“If physicians would read two
articles per day out of the six
million medical articles
published annually, in one year,
they would fall 82 centuries
behind in their reading.”
Miser WF, Critical Appraisal of the Literature. J Am
Board Fam Pract, 12(4):315-333, 1999.
Acute Coronary
Syndromes
Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of death
in the United States.
Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) includes any
constellation of symptoms compatible with acute
myocardial ischemia:
 Acute MI (AMI) with ST-segment elevation and depression
 Q-wave and non-Q wave
 Unstable Angina (UA)
Acute Coronary
Syndromes
Can also be divided into:
STEMI
UA
NSTEMI
The implication of ACS is for early diagnosis for
appropriate clinical management, and
placement in an environment with continuous
EKG and defibrillation capability, where an EKG
can be obtained and immediately interpreted.
Priority is to identify patients with AMI to be
considered for immediate reperfusion Rx, and
recognize other potential catastrophic causes of
sudden decompensation such as aortic
dissection.
ST-Elevation Myocardial
Infarction (STEMI)
Pre-hospital Management
Initial Management in the ER
Reperfusion Therapy
Initial Adjunctive Treatments
Risk Stratification after MI
Pre-hospital
Management
Time is myocardium, regardless of the
strategy to reperfusion.
Prompt reperfusion:
 limits myocardial necrosis
 Preserves LV function
 Reduces mortality
Pre-hospital
Management
Most pts don’t seek care for 2 or more hours
Pts should promptly administer ASA
Dial 911
EMS should take pt to facility that can do PCI
16% reduction in mortality in pts given
thrombolytic Rx before hospitalization
? Safety of Rx before correct dx & selection
Initial Management in the
ER
Initial Management in
the ER
STEMI Protocols in the ER result in
rapid ID and Rx
Initial diagnostic tests:
 EKG
 continuous monitoring of rhythm, HR & BP
 targeted Hx and PE
 stat blood for cardiac markers, heme, chemistry
clotting and lipids
 chest X-ray
Selecting Optimal
Reperfusion Rx for Pts with
STEMI
Reperfusion Therapy
Success depends on time to therapy
< 30 minutes for thrombolytic rx >
< 90 minutes for primary PCI
Both are effective for achieving
reperfusion
PCI in STEMI
If it can be done rapidly, less risk of
recurrent MI
Stents better than POBA:
 < restenosis, better success rates
PCI not Available
Or Long Door to Balloon (DB) Time
Peripheral Hospital
> mortality if DB time is > 2 hours
If DB time > 1 hour, PCI is no better
than fibrinolytic Rx
Initial Adjunctive
Treatments
Platelet activation and aggregation are
important in STEMI causing persistence
of thrombotic occlusions and resistance
to fibrinolytic Rx and risk of reocclusion.
Pathways leading to platelet activation
and aggregation are thus targets of
therapy.
Initial Adjunctive
Treatments
ASA given to all (160 – 325mg)
Plavix in pts allergic to ASA
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for all
undergoing PCI
Thrombin Inhibitors (UFH or LMWH)
O2
NTG
IV B-blockers
ACE-I
Analgesia
Risk Stratification after
MI
Ischemic Risk
LV Function
Arrhythmic Substrate
Ischemic Risk
Identifying residual ischemia is to
identify high-risk pts who will benefit
from revascularization.
Post MI stress test – not necessary in
pts who had PCI
LV Function
LV function and Valvular disease
usually assessed with
echocardiography
Myocardial stunning may persist for 2
weeks
Assessment of Risk for
Arrhythmia
Important to assess risk or early or late
arrhythmic deaths is important after
STEMI
ICD implants in pts with low LVEF after
MI reduces mortality
Accuracy of prediction is not good
Unstable Angina and
Non--ST-Segment
Elevation MI
UA and NSTEMI
UA and NSTEMI
1.5 million patients annually admitted to
hospitals in US
Many advances in last few years:
 Antiplatelet therapies
 Cholesterol lowering
 B-blockade
ACC/AHA
Overview of Guidelines
Features with Higher
Liklihood of ACS
TIMI Risk Score for UA/NSTEMI
Predicts Risk of Death, MI, or
Recurrent Ischemia
Effects of Plavix Stratified by
TIMI Risk Score at 12 Months
Benefit of IIb/IIIa Inhibitors in
UA/NSTEMI by Troponin
Antiplatelet Treatment
Antiplatelet Therapy is the
Cornerstone in the Management
of UA/NSTEMI
Antiplatement Therapy
ASA reduces events by 50% to 70%
compared with placebo. (160-325mg in
hospital, 81mg at discharge).
Plavix (Clopidogrel) in patients who
cannot take ASA.
Antiplatement Therapy
Clopidogrel is a class I recommendation in
addition to ASA
CURE Trial Clopidogrel + ASA had 20%
reduction of CV death, MI and stroke vs ASA
alone in both high and low risk pts with
UA/NSTEMI.
The benefits were seen at 2 hours and 1
year. 31% reduction in cardiac events at 1
and 12 months
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa
Inhibitors
Upstream Management with Integrilin
(eptifibatide) shows clear benefit,
Reopro (abciximab) none in pts treated
conservatively
Aciximab is strongly beneficial in pts
undergoing PCI
Pts at high risk benefit from GP IIb/IIIa
inhibitors
UFH and LMWH
All pts with US/NSTEMI
Incremental benefit over ASA alone
Lovenox (enoxaparin) (LMWH) superior
to UFH in reducing recurrent cardiac
events
Beware of pts with bleeding histories
Invasive vs Conservative
Strategy
Especially in high risk pts (ST changes and
Tp positive
An early invasive strategy is cost-
effective with a cost of $17,500 per life
saved
Summary of Hospital
Strategy
Summary of Invasive
Strategy
Long Term Therapy
Acute Coronary Syndromes physical and medical treatment
Acute Coronary Syndromes physical and medical treatment
Acute Coronary Syndromes physical and medical treatment

Acute Coronary Syndromes physical and medical treatment

  • 1.
    “If physicians wouldread two articles per day out of the six million medical articles published annually, in one year, they would fall 82 centuries behind in their reading.” Miser WF, Critical Appraisal of the Literature. J Am Board Fam Pract, 12(4):315-333, 1999.
  • 2.
    Acute Coronary Syndromes Coronary arterydisease is the leading cause of death in the United States. Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) includes any constellation of symptoms compatible with acute myocardial ischemia:  Acute MI (AMI) with ST-segment elevation and depression  Q-wave and non-Q wave  Unstable Angina (UA)
  • 4.
    Acute Coronary Syndromes Can alsobe divided into: STEMI UA NSTEMI
  • 5.
    The implication ofACS is for early diagnosis for appropriate clinical management, and placement in an environment with continuous EKG and defibrillation capability, where an EKG can be obtained and immediately interpreted. Priority is to identify patients with AMI to be considered for immediate reperfusion Rx, and recognize other potential catastrophic causes of sudden decompensation such as aortic dissection.
  • 6.
    ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) Pre-hospitalManagement Initial Management in the ER Reperfusion Therapy Initial Adjunctive Treatments Risk Stratification after MI
  • 7.
    Pre-hospital Management Time is myocardium,regardless of the strategy to reperfusion. Prompt reperfusion:  limits myocardial necrosis  Preserves LV function  Reduces mortality
  • 8.
    Pre-hospital Management Most pts don’tseek care for 2 or more hours Pts should promptly administer ASA Dial 911 EMS should take pt to facility that can do PCI 16% reduction in mortality in pts given thrombolytic Rx before hospitalization ? Safety of Rx before correct dx & selection
  • 9.
  • 10.
    Initial Management in theER STEMI Protocols in the ER result in rapid ID and Rx Initial diagnostic tests:  EKG  continuous monitoring of rhythm, HR & BP  targeted Hx and PE  stat blood for cardiac markers, heme, chemistry clotting and lipids  chest X-ray
  • 11.
  • 13.
    Reperfusion Therapy Success dependson time to therapy < 30 minutes for thrombolytic rx > < 90 minutes for primary PCI Both are effective for achieving reperfusion
  • 14.
    PCI in STEMI Ifit can be done rapidly, less risk of recurrent MI Stents better than POBA:  < restenosis, better success rates
  • 15.
    PCI not Available OrLong Door to Balloon (DB) Time Peripheral Hospital > mortality if DB time is > 2 hours If DB time > 1 hour, PCI is no better than fibrinolytic Rx
  • 16.
    Initial Adjunctive Treatments Platelet activationand aggregation are important in STEMI causing persistence of thrombotic occlusions and resistance to fibrinolytic Rx and risk of reocclusion. Pathways leading to platelet activation and aggregation are thus targets of therapy.
  • 17.
    Initial Adjunctive Treatments ASA givento all (160 – 325mg) Plavix in pts allergic to ASA Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors for all undergoing PCI Thrombin Inhibitors (UFH or LMWH) O2 NTG IV B-blockers ACE-I Analgesia
  • 18.
    Risk Stratification after MI IschemicRisk LV Function Arrhythmic Substrate
  • 19.
    Ischemic Risk Identifying residualischemia is to identify high-risk pts who will benefit from revascularization. Post MI stress test – not necessary in pts who had PCI
  • 20.
    LV Function LV functionand Valvular disease usually assessed with echocardiography Myocardial stunning may persist for 2 weeks
  • 21.
    Assessment of Riskfor Arrhythmia Important to assess risk or early or late arrhythmic deaths is important after STEMI ICD implants in pts with low LVEF after MI reduces mortality Accuracy of prediction is not good
  • 23.
  • 25.
    UA and NSTEMI 1.5million patients annually admitted to hospitals in US Many advances in last few years:  Antiplatelet therapies  Cholesterol lowering  B-blockade
  • 26.
  • 27.
  • 28.
  • 29.
    TIMI Risk Scorefor UA/NSTEMI Predicts Risk of Death, MI, or Recurrent Ischemia
  • 30.
    Effects of PlavixStratified by TIMI Risk Score at 12 Months
  • 31.
    Benefit of IIb/IIIaInhibitors in UA/NSTEMI by Troponin
  • 32.
    Antiplatelet Treatment Antiplatelet Therapyis the Cornerstone in the Management of UA/NSTEMI
  • 33.
    Antiplatement Therapy ASA reducesevents by 50% to 70% compared with placebo. (160-325mg in hospital, 81mg at discharge). Plavix (Clopidogrel) in patients who cannot take ASA.
  • 34.
    Antiplatement Therapy Clopidogrel isa class I recommendation in addition to ASA CURE Trial Clopidogrel + ASA had 20% reduction of CV death, MI and stroke vs ASA alone in both high and low risk pts with UA/NSTEMI. The benefits were seen at 2 hours and 1 year. 31% reduction in cardiac events at 1 and 12 months
  • 35.
    Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors Upstream Managementwith Integrilin (eptifibatide) shows clear benefit, Reopro (abciximab) none in pts treated conservatively Aciximab is strongly beneficial in pts undergoing PCI Pts at high risk benefit from GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors
  • 36.
    UFH and LMWH Allpts with US/NSTEMI Incremental benefit over ASA alone Lovenox (enoxaparin) (LMWH) superior to UFH in reducing recurrent cardiac events Beware of pts with bleeding histories
  • 39.
    Invasive vs Conservative Strategy Especiallyin high risk pts (ST changes and Tp positive
  • 40.
    An early invasivestrategy is cost- effective with a cost of $17,500 per life saved
  • 42.
  • 43.
  • 44.