SlideShare a Scribd company logo
County Administrator’s Office




ALAMEDA COUNTY
Economic and Budget Forum
The Worst Is Yet to Come
February 2011
Supervisor Keith Carson,Chair,Budget Workgroup
Supervisor
S per isor Wilma Chan
Supervisor Scott Haggerty
Susan S Muranishi County Administrator
      S. Muranishi,
County Administrator’s Office




     Overview
Economic Update
FY 10‐11 Final Budget
                   g
State and Federal Budgets




                                                     2
County Administrator’s Office


Unemployment Rate 
Unemployment Rate – 1990 to Present
(not seasonally adjusted)
County Administrator’s Office


Unemployment Rate 
Unemployment Rate – 1990 to Present
(not seasonally adjusted)
County Administrator’s Office


Unemployment Rate 
Unemployment Rate – 1990 to Present 
(not seasonally adjusted)
County Administrator’s Office


             Alameda County Unemployment 
                            y      p y
             by City/ Unincorporated Area
18%
                                  16.3%
16%               15.6%


14%


12%


10%

                          7.8%
8%


6%
      4.7%

4%




                                                             6
County Administrator’s Office


             Alameda County Median Home Values
             July 2007 – Dec. 2010 
650,000 
650 000
           619,000 
600,000 

550,000 

500,000 

450,000 

400,000 
400 000

350,000 
                                                           347,000 
300,000 
                             280,000 
250,000 

200,000 



                                                                 7
County Administrator’s Office



                   Alameda County
                   Property Foreclosures
       9,000
        ,

       8,000

       7,000

       6,000

       5,000

       4,000
       4 000

       3,000

       2,000

       1,000

           0
                  2005        2006         2007   2008        2009         2010

                                                                                  8

Source: Alameda County Clerk/Recorder’s Office
County Administrator’s Office



      Assessment Roll—Percent Change
      Assessment Roll Percent Change
      Alameda County
18%

16%

14%

12%

10%

8%

6%

4%

2%

0%

‐2%

‐4%

                                                         9
County Administrator’s Office




             Sales Tax Revenues
15,000,000



14,000,000



13,000,000



12,000,000



11,000,000



10,000,000
                                                                              10
             2004‐05   2005‐06   2006‐07   2007‐08   2008‐09   2009‐10     2010‐11
County Administrator’s Office




                 Prop. 172 Sales Tax Revenues
$125,000,000
$125 000 000



$120,000,000



$115,000,000



$110,000,000



$105,000,000



$100,000,000



 $95,000,000
                                                                                         11
               2002‐03 2003‐04 2004‐05 2005‐06 2006‐07 2007‐08 2008‐09 2009‐10 2010‐11
County Administrator’s Office




               Measure A Revenues—County Share
$30,000,000
$30 000 000




$28,000,000




$26,000,000




$24,000,000




$22,000,000                                                                       12

              2005‐2006   2006‐2007   2007‐2008   2008‐2009   2009‐2010    2010‐2011
County Administrator’s Office




                Realignment Revenues
210,000,000



200,000,000



190,000,000



180,000,000



170,000,000



160,000,000
              2003‐04   2004‐05   2005‐06   2006‐07   2007‐08   2008‐09   2009‐10   2010‐11
                                                                                         13
County Administrator’s Office



            Quarterly Interest Rate for 
            Investment Pool
6%
     5.0%
5%


4%


3%


2%


1%
                                                         0.5%

0%



                                                                14
County Administrator’s Office




     Increased Demand for Services

Dramatic increase in caseloads for assistance 
programs, including:
  CalWORKs
  Food Stamps
  Medi‐Cal
  IHSS


                                                        15
County Administrator’s Office




                  CalWORKS
21,000
21 000
                                                   20,494
20,500

20,000

19,500

19,000

18,500

18,000

17,500

17,000

16,500
         16,520
16,000



                                                     16
County Administrator’s Office




                  Medi-Cal
85,000



                                                   80,625
80,000




75,000




70,000




65,000




         60,968
60,000



                                                     17
County Administrator’s Office




                 Food Stamps
43,500
  ,
                                                      40,435
38,500


33,500


28,500


23,500


18,500


13,500

         8,569
 8,500



                                                       18
County Administrator’s Office




                 General Assistance
11,000
11 000


10,000


 9,000
 9 000


 8,000


 7,000
  ,
                                                              6,240
 6,000


 5,000


 4,000
         3,622

 3,000



                                                              19
County Administrator’s Office




                  In­Home Support Services
19,000                                                         18,450


18,000


17,000


16,000


15,000


14,000


13,000


12,000
12 000

         12,237
11,000


10,000



                                                               20
County Administrator’s Office




      Economic Outlook
Very slow recovery
Unemployment still high
Unemployment still high
Home values way off peak
Demand for services high
Demand for services high
Revenues down



                                                   21
County Administrator’s Office




FY 2010‐2011 Final Budget
FY 2010 2011 Fi l B d




                                               22
County Administrator’s Office



                    ERAF Losses by Year (in millions)
                    ERAF Losses by Year (in millions)
                    Cumulative loss: $4 Billion
$350 
$350                                                                                                           $335
                                                                                                        $320          $326 $320

                                                                                                 $297
$300 
                                                                                          $273
                                                                                   $263
$250                                                                        $236
                                                                     $220
                                                              $206
$200                                                   $187
                                                $170
                                         $158
$150                         $140 $147
              $129 $130 $135


$100 


 $50    $30


  $0 


                                                                                                                              24
County Administrator’s Office



Funding Gaps Since ERAF Intercept 
F di  G      Si    ERAF I t     t 
(in millions)




                                                     25
County Administrator’s Office



Alameda C
Al   d County P
              Property T Di ib i
                       Tax Distribution
Of Each Dollar of Property Tax Collected:




                                                      26
County Administrator’s Office




               FY 2010‐11 Final Budget


                                   Appropriation/                F.T.E. 
                                         Revenue            Positions*
   All Funds                           $2.4 Billion              9,103

   General/Grants/                      $2.1 Billion                7,287
   Measure A Fund




*Full‐time equivalent positions                                                27
County Administrator’s Office


        FY 2010 11 Final Budget 
        FY 2010‐11 Final Budget
        General/Grant/Measure A Funds
        Appropriation by Program
                               General 
   Health Care               Government       Capital Projects
    Services                    10%                 1%
      27%




Non Program 
Expenditures                                            Public Assistance
    3%                                                        32%

         Public Protection                Contingency & 
               25%                          Reserves
                                               2%




      Total Appropriation: $2.1 billion                                     28
County Administrator’s Office


               FY 2010 11 Final Budget
               FY 2010‐11 Final Budget
               General/Grant/Measure A Funds
               Appropriation by Major Object
                              Other                   Salaries & 
                          Financing Uses               Benefits
Other Charges                  4%                       39%
    21%




Fixed Assets
    1%
                    Services & 
                     Supplies
                       35%



          Total Appropriation: $2.1 billion                           29
County Administrator’s Office


                  FY 2010 11 Final Budget
                  FY 2010‐11 Final Budget
                  General/Grant/Measure A Funds
                  Total Financing by Source

                          Other Financing 
Current Property Tax         Sources
        14%                     6%


 Other Taxes
    8%




Other Revenue                                                State/Federal/Local 
     3%                                                           Govt. Aid
                              Charges for Services                  54%
                                     15%



                       Total Financing: $2.1 billion                                30
County Administrator’s Office



               FY 2010‐11 Discretionary Revenue 
               Share of Total General Fund

                       EPSDT          Capital             Discretionary 
                     Designation    Designation             Revenue
                         1%             0%                    26%
  Use of FMR
  U    f FMR
      3%




                                                           Debt Service 
                                                            Revenue
Program Revenue                                                2%
      68%


                  Total General Fund:  $1.9 billion                        31
County Administrator’s Office




          FY 2010‐11 Discretionary Revenue by Source


                                     Vehicle License Fee 
                                          (ERAF)
Other Revenue
                                            30%
     8%

                                                              Interest on 
                                                             Investments
                                                                  1%




                                                            Sales & Use Tax
   Property Tax                   Sales & Use Tax                 2%
      58%                             (ERAF)
                                        1%




       Discretionary Revenue:  $502.7 million                           32
County Administrator’s Office



               FY 2010‐11 Use of Discretionary Revenue
               by Program

                Capital Projects                     General 
                      1%                           Government
                                                      10%          Debt Service
Public Assistance                                                      5%
      13%




                                                                    Health Care
     Public Protection
                                                                       17%
           45%
                                                       Contingency & 
                                                       Contingency &
                                                      Reserve Increase
                                                            9%




                    Discretionary Revenue:  $502.7 million                        33
County Administrator’s Office


                 FY 2010 11 Balancing Strategies
                 FY 2010‐11 Balancing Strategies
                 (in millions)


                     Countywide                                        Fiscal Mgmt. 
                      Strategies                                         Reward
                         11%                                               40%




       Program 
                /
      Reductions/                                                EPSDT 
                                                                 EPSDT
       Revenue                                                 Designation
         41%                                                       8%
                          Funding Gap:  $152.4 million

                                                                                       34
EPSDT = Early Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Program
County Administrator’s Office


FY 2010 11  Closing the Gap
FY 2010‐11 ‐ Closing the Gap
Ongoing vs. One‐Time Strategies




                                                          35
County Administrator’s Office


              Closing the Gap 
              General/Grant/Measure A Funds
              ($ in millions)

                                  Net County 
                                     Cost           FTE 
                                  Reduction      Reductions
General Government                      $22.7             16.9
Health Care Services                    $
                                        $40.4               6.8
Public Assistance                       $30.1             +2.0
Public Protection
Public Protection                       $42.8             83.9
Programs                               $136.0            105.6
Countywide Strategies
Countywide Strategies                   $16.4 
                                        $16.4               0.0
Grand Total                            $152.4            105.6
County Administrator’s Office




Federal Budget Update
F d lB d       U d




                                                37
County Administrator’s Office




           President’s FY 2011 and 2012 Budgets
FY 2011
      $3.8 trillion plan proposed, not approved
      House Cmte proposes $100 billion cuts, largest in history
      H      C               $100 billi       l      i hi

FY 2012 
FY 2012
      $3.7 trillion budget proposed
      $
      $1.1 trillion discretionary spending
                                y p      g
      Over 200 programs to be cut or eliminated


                                                                   38
County Administrator’s Office




        Federal Budget Update
Annual Deficits
   2009: $1.4 trillion
   2010: $1.3 trillion 
   2010 $1 3 t illi
   2011: $1.6 trillion
   2012: $1.1 trillion
   2012: $1 1 trillion

National Debt                  % GDP
   2008: $6 trillion           40%
   2010: $9 trillion           62%
   2021: $18 trillion (est.)
   2021 $18 illi ( )           77%
                                                        39
County Administrator’s Office




State Budget Update
S     B d    U d




                                              40
County Administrator’s Office




          Governor’s Budget
$26.4 billion in solutions through 2011‐12
     Cuts                          $12.5 billion
     Revenues                      $12 billion
     Borrowing/transfers
             g/                    $1.9 billion

     Realignment of services
          g
     Special election to extend tax increases

                                                               41
County Administrator’s Office



         Governor s Budget 
         Governor’s Budget 
         Impact to AC Social Services Programs

CalWORKS (20,500 AC recipients) 
   13% grant reduction ($18M cut to AC clients)
   48‐month time limit ($24M impact to 4,000 families)
   48       h      l    ($24  i          4 000 f ili )
   Maintain block grant cut (ongoing AC loss $15M)
   Single Allocation reduction  (AC impact: $8M)

Child Care
   Eliminate child care for 11 12 yr. olds (approx. 370 children)
   Eliminate child care for 11‐12 yr. olds (approx. 370 children)
   Decrease eligibility standards from 75% to 60% State median income
   Subsidies cut ($40M impact to AC clients)


                                                                       42
County Administrator’s Office



         Governor s Budget 
         Governor’s Budget 
         Impact to AC Social Services Programs (cont.)

In Home Support Services (18,000 in AC)
   Cut provider hours 8.4%
   Cut domestic services in shared living environments (14,400 cases)
   C d                       h dl                      (14 400      )
   AC Impact: Hours of service reduced 28% (6 million hours), wage loss 
   to IHSS providers: $71 million.
SSI/SSP Grants (39,000 AC recipients; $7M impact)
THP+ reduced allocation  (AC: $1.6M; 70 beds)
Seriously, Emotionally Disturbed funding restored
S i    l E     i   ll Di     b d f di           d
Suspend County Share of Child Support collections (AC: $0.6M)

                                                                        43
County Administrator’s Office


         Governor s Budget 
         Governor’s Budget 
         Impact to AC Health Programs 

Medi‐Cal (up to 100,000 AC recipients affected)
   Caps on doctor visits, prescriptions, other services
   Co‐payments
   Caps on supplies, equipment, hearing aids, OTC drugs
   Eliminate Adult Day Health Care (880 people in AC)
                      y              (     p p          )
   10% reduction in provider payments
   Use First Five funds for children svcs (7,200 AC children impacted)


Healthy Families (est. 20,400 AC families)
   Increase premiums, co‐payments, cut vision benefit

                                                                        44
County Administrator’s Office


        Governor s Budget 
        Governor’s Budget 
        Other

Eliminate redevelopment agencies  AC impact: $18M/year
Reenactment of gas tax swap to fund transportation 
Suspend, defer, repeal state mandates AC impact: $11M




                                                              45
County Administrator’s Office



         Governor s Budget
         Governor’s Budget
         Realignment Phase 1

Transfer low‐level offenders, parole violators
Transfer Adult parole
Transfer remaining juvenile justice programs
Transfer Court security to County sheriffs
VLF‐funded programs:
    f d d
   COPS, JJCPA, Juvenile Probation, Booking Fees, CalMMEt, other
Transfer fire protection and medical response in wildland
Transfer fire protection and medical response in wildland
areas


                                                                        46
County Administrator’s Office



         Governor’s Budget
         G       ’  B d
         Realignment Phase 1 (cont.)
Mental health services, using Prop. 63 funds
Substance abuse programs
Child Welfare Services/Foster Care
Child W lf    S i /F           C
Adult Protective Services




                                                                  47
County Administrator’s Office



        Governor’s Budget –
        G       ’  B d  
        Realignment Phase 2
IHSS                          State
CA Children’s Services        State
CalWORKs                      Counties
Child Care                    Counties
Food Stamps
Food Stamps                   Counties




                                                        48
County Administrator’s Office



         Realignment
         Alameda County General Principles

Constitutional protection that realigned programs will come 
with adequate funding to cover costs

Need all or some combination of the following:
   Guaranteed funding source
   Guaranteed funding source
   General Fund “backstop”
   Maximum local control/flexibility
   Ability to suspend, curtail or eliminate programs if funding is 
   insufficient


                                                                       49
County Administrator’s Office




       State Budget



What if ballot initiatives fail?
What if ballot initiati es fail?




                                                     50
County Administrator’s Office



       Legislative Analyst:
       Possible Cuts If Voters Reject Taxes
Schools
   Eliminate K-3 class size reduction
   Kindergarteners must be 5 years old
Community Colleges
   90-unit cap on subsidized credits
   Increase fees from $26/unit to $66/unit
   Cut State subsidy for athletics
Universities
   Tuition: +7% UC, +10% CSU
   Personnel costs: -10% UC, -5% CSU

                                                                     51
County Administrator’s Office



       Legislative Analyst:
       Possible Cuts If Voters Reject Taxes
Health/Human Services
   Reduce IHSS wage to minimum $300M
   Cut food and aid for noncitizens $190M
   Stricter income eligibility for welfare-to-work recipients $180M
Public Safety
   Require 2nd, 3rd strikes be serious or violent $50M
   Eliminate public safety grants $506M
   Automated speed enforcement cameras $
                p                            $150M
   Two furloughs/month for court employees $130M



                                                                          52
County Administrator’s Office



       Legislative Analyst:
       Possible Cuts If Voters Reject Taxes
General Government
   Reduce State employee pay 9.4% $700M
   Reduce State employee health care 30% $330M
Transportation
   Another accounting swap $400M
   Oil drilling at Tranquillon Ridge $100M
   New fee on residential property owners in wildlands $300M




                                                                       53
County Administrator’s Office



     Alameda County
     Ongoing Budget Policies

Continue to monitor expenditures and revenues
Restrict spending
           p       g
Pursue revenue enhancements
Agencies & Departments directed to fill only
critical (life/safety, mandated, cost effective)
p
positions



                                                          54
County Administrator’s Office




      Pending Factors
Economy
Retirement/medical costs
Federal budget and debt
State Budget and June election
Propositions




                                                         55
County Administrator’s Office




         Key dates
Budget Requests Due          February 18, 2011
Early Budget Work Sessions   April 5, 2011
Funding Gap identified       Late March/early April
Reduction plans              May 2011
Proposed Budget Submitted
        d d     S b      d   Early June 2011
                                l       2011
Final Budget Adopted         Late June 2011




                                                              56
County Administrator’s Office


    Alameda County
    Budget Information on the Web




www.acgov.org/budget.htm
www acgov org/budget htm


                                                  57
County Administrator’s Office




ALAMEDA COUNTY
Economic and Budget Forum
The Worst Is Yet to Come
February 2011
Supervisor Keith Carson, Chair,Budget Workgroup
Supervisor
S per isor Wilma Chan
Supervisor Scott Haggerty
Susan S Muranishi County Administrator
      S. Muranishi,

More Related Content

Similar to Alameda County Budget Workgroup Forum (February 2011)

Alameda County 2011-12 Proposed Budget Overview
Alameda County 2011-12 Proposed Budget OverviewAlameda County 2011-12 Proposed Budget Overview
Alameda County 2011-12 Proposed Budget Overview
Keith Carson
 
Fy2011 budget update
Fy2011 budget updateFy2011 budget update
Fy2011 budget update
Park City Education Foundation
 
Commissioner Bridget Gainer: Cook County Pension Committee Meeting - June 29,...
Commissioner Bridget Gainer: Cook County Pension Committee Meeting - June 29,...Commissioner Bridget Gainer: Cook County Pension Committee Meeting - June 29,...
Commissioner Bridget Gainer: Cook County Pension Committee Meeting - June 29,...
Cook County Commissioner Bridget Gainer
 
2010 State of the Community
2010 State of the Community2010 State of the Community
Gfarmer Birmingham Visit 090409
Gfarmer Birmingham Visit 090409Gfarmer Birmingham Visit 090409
Gfarmer Birmingham Visit 090409
Wade Kwon
 
Final tax mod slides 12 09-12
Final tax mod slides 12 09-12Final tax mod slides 12 09-12
Final tax mod slides 12 09-12
Association Executives of North Carolina
 
2010 City Of Bethlehem Finance And Budget Presentation
2010 City Of Bethlehem Finance And Budget Presentation2010 City Of Bethlehem Finance And Budget Presentation
2010 City Of Bethlehem Finance And Budget Presentation
Nachman Shelef
 
Oregon Economic and Revenue Forecast, December 2014
Oregon Economic and Revenue Forecast, December 2014Oregon Economic and Revenue Forecast, December 2014
Oregon Economic and Revenue Forecast, December 2014
Oregon Office of Economic Analysis
 
Community Living Supports in the state of michigan
Community Living Supports in the state of michiganCommunity Living Supports in the state of michigan
Community Living Supports in the state of michigan
JColaianne
 
2014 State of the Community Report
2014 State of the Community Report2014 State of the Community Report
2014 State of the Community Report
The Chamber For a Greater Chapel Hill-Carrboro
 
Cavit Financial Model(1)
Cavit Financial Model(1)Cavit Financial Model(1)
Cavit Financial Model(1)
guest4e1120
 
Long board surf loft 129,000
Long board surf loft 129,000Long board surf loft 129,000
Long board surf loft 129,000
Ron Clayton
 
Why Use Excel Pivot Tables
Why Use Excel Pivot TablesWhy Use Excel Pivot Tables
Why Use Excel Pivot Tables
CharlesNCordaro
 
Local Government Efficiency Grant
Local Government Efficiency GrantLocal Government Efficiency Grant
Local Government Efficiency Grant
Pamela Jardieu-Aderman
 
2013 Executive Budget Recommendation Briefing
2013 Executive Budget Recommendation Briefing2013 Executive Budget Recommendation Briefing
2013 Executive Budget Recommendation Briefing
cookcountyblog
 
Admin Task Force Summary Charts
Admin Task Force Summary ChartsAdmin Task Force Summary Charts
Admin Task Force Summary Charts
Keene School District
 
Economic Development in Your Community: EAST REGION
Economic Development in Your Community: EAST REGIONEconomic Development in Your Community: EAST REGION
Economic Development in Your Community: EAST REGION
Greater Reading Economic Partnership
 
MA AMTA 52st Annual Meeting
MA AMTA 52st Annual MeetingMA AMTA 52st Annual Meeting
MA AMTA 52st Annual Meeting
Curran Consulting
 
2011 Benchmark Study
2011 Benchmark Study2011 Benchmark Study
2011 Benchmark Study
New Braunfels EDC
 
2012 City of Brandon Budget Highlights
2012 City of Brandon Budget Highlights2012 City of Brandon Budget Highlights
2012 City of Brandon Budget Highlights
City Brandon
 

Similar to Alameda County Budget Workgroup Forum (February 2011) (20)

Alameda County 2011-12 Proposed Budget Overview
Alameda County 2011-12 Proposed Budget OverviewAlameda County 2011-12 Proposed Budget Overview
Alameda County 2011-12 Proposed Budget Overview
 
Fy2011 budget update
Fy2011 budget updateFy2011 budget update
Fy2011 budget update
 
Commissioner Bridget Gainer: Cook County Pension Committee Meeting - June 29,...
Commissioner Bridget Gainer: Cook County Pension Committee Meeting - June 29,...Commissioner Bridget Gainer: Cook County Pension Committee Meeting - June 29,...
Commissioner Bridget Gainer: Cook County Pension Committee Meeting - June 29,...
 
2010 State of the Community
2010 State of the Community2010 State of the Community
2010 State of the Community
 
Gfarmer Birmingham Visit 090409
Gfarmer Birmingham Visit 090409Gfarmer Birmingham Visit 090409
Gfarmer Birmingham Visit 090409
 
Final tax mod slides 12 09-12
Final tax mod slides 12 09-12Final tax mod slides 12 09-12
Final tax mod slides 12 09-12
 
2010 City Of Bethlehem Finance And Budget Presentation
2010 City Of Bethlehem Finance And Budget Presentation2010 City Of Bethlehem Finance And Budget Presentation
2010 City Of Bethlehem Finance And Budget Presentation
 
Oregon Economic and Revenue Forecast, December 2014
Oregon Economic and Revenue Forecast, December 2014Oregon Economic and Revenue Forecast, December 2014
Oregon Economic and Revenue Forecast, December 2014
 
Community Living Supports in the state of michigan
Community Living Supports in the state of michiganCommunity Living Supports in the state of michigan
Community Living Supports in the state of michigan
 
2014 State of the Community Report
2014 State of the Community Report2014 State of the Community Report
2014 State of the Community Report
 
Cavit Financial Model(1)
Cavit Financial Model(1)Cavit Financial Model(1)
Cavit Financial Model(1)
 
Long board surf loft 129,000
Long board surf loft 129,000Long board surf loft 129,000
Long board surf loft 129,000
 
Why Use Excel Pivot Tables
Why Use Excel Pivot TablesWhy Use Excel Pivot Tables
Why Use Excel Pivot Tables
 
Local Government Efficiency Grant
Local Government Efficiency GrantLocal Government Efficiency Grant
Local Government Efficiency Grant
 
2013 Executive Budget Recommendation Briefing
2013 Executive Budget Recommendation Briefing2013 Executive Budget Recommendation Briefing
2013 Executive Budget Recommendation Briefing
 
Admin Task Force Summary Charts
Admin Task Force Summary ChartsAdmin Task Force Summary Charts
Admin Task Force Summary Charts
 
Economic Development in Your Community: EAST REGION
Economic Development in Your Community: EAST REGIONEconomic Development in Your Community: EAST REGION
Economic Development in Your Community: EAST REGION
 
MA AMTA 52st Annual Meeting
MA AMTA 52st Annual MeetingMA AMTA 52st Annual Meeting
MA AMTA 52st Annual Meeting
 
2011 Benchmark Study
2011 Benchmark Study2011 Benchmark Study
2011 Benchmark Study
 
2012 City of Brandon Budget Highlights
2012 City of Brandon Budget Highlights2012 City of Brandon Budget Highlights
2012 City of Brandon Budget Highlights
 

Alameda County Budget Workgroup Forum (February 2011)

  • 1. County Administrator’s Office ALAMEDA COUNTY Economic and Budget Forum The Worst Is Yet to Come February 2011 Supervisor Keith Carson,Chair,Budget Workgroup Supervisor S per isor Wilma Chan Supervisor Scott Haggerty Susan S Muranishi County Administrator S. Muranishi,
  • 2. County Administrator’s Office Overview Economic Update FY 10‐11 Final Budget g State and Federal Budgets 2
  • 6. County Administrator’s Office Alameda County Unemployment  y p y by City/ Unincorporated Area 18% 16.3% 16% 15.6% 14% 12% 10% 7.8% 8% 6% 4.7% 4% 6
  • 7. County Administrator’s Office Alameda County Median Home Values July 2007 – Dec. 2010  650,000  650 000 619,000  600,000  550,000  500,000  450,000  400,000  400 000 350,000  347,000  300,000  280,000  250,000  200,000  7
  • 8. County Administrator’s Office Alameda County Property Foreclosures 9,000 , 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 4 000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 8 Source: Alameda County Clerk/Recorder’s Office
  • 9. County Administrator’s Office Assessment Roll—Percent Change Assessment Roll Percent Change Alameda County 18% 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% ‐2% ‐4% 9
  • 10. County Administrator’s Office Sales Tax Revenues 15,000,000 14,000,000 13,000,000 12,000,000 11,000,000 10,000,000 10 2004‐05 2005‐06 2006‐07 2007‐08 2008‐09 2009‐10 2010‐11
  • 11. County Administrator’s Office Prop. 172 Sales Tax Revenues $125,000,000 $125 000 000 $120,000,000 $115,000,000 $110,000,000 $105,000,000 $100,000,000 $95,000,000 11 2002‐03 2003‐04 2004‐05 2005‐06 2006‐07 2007‐08 2008‐09 2009‐10 2010‐11
  • 12. County Administrator’s Office Measure A Revenues—County Share $30,000,000 $30 000 000 $28,000,000 $26,000,000 $24,000,000 $22,000,000 12 2005‐2006 2006‐2007 2007‐2008 2008‐2009 2009‐2010 2010‐2011
  • 13. County Administrator’s Office Realignment Revenues 210,000,000 200,000,000 190,000,000 180,000,000 170,000,000 160,000,000 2003‐04 2004‐05 2005‐06 2006‐07 2007‐08 2008‐09 2009‐10 2010‐11 13
  • 14. County Administrator’s Office Quarterly Interest Rate for  Investment Pool 6% 5.0% 5% 4% 3% 2% 1% 0.5% 0% 14
  • 15. County Administrator’s Office Increased Demand for Services Dramatic increase in caseloads for assistance  programs, including: CalWORKs Food Stamps Medi‐Cal IHSS 15
  • 16. County Administrator’s Office CalWORKS 21,000 21 000 20,494 20,500 20,000 19,500 19,000 18,500 18,000 17,500 17,000 16,500 16,520 16,000 16
  • 17. County Administrator’s Office Medi-Cal 85,000 80,625 80,000 75,000 70,000 65,000 60,968 60,000 17
  • 18. County Administrator’s Office Food Stamps 43,500 , 40,435 38,500 33,500 28,500 23,500 18,500 13,500 8,569 8,500 18
  • 19. County Administrator’s Office General Assistance 11,000 11 000 10,000 9,000 9 000 8,000 7,000 , 6,240 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,622 3,000 19
  • 20. County Administrator’s Office In­Home Support Services 19,000 18,450 18,000 17,000 16,000 15,000 14,000 13,000 12,000 12 000 12,237 11,000 10,000 20
  • 21. County Administrator’s Office Economic Outlook Very slow recovery Unemployment still high Unemployment still high Home values way off peak Demand for services high Demand for services high Revenues down 21
  • 23.
  • 24. County Administrator’s Office ERAF Losses by Year (in millions) ERAF Losses by Year (in millions) Cumulative loss: $4 Billion $350  $350 $335 $320 $326 $320 $297 $300  $273 $263 $250  $236 $220 $206 $200  $187 $170 $158 $150  $140 $147 $129 $130 $135 $100  $50  $30 $0  24
  • 25. County Administrator’s Office Funding Gaps Since ERAF Intercept  F di  G  Si  ERAF I t t  (in millions) 25
  • 26. County Administrator’s Office Alameda C Al d County P Property T Di ib i Tax Distribution Of Each Dollar of Property Tax Collected: 26
  • 27. County Administrator’s Office FY 2010‐11 Final Budget Appropriation/  F.T.E.  Revenue Positions* All Funds $2.4 Billion 9,103 General/Grants/ $2.1 Billion 7,287 Measure A Fund *Full‐time equivalent positions  27
  • 28. County Administrator’s Office FY 2010 11 Final Budget  FY 2010‐11 Final Budget General/Grant/Measure A Funds Appropriation by Program General  Health Care  Government Capital Projects Services 10% 1% 27% Non Program  Expenditures Public Assistance 3% 32% Public Protection Contingency &  25% Reserves 2% Total Appropriation: $2.1 billion 28
  • 29. County Administrator’s Office FY 2010 11 Final Budget FY 2010‐11 Final Budget General/Grant/Measure A Funds Appropriation by Major Object Other  Salaries &  Financing Uses Benefits Other Charges 4% 39% 21% Fixed Assets 1% Services &  Supplies 35% Total Appropriation: $2.1 billion 29
  • 30. County Administrator’s Office FY 2010 11 Final Budget FY 2010‐11 Final Budget General/Grant/Measure A Funds Total Financing by Source Other Financing  Current Property Tax Sources 14% 6% Other Taxes 8% Other Revenue State/Federal/Local  3% Govt. Aid Charges for Services 54% 15% Total Financing: $2.1 billion 30
  • 31. County Administrator’s Office FY 2010‐11 Discretionary Revenue  Share of Total General Fund EPSDT  Capital  Discretionary  Designation Designation Revenue 1% 0% 26% Use of FMR U f FMR 3% Debt Service  Revenue Program Revenue 2% 68% Total General Fund:  $1.9 billion 31
  • 32. County Administrator’s Office FY 2010‐11 Discretionary Revenue by Source Vehicle License Fee  (ERAF) Other Revenue 30% 8% Interest on  Investments 1% Sales & Use Tax Property Tax Sales & Use Tax  2% 58% (ERAF) 1% Discretionary Revenue:  $502.7 million 32
  • 33. County Administrator’s Office FY 2010‐11 Use of Discretionary Revenue by Program Capital Projects General  1% Government 10% Debt Service Public Assistance 5% 13% Health Care Public Protection 17% 45% Contingency &  Contingency & Reserve Increase 9% Discretionary Revenue:  $502.7 million 33
  • 34. County Administrator’s Office FY 2010 11 Balancing Strategies FY 2010‐11 Balancing Strategies (in millions) Countywide  Fiscal Mgmt.  Strategies Reward 11% 40% Program  / Reductions/  EPSDT  EPSDT Revenue Designation 41% 8% Funding Gap:  $152.4 million 34 EPSDT = Early Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment Program
  • 35. County Administrator’s Office FY 2010 11  Closing the Gap FY 2010‐11 ‐ Closing the Gap Ongoing vs. One‐Time Strategies 35
  • 36. County Administrator’s Office Closing the Gap  General/Grant/Measure A Funds ($ in millions) Net County  Cost  FTE  Reduction Reductions General Government $22.7  16.9 Health Care Services $ $40.4 6.8 Public Assistance $30.1 +2.0 Public Protection Public Protection $42.8 83.9 Programs $136.0 105.6 Countywide Strategies Countywide Strategies $16.4  $16.4 0.0 Grand Total $152.4 105.6
  • 38. County Administrator’s Office President’s FY 2011 and 2012 Budgets FY 2011 $3.8 trillion plan proposed, not approved House Cmte proposes $100 billion cuts, largest in history H C $100 billi l i hi FY 2012  FY 2012 $3.7 trillion budget proposed $ $1.1 trillion discretionary spending y p g Over 200 programs to be cut or eliminated 38
  • 39. County Administrator’s Office Federal Budget Update Annual Deficits 2009: $1.4 trillion 2010: $1.3 trillion  2010 $1 3 t illi 2011: $1.6 trillion 2012: $1.1 trillion 2012: $1 1 trillion National Debt % GDP 2008: $6 trillion 40% 2010: $9 trillion 62% 2021: $18 trillion (est.) 2021 $18 illi ( ) 77% 39
  • 41. County Administrator’s Office Governor’s Budget $26.4 billion in solutions through 2011‐12 Cuts  $12.5 billion Revenues $12 billion Borrowing/transfers g/ $1.9 billion Realignment of services g Special election to extend tax increases 41
  • 42. County Administrator’s Office Governor s Budget  Governor’s Budget  Impact to AC Social Services Programs CalWORKS (20,500 AC recipients)  13% grant reduction ($18M cut to AC clients) 48‐month time limit ($24M impact to 4,000 families) 48 h l ($24  i    4 000 f ili ) Maintain block grant cut (ongoing AC loss $15M) Single Allocation reduction  (AC impact: $8M) Child Care Eliminate child care for 11 12 yr. olds (approx. 370 children) Eliminate child care for 11‐12 yr. olds (approx. 370 children) Decrease eligibility standards from 75% to 60% State median income Subsidies cut ($40M impact to AC clients) 42
  • 43. County Administrator’s Office Governor s Budget  Governor’s Budget  Impact to AC Social Services Programs (cont.) In Home Support Services (18,000 in AC) Cut provider hours 8.4% Cut domestic services in shared living environments (14,400 cases) C d h dl (14 400  ) AC Impact: Hours of service reduced 28% (6 million hours), wage loss  to IHSS providers: $71 million. SSI/SSP Grants (39,000 AC recipients; $7M impact) THP+ reduced allocation  (AC: $1.6M; 70 beds) Seriously, Emotionally Disturbed funding restored S i l E i ll Di b d f di d Suspend County Share of Child Support collections (AC: $0.6M) 43
  • 44. County Administrator’s Office Governor s Budget  Governor’s Budget  Impact to AC Health Programs  Medi‐Cal (up to 100,000 AC recipients affected) Caps on doctor visits, prescriptions, other services Co‐payments Caps on supplies, equipment, hearing aids, OTC drugs Eliminate Adult Day Health Care (880 people in AC) y ( p p ) 10% reduction in provider payments Use First Five funds for children svcs (7,200 AC children impacted) Healthy Families (est. 20,400 AC families) Increase premiums, co‐payments, cut vision benefit 44
  • 45. County Administrator’s Office Governor s Budget  Governor’s Budget  Other Eliminate redevelopment agencies  AC impact: $18M/year Reenactment of gas tax swap to fund transportation  Suspend, defer, repeal state mandates AC impact: $11M 45
  • 46. County Administrator’s Office Governor s Budget Governor’s Budget Realignment Phase 1 Transfer low‐level offenders, parole violators Transfer Adult parole Transfer remaining juvenile justice programs Transfer Court security to County sheriffs VLF‐funded programs: f d d COPS, JJCPA, Juvenile Probation, Booking Fees, CalMMEt, other Transfer fire protection and medical response in wildland Transfer fire protection and medical response in wildland areas 46
  • 47. County Administrator’s Office Governor’s Budget G ’  B d Realignment Phase 1 (cont.) Mental health services, using Prop. 63 funds Substance abuse programs Child Welfare Services/Foster Care Child W lf S i /F C Adult Protective Services 47
  • 48. County Administrator’s Office Governor’s Budget – G ’  B d   Realignment Phase 2 IHSS State CA Children’s Services  State CalWORKs Counties Child Care Counties Food Stamps Food Stamps Counties 48
  • 49. County Administrator’s Office Realignment Alameda County General Principles Constitutional protection that realigned programs will come  with adequate funding to cover costs Need all or some combination of the following: Guaranteed funding source Guaranteed funding source General Fund “backstop” Maximum local control/flexibility Ability to suspend, curtail or eliminate programs if funding is  insufficient 49
  • 50. County Administrator’s Office State Budget What if ballot initiatives fail? What if ballot initiati es fail? 50
  • 51. County Administrator’s Office Legislative Analyst: Possible Cuts If Voters Reject Taxes Schools Eliminate K-3 class size reduction Kindergarteners must be 5 years old Community Colleges 90-unit cap on subsidized credits Increase fees from $26/unit to $66/unit Cut State subsidy for athletics Universities Tuition: +7% UC, +10% CSU Personnel costs: -10% UC, -5% CSU 51
  • 52. County Administrator’s Office Legislative Analyst: Possible Cuts If Voters Reject Taxes Health/Human Services Reduce IHSS wage to minimum $300M Cut food and aid for noncitizens $190M Stricter income eligibility for welfare-to-work recipients $180M Public Safety Require 2nd, 3rd strikes be serious or violent $50M Eliminate public safety grants $506M Automated speed enforcement cameras $ p $150M Two furloughs/month for court employees $130M 52
  • 53. County Administrator’s Office Legislative Analyst: Possible Cuts If Voters Reject Taxes General Government Reduce State employee pay 9.4% $700M Reduce State employee health care 30% $330M Transportation Another accounting swap $400M Oil drilling at Tranquillon Ridge $100M New fee on residential property owners in wildlands $300M 53
  • 54. County Administrator’s Office Alameda County Ongoing Budget Policies Continue to monitor expenditures and revenues Restrict spending p g Pursue revenue enhancements Agencies & Departments directed to fill only critical (life/safety, mandated, cost effective) p positions 54
  • 55. County Administrator’s Office Pending Factors Economy Retirement/medical costs Federal budget and debt State Budget and June election Propositions 55
  • 56. County Administrator’s Office Key dates Budget Requests Due February 18, 2011 Early Budget Work Sessions April 5, 2011 Funding Gap identified Late March/early April Reduction plans May 2011 Proposed Budget Submitted d d S b d Early June 2011 l 2011 Final Budget Adopted Late June 2011 56
  • 57. County Administrator’s Office Alameda County Budget Information on the Web www.acgov.org/budget.htm www acgov org/budget htm 57
  • 58. County Administrator’s Office ALAMEDA COUNTY Economic and Budget Forum The Worst Is Yet to Come February 2011 Supervisor Keith Carson, Chair,Budget Workgroup Supervisor S per isor Wilma Chan Supervisor Scott Haggerty Susan S Muranishi County Administrator S. Muranishi,