In defiant ruling, Alabama Supreme Court stops similar-intercourse marriage in state - The Washingto...

1. Alabama Supreme Court halts gay-marriage licenses
In defiant ruling, Alabama Supreme Court stops similar-intercourse marriage in state - The
Washington Post
Angela Channell, appropriate, and Dawn Hicks, left, displayed their marriage on Feb. 13. Channell
and Hicks were the initial couple to apply for and obtain a marriage license from Tuscaloosa County,
Ala., for a identical intercourse marriage. (AP Photograph/The Tuscaloosa News, Robert Sutton)
The Alabama Supreme Court ordered a halt Tuesday to same-intercourse marriages in the state
regardless of a U.S. Supreme Court purchase allowing them to proceed. The ruling capped a wild
month of confusion and resistance in Alabama following a January determination by a U.S. district
court invalidating Alabama's ban on gay marriage.
The Alabama justices have been defiant. "As it has carried out for about two centuries," the court
stated, "Alabama law permits for 'marriage' involving only one particular man and one girl."
Alabama judges have a duty "not to situation any marriage license contrary to this law. Nothing at
all in the United States Constitution alters or overrides this duty."
The resistance in Alabama, in which states' rights has always been sacred writ and state supreme
court justices are elected rather than appointed, has been compared by several to that state's
resistance to school desegregation orders in the 1963, when Gov. George Wallace (D) stood in the
doorway of the University of Alabama to reduce the court-ordered enrollment of black college
students.
"The ruling of the Alabama Supreme Court presents the most forceful and obviously articulated
rebuttal to date of the imaginative arguments for exact same-sex 'marriage' employed by federal
courts," explained a statement from the Liberty Counsel, which challenged the reduced court ruling.
What occurs upcoming is unclear. Presumably someone will go back to the federal courts to overturn

2. the ruling. But quick of a ruling on gay marriage by the nation's highest court, which is not
anticipated for months, the standoff looks most likely to proceed. The Alabama court suggested that
it would be bound by the U.S. Supreme Court but practically nothing reduce than that.
Without a doubt, the state's highest court declared itself equally empowered as the decrease federal
courts to make a decision no matter whether Alabama's ban on identical-sex marriage violates the
Constitution -- stating unequivocally that it does not in what amounted to a broadside against the
trend of courts invalidating very same-sex marriage bans.
It accused other courts of using "sleight of hand" to confer "basic-rights status on a concept of
marriage divorced from its classic knowing."
"All through the entirety of its historical past, Alabama has selected the traditional definition of
marriage," the court said in a per curiam viewpoint, issued in the name of the court rather than a
specific justice. "... That reality does not change basically mainly because the new definition of
marriage has acquired ascendancy in selected quarters of the country, even if one of individuals
quarters is the federal judiciary."
"Marriage has always been involving members of the opposite sex," it mentioned. "The evident
purpose for this immutable characteristic is nature. Men and ladies complement every single other
biologically and socially. Perhaps even additional obvious, the sexual union concerning males and
girls (generally) produces little ones. ... In quick, government has an clear curiosity in offspring and
the consequences that flow from the creation."
That reasoning has been rejected by roughly 60 state and federal courts all-around the nation in the
previous number of years. But the state supreme court said that "state courts may perhaps interpret
the United States Constitution independently from, and even contrary to, federal courts" until the
point the place the nation's highest court has weighed in.
[Associated: Supreme Court refuses to hold back Alabama similar intercourse marriages]
[Judge tangled up above tying the knot]
That ought to transpire in a couple of months. In the meantime, the U.S. Supreme Court on Feb. 9
refused to remain the Alabama selection permitting exact same-sex marriage until eventually it does
rule, an action that was taken by court dissenter Justice Clarence Thomas as a signal on how the
high court will at some point resolve the challenge.
Many considered the U.S. Supreme Court's refusal to remain the lower court decision invalidating
the ban meant that Alabama had to, or ought to, comply and situation marriage licenses. But that
was not to be. About a third of the state's 67 counties started issuing licenses, but the other two-
thirds refused, citing a letter by Alabama's firebrand chief justice Roy Moore telling them to
disregard the federal court ruling. (Moore did not take part in yesterday's ruling.)

3. Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore. (AP Photo/Brynn Anderson)
Six of the court's nine justices concurred in yesterday's opinion. A seventh concurred in aspect and
there was a single dissent, primarily based not on constitutional problems but a contention that the
court did not have jurisdiction.
David Kennedy, a single of the attorneys who represented the Mobile couple who effectively
challenged Alabama's very same-sex marriage ban, advised Alabama.com last evening that he does
not think the state supreme court ruling would survive a challenge in federal court. "I never
seriously think that they can do that. I am not stunned, but I'm relatively appalled," he explained.
Kennedy said he believes that probate judges act "at their very own peril" if they pick to obey the
state court.
"When state law conflicts with federal law, federal law wins," he explained.
"The Alabama state Supreme Court does not have the authority to interfere with a federal court
buy," Human Rights Campaign legal director Sarah Warbelow advised Alabama.com. "This buy is
outrageous and baffling, and no volume of legalese can hide the bare animus that forms the
foundation of this extralegal ruling."
It can be not that basic, nonetheless, in accordance to scholars. Even though federal law and federal
rulings in the long run trump state law below the constitution's Supremacy Clause, a federal district
court buy to a distinct probate judge -- or marriage-license issuer -- does not always apply to any
individual else in the absence of a distinct order.
The Alabama Supreme Court ruling is here.
Additional from Morning Mix
The homeless guy killed by Los Angeles police: They nevertheless don't know his authentic identify