SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 16
Perspectives from the states
Recommendations
Highlights from findings of the SREB reports
Benchmarking State Implementation of
College- and Career-Readiness
Standards, Aligned Assessments
and Related Reforms January 2015
2|
Contents
Perspectives
Recommendations
What successes, challenges and next steps did
interviewees articulate?
What recommendations does SREB draw from the study?
SREB researchers interviewed leaders from state departments of
education, state boards of education, unions, higher education and
business and community organizations, as well as legislators’ and
governors’ staff, teachers, principals and district superintendents.
page 12
Perspectives from the states
Recommendations
More about the study
page 4
Successes, challenges, next steps
Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards
page 14
Participating states page 3
3|
Benchmarking
College- and
Career-Readiness
Standards
Participating states
Louisiana
Maryland
Mississippi
North Carolina
South Carolina
Tennessee
West Virginia
Other regions
Colorado
New York
Pennsylvania
Florida participated in preliminary (March 2014) but not final reports.
This SREB project supports
states in the monumental
task of implementing higher
statewide standards by tracking
progress and bringing states
together to learn from and
collaborate with one another.
SREB region
Alabama
Delaware
Georgia
Kentucky
Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards
4|
Trends across the states
Successes
Comprehensive efforts
All 14 state departments of
education have undertaken
comprehensive efforts to lead and
support implementation of their
state’s new college- and career-
readiness standards, aligned
assessments and related reforms.
Interviewees appreciated how
much their state departments of
education have done to chart the
course and provide local systems,
schools, teachers and leaders the
support and resources they need.
Some state departments of
education have expanded their
roles in response to unprece-
dented requests for support from
the field, providing more kinds of
support and resources than at any
time in the past.
Good reviews
Interviewees gave good reviews
of the standards and of states’
efforts.
Teachers and principals, in
particular, shared that the new
standards are an improvement.
Many noted that students have
access to a more consistently
high-quality education.
Teachers reported that
professional learning and teaching
resources aligned to the standards
have been extremely valuable in
their daily practices and for their
professional growth.
Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards
Interviewees in many roles
cited these successes most
commonly.
5|
Trends across the states
Successes
Unprecedented collaboration
Within states: State departments
of education are collaborating with
other leaders, educators and
stakeholders. Department staff in
many states reported that they
have been working extensively
with regional entities, districts,
schools and teachers — more so
than most could remember.
State board of education
members and governors’ staffs in
some states reported that a key
success has been involvement of
the business sector and the
community in building support.
Among states: Departments
have also partnered across states
to enrich their work. The multi-
state assessment consortia,
particularly PARCC and Smarter
Balanced, are the most visible of
these partnerships.
Among educators: Educators
are also sharing instructional
resources and materials, formally
and informally. The tools
interviewees cited sharing most
often are materials on New York’s
EngageNY website and resources
from Achieve, Student
Achievement Partners, the
Council of Chief State School
Officers, Literacy Design
Collaborative and Mathematics
Design Collaborative. Teachers
expressed great appreciation for
these resources.
Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards
Interviewees in many roles
cited these successes most
commonly.
6|
Trends across the states
Successes
Collaboration with higher ed
Interviewees praised partnerships
between leaders in K-12 and
higher education. This
unprecedented collaboration
builds a foundation for continued
work to align policies and foster
shared understandings of the
knowledge and skills needed for
success in K-12 classrooms,
college courses, job training and
careers.
Supplemental funding
Department of education staff
reported that additional funding,
such as grants from Race to the
Top and private foundations, have
been essential in bolstering their
efforts.
Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards
Interviewees in many roles
cited these successes most
commonly.
7|
Trends across the states
Challenges
Size of the effort
Interviewees were realistic about
the sea change in public
education required by the
readiness standards and related
reforms. The work has just begun,
and state departments of
education have undertaken it with
small staffs and tight budgets,
making their efforts impressive —
and fragile.
Sustainability
Large infusions of funding, such
as Race to the Top grants and
other external support, bolstered
early initiatives in many states. As
state departments of education
prepare for the future, they must
determine how to continue or
modify their initiatives when the
temporary funding ends.
Integration of reforms
Teachers, especially, highlighted
the need for better integration of
the new standards and
assessments with other,
concurrent state reforms such as
new accountability systems and
new teacher and leader evaluation
systems.
Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards
Interviewees in many roles
cited these challenges most
commonly.
8|
Trends across the states
Challenges
Uneven local implementation
Teachers, principals and district
superintendents reported that the
readiness of teachers and local
leaders to implement the new
standards varies considerably
across districts and even within
schools.
One contributing factor many
interviewees noted is the variation
in amount and quality of
professional learning and
implementation resources that
reaches teachers and leaders.
Educators gave high marks to the
professional learning and other
support their state departments
have provided. But they said that
these supports have not reached
all who need it. Teachers still need
more time, resources and support.
Assessment technology
While many districts and schools
have the technology infrastructure
and capacity to administer new
computer-based assessments,
many still do not. This is especially
acute in small and rural districts.
Communication
Despite outreach and training from
state departments of education,
educators and the public still need
to better understand the new
readiness standards, how they
differ from previous standards,
and how the more rigorous
demands are related to other
changes.
.
Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards
Interviewees in many roles
cited these challenges most
commonly.
9|
Trends across the states
Next steps
Pressing ahead with standards
Some states are launching
initiatives to build on and support
the standards they adopted and
continue to implement.
Delaware Governor Jack Markell
helped launch the Partnership
for Higher Standards. West
Virginia joined the Improving
Student Learning at Scale
Policy Collaborative, a
partnership of states and national
organizations.
Tennessee launched a STEM
Leadership Council to provide
guidance on STEM initiatives.
2013 legislation in West Virginia
and Maryland requires further
alignment of college- and career-
readiness reforms across K-12
and higher education.
Reviewing, changing standards
Some states have taken another
look at their new standards.
Formal reviews of how six states
adopted and implemented
standards and assessments may
bring changes.
In Mississippi and New York, the
reviews strengthened efforts to
implement the standards.
Recommendations from reviews in
Colorado, Georgia, Maryland
and North Carolina are still to
come.
In 2014, South Carolina decided
to replace the Common Core.
Legislation requires the state
department of education to
develop new standards.
.
Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards
Interviewees articulated
these next steps for
states.
10|
Trends across the states
Next steps
Move forward with
assessments aligned to
new standards
Six states plan to use
assessments from one of the two
multistate assessment consortia.
PARCC tests: Colorado,
Louisiana (for grades three
through eight), Maryland and
Mississippi. Smarter Balanced
tests: Delaware and West
Virginia.
Nine states plan to use
assessments developed for them
or acquired from a vendor:
Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky,
Louisiana (for high school), New
York, North Carolina and
Pennsylvania.
South Carolina is engaged in a
test procurement process.
Tennessee plans to select new,
fully aligned tests for 2015-16.
States are working with local
school systems to address
technology capacity for testing,
which is a concern in some areas.
Some states plan to offer paper-
based versions of new tests for
the first few years.
.
Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness
Standards
Interviewees articulated
these next steps.
11|
Trends across the states
Next steps
Continue professional
development
Four years into the work of
leading implementation of their
new standards, state departments
of education and their key
partners must determine how to
carry their professional learning
initiatives forward ď‚ľ and whether
to develop new approaches to
foster long-term progress.
Several states plan to continue
current initiatives but scale back
the department’s work  by
moving to more online training
and tools, for example, or shifting
responsibility to district and school
leaders.
Some states plan to expand
current initiatives.
Strengthen teaching resources
Many of the state departments of
education posted large quantities
of new resources to their online
archives in 2014 and plan to
continue to build on offerings to
support local curriculum
development and strong
classroom instruction.
Improve public communication
Several states plan to do more to
help the public understand what
their new standards are, what
changes are needed, and how
students — as well as schools,
states and businesses — can
benefit.
.
Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards
Interviewees articulated these
next steps.
For more on states’ plans, see the
Professional Development report
in this series.
12|
Recommendations
Teaching resources
State departments of education
can continue to improve their
offerings to be sure they are:
Comprehensive: Offer sample
instructional plans that model
rigorous instruction for all of the
standards in all grades. Incorpor-
ate strategies for teaching English
learners, students with disabilities,
struggling learners and advanced
learners.
High quality and aligned
to standards: Use rigorous and
systematic methods and explicit
criteria to vet resources.
Widely used: Do more to be sure
educators know about the state’s
offerings.
Professional Learning
Many educators still need training
and support. State departments
should continue professional
learning and ongoing support for
all teachers and leader — and
should bolster local efforts.
Evaluation systems
States should update professional
standards, classroom observation
tools and rubrics for principals that
explicitly articulate the knowledge
and skills needed in a college- and
career-readiness environment.
Accountability measures
To provide a richer picture of local
practices and outcomes, state
accountability systems should
include multiple measures beyond
annual tests in English language
arts and math.
Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards
SREB encourages states
to continue to support
implementation of their
college- and career-
readiness standards and
the assessments aligned
to them.
Recommendations drawn from
SREB examinations of efforts in leading states.
13|
Recommendations .
Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards
SREB encourages states
to continue to support
implementation of their
college- and career-readiness
standards and the
assessments aligned
to them.
Recommendations based on what interviewees deemed important
to the long-term success of the reforms.
Commitment to policies, funding
Education leaders should work
with other leaders and with the
public to foster commitment to
policies and funding that support
educators over the long haul.
Data for improvement
States, districts and schools need
to analyze data more effectively to
identify what is working, what’s
not, and what can be improved.
.
State department capacity
State departments of education
can work together and with
external partners and funders to
build capacity to meet local
educators’ increased needs for
support. Interviewees identified
needs for more expertise in areas
such as change management,
psychometrics, statistics, research
and evaluation, teacher evaluation
and talent development.
14|
Methodology SREB examined efforts of state
departments of education to
support implementation of college-
and career-readiness standards,
assessments and related reforms.
Researchers looked at how states
provided guidance, tools and
support for teachers and for
school and district leaders.
SREB worked with a point person
in each of the 14 state
departments of education.
Timeframe
The SREB reports reflect state
efforts and plans between 2010
and summer 2014.
These January 2015 final reports
replace preliminary ones
published in March 2014.
A team of SREB researchers
and consultants gathered
information from:
Reviews of publicly available
information: Researchers
reviewed state policy documents
and reports, state department of
education websites and other
sources such as U.S. Department
of Education reports.
Interviews: Researchers
interviewed leaders from state
departments of education, state
boards of education, unions,
higher education and business
and community organizations, as
well as legislators’ and governors’
staff, teachers, principals and
district superintendents.
Each state department reviewed
drafts to ensure accuracy.
Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards
15|
Full reports
More information
Six detailed final reports were
published in January 2015. Slide
documents of report highlights,
like this one, are also available for
each report.
Cross-State Findings
Trends across the states, perspectives
from the field and suggestions for
moving forward
Details on each state's efforts in
five areas:
Timeline and Approach to
Standards and Assessments
Aligned Teaching Resources
Professional Development
Evaluation of Teachers
and Leaders
Accountability
Kim Anderson, Director
Benchmarking College- and
Career-Readiness Standards
404-875-9211
Kim.Anderson@SREB.org
Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards
Find all reports at SREB.org/1600 >
Southern Regional Education Board
592 10th St. N.W.
Atlanta, GA 30318-5776 SREB.org

More Related Content

What's hot

Achieve OER State Policy Recommendations
Achieve OER State Policy Recommendations Achieve OER State Policy Recommendations
Achieve OER State Policy Recommendations BCcampus
 
Autonomous District Schools: Lessons From the Field on a Promising Strategy
Autonomous District Schools: Lessons From the Field on a Promising StrategyAutonomous District Schools: Lessons From the Field on a Promising Strategy
Autonomous District Schools: Lessons From the Field on a Promising StrategyJeremy Knight
 
A Guide for School Districts: Exploring Alternative Measures of Student Learn...
A Guide for School Districts: Exploring Alternative Measures of Student Learn...A Guide for School Districts: Exploring Alternative Measures of Student Learn...
A Guide for School Districts: Exploring Alternative Measures of Student Learn...Tanya Paperny
 
California State_Levinar
California State_LevinarCalifornia State_Levinar
California State_LevinarSharonne Navas
 
Moving Toward Sustainability: Kansas City Teacher Residency
Moving Toward Sustainability: Kansas City Teacher ResidencyMoving Toward Sustainability: Kansas City Teacher Residency
Moving Toward Sustainability: Kansas City Teacher ResidencyJeremy Knight
 
Achieve Closing the Expectations Gap 2014
Achieve Closing the Expectations Gap 2014Achieve Closing the Expectations Gap 2014
Achieve Closing the Expectations Gap 2014Achieve, Inc.
 
Heath phillips ut ascd summit dec 15 2011 final
Heath phillips ut ascd summit dec 15 2011 finalHeath phillips ut ascd summit dec 15 2011 final
Heath phillips ut ascd summit dec 15 2011 finalJustin Reeve
 
Assessment and accountability during COVID-19
Assessment and accountability during COVID-19Assessment and accountability during COVID-19
Assessment and accountability during COVID-19Analisa Sorrells
 
Teacher evaluations-and-local-flexibility
Teacher evaluations-and-local-flexibilityTeacher evaluations-and-local-flexibility
Teacher evaluations-and-local-flexibilityDavid Black
 
Kansas Board of Regents_Foresight2020_2015 Progress Report
Kansas Board of Regents_Foresight2020_2015 Progress ReportKansas Board of Regents_Foresight2020_2015 Progress Report
Kansas Board of Regents_Foresight2020_2015 Progress ReportBreeze Richardson
 
Common Questions Answered
Common Questions Answered Common Questions Answered
Common Questions Answered MD Sias
 
Common Core Presentation Feb2010
Common Core Presentation Feb2010Common Core Presentation Feb2010
Common Core Presentation Feb2010Ruth Romi
 
LA Compact Full Doc
LA Compact Full DocLA Compact Full Doc
LA Compact Full DocDTLAJosh
 
The Quality Imperative: Match Ambitious Goals for College Attainment with an ...
The Quality Imperative: Match Ambitious Goals for College Attainment with an ...The Quality Imperative: Match Ambitious Goals for College Attainment with an ...
The Quality Imperative: Match Ambitious Goals for College Attainment with an ...Robert Kelly
 
UsingDualEnrollment_2015
UsingDualEnrollment_2015UsingDualEnrollment_2015
UsingDualEnrollment_2015Don Pitchford
 
Common Core vs TEKs
Common Core vs TEKsCommon Core vs TEKs
Common Core vs TEKsmmlee47
 
Verona prof dev presentation singleton elad 540
Verona prof dev presentation singleton elad 540Verona prof dev presentation singleton elad 540
Verona prof dev presentation singleton elad 540Tracey Singleton
 

What's hot (20)

Achieve OER State Policy Recommendations
Achieve OER State Policy Recommendations Achieve OER State Policy Recommendations
Achieve OER State Policy Recommendations
 
Autonomous District Schools: Lessons From the Field on a Promising Strategy
Autonomous District Schools: Lessons From the Field on a Promising StrategyAutonomous District Schools: Lessons From the Field on a Promising Strategy
Autonomous District Schools: Lessons From the Field on a Promising Strategy
 
Common core-e guide
Common core-e guideCommon core-e guide
Common core-e guide
 
A Guide for School Districts: Exploring Alternative Measures of Student Learn...
A Guide for School Districts: Exploring Alternative Measures of Student Learn...A Guide for School Districts: Exploring Alternative Measures of Student Learn...
A Guide for School Districts: Exploring Alternative Measures of Student Learn...
 
California State_Levinar
California State_LevinarCalifornia State_Levinar
California State_Levinar
 
Moving Toward Sustainability: Kansas City Teacher Residency
Moving Toward Sustainability: Kansas City Teacher ResidencyMoving Toward Sustainability: Kansas City Teacher Residency
Moving Toward Sustainability: Kansas City Teacher Residency
 
Achieve Closing the Expectations Gap 2014
Achieve Closing the Expectations Gap 2014Achieve Closing the Expectations Gap 2014
Achieve Closing the Expectations Gap 2014
 
Heath phillips ut ascd summit dec 15 2011 final
Heath phillips ut ascd summit dec 15 2011 finalHeath phillips ut ascd summit dec 15 2011 final
Heath phillips ut ascd summit dec 15 2011 final
 
Assessment and accountability during COVID-19
Assessment and accountability during COVID-19Assessment and accountability during COVID-19
Assessment and accountability during COVID-19
 
Teacher evaluations-and-local-flexibility
Teacher evaluations-and-local-flexibilityTeacher evaluations-and-local-flexibility
Teacher evaluations-and-local-flexibility
 
Kansas Board of Regents_Foresight2020_2015 Progress Report
Kansas Board of Regents_Foresight2020_2015 Progress ReportKansas Board of Regents_Foresight2020_2015 Progress Report
Kansas Board of Regents_Foresight2020_2015 Progress Report
 
F353848
F353848F353848
F353848
 
Common Questions Answered
Common Questions Answered Common Questions Answered
Common Questions Answered
 
Common Core Presentation Feb2010
Common Core Presentation Feb2010Common Core Presentation Feb2010
Common Core Presentation Feb2010
 
LA Compact Full Doc
LA Compact Full DocLA Compact Full Doc
LA Compact Full Doc
 
Resume.docx
Resume.docxResume.docx
Resume.docx
 
The Quality Imperative: Match Ambitious Goals for College Attainment with an ...
The Quality Imperative: Match Ambitious Goals for College Attainment with an ...The Quality Imperative: Match Ambitious Goals for College Attainment with an ...
The Quality Imperative: Match Ambitious Goals for College Attainment with an ...
 
UsingDualEnrollment_2015
UsingDualEnrollment_2015UsingDualEnrollment_2015
UsingDualEnrollment_2015
 
Common Core vs TEKs
Common Core vs TEKsCommon Core vs TEKs
Common Core vs TEKs
 
Verona prof dev presentation singleton elad 540
Verona prof dev presentation singleton elad 540Verona prof dev presentation singleton elad 540
Verona prof dev presentation singleton elad 540
 

Similar to Benchmarking perspectives recs

SINET_EdNexus_BeyondTeacherEvaluations_071614
SINET_EdNexus_BeyondTeacherEvaluations_071614SINET_EdNexus_BeyondTeacherEvaluations_071614
SINET_EdNexus_BeyondTeacherEvaluations_071614Kathleen T. Hayes, Ed.D.
 
Beyond Teacher Evaluation: Prioritizing Teacher Instructional Effectiveness w...
Beyond Teacher Evaluation: Prioritizing Teacher Instructional Effectiveness w...Beyond Teacher Evaluation: Prioritizing Teacher Instructional Effectiveness w...
Beyond Teacher Evaluation: Prioritizing Teacher Instructional Effectiveness w...School Improvement Network
 
Teacher Quality Is Defined By Reforms Fostered In Teacher Licensure And Certi...
Teacher Quality Is Defined By Reforms Fostered In Teacher Licensure And Certi...Teacher Quality Is Defined By Reforms Fostered In Teacher Licensure And Certi...
Teacher Quality Is Defined By Reforms Fostered In Teacher Licensure And Certi...noblex1
 
Competency report SBE
Competency report SBECompetency report SBE
Competency report SBEEducationNC
 
High-Stakes Testing
High-Stakes TestingHigh-Stakes Testing
High-Stakes TestingZenaida Halina
 
Leadership Webinar: A K-12 Policy Framework for Competency Education
Leadership Webinar: A K-12 Policy Framework for Competency EducationLeadership Webinar: A K-12 Policy Framework for Competency Education
Leadership Webinar: A K-12 Policy Framework for Competency EducationiNACOL
 
We Must Have Even Higher Expectations For Teachers
We Must Have Even Higher Expectations For TeachersWe Must Have Even Higher Expectations For Teachers
We Must Have Even Higher Expectations For Teachersnoblex1
 
teacher-evaluations-and-local-flexibility
teacher-evaluations-and-local-flexibilityteacher-evaluations-and-local-flexibility
teacher-evaluations-and-local-flexibilityKathleen T. Hayes, Ed.D.
 
1Running Head DATA GATHERINGS AND INTERVIEWS11DATA GATHER.docx
1Running Head DATA GATHERINGS AND INTERVIEWS11DATA GATHER.docx1Running Head DATA GATHERINGS AND INTERVIEWS11DATA GATHER.docx
1Running Head DATA GATHERINGS AND INTERVIEWS11DATA GATHER.docxdrennanmicah
 
Parent communications notes 4-07-13
Parent communications notes   4-07-13Parent communications notes   4-07-13
Parent communications notes 4-07-13Deon Lucke
 
Psf top teneducationissues_v5_web
Psf top teneducationissues_v5_webPsf top teneducationissues_v5_web
Psf top teneducationissues_v5_webKeith Eades
 
Condition National 2015
Condition National 2015Condition National 2015
Condition National 2015Will Valet
 
Nv Presentation Reynolds 5.2
Nv Presentation Reynolds 5.2Nv Presentation Reynolds 5.2
Nv Presentation Reynolds 5.2IPwebsite
 
Is Oregon Ready to Implement Competency Education?
Is Oregon Ready to Implement Competency Education?Is Oregon Ready to Implement Competency Education?
Is Oregon Ready to Implement Competency Education?Jesse Moyer
 
Pro questdocuments 2015-03-16(2)
Pro questdocuments 2015-03-16(2)Pro questdocuments 2015-03-16(2)
Pro questdocuments 2015-03-16(2)Rose Jedin
 
Pro questdocuments 2015-03-16(2)
Pro questdocuments 2015-03-16(2)Pro questdocuments 2015-03-16(2)
Pro questdocuments 2015-03-16(2)Rose Jedin
 
Standardized testing edf 2005
Standardized testing edf 2005Standardized testing edf 2005
Standardized testing edf 2005Alex Eicher
 

Similar to Benchmarking perspectives recs (20)

SINET_EdNexus_BeyondTeacherEvaluations_071614
SINET_EdNexus_BeyondTeacherEvaluations_071614SINET_EdNexus_BeyondTeacherEvaluations_071614
SINET_EdNexus_BeyondTeacherEvaluations_071614
 
Beyond Teacher Evaluation: Prioritizing Teacher Instructional Effectiveness w...
Beyond Teacher Evaluation: Prioritizing Teacher Instructional Effectiveness w...Beyond Teacher Evaluation: Prioritizing Teacher Instructional Effectiveness w...
Beyond Teacher Evaluation: Prioritizing Teacher Instructional Effectiveness w...
 
Teacher Quality Is Defined By Reforms Fostered In Teacher Licensure And Certi...
Teacher Quality Is Defined By Reforms Fostered In Teacher Licensure And Certi...Teacher Quality Is Defined By Reforms Fostered In Teacher Licensure And Certi...
Teacher Quality Is Defined By Reforms Fostered In Teacher Licensure And Certi...
 
Competency report SBE
Competency report SBECompetency report SBE
Competency report SBE
 
High-Stakes Testing
High-Stakes TestingHigh-Stakes Testing
High-Stakes Testing
 
Leadership Webinar: A K-12 Policy Framework for Competency Education
Leadership Webinar: A K-12 Policy Framework for Competency EducationLeadership Webinar: A K-12 Policy Framework for Competency Education
Leadership Webinar: A K-12 Policy Framework for Competency Education
 
We Must Have Even Higher Expectations For Teachers
We Must Have Even Higher Expectations For TeachersWe Must Have Even Higher Expectations For Teachers
We Must Have Even Higher Expectations For Teachers
 
teacher-evaluations-and-local-flexibility
teacher-evaluations-and-local-flexibilityteacher-evaluations-and-local-flexibility
teacher-evaluations-and-local-flexibility
 
1Running Head DATA GATHERINGS AND INTERVIEWS11DATA GATHER.docx
1Running Head DATA GATHERINGS AND INTERVIEWS11DATA GATHER.docx1Running Head DATA GATHERINGS AND INTERVIEWS11DATA GATHER.docx
1Running Head DATA GATHERINGS AND INTERVIEWS11DATA GATHER.docx
 
Sip manual
Sip manualSip manual
Sip manual
 
Parent communications notes 4-07-13
Parent communications notes   4-07-13Parent communications notes   4-07-13
Parent communications notes 4-07-13
 
Psf top teneducationissues_v5_web
Psf top teneducationissues_v5_webPsf top teneducationissues_v5_web
Psf top teneducationissues_v5_web
 
Condition National 2015
Condition National 2015Condition National 2015
Condition National 2015
 
Nv Presentation Reynolds 5.2
Nv Presentation Reynolds 5.2Nv Presentation Reynolds 5.2
Nv Presentation Reynolds 5.2
 
Assessment
AssessmentAssessment
Assessment
 
Ways and means 3 16-11 lw
Ways and means 3 16-11 lwWays and means 3 16-11 lw
Ways and means 3 16-11 lw
 
Is Oregon Ready to Implement Competency Education?
Is Oregon Ready to Implement Competency Education?Is Oregon Ready to Implement Competency Education?
Is Oregon Ready to Implement Competency Education?
 
Pro questdocuments 2015-03-16(2)
Pro questdocuments 2015-03-16(2)Pro questdocuments 2015-03-16(2)
Pro questdocuments 2015-03-16(2)
 
Pro questdocuments 2015-03-16(2)
Pro questdocuments 2015-03-16(2)Pro questdocuments 2015-03-16(2)
Pro questdocuments 2015-03-16(2)
 
Standardized testing edf 2005
Standardized testing edf 2005Standardized testing edf 2005
Standardized testing edf 2005
 

Recently uploaded

Biting mechanism of poisonous snakes.pdf
Biting mechanism of poisonous snakes.pdfBiting mechanism of poisonous snakes.pdf
Biting mechanism of poisonous snakes.pdfadityarao40181
 
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxHow to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxmanuelaromero2013
 
ESSENTIAL of (CS/IT/IS) class 06 (database)
ESSENTIAL of (CS/IT/IS) class 06 (database)ESSENTIAL of (CS/IT/IS) class 06 (database)
ESSENTIAL of (CS/IT/IS) class 06 (database)Dr. Mazin Mohamed alkathiri
 
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxProudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxthorishapillay1
 
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdfssuser54595a
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxNirmalaLoungPoorunde1
 
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17Celine George
 
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher EducationIntroduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Educationpboyjonauth
 
CELL CYCLE Division Science 8 quarter IV.pptx
CELL CYCLE Division Science 8 quarter IV.pptxCELL CYCLE Division Science 8 quarter IV.pptx
CELL CYCLE Division Science 8 quarter IV.pptxJiesonDelaCerna
 
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxCARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxGaneshChakor2
 
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdfFraming an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdfUjwalaBharambe
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTiammrhaywood
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxiammrhaywood
 
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon ACrayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon AUnboundStockton
 
KSHARA STURA .pptx---KSHARA KARMA THERAPY (CAUSTIC THERAPY)————IMP.OF KSHARA ...
KSHARA STURA .pptx---KSHARA KARMA THERAPY (CAUSTIC THERAPY)————IMP.OF KSHARA ...KSHARA STURA .pptx---KSHARA KARMA THERAPY (CAUSTIC THERAPY)————IMP.OF KSHARA ...
KSHARA STURA .pptx---KSHARA KARMA THERAPY (CAUSTIC THERAPY)————IMP.OF KSHARA ...M56BOOKSTORE PRODUCT/SERVICE
 
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course  for BeginnersFull Stack Web Development Course  for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course for BeginnersSabitha Banu
 
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptxSolving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptxOH TEIK BIN
 
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️9953056974 Low Rate Call Girls In Saket, Delhi NCR
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Biting mechanism of poisonous snakes.pdf
Biting mechanism of poisonous snakes.pdfBiting mechanism of poisonous snakes.pdf
Biting mechanism of poisonous snakes.pdf
 
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptxHow to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
How to Make a Pirate ship Primary Education.pptx
 
ESSENTIAL of (CS/IT/IS) class 06 (database)
ESSENTIAL of (CS/IT/IS) class 06 (database)ESSENTIAL of (CS/IT/IS) class 06 (database)
ESSENTIAL of (CS/IT/IS) class 06 (database)
 
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptxProudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
Proudly South Africa powerpoint Thorisha.pptx
 
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
18-04-UA_REPORT_MEDIALITERAСY_INDEX-DM_23-1-final-eng.pdf
 
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptxEmployee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
Employee wellbeing at the workplace.pptx
 
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
Incoming and Outgoing Shipments in 1 STEP Using Odoo 17
 
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher EducationIntroduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
Introduction to ArtificiaI Intelligence in Higher Education
 
CELL CYCLE Division Science 8 quarter IV.pptx
CELL CYCLE Division Science 8 quarter IV.pptxCELL CYCLE Division Science 8 quarter IV.pptx
CELL CYCLE Division Science 8 quarter IV.pptx
 
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptxCARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
CARE OF CHILD IN INCUBATOR..........pptx
 
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdfFraming an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
Framing an Appropriate Research Question 6b9b26d93da94caf993c038d9efcdedb.pdf
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPTECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - LONG FORM TV DRAMA - PPT
 
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptxECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
ECONOMIC CONTEXT - PAPER 1 Q3: NEWSPAPERS.pptx
 
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
Model Call Girl in Tilak Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝9953056974🔝
 
OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...
OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...
OS-operating systems- ch04 (Threads) ...
 
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon ACrayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
Crayon Activity Handout For the Crayon A
 
KSHARA STURA .pptx---KSHARA KARMA THERAPY (CAUSTIC THERAPY)————IMP.OF KSHARA ...
KSHARA STURA .pptx---KSHARA KARMA THERAPY (CAUSTIC THERAPY)————IMP.OF KSHARA ...KSHARA STURA .pptx---KSHARA KARMA THERAPY (CAUSTIC THERAPY)————IMP.OF KSHARA ...
KSHARA STURA .pptx---KSHARA KARMA THERAPY (CAUSTIC THERAPY)————IMP.OF KSHARA ...
 
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course  for BeginnersFull Stack Web Development Course  for Beginners
Full Stack Web Development Course for Beginners
 
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptxSolving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
Solving Puzzles Benefits Everyone (English).pptx
 
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
call girls in Kamla Market (DELHI) 🔝 >༒9953330565🔝 genuine Escort Service 🔝✔️✔️
 

Benchmarking perspectives recs

  • 1. Perspectives from the states Recommendations Highlights from findings of the SREB reports Benchmarking State Implementation of College- and Career-Readiness Standards, Aligned Assessments and Related Reforms January 2015
  • 2. 2| Contents Perspectives Recommendations What successes, challenges and next steps did interviewees articulate? What recommendations does SREB draw from the study? SREB researchers interviewed leaders from state departments of education, state boards of education, unions, higher education and business and community organizations, as well as legislators’ and governors’ staff, teachers, principals and district superintendents. page 12 Perspectives from the states Recommendations More about the study page 4 Successes, challenges, next steps Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards page 14 Participating states page 3
  • 3. 3| Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards Participating states Louisiana Maryland Mississippi North Carolina South Carolina Tennessee West Virginia Other regions Colorado New York Pennsylvania Florida participated in preliminary (March 2014) but not final reports. This SREB project supports states in the monumental task of implementing higher statewide standards by tracking progress and bringing states together to learn from and collaborate with one another. SREB region Alabama Delaware Georgia Kentucky Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards
  • 4. 4| Trends across the states Successes Comprehensive efforts All 14 state departments of education have undertaken comprehensive efforts to lead and support implementation of their state’s new college- and career- readiness standards, aligned assessments and related reforms. Interviewees appreciated how much their state departments of education have done to chart the course and provide local systems, schools, teachers and leaders the support and resources they need. Some state departments of education have expanded their roles in response to unprece- dented requests for support from the field, providing more kinds of support and resources than at any time in the past. Good reviews Interviewees gave good reviews of the standards and of states’ efforts. Teachers and principals, in particular, shared that the new standards are an improvement. Many noted that students have access to a more consistently high-quality education. Teachers reported that professional learning and teaching resources aligned to the standards have been extremely valuable in their daily practices and for their professional growth. Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards Interviewees in many roles cited these successes most commonly.
  • 5. 5| Trends across the states Successes Unprecedented collaboration Within states: State departments of education are collaborating with other leaders, educators and stakeholders. Department staff in many states reported that they have been working extensively with regional entities, districts, schools and teachers — more so than most could remember. State board of education members and governors’ staffs in some states reported that a key success has been involvement of the business sector and the community in building support. Among states: Departments have also partnered across states to enrich their work. The multi- state assessment consortia, particularly PARCC and Smarter Balanced, are the most visible of these partnerships. Among educators: Educators are also sharing instructional resources and materials, formally and informally. The tools interviewees cited sharing most often are materials on New York’s EngageNY website and resources from Achieve, Student Achievement Partners, the Council of Chief State School Officers, Literacy Design Collaborative and Mathematics Design Collaborative. Teachers expressed great appreciation for these resources. Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards Interviewees in many roles cited these successes most commonly.
  • 6. 6| Trends across the states Successes Collaboration with higher ed Interviewees praised partnerships between leaders in K-12 and higher education. This unprecedented collaboration builds a foundation for continued work to align policies and foster shared understandings of the knowledge and skills needed for success in K-12 classrooms, college courses, job training and careers. Supplemental funding Department of education staff reported that additional funding, such as grants from Race to the Top and private foundations, have been essential in bolstering their efforts. Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards Interviewees in many roles cited these successes most commonly.
  • 7. 7| Trends across the states Challenges Size of the effort Interviewees were realistic about the sea change in public education required by the readiness standards and related reforms. The work has just begun, and state departments of education have undertaken it with small staffs and tight budgets, making their efforts impressive — and fragile. Sustainability Large infusions of funding, such as Race to the Top grants and other external support, bolstered early initiatives in many states. As state departments of education prepare for the future, they must determine how to continue or modify their initiatives when the temporary funding ends. Integration of reforms Teachers, especially, highlighted the need for better integration of the new standards and assessments with other, concurrent state reforms such as new accountability systems and new teacher and leader evaluation systems. Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards Interviewees in many roles cited these challenges most commonly.
  • 8. 8| Trends across the states Challenges Uneven local implementation Teachers, principals and district superintendents reported that the readiness of teachers and local leaders to implement the new standards varies considerably across districts and even within schools. One contributing factor many interviewees noted is the variation in amount and quality of professional learning and implementation resources that reaches teachers and leaders. Educators gave high marks to the professional learning and other support their state departments have provided. But they said that these supports have not reached all who need it. Teachers still need more time, resources and support. Assessment technology While many districts and schools have the technology infrastructure and capacity to administer new computer-based assessments, many still do not. This is especially acute in small and rural districts. Communication Despite outreach and training from state departments of education, educators and the public still need to better understand the new readiness standards, how they differ from previous standards, and how the more rigorous demands are related to other changes. . Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards Interviewees in many roles cited these challenges most commonly.
  • 9. 9| Trends across the states Next steps Pressing ahead with standards Some states are launching initiatives to build on and support the standards they adopted and continue to implement. Delaware Governor Jack Markell helped launch the Partnership for Higher Standards. West Virginia joined the Improving Student Learning at Scale Policy Collaborative, a partnership of states and national organizations. Tennessee launched a STEM Leadership Council to provide guidance on STEM initiatives. 2013 legislation in West Virginia and Maryland requires further alignment of college- and career- readiness reforms across K-12 and higher education. Reviewing, changing standards Some states have taken another look at their new standards. Formal reviews of how six states adopted and implemented standards and assessments may bring changes. In Mississippi and New York, the reviews strengthened efforts to implement the standards. Recommendations from reviews in Colorado, Georgia, Maryland and North Carolina are still to come. In 2014, South Carolina decided to replace the Common Core. Legislation requires the state department of education to develop new standards. . Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards Interviewees articulated these next steps for states.
  • 10. 10| Trends across the states Next steps Move forward with assessments aligned to new standards Six states plan to use assessments from one of the two multistate assessment consortia. PARCC tests: Colorado, Louisiana (for grades three through eight), Maryland and Mississippi. Smarter Balanced tests: Delaware and West Virginia. Nine states plan to use assessments developed for them or acquired from a vendor: Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana (for high school), New York, North Carolina and Pennsylvania. South Carolina is engaged in a test procurement process. Tennessee plans to select new, fully aligned tests for 2015-16. States are working with local school systems to address technology capacity for testing, which is a concern in some areas. Some states plan to offer paper- based versions of new tests for the first few years. . Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards Interviewees articulated these next steps.
  • 11. 11| Trends across the states Next steps Continue professional development Four years into the work of leading implementation of their new standards, state departments of education and their key partners must determine how to carry their professional learning initiatives forward ď‚ľ and whether to develop new approaches to foster long-term progress. Several states plan to continue current initiatives but scale back the department’s work ď‚ľ by moving to more online training and tools, for example, or shifting responsibility to district and school leaders. Some states plan to expand current initiatives. Strengthen teaching resources Many of the state departments of education posted large quantities of new resources to their online archives in 2014 and plan to continue to build on offerings to support local curriculum development and strong classroom instruction. Improve public communication Several states plan to do more to help the public understand what their new standards are, what changes are needed, and how students — as well as schools, states and businesses — can benefit. . Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards Interviewees articulated these next steps. For more on states’ plans, see the Professional Development report in this series.
  • 12. 12| Recommendations Teaching resources State departments of education can continue to improve their offerings to be sure they are: Comprehensive: Offer sample instructional plans that model rigorous instruction for all of the standards in all grades. Incorpor- ate strategies for teaching English learners, students with disabilities, struggling learners and advanced learners. High quality and aligned to standards: Use rigorous and systematic methods and explicit criteria to vet resources. Widely used: Do more to be sure educators know about the state’s offerings. Professional Learning Many educators still need training and support. State departments should continue professional learning and ongoing support for all teachers and leader — and should bolster local efforts. Evaluation systems States should update professional standards, classroom observation tools and rubrics for principals that explicitly articulate the knowledge and skills needed in a college- and career-readiness environment. Accountability measures To provide a richer picture of local practices and outcomes, state accountability systems should include multiple measures beyond annual tests in English language arts and math. Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards SREB encourages states to continue to support implementation of their college- and career- readiness standards and the assessments aligned to them. Recommendations drawn from SREB examinations of efforts in leading states.
  • 13. 13| Recommendations . Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards SREB encourages states to continue to support implementation of their college- and career-readiness standards and the assessments aligned to them. Recommendations based on what interviewees deemed important to the long-term success of the reforms. Commitment to policies, funding Education leaders should work with other leaders and with the public to foster commitment to policies and funding that support educators over the long haul. Data for improvement States, districts and schools need to analyze data more effectively to identify what is working, what’s not, and what can be improved. . State department capacity State departments of education can work together and with external partners and funders to build capacity to meet local educators’ increased needs for support. Interviewees identified needs for more expertise in areas such as change management, psychometrics, statistics, research and evaluation, teacher evaluation and talent development.
  • 14. 14| Methodology SREB examined efforts of state departments of education to support implementation of college- and career-readiness standards, assessments and related reforms. Researchers looked at how states provided guidance, tools and support for teachers and for school and district leaders. SREB worked with a point person in each of the 14 state departments of education. Timeframe The SREB reports reflect state efforts and plans between 2010 and summer 2014. These January 2015 final reports replace preliminary ones published in March 2014. A team of SREB researchers and consultants gathered information from: Reviews of publicly available information: Researchers reviewed state policy documents and reports, state department of education websites and other sources such as U.S. Department of Education reports. Interviews: Researchers interviewed leaders from state departments of education, state boards of education, unions, higher education and business and community organizations, as well as legislators’ and governors’ staff, teachers, principals and district superintendents. Each state department reviewed drafts to ensure accuracy. Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards
  • 15. 15| Full reports More information Six detailed final reports were published in January 2015. Slide documents of report highlights, like this one, are also available for each report. Cross-State Findings Trends across the states, perspectives from the field and suggestions for moving forward Details on each state's efforts in five areas: Timeline and Approach to Standards and Assessments Aligned Teaching Resources Professional Development Evaluation of Teachers and Leaders Accountability Kim Anderson, Director Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards 404-875-9211 Kim.Anderson@SREB.org Perspectives and recommendations | Benchmarking College- and Career-Readiness Standards Find all reports at SREB.org/1600 >
  • 16. Southern Regional Education Board 592 10th St. N.W. Atlanta, GA 30318-5776 SREB.org