U.S. policymakers have long struggled to balance national security and civil liberties. Prior to 9/11, government agencies could access private records with simple requests, citing national security. After 9/11, these rules were further eased through laws like the USA Patriot Act, allowing entire database access without explanation to investigate terrorists and prevent attacks. While supporters believe this protects Americans, critics argue it infringes too much on civil liberties.

1. Balancing National Security and Civil Liberties
U.S. policy makers have struggled to strike a balance between
national security and civil liberties long before September 11th.
However, the tragedy that occurred on 9/11 brought the debate
front and center. Prior to 9/11, government agencies accessed
individuals' private records. The FBI, citing national security
concerns, gained access to private records with a simple letter
requesting phone companies or banks for the account
information of any suspected individual.
Since 9/11, the rules regarding accessing information have been
further eased with national security at stake. With the
implementation of the USA Patriot Act, the U.S. government
can now request access to entire databases without explanation.
The overriding rationale is to give the government the ability to
investigate and search for terrorist suspects and thus prevent
future terrorist attacks. Today, national security agencies
actively compare the activities of millions with terrorist
profiling data from databases in its possession. Supporters of
the USA Patriot Act and similar legislation believe that actions
are justified to protect the lives of Americans. Critics argue that
these actions infringe too much on civil liberties.
To prepare for this Discussion:
Review Chapter 7 of your course text
Introduction to Homeland Security
. Reflect on the balance between security and freedom.

2. Review the article "National Security versus Civil Liberties."
Focus on how the U.S. government controls information post-
9/11. Also, examine the author's arguments concerning post-
9/11 restrictions on civil liberties, limited rights to due process,
and the issue of privacy and government surveillance.
Review Chapters 4 and 5 from the video "Spying on the Home
Front." Think about whether the use of private database
information is necessary to protect homeland security.
Reflect on your position on the proper balance between security
and civil liberties.
Think about what trade-offs you feel are acceptable and are not
acceptable to protect national security.
With these thoughts in mind:
Post by Day 4
your position on the proper balance between security and civil
liberties. Include an explanation of what trade-offs might be
involved. Justify your position and use specific examples.