The presentation summarized the Oregon Department of Corrections' (DOC) planning process to address capacity needs due to measures 61 and 57. It outlined two options for measure 61 that reconfigured facilities for male and female inmates. It also noted risks such as challenges siting a new women's facility and potential delays and cost increases. Charts projected DOC's general fund debt service, bed increases, and new construction costs.

1. Presentation to the Financial Estimate Committee July 10, 2008 Director Max Williams Department of Corrections

2. DOC Planning Process Two-day summit in April 2008 Presentation by all institutions on capacity and resource options Examined DOC’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and risks Attendees from every division Department-wide collaboration to gather information Created nine workgroups and a dedicated project manager

3. DOC Ballot Measure 61 and 57 Workgroups Existing Capacity Options Capacity Alternatives Central Infrastructure Transition, Work, Education and Treatment Health Services (medical, mental health, dental, pharmacy) Inmate Habitability Intake, OISC (Sentence Computation and Records) and Assessment Stakeholder Management Communication

4. Option A for Measure 61 Option A: Keep Intake at Coffee Creek Correctional Facility (CCCF) and make Santiam Correctional Institution (SCI) a female facility. Option A Mobile medical/dental Modular units Infirmary beds (OSCI) Segregation beds – male and female SCI OISC OSCI Infirmary beds OSPM release issues DRCI: +432 m (6/11) PRCF: +270 m (6/11) JC: +1,804 m (10/11 min & 2/13 med) TRCI: +432 m (4/13) +1,600 women (11/13) WC: +2,000 m (4/14 & beyond) WC: +800 m (after 2017) DRCI: +1,227 2,156 temporary beds in existing facilities SCI: -440 -2,156 temp or rental beds CCCF: 108 existing, +400 temp beds, +60 new Seg. beds SCI: +440 Rentals: +800 New women’s facility: +1,600 beds (-1,200 temp beds) Infrastructure Facility Upgrade New Capacity Options Male Female

5. Option B for Measure 61 Option B: Move Intake to Oregon State Correctional Institution (OSCI) and use the Intake beds as female beds. Option B Mobile medical/dental Modular units Infirmary beds (OSCI) Segregation beds – male and female SCI OISC OSCI Infirmary beds, remodel for Intake OSPM release issues DRCI: +432 m (6/11) PRCF: +270 m (6/11) JC: +1,804 m (10/11 min & 2/13 med) TRCI: +432 m (10/11) +1,600 women (starts 3/13) WC: +2,000 m (4/14) WC: +800 m (2017) DRCI: +1,227 2,156 temporary beds in existing facilities SCI: -440 CCCF Intake: -432 Rentals: +400 -2,156 temp beds and -400 rental beds CCCF: 108 existing, +400 temp beds, +60 new Seg. beds SCI: +440 CCCF Intake: +432 Rentals: +400 New women’s facility: +1,600 beds (-800 temp & rental beds) Infrastructure Facility Upgrade New Capacity Options Male Female

6. Measure 57 Option

7. Risks of Possible Options Challenge of siting a new women’s facility Insufficient rental beds and prohibitive cost Existing siting conditions and agreements at current facilities Ability to advance the building timeline at Junction City and White City Unanticipated construction delays and cost increases

8. Risks of Possible Options Access to sufficient labor pool Inability for DPSST to meet statutory training obligation Increased legal challenges to 8 th Amendment related issues Inmate habitability issues/operations- safety and security Legislative approval process

9. Oregon Department of Corrections General Fund Debt Service Projection

10. Oregon Department of Corrections Projected Bed Increase

11. Oregon Department of Corrections New Construction Costs Projections