The document discusses the author's ancestry tracing results through mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) testing. Three tests were performed - on Hypervariable Region I, Hypervariable Region II, and a coding region single nucleotide polymorphism backbone test. The results identified the author's mtDNA haplogroup as I, which is found in approximately 2% of Europeans and traces back to a group called the Aurignacians that inhabited Europe approximately 30,000-40,000 years ago. The document provides background information on mtDNA, including its organization, mutation rate, and inheritance solely through the maternal line.
1) The document discusses ancient DNA evidence from Europe that shows three ancestral components - Western Hunter-Gatherer (WHG), Early European Farmer (EEF), and Ancient North Eurasian (ANE).
2) Analysis of ancient DNA from Mesolithic Europeans showed they carried Y-chromosome haplogroup I, while Neolithic farmers carried haplogroup G. Metal Age samples had more diversity including haplogroups R1b and R1a.
3) The data supports a model where WHG ancestry was most prominent in Northern Europeans, EEF ancestry increased towards the South, and ANE ancestry from Siberian populations entered the gene pool after the Neolithic, reaching highest levels in Northern Europeans.
This document discusses a study that found molecular and morphological evidence suggesting that the flagellate Ancyromonas is closely related to the common ancestor of metazoans, fungi, and choanoflagellates. Analyses of 18S rRNA gene sequences from major eukaryotic lineages using maximum likelihood, minimum evolution, and maximum parsimony supported Ancyromonas forming its own lineage, called Ancyromonadida, that is more closely related to opisthokonts than its nearest protist relatives. However, low bootstrap support for deep nodes limits the ability of 18S rDNA to fully resolve this aspect of eukaryotic phylogeny.
The study cloned and analyzed the GJB6 gene, which encodes the connexin 30 protein, from 16 bat species and 4 other mammals. Analysis showed purifying selection on GJB6 in mammals generally, maintaining its important role in hearing. One amino acid substitution was unique to bats, and 10 were shared among artiodactyls. The cytoplasmic loop and carboxy terminus were more variable than other domains in all mammals. The results demonstrate evolutionary conservation of GJB6 in mammals but also lineage-specific rapid evolution in some domains.
Hidden generic diversity in neotropical birds molecular and anatomical data s...herculanoalvarenga
This document presents molecular and anatomical data that supports establishing a new genus for the Scytalopus indigoticus species group, which is currently classified within the genus Scytalopus. Analyses of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences and anatomical features found strong evidence that Scytalopus is paraphyletic, with the S. indigoticus group forming a distinct clade separate from other Scytalopus species. The data supports elevating the S. indigoticus group to a new genus, questioning the presumed monophyly of the widely diverse genus Scytalopus. This highlights the importance of formally testing assumptions of monophyly, even for well-established bird groups.
A new species of porcupine, Coendou speratus, has been discovered in the Atlantic forest of northeastern Brazil. C. speratus is smaller than the similar species C. prehensilis and C. nycthemera. It has tricolored dorsal quills with brownish red tips, unlike the bicolored quills of C. nycthemera. Molecular and morphological analyses distinguish C. speratus as a unique species within the genus Coendou. The discovery adds to knowledge of the biodiversity of the important but threatened Atlantic forest ecosystem.
1) The document discusses ancient DNA evidence from Europe that shows three ancestral components - Western Hunter-Gatherer (WHG), Early European Farmer (EEF), and Ancient North Eurasian (ANE).
2) Analysis of ancient DNA from Mesolithic Europeans showed they carried Y-chromosome haplogroup I, while Neolithic farmers carried haplogroup G. Metal Age samples had more diversity including haplogroups R1b and R1a.
3) The data supports a model where WHG ancestry was most prominent in Northern Europeans, EEF ancestry increased towards the South, and ANE ancestry from Siberian populations entered the gene pool after the Neolithic, reaching highest levels in Northern Europeans.
This document discusses a study that found molecular and morphological evidence suggesting that the flagellate Ancyromonas is closely related to the common ancestor of metazoans, fungi, and choanoflagellates. Analyses of 18S rRNA gene sequences from major eukaryotic lineages using maximum likelihood, minimum evolution, and maximum parsimony supported Ancyromonas forming its own lineage, called Ancyromonadida, that is more closely related to opisthokonts than its nearest protist relatives. However, low bootstrap support for deep nodes limits the ability of 18S rDNA to fully resolve this aspect of eukaryotic phylogeny.
The study cloned and analyzed the GJB6 gene, which encodes the connexin 30 protein, from 16 bat species and 4 other mammals. Analysis showed purifying selection on GJB6 in mammals generally, maintaining its important role in hearing. One amino acid substitution was unique to bats, and 10 were shared among artiodactyls. The cytoplasmic loop and carboxy terminus were more variable than other domains in all mammals. The results demonstrate evolutionary conservation of GJB6 in mammals but also lineage-specific rapid evolution in some domains.
Hidden generic diversity in neotropical birds molecular and anatomical data s...herculanoalvarenga
This document presents molecular and anatomical data that supports establishing a new genus for the Scytalopus indigoticus species group, which is currently classified within the genus Scytalopus. Analyses of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences and anatomical features found strong evidence that Scytalopus is paraphyletic, with the S. indigoticus group forming a distinct clade separate from other Scytalopus species. The data supports elevating the S. indigoticus group to a new genus, questioning the presumed monophyly of the widely diverse genus Scytalopus. This highlights the importance of formally testing assumptions of monophyly, even for well-established bird groups.
A new species of porcupine, Coendou speratus, has been discovered in the Atlantic forest of northeastern Brazil. C. speratus is smaller than the similar species C. prehensilis and C. nycthemera. It has tricolored dorsal quills with brownish red tips, unlike the bicolored quills of C. nycthemera. Molecular and morphological analyses distinguish C. speratus as a unique species within the genus Coendou. The discovery adds to knowledge of the biodiversity of the important but threatened Atlantic forest ecosystem.
I investigated the assumption that race and ancestry can be determined using DNA sequence analysis. I was able to present the results of my senior project at Luther College Research Symposium in April 2010.
There are several theories on the origin and evolution of modern humans:
1. The multiregional evolution theory proposes that human evolution occurred within the widespread Homo sapiens species over the past 1.8 million years.
2. The hybrid-origin theory suggests genetic variations between human races resulted from interbreeding between at least two hominin species until the emergence of Homo sapiens sapiens around 35,000 years ago.
3. Fossil and genetic evidence from specimens like the Lapedo Child and Mungo Man challenge the single origin hypothesis and indicate interbreeding between anatomically modern humans and other hominin groups in Eurasia.
Mitochondrial DNA is used to study human population genetics and evolution. The document discusses two examples:
1) Analysis of mitochondrial DNA from 31 bone remains from the Taforalt cave in Morocco dated to 12,000 years ago found both Eurasian and North African components, showing genetic continuity with modern Moroccan populations.
2) Analysis of Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA found it to be distinct from modern human DNA, indicating Neanderthals were a separate species and did not directly contribute to the modern human gene pool.
This document discusses MELAS (Mitochondrial Encephalomyopathy with Lactic Acidosis and Stroke-like Episodes), a mitochondrial disease. MELAS is most commonly caused by the A3243G mutation and is maternally inherited. It is characterized by stroke-like episodes typically beginning in the teenage years, as well as other symptoms like diabetes, deafness, and cognitive impairment. Brain imaging during episodes shows cortical lesions. Muscle biopsies may reveal abnormal mitochondria clustering in blood vessels. There is currently no cure, but certain treatments can help manage symptoms.
Mitochondria generate most of a cell's ATP through oxidative phosphorylation. They contain their own genome separate from the nuclear genome. Mitochondria have a double membrane structure with the inner membrane forming folds called cristae. The mitochondrial genome is a circular DNA present in multiple copies that encodes proteins, rRNAs and tRNAs. Mitochondrial DNA is replicated, transcribed and the RNAs processed independently of the nuclear genome. Key processes involve the RNA polymerase, transcription factors and the DNA polymerase for replication. Mutations in mitochondrial DNA can cause human diseases.
Nanorobots have potential applications in heart surgery by removing blockages and tumor cells. Their movement in the body is affected by factors like viscosity, friction, non-rigidity, inertia, Peclet number, and Brownian motion at the nano scale. Nanorobots could perform heart surgery by being injected into the body, using sensors to locate plaque, grinding plaque into particles, and being removed from the body. While advantages include precision and minimal invasiveness, disadvantages include high costs and risk of going out of control. Nanorobots show promise for personalized treatment of conditions like heart attacks if design challenges can be addressed.
Replacement of bypass surgery by nanorobots 10mrudu5
Heart bypass surgery is performed to improve blood flow to the heart for those with severe coronary artery disease. Traditionally, one or more blocked arteries are bypassed using veins or arteries grafted from other parts of the body. Nanorobots could provide an alternative approach by entering the body through arteries and using diamond-tipped burrs to grind plaque buildup into particles, monitored by onboard cameras. This would eliminate the need for open-heart surgery while allowing precise treatment and removal of blockages. However, accurately controlling nanorobots within the body remains a major technical challenge.
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is small, circular, double-stranded DNA located in cell mitochondria. It is maternally inherited and does not recombine. mtDNA contains 37 genes essential for mitochondrial function and ATP production through oxidative phosphorylation. Compared to nuclear DNA, mtDNA evolves more rapidly, lacks introns, and is not bound in histones. Forensic analysis of mtDNA is useful when evidence is degraded or limited. Methods include DNA extraction, PCR amplification of mtDNA regions, sequencing, and comparing sequences to identify matches or mismatches. mtDNA analysis has applications in fisheries including individual identification, mixed stock analysis, and determining phylogenetic relationships between fish species.
This document discusses several inherited white matter diseases:
1. Metachromatic leukodystrophy is caused by a deficiency of the enzyme arylsulfatase A, leading to accumulation of sulfatides. MRI shows symmetric T2 hyperintensities in the periventricular and cerebellar white matter.
2. Krabbe disease is caused by a deficiency of galactocerebrosidase, leading to accumulation of galactocerebrosides. Characteristic MRI findings include T2 hyperintensities along the corticospinal tracts.
3. Mucopolysaccharidoses result from deficiencies of lysosomal enzymes involved in glycosaminoglycan breakdown, leading to their accumulation. MRI
Nanorobots are tiny machines that can be injected into the body to cure diseases. They are smaller than blood vessels and can navigate through the body using blood flow and ultrasonic positioning techniques. The nanorobots use sensors to detect issues like blockages, and then destroy fatty deposits or clots using special blades. Any damaged areas are then synthesized with new cells by the nanorobots. While this heart surgery technique using nanorobots would be less invasive and more accurate, the technology is still expensive to implement practically.
Mitochondrial diseases are caused by defects in mitochondrial structure or enzymes that result in deficient energy production. They can affect multiple organ systems and occur across all age groups. Mitochondrial DNA mutations can be inherited from the mother and nuclear DNA mutations can affect mitochondrial proteins or DNA maintenance. Common mitochondrial diseases include MELAS, MERRF, and Leigh syndrome. Mitochondrial dysfunction has also been implicated in aging and common diseases like heart disease and Parkinson's.
The document discusses biomaterials, bio-implants, and biomedical devices. It provides:
1) Definitions of biomaterials, bio-implants, and biomedical devices and how they interact with human tissue.
2) A brief history of the advancement of biomaterials and biomedical devices from ancient times to modern developments.
3) Classification of biomaterials into biological, synthetic, and composite categories and how they are evaluated.
This document outlines and provides examples of different phylogenetic tree construction methods, including UPGMA and neighbor joining. UPGMA assumes a constant mutation rate and joins clusters based on average distances. Neighbor joining does not assume a constant rate and finds the tree that best satisfies the four-point criterion of additive distances. The examples demonstrate the step-by-step process of applying these methods to distance matrices to build phylogenetic trees through an iterative clustering approach.
Bare-bones summaries of current research papers. Basic data, graphics and links only. News items to be fleshed out on tour. Part 1 addresses the genomic basis for understanding early humans in Franco-Iberia. We are at the peak of modeling ancient gene flow based on modern and 'fossil' DNA. Addressed is the genetic makeup of prehistoric modern humans Neandertals and Denisovans. Presentation generally follows publication order. Includes links to the original abstracts--the online papers usually lie behind a paywall.
William Golding imagined a prehistoric encounter between Neanderthals and our ancestors, Homo sapiens. In 1955, when he wrote the novel describing a preliterate society gradually exterminated by a more modern civilization, our understanding of this Stone Age encounter was sketchy. Scientists could not even say whether Homo sapiens sapiens had lived at the same time as Neanderthals, or instead were descended from them. But in the last 10 years, a much more complete picture has emerged of what happened--40,000 years ago--when the last two branches of the human family tree met, and one prevailed.
Neanderthals were not as primitive as they are often portrayed in popular culture. They were humans like us, and their brains were at least as big as ours. They were larger and stronger, and were successful hunters of big and small game. They probably even had language, which is generally thought to have arisen between 300,000 and 400,000 years ago. They were, in any case, anatomically capable of speech. Their stocky bodies are thought to have made them well adapted to the northern latitudes and glacial climates of Europe, where they lived for at least 300,000 years--far longer than we have.
Neanderthals were a species of archaic humans that inhabited Europe and parts of Asia between 600,000-40,000 years ago. They had shorter limbs than Homo sapiens but a more robust build adapted for cold climates. Dating methods like thermoluminescence, radiocarbon, and mass spectrometry on Neanderthal remains from sites like Saint-Césaire, Tabun, and Qafzeh indicate Neanderthals coexisted with early modern humans between 34,000-33,800 years ago, suggesting interaction was possible. While DNA and fossil evidence show Neanderthals were a separate species, it remains unclear if they directly interacted with or were replaced by H
innovative thinking assignment , regarding recombinant Dna technology. it is about how to bring back extinct life back from the dead in this 21st century using new technologies at our disposal!
Bio380 Human Evolution: Waking the deadMark Pallen
Bio380 Human Evolution, genes and genomes lecture on contribution of archaic populations to gene pool of anatomically modern humans, including Neanderthals and Denisovan
This article discusses the evolutionary relationships between mammals, their ancient relatives known as synapsids, and reptiles. It aims to clarify misunderstandings caused by outdated terms like "mammal-like reptiles". The article explains that evolutionary trees show synapsids like Dimetrodon are more closely related to mammals than reptiles, despite some superficial reptilian appearances. It also notes that non-mammalian synapsids displayed great diversity beyond a simple linear progression towards modern mammals. Key characteristics evolved at different times among synapsid subgroups.
This article discusses the evolutionary relationships between mammals, their ancient relatives known as synapsids, and reptiles. It aims to clarify misunderstandings caused by outdated terms like "mammal-like reptiles". The article explains that evolutionary trees show synapsids like Dimetrodon are more closely related to mammals than reptiles, despite some superficial reptilian appearances. It also notes that non-mammal synapsid diversity was much greater than often portrayed, and trees can help explain when mammalian traits evolved in relation to synapsid subgroups.
28 JANUARY 2011 VOL 331 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org 39.docxtamicawaysmith
28 JANUARY 2011 VOL 331 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org 392
NEWSFOCUS
New genomic data are settling an old
argument about how our species evolved
C
R
E
D
IT
S
:
M
A
X
P
L
A
N
C
K
I
N
S
T
IT
U
T
E
F
O
R
E
V
O
L
U
T
IO
N
A
R
Y
A
N
T
H
R
O
P
O
L
O
G
Y
FOR 27 YEARS, CHRIS STRINGER AND
Milford Wolpoff have been at odds about
where and how our species was born.
Stringer, a paleoanthropologist at the Nat-
ural History Museum in London, held that
modern humans came out of Africa, spread
around the world, and replaced, rather than
mated with, the archaic humans they met.
But Wolpoff, of the University of Michigan,
Ann Arbor, argued that a single, worldwide
species of human, including archaic forms
outside of Africa, met, mingled and had
offspring, and so produced Homo sapiens.
The battle has been long and
bitter: When reviewing a man-
uscript in the 1980s, Wolpoff
scribbled “Stringer’s desper-
ate argument” under a chart;
in a 1996 book, Stringer wrote
that “attention to inconvenient
details has never been part of
the Wolpoff style.” At one tense
meeting, the pair presented
opposing views in rival sessions
on the same day—and Wolpoff
didn’t invite Stringer to the
meeting’s press conference. “It
was diff icult for a long time,”
recalls Stringer.
Then, in the past year, geneticists an-
nounced the nearly complete nuclear
genomes of two different archaic humans:
Neandertals, and their enigmatic eastern
cousins from southern Siberia. These data
provide a much higher resolution view of
our past, much as a new telescope allows
astronomers to see farther back in time
in the universe. When compared with the
genomes of living people, the ancient
genomes allow anthropologists to thor-
oughly test the competing models of human
origins for the fi rst time.
The DNA data suggest not one but
at least two instances of interbreeding
between archaic and modern humans, rais-
ing the question of whether H. sapiens at that
point was a distinct species (see sidebar,
p. 394). And so they appear to refute the com-
plete replacement aspect of the Out of Africa
model. “[Modern humans] are certainly com-
ing out of Africa, but we’re fi nding evidence
of low levels of admixture wherever you
look,” says evolutionary geneticist Michael
Hammer of the University of Arizona in Tuc-
son. Stringer admits: “The story has undoubt-
edly got a whole lot more complicated.”
But the genomic data don’t prove the
classic multiregionalism model correct
either. They suggest only a small amount
of interbreeding, presumably at the margins
where invading moderns met archaic groups
that were the worldwide descendants of
H. erectus, the human ancestor that left
Africa 1.8 million years ago. “I have lately
taken to talking about the best model as
replacement with hybridization, … [or]
‘leaky replacement,’ ” says paleogeneticist
Svante Pääbo of ...
I investigated the assumption that race and ancestry can be determined using DNA sequence analysis. I was able to present the results of my senior project at Luther College Research Symposium in April 2010.
There are several theories on the origin and evolution of modern humans:
1. The multiregional evolution theory proposes that human evolution occurred within the widespread Homo sapiens species over the past 1.8 million years.
2. The hybrid-origin theory suggests genetic variations between human races resulted from interbreeding between at least two hominin species until the emergence of Homo sapiens sapiens around 35,000 years ago.
3. Fossil and genetic evidence from specimens like the Lapedo Child and Mungo Man challenge the single origin hypothesis and indicate interbreeding between anatomically modern humans and other hominin groups in Eurasia.
Mitochondrial DNA is used to study human population genetics and evolution. The document discusses two examples:
1) Analysis of mitochondrial DNA from 31 bone remains from the Taforalt cave in Morocco dated to 12,000 years ago found both Eurasian and North African components, showing genetic continuity with modern Moroccan populations.
2) Analysis of Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA found it to be distinct from modern human DNA, indicating Neanderthals were a separate species and did not directly contribute to the modern human gene pool.
This document discusses MELAS (Mitochondrial Encephalomyopathy with Lactic Acidosis and Stroke-like Episodes), a mitochondrial disease. MELAS is most commonly caused by the A3243G mutation and is maternally inherited. It is characterized by stroke-like episodes typically beginning in the teenage years, as well as other symptoms like diabetes, deafness, and cognitive impairment. Brain imaging during episodes shows cortical lesions. Muscle biopsies may reveal abnormal mitochondria clustering in blood vessels. There is currently no cure, but certain treatments can help manage symptoms.
Mitochondria generate most of a cell's ATP through oxidative phosphorylation. They contain their own genome separate from the nuclear genome. Mitochondria have a double membrane structure with the inner membrane forming folds called cristae. The mitochondrial genome is a circular DNA present in multiple copies that encodes proteins, rRNAs and tRNAs. Mitochondrial DNA is replicated, transcribed and the RNAs processed independently of the nuclear genome. Key processes involve the RNA polymerase, transcription factors and the DNA polymerase for replication. Mutations in mitochondrial DNA can cause human diseases.
Nanorobots have potential applications in heart surgery by removing blockages and tumor cells. Their movement in the body is affected by factors like viscosity, friction, non-rigidity, inertia, Peclet number, and Brownian motion at the nano scale. Nanorobots could perform heart surgery by being injected into the body, using sensors to locate plaque, grinding plaque into particles, and being removed from the body. While advantages include precision and minimal invasiveness, disadvantages include high costs and risk of going out of control. Nanorobots show promise for personalized treatment of conditions like heart attacks if design challenges can be addressed.
Replacement of bypass surgery by nanorobots 10mrudu5
Heart bypass surgery is performed to improve blood flow to the heart for those with severe coronary artery disease. Traditionally, one or more blocked arteries are bypassed using veins or arteries grafted from other parts of the body. Nanorobots could provide an alternative approach by entering the body through arteries and using diamond-tipped burrs to grind plaque buildup into particles, monitored by onboard cameras. This would eliminate the need for open-heart surgery while allowing precise treatment and removal of blockages. However, accurately controlling nanorobots within the body remains a major technical challenge.
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is small, circular, double-stranded DNA located in cell mitochondria. It is maternally inherited and does not recombine. mtDNA contains 37 genes essential for mitochondrial function and ATP production through oxidative phosphorylation. Compared to nuclear DNA, mtDNA evolves more rapidly, lacks introns, and is not bound in histones. Forensic analysis of mtDNA is useful when evidence is degraded or limited. Methods include DNA extraction, PCR amplification of mtDNA regions, sequencing, and comparing sequences to identify matches or mismatches. mtDNA analysis has applications in fisheries including individual identification, mixed stock analysis, and determining phylogenetic relationships between fish species.
This document discusses several inherited white matter diseases:
1. Metachromatic leukodystrophy is caused by a deficiency of the enzyme arylsulfatase A, leading to accumulation of sulfatides. MRI shows symmetric T2 hyperintensities in the periventricular and cerebellar white matter.
2. Krabbe disease is caused by a deficiency of galactocerebrosidase, leading to accumulation of galactocerebrosides. Characteristic MRI findings include T2 hyperintensities along the corticospinal tracts.
3. Mucopolysaccharidoses result from deficiencies of lysosomal enzymes involved in glycosaminoglycan breakdown, leading to their accumulation. MRI
Nanorobots are tiny machines that can be injected into the body to cure diseases. They are smaller than blood vessels and can navigate through the body using blood flow and ultrasonic positioning techniques. The nanorobots use sensors to detect issues like blockages, and then destroy fatty deposits or clots using special blades. Any damaged areas are then synthesized with new cells by the nanorobots. While this heart surgery technique using nanorobots would be less invasive and more accurate, the technology is still expensive to implement practically.
Mitochondrial diseases are caused by defects in mitochondrial structure or enzymes that result in deficient energy production. They can affect multiple organ systems and occur across all age groups. Mitochondrial DNA mutations can be inherited from the mother and nuclear DNA mutations can affect mitochondrial proteins or DNA maintenance. Common mitochondrial diseases include MELAS, MERRF, and Leigh syndrome. Mitochondrial dysfunction has also been implicated in aging and common diseases like heart disease and Parkinson's.
The document discusses biomaterials, bio-implants, and biomedical devices. It provides:
1) Definitions of biomaterials, bio-implants, and biomedical devices and how they interact with human tissue.
2) A brief history of the advancement of biomaterials and biomedical devices from ancient times to modern developments.
3) Classification of biomaterials into biological, synthetic, and composite categories and how they are evaluated.
This document outlines and provides examples of different phylogenetic tree construction methods, including UPGMA and neighbor joining. UPGMA assumes a constant mutation rate and joins clusters based on average distances. Neighbor joining does not assume a constant rate and finds the tree that best satisfies the four-point criterion of additive distances. The examples demonstrate the step-by-step process of applying these methods to distance matrices to build phylogenetic trees through an iterative clustering approach.
Bare-bones summaries of current research papers. Basic data, graphics and links only. News items to be fleshed out on tour. Part 1 addresses the genomic basis for understanding early humans in Franco-Iberia. We are at the peak of modeling ancient gene flow based on modern and 'fossil' DNA. Addressed is the genetic makeup of prehistoric modern humans Neandertals and Denisovans. Presentation generally follows publication order. Includes links to the original abstracts--the online papers usually lie behind a paywall.
William Golding imagined a prehistoric encounter between Neanderthals and our ancestors, Homo sapiens. In 1955, when he wrote the novel describing a preliterate society gradually exterminated by a more modern civilization, our understanding of this Stone Age encounter was sketchy. Scientists could not even say whether Homo sapiens sapiens had lived at the same time as Neanderthals, or instead were descended from them. But in the last 10 years, a much more complete picture has emerged of what happened--40,000 years ago--when the last two branches of the human family tree met, and one prevailed.
Neanderthals were not as primitive as they are often portrayed in popular culture. They were humans like us, and their brains were at least as big as ours. They were larger and stronger, and were successful hunters of big and small game. They probably even had language, which is generally thought to have arisen between 300,000 and 400,000 years ago. They were, in any case, anatomically capable of speech. Their stocky bodies are thought to have made them well adapted to the northern latitudes and glacial climates of Europe, where they lived for at least 300,000 years--far longer than we have.
Neanderthals were a species of archaic humans that inhabited Europe and parts of Asia between 600,000-40,000 years ago. They had shorter limbs than Homo sapiens but a more robust build adapted for cold climates. Dating methods like thermoluminescence, radiocarbon, and mass spectrometry on Neanderthal remains from sites like Saint-Césaire, Tabun, and Qafzeh indicate Neanderthals coexisted with early modern humans between 34,000-33,800 years ago, suggesting interaction was possible. While DNA and fossil evidence show Neanderthals were a separate species, it remains unclear if they directly interacted with or were replaced by H
innovative thinking assignment , regarding recombinant Dna technology. it is about how to bring back extinct life back from the dead in this 21st century using new technologies at our disposal!
Bio380 Human Evolution: Waking the deadMark Pallen
Bio380 Human Evolution, genes and genomes lecture on contribution of archaic populations to gene pool of anatomically modern humans, including Neanderthals and Denisovan
This article discusses the evolutionary relationships between mammals, their ancient relatives known as synapsids, and reptiles. It aims to clarify misunderstandings caused by outdated terms like "mammal-like reptiles". The article explains that evolutionary trees show synapsids like Dimetrodon are more closely related to mammals than reptiles, despite some superficial reptilian appearances. It also notes that non-mammalian synapsids displayed great diversity beyond a simple linear progression towards modern mammals. Key characteristics evolved at different times among synapsid subgroups.
This article discusses the evolutionary relationships between mammals, their ancient relatives known as synapsids, and reptiles. It aims to clarify misunderstandings caused by outdated terms like "mammal-like reptiles". The article explains that evolutionary trees show synapsids like Dimetrodon are more closely related to mammals than reptiles, despite some superficial reptilian appearances. It also notes that non-mammal synapsid diversity was much greater than often portrayed, and trees can help explain when mammalian traits evolved in relation to synapsid subgroups.
28 JANUARY 2011 VOL 331 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org 39.docxtamicawaysmith
28 JANUARY 2011 VOL 331 SCIENCE www.sciencemag.org 392
NEWSFOCUS
New genomic data are settling an old
argument about how our species evolved
C
R
E
D
IT
S
:
M
A
X
P
L
A
N
C
K
I
N
S
T
IT
U
T
E
F
O
R
E
V
O
L
U
T
IO
N
A
R
Y
A
N
T
H
R
O
P
O
L
O
G
Y
FOR 27 YEARS, CHRIS STRINGER AND
Milford Wolpoff have been at odds about
where and how our species was born.
Stringer, a paleoanthropologist at the Nat-
ural History Museum in London, held that
modern humans came out of Africa, spread
around the world, and replaced, rather than
mated with, the archaic humans they met.
But Wolpoff, of the University of Michigan,
Ann Arbor, argued that a single, worldwide
species of human, including archaic forms
outside of Africa, met, mingled and had
offspring, and so produced Homo sapiens.
The battle has been long and
bitter: When reviewing a man-
uscript in the 1980s, Wolpoff
scribbled “Stringer’s desper-
ate argument” under a chart;
in a 1996 book, Stringer wrote
that “attention to inconvenient
details has never been part of
the Wolpoff style.” At one tense
meeting, the pair presented
opposing views in rival sessions
on the same day—and Wolpoff
didn’t invite Stringer to the
meeting’s press conference. “It
was diff icult for a long time,”
recalls Stringer.
Then, in the past year, geneticists an-
nounced the nearly complete nuclear
genomes of two different archaic humans:
Neandertals, and their enigmatic eastern
cousins from southern Siberia. These data
provide a much higher resolution view of
our past, much as a new telescope allows
astronomers to see farther back in time
in the universe. When compared with the
genomes of living people, the ancient
genomes allow anthropologists to thor-
oughly test the competing models of human
origins for the fi rst time.
The DNA data suggest not one but
at least two instances of interbreeding
between archaic and modern humans, rais-
ing the question of whether H. sapiens at that
point was a distinct species (see sidebar,
p. 394). And so they appear to refute the com-
plete replacement aspect of the Out of Africa
model. “[Modern humans] are certainly com-
ing out of Africa, but we’re fi nding evidence
of low levels of admixture wherever you
look,” says evolutionary geneticist Michael
Hammer of the University of Arizona in Tuc-
son. Stringer admits: “The story has undoubt-
edly got a whole lot more complicated.”
But the genomic data don’t prove the
classic multiregionalism model correct
either. They suggest only a small amount
of interbreeding, presumably at the margins
where invading moderns met archaic groups
that were the worldwide descendants of
H. erectus, the human ancestor that left
Africa 1.8 million years ago. “I have lately
taken to talking about the best model as
replacement with hybridization, … [or]
‘leaky replacement,’ ” says paleogeneticist
Svante Pääbo of ...
The video discusses evidence that Neanderthals were not brutish or unintelligent, as popular myths suggest, but rather were a strong, intelligent, and adaptive human species. They developed weapons and tools, communicated within their clans, and mastered their environment, enabling them to survive for thousands of years. Specifically, the video notes Neanderthals created advanced stone tools and weapons, engaged in complex social behaviors within family groups, and adapted well to the cold climates they inhabited, surviving for over 300,000 years before ultimately going extinct.
The document discusses the journey of modern humans out of Africa from around 60,000 years ago based on genetic evidence. It describes how DNA markers on the Y chromosome and mitochondria can be traced back to populations in Africa, such as the San Bushmen in Botswana. These genetic markers were then mapped as people migrated through Central Asia, Siberia, Beringia into North America, and eventually all the way to the southern tip of South America over tens of thousands of years. The document examines how human populations adapted to different environments along the way and discusses the genetic connections between all living people today.
This document discusses arguments for and against evolution and creationism. It presents summaries of scientific studies and quotes from scientists on both sides of the debate. The main questions raised are how life originated, how diversity arose, and whether evolution is a scientifically proven theory or a philosophical belief. Criticisms of the fossil record and dating of DNA are mentioned. Overall the document aims to critically examine evidence for both evolution and intelligent design.
Home Read Sign inEXPLORATIONSCONTENTS Search in boSusanaFurman449
Home Read Sign in
EXPLORATIONS
CONTENTS
Search in book …
Private: Main Body
9. Early Hominins
Kerryn Warren, Ph.D., University of Cape Town
Lindsay Hunter, Ph.D., University of Witwatersrand
Navashni Naidoo, M.Sc., University of Cape Town
Silindokuhle Mavuso, M.Sc., University of Witwatersrand
Kimberleigh Tommy, M.Sc., University of Witwatersrand
Rosa Moll, M.Sc., University of Witwatersrand
Nomawethu Hlazo, M.Sc., University of Cape Town
Learning Objectives
De�ne what is meant by “hominin”.
Understand what is meant by “derived” and “primitive” traits and why this is relevant for understanding early
hominin evolution.
Understand changing paleoclimates and paleoenvironments during early human evolution, and contextualize
them as potential factors in�uencing adaptations during this time.
Describe the anatomical changes associated with bipedalism in early hominins and the implications for
changes in locomotion.
Describe the anatomical changes associated with dentition in early hominins and their implication for diet in
the Plio-Pleistocene.
Describe early hominin genera and species, including their currently understood dates and geographic ex-
panses and what we know about them. Previous: Primate Evolution
Next: Early Members of the Genus Homo
https://pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu/
https://pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu/explorationsbioanth
https://pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu/explorationsbioanth/front-matter/__unknown__/
https://pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu/explorationsbioanth/wp-login.php?redirect_to=https%3A%2F%2Fpressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu%2Fexplorationsbioanth%2Fchapter%2Fchapter-9-early-hominins-2%2F
https://pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu/explorationsbioanth/
https://pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu/explorationsbioanth/chapter/__unknown__-10/
https://pressbooks-dev.oer.hawaii.edu/explorationsbioanth/chapter/__unknown__-15/
Describe the earliest stone tool techno-complex and what it implies about the transition from early ho-
minins to our genus.
DEFINING HOMININS
It is through our study of our hominin ancestors and relatives that we are exposed to a world of “might have beens”: of
other paths not taken by our species, other ways of being human. But in order to better understand these different evolu-
tionary trajectories, we must �rst de�ne the terms we are using. If an imaginary line were drawn between ourselves and
our closest relatives, the great apes, bipedalism (or habitually walking upright on two feet) is where that line would be.
Hominin, then, means everyone on “our” side of the line: humans and all of our extinct bipedal ancestors and relatives
since our divergence from the last common ancestor (LCA) with chimpanzees.
Historic interpretations of our evolution, prior to our �nding of early hominin fossils, varied. Debates in the mid-1800s re-
garding hominin origins focused on two key issues:
���Where did we evolve?
���Which traits evolved �rst?
Charles Darwin hypothesized that we evolved ...
- A new hominin species, Homo naledi, was discovered in South Africa in a cave called Rising Star. It has a mix of traits, with hands and feet like Homo but more ape-like shoulders and a small brain.
- H. naledi appears to have deliberately buried its dead in the cave, a behavior previously only seen in modern humans. This suggests more advanced behavior than expected for a primitive species.
- The discovery adds a new branch to the human evolutionary tree and provides insights into human origins. However, more evidence is still needed to fully understand Homo naledi's traits and behavior.
1. The document discusses several historical mysteries that have been solved through advances in modern technology, including the Shroud of Turin, the remains of Anastasia Romanov, and Amelia Earhart's disappearance.
2. It also summarizes geneticist Spencer Wells' research which used DNA evidence to support the "single origin hypothesis" that all humans originated from ancestors in Africa around 60,000 years ago before migrating worldwide.
3. Additionally, it discusses how the Columbian Exchange dramatically changed global plant and animal life through the transference of species between the Old World and New World, with both benefits and consequences.
The document summarizes research that uses analysis of DNA polymorphisms on the non-recombining region of the Y chromosome to trace the dispersal of human populations. Key findings include:
- Analysis of Y chromosome polymorphisms in over 1,000 men from 52 populations identified 131 haplotypes and 10 haplogroups.
- Maximum parsimony analysis estimated the time to the most recent common ancestor of human Y chromosomes to be around 60,000 years ago.
- The geographic distribution of haplogroups provides insights into early human migration routes out of Africa and the colonization of the world.
This document summarizes four research projects happening at the University of Otago:
1) Dr. István Ábrahám is using a specialized microscope to observe the interactions between estrogen and brain cells affected by Alzheimer's disease in real time.
2) Professor Neil Gemmell's research on genetics of platypuses and marsupials helped determine that sex is determined differently in monotremes than other mammals.
3) Led by Daphne Lee, a team is studying well-preserved plant and animal fossils from 23 million years ago found in Otago to learn about the region's ancient climate and biodiversity.
4) Professor Jon Waters' research uses DNA analysis to discover
The earliest Neanderthals lived in Europe around 200,000 years ago but went extinct around 30,000 years ago as modern humans with more advanced brains and tools migrated out of Africa around 100,000 years ago. Neanderthals were muscular with large bones and brains, migrated as far as Siberia, hunted large game like bison and reindeer, and made tools from stone and bone. They began disappearing as the forests they relied on shrank and modern humans' superior abilities outcompeted them.
The Burgess Shale was discovered in 1909 in Canada and contains fossils over 500 million years old. It is one of the most important fossil formations because it preserves not just hard body parts but also soft tissues and organs, providing evidence that soft-bodied creatures lived at that time. Similar formations have been found around the world.
Similar to Ancestry Tracing with mtDNA 7.28.08 (20)
1. Ancestry Tracing With mtDNA
Organizational Diagram of Circular Mitochondrial DNA.
Note: every graphic in this paper is sourced from http://www.genebase.com/index.php
maintained by Genetrack
Lou Sheehan, Biology 215
July 28, 2008
Professor Dee M. Walter
2. ABSTRACT
This paper discusses the testing for the mtDNA haplogroup of one individual. The tests were
of Hypervariable Region I, Hypervariable Region II and of the Coding Region via an SNP
Backbone Test. The paper includes supporting discussions of the identified haplogroup – I –
and the nature of mitochondrial DNA.
INTRODUCTION
DNA provides a record of our biological past. The translation of this – if one will –
history book advances daily. One chapter in this book details our lineage.
Earlier in 2008 the author’s mitochondrial DNA (henceforth as: “mtDNA”) was tested.1
The Tests involved
(i) Hypervariable Regions I,
(ii) Hypervariable Region II, and an
(iii) mtDNA Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Marker (“SNP”) Backbone Test.
All testing was performed by Genetrack.
This paper will generally discuss the above-mentioned three tests. The results showed
the author’s mtDNA haplogroup to be “I”. There are 82
major haplogroups in Europe: H
(47%), J (17%), U (11%), T (9%), K (6%), X (6%), V (5%), and I (2%), all of which are
descendents of the haplogroup N. Each haplogroup is associated with a different ancestral
lineage. (Because of its small size, sometimes haplogroup I is not considered to be a
major European group.) (Fitzpatrick & Yeiser, 2005).
DISCUSSION
Haplogroup I
About 2.2% of Europeans are descendants of mtDNA haplogroup I. Haplogroup I is one
of the oldest groups to inhabit Western Europe arriving there during the Upper Paleolithic
period –-about 30,000 to 40, 000 years ago -- and today is referred to as the Aurignacian
culture; most others arrived in Europe tens of thousands of years later as the Ice Age was
1
Extensive testing was also done relating to the author’s Y chromosome – referred to herein as nDNA –
but the length of a paper discussing both the mtDNA and the nDNA would be far in excess of what was
assigned.
2
These numbers vary by source.
3. in retreat.3
The Aurignacians were the earliest known Cro-Magnon culture. This culture
was marked by certain tools and a pronounced artistic tradition. Aurignacian culture was
preceeeded by Mousterian culture, was contemporary with Perigordian culture, and was
succeeded by the Solutrean culture.
The Aurignacian culture was marked by a great diversification and specialization of
tools, including the invention of the “burin” – an engraving tool -- that made much of
the art possible. The Aurignacian differs from other Upper Paleolithic cultures mainly in
a preponderance of stone flake tools rather than blades. Flakes were retouched to make
nosed scrapers, ridged scrapers, and end scrapers. Bones and antlers were made into
points and awls by splitting, sawing, and smoothing.
Aurignacian art is said to represent the first complete tradition in the history of art. Cave
art was produced almost exclusively in Western Europe, where, by the end of the
Aurignacian Period, hundreds of paintings, engravings, and reliefs had been executed on
the walls, the ceilings, and sometimes the floors of limestone caves. Probably the first
paintings were stencilings outlined in color of actual hands held against the cave walls.
The stencilings were followed by the development of figural painting. A characteristic
feature of these early pictures, which persisted throughout the Aurignacian period, is their
“twisted perspective,” which shows, for example, the head of the animal in profile and its
horns twisted to a front view. Classic examples of Aurignacian art are the paintings of
animals, such as horses and bulls, on the walls and ceilings of the cave at Lascaux in
southwestern France. These figures were painted in vivid polychrome red, yellow,
brown, and black, with solid and closed outlines.
The earliest examples of small, portable art objects produced during this period consist of
pebbles with very simple engravings of animal forms. Subsequently, animal figures were
carved in pieces of bone and ivory. In the later part of the Aurignacian Period the
carvings show increased naturalism with foreshortening and shading with cross-hatched
lines. (Aurignacian culture. (2008). In Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved July 23, 2008,
3
During this time, approximately 70,000 BC to 10,000 BCE, a mile-deep ice sheet covered the northern
part of the continent from just north of London in England and west to the mainland covering all of
Scandinavia and Poland. The glaciers in the Alps would have grown tremendously as well, fanning out in
all directions to provide an ice cap covering the top of the entire boot of Italy. Sea levels were
approximately 130 yards lower than today, meaning some Mediterranean islands (as well as some Atlantic
islands such as the Azores and the Canaries) would have much greater landmass than today, and even
islands such as Malta were connected to the mainland, just as Britain and Ireland would have been.
Ice Age Euroasia was cold, with temperatures on average 8 to 12 degrees Centigrade cooler than today, and
much drier. The European treeline ran from the Bay of Biscay in Spain, across the very north of Italy and
over to the Sea of Azov, where it dipped southeast toward the border between Iran and Turkmenistan. In
between the tree line and the glacial line, the landscape would have been dry, covered with sand dunes and
tough, wiry grass, perhaps similar to some extent to terrain associated with Iceland and Northern Canada
today.
This grassy intermediate zone -- known as the Great Eurasian Plain -- would have served as a natural game
corridor, running all the way from eastern France to Korea. Great herds of game roamed this grassy
thoroughfare: wooly mammoths, antelopes, and, in particular, a number of species of bison.
4. from Encyclopædia Britannica Online:
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/43368/Aurignacian-culture; and
Time and Space The Archaeological Context. Retrieved July 23, 2008 from:
http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/arcnat/chauvet/en/espa2.htm).
Mitochondrial DNA
Organizational Display of Regions of MtDNA.
It is speculated that mitochondria were originally bacteria and were “engulfed” by and
developed a symbiotic relationship with other life forms living in their cellular
5. cytoplasm. Mitochondria provide their hosts with ATP in exchange for protection, etc.
Significantly, mitochondria have their own DNA i.e., their DNA is distinct from the
DNA (henceforth as nDNA for nuclear DNA) of their hosts. Mutations in mtDNA are
distinct from changes to the nDNA. 4
(Hart, 2002).
MtDNA mutates at a very slow rate -- over tens of generations -- and thus can be used to
glimpse the past.
MtDNA is understood to be inherited only from the mother. At conception, essentially
only the male sperm’s nucleus enters the female egg. In the case wherein male mtDNA
enters a female egg, human eggs are estimated to have as many as 100,000 mtDNA
molecules which would result in an extreme dilution. Yet more, the embryo’s cellular
machinery is able to identify any male mtDNA that has entered the egg and destroy it.
Thus, mothers pass along their mtDNA to their children and share similar mtDNA with
their siblings and maternal relatives and, as such, barring a contemporaneous mutation,
an individual’s mtDNA is not unique to him or her.5
(Gibson & Muse 2002).
When remains are old or badly degraded it is often difficult or impossible to extract
nDNA . However, mtDNA is present in much higher numbers than nDNA and so some
of it is more likely to remain testable. In short, while nDNA contains much more
information, there are only two copies (one paternal, one maternal) of it in each cell,
while mtDNA has a smaller amount of useful information but typically hundreds of
copies of that information in each cell; the use of mtDNA in this context simply reflects
its increased odds of not being destroyed.6
,7
(Goodwin & Linacre & Hadi, 2007).
MtDNA was first sequenced in 1981 from a European placenta which effort is referred to
as either the “Cambridge Reference Sequence” or as the “Anderson Sequence.” 8
4
MtDNA uses a slightly different code than nDNA. As examples:
(i) UGA in mtDNA codes for trytophan but is a stop codon in nDNA;
(ii) AUA in mtDNA codes for methionine whereas in nDNA it codes for isoleucine;
(iii) AGA and AGG both code for stops on mtDNA but code for arginine in nDNA.
(Goodwin, et al., 2007).
5
MtDNA has been one of the tools used (i) to identify the Vietnam Unknown Soldier, (ii) as part of the
process of identifying the Romanov family, (iii) to establish that Neanderthals were not direct ancestors of
modern humans, (iv) to discredit the claim of Anna Anderson Manahan to be the Russian Princess
Anastasia, and (v) to establish that Jesse James was indeed the person buried in his tomb. (Wells, 2003).
6
Both mtDNA’s circular structure and the encapsulation behind two walls further enhances the
survivability of mtDNA. (Gibson & Muse, 2002).
7
Interestingly, a portion of at least some humans’ chromosome 11 carries a portion of an mtDNA “control
region” reflecting an ancient transposition between mtDNA and nDNA. (Goodwin, et al., 2007).
8
Today the processes used 1981 – including the use of bovine sequences to fill in gaps – are referred to as
“rudimentary.” In 1999 the same placenta was resequenced with only 11 changes made to the 1981
standard (plus an additional 7 nucleotide positions actually related to rare polymorphisms), but most
6. On average, there are 4-5 copies of mtDNA per mitochondrion with a range of about 1 –
15 copies. Each cell typically contains hundreds of mitochondrion, with an estimated
average of about 500 per cell. (Gibson & Muse, 2002).
MtDNA exists as a circular structure. Typically, mtDNA has 16,569 9
base pairs (some
people have mutations).
MtDNA base pairs are counted clockwise.
Of these, 1,122 base pairs contain the origin of replication but do not control for any
other gene products. 15,447 of the 16,569 coding base pairs
importantly the two areas of primary focus – the HV1 and HV2 regions – were not adjusted. Actually, the
resequencing established there were only 16,568 base pairs but the numbering system keyed to 16,569 base
pairs was retained for the sake of reference consistency. However, it must be noted that some institutions
use different reference-systems -- one example is based on an African who had 16,571 base pairs -- so it is
necessary to be aware of the reference-system being used. (Goodwin, et al., 2007).
9
By way of contrast, human nDNA consists of somewhere between 49,530,000 to 247,200,000 bases.
(Wells, 2007.)
7. Relative size of the D-Loop (HV1 & HV2) vis-à-vis the Coding Region.
code for proteins; there are no introns and only a few noncoding base pairs. (Gibson &
Muse, 2002).
MtDNA has 37 genes that code for the products used in the oxidative phosphorylation
process, a.k.a. cellular energy production; 13 of these code for proteins, 22 for transfer
RNAs (tRNA) and 2 for ribosomal RNAs (rRNA). (Gibson & Muse, 2002).
The two mtDNA strands are designated as the “H” (heavy) and “L” (light) strands. The
H strand has a greater number of guanine nucleotides (the heaviest of the four different
nucleotides) than does the L strand. Replication begins in a non-coding region of the H
strand (the displacement loop/D-loop). 10
10
The D-Loop (HV1 & HV2) is considered a non-vital part of the mtDNA because it does not have an
immediately useful biological function. Thus, whenever a mutation occurs in this region the individual
does not die from the mutation and might survive and pass the mutation along to the next generation.
(Ridley, 2000).
8. Close up of the Hypervariable Regions.
The H strand encodes for 28 gene products and the L strand transcribes 8 tRNAs and an
enzyme known as “ND6.” (Gibson & Muse, 2002).
Because the D-loop region does not code for any functional cell processes, there are
significantly more polymorphisms between individuals in this region. Due to the larger
number of polymorphisms in this region, lineage tracing typically focuses on two coding
regions in the D-loop known as HV1 11
and HV2 (H is for “hypervariable”). (Gibson &
Muse, 2002).
MtDNA has fewer repair mechanisms than nDNA and, not surprisingly, mtDNA has
higher rates of mutation than does nDNA. Even more, mtDNA lacks proof-reading
mechanisms increasing the mutation rate vis-à-vis nDNA during replication. Hence, it is
estimated that mtDNA’s mutation rate is 10 (some sources say 6 to 17) times higher than
nDNA’s which has the effect of making the tracing of descent via mtDNA that much
easier (of course, there are many advantages and disadvantages to each of mtDNA and
nDNA for these purposes). (Gibson & Muse, 2002).
At first glance, complicating matters is the fact that because of the relatively high rate of
mtDNA mutation an individual might – probably does – have more than one mtDNA
type, i.e., with different mtDNA sequences; these different “types” can be located in
different cells, the same cell, and even in the same mitochondrion! However, often these
11
Sometimes as HVR1 & HVR2; HVS1 & HVS2; or HVI & HVII.
9. mutations are found in very low numbers; it is rare to find more than one position so
mutated out of the nucleotides sequenced at HV1 and HV2 and, even more, “hotspots”
for such mutations at HV1 and HV2 have been identified. (Goodwin, et al., 2007).
A standard mtDNA analysis involves polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of
nine overlapping fragments followed by sequence analysis/digestion of 12-14 restriction
enzymes in the HV1 and HV2 regions. The results are then compared to the Cambridge
Reference Sequence. The estimate is that the sequences in these two areas vary by 1 to 2
percent between unrelated individuals; typically, these mutations are found in two
particular “hotspots” in the two HV regions. (Goodwin, et al., 2007).
A weakness with the use of mtDNA is that some haplogroups 12
are common within some
populations. An example is an FBI study of 1655 Caucasians of whom 168 (a little over
10%) would not be “excluded” as possibly related! Hence, increasingly, SNP Marker
Haplogroup Backbone Tests are being used. It should be noted that to sequence all
16,569 base pairs provides a 12-fold increase in the ability to differentiate such otherwise
common haplogroups. (Goodwin, et al., 2007).
Even given all of the above, it must be remembered that the further one goes back in any
such tracings, ever more extrapolations (educated guesses) of expected rates of mutations
are used to “connect the dots.”
10. HV1 Test
The HV1 Test is the most informative mtDNA test 13
as:
1. The HV1 region contains an abundance of markers.
2. The HV1 region is easy to test. All 520 nucleotides in the entire HV1 region can be
read from a single test.
3. The HV1 region is well studied. Thus, there is more scientific data available for
markers in the HV1 region than any other region of the mtDNA.
All of the other test types serve to supplement the results of the HVR1 test. (Smolenyak
Smolenyak & Turner, 2004).
***** ***** ***** ***** ***** ***** ***** ***** ***** ****
This mutation is documented as follows:
* Location: 40
* Nucleotide Change: T>G.
***** ***** ***** ***** ***** ***** ***** ***** ***** ****
13
The HV1 test uses “DNA sequencing” technology to read all of the nucleotides from locations 16,001 to
16,520 (the entire HV1 region).
11. HV1 Sequence of Louis Sheehan (Location 16001 to 16520) compared to
the CRS:
16001
ATTCTAATTT AAACTATTCT CTGTTCTTTC ATGGGGAAGC AGATTTGGGT
16051
ACCACCCAAG TATTGACTCA CCCgTCAACA ACCGCTATGT ATyTCGTACA
16101
TTACTGCCAG CCACCATGAA TATTGTACaG TACCATAAAT ACTTaACCAC
16151
CTGTAGTACA TAAAAACCCA ATCCACATCA AAACCCCCTC CCCATGCTTA
16201
CAAGCAAGTA CAGCAATCAA CCtTCAACTA TCACACATCA ACTGCAACTC
16251
CAAAGCCACC CCTCACCCAC TAGGATACCA ACAAACCTAC CCACCCTTAA
16301
CAGTACATAG TACATAAAGC CATTTACCGT ACATAGCACA TTACAGTCAA
16351
ATCCCTTCTt GTCCCCATGG ATGACCCCCC TCAGATAGGG aTCCCTTGAC
16401
CACCATCCTC CGTGAAATCA ATATCCCGCA CAAGAGTGCT ACTCTCCTCG
16451
CTCCGGGCCC ATAACACTTG GGGGTAGCTA AAGTGAACTG TATCCGACAT
16501
CTGGTTCCTA CTTCAGGGcC
Location Mutation Type 14
Nucleotide
16074 HV1 Substitution A > g
16093 HV1 Substitution T > y
16129 HV1 Substitution G > a
16145 HV1 Substitution G > a
16223 HV1 Substitution C > t
16360 HV1 Substitution C > t
16391 HV1 Substitution G > a
16519 HV1 Substitution T > c
A total of 8 mutations.
14
Substitution - occurs with a nucleotide changes.
Deletion - occurs when a nucleotide is removed from the sequence, therefore changing the overall
sequence.
Insertion - occurs when a nucleotide is added to the sequence, therefore changing the overall sequence.
12. HV2 Test
The HV2 region spans positions 1 to 400. Like HV1, HV2 contains an abundance of
markers that are useful for tracing maternal ancestry.
The HV2 test 15
supplements the HV1 results as it allows more stringent and precise
results for any comparison. For example, in cases where people are matching exactly at
the HV1 region, further comparison of the HV2 region provides greater resolution.
(Rodden Robinson, 2005).
HV2 Sequence of Louis Sheehan (Location 1 to 400) compared to the
CRS:
1
GATCACAGGT CTATCACCCT ATTAACCACT CACGGGAGCT CTCCATGCAT
51
TTGGTATTTT CGTCTGGGGG GTgTGCACGC GATAGCATTG CGAGACGCTG
101
GAGCCGGAGC ACCCTATGTC GCAGTATCTG TCTTTGATTC CTGCCTCATC
151
CcATTATTTA TCGCACCTAC GTTCAATATT ACAGGCGAAC ATACTTACcA
201
AAGcGTaTTA ATTAATTAAT GCTTGTAGGA CATAATAATA ACAATTGAAc
251
GTCTGCACAG CCgCTTTCCA CACAGACATC ATAACAAAAA ATTTCCACCA
301
AACCCCCCNc CCCCCNCTTN TGGNCNCANC ACTTAAANNC ATNTNTGCCA
351
AACCCCAAAA ANAAANAANC CTAANACCNG CCTAACCANA TTTNAAATTT
Location Mutation Type Nucleotide
73 HV2 Substitution A > g
152 HV2 Substitution T > c
199 HV2 Substitution T > c
204 HV2 Substitution T > c
207 HV2 Substitution G > a
250 HV2 Substitution T > c
263 HV2 Substitution A > g
310 HV2 Substitution T > c
A total of 8 mutations.
15
The HV2 test also uses “DNA sequencing” technology. This test reads all of the nucleotides from
locations 1 to 400 (the entire region) of the mtDNA.
13. Single Nucleotide Polymorphism Marker (“SNP”) Haplogroup
Backbone Test 16
, 17
, 18
, 19
16
There is also a SNP Subclade Test which examines a special panel of markers in the Coding Region of
the mtDNA allowing determination of one’s “sub-clade.” However, at the moment, SNP Subclade tests are
available only for the following mtDNA Haplogroups: R, M, H.
17
The 20 markers that are included in this test and the haplogroups they define are:
SNP Location Mutations Haplogroups
2352 T > C L1b, L3e, U6b1
3594 C > T L0, L1, L2, L5
3693 G > A L1b, L2d
4312 C > T L0
4580 G > A V
4833 A > G G
5178 C > A
C > T D
7028 C > T H
7055 A > C
A > G L1
7598 G > A E
8618 T > C L3d
10086 A > G L3b
10310 G > A F
10400 C > T C, D, E, G, M, Q, Z
10873 T > C C, D, E, G, L, M, Q, Z
11251 A > G JT, J, T
11719 G > A Pre-HV, HV
12308 A > G K, U
12705 C > T B, F, H, J, K, P, T, R, U, V
14766 C > T HV
18
As each sequencing reaction can only test approximately 500 nucleotides at a time, many reactions
would be required in order to sequence (“DNA Sequencing”) the entire Coding Region, thus making it
costly. Also, there are very few mutations in the Coding Region, making it unnecessary to sequence every
single nucleotide in the Coding Region. As such, a process other than “DNA Sequencing” is used wherein
20 specific Coding Region markers are tested.
19
The Coding Region of the mtDNA is considered essential for the survival of the individual, so typically
whenever a mutation occurs in this region it is often lethal and the individual dies. Thus, mutations which
14. While the markers in the HV1 and HV2 Regions can be easily detected by sequencing,
the Coding Region is large, making sequencing (currently) impractical. The SNP
Haplogroup Backbone Test is a panel of 20 markers in the Coding Region which are
specific for haplogroup determination. (Fitzpatrick, 2005).
occur in the Coding Region are usually not passed down to future generations. For this reason, over a
period of thousands of years, many mutations accumulate in the D-Loop (HV1 & HV2), but few are found
in the Coding Region. (Olson, 2002).
15. SNP Backbone Test of Louis Sheehan:
SNP Location Mutations 20
SNP Identity Mutation
2352 T > C
T Negative
3594 C > T
C Negative
3693 G > A
G Negative
4312 C > T
C Negative
4580 G > A
G Negative
4833 A > G
A Negative
5178 C > A
C > T
C Negative
7028 C > T
T Positive
7055 A > C
A > G
A Negative
7598 G > A
G Negative
8618 T > C
T Negative
10086 A > G
A Negative
10310 G > A
G Negative
10400 C > T
C Negative
10873 T > C
T Negative
11251 A > G
A Negative
11719 G > A
A Positive
12308 A > G
A Negative
12705 C > T
T Positive
14766 C > T
T Positive
A total of 4 mutations.
20
The presence of a mutation is as informative as is the absence of a mutation. For example, mtDNA
haplogroup H is the most common haplogroup among Europeans, and is confirmed in part by the absence
of all SNP markers tested in the mtDNA SNP Backbone test. (Nicholl, 2002).
16. CONCLUSION
Maternal Markers
mtDNA HV1: 8 Mutations
mtDNA HV2: 8 Mutations
mtDNA SNP: 4 Mutations
This specific pattern of mutations confirms Lou Sheehan’s mtDNA Haplogroup to be: I.
18. Works Cited
Aurignacian culture. (2008). In Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved July 23, 2008, from
Encyclopædia Britannica Online:
http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/43368/Aurignacian-culture
Fitzpatrick, C. & Yeiser, A. (2005). DNA & Genealogy. Fountain Valley:
Rice Book Press.
Fitzpatrick, C. (2005). Forensic Genealogy. Fountain Valley, California: Rice Book
Press.
Genetic Geneology (2008) http://www.genebase.com/index.php; and
http://www.genebase.com/index.php (maintained by Genetrack). Retrieved July
15, 2008 from: http://www.dnaancestryproject.com/
Gibson, G. & Muse, S.V. (2002). Primer of Genome Science. (1st ed.). Sunderland,
Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates, Inc.
Goodwin, W. & Linacre, A. & Hadi, S. (2007). An Introduction to Forensic Genetics.
West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Hart, A. (2002). How to Interpret Your DNA Test Results for Family History and
Ancestry: Scientists Speak Out on Geneaolgy Joining Genetics. Lincoln,
Nebraska: iUniverse.
Nicholl, D. (2002). An Introduction to Genetic Engineering. (2nd
ed.). New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Olson, S. (2002). Mapping Human History. New York: Mariner Books.
19. Ridley, M. (2000). Genome The Autobiography of a Species in 23 Chapters. New York:
HarperCollins.
Rodden Robinson, T. (2005). Genetics for Dummies. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley, Inc.
Smolenyak Smolenyak, M. & Turner, A. (2004). Trace Your Roots with DNA. Rodale.
Time and Space The Archaeological Context. Retrieved July 23, 2008 from:
http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/arcnat/chauvet/en/espa2.htm
Wells, S. (2007). Deep Ancestry Inside the Ancestry Genographic Project. Washington,
D.C.: National Geographic Society.
Wells, S. (2003). The Journey of Man a Genetic Odyssey. New York: Random House
Trade Paperback.