Presentation from the 2/15 & 2/16 Alameda County Workgroup Economic and Budget Forum.
For updates on the Alameda County budget, visit
http://acgov.org/budget.htm.
-Office of Supervisor Keith Carson
Alameda County Board of Supervisors, District 5
The Economic Importance of Deep Creek Lake (10.10.2013)Kim Durst
- Real property taxes make up over 70% of Garrett County's budgeted revenue for 2013, with District 18 accounting for over 43% of real property tax revenue.
- The number of building permits and their declared value have generally increased in both the Deep Creek Lake watershed and the entire county since the late 1990s.
- Residential real estate sales in both the Deep Creek Lake watershed and the entire county have fluctuated but remained relatively strong in recent years.
The document summarizes changes to property valuations and tax rates in Cherokee County Appraisal District. Key points include:
- CCAD failed a state audit and found values were low in New Summerfield ISD, increasing residential values in that district by up to 25%.
- CCAD joined the Greater Tyler Area Realtor's MLS which will provide market data to help determine accurate property values.
- Oil and gas values decreased by around $40 million due to lower gas prices and production. Residential values in NSISD increased 7-25% depending on home type.
At a town hall meeting, the Finance Director and Finance Committee Chair presented Macedonia's financial information. They discussed that the city's major revenue sources are income tax and property tax. The general fund and debt payments were also overviewed. It was noted that personnel costs make up over half of general fund expenses and that safety forces receive over 50% of the budget. Projections showed a potential general fund deficit due to reduced revenues that would decrease reserves.
The Innovation Center was awarded a five-year grant renewal from the U.S. Department of Commerce to promote innovation and entrepreneurship in northeastern Oklahoma. The document provides an analysis of economic indicators for counties and cities in northeastern Oklahoma such as sales tax collection amounts, building permits issued, and electric and water meter counts. Charts and tables present data on these economic indicators from 2011 to 2013.
Three projects were monitored for compliance by Research Valley Partnership (RVP) in 2015. FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies Texas met its payroll and employment targets at both its National Center for Therapeutics Manufacturing and Biocorridor locations. Reynolds & Reynolds exceeded both its investment and payroll requirements.
Community living supports in the state of michiganJColaianne
This document contains benchmark data on community living supports (CLS) spending and utilization within the state of Michigan from 2006 to 2013. It shows that statewide annual CLS spending increased from $228 million to $432 million during this period. The four regions of Lenawee, Livingston, Monroe, and Washtenaw had higher average CLS costs per case, units per case, and percentage of total service costs attributed to CLS compared to statewide averages. Projections show CLS costs for these regions continuing to rise through 2017 without a rate increase.
Information on Louisville AIDS Walk fundraising trends, the increase of people living with HIV/AIDS in our area, the increase of client services delivered by local HIV/AIDS service organizations. This presentation shows how we were receiving more funding when we had fewer clients to serve. We hope it will illustrate the need for support of Louisville AIDS Walk.
This document summarizes the financial projections of El Salto Ltda., a Chilean company that plans to invest $13.2 million to grow and diversify its agricultural products. It projects revenues and costs over 10 years both with and without the investment project. Revenues are projected to increase significantly with the project due to expanding livestock and producing an additional 22,250 kilograms annually. Total costs are also projected to increase to support the larger operations. The analysis evaluates whether the investment will be economically viable and profitable over the 10-year period.
The Economic Importance of Deep Creek Lake (10.10.2013)Kim Durst
- Real property taxes make up over 70% of Garrett County's budgeted revenue for 2013, with District 18 accounting for over 43% of real property tax revenue.
- The number of building permits and their declared value have generally increased in both the Deep Creek Lake watershed and the entire county since the late 1990s.
- Residential real estate sales in both the Deep Creek Lake watershed and the entire county have fluctuated but remained relatively strong in recent years.
The document summarizes changes to property valuations and tax rates in Cherokee County Appraisal District. Key points include:
- CCAD failed a state audit and found values were low in New Summerfield ISD, increasing residential values in that district by up to 25%.
- CCAD joined the Greater Tyler Area Realtor's MLS which will provide market data to help determine accurate property values.
- Oil and gas values decreased by around $40 million due to lower gas prices and production. Residential values in NSISD increased 7-25% depending on home type.
At a town hall meeting, the Finance Director and Finance Committee Chair presented Macedonia's financial information. They discussed that the city's major revenue sources are income tax and property tax. The general fund and debt payments were also overviewed. It was noted that personnel costs make up over half of general fund expenses and that safety forces receive over 50% of the budget. Projections showed a potential general fund deficit due to reduced revenues that would decrease reserves.
The Innovation Center was awarded a five-year grant renewal from the U.S. Department of Commerce to promote innovation and entrepreneurship in northeastern Oklahoma. The document provides an analysis of economic indicators for counties and cities in northeastern Oklahoma such as sales tax collection amounts, building permits issued, and electric and water meter counts. Charts and tables present data on these economic indicators from 2011 to 2013.
Three projects were monitored for compliance by Research Valley Partnership (RVP) in 2015. FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies Texas met its payroll and employment targets at both its National Center for Therapeutics Manufacturing and Biocorridor locations. Reynolds & Reynolds exceeded both its investment and payroll requirements.
Community living supports in the state of michiganJColaianne
This document contains benchmark data on community living supports (CLS) spending and utilization within the state of Michigan from 2006 to 2013. It shows that statewide annual CLS spending increased from $228 million to $432 million during this period. The four regions of Lenawee, Livingston, Monroe, and Washtenaw had higher average CLS costs per case, units per case, and percentage of total service costs attributed to CLS compared to statewide averages. Projections show CLS costs for these regions continuing to rise through 2017 without a rate increase.
Information on Louisville AIDS Walk fundraising trends, the increase of people living with HIV/AIDS in our area, the increase of client services delivered by local HIV/AIDS service organizations. This presentation shows how we were receiving more funding when we had fewer clients to serve. We hope it will illustrate the need for support of Louisville AIDS Walk.
This document summarizes the financial projections of El Salto Ltda., a Chilean company that plans to invest $13.2 million to grow and diversify its agricultural products. It projects revenues and costs over 10 years both with and without the investment project. Revenues are projected to increase significantly with the project due to expanding livestock and producing an additional 22,250 kilograms annually. Total costs are also projected to increase to support the larger operations. The analysis evaluates whether the investment will be economically viable and profitable over the 10-year period.
Alameda County 2011-12 Proposed Budget OverviewKeith Carson
The document provides an overview of Alameda County's proposed budget for FY 2011-12. It discusses economic factors like unemployment rates, home values, and tax revenues that impact the budget. The proposed $2.056 billion budget is $45 million less than FY 2010-11 and reduces positions by 55. It allocates over half of funding from state/federal aid and about 15% each from property taxes and charges for services. Major expenditures include health care, public assistance, and public protection.
This document summarizes revenue and expenditure changes for a school district from FY09 to FY11. It shows that total revenues decreased by $4 million (10%) over that period due to reductions in local, state, and federal funding sources. Expenditures also decreased through reductions to below-the-line programs, retirement payouts, and efficiency savings, though insurance costs increased. The result was a balanced budget with a structural surplus of $7 million.
The document summarizes a meeting of the Cook County Pension Sub-Committee where Commissioner Gainer presented several options to improve the funded status of the county pension plan including increasing employer and employee contributions as well as reducing retirement benefits, and discussed research on how 401k plans are used which found that loans, withdrawals and cash outs reduce future retirement income.
This document provides a summary of key social, economic, and environmental indicators for Orange County, NC from 1997-2010. It discusses population growth, employment levels, income levels, housing prices, education levels, health metrics, crime rates, tourism impact, and air/water quality for the county and surrounding areas. The data is drawn from various government sources and shows both positive and negative trends across different indicators over time.
The document summarizes the economic impact of the tech bust in Austin, Texas from 2000-2003. It notes that occupancy rates for industrial and office space fell nearly 20% in this period. The city's sales tax revenue declined by $13 million, impacting city services. Venture capital investment dropped to 20% of 2000 levels by 2002. Meanwhile, Austin had reduced its economic development funding and staffing. The document outlines the goals and results of the Opportunity Austin economic development plan from 2004-2008, noting it exceeded job and payroll increase targets. Real estate absorption and prices rebounded after 2003. However, the economic downturn is also discussed, with many companies in Austin downsizing operations in 2008-2009.
North Carolina's economy and tax revenues have been declining in recent decades. While the state was once a top performer in job and income growth, it now lags behind national averages. The tax base has narrowed as consumption patterns have changed, yet tax rates have increased to compensate. This unstable structure leaves the state vulnerable to budget shortfalls during recessions. To promote long-term economic growth and fiscal stability, tax reform is needed to develop a simpler, more competitive system that broadens the base and ensures a steady revenue stream.
2010 City Of Bethlehem Finance And Budget PresentationNachman Shelef
The document provides information from the 2010 City of Bethlehem Finance & Budget Presentation. It discusses the city's budget expenses and revenues for 2010, significant cost increases from 2009 to 2010, trends in real estate valuations and tax revenues, goals for casino host fees, increases in public safety spending and staffing, new public safety equipment and technology, efforts to reduce crime rates, and how Bethlehem's crime rates compare to other cities in Pennsylvania.
State of Oregon's quarterly economic and revenue forecast release. Still no personal income tax kicker in the baseline, however the threshold is razor thin with one income tax filing season to go. There is a corporate kicker in the forecast, which will be dedicated to education next biennium. This forecast also forms the base of the Governor's Recommended Budget for the 2015-17 biennium.
Community Living Supports in the state of michiganJColaianne
This document provides benchmark data on community living supports (CLS) spending and service utilization within the state of Michigan from 2006 to 2013. It shows that statewide annual CLS spending increased from $228 million to $432 million during this period. The four regions of Lenawee, Livingston, Monroe, and Washtenaw had higher average CLS costs per case and utilization compared to statewide averages. The document also projects increasing demand for CLS services and costs in these regions through 2017 without a rate increase.
The State of the Community Report is the only one of its kind in the community; it tracks the well-being of Chapel Hill-Carrboro along social, economic, and environmental indicators. On August 28, 2014, Aaron Nelson, president & CEO of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro Chamber of Commerce, presented the report and took questions from attendees.
The State of the Community Report is a project of the Partnership for a Sustainable Community. For more information about the Partnership, visit, http://bit.ly/17PdnXf.
The document contains revenue projections for two divisions (A and B) of a company across multiple scenarios from 2009-2018. It includes assumptions about revenue growth rates, projected revenues, additional sources of revenue from licensing and grants, manufacturing and operating expenses, and cash flow statements. The key information is revenue and cost projections for two divisions under different growth scenarios from 2009-2018.
The document provides information about the sale of the Long Board Surf Loft located in Ucluelet, British Columbia. It is being sold for $129,000 and includes all furnishings and appliances. Over the past 10 years it has provided a modest return on investment and has recurring guests. Annual occupancy rates and revenues are provided from 2004-2013 showing consistent use of the property as a vacation rental.
1) Pivot tables allow users to efficiently track expenses by automatically adjusting formulas when data is added or removed. This prevents calculation errors unlike static tables that require manual formula updates.
2) Pivot tables enable identification of alarming expense trends over time by facilitating comparisons of year-to-date and monthly expenses across years.
3) Differences observed between years can indicate over or under budget expenses and help pinpoint which specific expense categories are driving changes.
A presentation given in 2010 to the Mayor, Public Safety Commissioner and Council on the availability of a grant to do an efficiency study for Police and Fire department
This is the same document used by President Preckwinkle and senior administration officials when discussing the 2013 Budget Recommendation with newspaper Editorial Boards.
The average number of
Students/Non-Instructional
Professional in the eight K-12
districts is 438.3
Keene averages 406.6
Students/Non-Instructional
Professional.
guidance counselors, library
media specialists, principals,
assistant principals, etc.
Students served by each non-
instructional professional.
Of the eight K-12 districts,
the average number of
Students/Non-Instructional
Professional is 438.3
Keene averages 406.6
Students/Non-Instructional
Professional.
This category does not include
clerical or other support staff.
This document discusses economic development and population trends in Berks County, Pennsylvania. It finds that while the county saw strong population growth from 1980 to 2010, the growth has slowed since 2010 with more people moving out than moving in. Manufacturing and healthcare have added the most jobs between 2009-2014. The tax bases of communities in the east region of the county rely heavily on residential development. The document also presents tools and strategies to identify suitable land for commercial and industrial development, including addressing issues like zoning, permitting, and incentives.
Here is the presentation that was shared with our MA Chapter AMTA members on Sunday May 6, 2012 at our 52nd Annual Meeting. The meeting was held at the Boston Newton Marriott and was attended by close to 275 people. Please visit www.massamta.org to learn more about massage therapy and the MA Chapter AMTA.
Yearly benchmark presentation to track growth of New Braunfels and Comal County. Includes statistics like sales tax growth, per capita growth, population, building permits and real property valuations. For more information, contact at info@buildnb.org
Alameda County 2011-12 Proposed Budget OverviewKeith Carson
The document provides an overview of Alameda County's proposed budget for FY 2011-12. It discusses economic factors like unemployment rates, home values, and tax revenues that impact the budget. The proposed $2.056 billion budget is $45 million less than FY 2010-11 and reduces positions by 55. It allocates over half of funding from state/federal aid and about 15% each from property taxes and charges for services. Major expenditures include health care, public assistance, and public protection.
This document summarizes revenue and expenditure changes for a school district from FY09 to FY11. It shows that total revenues decreased by $4 million (10%) over that period due to reductions in local, state, and federal funding sources. Expenditures also decreased through reductions to below-the-line programs, retirement payouts, and efficiency savings, though insurance costs increased. The result was a balanced budget with a structural surplus of $7 million.
The document summarizes a meeting of the Cook County Pension Sub-Committee where Commissioner Gainer presented several options to improve the funded status of the county pension plan including increasing employer and employee contributions as well as reducing retirement benefits, and discussed research on how 401k plans are used which found that loans, withdrawals and cash outs reduce future retirement income.
This document provides a summary of key social, economic, and environmental indicators for Orange County, NC from 1997-2010. It discusses population growth, employment levels, income levels, housing prices, education levels, health metrics, crime rates, tourism impact, and air/water quality for the county and surrounding areas. The data is drawn from various government sources and shows both positive and negative trends across different indicators over time.
The document summarizes the economic impact of the tech bust in Austin, Texas from 2000-2003. It notes that occupancy rates for industrial and office space fell nearly 20% in this period. The city's sales tax revenue declined by $13 million, impacting city services. Venture capital investment dropped to 20% of 2000 levels by 2002. Meanwhile, Austin had reduced its economic development funding and staffing. The document outlines the goals and results of the Opportunity Austin economic development plan from 2004-2008, noting it exceeded job and payroll increase targets. Real estate absorption and prices rebounded after 2003. However, the economic downturn is also discussed, with many companies in Austin downsizing operations in 2008-2009.
North Carolina's economy and tax revenues have been declining in recent decades. While the state was once a top performer in job and income growth, it now lags behind national averages. The tax base has narrowed as consumption patterns have changed, yet tax rates have increased to compensate. This unstable structure leaves the state vulnerable to budget shortfalls during recessions. To promote long-term economic growth and fiscal stability, tax reform is needed to develop a simpler, more competitive system that broadens the base and ensures a steady revenue stream.
2010 City Of Bethlehem Finance And Budget PresentationNachman Shelef
The document provides information from the 2010 City of Bethlehem Finance & Budget Presentation. It discusses the city's budget expenses and revenues for 2010, significant cost increases from 2009 to 2010, trends in real estate valuations and tax revenues, goals for casino host fees, increases in public safety spending and staffing, new public safety equipment and technology, efforts to reduce crime rates, and how Bethlehem's crime rates compare to other cities in Pennsylvania.
State of Oregon's quarterly economic and revenue forecast release. Still no personal income tax kicker in the baseline, however the threshold is razor thin with one income tax filing season to go. There is a corporate kicker in the forecast, which will be dedicated to education next biennium. This forecast also forms the base of the Governor's Recommended Budget for the 2015-17 biennium.
Community Living Supports in the state of michiganJColaianne
This document provides benchmark data on community living supports (CLS) spending and service utilization within the state of Michigan from 2006 to 2013. It shows that statewide annual CLS spending increased from $228 million to $432 million during this period. The four regions of Lenawee, Livingston, Monroe, and Washtenaw had higher average CLS costs per case and utilization compared to statewide averages. The document also projects increasing demand for CLS services and costs in these regions through 2017 without a rate increase.
The State of the Community Report is the only one of its kind in the community; it tracks the well-being of Chapel Hill-Carrboro along social, economic, and environmental indicators. On August 28, 2014, Aaron Nelson, president & CEO of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro Chamber of Commerce, presented the report and took questions from attendees.
The State of the Community Report is a project of the Partnership for a Sustainable Community. For more information about the Partnership, visit, http://bit.ly/17PdnXf.
The document contains revenue projections for two divisions (A and B) of a company across multiple scenarios from 2009-2018. It includes assumptions about revenue growth rates, projected revenues, additional sources of revenue from licensing and grants, manufacturing and operating expenses, and cash flow statements. The key information is revenue and cost projections for two divisions under different growth scenarios from 2009-2018.
The document provides information about the sale of the Long Board Surf Loft located in Ucluelet, British Columbia. It is being sold for $129,000 and includes all furnishings and appliances. Over the past 10 years it has provided a modest return on investment and has recurring guests. Annual occupancy rates and revenues are provided from 2004-2013 showing consistent use of the property as a vacation rental.
1) Pivot tables allow users to efficiently track expenses by automatically adjusting formulas when data is added or removed. This prevents calculation errors unlike static tables that require manual formula updates.
2) Pivot tables enable identification of alarming expense trends over time by facilitating comparisons of year-to-date and monthly expenses across years.
3) Differences observed between years can indicate over or under budget expenses and help pinpoint which specific expense categories are driving changes.
A presentation given in 2010 to the Mayor, Public Safety Commissioner and Council on the availability of a grant to do an efficiency study for Police and Fire department
This is the same document used by President Preckwinkle and senior administration officials when discussing the 2013 Budget Recommendation with newspaper Editorial Boards.
The average number of
Students/Non-Instructional
Professional in the eight K-12
districts is 438.3
Keene averages 406.6
Students/Non-Instructional
Professional.
guidance counselors, library
media specialists, principals,
assistant principals, etc.
Students served by each non-
instructional professional.
Of the eight K-12 districts,
the average number of
Students/Non-Instructional
Professional is 438.3
Keene averages 406.6
Students/Non-Instructional
Professional.
This category does not include
clerical or other support staff.
This document discusses economic development and population trends in Berks County, Pennsylvania. It finds that while the county saw strong population growth from 1980 to 2010, the growth has slowed since 2010 with more people moving out than moving in. Manufacturing and healthcare have added the most jobs between 2009-2014. The tax bases of communities in the east region of the county rely heavily on residential development. The document also presents tools and strategies to identify suitable land for commercial and industrial development, including addressing issues like zoning, permitting, and incentives.
Here is the presentation that was shared with our MA Chapter AMTA members on Sunday May 6, 2012 at our 52nd Annual Meeting. The meeting was held at the Boston Newton Marriott and was attended by close to 275 people. Please visit www.massamta.org to learn more about massage therapy and the MA Chapter AMTA.
Yearly benchmark presentation to track growth of New Braunfels and Comal County. Includes statistics like sales tax growth, per capita growth, population, building permits and real property valuations. For more information, contact at info@buildnb.org
Alameda County Budget Workgroup Forum (February 2011)
1. County Administrator’s Office
ALAMEDA COUNTY
Economic and Budget Forum
The Worst Is Yet to Come
February 2011
Supervisor Keith Carson,Chair,Budget Workgroup
Supervisor
S per isor Wilma Chan
Supervisor Scott Haggerty
Susan S Muranishi County Administrator
S. Muranishi,
21. County Administrator’s Office
Economic Outlook
Very slow recovery
Unemployment still high
Unemployment still high
Home values way off peak
Demand for services high
Demand for services high
Revenues down
21
27. County Administrator’s Office
FY 2010‐11 Final Budget
Appropriation/ F.T.E.
Revenue Positions*
All Funds $2.4 Billion 9,103
General/Grants/ $2.1 Billion 7,287
Measure A Fund
*Full‐time equivalent positions 27
28. County Administrator’s Office
FY 2010 11 Final Budget
FY 2010‐11 Final Budget
General/Grant/Measure A Funds
Appropriation by Program
General
Health Care Government Capital Projects
Services 10% 1%
27%
Non Program
Expenditures Public Assistance
3% 32%
Public Protection Contingency &
25% Reserves
2%
Total Appropriation: $2.1 billion 28
29. County Administrator’s Office
FY 2010 11 Final Budget
FY 2010‐11 Final Budget
General/Grant/Measure A Funds
Appropriation by Major Object
Other Salaries &
Financing Uses Benefits
Other Charges 4% 39%
21%
Fixed Assets
1%
Services &
Supplies
35%
Total Appropriation: $2.1 billion 29
30. County Administrator’s Office
FY 2010 11 Final Budget
FY 2010‐11 Final Budget
General/Grant/Measure A Funds
Total Financing by Source
Other Financing
Current Property Tax Sources
14% 6%
Other Taxes
8%
Other Revenue State/Federal/Local
3% Govt. Aid
Charges for Services 54%
15%
Total Financing: $2.1 billion 30
31. County Administrator’s Office
FY 2010‐11 Discretionary Revenue
Share of Total General Fund
EPSDT Capital Discretionary
Designation Designation Revenue
1% 0% 26%
Use of FMR
U f FMR
3%
Debt Service
Revenue
Program Revenue 2%
68%
Total General Fund: $1.9 billion 31
32. County Administrator’s Office
FY 2010‐11 Discretionary Revenue by Source
Vehicle License Fee
(ERAF)
Other Revenue
30%
8%
Interest on
Investments
1%
Sales & Use Tax
Property Tax Sales & Use Tax 2%
58% (ERAF)
1%
Discretionary Revenue: $502.7 million 32
33. County Administrator’s Office
FY 2010‐11 Use of Discretionary Revenue
by Program
Capital Projects General
1% Government
10% Debt Service
Public Assistance 5%
13%
Health Care
Public Protection
17%
45%
Contingency &
Contingency &
Reserve Increase
9%
Discretionary Revenue: $502.7 million 33
34. County Administrator’s Office
FY 2010 11 Balancing Strategies
FY 2010‐11 Balancing Strategies
(in millions)
Countywide Fiscal Mgmt.
Strategies Reward
11% 40%
Program
/
Reductions/ EPSDT
EPSDT
Revenue Designation
41% 8%
Funding Gap: $152.4 million
34
EPSDT = Early Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Program
36. County Administrator’s Office
Closing the Gap
General/Grant/Measure A Funds
($ in millions)
Net County
Cost FTE
Reduction Reductions
General Government $22.7 16.9
Health Care Services $
$40.4 6.8
Public Assistance $30.1 +2.0
Public Protection
Public Protection $42.8 83.9
Programs $136.0 105.6
Countywide Strategies
Countywide Strategies $16.4
$16.4 0.0
Grand Total $152.4 105.6
38. County Administrator’s Office
President’s FY 2011 and 2012 Budgets
FY 2011
$3.8 trillion plan proposed, not approved
House Cmte proposes $100 billion cuts, largest in history
H C $100 billi l i hi
FY 2012
FY 2012
$3.7 trillion budget proposed
$
$1.1 trillion discretionary spending
y p g
Over 200 programs to be cut or eliminated
38
39. County Administrator’s Office
Federal Budget Update
Annual Deficits
2009: $1.4 trillion
2010: $1.3 trillion
2010 $1 3 t illi
2011: $1.6 trillion
2012: $1.1 trillion
2012: $1 1 trillion
National Debt % GDP
2008: $6 trillion 40%
2010: $9 trillion 62%
2021: $18 trillion (est.)
2021 $18 illi ( ) 77%
39
41. County Administrator’s Office
Governor’s Budget
$26.4 billion in solutions through 2011‐12
Cuts $12.5 billion
Revenues $12 billion
Borrowing/transfers
g/ $1.9 billion
Realignment of services
g
Special election to extend tax increases
41
42. County Administrator’s Office
Governor s Budget
Governor’s Budget
Impact to AC Social Services Programs
CalWORKS (20,500 AC recipients)
13% grant reduction ($18M cut to AC clients)
48‐month time limit ($24M impact to 4,000 families)
48 h l ($24 i 4 000 f ili )
Maintain block grant cut (ongoing AC loss $15M)
Single Allocation reduction (AC impact: $8M)
Child Care
Eliminate child care for 11 12 yr. olds (approx. 370 children)
Eliminate child care for 11‐12 yr. olds (approx. 370 children)
Decrease eligibility standards from 75% to 60% State median income
Subsidies cut ($40M impact to AC clients)
42
43. County Administrator’s Office
Governor s Budget
Governor’s Budget
Impact to AC Social Services Programs (cont.)
In Home Support Services (18,000 in AC)
Cut provider hours 8.4%
Cut domestic services in shared living environments (14,400 cases)
C d h dl (14 400 )
AC Impact: Hours of service reduced 28% (6 million hours), wage loss
to IHSS providers: $71 million.
SSI/SSP Grants (39,000 AC recipients; $7M impact)
THP+ reduced allocation (AC: $1.6M; 70 beds)
Seriously, Emotionally Disturbed funding restored
S i l E i ll Di b d f di d
Suspend County Share of Child Support collections (AC: $0.6M)
43
44. County Administrator’s Office
Governor s Budget
Governor’s Budget
Impact to AC Health Programs
Medi‐Cal (up to 100,000 AC recipients affected)
Caps on doctor visits, prescriptions, other services
Co‐payments
Caps on supplies, equipment, hearing aids, OTC drugs
Eliminate Adult Day Health Care (880 people in AC)
y ( p p )
10% reduction in provider payments
Use First Five funds for children svcs (7,200 AC children impacted)
Healthy Families (est. 20,400 AC families)
Increase premiums, co‐payments, cut vision benefit
44
45. County Administrator’s Office
Governor s Budget
Governor’s Budget
Other
Eliminate redevelopment agencies AC impact: $18M/year
Reenactment of gas tax swap to fund transportation
Suspend, defer, repeal state mandates AC impact: $11M
45
46. County Administrator’s Office
Governor s Budget
Governor’s Budget
Realignment Phase 1
Transfer low‐level offenders, parole violators
Transfer Adult parole
Transfer remaining juvenile justice programs
Transfer Court security to County sheriffs
VLF‐funded programs:
f d d
COPS, JJCPA, Juvenile Probation, Booking Fees, CalMMEt, other
Transfer fire protection and medical response in wildland
Transfer fire protection and medical response in wildland
areas
46
47. County Administrator’s Office
Governor’s Budget
G ’ B d
Realignment Phase 1 (cont.)
Mental health services, using Prop. 63 funds
Substance abuse programs
Child Welfare Services/Foster Care
Child W lf S i /F C
Adult Protective Services
47
48. County Administrator’s Office
Governor’s Budget –
G ’ B d
Realignment Phase 2
IHSS State
CA Children’s Services State
CalWORKs Counties
Child Care Counties
Food Stamps
Food Stamps Counties
48
49. County Administrator’s Office
Realignment
Alameda County General Principles
Constitutional protection that realigned programs will come
with adequate funding to cover costs
Need all or some combination of the following:
Guaranteed funding source
Guaranteed funding source
General Fund “backstop”
Maximum local control/flexibility
Ability to suspend, curtail or eliminate programs if funding is
insufficient
49
51. County Administrator’s Office
Legislative Analyst:
Possible Cuts If Voters Reject Taxes
Schools
Eliminate K-3 class size reduction
Kindergarteners must be 5 years old
Community Colleges
90-unit cap on subsidized credits
Increase fees from $26/unit to $66/unit
Cut State subsidy for athletics
Universities
Tuition: +7% UC, +10% CSU
Personnel costs: -10% UC, -5% CSU
51
52. County Administrator’s Office
Legislative Analyst:
Possible Cuts If Voters Reject Taxes
Health/Human Services
Reduce IHSS wage to minimum $300M
Cut food and aid for noncitizens $190M
Stricter income eligibility for welfare-to-work recipients $180M
Public Safety
Require 2nd, 3rd strikes be serious or violent $50M
Eliminate public safety grants $506M
Automated speed enforcement cameras $
p $150M
Two furloughs/month for court employees $130M
52
53. County Administrator’s Office
Legislative Analyst:
Possible Cuts If Voters Reject Taxes
General Government
Reduce State employee pay 9.4% $700M
Reduce State employee health care 30% $330M
Transportation
Another accounting swap $400M
Oil drilling at Tranquillon Ridge $100M
New fee on residential property owners in wildlands $300M
53
54. County Administrator’s Office
Alameda County
Ongoing Budget Policies
Continue to monitor expenditures and revenues
Restrict spending
p g
Pursue revenue enhancements
Agencies & Departments directed to fill only
critical (life/safety, mandated, cost effective)
p
positions
54
55. County Administrator’s Office
Pending Factors
Economy
Retirement/medical costs
Federal budget and debt
State Budget and June election
Propositions
55
56. County Administrator’s Office
Key dates
Budget Requests Due February 18, 2011
Early Budget Work Sessions April 5, 2011
Funding Gap identified Late March/early April
Reduction plans May 2011
Proposed Budget Submitted
d d S b d Early June 2011
l 2011
Final Budget Adopted Late June 2011
56
57. County Administrator’s Office
Alameda County
Budget Information on the Web
www.acgov.org/budget.htm
www acgov org/budget htm
57
58. County Administrator’s Office
ALAMEDA COUNTY
Economic and Budget Forum
The Worst Is Yet to Come
February 2011
Supervisor Keith Carson, Chair,Budget Workgroup
Supervisor
S per isor Wilma Chan
Supervisor Scott Haggerty
Susan S Muranishi County Administrator
S. Muranishi,