The document provides an overview of the FEMA Public Assistance appeals process, including:
- An introduction to the presenters and an outline of the topics to be covered which include the appeals process, first appeals, second appeals, arbitration, dos and don'ts, and a question period.
- A definition of key terms like appeal and administrative review, an explanation of the purpose and participants of the appeals process, as well as what determinations can be appealed.
- A detailed breakdown of the first and second appeal processes, including who is involved, deadlines, required documentation, and potential outcomes.
- An overview of the now expired Dispute Resolution Pilot Program which had allowed for binding arbitration in
Overview of FAA enforcement actions.July 2012Peyton Robinson
A presentation providing an overview of FAA enforcement actions directed at US pilots, but with broad information that may be applicable to aviation businesses as well. The presentation includes appendices which support the main body of the presentation.
After opening a non immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuitUmesh Heendeniya
This document from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit provides instructions for pro se petitioners filing non-immigration agency cases. It outlines key steps in the process such as including the case number on all documents, notifying the court of any address changes, paying required fees or applying for fee waiver, and filing briefs according to the court's time schedule order. It also provides an overview of the court's rules and procedures for brief formatting, electronic filing options, and requesting counsel.
Stage 5 - Resource Analysis for Teaching Sen's 'Toomelah'Paige Zavaglia
The document provides an analysis of the 2011 Indigenous Australian film "Toomelah" directed by Ivan Sen. It summarizes that the film tells the story of a 10-year old Aboriginal boy named Daniel who leaves school to join a gang. Though focused on challenging themes of poverty and disadvantage, the film balances this with moments of humor. It discusses how studying the film allows students to engage with a contemporary Indigenous narrative and critically examine their own cultural assumptions. Showing the film in a mixed-ability classroom provides accessible content to motivate student participation and engagement, while also presenting an opportunity to develop critical thinking skills through discussion of complex themes and language.
With yoga’s growing popularity, more and more people are wondering if yoga is right for them. Along with increasing awareness about the benefits of practicing yoga, it's inevitable that some of the myths and misconceptions about yoga might cause some confusion.
El documento define conceptos básicos de Internet como la red de redes, el protocolo HTTP para transferencia de hipertexto, navegadores para acceder a la web, buscadores para encontrar archivos en servidores web, la dirección URL para identificar recursos, blogs para compartir información personal y la dirección IP para identificar dispositivos en una red. También explica hipertexto para interactuar entre páginas, HTML para crear páginas web, XHTML para detectar errores técnicos y XML para almacenar y modificar datos entre páginas.
Jacob Schmidt is an experienced CNC programmer and manufacturing supervisor seeking a new position. He has over 15 years of experience in CNC programming, machining, welding, and supervising teams. His background includes programming and operating CNC mills and lathes, leading continuous improvement projects, and ensuring safety and quality standards. He is proficient in CAD/CAM software like Mastercam, Inventor, and EluCad.
FullHR is a human resources and benefits company founded in 2001 that provides services to organizations across multiple states. It develops customized processes for each client to help them achieve their goals. An integrated team approach assigns specialists from areas like HR, benefits, payroll, and workers' compensation to each client. The company has offices in several cities and provides a range of services including benefits enrollment and administration, payroll processing, HR consulting, and workers' compensation insurance.
Este documento resume los conceptos básicos de hardware y software. Explica que el hardware se refiere a los componentes físicos de una computadora como el teclado, disco duro y placa madre. Mientras que el software son los programas lógicos como antivirus y procesadores de texto que permiten que los componentes físicos funcionen. También incluye un enlace a un video sobre la historia del desarrollo de las computadoras.
Overview of FAA enforcement actions.July 2012Peyton Robinson
A presentation providing an overview of FAA enforcement actions directed at US pilots, but with broad information that may be applicable to aviation businesses as well. The presentation includes appendices which support the main body of the presentation.
After opening a non immigration case for pro se litigants – 9th circuitUmesh Heendeniya
This document from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit provides instructions for pro se petitioners filing non-immigration agency cases. It outlines key steps in the process such as including the case number on all documents, notifying the court of any address changes, paying required fees or applying for fee waiver, and filing briefs according to the court's time schedule order. It also provides an overview of the court's rules and procedures for brief formatting, electronic filing options, and requesting counsel.
Stage 5 - Resource Analysis for Teaching Sen's 'Toomelah'Paige Zavaglia
The document provides an analysis of the 2011 Indigenous Australian film "Toomelah" directed by Ivan Sen. It summarizes that the film tells the story of a 10-year old Aboriginal boy named Daniel who leaves school to join a gang. Though focused on challenging themes of poverty and disadvantage, the film balances this with moments of humor. It discusses how studying the film allows students to engage with a contemporary Indigenous narrative and critically examine their own cultural assumptions. Showing the film in a mixed-ability classroom provides accessible content to motivate student participation and engagement, while also presenting an opportunity to develop critical thinking skills through discussion of complex themes and language.
With yoga’s growing popularity, more and more people are wondering if yoga is right for them. Along with increasing awareness about the benefits of practicing yoga, it's inevitable that some of the myths and misconceptions about yoga might cause some confusion.
El documento define conceptos básicos de Internet como la red de redes, el protocolo HTTP para transferencia de hipertexto, navegadores para acceder a la web, buscadores para encontrar archivos en servidores web, la dirección URL para identificar recursos, blogs para compartir información personal y la dirección IP para identificar dispositivos en una red. También explica hipertexto para interactuar entre páginas, HTML para crear páginas web, XHTML para detectar errores técnicos y XML para almacenar y modificar datos entre páginas.
Jacob Schmidt is an experienced CNC programmer and manufacturing supervisor seeking a new position. He has over 15 years of experience in CNC programming, machining, welding, and supervising teams. His background includes programming and operating CNC mills and lathes, leading continuous improvement projects, and ensuring safety and quality standards. He is proficient in CAD/CAM software like Mastercam, Inventor, and EluCad.
FullHR is a human resources and benefits company founded in 2001 that provides services to organizations across multiple states. It develops customized processes for each client to help them achieve their goals. An integrated team approach assigns specialists from areas like HR, benefits, payroll, and workers' compensation to each client. The company has offices in several cities and provides a range of services including benefits enrollment and administration, payroll processing, HR consulting, and workers' compensation insurance.
Este documento resume los conceptos básicos de hardware y software. Explica que el hardware se refiere a los componentes físicos de una computadora como el teclado, disco duro y placa madre. Mientras que el software son los programas lógicos como antivirus y procesadores de texto que permiten que los componentes físicos funcionen. También incluye un enlace a un video sobre la historia del desarrollo de las computadoras.
This document provides information about informal inquiries and formal hearings for protesting property appraisals from the Williamson Central Appraisal District. It outlines the following key points:
1) Property owners can schedule an informal meeting with district staff to discuss concerns about their property value before filing a formal protest. This meeting may result in an adjusted value without needing a formal hearing.
2) If still in disagreement after the informal inquiry, an owner can file a protest to receive a formal hearing with the Appraisal Review Board. Protests must be filed by the deadline listed on the appraisal notice.
3) The Appraisal Review Board is an independent board that compares owner and district evidence to determine whether changes should be made to
The document provides an overview of the planning appeals process in Wales. It explains that applicants can appeal a planning decision if an application is refused, approved with conditions, not decided in time, or if further information was requested for an outline application. Appeals must generally be made within 6 months and be based on valid planning grounds. Appeals are handled by the Planning Inspectorate Wales and can be decided through a written process, public hearing, or public inquiry depending on complexity. The inspector makes the final decision to approve or dismiss the appeal, except for major projects which may be decided by the Welsh government. Appeals can only be challenged through judicial review.
1. The document discusses the rules and procedures for intercompany arbitration through Arbitration Forums regarding workers' compensation subrogation claims.
2. Key details include that arbitration is available for claims up to $250,000, parties must be signatories to the arbitration rules, and decisions are final and binding except appeals can be made for claims over $100,000.
3. Carriers can only submit claims through intercompany arbitration if the applicable jurisdiction recognizes the carrier's independent right of recovery for reimbursement of workers' compensation benefits paid.
The document summarizes the Consumer Protection Act and its relevance to dentistry in India. It outlines key definitions in the Act, such as complainant, complaint, consumer, and deficiency. It describes the three-tier quasi-judicial system established by the Act at the district, state, and national levels to handle consumer complaints and disputes. The forums have jurisdiction over complaints based on the value of services and compensation claimed. Their roles include referring complaints to the opposite party, settling disputes based on evidence, and issuing orders directing relief such as refunds or compensation. Losing parties can appeal higher forums' decisions.
Certificate of Relief from DisabilitiesTodd Spodek
This document provides instructions and an application for a Certificate of Relief from Disabilities or Certificate of Good Conduct from the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision. The application requires information about an applicant's convictions, residence history, employment, references, and authorization to release background information. It explains eligibility criteria for each certificate and the application process, which involves an investigation of submitted information and supporting documents by a parole officer.
This document discusses Louisiana medical malpractice law and risk management best practices. It covers definitions of malpractice, the medical review panel process, documentation standards, communication with patients, and strategies to prevent malpractice claims. Key aspects include the importance of thorough documentation, clear communication and instructions for patients, tracking follow-ups, and establishing systems to ensure all patient information is properly managed.
The document discusses strategies for home health agencies to prepare for Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) audits. It outlines the history of the RAC program, the audit process, potential targets like coding issues, and the 5-level appeals process. Agencies are advised to evaluate quarterly coding audits, ensure coding specificity, and prepare documentation in case of an audit or appeal. The appeals process involves redetermination, reconsideration, administrative law judge hearing, appeals council review, and potential judicial review, with various deadlines and requirements at each stage.
The document discusses strategies for home health agencies to prepare for Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) audits, including identifying high risk areas like therapy thresholds, reviewing documentation practices, and establishing an internal RAC response team to handle medical record requests and appeals. It also outlines the RAC review and appeal processes and provides tips for submitting supporting information to improve the chances of a favorable decision.
This document outlines the administrative procedure for complaints against civil service officials and employees in the Philippines. It discusses who may initiate a complaint, the requirements for complaints, the preliminary investigation process, the respondent's right to submit a counter-affidavit, potential preventive suspension of the respondent, formal investigation hearings, and rules around final decisions and appeals. The overall process involves fact-finding, allowing the respondent to reply to charges, potential suspension during the investigation, formal hearings if needed, a final decision, and appeal options depending on the imposed penalty.
PeopleMatter partner, SterlingBackcheck, walks through how new Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) regulations are impacting the background screening process ... for better or for worse.
This is a field-oriented PPT and deals with every step from the initiating to the finalization of the DAR case, which no other book has tried to explain and a lot of effort has gone into preparing the contents.
The document summarizes the consumer dispute redressal agencies in India. It outlines three levels of agencies established under the Consumer Protection Act of 1986 to handle consumer complaints - district forums established by state governments, state commissions established by state governments, and a national commission established by the central government. It provides details on the jurisdiction and authority of each agency to entertain consumer complaints regarding defective goods or deficient services based on the value of claims. The document also describes the composition, procedures to file and hear complaints, and rights to appeal orders at each level of the consumer dispute redressal system in India.
The document provides an overview of disciplinary procedures and rules (D&A Rules) for railway employees in India. It discusses topics like:
- Forms and authorities involved in disciplinary actions
- Grounds and process for suspension of employees
- Types of penalties under D&A Rules
- Principles of natural justice as per the Indian constitution
- Process for issuing a charge sheet
- Procedures for conducting disciplinary inquiries
- Situations where an inquiry may not be necessary
- Tactics sometimes used to delay disciplinary proceedings
The document is intended as a reference for understanding D&A Rules and properly handling disciplinary cases and inquiries against railway employees according to due process.
This document outlines the procedures for appealing Commission on Audit (COA) disallowances under Philippine law. It begins by discussing fundamental principles of financial transactions and the COA's constitutional mandate to audit government accounts. It then describes COA's audit services and general requirements for disbursements. The majority of the document details the multi-step appeals process, which involves submitting appeals to the Auditor, Regional Director, COA Commission Proper, and ultimately the Supreme Court if needed. It concludes by explaining rules regarding enforcement of final COA decisions, including issuance of notices of decision finality and orders of execution.
The document summarizes the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) and the grievance process for Pennsylvania state prisons.
The PLRA introduced several restrictions on prisoner lawsuits, including requiring exhaustion of administrative remedies, limiting compensatory damages to cases involving physical injury, and imposing filing restrictions on prisoners with multiple dismissed lawsuits.
The Pennsylvania DOC grievance process requires prisoners to file grievances within 15 days of an issue, submit them to the Facility Grievance Coordinator, and receive a response within 15 days. Appeals can be made to the Facility Manager and then to the Secretary's Office of Inmate Grievances and Appeals. Proper exhaustion of this grievance process is necessary to preserve legal claims regarding
1) Nathan Eagle of Honolulu Civil Beat submitted a records request to the Governor's office seeking travel records and related expenses of Governor Neil Abercrombie from December 2010 to June 2013.
2) The Governor's office provided notice that it will grant the request in part but withhold some personal information like home addresses and phone numbers pursuant to a public records exemption.
3) The records will be provided incrementally as searching, reviewing, and preparing the voluminous records for disclosure will require extensive agency efforts estimated at 6.5 hours for search and 47 hours for review and segregation. The requester must prepay estimated fees of $945 and costs of $1016 for the first increment of records.
25 Appeal Letters and Using PPACA For Today's AppealsTammy Tipton
The document discusses strategies for appealing health insurance claim denials using the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). It outlines 8 steps for appealing medical necessity denials and provides templates for 25 types of appeals, focusing on obtaining full disclosure from insurers and citing legal and compliance issues. The presenter recommends negotiating stronger provider terms in managed care contracts and pursuing external review when necessary.
Sunshine Act and other Laws Affecting Vendor RelationsHolland & Hart LLP
Here Comes the Sun – New Transparency for
Vendor Relationships
To Whom Does the Sunshine Act Apply?
What is the Disclosure Process?
What are the Penalties and Consequences?
Other Laws and Legal Considerations for Vendor
Relations
– Conflicts of Interest
– Drug Samples
– Fraud and Abuse Laws
This document provides information about the civil appeals process in Massachusetts courts. It explains that if a party is dissatisfied with a trial court judgment, they have the right to appeal after final judgment. It outlines the steps to file an appeal, including filing a notice of appeal within 30 days, ordering transcripts if needed, docketing the appeal by paying a fee, and filing an appellant's brief and record appendix within 40 days. The brief must follow specific formatting rules and include sections like statements of issues, facts, and legal argument supported by authorities.
More Related Content
Similar to Appeals Presentation - TDEM Conference Final
This document provides information about informal inquiries and formal hearings for protesting property appraisals from the Williamson Central Appraisal District. It outlines the following key points:
1) Property owners can schedule an informal meeting with district staff to discuss concerns about their property value before filing a formal protest. This meeting may result in an adjusted value without needing a formal hearing.
2) If still in disagreement after the informal inquiry, an owner can file a protest to receive a formal hearing with the Appraisal Review Board. Protests must be filed by the deadline listed on the appraisal notice.
3) The Appraisal Review Board is an independent board that compares owner and district evidence to determine whether changes should be made to
The document provides an overview of the planning appeals process in Wales. It explains that applicants can appeal a planning decision if an application is refused, approved with conditions, not decided in time, or if further information was requested for an outline application. Appeals must generally be made within 6 months and be based on valid planning grounds. Appeals are handled by the Planning Inspectorate Wales and can be decided through a written process, public hearing, or public inquiry depending on complexity. The inspector makes the final decision to approve or dismiss the appeal, except for major projects which may be decided by the Welsh government. Appeals can only be challenged through judicial review.
1. The document discusses the rules and procedures for intercompany arbitration through Arbitration Forums regarding workers' compensation subrogation claims.
2. Key details include that arbitration is available for claims up to $250,000, parties must be signatories to the arbitration rules, and decisions are final and binding except appeals can be made for claims over $100,000.
3. Carriers can only submit claims through intercompany arbitration if the applicable jurisdiction recognizes the carrier's independent right of recovery for reimbursement of workers' compensation benefits paid.
The document summarizes the Consumer Protection Act and its relevance to dentistry in India. It outlines key definitions in the Act, such as complainant, complaint, consumer, and deficiency. It describes the three-tier quasi-judicial system established by the Act at the district, state, and national levels to handle consumer complaints and disputes. The forums have jurisdiction over complaints based on the value of services and compensation claimed. Their roles include referring complaints to the opposite party, settling disputes based on evidence, and issuing orders directing relief such as refunds or compensation. Losing parties can appeal higher forums' decisions.
Certificate of Relief from DisabilitiesTodd Spodek
This document provides instructions and an application for a Certificate of Relief from Disabilities or Certificate of Good Conduct from the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision. The application requires information about an applicant's convictions, residence history, employment, references, and authorization to release background information. It explains eligibility criteria for each certificate and the application process, which involves an investigation of submitted information and supporting documents by a parole officer.
This document discusses Louisiana medical malpractice law and risk management best practices. It covers definitions of malpractice, the medical review panel process, documentation standards, communication with patients, and strategies to prevent malpractice claims. Key aspects include the importance of thorough documentation, clear communication and instructions for patients, tracking follow-ups, and establishing systems to ensure all patient information is properly managed.
The document discusses strategies for home health agencies to prepare for Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) audits. It outlines the history of the RAC program, the audit process, potential targets like coding issues, and the 5-level appeals process. Agencies are advised to evaluate quarterly coding audits, ensure coding specificity, and prepare documentation in case of an audit or appeal. The appeals process involves redetermination, reconsideration, administrative law judge hearing, appeals council review, and potential judicial review, with various deadlines and requirements at each stage.
The document discusses strategies for home health agencies to prepare for Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) audits, including identifying high risk areas like therapy thresholds, reviewing documentation practices, and establishing an internal RAC response team to handle medical record requests and appeals. It also outlines the RAC review and appeal processes and provides tips for submitting supporting information to improve the chances of a favorable decision.
This document outlines the administrative procedure for complaints against civil service officials and employees in the Philippines. It discusses who may initiate a complaint, the requirements for complaints, the preliminary investigation process, the respondent's right to submit a counter-affidavit, potential preventive suspension of the respondent, formal investigation hearings, and rules around final decisions and appeals. The overall process involves fact-finding, allowing the respondent to reply to charges, potential suspension during the investigation, formal hearings if needed, a final decision, and appeal options depending on the imposed penalty.
PeopleMatter partner, SterlingBackcheck, walks through how new Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) regulations are impacting the background screening process ... for better or for worse.
This is a field-oriented PPT and deals with every step from the initiating to the finalization of the DAR case, which no other book has tried to explain and a lot of effort has gone into preparing the contents.
The document summarizes the consumer dispute redressal agencies in India. It outlines three levels of agencies established under the Consumer Protection Act of 1986 to handle consumer complaints - district forums established by state governments, state commissions established by state governments, and a national commission established by the central government. It provides details on the jurisdiction and authority of each agency to entertain consumer complaints regarding defective goods or deficient services based on the value of claims. The document also describes the composition, procedures to file and hear complaints, and rights to appeal orders at each level of the consumer dispute redressal system in India.
The document provides an overview of disciplinary procedures and rules (D&A Rules) for railway employees in India. It discusses topics like:
- Forms and authorities involved in disciplinary actions
- Grounds and process for suspension of employees
- Types of penalties under D&A Rules
- Principles of natural justice as per the Indian constitution
- Process for issuing a charge sheet
- Procedures for conducting disciplinary inquiries
- Situations where an inquiry may not be necessary
- Tactics sometimes used to delay disciplinary proceedings
The document is intended as a reference for understanding D&A Rules and properly handling disciplinary cases and inquiries against railway employees according to due process.
This document outlines the procedures for appealing Commission on Audit (COA) disallowances under Philippine law. It begins by discussing fundamental principles of financial transactions and the COA's constitutional mandate to audit government accounts. It then describes COA's audit services and general requirements for disbursements. The majority of the document details the multi-step appeals process, which involves submitting appeals to the Auditor, Regional Director, COA Commission Proper, and ultimately the Supreme Court if needed. It concludes by explaining rules regarding enforcement of final COA decisions, including issuance of notices of decision finality and orders of execution.
The document summarizes the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) and the grievance process for Pennsylvania state prisons.
The PLRA introduced several restrictions on prisoner lawsuits, including requiring exhaustion of administrative remedies, limiting compensatory damages to cases involving physical injury, and imposing filing restrictions on prisoners with multiple dismissed lawsuits.
The Pennsylvania DOC grievance process requires prisoners to file grievances within 15 days of an issue, submit them to the Facility Grievance Coordinator, and receive a response within 15 days. Appeals can be made to the Facility Manager and then to the Secretary's Office of Inmate Grievances and Appeals. Proper exhaustion of this grievance process is necessary to preserve legal claims regarding
1) Nathan Eagle of Honolulu Civil Beat submitted a records request to the Governor's office seeking travel records and related expenses of Governor Neil Abercrombie from December 2010 to June 2013.
2) The Governor's office provided notice that it will grant the request in part but withhold some personal information like home addresses and phone numbers pursuant to a public records exemption.
3) The records will be provided incrementally as searching, reviewing, and preparing the voluminous records for disclosure will require extensive agency efforts estimated at 6.5 hours for search and 47 hours for review and segregation. The requester must prepay estimated fees of $945 and costs of $1016 for the first increment of records.
25 Appeal Letters and Using PPACA For Today's AppealsTammy Tipton
The document discusses strategies for appealing health insurance claim denials using the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). It outlines 8 steps for appealing medical necessity denials and provides templates for 25 types of appeals, focusing on obtaining full disclosure from insurers and citing legal and compliance issues. The presenter recommends negotiating stronger provider terms in managed care contracts and pursuing external review when necessary.
Sunshine Act and other Laws Affecting Vendor RelationsHolland & Hart LLP
Here Comes the Sun – New Transparency for
Vendor Relationships
To Whom Does the Sunshine Act Apply?
What is the Disclosure Process?
What are the Penalties and Consequences?
Other Laws and Legal Considerations for Vendor
Relations
– Conflicts of Interest
– Drug Samples
– Fraud and Abuse Laws
This document provides information about the civil appeals process in Massachusetts courts. It explains that if a party is dissatisfied with a trial court judgment, they have the right to appeal after final judgment. It outlines the steps to file an appeal, including filing a notice of appeal within 30 days, ordering transcripts if needed, docketing the appeal by paying a fee, and filing an appellant's brief and record appendix within 40 days. The brief must follow specific formatting rules and include sections like statements of issues, facts, and legal argument supported by authorities.
Similar to Appeals Presentation - TDEM Conference Final (20)
3. P r e s e n t e r s
Zein Jivani
Attorney at Law
Sarah Lawrence
Senior Consultant
Roman Castillo
Senior Consultant
4. P r e s e n t a t i o n O v e r v i e w
Today’s Presentation:
General Overview
Appeals Process
First Appeals
Second Appeals
Arbitration
Do’s and Don’ts
Questions
6. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
D e f i n i t i o n s
Appeal – A proceeding undertaken to have a decision reconsidered by a higher
authority, especially the submission of a lower court’s or agency’s decision to a higher
court for review and possible reversal.
Administrative Review – Review of an administrative proceeding within the agency
itself.
This presentation will focus on appeals process, procedure, and
guidelines within the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s
Public Assistance Program.
7. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
P u r p o s e o f A p p e a l
Appeals Process
• The FEMA appeals process is designed to "create an organized, consistent, and
efficient system" for responding to Public Assistance Program disputes.
• Process aims to ensure that applicants obtain accurate, fair, and well-reasoned
eligibility determinations that are consistent with applicable statutes, regulations, and
policies.
8. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
W h o M a y S u b m i t a n A p p e a l ?
The Public Assistance Program
appeal process is available to:
• Applicants
• Recipients
• Subrecipients
9. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
W h a t M a y I A p p e a l ?
Subrecipients may appeal any FEMA determination related to an
application for, or the provision of, assistance under the PA Program.
Stafford Act § 423, codified at 42 U.S.C. § 5189a
44 C.F.R. § § 206.206
10. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
H o w M a y I A p p e a l ?
Subrecipients must submit a written appeal to the Recipient (TDEM)
within 60 days of receiving written notification of FEMA’s determination.
• 44 CFR § 206.206(c)(1)
TDEM must forward the appeal with its written recommendation to FEMA
within 60 days of its receipt of the appeal.
• 44 CFR § 206.206(c)(2)
9April 14, 2016
11. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
W h a t M a y I A p p e a l ?
Request for Public Assistance
An Applicant’s first need to submit an Appeal may arise immediately following FEMA’s
rejection of a Request for Public Assistance.
10April 14, 2016
13. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
A p p e a l s – S o m e t i m e s U n a v o i d a b l e
The goal is to avoid Appeals altogether, but sometimes, Appeals are
necessary and unavoidable.
Common Appeals
Net Small Project Overrun appeal
Procurement (Emergency Procurements)
Reasonableness (Costs)
Cost Estimate/Scope of Work (PW writing)
12April 14, 2016
14. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
A d m i n i s t r a t i v e R e v i e w
You are entitled to two opportunities for Administrative Review:
• FEMA Regional Administrator - 1st Appeal; and if necessary
• Assistant Administrator for the Recovery Directorate at FEMA HQ - 2nd Appeal
15. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
D i s p u t e R e s o l u t i o n P i l o t P r o g r a m
In the future, Arbitration may be an option in Lieu of Second Appeals:
• The Sandy Recovery Improvement Act, passed in 2013, established a dispute
resolution pilot program that enabled applicants, in certain cases, to forgo a second
appeal in favor of binding arbitration before an independent panel.
• Pilot Program ended December 31, 2015.
• Option not currently available to Applicants.
16. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
D i s p u t e R e s o l u t i o n P i l o t P r o g r a m
Arbitration Pilot Program :
Was available to Applicants that received a 1st Appeal Decision
Amount in dispute ≥ $1,031,000.00
Assistance pertains to disaster declaration after October 30, 2012.
18. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
F i r s t A p p e a l
First Appeal Process:
• Filed by a Subrecipient with FEMA
Regional Administration.
• For Texas Subrecipients, the FEMA
Regional Administration is Region VI.
• Region VI oversees federal emergency
management for Arkansas, Louisiana,
New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas and 68
federally recognized Tribal Nations.
19. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
W h a t H a p p e n s w i t h M y A p p e a l ?
FEMA reviews Appeal and, within 90 days of receiving it, takes one of two
actions:
• Provides its final written decision to the Recipient; OR
• Requests additional information specifying the date FEMA must receive the
information (usually 30 days).
• 44 CFR § 206.206(c)(3)
18April 14, 2016
20. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
W h a t H a p p e n s w i t h M y A p p e a l ?
First Appeal Process
1. Subrecipient disputes a FEMA Decision;
2. Subrecipient submits written Appeal to TDEM within 60 days of receipt of adverse
decision;
3. TDEM forwards Appeal, supporting documentation, and TDEM’s recommendations to
FEMA within 60 days of receipt of subrecipient’s appeal;
4. FEMA creates an administrative record for the Appeal;
5. FEMA may issue a Request for Information (30 day response time);
6. Regional Administrator issues a Decision to TDEM within 90 days of receiving all
information necessary to make a decision;
7. TDEM transmits Decision to Subrecipient including information pertaining to Second
Appeal rights.
19April 14, 2016
22. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
S e c o n d A p p e a l
Second Appeal:
2nd Appeal filed by a Subrecipient
following FEMA Regional
Administration’s First Appeal decision.
2nd Appeal is evaluated and decided by
FEMA’s Assistant Administrator for the
Recovery Directorate.
Mr. Alex Amparo is the Assistant
Administrator of the Recovery
Directorate at the Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
23. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
W h a t H a p p e n s w i t h M y A p p e a l ?
Second Appeal Process
1. Subrecipient disputes FEMA First Appeal Decision;
2. Subrecipient submits written Second Appeal to TDEM within 60 days of receipt of the
First Appeal decision;
3. TDEM forwards the Second Appeal to the Regional Administrator;
4. The Regional Administrator forwards the Second Appeal to FEMA headquarters for
review and decision;
5. FEMA may issue a Request for Information (30 day response time);
6. Assistant Administrator issues a Decision to TDEM within 90 days of receiving all
information necessary to make a decision;
7. TDEM transmits Decision to Subrecipient.
22April 14, 2016
24. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
R e c e n t C h a n g e s
Important Policy Change
• As of 04/07/14, it is no longer allowed or required to submit additional documentation
with a Second Appeal.
• The First Appeal package is the same package that will go to FEMA HQ for a Second
Appeal. This is your administrative record.
• First Appeal must include your regulatory justification.
• FEMA could issue RFI on Second Appeal and provide an opportunity to submit further
support, but it is not guaranteed.
26. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
D i s p u t e R e s o l u t i o n P i l o t P r o g r a m
Pilot Program Arbitration Process:
1. Request for arbitration submitted to FEMA and Recipient (TDEM) within 15 days of
First Appeal decision.
2. Subrecipient has 60 days to submit Arbitration Statement of Claim.
Arbitration Statement of Claim:
Statement of Claim states the basis for the Applicant’s
claim and the demand for relief.
27. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
D i s p u t e R e s o l u t i o n P i l o t P r o g r a m
Arbitration Process:
3. Administrative record—FEMA provides a copy of all the documents and materials
directly or indirectly considered by the agency and relied upon in making the 1st
appeal determination.
4. Appointment of Panel—An independent review panel consisting of three
Administrative Law Judges. Applicant statement of claim—applicant provides a
statement clarifying the disputed aspects of the 1st appeal determination and support
for their claim.
5. FEMA response—FEMA provides a memorandum in support of its position and the
name and address of its authorized representative.
28. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
D i s p u t e R e s o l u t i o n P i l o t P r o g r a m
Arbitration Process:
6. The administrative record will constitute the whole of the evidence that may be
considered in order to make a determination on the claim.
7. Preliminary admin conference—provides opportunity to discuss the conduct of the
hearing and answer procedural questions.
8. Hearing—presentation of positions and witnesses, as appropriate, to an independent
panel either in person or by teleconference.
9. Panel decision—The panel issues a written and reasoned decision that sets forth the
findings of fact and conclusions of law.
30. A P P E A L S
P R O C E S S :
V I S U A L I Z A T I O N
Debris Removal Emergency Protective
Measures
Permanent Work
Categories of Work Appeals
31. A P P E A L S
P R O C E S S :
V I S U A L I Z A T I O N
Most Common Appeal Reasons
32. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
F a c t o r s t o C o n s i d e r
Factors to Consider When Submitting an Appeal
• Time
• Costs
• Project Delays
• Potential Legal Remedies
33. A P P E A L S
P R O C E S S :
V I S U A L I Z A T I O N
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Denied Granted Partially Granted Rescinded Under Review
Total
34. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
W h a t t o I n c l u d e i n t h e A p p e a l ?
33April 14, 2016
When writing any Appeal, FEMA requires that the Appeal must:
• Contain documented justification supporting your position from the administrative
record (administrative record);
• Specify the monetary figure in dispute; AND
• Cite to the provisions in federal law or policy with which you believe the determination
was inconsistent.
35. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
S t a t u t e s & R e g u l a t i o n s
34April 14, 2016
What are the laws?
• Stafford Act, codified at 42 U.S.C. §§ 5121 et. seq.
• Chapters 2 and 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations
• Chapter 2 – Grants and Agreements
• Chapter 44 – Emergency Management and Assistance
36. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
S t a t u t e s & R e g u l a t i o n s
35April 14, 2016
Who makes these laws?
• The Stafford Act and amendments made to the Act, such as the Sandy Recovery
Improvement Act of 2013, are passed by Congress (statutes).
• The rules to receive and maintain government grants are written by the Office of
Management and Budget (regulation).
• The rules to implement the Stafford Act are written by FEMA (regulation).
37. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
P r e c e d e n c e
Precedent – An action or official decision that can be used as support for later actions
or decisions, especially a decided case that furnishes a basis for determining later cases
involving similar facts or issues.
36April 14, 2016
38. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
F E M A A p p e a l D a t a b a s e
What is the Appeals Database?
• Searchable Database
• Appeal Briefs
• Appeal Letters
• Appeal Analysis
• https://www.fema.gov/appeals
Using the Appeals Database to
formulating your appeal
• Determine what factors FEMA
reviewed during decision-making
• Look for regulatory citations
• Precedence; cite previous decisions
April 14, 2016 37
39. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
U n s u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l
Second Appeal Letter
FEMA-1692-DR
• Albany County
• Project Worksheet 2175
• Snow Removal
• 09/29/2008
38April 14, 2016
40. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
U n s u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l
1. Applicant used force account labor,
material, and equipment for general
roadway snow removal, sanding, and
salting.
2. FEMA determined the requested snow
removal costs were ineligible, because
the event was not declared as a snow,
or severe winter storm/snow
emergency.
3. First Appeal letter- Applicant states
that FEMA misapplied 44 CFR
§206.227
4. Applicant argues that the snow
removal activities lessened immediate
threats of significant additional
damage to improved public or private
property as eligible emergency
protective measures.
April 14, 2016 39
41. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
U n s u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l
5. Regional Administrator denied the
appeal because the State did not
request, and the President did not
include, snow removal costs in the
declaration.
6. Applicant submitted its Second
Appeal, reiterating that neither the
Stafford Act nor the Code of Federal
Regulations requires States to specify
emergency actions that it seeks
reimbursement for in the Governor's
request for a major disaster
declaration.
7. Applicant also asserts that FEMA
approved and funded PWs
for Category B, emergency protective
measures, for snow removal from
roads and rights-of-way in FEMA-
1665-DR-NY.
April 14, 2016 40
42. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
U n s u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l
8. FEMA Recovery Directorate
determines Regional Administrator's
decision in the First Appeal is
consistent with Public Assistance
regulations and policy & denies
Second Appeal.
9. Second Appeal denial letter references
44 CFR §206.227, Snow Assistance.
States that “Emergency or Major
Disaster declarations based on snow
or blizzard conditions will be made
only for cases of record or near record
snowstorms…”Response
10. Second Appeal denial letter references
Recovery Directorate Policy Number
9523.1,Snow Assistance, which states
that FEMA will provide limited
assistance for snow removal only
when the incident type is “snow”
or “snowfall.”
April 14, 2016 41
43. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
U n s u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l
11. DR-1692 = New York Severe Storms
and Inland and Coastal Flooding
12. Appeal Denied. Snow assistance is
not authorized for this type of
declaration.
April 14, 2016 42
44. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
S u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l
Second Appeal Letter
FEMA-1609-DR
• City of Fort Lauderdale
• PW02932
• Procurement
• 11/25/2015
April 14, 2016 43
45. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
S u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l
1. Hurricane Wilma struck South Florida
leaving substantial mixed storm debris
throughout the City of Fort
Lauderdale.
2. Applicant had a pre-existing contract
with Debris Removal Contractor and
subsequently initiated removal
operations.
3. To aid in the removal work, the
Applicant hired 17 additional
contractors under Time and Material
(T&M) contracts.
April 14, 2016 44
46. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
S u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l
4. FEMA prepared Project Worksheet
(PW) 2932 and obligated an estimated
$24,636,490.60 to complete the work.
5. U.S. Department of Homeland
Security’s Office of Inspector General
(OIG) found that the Applicant did not
follow proper procurement procedures
when awarding debris removal
contracts under T&M contracts.
6. In total, OIG recommended a
disallowance of $10,325,949.00. In
concurrence with OIG’s findings and
recommendations, FEMA deobligated
$10,325,949.00 of funding from PW.
April 14, 2016 45
47. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
S u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l
7. Applicant submitted its First Appeal.
Disputed $9,957,557.00 in disallowed
costs.
8. Applicant argued:
A. FEMA failed to prepare accurate
‘Narrative’ for Scope of Work.
B. Costs were reasonable to protect
public health, safety, & welfare.
C. T&M contract rates were
reasonable under the
circumstances.
9. FEMA Region IV Regional
Administrator (RA) denied the First
Appeal
10. Regional Administrator found:
A. Scope of Work language was not
general in nature;
B. 70 hour limit for T&M contracts were
greatly exceeded.
April 14, 2016 46
48. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
S u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l
11. Applicant’s Second Appeal letter to
FEMA argued:
A. Debris Removal contract and T&M
contracts stipulated a variety of
debris removal related services.
B. Debris removal rates were
reasonable compared to rates
claimed by applicants in
neighboring jurisdictions.
C. Debris removal rate pursuant to pre-
disaster contract and not indicative
of the higher rates typically
encountered following multiple
disaster events.
12. Appeal Results:
A. Provided sufficient documentation to
demonstrate that it performed
eligible debris removal within the
SOW.
B. Adequate documentation was
provided to substantiate the costs
incurred.
C. Adequately demonstrated that the
rate charged by its contractors were
reasonable when compared to rates
paid by similarly situated applicants
from surrounding jurisdictions
April 14, 2016 47
49. A P P E A L S
P R O C E S S :
S u c c e s s f u l
A p p e a l
13. FEMA reimbursed
$9,957,555.00.
48April 14, 2016
50. B e s t P r a c t i c e s
Communication
Supporting
Documentation
Arbitration
Time
Limitations
Cite
Regs.
Precedence
49April 14, 2016
Zein
Source: Black’s Law Dictionary (10th ed. 2014)
Zein
Source: Recovery Directorate Directive - Public Assistance Program Appeals
Zein
Zein
All applicants for federal disaster assistance are entitled to appeal any FEMA decision regarding eligibility for, or amount of, such assistance. - Recovery Directive Manual, Forward at 2.
Zein
Zein
Sarah
Sarah
Net Small Project Overrun appeal
Actual costs > FEMA Estimates
Procurement (Emergency Procurements)
Costs are disallowed due to improper procurement, however, you have documentation to prove exigency.
Reasonableness (Costs)
FEMA disallows costs b/c contract costs are too high. However, you have a solid argument to explain why your contract prices are reasonable given the circumstances.
Cost Estimate/Scope of Work (PW writing)
Sarah
applicants for federal disaster assistance are entitled to appeal any FEMA decision regarding eligibility for, or amount of, such assistance. - Recovery Directive Manual, Forward at 2.
Sarah
44 C.F.R. § § 206.210
Sarah
By statute, the pilot program is authorized through December 2015. Following the conclusion of the pilot program, the Comptroller General of the United States will issue a report to congress analyzing the effectiveness of the program. Source: http://www.fema.gov/sandy-recovery-improvement-act-2013 (RC)
Roman
Roman
No hearing. It is all paper appeal.
Roman
Roman
Roman
Roman
Roman
Roman
Zein
Zein
Zein
Source: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-08-16/pdf/2013-19887.pdf (RC)
Zein
Source: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-08-16/pdf/2013-19887.pdf (RC)
Sarah
Sarah
Sarah
Sarah
The Federal Government shall not be liable for any claim based upon the exercise or performance of or the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary function or duty on the part of a Federal agency or an employee of the Federal Government in carrying out the provisions of this chapter. 42 USC § 5148.
See St. Tammany Parish v. FEMA, 556 F.3d 307 (5th Cir. 2009) (dismissing case brought by grantee challenging FEMA’s denial of certain disaster aid based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction because decision to provide funds is a discretionary function); see also City of Laguna Niguel v. FEMA, No. 09-0198, 2009 WL 3122490, at *5 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 28, 2009) (concluding “the grant or denial of an application for federal assistance is a ‘discretionary function or duty’ under the Stafford Act for which the federal government’s actions are not subject to judicial review pursuant to sovereign immunity”).
But see South Florida Water Management Dist. v. FEMA, No. 13-80533-CIV, 2014 WL 4805856, at *10 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 18, 2014) (concluding FEMA has no discretion to recover funds and thus sovereign immunity does not apply when 42 USC 5148 applies).
Sarah
Sarah & Zein
Talking point - $ in question.
Zein
Zein
Zein
Insert flow chart for statute, regulation, precedence.