SlideShare a Scribd company logo
TDEM CONFERENCE 2016
F E M A P A : N A V I G A T I N G T H E A P P E A L S
P R O C E S S
I . I n t r o d u c t i o n s
P r e s e n t e r s
Zein Jivani
Attorney at Law
Sarah Lawrence
Senior Consultant
Roman Castillo
Senior Consultant
P r e s e n t a t i o n O v e r v i e w
Today’s Presentation:
 General Overview
 Appeals Process
 First Appeals
 Second Appeals
 Arbitration
 Do’s and Don’ts
 Questions
I I . O v e r v i e w
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
D e f i n i t i o n s
Appeal – A proceeding undertaken to have a decision reconsidered by a higher
authority, especially the submission of a lower court’s or agency’s decision to a higher
court for review and possible reversal.
Administrative Review – Review of an administrative proceeding within the agency
itself.
This presentation will focus on appeals process, procedure, and
guidelines within the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s
Public Assistance Program.
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
P u r p o s e o f A p p e a l
Appeals Process
• The FEMA appeals process is designed to "create an organized, consistent, and
efficient system" for responding to Public Assistance Program disputes.
• Process aims to ensure that applicants obtain accurate, fair, and well-reasoned
eligibility determinations that are consistent with applicable statutes, regulations, and
policies.
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
W h o M a y S u b m i t a n A p p e a l ?
The Public Assistance Program
appeal process is available to:
• Applicants
• Recipients
• Subrecipients
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
W h a t M a y I A p p e a l ?
Subrecipients may appeal any FEMA determination related to an
application for, or the provision of, assistance under the PA Program.
 Stafford Act § 423, codified at 42 U.S.C. § 5189a
 44 C.F.R. § § 206.206
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
H o w M a y I A p p e a l ?
Subrecipients must submit a written appeal to the Recipient (TDEM)
within 60 days of receiving written notification of FEMA’s determination.
• 44 CFR § 206.206(c)(1)
TDEM must forward the appeal with its written recommendation to FEMA
within 60 days of its receipt of the appeal.
• 44 CFR § 206.206(c)(2)
9April 14, 2016
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
W h a t M a y I A p p e a l ?
Request for Public Assistance
An Applicant’s first need to submit an Appeal may arise immediately following FEMA’s
rejection of a Request for Public Assistance.
10April 14, 2016
I I I . P r o c e s s
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
A p p e a l s – S o m e t i m e s U n a v o i d a b l e
The goal is to avoid Appeals altogether, but sometimes, Appeals are
necessary and unavoidable.
Common Appeals
 Net Small Project Overrun appeal
 Procurement (Emergency Procurements)
 Reasonableness (Costs)
 Cost Estimate/Scope of Work (PW writing)
12April 14, 2016
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
A d m i n i s t r a t i v e R e v i e w
You are entitled to two opportunities for Administrative Review:
• FEMA Regional Administrator - 1st Appeal; and if necessary
• Assistant Administrator for the Recovery Directorate at FEMA HQ - 2nd Appeal
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
D i s p u t e R e s o l u t i o n P i l o t P r o g r a m
In the future, Arbitration may be an option in Lieu of Second Appeals:
• The Sandy Recovery Improvement Act, passed in 2013, established a dispute
resolution pilot program that enabled applicants, in certain cases, to forgo a second
appeal in favor of binding arbitration before an independent panel.
• Pilot Program ended December 31, 2015.
• Option not currently available to Applicants.
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
D i s p u t e R e s o l u t i o n P i l o t P r o g r a m
Arbitration Pilot Program :
 Was available to Applicants that received a 1st Appeal Decision
 Amount in dispute ≥ $1,031,000.00
 Assistance pertains to disaster declaration after October 30, 2012.
I V. F i r s t A p p e a l
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
F i r s t A p p e a l
First Appeal Process:
• Filed by a Subrecipient with FEMA
Regional Administration.
• For Texas Subrecipients, the FEMA
Regional Administration is Region VI.
• Region VI oversees federal emergency
management for Arkansas, Louisiana,
New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas and 68
federally recognized Tribal Nations.
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
W h a t H a p p e n s w i t h M y A p p e a l ?
FEMA reviews Appeal and, within 90 days of receiving it, takes one of two
actions:
• Provides its final written decision to the Recipient; OR
• Requests additional information specifying the date FEMA must receive the
information (usually 30 days).
• 44 CFR § 206.206(c)(3)
18April 14, 2016
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
W h a t H a p p e n s w i t h M y A p p e a l ?
First Appeal Process
1. Subrecipient disputes a FEMA Decision;
2. Subrecipient submits written Appeal to TDEM within 60 days of receipt of adverse
decision;
3. TDEM forwards Appeal, supporting documentation, and TDEM’s recommendations to
FEMA within 60 days of receipt of subrecipient’s appeal;
4. FEMA creates an administrative record for the Appeal;
5. FEMA may issue a Request for Information (30 day response time);
6. Regional Administrator issues a Decision to TDEM within 90 days of receiving all
information necessary to make a decision;
7. TDEM transmits Decision to Subrecipient including information pertaining to Second
Appeal rights.
19April 14, 2016
V. S e c o n d A p p e a l
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
S e c o n d A p p e a l
Second Appeal:
 2nd Appeal filed by a Subrecipient
following FEMA Regional
Administration’s First Appeal decision.
 2nd Appeal is evaluated and decided by
FEMA’s Assistant Administrator for the
Recovery Directorate.
 Mr. Alex Amparo is the Assistant
Administrator of the Recovery
Directorate at the Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
W h a t H a p p e n s w i t h M y A p p e a l ?
Second Appeal Process
1. Subrecipient disputes FEMA First Appeal Decision;
2. Subrecipient submits written Second Appeal to TDEM within 60 days of receipt of the
First Appeal decision;
3. TDEM forwards the Second Appeal to the Regional Administrator;
4. The Regional Administrator forwards the Second Appeal to FEMA headquarters for
review and decision;
5. FEMA may issue a Request for Information (30 day response time);
6. Assistant Administrator issues a Decision to TDEM within 90 days of receiving all
information necessary to make a decision;
7. TDEM transmits Decision to Subrecipient.
22April 14, 2016
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
R e c e n t C h a n g e s
Important Policy Change
• As of 04/07/14, it is no longer allowed or required to submit additional documentation
with a Second Appeal.
• The First Appeal package is the same package that will go to FEMA HQ for a Second
Appeal. This is your administrative record.
• First Appeal must include your regulatory justification.
• FEMA could issue RFI on Second Appeal and provide an opportunity to submit further
support, but it is not guaranteed.
V I . A r b i t r a t i o n
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
D i s p u t e R e s o l u t i o n P i l o t P r o g r a m
Pilot Program Arbitration Process:
1. Request for arbitration submitted to FEMA and Recipient (TDEM) within 15 days of
First Appeal decision.
2. Subrecipient has 60 days to submit Arbitration Statement of Claim.
Arbitration Statement of Claim:
Statement of Claim states the basis for the Applicant’s
claim and the demand for relief.
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
D i s p u t e R e s o l u t i o n P i l o t P r o g r a m
Arbitration Process:
3. Administrative record—FEMA provides a copy of all the documents and materials
directly or indirectly considered by the agency and relied upon in making the 1st
appeal determination.
4. Appointment of Panel—An independent review panel consisting of three
Administrative Law Judges. Applicant statement of claim—applicant provides a
statement clarifying the disputed aspects of the 1st appeal determination and support
for their claim.
5. FEMA response—FEMA provides a memorandum in support of its position and the
name and address of its authorized representative.
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
D i s p u t e R e s o l u t i o n P i l o t P r o g r a m
Arbitration Process:
6. The administrative record will constitute the whole of the evidence that may be
considered in order to make a determination on the claim.
7. Preliminary admin conference—provides opportunity to discuss the conduct of the
hearing and answer procedural questions.
8. Hearing—presentation of positions and witnesses, as appropriate, to an independent
panel either in person or by teleconference.
9. Panel decision—The panel issues a written and reasoned decision that sets forth the
findings of fact and conclusions of law.
V I I . D o ’ s a n d D o n ’ t s
A P P E A L S
P R O C E S S :
V I S U A L I Z A T I O N
Debris Removal Emergency Protective
Measures
Permanent Work
Categories of Work Appeals
A P P E A L S
P R O C E S S :
V I S U A L I Z A T I O N
Most Common Appeal Reasons
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
F a c t o r s t o C o n s i d e r
Factors to Consider When Submitting an Appeal
• Time
• Costs
• Project Delays
• Potential Legal Remedies
A P P E A L S
P R O C E S S :
V I S U A L I Z A T I O N
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Denied Granted Partially Granted Rescinded Under Review
Total
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
W h a t t o I n c l u d e i n t h e A p p e a l ?
33April 14, 2016
When writing any Appeal, FEMA requires that the Appeal must:
• Contain documented justification supporting your position from the administrative
record (administrative record);
• Specify the monetary figure in dispute; AND
• Cite to the provisions in federal law or policy with which you believe the determination
was inconsistent.
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
S t a t u t e s & R e g u l a t i o n s
34April 14, 2016
What are the laws?
• Stafford Act, codified at 42 U.S.C. §§ 5121 et. seq.
• Chapters 2 and 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations
• Chapter 2 – Grants and Agreements
• Chapter 44 – Emergency Management and Assistance
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
S t a t u t e s & R e g u l a t i o n s
35April 14, 2016
Who makes these laws?
• The Stafford Act and amendments made to the Act, such as the Sandy Recovery
Improvement Act of 2013, are passed by Congress (statutes).
• The rules to receive and maintain government grants are written by the Office of
Management and Budget (regulation).
• The rules to implement the Stafford Act are written by FEMA (regulation).
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
P r e c e d e n c e
Precedent – An action or official decision that can be used as support for later actions
or decisions, especially a decided case that furnishes a basis for determining later cases
involving similar facts or issues.
36April 14, 2016
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
F E M A A p p e a l D a t a b a s e
What is the Appeals Database?
• Searchable Database
• Appeal Briefs
• Appeal Letters
• Appeal Analysis
• https://www.fema.gov/appeals
Using the Appeals Database to
formulating your appeal
• Determine what factors FEMA
reviewed during decision-making
• Look for regulatory citations
• Precedence; cite previous decisions
April 14, 2016 37
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
U n s u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l
Second Appeal Letter
FEMA-1692-DR
• Albany County
• Project Worksheet 2175
• Snow Removal
• 09/29/2008
38April 14, 2016
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
U n s u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l
1. Applicant used force account labor,
material, and equipment for general
roadway snow removal, sanding, and
salting.
2. FEMA determined the requested snow
removal costs were ineligible, because
the event was not declared as a snow,
or severe winter storm/snow
emergency.
3. First Appeal letter- Applicant states
that FEMA misapplied 44 CFR
§206.227
4. Applicant argues that the snow
removal activities lessened immediate
threats of significant additional
damage to improved public or private
property as eligible emergency
protective measures.
April 14, 2016 39
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
U n s u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l
5. Regional Administrator denied the
appeal because the State did not
request, and the President did not
include, snow removal costs in the
declaration.
6. Applicant submitted its Second
Appeal, reiterating that neither the
Stafford Act nor the Code of Federal
Regulations requires States to specify
emergency actions that it seeks
reimbursement for in the Governor's
request for a major disaster
declaration.
7. Applicant also asserts that FEMA
approved and funded PWs
for Category B, emergency protective
measures, for snow removal from
roads and rights-of-way in FEMA-
1665-DR-NY.
April 14, 2016 40
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
U n s u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l
8. FEMA Recovery Directorate
determines Regional Administrator's
decision in the First Appeal is
consistent with Public Assistance
regulations and policy & denies
Second Appeal.
9. Second Appeal denial letter references
44 CFR §206.227, Snow Assistance.
States that “Emergency or Major
Disaster declarations based on snow
or blizzard conditions will be made
only for cases of record or near record
snowstorms…”Response
10. Second Appeal denial letter references
Recovery Directorate Policy Number
9523.1,Snow Assistance, which states
that FEMA will provide limited
assistance for snow removal only
when the incident type is “snow”
or “snowfall.”
April 14, 2016 41
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
U n s u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l
11. DR-1692 = New York Severe Storms
and Inland and Coastal Flooding
12. Appeal Denied. Snow assistance is
not authorized for this type of
declaration.
April 14, 2016 42
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
S u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l
Second Appeal Letter
FEMA-1609-DR
• City of Fort Lauderdale
• PW02932
• Procurement
• 11/25/2015
April 14, 2016 43
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
S u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l
1. Hurricane Wilma struck South Florida
leaving substantial mixed storm debris
throughout the City of Fort
Lauderdale.
2. Applicant had a pre-existing contract
with Debris Removal Contractor and
subsequently initiated removal
operations.
3. To aid in the removal work, the
Applicant hired 17 additional
contractors under Time and Material
(T&M) contracts.
April 14, 2016 44
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
S u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l
4. FEMA prepared Project Worksheet
(PW) 2932 and obligated an estimated
$24,636,490.60 to complete the work.
5. U.S. Department of Homeland
Security’s Office of Inspector General
(OIG) found that the Applicant did not
follow proper procurement procedures
when awarding debris removal
contracts under T&M contracts.
6. In total, OIG recommended a
disallowance of $10,325,949.00. In
concurrence with OIG’s findings and
recommendations, FEMA deobligated
$10,325,949.00 of funding from PW.
April 14, 2016 45
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
S u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l
7. Applicant submitted its First Appeal.
Disputed $9,957,557.00 in disallowed
costs.
8. Applicant argued:
A. FEMA failed to prepare accurate
‘Narrative’ for Scope of Work.
B. Costs were reasonable to protect
public health, safety, & welfare.
C. T&M contract rates were
reasonable under the
circumstances.
9. FEMA Region IV Regional
Administrator (RA) denied the First
Appeal
10. Regional Administrator found:
A. Scope of Work language was not
general in nature;
B. 70 hour limit for T&M contracts were
greatly exceeded.
April 14, 2016 46
A P P E A L S P R O C E S S :
S u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l
11. Applicant’s Second Appeal letter to
FEMA argued:
A. Debris Removal contract and T&M
contracts stipulated a variety of
debris removal related services.
B. Debris removal rates were
reasonable compared to rates
claimed by applicants in
neighboring jurisdictions.
C. Debris removal rate pursuant to pre-
disaster contract and not indicative
of the higher rates typically
encountered following multiple
disaster events.
12. Appeal Results:
A. Provided sufficient documentation to
demonstrate that it performed
eligible debris removal within the
SOW.
B. Adequate documentation was
provided to substantiate the costs
incurred.
C. Adequately demonstrated that the
rate charged by its contractors were
reasonable when compared to rates
paid by similarly situated applicants
from surrounding jurisdictions
April 14, 2016 47
A P P E A L S
P R O C E S S :
S u c c e s s f u l
A p p e a l
13. FEMA reimbursed
$9,957,555.00.
48April 14, 2016
B e s t P r a c t i c e s
Communication
Supporting
Documentation
Arbitration
Time
Limitations
Cite
Regs.
Precedence
49April 14, 2016
Q u e s t i o n s ?
T H A N K Y O U

More Related Content

Similar to Appeals Presentation - TDEM Conference Final

Williamson CAD 2017 Protest Procedures
Williamson CAD 2017 Protest ProceduresWilliamson CAD 2017 Protest Procedures
Williamson CAD 2017 Protest Procedures
cutmytaxes
 
Ceq Annual Foia 2009 Report
Ceq Annual Foia 2009 ReportCeq Annual Foia 2009 Report
Ceq Annual Foia 2009 Report
Obama White House
 
The Planning Series 6 - Appeals
The Planning Series 6 - AppealsThe Planning Series 6 - Appeals
The Planning Series 6 - Appeals
Dr Georgette Kluiters
 
Wc intercompany arbitration
Wc intercompany arbitrationWc intercompany arbitration
Wc intercompany arbitration
cplacitella
 
CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT & Its RELEVANCE IN INDIA.ppt
CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT & Its RELEVANCE IN INDIA.pptCONSUMER PROTECTION ACT & Its RELEVANCE IN INDIA.ppt
CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT & Its RELEVANCE IN INDIA.ppt
Royal Dental College Library
 
Certificate of Relief from Disabilities
Certificate of Relief from DisabilitiesCertificate of Relief from Disabilities
Certificate of Relief from Disabilities
Todd Spodek
 
med mal presentation 7 10-18
med mal presentation 7 10-18med mal presentation 7 10-18
med mal presentation 7 10-18
Conrad Meyer JD MHA FACHE
 
Rac Audit Presentation- Select Data
Rac Audit Presentation- Select DataRac Audit Presentation- Select Data
Rac Audit Presentation- Select Data
RachelBuckleySelect
 
Racauditppupdated 140425130258-phpapp01
Racauditppupdated 140425130258-phpapp01Racauditppupdated 140425130258-phpapp01
Racauditppupdated 140425130258-phpapp01
SelectData
 
Administrative procedure
Administrative procedureAdministrative procedure
Administrative procedure
Mai Sar
 
The Changing Face of Background Checks
The Changing Face of Background ChecksThe Changing Face of Background Checks
The Changing Face of Background Checks
Snag
 
Railway Servant Discipline and Appeal Rules 1968
 Railway Servant Discipline and Appeal Rules 1968 Railway Servant Discipline and Appeal Rules 1968
Railway Servant Discipline and Appeal Rules 1968
Mohandas Poonthiyil
 
Redressal agencies in India
Redressal agencies in IndiaRedressal agencies in India
Redressal agencies in India
AJITESH PAL SINGH
 
D&ar latest 2014-2
D&ar latest 2014-2D&ar latest 2014-2
D&ar latest 2014-2
Mohandas Poonthiyil
 
Remedies on COA disallowance
Remedies on COA disallowanceRemedies on COA disallowance
Remedies on COA disallowance
cherry Marie Facun
 
Preserving Your Claim Under the Prision Litigation Reform Act (PLRA)
Preserving Your Claim Under the Prision Litigation Reform Act (PLRA)Preserving Your Claim Under the Prision Litigation Reform Act (PLRA)
Preserving Your Claim Under the Prision Litigation Reform Act (PLRA)
Pennsylvania Prison Society
 
Notice to Requester from governor's office
Notice to Requester from governor's officeNotice to Requester from governor's office
Notice to Requester from governor's office
Honolulu Civil Beat
 
25 Appeal Letters and Using PPACA For Today's Appeals
25 Appeal Letters and Using PPACA For Today's Appeals25 Appeal Letters and Using PPACA For Today's Appeals
25 Appeal Letters and Using PPACA For Today's Appeals
Tammy Tipton
 
Sunshine Act and other Laws Affecting Vendor Relations
Sunshine Act and other Laws Affecting Vendor RelationsSunshine Act and other Laws Affecting Vendor Relations
Sunshine Act and other Laws Affecting Vendor Relations
Holland & Hart LLP
 
Mass. court of appeals website info
Mass. court of appeals website   infoMass. court of appeals website   info
Mass. court of appeals website info
Umesh Heendeniya
 

Similar to Appeals Presentation - TDEM Conference Final (20)

Williamson CAD 2017 Protest Procedures
Williamson CAD 2017 Protest ProceduresWilliamson CAD 2017 Protest Procedures
Williamson CAD 2017 Protest Procedures
 
Ceq Annual Foia 2009 Report
Ceq Annual Foia 2009 ReportCeq Annual Foia 2009 Report
Ceq Annual Foia 2009 Report
 
The Planning Series 6 - Appeals
The Planning Series 6 - AppealsThe Planning Series 6 - Appeals
The Planning Series 6 - Appeals
 
Wc intercompany arbitration
Wc intercompany arbitrationWc intercompany arbitration
Wc intercompany arbitration
 
CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT & Its RELEVANCE IN INDIA.ppt
CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT & Its RELEVANCE IN INDIA.pptCONSUMER PROTECTION ACT & Its RELEVANCE IN INDIA.ppt
CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT & Its RELEVANCE IN INDIA.ppt
 
Certificate of Relief from Disabilities
Certificate of Relief from DisabilitiesCertificate of Relief from Disabilities
Certificate of Relief from Disabilities
 
med mal presentation 7 10-18
med mal presentation 7 10-18med mal presentation 7 10-18
med mal presentation 7 10-18
 
Rac Audit Presentation- Select Data
Rac Audit Presentation- Select DataRac Audit Presentation- Select Data
Rac Audit Presentation- Select Data
 
Racauditppupdated 140425130258-phpapp01
Racauditppupdated 140425130258-phpapp01Racauditppupdated 140425130258-phpapp01
Racauditppupdated 140425130258-phpapp01
 
Administrative procedure
Administrative procedureAdministrative procedure
Administrative procedure
 
The Changing Face of Background Checks
The Changing Face of Background ChecksThe Changing Face of Background Checks
The Changing Face of Background Checks
 
Railway Servant Discipline and Appeal Rules 1968
 Railway Servant Discipline and Appeal Rules 1968 Railway Servant Discipline and Appeal Rules 1968
Railway Servant Discipline and Appeal Rules 1968
 
Redressal agencies in India
Redressal agencies in IndiaRedressal agencies in India
Redressal agencies in India
 
D&ar latest 2014-2
D&ar latest 2014-2D&ar latest 2014-2
D&ar latest 2014-2
 
Remedies on COA disallowance
Remedies on COA disallowanceRemedies on COA disallowance
Remedies on COA disallowance
 
Preserving Your Claim Under the Prision Litigation Reform Act (PLRA)
Preserving Your Claim Under the Prision Litigation Reform Act (PLRA)Preserving Your Claim Under the Prision Litigation Reform Act (PLRA)
Preserving Your Claim Under the Prision Litigation Reform Act (PLRA)
 
Notice to Requester from governor's office
Notice to Requester from governor's officeNotice to Requester from governor's office
Notice to Requester from governor's office
 
25 Appeal Letters and Using PPACA For Today's Appeals
25 Appeal Letters and Using PPACA For Today's Appeals25 Appeal Letters and Using PPACA For Today's Appeals
25 Appeal Letters and Using PPACA For Today's Appeals
 
Sunshine Act and other Laws Affecting Vendor Relations
Sunshine Act and other Laws Affecting Vendor RelationsSunshine Act and other Laws Affecting Vendor Relations
Sunshine Act and other Laws Affecting Vendor Relations
 
Mass. court of appeals website info
Mass. court of appeals website   infoMass. court of appeals website   info
Mass. court of appeals website info
 

Appeals Presentation - TDEM Conference Final

  • 1. TDEM CONFERENCE 2016 F E M A P A : N A V I G A T I N G T H E A P P E A L S P R O C E S S
  • 2. I . I n t r o d u c t i o n s
  • 3. P r e s e n t e r s Zein Jivani Attorney at Law Sarah Lawrence Senior Consultant Roman Castillo Senior Consultant
  • 4. P r e s e n t a t i o n O v e r v i e w Today’s Presentation:  General Overview  Appeals Process  First Appeals  Second Appeals  Arbitration  Do’s and Don’ts  Questions
  • 5. I I . O v e r v i e w
  • 6. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : D e f i n i t i o n s Appeal – A proceeding undertaken to have a decision reconsidered by a higher authority, especially the submission of a lower court’s or agency’s decision to a higher court for review and possible reversal. Administrative Review – Review of an administrative proceeding within the agency itself. This presentation will focus on appeals process, procedure, and guidelines within the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Public Assistance Program.
  • 7. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : P u r p o s e o f A p p e a l Appeals Process • The FEMA appeals process is designed to "create an organized, consistent, and efficient system" for responding to Public Assistance Program disputes. • Process aims to ensure that applicants obtain accurate, fair, and well-reasoned eligibility determinations that are consistent with applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
  • 8. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : W h o M a y S u b m i t a n A p p e a l ? The Public Assistance Program appeal process is available to: • Applicants • Recipients • Subrecipients
  • 9. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : W h a t M a y I A p p e a l ? Subrecipients may appeal any FEMA determination related to an application for, or the provision of, assistance under the PA Program.  Stafford Act § 423, codified at 42 U.S.C. § 5189a  44 C.F.R. § § 206.206
  • 10. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : H o w M a y I A p p e a l ? Subrecipients must submit a written appeal to the Recipient (TDEM) within 60 days of receiving written notification of FEMA’s determination. • 44 CFR § 206.206(c)(1) TDEM must forward the appeal with its written recommendation to FEMA within 60 days of its receipt of the appeal. • 44 CFR § 206.206(c)(2) 9April 14, 2016
  • 11. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : W h a t M a y I A p p e a l ? Request for Public Assistance An Applicant’s first need to submit an Appeal may arise immediately following FEMA’s rejection of a Request for Public Assistance. 10April 14, 2016
  • 12. I I I . P r o c e s s
  • 13. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : A p p e a l s – S o m e t i m e s U n a v o i d a b l e The goal is to avoid Appeals altogether, but sometimes, Appeals are necessary and unavoidable. Common Appeals  Net Small Project Overrun appeal  Procurement (Emergency Procurements)  Reasonableness (Costs)  Cost Estimate/Scope of Work (PW writing) 12April 14, 2016
  • 14. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : A d m i n i s t r a t i v e R e v i e w You are entitled to two opportunities for Administrative Review: • FEMA Regional Administrator - 1st Appeal; and if necessary • Assistant Administrator for the Recovery Directorate at FEMA HQ - 2nd Appeal
  • 15. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : D i s p u t e R e s o l u t i o n P i l o t P r o g r a m In the future, Arbitration may be an option in Lieu of Second Appeals: • The Sandy Recovery Improvement Act, passed in 2013, established a dispute resolution pilot program that enabled applicants, in certain cases, to forgo a second appeal in favor of binding arbitration before an independent panel. • Pilot Program ended December 31, 2015. • Option not currently available to Applicants.
  • 16. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : D i s p u t e R e s o l u t i o n P i l o t P r o g r a m Arbitration Pilot Program :  Was available to Applicants that received a 1st Appeal Decision  Amount in dispute ≥ $1,031,000.00  Assistance pertains to disaster declaration after October 30, 2012.
  • 17. I V. F i r s t A p p e a l
  • 18. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : F i r s t A p p e a l First Appeal Process: • Filed by a Subrecipient with FEMA Regional Administration. • For Texas Subrecipients, the FEMA Regional Administration is Region VI. • Region VI oversees federal emergency management for Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas and 68 federally recognized Tribal Nations.
  • 19. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : W h a t H a p p e n s w i t h M y A p p e a l ? FEMA reviews Appeal and, within 90 days of receiving it, takes one of two actions: • Provides its final written decision to the Recipient; OR • Requests additional information specifying the date FEMA must receive the information (usually 30 days). • 44 CFR § 206.206(c)(3) 18April 14, 2016
  • 20. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : W h a t H a p p e n s w i t h M y A p p e a l ? First Appeal Process 1. Subrecipient disputes a FEMA Decision; 2. Subrecipient submits written Appeal to TDEM within 60 days of receipt of adverse decision; 3. TDEM forwards Appeal, supporting documentation, and TDEM’s recommendations to FEMA within 60 days of receipt of subrecipient’s appeal; 4. FEMA creates an administrative record for the Appeal; 5. FEMA may issue a Request for Information (30 day response time); 6. Regional Administrator issues a Decision to TDEM within 90 days of receiving all information necessary to make a decision; 7. TDEM transmits Decision to Subrecipient including information pertaining to Second Appeal rights. 19April 14, 2016
  • 21. V. S e c o n d A p p e a l
  • 22. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : S e c o n d A p p e a l Second Appeal:  2nd Appeal filed by a Subrecipient following FEMA Regional Administration’s First Appeal decision.  2nd Appeal is evaluated and decided by FEMA’s Assistant Administrator for the Recovery Directorate.  Mr. Alex Amparo is the Assistant Administrator of the Recovery Directorate at the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  • 23. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : W h a t H a p p e n s w i t h M y A p p e a l ? Second Appeal Process 1. Subrecipient disputes FEMA First Appeal Decision; 2. Subrecipient submits written Second Appeal to TDEM within 60 days of receipt of the First Appeal decision; 3. TDEM forwards the Second Appeal to the Regional Administrator; 4. The Regional Administrator forwards the Second Appeal to FEMA headquarters for review and decision; 5. FEMA may issue a Request for Information (30 day response time); 6. Assistant Administrator issues a Decision to TDEM within 90 days of receiving all information necessary to make a decision; 7. TDEM transmits Decision to Subrecipient. 22April 14, 2016
  • 24. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : R e c e n t C h a n g e s Important Policy Change • As of 04/07/14, it is no longer allowed or required to submit additional documentation with a Second Appeal. • The First Appeal package is the same package that will go to FEMA HQ for a Second Appeal. This is your administrative record. • First Appeal must include your regulatory justification. • FEMA could issue RFI on Second Appeal and provide an opportunity to submit further support, but it is not guaranteed.
  • 25. V I . A r b i t r a t i o n
  • 26. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : D i s p u t e R e s o l u t i o n P i l o t P r o g r a m Pilot Program Arbitration Process: 1. Request for arbitration submitted to FEMA and Recipient (TDEM) within 15 days of First Appeal decision. 2. Subrecipient has 60 days to submit Arbitration Statement of Claim. Arbitration Statement of Claim: Statement of Claim states the basis for the Applicant’s claim and the demand for relief.
  • 27. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : D i s p u t e R e s o l u t i o n P i l o t P r o g r a m Arbitration Process: 3. Administrative record—FEMA provides a copy of all the documents and materials directly or indirectly considered by the agency and relied upon in making the 1st appeal determination. 4. Appointment of Panel—An independent review panel consisting of three Administrative Law Judges. Applicant statement of claim—applicant provides a statement clarifying the disputed aspects of the 1st appeal determination and support for their claim. 5. FEMA response—FEMA provides a memorandum in support of its position and the name and address of its authorized representative.
  • 28. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : D i s p u t e R e s o l u t i o n P i l o t P r o g r a m Arbitration Process: 6. The administrative record will constitute the whole of the evidence that may be considered in order to make a determination on the claim. 7. Preliminary admin conference—provides opportunity to discuss the conduct of the hearing and answer procedural questions. 8. Hearing—presentation of positions and witnesses, as appropriate, to an independent panel either in person or by teleconference. 9. Panel decision—The panel issues a written and reasoned decision that sets forth the findings of fact and conclusions of law.
  • 29. V I I . D o ’ s a n d D o n ’ t s
  • 30. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : V I S U A L I Z A T I O N Debris Removal Emergency Protective Measures Permanent Work Categories of Work Appeals
  • 31. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : V I S U A L I Z A T I O N Most Common Appeal Reasons
  • 32. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : F a c t o r s t o C o n s i d e r Factors to Consider When Submitting an Appeal • Time • Costs • Project Delays • Potential Legal Remedies
  • 33. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : V I S U A L I Z A T I O N 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Denied Granted Partially Granted Rescinded Under Review Total
  • 34. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : W h a t t o I n c l u d e i n t h e A p p e a l ? 33April 14, 2016 When writing any Appeal, FEMA requires that the Appeal must: • Contain documented justification supporting your position from the administrative record (administrative record); • Specify the monetary figure in dispute; AND • Cite to the provisions in federal law or policy with which you believe the determination was inconsistent.
  • 35. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : S t a t u t e s & R e g u l a t i o n s 34April 14, 2016 What are the laws? • Stafford Act, codified at 42 U.S.C. §§ 5121 et. seq. • Chapters 2 and 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations • Chapter 2 – Grants and Agreements • Chapter 44 – Emergency Management and Assistance
  • 36. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : S t a t u t e s & R e g u l a t i o n s 35April 14, 2016 Who makes these laws? • The Stafford Act and amendments made to the Act, such as the Sandy Recovery Improvement Act of 2013, are passed by Congress (statutes). • The rules to receive and maintain government grants are written by the Office of Management and Budget (regulation). • The rules to implement the Stafford Act are written by FEMA (regulation).
  • 37. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : P r e c e d e n c e Precedent – An action or official decision that can be used as support for later actions or decisions, especially a decided case that furnishes a basis for determining later cases involving similar facts or issues. 36April 14, 2016
  • 38. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : F E M A A p p e a l D a t a b a s e What is the Appeals Database? • Searchable Database • Appeal Briefs • Appeal Letters • Appeal Analysis • https://www.fema.gov/appeals Using the Appeals Database to formulating your appeal • Determine what factors FEMA reviewed during decision-making • Look for regulatory citations • Precedence; cite previous decisions April 14, 2016 37
  • 39. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : U n s u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l Second Appeal Letter FEMA-1692-DR • Albany County • Project Worksheet 2175 • Snow Removal • 09/29/2008 38April 14, 2016
  • 40. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : U n s u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l 1. Applicant used force account labor, material, and equipment for general roadway snow removal, sanding, and salting. 2. FEMA determined the requested snow removal costs were ineligible, because the event was not declared as a snow, or severe winter storm/snow emergency. 3. First Appeal letter- Applicant states that FEMA misapplied 44 CFR §206.227 4. Applicant argues that the snow removal activities lessened immediate threats of significant additional damage to improved public or private property as eligible emergency protective measures. April 14, 2016 39
  • 41. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : U n s u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l 5. Regional Administrator denied the appeal because the State did not request, and the President did not include, snow removal costs in the declaration. 6. Applicant submitted its Second Appeal, reiterating that neither the Stafford Act nor the Code of Federal Regulations requires States to specify emergency actions that it seeks reimbursement for in the Governor's request for a major disaster declaration. 7. Applicant also asserts that FEMA approved and funded PWs for Category B, emergency protective measures, for snow removal from roads and rights-of-way in FEMA- 1665-DR-NY. April 14, 2016 40
  • 42. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : U n s u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l 8. FEMA Recovery Directorate determines Regional Administrator's decision in the First Appeal is consistent with Public Assistance regulations and policy & denies Second Appeal. 9. Second Appeal denial letter references 44 CFR §206.227, Snow Assistance. States that “Emergency or Major Disaster declarations based on snow or blizzard conditions will be made only for cases of record or near record snowstorms…”Response 10. Second Appeal denial letter references Recovery Directorate Policy Number 9523.1,Snow Assistance, which states that FEMA will provide limited assistance for snow removal only when the incident type is “snow” or “snowfall.” April 14, 2016 41
  • 43. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : U n s u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l 11. DR-1692 = New York Severe Storms and Inland and Coastal Flooding 12. Appeal Denied. Snow assistance is not authorized for this type of declaration. April 14, 2016 42
  • 44. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : S u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l Second Appeal Letter FEMA-1609-DR • City of Fort Lauderdale • PW02932 • Procurement • 11/25/2015 April 14, 2016 43
  • 45. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : S u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l 1. Hurricane Wilma struck South Florida leaving substantial mixed storm debris throughout the City of Fort Lauderdale. 2. Applicant had a pre-existing contract with Debris Removal Contractor and subsequently initiated removal operations. 3. To aid in the removal work, the Applicant hired 17 additional contractors under Time and Material (T&M) contracts. April 14, 2016 44
  • 46. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : S u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l 4. FEMA prepared Project Worksheet (PW) 2932 and obligated an estimated $24,636,490.60 to complete the work. 5. U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) found that the Applicant did not follow proper procurement procedures when awarding debris removal contracts under T&M contracts. 6. In total, OIG recommended a disallowance of $10,325,949.00. In concurrence with OIG’s findings and recommendations, FEMA deobligated $10,325,949.00 of funding from PW. April 14, 2016 45
  • 47. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : S u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l 7. Applicant submitted its First Appeal. Disputed $9,957,557.00 in disallowed costs. 8. Applicant argued: A. FEMA failed to prepare accurate ‘Narrative’ for Scope of Work. B. Costs were reasonable to protect public health, safety, & welfare. C. T&M contract rates were reasonable under the circumstances. 9. FEMA Region IV Regional Administrator (RA) denied the First Appeal 10. Regional Administrator found: A. Scope of Work language was not general in nature; B. 70 hour limit for T&M contracts were greatly exceeded. April 14, 2016 46
  • 48. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : S u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l 11. Applicant’s Second Appeal letter to FEMA argued: A. Debris Removal contract and T&M contracts stipulated a variety of debris removal related services. B. Debris removal rates were reasonable compared to rates claimed by applicants in neighboring jurisdictions. C. Debris removal rate pursuant to pre- disaster contract and not indicative of the higher rates typically encountered following multiple disaster events. 12. Appeal Results: A. Provided sufficient documentation to demonstrate that it performed eligible debris removal within the SOW. B. Adequate documentation was provided to substantiate the costs incurred. C. Adequately demonstrated that the rate charged by its contractors were reasonable when compared to rates paid by similarly situated applicants from surrounding jurisdictions April 14, 2016 47
  • 49. A P P E A L S P R O C E S S : S u c c e s s f u l A p p e a l 13. FEMA reimbursed $9,957,555.00. 48April 14, 2016
  • 50. B e s t P r a c t i c e s Communication Supporting Documentation Arbitration Time Limitations Cite Regs. Precedence 49April 14, 2016
  • 51. Q u e s t i o n s ?
  • 52. T H A N K Y O U

Editor's Notes

  1. Roman
  2. Roman
  3. Roman
  4. Zein
  5. Zein Source: Black’s Law Dictionary (10th ed. 2014)
  6. Zein Source: Recovery Directorate Directive - Public Assistance Program Appeals
  7. Zein
  8. Zein All applicants for federal disaster assistance are entitled to appeal any FEMA decision regarding eligibility for, or amount of, such assistance. - Recovery Directive Manual, Forward at 2.
  9. Zein
  10. Zein
  11. Sarah
  12. Sarah Net Small Project Overrun appeal Actual costs > FEMA Estimates Procurement (Emergency Procurements) Costs are disallowed due to improper procurement, however, you have documentation to prove exigency. Reasonableness (Costs) FEMA disallows costs b/c contract costs are too high. However, you have a solid argument to explain why your contract prices are reasonable given the circumstances. Cost Estimate/Scope of Work (PW writing)
  13. Sarah applicants for federal disaster assistance are entitled to appeal any FEMA decision regarding eligibility for, or amount of, such assistance. - Recovery Directive Manual, Forward at 2.
  14. Sarah 44 C.F.R. § § 206.210
  15. Sarah By statute, the pilot program is authorized through December 2015. Following the conclusion of the pilot program, the Comptroller General of the United States will issue a report to congress analyzing the effectiveness of the program. Source: http://www.fema.gov/sandy-recovery-improvement-act-2013 (RC)
  16. Roman
  17. Roman No hearing. It is all paper appeal.
  18. Roman
  19. Roman
  20. Roman
  21. Roman
  22. Roman
  23. Roman
  24. Zein
  25. Zein
  26. Zein Source: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-08-16/pdf/2013-19887.pdf (RC)
  27. Zein Source: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-08-16/pdf/2013-19887.pdf (RC)
  28. Sarah
  29. Sarah
  30. Sarah
  31. Sarah The Federal Government shall not be liable for any claim based upon the exercise or performance of or the failure to exercise or perform a discretionary function or duty on the part of a Federal agency or an employee of the Federal Government in carrying out the provisions of this chapter.  42 USC  § 5148. See St. Tammany Parish v. FEMA, 556 F.3d 307 (5th Cir. 2009) (dismissing case brought by grantee challenging FEMA’s denial of certain disaster aid based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction because decision to provide funds is a discretionary function); see also City of Laguna Niguel v. FEMA, No. 09-0198, 2009 WL 3122490, at *5 (C.D. Cal. Sept. 28, 2009) (concluding “the grant or denial of an application for federal assistance is a ‘discretionary function or duty’ under the Stafford Act for which the federal government’s actions are not subject to judicial review pursuant to sovereign immunity”). But see South Florida Water Management Dist. v. FEMA, No. 13-80533-CIV, 2014 WL 4805856, at *10 (S.D. Fla. Sept. 18, 2014) (concluding FEMA has no discretion to recover funds and thus sovereign immunity does not apply when 42 USC 5148 applies).
  32. Sarah
  33. Sarah & Zein Talking point - $ in question.
  34. Zein
  35. Zein
  36. Zein Insert flow chart for statute, regulation, precedence.
  37. Sarah
  38. Roman
  39. Roman
  40. Roman
  41. Roman
  42. Roman
  43. Zein
  44. Zein
  45. Zein
  46. Zein
  47. Zein
  48. Zein
  49. Roman
  50. Roman
  51. Roman