SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 34
Appeal Processes After Bill 139
As at January 26, 2018
Legislative Objectives
 Eliminate the Ontario Municipal Board, replace with Local Planning Appeal Tribunal
 New limits on Planning Act appeals
 Changes to conduct of appeal hearings – fewer and shorter hearings
 No change to process before Council
2
Planning Act Appeals – Official Plan
 Official Plan appeals can only be made on the basis that:
Part of the decision appealed is inconsistent with the provincial policy statement, fails to conform with or
conflicts with a provincial plan, fails to conform with the upper-tier plan
 No appeals on the basis of other valid planning issues if this test cannot be met, e.g.:
• Good planning
• Incompatibility
• Adverse impacts (e.g. traffic, wind, shadow, privacy)
 No appeals related to Major Transit Station Areas
• Identification
• Maximum densities
• Maximum heights – Planning Act ss. 17(36.1.4)-(36.1.7)
3
Planning Act Appeals – Official Plan – Minister’s
Decisions
 No appeal on Minister’s decision on official plans
• s. 17(34) – PA, s. 17(36.5)
• s. 26 – PA, s. 21.3
 Not even a municipality can appeal
• Loss of local planning autonomy
 No public process required
• Loss of transparency
4
Third Party Participation Under the Local Planning
Appeal Tribunal Act, 2017 (“LPATA”)
 A person wishing to participate in an appeal of an:
• Official plan
• Application to amend an official plan
• Zoning by-law
• Application to amend a zoning by-law
Must make a written submission to the Tribunal at least 30 days prior to a Case
Management Conference
 Submission must set out how the decision or failure to make a decision:
• was inconsistent with a Provincial Policy Statement
• fails to conform with or conflicts with a provincial plan
• fails to conform with an applicable official plan – s. 40(1)
5
Mediation
 An outcome of mandatory Case Management Conference
 Is possible for any matter before the Tribunal – s. 33(1)(5)
 Must be considered for Official Plan and ZBL matters – s. 39(2)
6
All Municipalities (Except Toronto)
Appeal Processes For
Site Plan Approval Appeal Process
Site Plan Approval
Application
No decision within 30 days
Appeal to LPAT (or Local
Appeal Body)
(not substantively changed by
Bill 139)
s. 41(12)
Applicant unsatisfied with
requirement(s) of the Site Plan
Application
Appeal to LPAT (or Local
Appeal Body)
(not substantively changed by
Bill 139)
s. 41(12)
8
Minor Variance Approval Appeal Process
Minor Variance
Application
Rejected by
Committee of
Adjustment
Appeal to LPAT
s. 45(12)
Dispute re.
conditions of
approval
Appeal to LPAT
s. 45(12)
9
Consent Approval Appeal Process
Consent
Application
Rejected by
Committee of
Adjustment
Appeal to LPAT
s. 53(19)
Dispute re.
conditions of
approval
Appeal to LPAT
s. 53(19)
Appeal changed
conditions
Appeal to LPAT
s. 53(27)
Failure to make a
decision within
90 days
Appeal to LPAT
s. 53(14)
10
Draft Plan of Subdivision Appeal Process
Draft Plan of Subdivision
Application
No decision on
application within 180
days
Appeal to LPAT
s. 51(34)
Case Management Appeal Hearing
Application Refused
Appeal to LPAT
(unchanged by Bill 139)
s. 51(39)
Dispute re. conditions of
approval
Appeal to LPAT
(unchanged by Bill 139)
s. 51(43)
11
Oral submissions only: no party
may adduce evidence or
call/examine witnesses
Official Plan/OPA Appeal Process
(No Decision by Approval Authority within 210 Days (s. 17(40))
Official Plan or Official Plan
Amendment adopted and sent
to approval authority for
decision
s. 17(31)
Appeal to LPAT for refusal or no
decision by approval authority
within 210 days
s. 17(40)
Appeal does not appear to be
substantively changed by Bill
139 – not limited to Conformity
Exercise and only one-stage
appeal
LPAT may
approve/modify/refuse on any
ground
s. 17(50)
12
Oral submissions only:
no party may adduce
evidence or
call/examine witnesses
13
OPA Appeal Process
(Refusal or Failure by Council to Adopt Amendment (s. 22(7))
Official Plan Amendment
application initiated by
private/third-party applicant
Appeal to LPAT for refusal or no
decision by adopting
municipality within 210 days
s. 22(7)
First appeal hearing at LPAT
Does OPA meet 2-Part
Conformity Test?
NO – No further appeal
s. 22(11.0.8)
YES – Application returned to
adopting municipality for
decision or new decision
s. 22(11.0.9)
Continued on next…
13
Oral submissions only:
no party may adduce
evidence or
call/examine witnesses
LPATA silent on whether parties
may adduce evidence and
call/examine witnesses
Municipality adopts OPA
within 90 days
s. 17(22)
Sent to approval authority
s. 17(31)
Approval
May be appealed pursuant
to s. 17(36), subject to s.
17(49.7)
Refusal
2nd LPAT Appeal
s. 17(36)
LPAT may modify or refuse
OPA if appealed decision
fails the Conformity Exercise
s. 17(49.7)
Municipality refuses OPA
again
s. 22(6.6)
2nd LPAT Appeal
ss. 22(7)
LPAT may approve, modify
or refuse if OPA meets the
2-Part Conformity Test
s. 22(11.0.15)
No Decision within 90 Days
2nd LPAT Appeal
ss. 22(7)
LPAT may approve, modify,
or refuse OPA on any ground
s. 22(11.0.14)
OPA Appeal Process
(Refusal or Failure by Council to Adopt Amendment (s. 22(7)) – Continued
14
LPATA silent on whether parties
may adduce evidence and
call/examine witnesses
Official Plan/OPA Appeal Process
(Refused/Approved by Approval Authority (s. 17(36))
15
OP or OPA (publicly or
privately-initiated) refused or
approved by approval
authority
1st Appeal to LPAT
s. 17(36)
Does appealed decision fail
the Conformity Exercise?
NO – Appeal dismissed
s. 17(49.1)
YES – OP/OPA returned to
adopting municipality for
second decision
s. 17(49.3)
Continued on next…
Oral submissions only: no party
may adduce evidence or
call/examine witnesses
Official Plan/OPA Appeal Process
(Refused/Approved by Approval Authority (s. 17(36)) - Continued
16
Municipality fails to adopt
OP/OPA within 90 days
s. 17(49.6)
If Private OPA
2nd appeal to LPAT
ss. 22(7)
LPAT may
approve/modify/refuse on
any ground
s. 22(11.0.14)
If Publicly-Initiated OP/OPA
No further appeal
Municipality adopts new
OP/OPA within 90 days
s. 17(49.6)
Sent to approval authority
s. 17(22)
Approval authority
decision to
approve/refuse
s. 17(35)
2nd LPAT appeal
s. 17(49.7)
Does appealed decision Fail
the Conformity Exercise?
YES – LPAT may modify
or refuse
NO – Appeal dismissed
s. 17(49.1)
No decision within 210
Days
s. 17(40)
2nd LPAT appeal
s. 17(40)
LPAT may
approve/modify/refuse
on any ground
s. 17(50)
Municipality refuses to
adopt OP/OPA
If Private OPA
2nd LPAT Appeal
ss. 22(7)
LPAT may
approve/modify/refuse if OPA
meets 2-Part Conformity Test
s. 22(11.0.15)
If Publicly-Initiated OP/OPA
No further appeal
Note: LPATA silent on whether
parties may adduce evidence and
call/examine witnesses in all of
these stages of appeal proceedings
Official Plan/OPA Appeal Process
(Adopted by Municipality and Exempt from Approval (s. 17(24))
17
OP or OPA adopted by a
municipality and exempt from
Approval
1st Appeal to LPAT
s. 17(24)
Does appealed decision fail the
Conformity Exercise?
NO – Appeal dismissed
s. 17(49.1)
YES – Application returned to
adopting municipality for
second decision
s. 17(49.3)
Continued on next…
Oral submissions only: no party
may adduce evidence or
call/examine witnesses
Official Plan/OPA Appeal Process
(Adopted by Municipality and Exempt from Approval (s. 17(24)) - Continued
18
Municipality fails to adopt
OP/OPA within 90 days
s. 17(49.6)
If Private OPA
2nd appeal to LPAT
ss. 22(7)
LPAT may
Approve/Modify/Refuse on
any ground
s. 22(11.0.14)
If Publicly-Initiated OP/OPA
No further appeal
Municipality adopts new
OP/OPA within 90 days
s. 17(49.6)
2nd LPAT Appeal
s. 17(49.7)
Does appealed decision fail
the Conformity Exercise?
YES – LPAT may modify or
refuse
NO – Appeal dismissed
s. 17(49.1)
Municipality refuses to adopt
OP/OPA
If Private OPA
2nd LPAT Appeal
ss. 22(7)
LPAT may
Approve/Modify/Refuse if
OPA Meets 2-Part Conformity
Test
s. 22(11.0.15)
If Publicly-Initiated OP/OPA
No further appeal
Note: LPATA silent on whether
parties may adduce evidence and
call/examine witnesses in all of
these stages of appeal proceedings
The Conformity Exercise (Municipal Decisions)
On appeal of an Official Plan or Official Plan Amendment where a
municipality or approval authority has made a decision to refuse or
approve, the LPAT can only consider whether the decision:
1. Is inconsistent with a provincial policy statement;
2. Fails to conform with or conflicts with a provincial plan; or
3. Fails to conform with the upper-tier municipality’s Official Plan (in the
case of a lower-tier municipality’s Official Plan)
19
2-Part Conformity Test (Official Plan Amendments)
On an appeal of a non-decision or refusal of an Official Plan Amendment,
the LPAT may only approve the requested Amendment if:
1. The existing part or parts of the Official Plan that would be affected by
the requested amendment are inconsistent with a Provincial Policy
Statement, fail to conform with a provincial plan, or, in the case of the
official plan of a lower-tier municipality, fail to conform with the upper-
tier municipality’s Official Plan; and
2. The requested amendment is consistent with Provincial Policy
Statements, conforms with or does not conflict with provincial plans
and conforms with upper-tier municipality’s Official Plan
20
Revised OPA on Consent of Specified Parties
 The LPAT must approve revised plans brought on the consent of
specified parties unless the revisions fail the Conformity Exercise –
s. 17(49.4)
21
Revised Plan on Consent
Revised Plan fails the
Conformity Exercise
New decision by the
Municipality
ss. 17(49.5), 22(11.0.11)
Appeal to LPAT
Revised Plan on Consent
Does the Revised Plan
meet the Conformity test?
YES – LPAT must approve
NO – LPAT can modify or
refuse
ss. 17(49.9), 22(11.0.17)
Specified parties are the municipality, the approval authority, the
Minister (if the Minister is a party), the applicant and all
appellants
Zoning By-Law Amendment Appeal Process
Appeal Passing of ZBLA - s. 34(19)
Zoning By-Law Passed
Appeal to LPAT
s. 34(19)
Does the ZBL fail the
Conformity Exercise?
NO – No further appeal
YES – Application returned
to Council for new
Decision
s. 34(26.2)(b)
ZBL Passed
2nd LPAT Appeal
s. 34(26.8)
LPAT may repeal or amend
ZBL if it fails the
Conformity Exercise
22
The Conformity Exercise (Municipal Decisions)
On appeal of a Zoning By-law or Zoning By-law Amendment, the LPAT
can only consider whether the decision:
1. Is inconsistent with a provincial policy statement;
2. Fails to conform with or conflicts with a provincial plan; or
3. Fails to conform with the upper-tier municipality’s Official Plan (in
the case of a lower-tier municipality’s Official Plan)
23
2-Part Conformity Test (Zoning By-law Amendments)
On an appeal of a non-decision or refusal of a Zoning By-law Amendment
application, the LPAT may only approve the requested Amendment if:
1. The existing part or parts of the zoning by-law that would be affected
by the requested amendment are inconsistent with a Provincial Policy
Statement, fail to conform with a provincial plan, or, in the case of the
Official Plan of a lower-tier municipality, fail to conform with the upper-
tier municipality’s Official Plan; AND
2. The requested amendment is consistent with Provincial Policy
Statements, conforms with or does not conflict with provincial plans
and conforms with upper-tier municipality’s Official Plan
24
Zoning By-Law Amendment Appeal Process
Appeal Refusal or Non-Decision of ZBLA - s. 34(11)
Zoning By-Law Refused or
Non-Decision
s. 34(11)
Appeal to LPAT
Does the proposed ZBL fail
the Conformity Exercise?
NO – No further appeal
s. 34(26)
YES – Application returned
to Municipality for new
Decision
s. 34(26.1)
ZBLA Approved – No
further appeal
No decision within 90 days
2nd LPAT Appeal
s. 34(11)
LPAT may amend ZBL on
any ground
s. 34(26.6)
Refusal
2nd LPAT Appeal
s. 34(11)
LPAT may amend ZBL if 2-
Part Conformity Test is
met
s. 34(26.7)
25
Note: s. 24(4), which normally deems zoning by-laws to conform with the applicable OP,
does not preclude appeals based on non-conformity – s. 34(26.13)
Revised Zoning By-law on Consent of Specified Parties
 The LPAT must approve revised zoning by-laws brought on the
consent of specified parties unless the revisions fail the Conformity
Exercise
26
Revised Zoning By-law on
Consent
Revised By-law fails the
Conformity Exercise
New decision by the
Municipality
Appeal to LPAT
Revised By-law on Consent
Does the Revised Plan meet the
Conformity test?
YES – LPAT must approve
NO – LPAT can modify or refuse
ss. 34(26.10)
Specified parties are the municipality, the Minister (if the
Minister is a party), the applicant and all appellants
The City of Toronto
Appeal Processes For
Appeal processes that are the
same as other cities:
 Official Plan Amendment
 Zoning By-Law Amendment
For these applications see the
appeal flowcharts for other cities.
For Site Plan, Minor Variance and
Consent appeal processes, read
on…
28
Toronto Appeal Process
Site Plan Approval Appeal Process
Site Plan Approval
Application
No decision within 30
days
Appeal to TLAB
(not otherwise changed
by Bill 139)
s. 41(12)
Applicant unsatisfied
with requirement(s) of
the Site Plan Application
Appeal to TLAB
(not otherwise changed
by Bill 139)
s. 41(12)
29
Minor Variance Approval Appeal Process
Minor Variance
Application
Rejected by Committee of Adjustment
Appeal to TLAB
s. 45(1)
Dispute re. conditions of approval
Appeal to TLAB
s. 45(1)
Expansion of legal non-conforming use
rejected
Appeal to TLAB
s. 45(2)(a)(i)
Reuse of land, building, or structure that
was legal non-conforming for more
compatible or permitted use rejected
Appeal to TLAB
s. 45(2)(a)(ii)
Use of land, building or structure
(generally defined) that conforms with
uses permitted in the bylaw rejected
Appeal to TLAB
s. 45(2)(b)
30
Consent Approval Appeal Process
Consent
Application
Rejected by
Committee of
Adjustment
Appeal to TLAB
s. 53(19)
Dispute re.
conditions of
approval
Appeal to TLAB
s. 53(19)
Dispute changed
conditions
Appeal to TLAB
s. 53(27)
No decision
within 90 days
Appeal to TLAB
s. 53(14)
31
Transition
 Royal assent – December 12, 2017
 Planning Act amendments come into effect on date of proclamation
• When?
• Best guess is April 1, 2018
32
Transition – Private Planning Applications
33
Complete Application Appeal Filed Regime
Before Royal Assent Before Royal Assent Pre- Bill 139
Before Royal Assent Between Royal Assent
and Proclamation
Pre- Bill 139
After Royal Assent Between Royal Assent
and Proclamation
Post-Bill 139
After Royal Assent After Proclamation Post-Bill 139
Thank You
Davies Howe
416.977.7088
www.davieshowe.com

More Related Content

Similar to Appeal Process after Bill 139

The Planning Series 10 - Environmental Impact Assessment
The Planning Series 10 - Environmental Impact AssessmentThe Planning Series 10 - Environmental Impact Assessment
The Planning Series 10 - Environmental Impact Assessment
Dr Georgette Kluiters
 
Haryana pollution control board
Haryana pollution control boardHaryana pollution control board
Haryana pollution control board
Dewesh Singh
 
140218 seminar feb_revised-syk
140218 seminar feb_revised-syk140218 seminar feb_revised-syk
140218 seminar feb_revised-syk
Sangyoon Kang
 
Objection form
Objection formObjection form
Objection form
Vanessa
 

Similar to Appeal Process after Bill 139 (20)

Public Sector Planning Club - 4 July 2019
Public Sector Planning Club - 4 July 2019Public Sector Planning Club - 4 July 2019
Public Sector Planning Club - 4 July 2019
 
City of Salina Brochure-The Zoning Process
City of Salina Brochure-The Zoning ProcessCity of Salina Brochure-The Zoning Process
City of Salina Brochure-The Zoning Process
 
Development Services Toolkit
Development Services ToolkitDevelopment Services Toolkit
Development Services Toolkit
 
Fast track merger
Fast track mergerFast track merger
Fast track merger
 
Sustainable Planning Act, Robert Milne
Sustainable Planning Act, Robert MilneSustainable Planning Act, Robert Milne
Sustainable Planning Act, Robert Milne
 
The Planning Series 10 - Environmental Impact Assessment
The Planning Series 10 - Environmental Impact AssessmentThe Planning Series 10 - Environmental Impact Assessment
The Planning Series 10 - Environmental Impact Assessment
 
R%20 case%20rules%20powerpoint%202015%20public
R%20 case%20rules%20powerpoint%202015%20publicR%20 case%20rules%20powerpoint%202015%20public
R%20 case%20rules%20powerpoint%202015%20public
 
Haryana pollution control board
Haryana pollution control boardHaryana pollution control board
Haryana pollution control board
 
Participation in the irish planning system
Participation in the irish planning systemParticipation in the irish planning system
Participation in the irish planning system
 
Planning and development club, Nottingham, November 2018
Planning and development club, Nottingham, November 2018Planning and development club, Nottingham, November 2018
Planning and development club, Nottingham, November 2018
 
England: The Planning System
England: The Planning SystemEngland: The Planning System
England: The Planning System
 
140218 seminar feb_revised-syk
140218 seminar feb_revised-syk140218 seminar feb_revised-syk
140218 seminar feb_revised-syk
 
WA Chapter event: Determinative forum
WA Chapter event: Determinative forumWA Chapter event: Determinative forum
WA Chapter event: Determinative forum
 
FMC Fall Real Estate Seminar 2011
FMC Fall Real Estate Seminar 2011FMC Fall Real Estate Seminar 2011
FMC Fall Real Estate Seminar 2011
 
PPT Item # 6 - Chapter 5 Bldg and Bldg Regulatins Amendments
PPT Item # 6 - Chapter 5 Bldg and Bldg Regulatins AmendmentsPPT Item # 6 - Chapter 5 Bldg and Bldg Regulatins Amendments
PPT Item # 6 - Chapter 5 Bldg and Bldg Regulatins Amendments
 
Objection form
Objection formObjection form
Objection form
 
Objection form
Objection formObjection form
Objection form
 
Items # 7&8 - PPT - 6400 Blk Broadway (Replat)
Items # 7&8 - PPT - 6400 Blk Broadway (Replat)Items # 7&8 - PPT - 6400 Blk Broadway (Replat)
Items # 7&8 - PPT - 6400 Blk Broadway (Replat)
 
Vested Rights in NC
Vested Rights in NCVested Rights in NC
Vested Rights in NC
 
OMB No More
OMB No MoreOMB No More
OMB No More
 

Recently uploaded

Termination of Employees under the Labor Code.pptx
Termination of Employees under the Labor Code.pptxTermination of Employees under the Labor Code.pptx
Termination of Employees under the Labor Code.pptx
BrV
 
一比一原版(MSU毕业证书)密苏里州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
一比一原版(MSU毕业证书)密苏里州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样一比一原版(MSU毕业证书)密苏里州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
一比一原版(MSU毕业证书)密苏里州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
mefyqyn
 
一比一原版(ASU毕业证书)亚利桑那州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
一比一原版(ASU毕业证书)亚利桑那州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样一比一原版(ASU毕业证书)亚利桑那州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
一比一原版(ASU毕业证书)亚利桑那州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
mefyqyn
 
一比一原版(UOL毕业证书)利物浦大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
一比一原版(UOL毕业证书)利物浦大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样一比一原版(UOL毕业证书)利物浦大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
一比一原版(UOL毕业证书)利物浦大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
mefyqyn
 
一比一原版(Indiana State毕业证书)印第安纳州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
一比一原版(Indiana State毕业证书)印第安纳州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样一比一原版(Indiana State毕业证书)印第安纳州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
一比一原版(Indiana State毕业证书)印第安纳州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
mefyqyn
 
一比一原版美国加州大学戴维斯分校毕业证(ucd毕业证书)学位证书仿制
一比一原版美国加州大学戴维斯分校毕业证(ucd毕业证书)学位证书仿制一比一原版美国加州大学戴维斯分校毕业证(ucd毕业证书)学位证书仿制
一比一原版美国加州大学戴维斯分校毕业证(ucd毕业证书)学位证书仿制
afukemk
 

Recently uploaded (20)

ORane M Cornish affidavit statement for New Britain court proving Wentworth'...
ORane M Cornish affidavit statement  for New Britain court proving Wentworth'...ORane M Cornish affidavit statement  for New Britain court proving Wentworth'...
ORane M Cornish affidavit statement for New Britain court proving Wentworth'...
 
Essential Components of an Effective HIPAA Safeguard Program
Essential Components of an Effective HIPAA Safeguard ProgramEssential Components of an Effective HIPAA Safeguard Program
Essential Components of an Effective HIPAA Safeguard Program
 
From Scratch to Strong: Introduction to Drafting of Criminal Cases and Applic...
From Scratch to Strong: Introduction to Drafting of Criminal Cases and Applic...From Scratch to Strong: Introduction to Drafting of Criminal Cases and Applic...
From Scratch to Strong: Introduction to Drafting of Criminal Cases and Applic...
 
IRDA role in Insurance sector in India .pptx
IRDA role in Insurance sector in India .pptxIRDA role in Insurance sector in India .pptx
IRDA role in Insurance sector in India .pptx
 
Skill Development in Law, Para Legal & other Fields and Export of Trained Man...
Skill Development in Law, Para Legal & other Fields and Export of Trained Man...Skill Development in Law, Para Legal & other Fields and Export of Trained Man...
Skill Development in Law, Para Legal & other Fields and Export of Trained Man...
 
Termination of Employees under the Labor Code.pptx
Termination of Employees under the Labor Code.pptxTermination of Employees under the Labor Code.pptx
Termination of Employees under the Labor Code.pptx
 
一比一原版(MSU毕业证书)密苏里州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
一比一原版(MSU毕业证书)密苏里州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样一比一原版(MSU毕业证书)密苏里州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
一比一原版(MSU毕业证书)密苏里州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
 
Petitioner Moot Memorial including Charges and Argument Advanced.docx
Petitioner Moot Memorial including Charges and Argument Advanced.docxPetitioner Moot Memorial including Charges and Argument Advanced.docx
Petitioner Moot Memorial including Charges and Argument Advanced.docx
 
Embed-1-1.pdfohediooieoiehohoiefoloeohefoi
Embed-1-1.pdfohediooieoiehohoiefoloeohefoiEmbed-1-1.pdfohediooieoiehohoiefoloeohefoi
Embed-1-1.pdfohediooieoiehohoiefoloeohefoi
 
一比一原版(ASU毕业证书)亚利桑那州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
一比一原版(ASU毕业证书)亚利桑那州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样一比一原版(ASU毕业证书)亚利桑那州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
一比一原版(ASU毕业证书)亚利桑那州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
 
HOW LAW FIRMS CAN SUPPORT MILITARY DIVORCE CASES
HOW LAW FIRMS CAN SUPPORT MILITARY DIVORCE CASESHOW LAW FIRMS CAN SUPPORT MILITARY DIVORCE CASES
HOW LAW FIRMS CAN SUPPORT MILITARY DIVORCE CASES
 
一比一原版(UOL毕业证书)利物浦大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
一比一原版(UOL毕业证书)利物浦大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样一比一原版(UOL毕业证书)利物浦大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
一比一原版(UOL毕业证书)利物浦大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
 
(Hamad khadam ) ENGLISH LEGAL 2.0.docx
(Hamad khadam )   ENGLISH LEGAL 2.0.docx(Hamad khadam )   ENGLISH LEGAL 2.0.docx
(Hamad khadam ) ENGLISH LEGAL 2.0.docx
 
CASE STYDY Lalman Shukla v Gauri Dutt BY MUKUL TYAGI.pptx
CASE STYDY Lalman Shukla v Gauri Dutt BY MUKUL TYAGI.pptxCASE STYDY Lalman Shukla v Gauri Dutt BY MUKUL TYAGI.pptx
CASE STYDY Lalman Shukla v Gauri Dutt BY MUKUL TYAGI.pptx
 
Bad Spaniel's Consumer Survey on the Use of Disclaimers
Bad Spaniel's Consumer Survey on the Use of DisclaimersBad Spaniel's Consumer Survey on the Use of Disclaimers
Bad Spaniel's Consumer Survey on the Use of Disclaimers
 
Dabholkar-matter-Judgement-1.pdfrefp;sdPp;
Dabholkar-matter-Judgement-1.pdfrefp;sdPp;Dabholkar-matter-Judgement-1.pdfrefp;sdPp;
Dabholkar-matter-Judgement-1.pdfrefp;sdPp;
 
TTD - PPT on social stock exchange.pptx Presentation
TTD - PPT on social stock exchange.pptx PresentationTTD - PPT on social stock exchange.pptx Presentation
TTD - PPT on social stock exchange.pptx Presentation
 
一比一原版(Indiana State毕业证书)印第安纳州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
一比一原版(Indiana State毕业证书)印第安纳州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样一比一原版(Indiana State毕业证书)印第安纳州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
一比一原版(Indiana State毕业证书)印第安纳州立大学毕业证成绩单原件一模一样
 
一比一原版美国加州大学戴维斯分校毕业证(ucd毕业证书)学位证书仿制
一比一原版美国加州大学戴维斯分校毕业证(ucd毕业证书)学位证书仿制一比一原版美国加州大学戴维斯分校毕业证(ucd毕业证书)学位证书仿制
一比一原版美国加州大学戴维斯分校毕业证(ucd毕业证书)学位证书仿制
 
How Can an Attorney Help With My Car Accident Claim?
How Can an Attorney Help With My Car Accident Claim?How Can an Attorney Help With My Car Accident Claim?
How Can an Attorney Help With My Car Accident Claim?
 

Appeal Process after Bill 139

  • 1. Appeal Processes After Bill 139 As at January 26, 2018
  • 2. Legislative Objectives  Eliminate the Ontario Municipal Board, replace with Local Planning Appeal Tribunal  New limits on Planning Act appeals  Changes to conduct of appeal hearings – fewer and shorter hearings  No change to process before Council 2
  • 3. Planning Act Appeals – Official Plan  Official Plan appeals can only be made on the basis that: Part of the decision appealed is inconsistent with the provincial policy statement, fails to conform with or conflicts with a provincial plan, fails to conform with the upper-tier plan  No appeals on the basis of other valid planning issues if this test cannot be met, e.g.: • Good planning • Incompatibility • Adverse impacts (e.g. traffic, wind, shadow, privacy)  No appeals related to Major Transit Station Areas • Identification • Maximum densities • Maximum heights – Planning Act ss. 17(36.1.4)-(36.1.7) 3
  • 4. Planning Act Appeals – Official Plan – Minister’s Decisions  No appeal on Minister’s decision on official plans • s. 17(34) – PA, s. 17(36.5) • s. 26 – PA, s. 21.3  Not even a municipality can appeal • Loss of local planning autonomy  No public process required • Loss of transparency 4
  • 5. Third Party Participation Under the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Act, 2017 (“LPATA”)  A person wishing to participate in an appeal of an: • Official plan • Application to amend an official plan • Zoning by-law • Application to amend a zoning by-law Must make a written submission to the Tribunal at least 30 days prior to a Case Management Conference  Submission must set out how the decision or failure to make a decision: • was inconsistent with a Provincial Policy Statement • fails to conform with or conflicts with a provincial plan • fails to conform with an applicable official plan – s. 40(1) 5
  • 6. Mediation  An outcome of mandatory Case Management Conference  Is possible for any matter before the Tribunal – s. 33(1)(5)  Must be considered for Official Plan and ZBL matters – s. 39(2) 6
  • 7. All Municipalities (Except Toronto) Appeal Processes For
  • 8. Site Plan Approval Appeal Process Site Plan Approval Application No decision within 30 days Appeal to LPAT (or Local Appeal Body) (not substantively changed by Bill 139) s. 41(12) Applicant unsatisfied with requirement(s) of the Site Plan Application Appeal to LPAT (or Local Appeal Body) (not substantively changed by Bill 139) s. 41(12) 8
  • 9. Minor Variance Approval Appeal Process Minor Variance Application Rejected by Committee of Adjustment Appeal to LPAT s. 45(12) Dispute re. conditions of approval Appeal to LPAT s. 45(12) 9
  • 10. Consent Approval Appeal Process Consent Application Rejected by Committee of Adjustment Appeal to LPAT s. 53(19) Dispute re. conditions of approval Appeal to LPAT s. 53(19) Appeal changed conditions Appeal to LPAT s. 53(27) Failure to make a decision within 90 days Appeal to LPAT s. 53(14) 10
  • 11. Draft Plan of Subdivision Appeal Process Draft Plan of Subdivision Application No decision on application within 180 days Appeal to LPAT s. 51(34) Case Management Appeal Hearing Application Refused Appeal to LPAT (unchanged by Bill 139) s. 51(39) Dispute re. conditions of approval Appeal to LPAT (unchanged by Bill 139) s. 51(43) 11 Oral submissions only: no party may adduce evidence or call/examine witnesses
  • 12. Official Plan/OPA Appeal Process (No Decision by Approval Authority within 210 Days (s. 17(40)) Official Plan or Official Plan Amendment adopted and sent to approval authority for decision s. 17(31) Appeal to LPAT for refusal or no decision by approval authority within 210 days s. 17(40) Appeal does not appear to be substantively changed by Bill 139 – not limited to Conformity Exercise and only one-stage appeal LPAT may approve/modify/refuse on any ground s. 17(50) 12 Oral submissions only: no party may adduce evidence or call/examine witnesses
  • 13. 13 OPA Appeal Process (Refusal or Failure by Council to Adopt Amendment (s. 22(7)) Official Plan Amendment application initiated by private/third-party applicant Appeal to LPAT for refusal or no decision by adopting municipality within 210 days s. 22(7) First appeal hearing at LPAT Does OPA meet 2-Part Conformity Test? NO – No further appeal s. 22(11.0.8) YES – Application returned to adopting municipality for decision or new decision s. 22(11.0.9) Continued on next… 13 Oral submissions only: no party may adduce evidence or call/examine witnesses
  • 14. LPATA silent on whether parties may adduce evidence and call/examine witnesses Municipality adopts OPA within 90 days s. 17(22) Sent to approval authority s. 17(31) Approval May be appealed pursuant to s. 17(36), subject to s. 17(49.7) Refusal 2nd LPAT Appeal s. 17(36) LPAT may modify or refuse OPA if appealed decision fails the Conformity Exercise s. 17(49.7) Municipality refuses OPA again s. 22(6.6) 2nd LPAT Appeal ss. 22(7) LPAT may approve, modify or refuse if OPA meets the 2-Part Conformity Test s. 22(11.0.15) No Decision within 90 Days 2nd LPAT Appeal ss. 22(7) LPAT may approve, modify, or refuse OPA on any ground s. 22(11.0.14) OPA Appeal Process (Refusal or Failure by Council to Adopt Amendment (s. 22(7)) – Continued 14 LPATA silent on whether parties may adduce evidence and call/examine witnesses
  • 15. Official Plan/OPA Appeal Process (Refused/Approved by Approval Authority (s. 17(36)) 15 OP or OPA (publicly or privately-initiated) refused or approved by approval authority 1st Appeal to LPAT s. 17(36) Does appealed decision fail the Conformity Exercise? NO – Appeal dismissed s. 17(49.1) YES – OP/OPA returned to adopting municipality for second decision s. 17(49.3) Continued on next… Oral submissions only: no party may adduce evidence or call/examine witnesses
  • 16. Official Plan/OPA Appeal Process (Refused/Approved by Approval Authority (s. 17(36)) - Continued 16 Municipality fails to adopt OP/OPA within 90 days s. 17(49.6) If Private OPA 2nd appeal to LPAT ss. 22(7) LPAT may approve/modify/refuse on any ground s. 22(11.0.14) If Publicly-Initiated OP/OPA No further appeal Municipality adopts new OP/OPA within 90 days s. 17(49.6) Sent to approval authority s. 17(22) Approval authority decision to approve/refuse s. 17(35) 2nd LPAT appeal s. 17(49.7) Does appealed decision Fail the Conformity Exercise? YES – LPAT may modify or refuse NO – Appeal dismissed s. 17(49.1) No decision within 210 Days s. 17(40) 2nd LPAT appeal s. 17(40) LPAT may approve/modify/refuse on any ground s. 17(50) Municipality refuses to adopt OP/OPA If Private OPA 2nd LPAT Appeal ss. 22(7) LPAT may approve/modify/refuse if OPA meets 2-Part Conformity Test s. 22(11.0.15) If Publicly-Initiated OP/OPA No further appeal Note: LPATA silent on whether parties may adduce evidence and call/examine witnesses in all of these stages of appeal proceedings
  • 17. Official Plan/OPA Appeal Process (Adopted by Municipality and Exempt from Approval (s. 17(24)) 17 OP or OPA adopted by a municipality and exempt from Approval 1st Appeal to LPAT s. 17(24) Does appealed decision fail the Conformity Exercise? NO – Appeal dismissed s. 17(49.1) YES – Application returned to adopting municipality for second decision s. 17(49.3) Continued on next… Oral submissions only: no party may adduce evidence or call/examine witnesses
  • 18. Official Plan/OPA Appeal Process (Adopted by Municipality and Exempt from Approval (s. 17(24)) - Continued 18 Municipality fails to adopt OP/OPA within 90 days s. 17(49.6) If Private OPA 2nd appeal to LPAT ss. 22(7) LPAT may Approve/Modify/Refuse on any ground s. 22(11.0.14) If Publicly-Initiated OP/OPA No further appeal Municipality adopts new OP/OPA within 90 days s. 17(49.6) 2nd LPAT Appeal s. 17(49.7) Does appealed decision fail the Conformity Exercise? YES – LPAT may modify or refuse NO – Appeal dismissed s. 17(49.1) Municipality refuses to adopt OP/OPA If Private OPA 2nd LPAT Appeal ss. 22(7) LPAT may Approve/Modify/Refuse if OPA Meets 2-Part Conformity Test s. 22(11.0.15) If Publicly-Initiated OP/OPA No further appeal Note: LPATA silent on whether parties may adduce evidence and call/examine witnesses in all of these stages of appeal proceedings
  • 19. The Conformity Exercise (Municipal Decisions) On appeal of an Official Plan or Official Plan Amendment where a municipality or approval authority has made a decision to refuse or approve, the LPAT can only consider whether the decision: 1. Is inconsistent with a provincial policy statement; 2. Fails to conform with or conflicts with a provincial plan; or 3. Fails to conform with the upper-tier municipality’s Official Plan (in the case of a lower-tier municipality’s Official Plan) 19
  • 20. 2-Part Conformity Test (Official Plan Amendments) On an appeal of a non-decision or refusal of an Official Plan Amendment, the LPAT may only approve the requested Amendment if: 1. The existing part or parts of the Official Plan that would be affected by the requested amendment are inconsistent with a Provincial Policy Statement, fail to conform with a provincial plan, or, in the case of the official plan of a lower-tier municipality, fail to conform with the upper- tier municipality’s Official Plan; and 2. The requested amendment is consistent with Provincial Policy Statements, conforms with or does not conflict with provincial plans and conforms with upper-tier municipality’s Official Plan 20
  • 21. Revised OPA on Consent of Specified Parties  The LPAT must approve revised plans brought on the consent of specified parties unless the revisions fail the Conformity Exercise – s. 17(49.4) 21 Revised Plan on Consent Revised Plan fails the Conformity Exercise New decision by the Municipality ss. 17(49.5), 22(11.0.11) Appeal to LPAT Revised Plan on Consent Does the Revised Plan meet the Conformity test? YES – LPAT must approve NO – LPAT can modify or refuse ss. 17(49.9), 22(11.0.17) Specified parties are the municipality, the approval authority, the Minister (if the Minister is a party), the applicant and all appellants
  • 22. Zoning By-Law Amendment Appeal Process Appeal Passing of ZBLA - s. 34(19) Zoning By-Law Passed Appeal to LPAT s. 34(19) Does the ZBL fail the Conformity Exercise? NO – No further appeal YES – Application returned to Council for new Decision s. 34(26.2)(b) ZBL Passed 2nd LPAT Appeal s. 34(26.8) LPAT may repeal or amend ZBL if it fails the Conformity Exercise 22
  • 23. The Conformity Exercise (Municipal Decisions) On appeal of a Zoning By-law or Zoning By-law Amendment, the LPAT can only consider whether the decision: 1. Is inconsistent with a provincial policy statement; 2. Fails to conform with or conflicts with a provincial plan; or 3. Fails to conform with the upper-tier municipality’s Official Plan (in the case of a lower-tier municipality’s Official Plan) 23
  • 24. 2-Part Conformity Test (Zoning By-law Amendments) On an appeal of a non-decision or refusal of a Zoning By-law Amendment application, the LPAT may only approve the requested Amendment if: 1. The existing part or parts of the zoning by-law that would be affected by the requested amendment are inconsistent with a Provincial Policy Statement, fail to conform with a provincial plan, or, in the case of the Official Plan of a lower-tier municipality, fail to conform with the upper- tier municipality’s Official Plan; AND 2. The requested amendment is consistent with Provincial Policy Statements, conforms with or does not conflict with provincial plans and conforms with upper-tier municipality’s Official Plan 24
  • 25. Zoning By-Law Amendment Appeal Process Appeal Refusal or Non-Decision of ZBLA - s. 34(11) Zoning By-Law Refused or Non-Decision s. 34(11) Appeal to LPAT Does the proposed ZBL fail the Conformity Exercise? NO – No further appeal s. 34(26) YES – Application returned to Municipality for new Decision s. 34(26.1) ZBLA Approved – No further appeal No decision within 90 days 2nd LPAT Appeal s. 34(11) LPAT may amend ZBL on any ground s. 34(26.6) Refusal 2nd LPAT Appeal s. 34(11) LPAT may amend ZBL if 2- Part Conformity Test is met s. 34(26.7) 25 Note: s. 24(4), which normally deems zoning by-laws to conform with the applicable OP, does not preclude appeals based on non-conformity – s. 34(26.13)
  • 26. Revised Zoning By-law on Consent of Specified Parties  The LPAT must approve revised zoning by-laws brought on the consent of specified parties unless the revisions fail the Conformity Exercise 26 Revised Zoning By-law on Consent Revised By-law fails the Conformity Exercise New decision by the Municipality Appeal to LPAT Revised By-law on Consent Does the Revised Plan meet the Conformity test? YES – LPAT must approve NO – LPAT can modify or refuse ss. 34(26.10) Specified parties are the municipality, the Minister (if the Minister is a party), the applicant and all appellants
  • 27. The City of Toronto Appeal Processes For
  • 28. Appeal processes that are the same as other cities:  Official Plan Amendment  Zoning By-Law Amendment For these applications see the appeal flowcharts for other cities. For Site Plan, Minor Variance and Consent appeal processes, read on… 28 Toronto Appeal Process
  • 29. Site Plan Approval Appeal Process Site Plan Approval Application No decision within 30 days Appeal to TLAB (not otherwise changed by Bill 139) s. 41(12) Applicant unsatisfied with requirement(s) of the Site Plan Application Appeal to TLAB (not otherwise changed by Bill 139) s. 41(12) 29
  • 30. Minor Variance Approval Appeal Process Minor Variance Application Rejected by Committee of Adjustment Appeal to TLAB s. 45(1) Dispute re. conditions of approval Appeal to TLAB s. 45(1) Expansion of legal non-conforming use rejected Appeal to TLAB s. 45(2)(a)(i) Reuse of land, building, or structure that was legal non-conforming for more compatible or permitted use rejected Appeal to TLAB s. 45(2)(a)(ii) Use of land, building or structure (generally defined) that conforms with uses permitted in the bylaw rejected Appeal to TLAB s. 45(2)(b) 30
  • 31. Consent Approval Appeal Process Consent Application Rejected by Committee of Adjustment Appeal to TLAB s. 53(19) Dispute re. conditions of approval Appeal to TLAB s. 53(19) Dispute changed conditions Appeal to TLAB s. 53(27) No decision within 90 days Appeal to TLAB s. 53(14) 31
  • 32. Transition  Royal assent – December 12, 2017  Planning Act amendments come into effect on date of proclamation • When? • Best guess is April 1, 2018 32
  • 33. Transition – Private Planning Applications 33 Complete Application Appeal Filed Regime Before Royal Assent Before Royal Assent Pre- Bill 139 Before Royal Assent Between Royal Assent and Proclamation Pre- Bill 139 After Royal Assent Between Royal Assent and Proclamation Post-Bill 139 After Royal Assent After Proclamation Post-Bill 139

Editor's Notes

  1. Ontario Municipal Board is continuing as the Tribunal – all references to OMB in legislation are deemed to be to the Tribunal Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction and can hear and determine questions of law or fact unless limited by Act; continues to have power to make incidental or necessary decisions, order conditions and make interim orders
  2. Concern that some of the amendments will undermine the Provincial Planning principles and objectives set out in various documents including GP Ignores matters of provincial interest set out in section 2 – could result in court challenges (could be added to appeal rights) Modern official plans are extremely detailed – broad policy but often also deal with details of neighbourhood by neighbourhood plans – things over which Provincila staff have no knowledge or expertise No transparent public hearing to support a thorough review of local matters challenged by individuals as OMB does now – Ministry review neither accessible or open contrary to one of the fundamental purposes of the Planning Act Will not result in more accessibility or less expense Not best/good planning Lack of conformity/consistency with provincial policies, plans and directions – broad visionary documents Burdens the appeals of private applications with a two part test – not only that the application conforms with provincial policies and plans and OPs but also no conform with provincial policies and plans – almost impossible to meet – to get approved in the first place they must conform (section 24 provides that a ZBL that comes into effect is conclusively deemed to conform to the OP) Concern that there are many considerations that ware relevant to land use planning that are not directly addressed by provincial policy or provincial plans – eg. Height, urban design, traffic, shadows, landscaping (often subject to mediation) - not necessarily engaged through consideration of provincial interests or official plan conformity particularly in an area or site specific concept) – limitation on scope of appeals effectively excludes these important localized planning matters from review
  3. Person other than an appellant, municipality or approval authority must request Doesn’t apply to non decision under section 17
  4. Offer the best opportunity for excellent outcomes at lower cost with less delay As drafted, Bill 139 will undermine those opportunities rather than strengthen them – proposed grounds of appeal have been so curtained that municipal officials or in some cases provincial officials can essentially dictate planning outcomes irrespective of impacts to individuals and fact based planning Little incentive to mediate if opinions of experts who wield influence in the planning process are sheltered from scrutiny Experts may opine and influence decision makers as they will – never be held accountable for a lack of rigour, fairness or balance through and appeal process No need to mediate if you can’t dictate