[To download this complete presentation, visit: https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations]
This introduction to Agile and Scrum is a presentation that provides a high-level overview of Agile and Scrum methodologies. The presentation is aimed at individuals who may have heard of Agile and Scrum but are not familiar with the concepts or principles.
The presentation begins with an introduction of the basic principles and values of Agile and Scrum, which includes an explanation of the Agile philosophy and principles, and an overview of the Scrum framework and its origins. It also discusses the benefits and drawbacks of Agile and Scrum and compares them to traditional project management methodologies.
The key roles and responsibilities within a Scrum team are discussed next, including the three key roles of Scrum Master, Product Owner, and Development Team. An explanation on how these roles interact with each other and the wider organization is provided.
The Scrum framework and its key components, including an overview of Sprints, Backlog, and Artifacts are also explained. The Scrum events, including Sprint Planning, Daily Scrum, Sprint Review, and Sprint Retrospective, are also covered.
Lastly, successful examples of how Agile and Scrum are used in various industries, such as software development, marketing, and education are presented. Discussions on how Agile and Scrum can be adapted to fit the needs of different projects and organizations are also provided.
By the end of the Agile and Scrum PPT presentation, attendees would have a solid foundation in Agile and Scrum methodologies, including a basic understanding of the principles and values, the Scrum framework and its key components, and the roles and responsibilities of the Scrum team. They would be equipped with the necessary knowledge to apply Agile and Scrum to their own work.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
1. Understand the basic principles, values, benefits and drawbacks of Agile and Scrum.
2. Understand the key roles of the Scrum team, and the Scrum framework and its key components.
3. Understand how Agile and Scrum can be applied to various industries and projects and adapted to fit different situations.
Learn about Agile Methodology of Software Engineering and study concepts like What is Agile, Why Agile is there, Agile Principles, Agile Manifesto with Pros & Cons of it.
Presentation also include Agile Testing Methodology like Scrum, Crystal Methodologies, DSDM, Feature Driven Development, Lean Software Development & Extreme Programming.
If you watch this one please rate it and do share this presentation to others so then can easily learn more about the Agile Methodology.
Agile is an iterative approach to project management and software development that helps teams deliver value to their customers faster and with fewer headaches. Instead of betting everything on a "big bang" launch, an agile team delivers work in small, but consumable, increments.
A brief that includes the following:
- Software Testing
- Quality Assurance
- Quality Control
- Types of Testing
- Levels of Software Testing
- Types of Performance Testing
- API
- Verification & Validation
- Test Plan & Testing Strategy
- Agile & Waterfall
- Software Development Life Cycle
- Career Path
Join BostonPHP and Michael Bourque as he presents the concept of Scrum and shows why so many people are now deploying scrum to their development projects. Michael will take us through the process and talk about how his company, Parametric Technology Inc. (PTC) , is successfully applying Scrum.
[To download this complete presentation, visit: https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations]
This introduction to Agile and Scrum is a presentation that provides a high-level overview of Agile and Scrum methodologies. The presentation is aimed at individuals who may have heard of Agile and Scrum but are not familiar with the concepts or principles.
The presentation begins with an introduction of the basic principles and values of Agile and Scrum, which includes an explanation of the Agile philosophy and principles, and an overview of the Scrum framework and its origins. It also discusses the benefits and drawbacks of Agile and Scrum and compares them to traditional project management methodologies.
The key roles and responsibilities within a Scrum team are discussed next, including the three key roles of Scrum Master, Product Owner, and Development Team. An explanation on how these roles interact with each other and the wider organization is provided.
The Scrum framework and its key components, including an overview of Sprints, Backlog, and Artifacts are also explained. The Scrum events, including Sprint Planning, Daily Scrum, Sprint Review, and Sprint Retrospective, are also covered.
Lastly, successful examples of how Agile and Scrum are used in various industries, such as software development, marketing, and education are presented. Discussions on how Agile and Scrum can be adapted to fit the needs of different projects and organizations are also provided.
By the end of the Agile and Scrum PPT presentation, attendees would have a solid foundation in Agile and Scrum methodologies, including a basic understanding of the principles and values, the Scrum framework and its key components, and the roles and responsibilities of the Scrum team. They would be equipped with the necessary knowledge to apply Agile and Scrum to their own work.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
1. Understand the basic principles, values, benefits and drawbacks of Agile and Scrum.
2. Understand the key roles of the Scrum team, and the Scrum framework and its key components.
3. Understand how Agile and Scrum can be applied to various industries and projects and adapted to fit different situations.
Learn about Agile Methodology of Software Engineering and study concepts like What is Agile, Why Agile is there, Agile Principles, Agile Manifesto with Pros & Cons of it.
Presentation also include Agile Testing Methodology like Scrum, Crystal Methodologies, DSDM, Feature Driven Development, Lean Software Development & Extreme Programming.
If you watch this one please rate it and do share this presentation to others so then can easily learn more about the Agile Methodology.
Agile is an iterative approach to project management and software development that helps teams deliver value to their customers faster and with fewer headaches. Instead of betting everything on a "big bang" launch, an agile team delivers work in small, but consumable, increments.
A brief that includes the following:
- Software Testing
- Quality Assurance
- Quality Control
- Types of Testing
- Levels of Software Testing
- Types of Performance Testing
- API
- Verification & Validation
- Test Plan & Testing Strategy
- Agile & Waterfall
- Software Development Life Cycle
- Career Path
Join BostonPHP and Michael Bourque as he presents the concept of Scrum and shows why so many people are now deploying scrum to their development projects. Michael will take us through the process and talk about how his company, Parametric Technology Inc. (PTC) , is successfully applying Scrum.
Agile/Scrum best Practices to improve quality.If some testing finds some defects, lot of testing would find lot of defects and improve quality. This presentation talks about few testing best practices that an agile team should follow for quality PI.
Comparative study on agile software development: Software development methodologies are constantly evolving due to changing technologies and new demands from users. Today’s dynamic business environment has given rise to emergent organizations that continuously adapt their structures, strategies, and policies to suit the new environment[12]. Such organizations need information systems that constantly evolve to meet their changing requirements. Though traditional software development methodologies, such as life cyclebased structured and object oriented approaches, continue to dominate the systems development few decades and much research has done in traditional methodologies, Agile software development brings its own set of novel challenges that must be addressed to satisfy the customer through early and continuous delivery of the valuable software. It’s a set of best practice that allows rapid delivery of high quality software to meet customer needs and also accommodate changes in the requirements.[13] Traditional, plan-driven software development methodologies lack the flexibility to dynamically adjust the development process. Agile development is the ability to develop software quickly keeping pace with the rapidly changing requirements. We speculate that from the need to satisfy the customer through early and continuous delivery of the valuable software, Agile software development is emerged. In this paper, we provide a brief comparison of agile development methodologies with traditional systems development methodologies, and discuss the challenges of adopting agile methodologies. A number of software development methods such as extreme programming (XP), feature-driven development, crystal clear method, scrum, dynamic systems development, and adaptive software development are also briefly discussed in this paper.
We are doing Agile well..We have been Agile now.. Is it just an assumption or do we have data to support it? Do metrics add any value or they are just a fad? Good metrics affirm & reinforce Agile principles. They open up the conversation and help the teams to improve. They are not only for management, it is for everyone who wants to inspect and adapt.
So this presentation is about how metrics can be used effectively in Agile to enable transparency and improve the overall efficiency at the team/ program and portfolio level.
Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) in the TrenchesYuval Yeret
eBook by AgileSparks - curated blog posts, guidance articles, implementation approaches - all based on AgileSparks and specifically Yuval Yeret's experience implementing SAFe in the trenches.
Agile vs. waterfall - The fundamentals differencesDavid Tzemach
In this presentation I will review the main differences between waterfall and agile methodology, this presentation is a great place to start if you want to know why more and more companies are using agile as the preferred development methodology.
Building Quality In in SAFe – The Testing Organization’s Perspective Yuval Yeret
SAFe emphasizes Building Quality In. We will take a deep dive into how this looks from a testing organization’s perspective and what does a SAFe implementation mean for Testing/QA professionals. We will map SAFe’s approach to best practices in the “”Agile Testing”” world. We will look at examples from the real world of how traditional testing organizations shift left and evolve towards continuous testing.
Learning Objectives and Key Takeaways:
Understand how best practices from the “”Agile Testing”” world map to SAFe’s context
Learn ideas and patterns for evolving Testing/QA’s role during a SAFe implementation
Understand how Test-Driven looks like and how techniques like Acceptance-Test-Driven-Design/Behavior-Driven
Development can empower testers as well as improve the flow on SAFe agile teams.
See how SAFe’s principles can be used to guide the evolution towards a lean/agile testing organization
Agile/Scrum best Practices to improve quality.If some testing finds some defects, lot of testing would find lot of defects and improve quality. This presentation talks about few testing best practices that an agile team should follow for quality PI.
Comparative study on agile software development: Software development methodologies are constantly evolving due to changing technologies and new demands from users. Today’s dynamic business environment has given rise to emergent organizations that continuously adapt their structures, strategies, and policies to suit the new environment[12]. Such organizations need information systems that constantly evolve to meet their changing requirements. Though traditional software development methodologies, such as life cyclebased structured and object oriented approaches, continue to dominate the systems development few decades and much research has done in traditional methodologies, Agile software development brings its own set of novel challenges that must be addressed to satisfy the customer through early and continuous delivery of the valuable software. It’s a set of best practice that allows rapid delivery of high quality software to meet customer needs and also accommodate changes in the requirements.[13] Traditional, plan-driven software development methodologies lack the flexibility to dynamically adjust the development process. Agile development is the ability to develop software quickly keeping pace with the rapidly changing requirements. We speculate that from the need to satisfy the customer through early and continuous delivery of the valuable software, Agile software development is emerged. In this paper, we provide a brief comparison of agile development methodologies with traditional systems development methodologies, and discuss the challenges of adopting agile methodologies. A number of software development methods such as extreme programming (XP), feature-driven development, crystal clear method, scrum, dynamic systems development, and adaptive software development are also briefly discussed in this paper.
We are doing Agile well..We have been Agile now.. Is it just an assumption or do we have data to support it? Do metrics add any value or they are just a fad? Good metrics affirm & reinforce Agile principles. They open up the conversation and help the teams to improve. They are not only for management, it is for everyone who wants to inspect and adapt.
So this presentation is about how metrics can be used effectively in Agile to enable transparency and improve the overall efficiency at the team/ program and portfolio level.
Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe) in the TrenchesYuval Yeret
eBook by AgileSparks - curated blog posts, guidance articles, implementation approaches - all based on AgileSparks and specifically Yuval Yeret's experience implementing SAFe in the trenches.
Agile vs. waterfall - The fundamentals differencesDavid Tzemach
In this presentation I will review the main differences between waterfall and agile methodology, this presentation is a great place to start if you want to know why more and more companies are using agile as the preferred development methodology.
Building Quality In in SAFe – The Testing Organization’s Perspective Yuval Yeret
SAFe emphasizes Building Quality In. We will take a deep dive into how this looks from a testing organization’s perspective and what does a SAFe implementation mean for Testing/QA professionals. We will map SAFe’s approach to best practices in the “”Agile Testing”” world. We will look at examples from the real world of how traditional testing organizations shift left and evolve towards continuous testing.
Learning Objectives and Key Takeaways:
Understand how best practices from the “”Agile Testing”” world map to SAFe’s context
Learn ideas and patterns for evolving Testing/QA’s role during a SAFe implementation
Understand how Test-Driven looks like and how techniques like Acceptance-Test-Driven-Design/Behavior-Driven
Development can empower testers as well as improve the flow on SAFe agile teams.
See how SAFe’s principles can be used to guide the evolution towards a lean/agile testing organization
STX Next - Scrum Development Process OverviewSTX Next
An overview of Software Development Process at STX Next presenting basic SCRUM ceremonies and workflows. To learn more about STX Next visit https://stxnext.com
Agile Testing Leadership Lessons for the Test & QA Professionals
Silicon India Software Testing Conference - SOFTEC - 2 July 2011
Bangalore
Presentation from Speaker: Vaidyanathan Ramalingam,
Director Engineering (Test), Huawei Technologies R&D, Bangalore
Coverage:
1) Waterfall Testing Vs Agile Testing
2) Testing Checklist - 5W & 2H
3) Trade Off Economics in Testing
4) Software Testing Eco System
5) RCA (Root Cause Analysis)
Cotact: rvaidya67@hotmail.com
Linked-In: Vaidyanathan Ramalingam
Agile Testing Leadership Lessons for the Test & QA Professionals
Silicon India Software Testing Conference - SOFTEC - 2 July 2011
Bangalore
Presentation from Speaker: Vaidyanathan Ramalingam,
Director Engineering (Test), Huawei Technologies R&D, Bangalore
Coverage:
1) Waterfall Testing Vs Agile Testing
2) Testing Checklist - 5W & 2H
3) Trade Off Economics in Testing
4) Software Testing Eco System
5) RCA (Root Cause Analysis)
Agile Testing Leadership Lessons for the Test & QA Professionals
Silicon India Software Testing Conference - SOFTEC - 2 July 2011
Bangalore
Presentation from Speaker: Vaidyanathan Ramalingam,
Director Engineering (Test), Huawei Technologies R&D, Bangalore
Coverage:
1) Waterfall Testing Vs Agile Testing
2) Testing Checklist - 5W & 2H
3) Trade Off Economics in Testing
4) Software Testing Eco System
5) RCA (Root Cause Analysis)
Agile Testing Leadership Lessons for the Test & QA Professionals
Silicon India Software Testing Conference - SOFTEC - 2 July 2011
Bangalore
Presentation from Speaker: Vaidyanathan Ramalingam,
Director Engineering (Test), Huawei Technologies R&D, Bangalore
Coverage:
1) Waterfall Testing Vs Agile Testing
2) Testing Checklist - 5W & 2H
3) Trade Off Economics in Testing
4) Software Testing Eco System
5) RCA (Root Cause Analysis)
Cotact: rvaidya67@hotmail.com
Linked-In: Vaidyanathan Ramalingam
Agile Testing Leadership Lessons for the Test & QA Professionals
Silicon India Software Testing Conference - SOFTEC - 2 July 2011
Bangalore
Presentation from Speaker: Vaidyanathan Ramalingam,
Director Engineering (Test), Huawei Technologies R&D, Bangalore
Coverage:
1) Waterfall Testing Vs Agile Testing
2) Testing Checklist - 5W & 2H
3) Trade Off Economics in Testing
4) Software Testing Eco System
5) RCA (Root Cause Analysis)
Agile Testing Leadership Lessons for the Test & QA Professionals
Silicon India Software Testing Conference - SOFTEC - 2 July 2011
Bangalore
Presentation from Speaker: Vaidyanathan Ramalingam,
Director Engineering (Test), Huawei Technologies R&D, Bangalore
Coverage:
1) Waterfall Testing Vs Agile Testing
2) Testing Checklist - 5W & 2H
3) Trade Off Economics in Testing
4) Software Testing Eco System
5) RCA (Root Cause Analysis)
Agile Testing Leadership Lessons for the Test & QA Professionals
Silicon India Software Testing Conference - SOFTEC - 2 July 2011
Bangalore
Presentation from Speaker: Vaidyanathan Ramalingam,
Director Engineering (Test), Huawei Technologies R&D, Bangalore
Coverage:
1) Waterfall Testing Vs Agile Testing
2) Testing Checklist - 5W & 2H
3) Trade Off Economics in Testing
4) Software Testing Eco System
5) RCA (Root Cause Analysis)
Cotact: rvaidya67@hotmail.com
Linked-In: Vaidyanathan Ramalingam
Agile Testing Leadership Lessons for the Test & QA Professionals
Silicon India Software Testing Conference - SOFTEC - 2 July 2011
Bangalore
Presentation from Speaker: Vaidyanathan Ramalingam,
Director Engineering (Test), Huawei Technologies R&D, Bangalore
Coverage:
1) Waterfall Testing Vs Agile Testing
2) Testing Checklist - 5W & 2H
3) Trade Off Economics in Testing
4) Software Testing Eco System
5) RCA (Root Cause Analysis)
Agile Testing Leadership Lessons for the Test & QA Professionals
Silicon India Software Testing Conference - SOFTEC - 2 July 2011
Bangalore
Presentation from Speaker: Vaidyanathan Ramalingam,
Director Engineering (Test), Huawei Technologies R&D, Bangalore
Coverage:
1) Waterfall Testing Vs Agile Testing
2) Testing Checklist - 5W & 2H
3) Trade Off Economics in Testing
4) Software Testing Eco System
5) RCA (Root Cause Analysis)
First Steps with Globus Compute Multi-User EndpointsGlobus
In this presentation we will share our experiences around getting started with the Globus Compute multi-user endpoint. Working with the Pharmacology group at the University of Auckland, we have previously written an application using Globus Compute that can offload computationally expensive steps in the researcher's workflows, which they wish to manage from their familiar Windows environments, onto the NeSI (New Zealand eScience Infrastructure) cluster. Some of the challenges we have encountered were that each researcher had to set up and manage their own single-user globus compute endpoint and that the workloads had varying resource requirements (CPUs, memory and wall time) between different runs. We hope that the multi-user endpoint will help to address these challenges and share an update on our progress here.
Exploring Innovations in Data Repository Solutions - Insights from the U.S. G...Globus
The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has made substantial investments in meeting evolving scientific, technical, and policy driven demands on storing, managing, and delivering data. As these demands continue to grow in complexity and scale, the USGS must continue to explore innovative solutions to improve its management, curation, sharing, delivering, and preservation approaches for large-scale research data. Supporting these needs, the USGS has partnered with the University of Chicago-Globus to research and develop advanced repository components and workflows leveraging its current investment in Globus. The primary outcome of this partnership includes the development of a prototype enterprise repository, driven by USGS Data Release requirements, through exploration and implementation of the entire suite of the Globus platform offerings, including Globus Flow, Globus Auth, Globus Transfer, and Globus Search. This presentation will provide insights into this research partnership, introduce the unique requirements and challenges being addressed and provide relevant project progress.
Listen to the keynote address and hear about the latest developments from Rachana Ananthakrishnan and Ian Foster who review the updates to the Globus Platform and Service, and the relevance of Globus to the scientific community as an automation platform to accelerate scientific discovery.
Understanding Globus Data Transfers with NetSageGlobus
NetSage is an open privacy-aware network measurement, analysis, and visualization service designed to help end-users visualize and reason about large data transfers. NetSage traditionally has used a combination of passive measurements, including SNMP and flow data, as well as active measurements, mainly perfSONAR, to provide longitudinal network performance data visualization. It has been deployed by dozens of networks world wide, and is supported domestically by the Engagement and Performance Operations Center (EPOC), NSF #2328479. We have recently expanded the NetSage data sources to include logs for Globus data transfers, following the same privacy-preserving approach as for Flow data. Using the logs for the Texas Advanced Computing Center (TACC) as an example, this talk will walk through several different example use cases that NetSage can answer, including: Who is using Globus to share data with my institution, and what kind of performance are they able to achieve? How many transfers has Globus supported for us? Which sites are we sharing the most data with, and how is that changing over time? How is my site using Globus to move data internally, and what kind of performance do we see for those transfers? What percentage of data transfers at my institution used Globus, and how did the overall data transfer performance compare to the Globus users?
How Recreation Management Software Can Streamline Your Operations.pptxwottaspaceseo
Recreation management software streamlines operations by automating key tasks such as scheduling, registration, and payment processing, reducing manual workload and errors. It provides centralized management of facilities, classes, and events, ensuring efficient resource allocation and facility usage. The software offers user-friendly online portals for easy access to bookings and program information, enhancing customer experience. Real-time reporting and data analytics deliver insights into attendance and preferences, aiding in strategic decision-making. Additionally, effective communication tools keep participants and staff informed with timely updates. Overall, recreation management software enhances efficiency, improves service delivery, and boosts customer satisfaction.
OpenMetadata Community Meeting - 5th June 2024OpenMetadata
The OpenMetadata Community Meeting was held on June 5th, 2024. In this meeting, we discussed about the data quality capabilities that are integrated with the Incident Manager, providing a complete solution to handle your data observability needs. Watch the end-to-end demo of the data quality features.
* How to run your own data quality framework
* What is the performance impact of running data quality frameworks
* How to run the test cases in your own ETL pipelines
* How the Incident Manager is integrated
* Get notified with alerts when test cases fail
Watch the meeting recording here - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbNOje0kf6E
AI Fusion Buddy Review: Brand New, Groundbreaking Gemini-Powered AI AppGoogle
AI Fusion Buddy Review: Brand New, Groundbreaking Gemini-Powered AI App
👉👉 Click Here To Get More Info 👇👇
https://sumonreview.com/ai-fusion-buddy-review
AI Fusion Buddy Review: Key Features
✅Create Stunning AI App Suite Fully Powered By Google's Latest AI technology, Gemini
✅Use Gemini to Build high-converting Converting Sales Video Scripts, ad copies, Trending Articles, blogs, etc.100% unique!
✅Create Ultra-HD graphics with a single keyword or phrase that commands 10x eyeballs!
✅Fully automated AI articles bulk generation!
✅Auto-post or schedule stunning AI content across all your accounts at once—WordPress, Facebook, LinkedIn, Blogger, and more.
✅With one keyword or URL, generate complete websites, landing pages, and more…
✅Automatically create & sell AI content, graphics, websites, landing pages, & all that gets you paid non-stop 24*7.
✅Pre-built High-Converting 100+ website Templates and 2000+ graphic templates logos, banners, and thumbnail images in Trending Niches.
✅Say goodbye to wasting time logging into multiple Chat GPT & AI Apps once & for all!
✅Save over $5000 per year and kick out dependency on third parties completely!
✅Brand New App: Not available anywhere else!
✅ Beginner-friendly!
✅ZERO upfront cost or any extra expenses
✅Risk-Free: 30-Day Money-Back Guarantee!
✅Commercial License included!
See My Other Reviews Article:
(1) AI Genie Review: https://sumonreview.com/ai-genie-review
(2) SocioWave Review: https://sumonreview.com/sociowave-review
(3) AI Partner & Profit Review: https://sumonreview.com/ai-partner-profit-review
(4) AI Ebook Suite Review: https://sumonreview.com/ai-ebook-suite-review
#AIFusionBuddyReview,
#AIFusionBuddyFeatures,
#AIFusionBuddyPricing,
#AIFusionBuddyProsandCons,
#AIFusionBuddyTutorial,
#AIFusionBuddyUserExperience
#AIFusionBuddyforBeginners,
#AIFusionBuddyBenefits,
#AIFusionBuddyComparison,
#AIFusionBuddyInstallation,
#AIFusionBuddyRefundPolicy,
#AIFusionBuddyDemo,
#AIFusionBuddyMaintenanceFees,
#AIFusionBuddyNewbieFriendly,
#WhatIsAIFusionBuddy?,
#HowDoesAIFusionBuddyWorks
How to Position Your Globus Data Portal for Success Ten Good PracticesGlobus
Science gateways allow science and engineering communities to access shared data, software, computing services, and instruments. Science gateways have gained a lot of traction in the last twenty years, as evidenced by projects such as the Science Gateways Community Institute (SGCI) and the Center of Excellence on Science Gateways (SGX3) in the US, The Australian Research Data Commons (ARDC) and its platforms in Australia, and the projects around Virtual Research Environments in Europe. A few mature frameworks have evolved with their different strengths and foci and have been taken up by a larger community such as the Globus Data Portal, Hubzero, Tapis, and Galaxy. However, even when gateways are built on successful frameworks, they continue to face the challenges of ongoing maintenance costs and how to meet the ever-expanding needs of the community they serve with enhanced features. It is not uncommon that gateways with compelling use cases are nonetheless unable to get past the prototype phase and become a full production service, or if they do, they don't survive more than a couple of years. While there is no guaranteed pathway to success, it seems likely that for any gateway there is a need for a strong community and/or solid funding streams to create and sustain its success. With over twenty years of examples to draw from, this presentation goes into detail for ten factors common to successful and enduring gateways that effectively serve as best practices for any new or developing gateway.
Developing Distributed High-performance Computing Capabilities of an Open Sci...Globus
COVID-19 had an unprecedented impact on scientific collaboration. The pandemic and its broad response from the scientific community has forged new relationships among public health practitioners, mathematical modelers, and scientific computing specialists, while revealing critical gaps in exploiting advanced computing systems to support urgent decision making. Informed by our team’s work in applying high-performance computing in support of public health decision makers during the COVID-19 pandemic, we present how Globus technologies are enabling the development of an open science platform for robust epidemic analysis, with the goal of collaborative, secure, distributed, on-demand, and fast time-to-solution analyses to support public health.
Check out the webinar slides to learn more about how XfilesPro transforms Salesforce document management by leveraging its world-class applications. For more details, please connect with sales@xfilespro.com
If you want to watch the on-demand webinar, please click here: https://www.xfilespro.com/webinars/salesforce-document-management-2-0-smarter-faster-better/
Climate Science Flows: Enabling Petabyte-Scale Climate Analysis with the Eart...Globus
The Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) is a global network of data servers that archives and distributes the planet’s largest collection of Earth system model output for thousands of climate and environmental scientists worldwide. Many of these petabyte-scale data archives are located in proximity to large high-performance computing (HPC) or cloud computing resources, but the primary workflow for data users consists of transferring data, and applying computations on a different system. As a part of the ESGF 2.0 US project (funded by the United States Department of Energy Office of Science), we developed pre-defined data workflows, which can be run on-demand, capable of applying many data reduction and data analysis to the large ESGF data archives, transferring only the resultant analysis (ex. visualizations, smaller data files). In this talk, we will showcase a few of these workflows, highlighting how Globus Flows can be used for petabyte-scale climate analysis.
OpenFOAM solver for Helmholtz equation, helmholtzFoam / helmholtzBubbleFoamtakuyayamamoto1800
In this slide, we show the simulation example and the way to compile this solver.
In this solver, the Helmholtz equation can be solved by helmholtzFoam. Also, the Helmholtz equation with uniformly dispersed bubbles can be simulated by helmholtzBubbleFoam.
Large Language Models and the End of ProgrammingMatt Welsh
Talk by Matt Welsh at Craft Conference 2024 on the impact that Large Language Models will have on the future of software development. In this talk, I discuss the ways in which LLMs will impact the software industry, from replacing human software developers with AI, to replacing conventional software with models that perform reasoning, computation, and problem-solving.
We describe the deployment and use of Globus Compute for remote computation. This content is aimed at researchers who wish to compute on remote resources using a unified programming interface, as well as system administrators who will deploy and operate Globus Compute services on their research computing infrastructure.
Globus Connect Server Deep Dive - GlobusWorld 2024Globus
We explore the Globus Connect Server (GCS) architecture and experiment with advanced configuration options and use cases. This content is targeted at system administrators who are familiar with GCS and currently operate—or are planning to operate—broader deployments at their institution.
Unleash Unlimited Potential with One-Time Purchase
BoxLang is more than just a language; it's a community. By choosing a Visionary License, you're not just investing in your success, you're actively contributing to the ongoing development and support of BoxLang.
3. ITERATIVE Model
1Code
1 Test
2Code
2 Test
3Code
3 Test
1A 2A 3A 4A 5A
1D 2D 3D 4D 5D
4Code
4 Test
5Code
5 Test
ANALYSIS
DESIGN
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
A
D
c
T
Iterative Model
For a small set of functionality
Analysis & Design will be
completed first before
proceeding to Coding & Testing
within same iteration.
Project Time line
25% 50% 75% 100%
6. 6
Process vs Project Triangle
ADC
A
D
C
T
A
D
C
TT
Schedule Schedule Schedule
WATER FALL ITERATIVE AGILE - SCRUM
Waterfall Iterative Agile
Format Test Match: Strategic-
Phase by Phase like
Innings by Innings.
Game for Specialists.
Slow and Steady.
One Day: Strategic approach –
First10/Middle/Slog overs.
Mix of Specialists and
All-Rounders.
Result oriented.
T20: Lively , Dynamic, Full of
Action. Game for All-Rounders.
Changes with every over.
Highly Result oriented
7. Agile vs Iterative vs Waterfall
{Process}
{Planning}
{Execution}
{Completion}
8. 8
Agile vs Iterative vs Waterfall – {Process}
Waterfall Iterative (hybrid) Agile
Quality Quality focus changes
from Analysis > Design
> Code > Test
Quality focus shifts
between Analysis/Design
phase to Coding/Testing
phase
Quality focus on all aspects
of SDLC at any given time.
Quality Control Detection & fixing
during system and
regression testing at the
last phase of project.
Early detection & fixing in
each iteration for new
features. Followed by
regression testing.
Early detection & fixing in
each sprint followed by
stabilization.
Continual
Improvement
(CA & PA)
Lessons learned from
previous release
implemented in next
release
Lessons learned from
previous Iteration
implemented in next
Iteration.
Lessons learned from
previous sprint implemented
in next sprint
Risk No Risk Identification.
Firefighting during
testing phase.
Risk identification &
mitigation in dev & test
phase of each iteration.
Early identification &
mitigation in every sprint.
Postmortem/
Retrospection
After every release After every iteration/
milestone
After every sprint in
retrospection meeting
Customer
Feed back
At the end of the
project.
At the end of every
iteration
At the end of every sprint 4
Less Agile
More Agile
9. 9
Practice Waterfall Iterative (hybrid) Agile
Goals Goals are defined for
each phase by defining
entry and exit criteria.
Delivering artifacts by
phase wise.
Completion of analysis &
design for a set of features
by one team followed by
completion of code & test
by another team.
Completing the feature/story
in all aspects within a sprint.
Delivering the shippable
product.
Definition of
Ready
Analysis and design
should be completed for
all stories before
programming
Analysis and design should
be completed for a ‘set of
stories’ before
programming
Stories that are not subjected
to change, that can be
completed (analysis to demo)
within the sprint will be
considered for the sprint.
Scoping Product Owner (PO)
decides project scope
Project Manager (PM)
decides scope for iteration
in consultation with
Product Owner
Team decides the sprint
scope as per the capacity
availability & product backlog
prioritization
Agile vs Iterative vs Waterfall – {Planning}
Less Agile
More Agile
10. 10
Practice Waterfall Iterative (hybrid) Agile
Effort
Estimation
PM provides estimates
and get approval from
PO for entire project.
Project Manager (PM)
provides the estimation
for each iteration.
Scrum Master facilitates and
Team does the estimation.
Story points can be reviewed
and refined during sprint
planning meeting.
Scheduling Scheduled by phase wise
milestones – Analysis,
Design, Development
and Testing
Scheduled based on
Iteration wise delivery
commitments –
Iternation#1, #2, #3, #4,
etc.,
Scheduled based on velocity
and Release backlog.
Time boxed in short cycles of
duration say 1wk, 2wks, or
3wks – Sprint#1,#2,#3,#4, etc.,
Plan Review Team need to stick to
baseline project plan.
Team need to stick to
baseline iteration plan
Team can review during mid
sprint planning
Agile vs Iterative vs Waterfall – {Planning}
Less Agile
More Agile
11. 11
Practice Waterfall Iterative (hybrid) Agile
Phase silos or
Role silos or
Story silos
Analysis and design will
be completed for all
stories before
proceeding to coding and
testing. Lag by phase.
Within in the team, analysts &
architects work on analysis &
design of future stories and pass
it to the remaining team to work
on coding & testing of those
stories. Lag by phase with overlap
Team gets divided into mini
teams and each min team
focus on story completion in
all aspects – analysis, design,
development, test, doc,
delivery. There is no lag.
Resource
Utilization
Role specific. Resources
restricted to the tasks
that suits/matches their
role only.
Role switch over rarely seen.
Resources extend only on need
basis.
Role switchover common.
Everybody is ready to work on
any task
(analysis/design/dev/test) to
complete the story.
Ownership Ownership changes from
role to role by phase to
phase. Roles play key
role. PM responsible for
overall delivery.
PM is responsible for getting the
iteration completed.
Entire team is responsible for
story completion in all
aspects – analysis, design,
development, testing and
demo.
Task
Assignment
Project Manager do the
feature/task
assignment for entire
project.
PM influence the feature/task
assignment for entire iteration.
Team members are
empowered to own the
feature/tasks for every
sprint
Agile vs Iterative vs Waterfall – {Execution}
Less Agile
More Agile
12. 12
Practice Waterfall Iterative (hybrid) Agile
Daily Standup Daily/Weekly Status
reports. PM calls for
the status meeting at
scheduled intervals
Daily/Weekly Status
reports. PM calls for the
status meeting at
scheduled intervals.
Scrum Master facilitates the
daily standup meeting to
update:
• what we did?,
• what we are going to do?
• where we lag?
Status Report Status report in
prescribed template.
More focus on
Percentage done.
Status report in
prescribed template.
More focus on
Percentage done.
Update on daily basis by
logging hours spent & hours
required to complete.
Burndown/Burnup chart
reflects the remaining hours
required to complete
Planned vs
Actual
Stick to baseline
project plan
Stick to baseline iteration
plan
Actual hours burnt vs hours
required to complete
Agile vs Iterative vs Waterfall – {Execution}
Less Agile
More Agile
13. 13
Practice Waterfall Iterative (hybrid) Agile
Testing Resources Only Testers will
identify, prepare, and
execute the TCs.
Only Testers will identify,
prepare, and execute the
TCs.
Any one in the team
identify, prepare and
execute TCs.
New Feature Testing TC preparation and
execution starts after
analysis, design and
development phase.
TC preparation and
execution starts after
analysis and design phase.
TC preparation and
execution starts in parallel
with analysis and design
and completes within same
sprint.
Regression Testing After the completion
of first cycle system
testing.
Partial coverage within the
iteration and full coverage
in stabilization iteration.
Full coverage within the
sprint.
Stabilization Phase NA. Full scale regression testing
after the completion of
development iterations.
No feature development.
Only defect fix.
Performance, deployment,
migration testing after the
completion of development
sprints.
No feature development.
Only defect fix.
Agile vs Iterative vs Waterfall – {Execution}
Less Agile
More Agile
14. 14
Practice Waterfall Iterative (hybrid) Agile
Definition of
Done
DOD for a story will be
measured by phase wise
delivery of artifacts (req. doc,
design doc, test cases, code)
which are validated,
reviewed, approved, baseline
and delivered at the end of
respective phase.
DOD will be measured by
phase wise delivery of set
of features - analysis &
design in one phase and
development & testing in
followed phase with in
same iteration.
DOD for a story will be
measured by its capability
of demonstration and
delivery to the external
world.
Story Closing Delivering/Publishing artifacts
(DOD) phase by phase
Closing analysis & design
stories. Closing code & test
stories.
Closing the story based
on demo feedback, test
case results (90% pass)
and defect status (no
critical & high defects)
Delivery Delivering artifacts phase
wise and delivery of working
software at end of the
project.
Delivering working software
at the end of each Iteration.
Demonstration and
delivering working
software at the end of
every sprint.
Agile vs Iterative vs Waterfall – {Completion}
Less Agile
More Agile