The document is a rubric evaluating an assignment submitted by Pamela Añazco and Claudia Millafilo. According to the assessor Scarlett Espinoza: While the points made in the assignment were clear, some lacked relation to the terminology discussed in the Discourse Analysis course. Specifically, the purpose or function of the interview analyzed was clear but not explained in relation to course content like social function. The terminology used and its relation to the course concepts were not enough and there was no deeper analysis. The language use was accurate with no grammatical mistakes, but sentences were simpler and used common conjunctions rather than more complex structures. The format was clear and organized, making it easy

1. Discourse Analysis
Assignment2C Rubric
AssignmentEvaluated: PamelaAñazcoandClaudiaMillafilo
Assessor:ScarlettEspinoza
Poor
Below standard
Average
Minimum standards
Passing
Good performance
Comments and Concept
(Compulsory)
Content  Most points
(about 50%) not
accurately
analyzed
accordingto
course
contents.
 Basic course-
related
terminology
only.
 About 75% of
points are precisely
analyzed according
to coursecontents.
 Some course-
related terminology
has been used.
 All points (100%)
clearly analyzed
accordingto
coursecontents.
 Well-used
course-related
terminology.
All the points mentioned
were clear and explicitby
itself;however, some of them
lack of a relation to the
terminology that we have
been discussingin class about
DiscourseAnalysis.As an
example, the “purpose or
function” of the interview
was clear by itself;
nonetheless, it lacks of an
explanation related to the
content of the courseby
sayingwhether it has a social
function, etc.
The terminology used and its
relation to the coursewere
not enough.
No deeper analysis.
Language
Use
 Basic language
used.
 Mostly simple
sentences
 More than 4
mistakes,some
being very
serious ones.
 Coordinated
sentences used,
mostly containing
conjunctive
adverbs.
 Mostly simple
sentences
 Between 3- 4
mistakes,some
being very serious
ones.
 Proficientuseof
EFL.
 Mostly complex
sentences used in
the descriptions.
 Practically no
mistakes.
No grammatical mistakes
have been found. Accurate
use of the languagebut
simpler than complex.
Mostly use of some common
coordinated conjunctions
either “but” or “and” than
subordinated.
Format  Not easy to
follow.
 Images and/or
texts are
disorganized.
 Not well edited
material.
 Partof the
assignmentis not
easy to follow.
 Some of the images
and/or texts are
disorganized.
 Not well edited
material.
 Clear and
organized format.
 Easy to read and
follow.
 Well edited
material.
All the points were explained
clearly.
Easy to followand organized
format.
Any other commentsor feedback(optional)

2. Eventhough,the transcriptanalysiswasveryclearinany of the points,itlacksof a closerrelation totermsor
definitionsrelatedtothe course.Itseemstobe justthe analysisof aninterview,more thanananalysisbut
carriedout witha deepercourse- contentanalysis.