The document provides guidance on new civil filing fee requirements in Oregon effective October 1, 2009. It details that pleadings must include the prayer amount and that fees are based on the prayer amount and number of parties. The fee calculator must be used to determine the correct fees. Fees apply differently based on whether the claim is for a monetary amount, non-monetary relief, or under $10,000. Third party complaints also have separate fee requirements.
State Compensation to Victims of Crime in Sweden UNDPhr
The document summarizes Sweden's Crime Victim Compensation and Support Authority. It established in 1994 and provides state compensation to crime victims. It administers over 10,000 applications annually, paying 98 million SEK in 2011. Victims can receive compensation for personal injuries, lost income, pain and suffering from crimes like rape, abuse, and murder. The authority also pursues claims against offenders to recoup costs, maintaining over 2,000 active payment plans despite many offenders' limited financial capacity.
This newsletter article summarizes two main topics:
1) It discusses a new option for investors to resolve disputes with registered investment advisors (RIAs) through voluntary FINRA arbitration rather than litigation. Arbitration is typically less expensive but provides limited discovery compared to court. Lawyers must consider these factors when deciding the best forum.
2) It provides tips for firms on conducting a compliance project during the typically quieter summer market period. Suggestions include evaluating the firm's compliance program, prioritizing projects that increase efficiencies, and selecting one or two meaningful projects to focus on rather than avoiding all projects.
Claimant alleged as follows: Negligence; breach of fiduciary duty, unsuitable investments, and consumer fraud. Claimant's causes of action are in connection with technology related common stock.
Block & Landsman: Judgments and settlementsblocklandsman
The document describes several legal judgments and settlements involving investment fraud at various financial firms. They include a $5 million award against Lehman Brothers for principal protected note fraud, a $1.15 million settlement for an adviser who misappropriated an elderly client's funds, and a $700,000 settlement for an adviser who engaged in a pattern of selling unsuitable investments.
The document provides guidance on new civil filing fee requirements in Oregon effective October 1, 2009. It details that pleadings must include the prayer amount and that fees are based on the prayer amount and number of parties. The fee calculator must be used to determine the correct fees. Fees apply differently based on whether the claim is for a monetary amount, non-monetary relief, or under $10,000. Third party complaints also have separate fee requirements.
State Compensation to Victims of Crime in Sweden UNDPhr
The document summarizes Sweden's Crime Victim Compensation and Support Authority. It established in 1994 and provides state compensation to crime victims. It administers over 10,000 applications annually, paying 98 million SEK in 2011. Victims can receive compensation for personal injuries, lost income, pain and suffering from crimes like rape, abuse, and murder. The authority also pursues claims against offenders to recoup costs, maintaining over 2,000 active payment plans despite many offenders' limited financial capacity.
This newsletter article summarizes two main topics:
1) It discusses a new option for investors to resolve disputes with registered investment advisors (RIAs) through voluntary FINRA arbitration rather than litigation. Arbitration is typically less expensive but provides limited discovery compared to court. Lawyers must consider these factors when deciding the best forum.
2) It provides tips for firms on conducting a compliance project during the typically quieter summer market period. Suggestions include evaluating the firm's compliance program, prioritizing projects that increase efficiencies, and selecting one or two meaningful projects to focus on rather than avoiding all projects.
Claimant alleged as follows: Negligence; breach of fiduciary duty, unsuitable investments, and consumer fraud. Claimant's causes of action are in connection with technology related common stock.
Block & Landsman: Judgments and settlementsblocklandsman
The document describes several legal judgments and settlements involving investment fraud at various financial firms. They include a $5 million award against Lehman Brothers for principal protected note fraud, a $1.15 million settlement for an adviser who misappropriated an elderly client's funds, and a $700,000 settlement for an adviser who engaged in a pattern of selling unsuitable investments.
In the Matter of the Arbitration Between: Walter A. Moede, Jr., Claimant v. Web Street Securities, Inc., Johnny Fiscus, and Edward McCarthy, Respondents
Block and Landsman Award - Kappel, breach of contractblocklandsman
The panel denied all claims by Advanced Equities, Inc. against Denise Kappel and awarded Kappel $260,328 in compensatory damages, $200,000 in compensatory and punitive damages under Title VII, and $80,000 in attorney's fees. The panel assessed Advanced Equities $27,040 in total fees, with a balance due of $19,825. Kappel was due a $775 refund.
Doc1014 attorney volker going for $1 m in feesmalp2009
Lynn Tillotson Pinker & Cox, LLP ("LTPC") seeks approval of $1,000,000 in attorney fees and $2,958.01 in expenses for a total of $1,002,958.01. The fees represent LTPC's one-third contingency fee from the Trustee's $3,000,000 settlement with Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP f/k/a Olshan Grundman Frome Rozenzweig & Wolosky, LLP and David Adler. LTPC was employed as special litigation counsel and filed an adversary proceeding against Olshan, responding to motions to dismiss and ultimately reaching the settlement. The expenses are for transcripts, legal
Doc1014 attorney volker going for $1 m in feesmalp2009
Lynn Tillotson Pinker & Cox, LLP ("LTPC") seeks approval of $1,000,000 in attorney fees and $2,958.01 in expenses for a total of $1,002,958.01. The fees represent LTPC's one-third contingency fee from the Trustee's $3,000,000 settlement with Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP f/k/a Olshan Grundman Frome Rozenzweig & Wolosky, LLP and David Adler. LTPC was employed as special litigation counsel and filed an adversary proceeding against Olshan, responding to motions to dismiss and ultimately reaching the settlement. The expenses are for transcripts, legal
This document is a fee application cover sheet and application from Robbins Tapp Cobb & Associates, PLLC seeking approval of $122,783.48 in accounting fees and expenses for services provided to the Trustee from July 2011 to February 2012 in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case of FirstPlus Financial Group, Inc. The application provides details of services rendered, hourly rates, fees already approved, and argues that the fees and expenses requested meet legal standards and should be approved.
Sample ex parte application for TRO and preliminary injunction in United Stat...LegalDocsPro
This sample ex parte application for temporary restraining order in United States District Court also requests the issuance of a preliminary injunction pending the trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a) and (b) on the grounds that the plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer, substantial irreparable harm if injunctive relief is not granted. The sample on which this preview is based is 16 pages and includes brief instructions, a memorandum of points and authorities with citations to case law and statutory authority, sample declaration and proposed order. The author is an entrepreneur and retired litigation paralegal that worked in California and Federal litigation from January 1995 through September 2017 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided.
Doc1031 pay day for lynn tillotson pinker & cox $189,945.99malp2009
This document is a fourth application filed by Lynn Tillotson Pinker & Cox, LLP ("LTPC") seeking approval of attorney's fees and reimbursement of expenses from the bankruptcy estate of FirstPlus Financial Group, Inc. LTPC requests approval of $183,333.33 in attorney's fees based on its one-third contingency fee from a $550,000 settlement with Buckno Lisicky & Company, P.C. and Anthony Buczek. LTPC also requests $6,542.66 in expense reimbursements. In total, LTPC requests approval of $189,875.99 for fees and expenses incurred from May 2014 to May 2015.
Maria bought a pair of sunglasses from Syarikat Nice 2C that left marks on her cheeks, making her uncomfortable. She asked for a replacement pair but was refused. Maria wants to file a claim against Syarikat Nice 2C at the Tribunal for Consumer Claims. The Tribunal may order Syarikat Nice 2C to replace or repair the sunglasses, refund Maria's money, or award her compensation for damages suffered from the marks. Maria must follow procedures like filing a statement of claim and attending a hearing to pursue her claim.
Law Society of Singapore v Tan Phuay Khiang [2007] SGHC 83surrenderyourthrone
This document summarizes a court case from 2007 regarding a lawyer, Tan Phuay Khiang, who was accused of misconduct in his representation of clients in the sale of their home. Specifically:
1) Tan represented clients in selling their home, but prepared documents authorizing distribution of sale proceeds to parties he had previous relationships with, including ones who referred clients to him, without properly advising the clients or protecting their interests.
2) A disciplinary committee found Tan guilty of failing to advance his clients' interests, but dismissed other charges regarding specific documents.
3) The court ultimately suspended Tan from practice for two years for his misconduct in handling conflicts of interest and not protecting his clients.
Fee award dollar general raymond dieppa chris wadsworthRaymond R. Dieppa
This document is a judgment ordering the defendant Dollar General to pay attorney's fees and costs to the plaintiff Michele Barry. It summarizes the background of the personal injury case, in which Barry sued Dollar General for injuries from a slip and fall in their store and was awarded $250,087 by a jury. The court found Dollar General's defense counsel engaged in unacceptable and willful misconduct by making false statements in their opening argument that directly contradicted video evidence. As a result, the court sanctioned Dollar General and its counsel under Florida statute 57.105. The court determined the attorney fees and costs requested by Barry's counsel were reasonable.
McCarthy's longtime client Arnold Munson and his son Donald have been sued jointly for an automobile accident involving Donald. McCarthy has been representing Donald and the pleadings have now been amended to include Arnold. McCarthy can represent both defendants if he obtains informed consent in writing from both. They must understand the risks of sharing confidential information and limiting certain defenses, as well as the lawyer's conflicting duties of loyalty. So long as both consent is obtained, joint representation would not violate the Rules of Professional Conduct for this lawsuit.
This document summarizes an arbitration case between Bruce Lanzetta and several respondents. Lanzetta alleged breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and other claims relating to private placement securities. Some respondents settled or were withdrawn from the case. The arbitrator found respondents Gregory Flemming and Lawrence Allen Banks liable by default and awarded Lanzetta $10,000 in compensatory damages, $225 to reimburse filing fees, and $300 for the paper decision fee. FINRA assessed fees to the respondents.
The debtor, Cordillera Golf Club, LLC, filed an application seeking approval to retain the law firm of Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP ("Young Conaway") as its Delaware bankruptcy counsel. Young Conaway has extensive experience in bankruptcy matters and represented the debtor pre-petition. The application discloses Young Conaway's hourly rates, retention agreement with the debtor, and that the firm does not hold any interest adverse to the debtor or the bankruptcy estate. The debtor believes that retaining Young Conaway as Delaware bankruptcy counsel is in the best interests of the estate. A hearing on the application will be held on July 27, 2012.
In a small claims matter, a claimant representing himself lost a total of £1,262.54 at trial. The defendant was awarded costs higher than the usual maximum of £280 due to several errors made by the claimant. Specifically, the claimant (1) incorrectly named the parties, (2) attempted to rely on irrelevant areas of law, (3) failed to provide any evidence to support his claim despite court orders, and (4) tried to submit witness statements past the deadline. The judge found that the claimant failed to meet the burden of proof overall. The document advises potential small claims litigants to seek legal advice before bringing a claim themselves to avoid costly mistakes.
FLSA Litigation - Federal Court - MDFL Tampa - Fee Entitlement & MootnessPollard PLLC
Lawyers in FLSA cases and particularly on the defense side should view this as a cautionary tale: Tendering a check for the wages at issue does not moot the plaintiff's claim. FLSA claims are live until there is a judgment or a settlement approved by the court. And plaintiffs DO get their fees for litigating over the issue of attorneys' fees.
Simply put: A legitimate FLSA case, a skilled attorney on the plaintiff side, and defense counsel who do not understand the applicable legal framework make for disastrous results.
Claimants asserted the following causes of action: breach of contract; negligence; and failure to transfer. The causes of action related to Claimants' investments in infinera Corp. ("INFN") [*3] through limited liability companies ("LLCs") organized by AEI that, in turn invested in INFN.
John J. Pankauski is a partner with Pankauski Hauser PLLC in West Palm Beach, Florida. Mr. Pankauski has spent over 20 years of his career handling matters involving wills, trusts, estates, probates, and guardianships. His practice is limited to disputes, trials and appeals of such matters. He is AV Preeminent rated by Martindale Hubel.
Invoicing and Collecting for your Legal Serviceskhecker
Thoughts and musings on how to get paid for your legal services. THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE. I AM NOT YOUR LAWYER. I WILL NOT BE YOUR LAWYER if you read this. Use at your own risk.
The Dodd-Frank Act aims to overhaul rules governing brokers and their relationship with investors. It authorizes the SEC to impose fiduciary duties on brokers, requiring them to put clients' interests ahead of their own. It also allows the SEC to reform securities arbitration rules to give investors a more level playing field. This is expected to increase protections for investors and hold brokers to higher standards of care. The SEC will likely require brokers to meet the same fiduciary standard as investment advisors. It may also address issues like mandatory arbitration agreements and the inclusion of "industry arbitrators" to make the dispute resolution process fairer for investors.
In the Matter of the Arbitration Between: Walter A. Moede, Jr., Claimant v. Web Street Securities, Inc., Johnny Fiscus, and Edward McCarthy, Respondents
Block and Landsman Award - Kappel, breach of contractblocklandsman
The panel denied all claims by Advanced Equities, Inc. against Denise Kappel and awarded Kappel $260,328 in compensatory damages, $200,000 in compensatory and punitive damages under Title VII, and $80,000 in attorney's fees. The panel assessed Advanced Equities $27,040 in total fees, with a balance due of $19,825. Kappel was due a $775 refund.
Doc1014 attorney volker going for $1 m in feesmalp2009
Lynn Tillotson Pinker & Cox, LLP ("LTPC") seeks approval of $1,000,000 in attorney fees and $2,958.01 in expenses for a total of $1,002,958.01. The fees represent LTPC's one-third contingency fee from the Trustee's $3,000,000 settlement with Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP f/k/a Olshan Grundman Frome Rozenzweig & Wolosky, LLP and David Adler. LTPC was employed as special litigation counsel and filed an adversary proceeding against Olshan, responding to motions to dismiss and ultimately reaching the settlement. The expenses are for transcripts, legal
Doc1014 attorney volker going for $1 m in feesmalp2009
Lynn Tillotson Pinker & Cox, LLP ("LTPC") seeks approval of $1,000,000 in attorney fees and $2,958.01 in expenses for a total of $1,002,958.01. The fees represent LTPC's one-third contingency fee from the Trustee's $3,000,000 settlement with Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP f/k/a Olshan Grundman Frome Rozenzweig & Wolosky, LLP and David Adler. LTPC was employed as special litigation counsel and filed an adversary proceeding against Olshan, responding to motions to dismiss and ultimately reaching the settlement. The expenses are for transcripts, legal
This document is a fee application cover sheet and application from Robbins Tapp Cobb & Associates, PLLC seeking approval of $122,783.48 in accounting fees and expenses for services provided to the Trustee from July 2011 to February 2012 in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case of FirstPlus Financial Group, Inc. The application provides details of services rendered, hourly rates, fees already approved, and argues that the fees and expenses requested meet legal standards and should be approved.
Sample ex parte application for TRO and preliminary injunction in United Stat...LegalDocsPro
This sample ex parte application for temporary restraining order in United States District Court also requests the issuance of a preliminary injunction pending the trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(a) and (b) on the grounds that the plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer, substantial irreparable harm if injunctive relief is not granted. The sample on which this preview is based is 16 pages and includes brief instructions, a memorandum of points and authorities with citations to case law and statutory authority, sample declaration and proposed order. The author is an entrepreneur and retired litigation paralegal that worked in California and Federal litigation from January 1995 through September 2017 and has created over 300 sample legal documents for sale. Note that the author is NOT an attorney and no guarantee or warranty is provided.
Doc1031 pay day for lynn tillotson pinker & cox $189,945.99malp2009
This document is a fourth application filed by Lynn Tillotson Pinker & Cox, LLP ("LTPC") seeking approval of attorney's fees and reimbursement of expenses from the bankruptcy estate of FirstPlus Financial Group, Inc. LTPC requests approval of $183,333.33 in attorney's fees based on its one-third contingency fee from a $550,000 settlement with Buckno Lisicky & Company, P.C. and Anthony Buczek. LTPC also requests $6,542.66 in expense reimbursements. In total, LTPC requests approval of $189,875.99 for fees and expenses incurred from May 2014 to May 2015.
Maria bought a pair of sunglasses from Syarikat Nice 2C that left marks on her cheeks, making her uncomfortable. She asked for a replacement pair but was refused. Maria wants to file a claim against Syarikat Nice 2C at the Tribunal for Consumer Claims. The Tribunal may order Syarikat Nice 2C to replace or repair the sunglasses, refund Maria's money, or award her compensation for damages suffered from the marks. Maria must follow procedures like filing a statement of claim and attending a hearing to pursue her claim.
Law Society of Singapore v Tan Phuay Khiang [2007] SGHC 83surrenderyourthrone
This document summarizes a court case from 2007 regarding a lawyer, Tan Phuay Khiang, who was accused of misconduct in his representation of clients in the sale of their home. Specifically:
1) Tan represented clients in selling their home, but prepared documents authorizing distribution of sale proceeds to parties he had previous relationships with, including ones who referred clients to him, without properly advising the clients or protecting their interests.
2) A disciplinary committee found Tan guilty of failing to advance his clients' interests, but dismissed other charges regarding specific documents.
3) The court ultimately suspended Tan from practice for two years for his misconduct in handling conflicts of interest and not protecting his clients.
Fee award dollar general raymond dieppa chris wadsworthRaymond R. Dieppa
This document is a judgment ordering the defendant Dollar General to pay attorney's fees and costs to the plaintiff Michele Barry. It summarizes the background of the personal injury case, in which Barry sued Dollar General for injuries from a slip and fall in their store and was awarded $250,087 by a jury. The court found Dollar General's defense counsel engaged in unacceptable and willful misconduct by making false statements in their opening argument that directly contradicted video evidence. As a result, the court sanctioned Dollar General and its counsel under Florida statute 57.105. The court determined the attorney fees and costs requested by Barry's counsel were reasonable.
McCarthy's longtime client Arnold Munson and his son Donald have been sued jointly for an automobile accident involving Donald. McCarthy has been representing Donald and the pleadings have now been amended to include Arnold. McCarthy can represent both defendants if he obtains informed consent in writing from both. They must understand the risks of sharing confidential information and limiting certain defenses, as well as the lawyer's conflicting duties of loyalty. So long as both consent is obtained, joint representation would not violate the Rules of Professional Conduct for this lawsuit.
This document summarizes an arbitration case between Bruce Lanzetta and several respondents. Lanzetta alleged breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, and other claims relating to private placement securities. Some respondents settled or were withdrawn from the case. The arbitrator found respondents Gregory Flemming and Lawrence Allen Banks liable by default and awarded Lanzetta $10,000 in compensatory damages, $225 to reimburse filing fees, and $300 for the paper decision fee. FINRA assessed fees to the respondents.
The debtor, Cordillera Golf Club, LLC, filed an application seeking approval to retain the law firm of Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP ("Young Conaway") as its Delaware bankruptcy counsel. Young Conaway has extensive experience in bankruptcy matters and represented the debtor pre-petition. The application discloses Young Conaway's hourly rates, retention agreement with the debtor, and that the firm does not hold any interest adverse to the debtor or the bankruptcy estate. The debtor believes that retaining Young Conaway as Delaware bankruptcy counsel is in the best interests of the estate. A hearing on the application will be held on July 27, 2012.
In a small claims matter, a claimant representing himself lost a total of £1,262.54 at trial. The defendant was awarded costs higher than the usual maximum of £280 due to several errors made by the claimant. Specifically, the claimant (1) incorrectly named the parties, (2) attempted to rely on irrelevant areas of law, (3) failed to provide any evidence to support his claim despite court orders, and (4) tried to submit witness statements past the deadline. The judge found that the claimant failed to meet the burden of proof overall. The document advises potential small claims litigants to seek legal advice before bringing a claim themselves to avoid costly mistakes.
FLSA Litigation - Federal Court - MDFL Tampa - Fee Entitlement & MootnessPollard PLLC
Lawyers in FLSA cases and particularly on the defense side should view this as a cautionary tale: Tendering a check for the wages at issue does not moot the plaintiff's claim. FLSA claims are live until there is a judgment or a settlement approved by the court. And plaintiffs DO get their fees for litigating over the issue of attorneys' fees.
Simply put: A legitimate FLSA case, a skilled attorney on the plaintiff side, and defense counsel who do not understand the applicable legal framework make for disastrous results.
Claimants asserted the following causes of action: breach of contract; negligence; and failure to transfer. The causes of action related to Claimants' investments in infinera Corp. ("INFN") [*3] through limited liability companies ("LLCs") organized by AEI that, in turn invested in INFN.
John J. Pankauski is a partner with Pankauski Hauser PLLC in West Palm Beach, Florida. Mr. Pankauski has spent over 20 years of his career handling matters involving wills, trusts, estates, probates, and guardianships. His practice is limited to disputes, trials and appeals of such matters. He is AV Preeminent rated by Martindale Hubel.
Invoicing and Collecting for your Legal Serviceskhecker
Thoughts and musings on how to get paid for your legal services. THIS IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE. I AM NOT YOUR LAWYER. I WILL NOT BE YOUR LAWYER if you read this. Use at your own risk.
Similar to Block and Landsman, James Neunuebel (20)
The Dodd-Frank Act aims to overhaul rules governing brokers and their relationship with investors. It authorizes the SEC to impose fiduciary duties on brokers, requiring them to put clients' interests ahead of their own. It also allows the SEC to reform securities arbitration rules to give investors a more level playing field. This is expected to increase protections for investors and hold brokers to higher standards of care. The SEC will likely require brokers to meet the same fiduciary standard as investment advisors. It may also address issues like mandatory arbitration agreements and the inclusion of "industry arbitrators" to make the dispute resolution process fairer for investors.
Landsman article - the effect of laughlin v. evanston hospital 1997.06blocklandsman
An article written by Laurence Landsman for the Loyola Consumer Law Reporter regarding the effect of Laughlin v. Evanston Hospital on Consumer Fraud Act Claims For Nondeceptive Unfair Acts or Practices.
Landsman represents Alex Brown of the Saints - Investment News 2010.10.28 inv...blocklandsman
An NFL player sued his former financial advisers for $3.9 million, alleging they invested his money poorly in illiquid assets like airplane hangars and life insurance products without his knowledge. The player claims he trusted the advisers, who were long-time friends, and they took advantage of that trust for their own enrichment. The advisers deny the allegations and say the player was aware of all investment decisions.
Laurence Landsman interview 2001.02.28 usa today (viaticals)blocklandsman
An elderly couple invested a significant portion of their net worth in a viatical life insurance deal through an agent they trusted. However, their money was turned over to an escrow agent that was later accused of misappropriating millions of dollars from investors. While the agent who sold them the investment lost money as well and felt badly about their situation, over half of the couple's original investment was unable to be accounted for due to the collapse of the companies involved. Viatical investments carry high risks and seniors were warned to thoroughly research companies before investing.
Block and Landsman Award - Neuberger Bermanblocklandsman
The document discusses the benefits of exercise for mental health. Regular physical activity can help reduce anxiety and depression and improve mood and cognitive function. Exercise causes chemical changes in the brain that may help protect against mental illness and improve symptoms.
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence LawyersHarpreetSaini48
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...lawyersonia
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...Massimo Talia
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Block and Landsman, James Neunuebel
1. 9 of 20 DOCUMENTS
AWARD
NASD REGULATION, INC.
In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Jannine Del Muro, Claimant
v.
James Neunuebel and Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Respondents
CASE NO. 03-03089, Chicago, Illinois
2004 NASD Arb. LEXIS 1635
July 27, 2004
COUNSEL:
[*1] Jannine Del Muro ("Claimant") was represented by Alan Block, Esq. of Block and Landsman, located in Bruce
Chicago, Illinois. James Neunuebel, ("Neunebel"), and Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, ("Merrill Lynch"),
Hereinafter referred to as ("Respondents") were represented by Peter Cooper, Esq. of Lawrence, Kamin, Saunders &
Uhlenhop, located in Chicago, Illinois.
CASE-INFORMATION:
Nature of the Dispute: Customers v. Member firm and Associated Person.
Claimant filed her Statement of Claim on or about April 28, 2003.
Claimant signed a Uniform Submission Agreement on or about May 6, 2003.
Respondents filed the Joint Statement of Answer on or about July 31, 2003.
Respondent Merrill Lynch signed a Uniform Submission Agreement on May 10, 2004.
Respondent Neunuebel signed a Uniform Submission Agreement on May 7, 2004.
CASE-SUMMARY:
Claimant alleged as follows: Negligence; breach of fiduciary duty, unsuitable investments, and consumer fraud.
Claimant's causes of action are in connection with technology related common stock.
Unless specially admitted in their Statement of Answer, Respondents denied the allegations in the Statement of Claim
and submitted the following affirmative defenses; Claimant failed to mitigate her [*2] damages; Claimant ratified all
trades entered in her account; Merrill Lynch acted in good faith and cannot be held liable as a control person; and, after
being fully informed, Claimant followed and expressly agreed with the recommended investments.
RELIEF-REQUESTED:
Claimant requested an award in the amount of $ 571,000.00 in actual damages, reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.
Respondents requested that the claims asserted against them be dismissed in their entirety, that they be awarded costs of
defense of this action, including reasonable attorneys' fees, filing fees and costs. Respondent Neunuebel requested that
all references to the above captioned arbitration be expunged from his registration records maintained by the NASD
Central Registration Depository ("CRD").
OTHER-ISSUES:
The parties have agreed that the Award in this matter may be executed in counterpart copies or that a handwritten,
signed Award may be entered. In either case, the parties have agreed to receive conformed copies of the award while the
Page 1
2. original remains on file with ("NASD").
The Panel unanimously denied Neunuebel's expungement request.
AWARD:
After considering the pleadings, the testimony, and the evidence presented at the hearing the undersigned [*3]
arbitrators have decided in full and final resolution of the issues submitted for determination as follows:
1. Respondents Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith and James Neunuebel are jointly and severally
liable and shall pay to Claimant Jannine Del Muro the sum of $ 150,000.00 in compensatory damages;
2. Respondent James Neunuebel's expungement request is hereby denied;
3. That to the extent not specifically awarded or otherwise provided for above, all other claims and
requests for relief by any party hereto are denied with prejudice; and,
4. Other than the Forum Fees noted below, the parties shall each bear all other costs and expenses
incurred by them in connection with this proceeding, including but not limited to attorneys fees, not
specifically awarded or otherwise provided for above.
FORUM-FEES:
Pursuant to the Code, the following fees are assessed:
Filing Fees
NASD Dispute Resolution will retain or collect the non-refundable filing fees for each claim:
Initial claim filing fee = $ 375.00
Member Fees
Member fees are assessed to each member firm that is a party in these proceedings or to the member firm that employed
the associated person at the time of the [*4] event giving rise to the dispute. In this matter, the member firm is Merrill
Lynch.
Member surcharge $ 2,250.00
Pre-hearing process fee $ 750.00
Hearing process fee $ 4,000.00
Total Member Fees $ 7,000.00
Forum Fees and Assessments
The Panel assesses forum fees for each hearing session conducted. A hearing session is any meeting between the parties
and the arbitrators, including a pre-hearing conference with the arbitrator, that lasts four (4) hours or less. Fees
associated with these proceedings are:
One (1) Pre-hearing session with x $ 1,200.00
Panel
1,200.00
Page 2
2004 NASD Arb. LEXIS 1635, *2
3. December 5, 2003 1 session
Three (3) Hearing sessions x 1,200.00 $ 3,600.00
July 20, 2004 3 sessions $
Total Forum Fees $ 4,800.00
The Panel has assessed $ 2,400.00 of the forum fees to Respondents Merrill Lynch and Neunuebel jointly and severally.
The Panel has assessed $ 2,400.00 of the forum fees to Claimant.
FEE SUMMARY
Claimant, Jannine Del Muro, shall be and hereby is liable for:
Initial Filing Fee = $ 375.00
Forum Fee = $ 2,400.00
Total Fees = $ 2,775.00
Less payments = $ -1,575.00
Balance Due NASD Dispute Resolution = $ 1,200.00
[*5]
Respondent Merrill Lynch shall be and hereby is solely liable for:
Member Fees = $ 7,000.00
Total Fees = $ 7,000.00
Less payments = $ 7,000.00
Balance Due NASD Dispute Resolution = $ 00
Respondents Merrill Lynch and Neunuebel are jointly and severally liable for:
Forum Fees = $ 2,400.00
Less payments = $ .00
Balance Due NASD Dispute Resolution = $ 2,400.00
All balances are due to NASD Dispute Resolution
ARBITRATORS:
Concurring Arbitrators: Leon Fox, J.D., Public Arbitrator, Presiding Chair; Gregory G. Gocek, Public Arbitrator; Doris
H. Geck, Non-Public Arbitrator
Page 3
2004 NASD Arb. LEXIS 1635, *4