THE INFLUENCE OF EMOTICONS ON
   RECEIVER PERCEPTION
       LAUREN DEINTINIS
         FAITH GOVAN
       BRIAN MCELVENEY


      PENN STATE BEHREND
Source: www.glasbergen.com
Electronic Communication
• 87% of teens engage in some form of
  electronic communication (Pew Internet
  Project, 2008)
• 43% of teenagers now say texting is the
  number one reason they get a cell phone
  (Nielson, 2010)
• Voice usage has decreased by 14% among
  teens and is decreasing in all age groups
  under 55 (Nielson, 2010)
Research Topic
• Increase in Electronic and Computer-
  Mediated Communication

     Loss of Non-verbal cues
• Scott Fahlman creates the “Smiley” in 1981



     :-)           :-(           ;-)
Previous Research
• Some non-verbal information is not
  transferred fully (McKenna & Bargh, 2000).
• Emoticons support written communication
  like non-verbal cues (Rezabek and
  Cochenour, 1998)
• Emoticons affect emotions felt in receiver
  (Luor, Wu, Lu & Tao, 2010)
Research Questions
• Who uses emoticons?
• How are emoticons used?
• Do emoticons affect the impression of
  another’s personality in an online chat?
Participants
• 77 Participants
  – 35 Males, 42 Females
  – 18-39 years old, M=19 years old
• Research Participation Pool
• Ethical Guidelines and Informed consent
  following IRB approval
Materials
Materials
Perception Questionnaire
1     2     3    4      5    6    7    8 9
(1=Strongly Disagree, 5=Neutral, 9=Strongly Agree)
•My chat partner is a likeable person.
•My chat partner is persuasive in his/her argument.
•I enjoyed communicating with this person.
•I would communicate with this person again.
•I use emoticons in everyday non-verbal communication.
•I only use emoticons in conversations with friends and family.
•I use emoticons more when my conversation partner uses emoticons.
•I use emoticons to express humor.
•I use emoticons to express sarcasm.
•I use emoticons to express sadness.
Materials
Big Five Personality Questionnaire (Saucier, 1994)
•Forty-item inventory
•Measured five personality traits:
   –   Openness
   –   Contentiousness
   –   Extraversion
   –   Agreeableness
   –   Emotional Stability
Informed Consent

                                     Participant
                                    Questionnaire

                                      Big Five
                                    Questionnaire

                                     Chat About
                                    “Dry Campus”
                                        Article

                 Positive      Negative        Wink    None


                                      Big Five
                                    Questionnaire

                                     Perception
                                    Questionnaire

                                  Debriefing/Credite
Source: www.cultureflock.com               d
Emoticon use in everyday
        communication

   R 2 = .12, F = 3.21, p = .028*
– Agreeableness         β = .19, p = .096
– Extraversion          β = .14, p = .222
– Emotional Stability   β = -.26, p = .022*
Using Emoticons to Express Humor?


    R 2 = .20, F = 6.09, p = .001*
 – Agreeableness         β = .26, p = .031*
 – Conscientiousness     β = .26, p = .028*
 – Emotional Stability   β = -.21, p = .049*
Results: Big Five Personality Ratings Based
             on Emoticon Type




F (3, 73) = 2.94, p = .039*   F (3,73) = .877, p = .457
F (3, 73) = .844, p = .474    F (3,73) = .623, p = .602
F (3, 73) = 1.27, p = .291
Results: Chat Analyses
Discussion
• Less emotionally stable and the more agreeable, more
  likely to use emoticons.
• Chat partners are seen as more agreeable when they pair
  optimistic messages with positive emoticons
    – (Luor, Wu, Lu, and Tao, 2010)
• Participant’s perceived extraversion rating higher when a
  wink emoticon and support statement of campus going dry
  was used
    – Participants may have perceived the wink as a form of
      sarcasm (Walther and D’Addario, 2001)
Limitations
• Participants
  – Limited to college students only
  – Small sample size
• Time constraints
  – Unable to look at both FOR and AGAINST
    arguments
• Many variables
  – Larger interactions could not be analyzed at this
    point in research
Implications
• Emoticons do affect the emotions felt by the
  receiver of a message
• Personality does play a role in how
  emoticons are perceived in a message




       Source:
References
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank our faculty advisor, Dr.
 Dawn Blasko, for her continued support and
guidance throughout the duration of the study.
 We would also like to thank Dr. Robert Light,
 the senior associate dean of the Penn State
 Behrend Research Office, for supporting this
         study with a research grant.

Advanced Research Project

  • 1.
    THE INFLUENCE OFEMOTICONS ON RECEIVER PERCEPTION LAUREN DEINTINIS FAITH GOVAN BRIAN MCELVENEY PENN STATE BEHREND
  • 2.
  • 3.
    Electronic Communication • 87%of teens engage in some form of electronic communication (Pew Internet Project, 2008) • 43% of teenagers now say texting is the number one reason they get a cell phone (Nielson, 2010) • Voice usage has decreased by 14% among teens and is decreasing in all age groups under 55 (Nielson, 2010)
  • 4.
    Research Topic • Increasein Electronic and Computer- Mediated Communication Loss of Non-verbal cues • Scott Fahlman creates the “Smiley” in 1981 :-) :-( ;-)
  • 5.
    Previous Research • Somenon-verbal information is not transferred fully (McKenna & Bargh, 2000). • Emoticons support written communication like non-verbal cues (Rezabek and Cochenour, 1998) • Emoticons affect emotions felt in receiver (Luor, Wu, Lu & Tao, 2010)
  • 6.
    Research Questions • Whouses emoticons? • How are emoticons used? • Do emoticons affect the impression of another’s personality in an online chat?
  • 7.
    Participants • 77 Participants – 35 Males, 42 Females – 18-39 years old, M=19 years old • Research Participation Pool • Ethical Guidelines and Informed consent following IRB approval
  • 8.
  • 9.
    Materials Perception Questionnaire 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 (1=Strongly Disagree, 5=Neutral, 9=Strongly Agree) •My chat partner is a likeable person. •My chat partner is persuasive in his/her argument. •I enjoyed communicating with this person. •I would communicate with this person again. •I use emoticons in everyday non-verbal communication. •I only use emoticons in conversations with friends and family. •I use emoticons more when my conversation partner uses emoticons. •I use emoticons to express humor. •I use emoticons to express sarcasm. •I use emoticons to express sadness.
  • 10.
    Materials Big Five PersonalityQuestionnaire (Saucier, 1994) •Forty-item inventory •Measured five personality traits: – Openness – Contentiousness – Extraversion – Agreeableness – Emotional Stability
  • 11.
    Informed Consent Participant Questionnaire Big Five Questionnaire Chat About “Dry Campus” Article Positive Negative Wink None Big Five Questionnaire Perception Questionnaire Debriefing/Credite Source: www.cultureflock.com d
  • 13.
    Emoticon use ineveryday communication R 2 = .12, F = 3.21, p = .028* – Agreeableness β = .19, p = .096 – Extraversion β = .14, p = .222 – Emotional Stability β = -.26, p = .022*
  • 14.
    Using Emoticons toExpress Humor? R 2 = .20, F = 6.09, p = .001* – Agreeableness β = .26, p = .031* – Conscientiousness β = .26, p = .028* – Emotional Stability β = -.21, p = .049*
  • 15.
    Results: Big FivePersonality Ratings Based on Emoticon Type F (3, 73) = 2.94, p = .039* F (3,73) = .877, p = .457 F (3, 73) = .844, p = .474 F (3,73) = .623, p = .602 F (3, 73) = 1.27, p = .291
  • 16.
  • 17.
    Discussion • Less emotionallystable and the more agreeable, more likely to use emoticons. • Chat partners are seen as more agreeable when they pair optimistic messages with positive emoticons – (Luor, Wu, Lu, and Tao, 2010) • Participant’s perceived extraversion rating higher when a wink emoticon and support statement of campus going dry was used – Participants may have perceived the wink as a form of sarcasm (Walther and D’Addario, 2001)
  • 18.
    Limitations • Participants – Limited to college students only – Small sample size • Time constraints – Unable to look at both FOR and AGAINST arguments • Many variables – Larger interactions could not be analyzed at this point in research
  • 19.
    Implications • Emoticons doaffect the emotions felt by the receiver of a message • Personality does play a role in how emoticons are perceived in a message Source:
  • 20.
  • 21.
    Acknowledgments We would liketo thank our faculty advisor, Dr. Dawn Blasko, for her continued support and guidance throughout the duration of the study. We would also like to thank Dr. Robert Light, the senior associate dean of the Penn State Behrend Research Office, for supporting this study with a research grant.

Editor's Notes

  • #13 Examples of Google chats
  • #14 By using the participants personality traits, agreeableness, extraversion, and emotional stability, being the most impactful on the results, we were able to explain 11.6% of the variance of those who use emoticons in everyday use. By using the participants personality traits, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and emotional stability, being the most impactful on the results, we were able to explain 20% of the variance of those who use emoticons to express humor. Overall, emotional stability had the greatest effect on predicting emoticon use. (More neurotic (less emotionally stable)= more emoticon use)
  • #15 By using the participants personality traits, agreeableness, extraversion, and emotional stability, being the most impactful on the results, we were able to explain 11.6% of the variance of those who use emoticons in everyday use. By using the participants personality traits, agreeableness, conscientiousness, and emotional stability, being the most impactful on the results, we were able to explain 20% of the variance of those who use emoticons to express humor. Overall, emotional stability had the greatest effect on predicting emoticon use. (More neurotic (less emotionally stable)= more emoticon use)