Presentation on the probable disparate impact of judicial records systems on the rental housing opportunities of African-American women with children. Given at 2011 Access to Justice Conference in Kennewick, Wash.
Discriminatory Use of Criminal & Eviction Records in Rental ApplicationsEGDunn
The document discusses how denying rental housing applications based on criminal or eviction records can disproportionately impact protected classes like people of color and women. While safety and financial responsibility are legitimate concerns for landlords, simply rejecting applicants with any criminal or eviction history may not be justified and could violate fair housing laws by having an unjustified disparate impact. The document argues landlords must consider individual circumstances of an applicant's criminal or eviction history on a case-by-case basis to avoid unfairly discriminating against protected groups.
Defendants dismas charties. inc.. ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Cocoselul Inaripat
1) The defendants filed a notice of proposed mediation order with the court to schedule mediation for the case of Traian Bujduveanu v. Dismas Charities, Inc. et al.
2) The proposed mediation order schedules mediation for November 1, 2011 at 10:30am at the offices of Lance Wogalter, P.A. in Boca Raton, Florida.
3) The order requires all plaintiffs and defendants to attend and mediate the matters in dispute.
1) The defendants filed a notice of proposed mediation order with the court to schedule mediation for the case of Traian Bujduveanu v. Dismas Charities, Inc. et al.
2) The proposed mediation order schedules mediation for November 1, 2011 at 10:30am at the offices of Lance Wogalter, P.A. in Boca Raton, Florida.
3) The order requires all plaintiff and defendants to appear for court ordered mediation on that date to mediate the matters in this case.
This document is a notice of filing a proposed mediation order in a case between plaintiff Traian Bujduveanu and defendants Dismas Charities Inc., Ana Gispert, Derek Thomas, and Adams Lashanda. It notifies the court that the defendants have filed a proposed order setting mediation for this case on November 1, 2011 at 10:30am at the offices of Lance Wogalter, P.A. in Boca Raton, Florida. The proposed order is attached.
Witches Brew
Branding women as dayans across tribal belts in India is on the rise as greed for property, enmity and collusion by local officials overturns legal and ethical norms, aided by illiteracy and superstition
Youth who were transferred to adult court perceived their last court experience as more procedurally just than youth who remained in juvenile court, especially in their treatment by defense attorneys. This contrasts the hypothesis that juvenile court would be viewed as more just due to its focus on youth welfare. Differences in perceptions existed even when controlling for criminal history and demographics. The authors suggest juvenile defense attorneys may struggle balancing client advocacy with client needs. Further research is needed on how attorney behaviors impact fairness perceptions and whether youth understand procedural differences between court systems.
1) Wilson Construction Company claims that Carrigan Brick and Masonry breached their construction contract by failing to complete certain masonry work. Carrigan defends by saying they did not have adequate site access.
2) Wilson is considering mediation or arbitration instead of litigation but is worried justice may not be served. The document asks if his concerns are justified and discusses the pros and cons of alternative dispute resolution versus litigation.
3) It discusses a hypothetical proposal by a trial court administrator to require binding arbitration for civil cases under $10,000 to reduce the court's caseload and save money for taxpayers. It asks if this proposal would be legal and ethical.
The letter requests Vice President Biden's assistance on nuclear safety issues that the writer has been attempting to raise for decades. It provides extensive background documents on alleged cover-ups and ignored safety concerns regarding counterfeit and substandard parts in nuclear plants. The writer founded a whistleblower organization and has contacted multiple government officials and agencies about these issues but received no response or action. He is seeking Vice President Biden's intervention to get President Obama to meet with the writer and address the unanswered safety concerns raised.
Discriminatory Use of Criminal & Eviction Records in Rental ApplicationsEGDunn
The document discusses how denying rental housing applications based on criminal or eviction records can disproportionately impact protected classes like people of color and women. While safety and financial responsibility are legitimate concerns for landlords, simply rejecting applicants with any criminal or eviction history may not be justified and could violate fair housing laws by having an unjustified disparate impact. The document argues landlords must consider individual circumstances of an applicant's criminal or eviction history on a case-by-case basis to avoid unfairly discriminating against protected groups.
Defendants dismas charties. inc.. ana gispert, derek thomas and adams leshota...Cocoselul Inaripat
1) The defendants filed a notice of proposed mediation order with the court to schedule mediation for the case of Traian Bujduveanu v. Dismas Charities, Inc. et al.
2) The proposed mediation order schedules mediation for November 1, 2011 at 10:30am at the offices of Lance Wogalter, P.A. in Boca Raton, Florida.
3) The order requires all plaintiffs and defendants to attend and mediate the matters in dispute.
1) The defendants filed a notice of proposed mediation order with the court to schedule mediation for the case of Traian Bujduveanu v. Dismas Charities, Inc. et al.
2) The proposed mediation order schedules mediation for November 1, 2011 at 10:30am at the offices of Lance Wogalter, P.A. in Boca Raton, Florida.
3) The order requires all plaintiff and defendants to appear for court ordered mediation on that date to mediate the matters in this case.
This document is a notice of filing a proposed mediation order in a case between plaintiff Traian Bujduveanu and defendants Dismas Charities Inc., Ana Gispert, Derek Thomas, and Adams Lashanda. It notifies the court that the defendants have filed a proposed order setting mediation for this case on November 1, 2011 at 10:30am at the offices of Lance Wogalter, P.A. in Boca Raton, Florida. The proposed order is attached.
Witches Brew
Branding women as dayans across tribal belts in India is on the rise as greed for property, enmity and collusion by local officials overturns legal and ethical norms, aided by illiteracy and superstition
Youth who were transferred to adult court perceived their last court experience as more procedurally just than youth who remained in juvenile court, especially in their treatment by defense attorneys. This contrasts the hypothesis that juvenile court would be viewed as more just due to its focus on youth welfare. Differences in perceptions existed even when controlling for criminal history and demographics. The authors suggest juvenile defense attorneys may struggle balancing client advocacy with client needs. Further research is needed on how attorney behaviors impact fairness perceptions and whether youth understand procedural differences between court systems.
1) Wilson Construction Company claims that Carrigan Brick and Masonry breached their construction contract by failing to complete certain masonry work. Carrigan defends by saying they did not have adequate site access.
2) Wilson is considering mediation or arbitration instead of litigation but is worried justice may not be served. The document asks if his concerns are justified and discusses the pros and cons of alternative dispute resolution versus litigation.
3) It discusses a hypothetical proposal by a trial court administrator to require binding arbitration for civil cases under $10,000 to reduce the court's caseload and save money for taxpayers. It asks if this proposal would be legal and ethical.
The letter requests Vice President Biden's assistance on nuclear safety issues that the writer has been attempting to raise for decades. It provides extensive background documents on alleged cover-ups and ignored safety concerns regarding counterfeit and substandard parts in nuclear plants. The writer founded a whistleblower organization and has contacted multiple government officials and agencies about these issues but received no response or action. He is seeking Vice President Biden's intervention to get President Obama to meet with the writer and address the unanswered safety concerns raised.
A primer on the complex issues surrounding immigration consequences of criminal convictions. VERY important for attorneys in order to avoid charges of ineffective assistance of counsel! This was presented as a CLE for the Criminal Section of the Minnesota Bar Association.
Our office provides opinion letters to attorneys to keep their criminal practice from becoming malpractice.
Thanks for reading!
Chaudhary Law Office, PLLC
Minneapolis, Minnesota Immigration Attorneys Lawyers
5010 Flour Exchange Building
310 Fourth Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55415
(612) 206-3721
satveer@chaudharylawoffice.com
Jason Beehler presented "Social Media Evidence" at the National Business Institute's "How to Get Your Social Media, Email and Text Evidence Admitted (and Keep Theirs Out)" seminar on October 29, 2015, in Worthington, Ohio.
Mike Moloney and Scott Davies discuss aspects of Probate Litigation, including creditor claims, will contests, disputes over inventory and disputes over guardianship of minors, as well as suggestions regarding how to reduce Probate Litigation through planning, use of trusts and mediation.
Limits on Zealous Advocacy: Respecting the Rights of OthersQuarles & Brady
In this ethics continuing legal education program, we used two real-world case studies to discuss a lawyer's obligation to parties other than his or her client. We explored potentially uncomfortable situations that a lawyer may face and possible consequences of violating the rules of professional conduct.
This document is a court docket listing entries related to a civil case filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The docket indicates that plaintiff Traian Bujduveanu filed a motion for return of property against defendants. The docket outlines subsequent filings including an amended complaint, motions for appointment of counsel, issuance of summons to defendants, and a motion to dismiss filed by the defendants. The docket provides procedural information on the case and identifies documents filed and orders/deadlines issued by the court.
Greg Wright was convicted and sentenced to death for the 1997 murder of Donna Vick in Texas. He claimed innocence, arguing his court-appointed attorneys provided ineffective defense. John Adams initially confessed to the crime but later implicated Wright. Supporters argue Wright's innocence is supported by Adams' written confession exonerating Wright and flaws in evidence. Wright was executed in 2008 despite ongoing claims of innocence. The document discusses the morality of capital punishment and euthanasia by considering whether humans have the right to end others' lives.
This chapter discusses business law topics including distinguishing between crimes and torts, the elements of a tort, and when a person can be held responsible for another's tort. It outlines common intentional torts such as assault, battery, and defamation. The chapter also defines negligence, strict liability, and discusses what damages are available in tort cases and the process for a civil trial and collecting a judgment.
The document summarizes a counseling session between Assistant Chief Immigration Judge Gary Smith and Judge Jesus Clemente of the York Immigration Court regarding two issues. Smith discussed comments Judge Clemente made in an oral decision that could be perceived as stereotyping and advised him to choose his words carefully. Smith also advised Judge Clemente to issue oral decisions rather than just minute orders for cases involving aggravated felonies. Judge Clemente agreed to be more cautious with his comments and to start issuing full oral decisions.
Lawsuit against WCSD alleges breach of contract, lying to courtThis Is Reno
The Washoe County School District was hit again with another lawsuit from a former employee. The suit, filed Friday, alleges that the District’s attorney lied to a judge and violated the Nevada Public Records Act. It also claims that administrators conspired to oust former Superintendent Traci Davis and fired an administrator in violation of a settlement agreement.
This document provides summaries of various civil lawsuits filed in Maryland courts between March 30 and April 1, 2011. Key cases include:
1. Employment discrimination lawsuits filed against Hard Rock Cafe and East Coast Equipment Service by employees alleging discrimination based on race, sex and wage/overtime violations.
2. A securities lawsuit filed against Medifast Inc. alleging the company failed to disclose material information that caused stock prices to decline 24%.
3. Negligence lawsuits filed regarding a death from contact with overhead power lines and trip and fall accidents seeking damages up to $3 million.
The document discusses a man who takes late night walks with his small dog, Jake, in his urban neighborhood. While Jake seems alert to potential dangers, the man fears the dog could be eaten by a coyotes, which have begun wandering into more residential areas. The document provides context that coyote sightings have become more common in nearby cities and parks.
Jack Weil proposes handling a complaint against Immigration Judge DeVitto by issuing a letter finding that the original dismissal of the complaint was proper, despite intervening events in the related case. Michael McGoings has the complaint file and is ready to proceed but requested time to review the matter. Weil asks Mary Beth Keller to call if she wishes to discuss or has any questions.
This document discusses barriers to obtaining rental housing due to tenant screening practices. It notes that tenant screening reports often contain inaccuracies and improper information that can unjustly deny applicants housing. Blanket exclusions of applicants with criminal or eviction histories can have a disparate discriminatory impact and may violate fair housing law if not justified by business necessity. The document advocates addressing these issues through legislation limiting screening costs, requiring disclosure of screening criteria, and prohibiting exclusions based on dismissed records.
Bob, the proprietor of a market, refused to allow two African American teenage boys, Tony and Pete, into his store. When Tony protested, Bob pointed to a sign that said "We refuse the right to refuse service to anyone!!" and said "No gang-banging in my store." Tony and Pete believe Bob violated their civil rights. Bob claims he did not discriminate based on race, but refused service because Tony and Pete looked like gang members based on how they talked and dressed. A court would have to evaluate whether Bob's reason for refusing service was a pretext for unlawful discrimination.
This document provides a summary of legal issues related to home ownership and foreclosure. It discusses the home purchasing process, types of real estate contracts, roles of real estate agents, types of financing and loans, foreclosure procedures, foreclosure rescue scams, predatory lending practices, and reverse mortgages. Key points covered include purchase and sale agreements, deeds of trust, trustee sales, borrower rights, foreclosure timelines, and laws governing lenders, brokers, and servicers.
The document discusses the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and outlines who it pertains to including consumer reporting agencies, users of consumer reports, and furnishers of consumer information. It explains what consumer reports are, the dispute process consumers can initiate, and remedies available for violations of the FCRA.
A primer on the complex issues surrounding immigration consequences of criminal convictions. VERY important for attorneys in order to avoid charges of ineffective assistance of counsel! This was presented as a CLE for the Criminal Section of the Minnesota Bar Association.
Our office provides opinion letters to attorneys to keep their criminal practice from becoming malpractice.
Thanks for reading!
Chaudhary Law Office, PLLC
Minneapolis, Minnesota Immigration Attorneys Lawyers
5010 Flour Exchange Building
310 Fourth Avenue South
Minneapolis, MN 55415
(612) 206-3721
satveer@chaudharylawoffice.com
Jason Beehler presented "Social Media Evidence" at the National Business Institute's "How to Get Your Social Media, Email and Text Evidence Admitted (and Keep Theirs Out)" seminar on October 29, 2015, in Worthington, Ohio.
Mike Moloney and Scott Davies discuss aspects of Probate Litigation, including creditor claims, will contests, disputes over inventory and disputes over guardianship of minors, as well as suggestions regarding how to reduce Probate Litigation through planning, use of trusts and mediation.
Limits on Zealous Advocacy: Respecting the Rights of OthersQuarles & Brady
In this ethics continuing legal education program, we used two real-world case studies to discuss a lawyer's obligation to parties other than his or her client. We explored potentially uncomfortable situations that a lawyer may face and possible consequences of violating the rules of professional conduct.
This document is a court docket listing entries related to a civil case filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The docket indicates that plaintiff Traian Bujduveanu filed a motion for return of property against defendants. The docket outlines subsequent filings including an amended complaint, motions for appointment of counsel, issuance of summons to defendants, and a motion to dismiss filed by the defendants. The docket provides procedural information on the case and identifies documents filed and orders/deadlines issued by the court.
Greg Wright was convicted and sentenced to death for the 1997 murder of Donna Vick in Texas. He claimed innocence, arguing his court-appointed attorneys provided ineffective defense. John Adams initially confessed to the crime but later implicated Wright. Supporters argue Wright's innocence is supported by Adams' written confession exonerating Wright and flaws in evidence. Wright was executed in 2008 despite ongoing claims of innocence. The document discusses the morality of capital punishment and euthanasia by considering whether humans have the right to end others' lives.
This chapter discusses business law topics including distinguishing between crimes and torts, the elements of a tort, and when a person can be held responsible for another's tort. It outlines common intentional torts such as assault, battery, and defamation. The chapter also defines negligence, strict liability, and discusses what damages are available in tort cases and the process for a civil trial and collecting a judgment.
The document summarizes a counseling session between Assistant Chief Immigration Judge Gary Smith and Judge Jesus Clemente of the York Immigration Court regarding two issues. Smith discussed comments Judge Clemente made in an oral decision that could be perceived as stereotyping and advised him to choose his words carefully. Smith also advised Judge Clemente to issue oral decisions rather than just minute orders for cases involving aggravated felonies. Judge Clemente agreed to be more cautious with his comments and to start issuing full oral decisions.
Lawsuit against WCSD alleges breach of contract, lying to courtThis Is Reno
The Washoe County School District was hit again with another lawsuit from a former employee. The suit, filed Friday, alleges that the District’s attorney lied to a judge and violated the Nevada Public Records Act. It also claims that administrators conspired to oust former Superintendent Traci Davis and fired an administrator in violation of a settlement agreement.
This document provides summaries of various civil lawsuits filed in Maryland courts between March 30 and April 1, 2011. Key cases include:
1. Employment discrimination lawsuits filed against Hard Rock Cafe and East Coast Equipment Service by employees alleging discrimination based on race, sex and wage/overtime violations.
2. A securities lawsuit filed against Medifast Inc. alleging the company failed to disclose material information that caused stock prices to decline 24%.
3. Negligence lawsuits filed regarding a death from contact with overhead power lines and trip and fall accidents seeking damages up to $3 million.
The document discusses a man who takes late night walks with his small dog, Jake, in his urban neighborhood. While Jake seems alert to potential dangers, the man fears the dog could be eaten by a coyotes, which have begun wandering into more residential areas. The document provides context that coyote sightings have become more common in nearby cities and parks.
Jack Weil proposes handling a complaint against Immigration Judge DeVitto by issuing a letter finding that the original dismissal of the complaint was proper, despite intervening events in the related case. Michael McGoings has the complaint file and is ready to proceed but requested time to review the matter. Weil asks Mary Beth Keller to call if she wishes to discuss or has any questions.
This document discusses barriers to obtaining rental housing due to tenant screening practices. It notes that tenant screening reports often contain inaccuracies and improper information that can unjustly deny applicants housing. Blanket exclusions of applicants with criminal or eviction histories can have a disparate discriminatory impact and may violate fair housing law if not justified by business necessity. The document advocates addressing these issues through legislation limiting screening costs, requiring disclosure of screening criteria, and prohibiting exclusions based on dismissed records.
Bob, the proprietor of a market, refused to allow two African American teenage boys, Tony and Pete, into his store. When Tony protested, Bob pointed to a sign that said "We refuse the right to refuse service to anyone!!" and said "No gang-banging in my store." Tony and Pete believe Bob violated their civil rights. Bob claims he did not discriminate based on race, but refused service because Tony and Pete looked like gang members based on how they talked and dressed. A court would have to evaluate whether Bob's reason for refusing service was a pretext for unlawful discrimination.
This document provides a summary of legal issues related to home ownership and foreclosure. It discusses the home purchasing process, types of real estate contracts, roles of real estate agents, types of financing and loans, foreclosure procedures, foreclosure rescue scams, predatory lending practices, and reverse mortgages. Key points covered include purchase and sale agreements, deeds of trust, trustee sales, borrower rights, foreclosure timelines, and laws governing lenders, brokers, and servicers.
The document discusses the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) and outlines who it pertains to including consumer reporting agencies, users of consumer reports, and furnishers of consumer information. It explains what consumer reports are, the dispute process consumers can initiate, and remedies available for violations of the FCRA.
Presentation on public records used for tenant-screening purposes; given to the Judiciary Committee of the Washington House of Representatives in June 2010
HUD’s New Guidelines on Tenant Screening and Criminal Background ChecksMichael Brant
The document summarizes HUD's new guidelines on tenant screening and criminal background checks, which state that blanket policies barring individuals with criminal records from housing can disproportionately impact racial minorities and violate fair housing laws, unless the policy is justified by legitimate safety concerns and no less discriminatory alternatives exist. Landlords are advised to conduct individualized assessments that consider the facts of convictions and evidence of rehabilitation.
Intro to u.s. law prof. betsy candlersummer 2018class ssuser47f0be
This document provides an overview of an introductory law class covering individual rights and equal protection and fundamental rights under U.S. law. It summarizes 7 key Supreme Court cases related to marriage, same-sex relationships, and discrimination. It also reviews different standards of legal review including rational basis review, intermediate scrutiny, and strict scrutiny applied under equal protection and substantive due process analyses. The class will examine these standards and their application in cases related to marriage, privacy, sexual orientation, race, gender, and other classifications.
This document summarizes recent developments and cases related to state employment law. It discusses a new Domestic Workers Bill of Rights in New York, a proposed anti-workplace bullying statute, a case finding that calling one's boss a "slimebag" did not breach a non-disparagement clause, and a case preventing the recovery of damages for humiliation or injury to feelings in a non-disparagement breach of contract case. It also summarizes cases related to forum selection clauses, social media background checks under the FCRA, discovery of social media content, and more.
This document summarizes issues related to domestic restraining orders. It discusses how restraining orders are obtained through a two-step process and are often issued on an emergency basis without the respondent being present. It estimates that around 60% of the millions of restraining orders issued annually are unnecessary or false. The document also discusses how restraining orders can negatively impact families and violate due process, as well as problems with gender bias in their issuance and victims sometimes being wrongly accused of abuse.
This is a presentation given in New York City on October 26, 2011 as part of a seminar titled "How Legal and IT Can Work Together to Avoid an E-Discovery Crisis. The presentation covered the legal aspects of the duty to preserve and the pitfalls that can happen when relevant evidence, including electronically stored information, is not preserved
The Illinois Department of Human Rights (IDHR) enforces laws against housing discrimination in Illinois. IDHR investigates complaints of housing discrimination based on protected classes such as race, disability, familial status, and others. Housing discrimination continues to be a problem and takes many forms such as unequal treatment, discriminatory advertising, and perpetuation of segregation. To report housing discrimination, people should document any issues, report possible violations to enforcement agencies, and be aware of their rights and responsibilities under fair housing laws.
This document summarizes a court case regarding a same-sex couple challenging California's Proposition 8, which banned same-sex marriage. The court granted California's motion to dismiss, finding that the plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge Proposition 8. Specifically, the court found that the plaintiffs did not demonstrate a concrete and particularized injury, or that their injury could be redressed by a favorable court decision, which are both requirements for standing. This was the second time the plaintiffs had brought similar challenges to the court regarding same-sex marriage bans.
This document summarizes a qualitative research report on Aboriginal over-incarceration in Canada. The report explores interviews conducted with 10 Aboriginal men and women in federal prisons in Alberta. The interviews found that Aboriginal people felt marginalized by the criminal justice system, many were unhappy with their legal defense, and Gladue Reports aimed at reducing over-incarceration were rarely used. The literature review discusses how, despite measures to reduce it, Aboriginal over-incarceration continues to rise in Canada. Factors like poverty, lack of opportunities, substance abuse, and cultural divides contribute to higher crime rates and incarceration among Aboriginal populations. Ensuring proper legal representation and understanding of Aboriginal experiences and cultures is important to addressing over-
This document summarizes a qualitative research study that explored the experiences of Aboriginal men and women in the Canadian criminal justice system. In-depth interviews were conducted with 5 Aboriginal men and 5 Aboriginal women serving sentences between 2.5 to 20 years. The findings indicated that the participants felt marginalized by the system and many were unhappy with their legal defense counsel. Specifically, Gladue Reports were rarely used and many participants felt pressured into pleading guilty rather than fighting their case. The study highlights issues with representation of Aboriginal people in the criminal justice system and over-incarceration of Aboriginal populations in Canada.
This document is a certification form for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, or stalking seeking protection under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). The form can be submitted to a housing provider within 14 days of a written request for documentation of abuse. It requests information such as the victim and perpetrator's names and relationship, date and description of the incident(s), and certification that the information provided is true. All information will be kept confidential and only disclosed as required by law or with written consent.
The document provides an overview of fair housing laws and guidelines for property managers to avoid discrimination. It defines protected classes under federal and sometimes state/local laws, including race, color, religion, sex, familial status, national origin, and disability status. It discusses types of discrimination like refusal to rent, linguistic profiling, and steering. It also covers accommodation requirements, harassment, advertising standards, and ensuring consistent application of policies.
This document outlines context and issues related to non-marital agreements for both opposite-sex and same-sex couples. It discusses demographic data on the LGBT population nationally and in Florida. It provides an overview of key considerations for non-marital agreements, including financial disclosures, property division, support, termination, and defenses. It also summarizes the legal landscape surrounding same-sex marriage before and after the Obergefell decision.
Learning Unit 6 -Judicial Role in D. V. CRJ 461Bonnie Black
This document discusses the judicial role in domestic violence cases, including issuing protective orders, sentencing abusers, and making decisions around visitation and custody. It outlines the goals of judicial intervention as stopping the violence, protecting victims and children, holding abusers accountable, and conveying that domestic violence will not be tolerated. Judges aim to promote victim safety, ensure abuser accountability through sentencing and probation, and consider victim safety in visitation and custody decisions, often requiring supervised visitation initially. The role of protective orders and injunctions against harassment is also summarized.
The document is a letter from the president of the FACDL-Miami chapter informing members about obtaining a security bypass ID card for the courthouse. It provides an application form for new and renewal applicants, which requires basic information and a $20 fee. Completed applications should be mailed to the FACDL-Miami secretary. Applications will be submitted to the AOC on the 15th of each month and IDs can then be picked up with an acknowledgement form affirming the user will follow program rules. The letter encourages members to renew their membership and forward the information to other interested parties.
The document discusses how the Uniform Adult Guardianship and Protective Proceedings Jurisdiction Act (UAGPPJA) establishes standards for determining jurisdiction over guardianship cases involving individuals in multiple states, such as defining the "home state" as the state where the individual lived for the past 6 months and outlining procedures for communicating between courts and transferring guardianships between states. It also provides two examples of how the UAGPPJA could have helped resolve complex jurisdictional issues over individuals in guardianship cases that spanned multiple states.
The document discusses jury nullification and whether ethnicity influences courtroom proceedings. It provides background on two issues regarding race and the criminal justice system: that minorities receive harsher sentences than whites, and dissatisfaction with public defender services and plea bargaining. The document also discusses a case where three teens were acquitted of serious charges in the beating death of a Mexican immigrant, which elicited cheers. Scholars are discussed who view ethnicity-based jury nullification as either a way to vote against injustice or as a danger to society.
Vice crimes refer to offenses against public morality such as prostitution, gambling, and drug and alcohol offenses. The document provides an overview of various vice crimes including their historical development and current legal status. It summarizes laws around issues like obscenity, public intoxication, controlled substances, and drug courts as alternatives to incarceration for nonviolent drug offenders.
Seven Haitian asylum seekers ("Doe Plaintiffs") sought to proceed anonymously in their lawsuit against the U.S. government regarding asylum policies for Haitians. The court granted their request, finding that revealing their identities could endanger them and their families due to threats and violence they faced in Haiti. While open proceedings are important, the Doe Plaintiffs' privacy interests outweighed disclosure risks given threats of physical harm and the sensitivity of information involved. Allowing anonymity would not prejudice the government's defense.
12. Does the denial of housing to applicants with criminal or eviction records cause a disparate impact on members of any protected class?
13.
14. Is the denial of rental housing to applicants with criminal records justified by a compelling business necessity?
15.
16.
17. After 5 Years, Offenders No More Likely Than Non-Offenders to Be Re-Arrested (Kurlychek, et al. “Scarlet Letters & Recidivism: Does An Old Criminal Record Predict Future Criminal Behavior?,” 2006)
Though, intent may be inferred from landlord’s unwillingness to use less-discriminatory alternative
Small claims suits (security deposits), fair housing claims, DVPOs, personal injury suits
A person who has committed a criminal offense in the past may be more likely to commit a criminal offense in the future
Focus on facts of the crime, not its legal classification (felony/misdemeanor, degree, charge, etc.)
Applicant’s criminal history could be considered
Possibly on groups more highly-represented among renters as well
Most UDs are based on non-payment of rent and happen after an income disruption (lost job, loss of roommate etc.); note parallels to criminal records—except that there is not even necessarily a “conviction”
Could establish grounds for race, “color” based Disp. Imp. claims