim. The attorney will receive either 33.3% or 40% of any recovery depending on whether a lawsuit is filed. The client is responsible for costs and expenses, but owes nothing if there is no recovery. Any disputes will be subject to binding arbitration. The agreement specifies the roles and responsibilities of both parties.
FLSA Litigation - Federal Court - MDFL Tampa - Fee Entitlement & MootnessPollard PLLC
Lawyers in FLSA cases and particularly on the defense side should view this as a cautionary tale: Tendering a check for the wages at issue does not moot the plaintiff's claim. FLSA claims are live until there is a judgment or a settlement approved by the court. And plaintiffs DO get their fees for litigating over the issue of attorneys' fees.
Simply put: A legitimate FLSA case, a skilled attorney on the plaintiff side, and defense counsel who do not understand the applicable legal framework make for disastrous results.
The debtor, Cordillera Golf Club, LLC, filed an application seeking approval to retain the law firm of Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP ("Young Conaway") as its Delaware bankruptcy counsel. Young Conaway has extensive experience in bankruptcy matters and represented the debtor pre-petition. The application discloses Young Conaway's hourly rates, retention agreement with the debtor, and that the firm does not hold any interest adverse to the debtor or the bankruptcy estate. The debtor believes that retaining Young Conaway as Delaware bankruptcy counsel is in the best interests of the estate. A hearing on the application will be held on July 27, 2012.
This document contains multiple choice questions regarding legal ethics and professional responsibility. Some key points covered include:
- A lawyer should perform a preliminary check for conflicts of interest before a prospective client provides any confidential information.
- If trust funds were improperly withdrawn, the lawyer must transfer the funds back to the trust account and self-report to the Law Society.
- If a client subsequently obtains documents relevant to a case after discovery, the lawyer must notify the opposing counsel and produce the documents.
- A lawyer cannot release funds held in trust pending resolution of a related legal matter without consent from all interested parties.
Powerpoint For Class Cert Hearing(Final)Dommermuth
This presentation was made at a hearing on a motion for class certification. The motion was denied and subsequently the Court granted summary judgment on all claims.
The debtor, Cordillera Golf Club, LLC, filed a motion seeking approval of procedures for interim compensation and reimbursement of expenses for professionals retained in the chapter 11 case. The motion requests that professionals be allowed to submit monthly fee applications for payment of 80% of fees and 100% of expenses, with interim fee applications submitted every three months. The procedures are consistent with those approved in other large chapter 11 cases and will help streamline the professional compensation process.
The debtor, Cordillera Golf Club, LLC, filed a motion seeking approval of procedures for interim compensation and reimbursement of expenses for professionals retained in the chapter 11 case. The motion requests that professionals be allowed to submit monthly fee applications for payment of 80% of fees and 100% of expenses, with interim fee applications submitted every three months. The procedures are intended to streamline the payment process in this large chapter 11 case.
Contingent Fee Representation Agreement Contract For Legal Services Between ...legal2
This document outlines a contingent fee representation agreement between a client and attorney Michael A. Schafer. It authorizes the attorney to investigate and potentially file a lawsuit related to an accident on behalf of the client. If a recovery is made, the attorney will receive 33.1% of the total as payment. The client remains responsible for expenses regardless of the outcome and must cooperate fully with the legal representation. Any modifications to the agreement must be in written form signed by both parties.
This presentation discusses settlements of workers\' compensation cases in Florida. The discussion includes federal law affecting personal injury cases, MSA\'s and CMS participation. General contract principles are also explored.
This document is a court decision in an Article 78 proceeding brought by Sheri Glederman against New York education officials. Glederman, a teacher, received a growth score of 1 out of 20 for the 2013-2014 school year, designating her performance as "ineffective". She challenged this score as arbitrary. The court found that Glederman has standing to bring the case because her growth score dropped significantly from the prior year, lowering her overall rating and harming her reputation. The court denied the motion to dismiss and reserved on Glederman's request for discovery pending the administrative record.
Washington Court Holds Stipulated Covenant Judgment Sets Minimum Amount of Da...NationalUnderwriter
Washington Court Holds Stipulated Covenant Judgment Sets Minimum Amount of Damages in Bad Faith Case. (from FC&S Legal: The Insurance Coverage Law Information Center)
Recently, Division One of the Court of Appeals of Washington State affirmed a jury verdict awarding $13 million in damages to a passenger injured in a car accident, finding that the $4.15 million agreed amount of the covenant
judgment in the insurance bad faith case sets a floor, not a ceiling, on the damages a jury can award.
In Miller v. Kenny and Safeco Ins. Co.,[1] the Court of Appeals ruled on several additional issues on appeal including whether evidence of an insurance company’s loss reserves is properly admissible at trial.
Home Inspector's Insurance & Risk Management - July 19, 2013Gerald Brunker
Home Inspector professional liability, general liability and other applicable insurances for home inspectors. Risk management tips and hints and home inspector claim information.
The debtor, Cordillera Golf Club, LLC, filed a motion seeking authorization to retain and pay certain professionals utilized in the ordinary course of business without requiring each professional to file a formal application for employment. The motion proposed procedures for retaining ordinary course professionals, including requiring the professionals to file declarations of disinterestedness, limiting monthly payments to $25,000 per professional absent a fee application, and requiring the debtor to file quarterly reports on payments to the professionals. The debtor argued this relief was necessary to avoid disruption to its business operations and pending litigation matters.
The debtor, Cordillera Golf Club, LLC, filed a motion seeking authorization to retain and pay certain professionals utilized in the ordinary course of business without requiring each professional to file a formal application for employment. The motion proposed procedures for retaining ordinary course professionals, including requiring the professionals to file declarations of disinterestedness, limiting monthly payments to $25,000 per professional absent a fee application, and requiring the debtor to file quarterly reports on payments to the professionals. The debtor argued this relief was necessary to avoid disruption to its business operations and pending litigation matters.
Dealing With Clients In Financial DistressArthur Howe
This presentation identifies issues that law firms and lawyers should consider when dealing with clients in financial distress. It is focused on Illinois law.
This presentation does not create an attorney-client relationship or provide legal advice. It may be deemed to be “Advertising Material.”
Class Actions: Insurance Related Claims
by Thomas F. Segalla
Whether prosecuting or opposing a motion for class certification, within the context of insurance related claims, there are certain principles that are critical to determining the allegations that are necessary to successfully assert such claims and the nature of any challenge to a motion to certify the punitive class. As the court noted, in the case of Deborah Mahon v. Chicago Title Insurance Co.:[1]
Paul Windust is a partner at Berding | Weil LLP specializing in community association law, construction defect, real estate, and business litigation. He has over 25 years of legal experience representing homeowners associations, defending directors and management companies, and litigating construction defect claims, CC&R violations, and governance disputes. Some of his significant cases include settling a $50,000 per unit construction defect claim and obtaining a $165,000 attorney fee award for an association after a 3-week trial.
Defendants Hyatt Corporation, AB/FH DFW Property, LLC, and The Services Companies filed an original answer in response to a lawsuit filed by Jacquelyn Medina. The defendants made a general denial of all claims and allegations in the plaintiff's petition. They asserted 13 defenses including sole proximate cause, failure to mitigate damages, contributory negligence, and rights under Texas civil practice law. The defendants joined the plaintiff's request for a jury trial and requested the plaintiff disclose information required under Texas rules of civil procedure.
Miles v. deutsche bank national trust company | find lawJustin Gluesing
This document summarizes a court case involving allegations of wrongful foreclosure. It discusses the plaintiff's claims that the loan servicer engaged in fraudulent behavior during loan modification negotiations, including changing the terms of agreements and demanding unnecessary fees. The court found that the plaintiff had adequately stated claims for breach of contract, fraud, and misrepresentation. It reversed the lower court's dismissal of these claims and the granting of summary judgment on the wrongful foreclosure claim, finding factual disputes remained. The court concluded the plaintiff may be entitled to damages beyond just the lost property value if the foreclosure was wrongful.
Pedal to the Court Understanding Your Rights after a Cycling Collision.pdfSunsetWestLegalGroup
The immediate step is an intelligent choice; don’t procrastinate. In the aftermath of the crash, taking care of yourself and taking quick steps can help you protect yourself from significant injuries. Make sure that you have collected the essential data and information.
Safeguarding Against Financial Crime: AML Compliance Regulations DemystifiedPROF. PAUL ALLIEU KAMARA
To ensure the integrity of financial systems and combat illicit financial activities, understanding AML (Anti-Money Laundering) compliance regulations is crucial for financial institutions and businesses. AML compliance regulations are designed to prevent money laundering and the financing of terrorist activities by imposing specific requirements on financial institutions, including customer due diligence, monitoring, and reporting of suspicious activities (GitHub Docs).
Integrating Advocacy and Legal Tactics to Tackle Online Consumer Complaintsseoglobal20
Our company bridges the gap between registered users and experienced advocates, offering a user-friendly online platform for seamless interaction. This platform empowers users to voice their grievances, particularly regarding online consumer issues. We streamline support by utilizing our team of expert advocates to provide consultancy services and initiate appropriate legal actions.
Our Online Consumer Legal Forum offers comprehensive guidance to individuals and businesses facing consumer complaints. With a dedicated team, round-the-clock support, and efficient complaint management, we are the preferred solution for addressing consumer grievances.
Our intuitive online interface allows individuals to register complaints, seek legal advice, and pursue justice conveniently. Users can submit complaints via mobile devices and send legal notices to companies directly through our portal.
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
Corporate Governance : Scope and Legal Frameworkdevaki57
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
MEANING
Corporate Governance refers to the way in which companies are governed and to what purpose. It identifies who has power and accountability, and who makes decisions. It is, in essence, a toolkit that enables management and the board to deal more effectively with the challenges of running a company.
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdfveteranlegal
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdf
Block and Landsman Award - Burlew
1. 10 of 20 DOCUMENTS
AWARD
NASD REGULATION, INC.
In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Marion K. Burlew, Claimant
v.
A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. and Robert Hodgkins, Respondents
CASE NO. 03-03765, Chicago, Illinios
2004 NASD Arb. LEXIS 1632
July 19, 2004
COUNSEL:
[*1] Marion K. Burlew ("Claimant") was represented by Lawrence M. Landsman, Esq., of Block & Landsman,
located in Chicago, Illinois. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., ("AGE") and Robert Hodgkins ("Hodgkins"), collectively
referred to as ("Respondents"), were represented by Jeffrey W. Coverdalle, Esq., of A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., located
in St. Louis, Missouri.
CASE-INFORMATION:
Nature of the Dispute: Customer v. Member firm and Associated Person.
The Statement of Claim was filed on or about May 23, 2003. Claimant signed the Uniform Submission Agreement on
April 24, 2003.
The Joint Statement of Answer was filed by Respondents on or about August 23, 2003. Respondent AGE signed the
Uniform Submission Agreement on June 9, 2003. Robert C. Hodgkins signed the Uniform Submission Agreement on
June 22, 2003.
CASE-SUMMARY:
Claimant alleged as follows: Breach of fiduciary duty; failure to supervise on the part of AGE; violations of the Illinois
Consumer Fraud Act; and common law fraud. Claimant's causes of action are in connection with transactions relating to
Enron stock.
Respondents denied the allegations set forth in the Statement of Claim. Respondents specifically stated as follows: the
Statement of Claim and each count thereof [*2] fails to state a cause of action upon which relief can be granted;
Claimant failed to act promptly and with due diligence to mitigate her damages; Claimant's claims are barred because
she authorized the alleged conduct; Claimant has waived and/or is esstopped from asserting these claims against
Respondents by virtue of her own conduct; Claimant ratified the alleged conduct; Claimant is barred in full or part by
the applicable statutes of limitation; Claimant is barred from any recovery by virtue of the doctrine of laches; Claimant
is barred from recovery because she assumed the risks of the alleged conduct; Claimant did not comply with the her
Client Agreement with AGE and is thus barred from recovery under the agreement; Claimant has alleged no activity or
specific conduct which constitutes fraud or breach of fiduciary duty; Claimant contributed to her damages; the alleged
damages were caused by market factors beyond the control of Respondents; Claimant has failed to allege a factual or
legal basis for an award of attorneys' fees or punitive damages; and, violations of the rules of a self-regulatory
organizations cannot constitute a cause of action under the law.
RELIEF-REQUESTED:
Claimant requested [*3] an award in the amount of $ 300,000.00 in actual damages, $ 100,000.00 in punitive damages,
Page 1
2. reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.
Respondents requested that the claims asserted against them be denied in their entirety and that they be awarded their
costs and attorneys' fees
OTHER-ISSUES:
Respondent Robert Hodgkins is deceased. There was no representative of his estate at the hearing.
The remaining parties have agreed that the Award in this matter may be executed in counterpart copies or that a
handwritten, signed Award may be entered. In either case, the parties have agreed to receive conformed copies of the
award while the original remains on file with the NASD Dispute Resolution ("NASD").
AWARD:
After considering the pleadings, the testimony, and the evidence presented at the hearing the undersigned arbitrators
have decided in full and final resolution of the issues submitted for determination as follows:
1. Respondent A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc. is solely liable for and shall pay to Claimant Marion K.
Burlew the sum of $ 100,000.00 in compensatory damages;
2. That to the extent not specifically awarded or otherwise provided for above, all other claims and
requests for relief by any party hereto [*4] are denied with prejudice; and,
3. Other than the Forum Fees noted below, the parties shall each bear all other costs and expenses
incurred by them in connection with this proceeding, including but not limited to attorneys fees, not
specifically awarded or otherwise provided for above.
FORUM-FEES:
Pursuant to the Code, the following fees are assessed:
Filing Fees
NASD Dispute Resolution will retain or collect the non-refundable filing fees for each claim:
Initial claim filing fee = $ 300.00
Member Fees
Member fees are assessed to each member firm that is a party in these proceedings or to the member firm that employed
the associated person at the time of the event giving rise to the dispute. In this matter, the member firm is AGE.
Member surcharge $ 1,700.00
Pre-hearing process fee $ 750.00
Hearing process fee $ 2,750.00
Total Member Fees $ 5,200.00
Forum Fees and Assessments
The Arbitration Panel assesses forum fees for each hearing session conducted. A hearing session is any meeting
Page 2
2004 NASD Arb. LEXIS 1632, *3
3. between the parties and the arbitrators, including a pre-hearing conference with the arbitrator, that lasts four (4) hours or
less. Fees associated with these proceedings [*5] are:
1 Pre-hearing session with Panel x 1,125.00 $ 1,125.00
February 13, 2004 1 session
5 Hearing sessions x 1,125.00 $ 5,625.00
July 13, 2004 2 sessions
July 14, 2004 2 sessions
July 15, 2004 1 session
Total Forum Fees $ 6,750.00
The Arbitration Panel has assessed $ 3,375.00 of the forum fees to Claimant.
The Arbitration Panel has assessed $ 3,375.00 of the forum fees to Respondent AGE.
FEE SUMMARY
Claimant, Marion K. Burlew, shall be and hereby is liable for:
Initial Filing Fee = $ 300.00
Forum Fees = $ 3,375.00
Total Fees = $ 3,675.00
Less payments = $ -1,425.00
Balance Due NASD Dispute Resolution = $ 2,250.00
Respondent, A.G. Edwards & Sons, shall be and hereby is liable for:
Member Fees = $ 5,200.00
Forum Fees = $ 3,375.00
Total Fees = $ 8,575.00
Less payments = $ 5,200.00
Balance Due NASD Dispute Resolution = $ 3,375.00
All balances are due to NASD Dispute Resolution
ARBITRATORS:
Concurring Arbitrators: James M. Casey, Public Arbitrator, Presiding Chair; Franklin P. Auwarter, Esq., Public
Arbitrator; Frank R. Niederman, Non-Public Arbitrator
Page 3
2004 NASD Arb. LEXIS 1632, *4