Actus reus الركن المادى للجريمة
•
0 likes•65 views
This document discusses the concept of actus reus, which is the physical or external element of a crime. It explains that for a crime to occur there must be both an actus reus (physical act) and mens rea (guilty mind). The act must be voluntary - it cannot be something involuntary like sleepwalking. Examples of actus reus include taking property for theft or unlawfully killing for murder. Mere thoughts or status are not enough to constitute an actus reus. Omissions can also qualify as an actus reus if there is a legal duty to act. Possession requires knowing control over an item. The act must also be the factual and proximate cause of the prohibited result for
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Chip Fullmer Arrested
Investigators from the Nevada County District Attorney's Office and sheriff's deputies arrested Martin Zane Fullmer, 63, on suspicion of sexually abusing two minors. Fullmer was booked into the Nevada County jail on a $150,000 bond. The District Attorney said information from an August report led to the arrest warrant, and investigators moved to arrest Fullmer as it appeared he was trying to leave town while recovering from an alleged suicide attempt.
bankruptcy Houston Texas
This document provides contact information for a bankruptcy attorney in Houston, Texas named Busby P.C. located at 2909 Hillcroft Suite 350 Houston, Texas 77057 and their phone number is 713-974-1151. The document encourages those seeking bankruptcy assistance to contact this law firm.
Nhan nguyen
A wrongful death lawsuit in Arizona allows surviving family members to seek damages for the death of a loved one caused by someone else's negligence or recklessness. To win a case, the plaintiff must prove the defendant's actions caused the death and that the family suffered financial and emotional losses. Damages awarded can cover funeral costs, lost income, and loss of companionship. Plaintiffs have two years from the date of death to file a lawsuit, though this deadline may be extended if an injury was not discovered immediately. Consulting a lawyer can help determine if a wrongful death claim is possible within the statute of limitations.
Domestic violence act 2005, India
MAITRI is a humanitarian and developmental NGO established in 2005. Its mission is to
establish basic health, promote education and restore human rights to empower India’s
vulnerable populations. Maitri defends human rights and strengthens communities through
individual and community empowerment with advocacy, education, community-based program
development, and networking. Maitri is committed to improving the quality of life and dignity
of the vulnerable populations it works with, which include:
● Destitute and marginalised widows
● Migrant workers and their families
● Underprivileged children
2015 Hit and Run Campaign Speech February 16, 2015
Jamie McWilliams' son Justin was killed in 2002 when he was hit by a vehicle at a party and the driver left the scene without stopping. Charges against the driver were later dropped due to a loophole in Florida law not applying hit and run laws to private property. McWilliams began campaigning to change the law and in 2006 the Justin McWilliams Act was passed, making it a felony to leave the scene of a fatal accident on public or private property. Since then, additional laws have been passed increasing penalties for hit and run crashes and awareness campaigns, giving McWilliams hope and helping her find comfort and healing in educating others to honor her son's memory.
Chicago Law Bulletin February 8, 2011
A downstate judge ordered $1.4 million in damages in a hate crimes lawsuit involving the vicious attack of three young black men by a group of white men in Manteno, Illinois in 2005. The Chicago Lawyers' Committee and Katten Muchin Rosenman law firm represented the victims in the civil suit. The judge awarded $240,000 in compensatory damages and $1.2 million in punitive damages. Two of the defendants had previously settled out of court. The four remaining defendants were each found liable for $480,000. The large judgment aimed to condemn the racially motivated violence and validate the victims' suffering.
Wrongful Death: Understanding Your Options in Tennessee
This document provides information about wrongful death lawsuits in Tennessee. It defines wrongful death as any loss of life resulting from an injury. Surviving family members, such as spouses, children, or parents, may be entitled to compensation through a wrongful death lawsuit seeking both economic damages like lost future wages and non-economic damages for loss of companionship or emotional distress. Plaintiffs have two years to file a wrongful death suit from the date of death. Hiring an experienced wrongful death attorney is recommended to navigate the complex legal process.
Payne v Tennessee
The Supreme Court overturned previous rulings and held that the Eighth Amendment does not prohibit victim impact statements during capital sentencing. Pervis Payne was convicted of murdering Charisse Christopher and her daughter Lacie. At sentencing, Charisse's mother testified about the impact of their murders on Nicholas, the surviving son. The Court found such testimony relevant to assessing the harm caused by Payne and his moral culpability. Three justices dissented, arguing victim impact sheds no light on guilt and allows death sentences based on emotion rather than reason.
Recommended
Chip Fullmer Arrested
Investigators from the Nevada County District Attorney's Office and sheriff's deputies arrested Martin Zane Fullmer, 63, on suspicion of sexually abusing two minors. Fullmer was booked into the Nevada County jail on a $150,000 bond. The District Attorney said information from an August report led to the arrest warrant, and investigators moved to arrest Fullmer as it appeared he was trying to leave town while recovering from an alleged suicide attempt.
bankruptcy Houston Texas
This document provides contact information for a bankruptcy attorney in Houston, Texas named Busby P.C. located at 2909 Hillcroft Suite 350 Houston, Texas 77057 and their phone number is 713-974-1151. The document encourages those seeking bankruptcy assistance to contact this law firm.
Nhan nguyen
A wrongful death lawsuit in Arizona allows surviving family members to seek damages for the death of a loved one caused by someone else's negligence or recklessness. To win a case, the plaintiff must prove the defendant's actions caused the death and that the family suffered financial and emotional losses. Damages awarded can cover funeral costs, lost income, and loss of companionship. Plaintiffs have two years from the date of death to file a lawsuit, though this deadline may be extended if an injury was not discovered immediately. Consulting a lawyer can help determine if a wrongful death claim is possible within the statute of limitations.
Domestic violence act 2005, India
MAITRI is a humanitarian and developmental NGO established in 2005. Its mission is to
establish basic health, promote education and restore human rights to empower India’s
vulnerable populations. Maitri defends human rights and strengthens communities through
individual and community empowerment with advocacy, education, community-based program
development, and networking. Maitri is committed to improving the quality of life and dignity
of the vulnerable populations it works with, which include:
● Destitute and marginalised widows
● Migrant workers and their families
● Underprivileged children
2015 Hit and Run Campaign Speech February 16, 2015
Jamie McWilliams' son Justin was killed in 2002 when he was hit by a vehicle at a party and the driver left the scene without stopping. Charges against the driver were later dropped due to a loophole in Florida law not applying hit and run laws to private property. McWilliams began campaigning to change the law and in 2006 the Justin McWilliams Act was passed, making it a felony to leave the scene of a fatal accident on public or private property. Since then, additional laws have been passed increasing penalties for hit and run crashes and awareness campaigns, giving McWilliams hope and helping her find comfort and healing in educating others to honor her son's memory.
Chicago Law Bulletin February 8, 2011
A downstate judge ordered $1.4 million in damages in a hate crimes lawsuit involving the vicious attack of three young black men by a group of white men in Manteno, Illinois in 2005. The Chicago Lawyers' Committee and Katten Muchin Rosenman law firm represented the victims in the civil suit. The judge awarded $240,000 in compensatory damages and $1.2 million in punitive damages. Two of the defendants had previously settled out of court. The four remaining defendants were each found liable for $480,000. The large judgment aimed to condemn the racially motivated violence and validate the victims' suffering.
Wrongful Death: Understanding Your Options in Tennessee
This document provides information about wrongful death lawsuits in Tennessee. It defines wrongful death as any loss of life resulting from an injury. Surviving family members, such as spouses, children, or parents, may be entitled to compensation through a wrongful death lawsuit seeking both economic damages like lost future wages and non-economic damages for loss of companionship or emotional distress. Plaintiffs have two years to file a wrongful death suit from the date of death. Hiring an experienced wrongful death attorney is recommended to navigate the complex legal process.
Payne v Tennessee
The Supreme Court overturned previous rulings and held that the Eighth Amendment does not prohibit victim impact statements during capital sentencing. Pervis Payne was convicted of murdering Charisse Christopher and her daughter Lacie. At sentencing, Charisse's mother testified about the impact of their murders on Nicholas, the surviving son. The Court found such testimony relevant to assessing the harm caused by Payne and his moral culpability. Three justices dissented, arguing victim impact sheds no light on guilt and allows death sentences based on emotion rather than reason.
Defences For The Accused
The document discusses various defences that can be used in criminal cases, including denial of the crime, justifications, mental states, mental disorders, intoxication, self-defence, necessity, compulsion/duress, provocation, and battered woman's syndrome. It provides details on the legal requirements and tests for each defence. Key points include that mental disorder can be used as a defence if the accused was unable to appreciate the nature of their actions or know they were wrong. Intoxication is generally not a defence but may be in cases of specific intent or extreme intoxication. Self-defence must use reasonable force, while defence of property allows greater force. Battered woman's syndrome provides context for why an abused
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
The document discusses the extent to which criminal law relating to omissions reflects the view that law should encourage citizens to do 'the right thing' and not fail to help those in need. Generally under common law, omissions cannot constitute offenses. However, the law has recognized limited liability for omissions where a duty to act exists, such as statutory, contractual, or familial duties. The law's recognition of duty situations encourages citizens to act when they can reasonably help those in need, reflecting the idea that law should promote moral behavior. However, some argue it is difficult to define clear duty situations and imposing broad duties could threaten individual freedom and overwhelm the legal system.
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
This document provides profiles of several notorious UK serial killers:
1. Peter Sutcliffe (The Yorkshire Ripper) murdered 13 women in the late 1970s and attacked 7 others. He claimed to hear voices telling him to kill prostitutes.
2. Fred and Rose West tortured, sexually abused, and murdered at least 12 people in Gloucester in the 1970s-80s. Fred West killed himself in prison in 1995 while awaiting trial. Rose West was convicted of 10 murders.
3. Harold Shipman is considered the most prolific serial killer in UK history, having been found responsible for the deaths of at least 215 patients via lethal injections as their family doctor over 23 years. He hanged himself
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
The document discusses several issues and defences related to criminal law, including insanity and automatism defences. It notes that the burden of proof differs depending on whether the defence or prosecution raises insanity, which may confuse juries. The definition of insanity has also been criticized as outdated and irrelevant. The effectiveness of the verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity is also questioned. Reforms to modernize rules around fitness to plead and legal insanity are needed to make the law consistent with modern psychiatric understanding.
Steven is on trial for the murder of a man named Joseph. At first .docx
Steven is on trial for the murder of a man named Joseph. At first glance, the case constitutes a crime and punishment under the law. It appears that Steven committed an unlawful act voluntarily and had the full intention of doing so. Based on this evidence alone, Steven has fulfilled the definition of committing a crime.
The criminal court system intends to provide justice to those involved in the court process. Let’s take a closer look at the events that unfolded on the night that Joseph was killed. Steven was alone inside his one-bedroom apartment in the city. It was late at night, and he was almost asleep when he heard someone break the padlock on the door and enter his apartment. The man moved directly up to Stephen’s bedroom and forced the locked door open. Joseph had broken into Steven’s home with the intent to injure and possibly kill Steven. Once he had gained entry into the room, the intruder, Joseph, first tried to strangle the unsuspecting homeowner, but when it was clear that Steven might overpower him, Joseph removed a revolver from his back pocket and shot at Steven twice. To protect himself from serious bodily harm, Steven dislodged himself from his potential killer, moved to his kitchen, and stabbed Joseph with a kitchen knife. As Steven moves through the court process, his lawyer is likely to use the fact that the act was self-defense to prove that Steven is not legally guilty for his actions and should not be found guilty of murder under the law.
Steven is on trial for the murder of a man named Joseph. At first glance, the case constitutes a crime and punishment under the law. It appears that Steven committed an unlawful act voluntarily and had the full intention of doing so. Based on this evidence alone, Steven has fulfilled the definition of committing a crime.
The criminal court system intends to provide justice to those involved in the court process. Let’s take a closer look at the events that unfolded on the night that Joseph was killed. Steven was alone inside his one-bedroom apartment in the city. It was late at night, and he was almost asleep when he heard someone break the padlock on the door and enter his apartment. The man moved directly up to Stephen’s bedroom and forced the locked door open. Joseph had broken into Steven’s home with the intent to injure and possibly kill Steven. Once he had gained entry into the room, the intruder, Joseph, first tried to strangle the unsuspecting homeowner, but when it was clear that Steven might overpower him, Joseph removed a revolver from his back pocket and shot at Steven twice. To protect himself from serious bodily harm, Steven dislodged himself from his potential killer, moved to his kitchen, and stabbed Joseph with a kitchen knife. As Steven moves through the court process, his lawyer is likely to use the fact that the act was self-defense to prove that Steven is not legally guilty for his actions and should not be found guilty of murder under the law.
For an act to be .
Introduction.pdf
The Supreme Court analyzed two cases dealing with convictions under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012. In both cases, the High Court had ignored POCSO provisions and convicted the accused of minor offenses under the Indian Penal Code. The Supreme Court held that Section 7 of POCSO does not require skin-to-skin contact and that any act done with sexual intent that involves physical contact can be considered sexual assault. The Court also discussed how Sections 29 and 30 of POCSO create mandatory presumptions around an accused's guilt and mental state that must be considered and can only be rebutted with clear evidence proving innocence beyond reasonable doubt.
BASIC LAW CONCEPTS: OFFENCES & DEFENSES
This 3-page document contains definitions and examples of offences and defenses in English Common Law and applies to Commonwealth countries like the UK, NZ and Australia. Useful for beginner Law and Forensic Psychology students.
1-131118073532-phpapp02.pdf
This document provides an overview of the key concepts of criminal liability under Malaysian law, including the definition of a crime, elements of a crime (actus reus and mens rea), and discussions of actus reus. It defines a crime and notes that every crime has its own specific definition. It explains that for criminal liability to exist, there must generally be an unlawful act (actus reus) accompanied by a blameworthy state of mind (mens rea). The document then discusses actus reus in depth, including that it can involve an act, omission, or circumstance, and must be voluntary. It provides examples of when an omission can form the basis of criminal liability and discusses the defense of automat
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Murder requires the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought. There are two types of intent that can demonstrate malice: direct intent to kill or cause serious harm, or indirect/oblique intent where death or serious injury were foreseeable consequences of the defendant's actions. The defendant's actions must also be both the factual and legal cause of death. There are several defenses that can reduce murder to manslaughter, including diminished responsibility, loss of self-control due to provocation, insanity per the M'Naghten rules, and automatism. Intoxication can prevent formation of intent, and unlawful act manslaughter involves death resulting from a dangerous criminal act. Gross negligence manslaughter involves owed duty of care,
The criminal code of canada
The document outlines various criminal offences in Canada, including their elements and classifications. It discusses violent offences like homicide, murder, manslaughter, and assault. It also covers sexual assault and identifies three levels based on severity of the crime. Motor vehicle offences in the Criminal Code like dangerous operation and hit-and-run are explained. Impaired driving laws and penalties for exceeding blood alcohol limits while operating a vehicle are also summarized.
Principles of criminal liability
Criminal liability requires proving five key principles: actus reus, mens rea, concurrence, causation, and resulting harm. Actus reus refers to a criminal act. Mens rea refers to criminal intent. Concurrence means the act and intent occurred together. Causation means the act caused the result. Each principle involves complex legal issues that prosecutors must address when bringing charges. Presumptions in criminal cases are meant to simplify trials, not substitute for evidence of a crime.
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
The document discusses two criminal defenses - insanity and intoxication - and argues that both are in need of reform. Regarding insanity, it notes that the legal definition has not changed significantly since 1842 and is considered obsolete and medically irrelevant. It also examines problems with applying the defense, including indefinite detention. For intoxication, it finds the law is based more on public policy than principles of criminal liability. Specific issues raised include the distinction between basic and specific intent, and the rule that intoxication cannot be used as a defense for crimes of recklessness. The Law Commission has proposed some clarifications but not a full rewrite, which raises questions about how much the reforms will actually improve the defenses.
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
The document discusses two criminal defenses - insanity and intoxication - and argues that both are in need of reform. Regarding insanity, it notes that the legal definition has not changed significantly since 1842 and is considered obsolete and medically irrelevant. It also examines problems with applying the defense, including potential indefinite detention. For intoxication, it finds the distinction between basic and specific intent confusing and argues the defense is too restricted, ignoring the principles of mens rea and actus reus. The Law Commission acknowledges issues with both but its proposed reforms are seen as codifying existing law rather than fully addressing criticisms.
1.4 strict liability & causation
This document discusses strict liability offenses and causation in criminal law. It explains that strict liability offenses do not require proof of mens rea, only actus reus, lowering the prosecution's burden of proof. Strict liability typically applies only to minor offenses to reduce legal system demands. Examples given are speeding and selling to minors. The document also discusses causation, requiring a link between the accused's actions and the criminal result. It analyzes the R v Blaue case, where the accused's appeal failed because refusing medical treatment did not absolve him of responsibility for inflicting wounds that were still operating causes of death.
INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINAL LAW
Criminal law 101 provides an overview of key concepts in criminal law. It defines criminal law and discusses characteristics like being generally binding and having prospective effect. It also outlines sources of criminal law like the Revised Penal Code. Crimes are further categorized as being against persons or properties. The basic elements of a crime are also defined, including actus reus, mens rea, concurrence, and causation. Crimes can be classified as felonies, misdemeanors, malum in se, or malum prohibitum. The stages in committing a crime and theories of criminal law like the classical and positivist approaches are also summarized. Penalties and levels of participation like principals, accomplices and accessories
Involuntary Manslaughter
The document discusses the key elements of involuntary manslaughter, including gross negligence and constructive act manslaughter. It provides examples of cases and asks questions to test the reader's understanding of distinguishing between constructive acts, gross negligence, duties of care, breaches that cause death, and what constitutes grossly negligent actions. It aims to consolidate knowledge of this area of criminal law.
Ch 4 Elements and Parties
This document summarizes key concepts related to elements of crimes and parties to crimes from the 7th edition of Scheb and Scheb's Criminal Law and Procedure textbook. It outlines the basic elements of a crime as actus reus (wrongful act) and mens rea (criminal intent). It also discusses actus reus requirements, when failure to act can constitute a criminal act, status as a criminal act, possession as a criminal act, mens rea requirements including general vs specific intent and the Model Penal Code approach. Finally, it briefly covers causation, strict liability offenses, statutory rape as a strict liability crime, and parties to crimes under common law and the modern American approach.
Ch 14 Criminal Responsibility and Defenses
The document discusses criminal responsibility and defenses. It covers topics like insanity, intoxication, infancy, justification, excuse, use of force defenses like self-defense, and reforms to insanity defense laws. Key cases discussed include M'Naghten, Durham test, and Hinckley case which led to reforms placing burden of proof on defendants for insanity pleas.
1. Actus Reus.pdf
This document summarizes various aspects of actus reus, which is the physical or voluntary act required for a crime.
It discusses actus reus in the form of conduct, such as voluntary wrongdoing. It also examines situational liability, where crimes involve proof of being in a certain situation rather than conduct. Crimes of possession are also summarized, where possession of prohibited objects or substances is sufficient.
The document analyzes crimes of omission, noting they generally do not result in liability but there are exceptions if there is a legal duty to act. This duty can arise from special relationships like parent-child or contractual relationships. The duty can also arise if one assumes responsibility for another or creates a dangerous situation
Forensic psychiatry concept & implications
This document discusses the concept of forensic psychiatry and its implications. Forensic psychiatry deals with the interface between psychiatry and law. It involves determining competency to stand trial, assessing the mental state of prisoners and conducting research related to prisons. Forensic psychiatrists provide expert opinions in legal cases involving issues like criminal responsibility, competency, mental fitness and testamentary capacity. The document outlines Indian laws related to criminal liability, insanity defense, diminished responsibility, consent and civil matters like contracts, marriage, divorce and adoption from a forensic psychiatry perspective.
DRAFTING COURT LEGAL DOCUMENTS FOR ARAB LAWYERS AND LAW SCHOOL STUDENTS
This document discusses avoiding compound constructions in legal writing. It provides examples of common compound prepositions and conjunctions that can be replaced with simpler one- or two-word alternatives, such as "by" instead of "by means of" and "if" instead of "in the event that". Readers are advised to replace noun sandwiches like preposition-noun-preposition with clearer single words and identify other wordy phrases legal documents. Sample sentences are rewritten to demonstrate stripping out unnecessary compound terms.
Human Rights for Arab legal school students
This document provides a summary of the first 11 articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Article 1 establishes that all humans are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
Article 2 entitles everyone to all the rights and freedoms set forth in the Declaration, without distinction of any kind.
Article 3 establishes that everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
The subsequent articles prohibit slavery, torture, arbitrary arrest, and establish rights to an effective remedy, a fair trial, and the presumption of innocence.
The document analyzes the key principles and regulations established in each of the first 11 articles of the UDHR.
More Related Content
Similar to Actus reus الركن المادى للجريمة
Defences For The Accused
The document discusses various defences that can be used in criminal cases, including denial of the crime, justifications, mental states, mental disorders, intoxication, self-defence, necessity, compulsion/duress, provocation, and battered woman's syndrome. It provides details on the legal requirements and tests for each defence. Key points include that mental disorder can be used as a defence if the accused was unable to appreciate the nature of their actions or know they were wrong. Intoxication is generally not a defence but may be in cases of specific intent or extreme intoxication. Self-defence must use reasonable force, while defence of property allows greater force. Battered woman's syndrome provides context for why an abused
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
The document discusses the extent to which criminal law relating to omissions reflects the view that law should encourage citizens to do 'the right thing' and not fail to help those in need. Generally under common law, omissions cannot constitute offenses. However, the law has recognized limited liability for omissions where a duty to act exists, such as statutory, contractual, or familial duties. The law's recognition of duty situations encourages citizens to act when they can reasonably help those in need, reflecting the idea that law should promote moral behavior. However, some argue it is difficult to define clear duty situations and imposing broad duties could threaten individual freedom and overwhelm the legal system.
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
This document provides profiles of several notorious UK serial killers:
1. Peter Sutcliffe (The Yorkshire Ripper) murdered 13 women in the late 1970s and attacked 7 others. He claimed to hear voices telling him to kill prostitutes.
2. Fred and Rose West tortured, sexually abused, and murdered at least 12 people in Gloucester in the 1970s-80s. Fred West killed himself in prison in 1995 while awaiting trial. Rose West was convicted of 10 murders.
3. Harold Shipman is considered the most prolific serial killer in UK history, having been found responsible for the deaths of at least 215 patients via lethal injections as their family doctor over 23 years. He hanged himself
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
The document discusses several issues and defences related to criminal law, including insanity and automatism defences. It notes that the burden of proof differs depending on whether the defence or prosecution raises insanity, which may confuse juries. The definition of insanity has also been criticized as outdated and irrelevant. The effectiveness of the verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity is also questioned. Reforms to modernize rules around fitness to plead and legal insanity are needed to make the law consistent with modern psychiatric understanding.
Steven is on trial for the murder of a man named Joseph. At first .docx
Steven is on trial for the murder of a man named Joseph. At first glance, the case constitutes a crime and punishment under the law. It appears that Steven committed an unlawful act voluntarily and had the full intention of doing so. Based on this evidence alone, Steven has fulfilled the definition of committing a crime.
The criminal court system intends to provide justice to those involved in the court process. Let’s take a closer look at the events that unfolded on the night that Joseph was killed. Steven was alone inside his one-bedroom apartment in the city. It was late at night, and he was almost asleep when he heard someone break the padlock on the door and enter his apartment. The man moved directly up to Stephen’s bedroom and forced the locked door open. Joseph had broken into Steven’s home with the intent to injure and possibly kill Steven. Once he had gained entry into the room, the intruder, Joseph, first tried to strangle the unsuspecting homeowner, but when it was clear that Steven might overpower him, Joseph removed a revolver from his back pocket and shot at Steven twice. To protect himself from serious bodily harm, Steven dislodged himself from his potential killer, moved to his kitchen, and stabbed Joseph with a kitchen knife. As Steven moves through the court process, his lawyer is likely to use the fact that the act was self-defense to prove that Steven is not legally guilty for his actions and should not be found guilty of murder under the law.
Steven is on trial for the murder of a man named Joseph. At first glance, the case constitutes a crime and punishment under the law. It appears that Steven committed an unlawful act voluntarily and had the full intention of doing so. Based on this evidence alone, Steven has fulfilled the definition of committing a crime.
The criminal court system intends to provide justice to those involved in the court process. Let’s take a closer look at the events that unfolded on the night that Joseph was killed. Steven was alone inside his one-bedroom apartment in the city. It was late at night, and he was almost asleep when he heard someone break the padlock on the door and enter his apartment. The man moved directly up to Stephen’s bedroom and forced the locked door open. Joseph had broken into Steven’s home with the intent to injure and possibly kill Steven. Once he had gained entry into the room, the intruder, Joseph, first tried to strangle the unsuspecting homeowner, but when it was clear that Steven might overpower him, Joseph removed a revolver from his back pocket and shot at Steven twice. To protect himself from serious bodily harm, Steven dislodged himself from his potential killer, moved to his kitchen, and stabbed Joseph with a kitchen knife. As Steven moves through the court process, his lawyer is likely to use the fact that the act was self-defense to prove that Steven is not legally guilty for his actions and should not be found guilty of murder under the law.
For an act to be .
Introduction.pdf
The Supreme Court analyzed two cases dealing with convictions under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012. In both cases, the High Court had ignored POCSO provisions and convicted the accused of minor offenses under the Indian Penal Code. The Supreme Court held that Section 7 of POCSO does not require skin-to-skin contact and that any act done with sexual intent that involves physical contact can be considered sexual assault. The Court also discussed how Sections 29 and 30 of POCSO create mandatory presumptions around an accused's guilt and mental state that must be considered and can only be rebutted with clear evidence proving innocence beyond reasonable doubt.
BASIC LAW CONCEPTS: OFFENCES & DEFENSES
This 3-page document contains definitions and examples of offences and defenses in English Common Law and applies to Commonwealth countries like the UK, NZ and Australia. Useful for beginner Law and Forensic Psychology students.
1-131118073532-phpapp02.pdf
This document provides an overview of the key concepts of criminal liability under Malaysian law, including the definition of a crime, elements of a crime (actus reus and mens rea), and discussions of actus reus. It defines a crime and notes that every crime has its own specific definition. It explains that for criminal liability to exist, there must generally be an unlawful act (actus reus) accompanied by a blameworthy state of mind (mens rea). The document then discusses actus reus in depth, including that it can involve an act, omission, or circumstance, and must be voluntary. It provides examples of when an omission can form the basis of criminal liability and discusses the defense of automat
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Murder requires the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought. There are two types of intent that can demonstrate malice: direct intent to kill or cause serious harm, or indirect/oblique intent where death or serious injury were foreseeable consequences of the defendant's actions. The defendant's actions must also be both the factual and legal cause of death. There are several defenses that can reduce murder to manslaughter, including diminished responsibility, loss of self-control due to provocation, insanity per the M'Naghten rules, and automatism. Intoxication can prevent formation of intent, and unlawful act manslaughter involves death resulting from a dangerous criminal act. Gross negligence manslaughter involves owed duty of care,
The criminal code of canada
The document outlines various criminal offences in Canada, including their elements and classifications. It discusses violent offences like homicide, murder, manslaughter, and assault. It also covers sexual assault and identifies three levels based on severity of the crime. Motor vehicle offences in the Criminal Code like dangerous operation and hit-and-run are explained. Impaired driving laws and penalties for exceeding blood alcohol limits while operating a vehicle are also summarized.
Principles of criminal liability
Criminal liability requires proving five key principles: actus reus, mens rea, concurrence, causation, and resulting harm. Actus reus refers to a criminal act. Mens rea refers to criminal intent. Concurrence means the act and intent occurred together. Causation means the act caused the result. Each principle involves complex legal issues that prosecutors must address when bringing charges. Presumptions in criminal cases are meant to simplify trials, not substitute for evidence of a crime.
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
The document discusses two criminal defenses - insanity and intoxication - and argues that both are in need of reform. Regarding insanity, it notes that the legal definition has not changed significantly since 1842 and is considered obsolete and medically irrelevant. It also examines problems with applying the defense, including indefinite detention. For intoxication, it finds the law is based more on public policy than principles of criminal liability. Specific issues raised include the distinction between basic and specific intent, and the rule that intoxication cannot be used as a defense for crimes of recklessness. The Law Commission has proposed some clarifications but not a full rewrite, which raises questions about how much the reforms will actually improve the defenses.
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
The document discusses two criminal defenses - insanity and intoxication - and argues that both are in need of reform. Regarding insanity, it notes that the legal definition has not changed significantly since 1842 and is considered obsolete and medically irrelevant. It also examines problems with applying the defense, including potential indefinite detention. For intoxication, it finds the distinction between basic and specific intent confusing and argues the defense is too restricted, ignoring the principles of mens rea and actus reus. The Law Commission acknowledges issues with both but its proposed reforms are seen as codifying existing law rather than fully addressing criticisms.
1.4 strict liability & causation
This document discusses strict liability offenses and causation in criminal law. It explains that strict liability offenses do not require proof of mens rea, only actus reus, lowering the prosecution's burden of proof. Strict liability typically applies only to minor offenses to reduce legal system demands. Examples given are speeding and selling to minors. The document also discusses causation, requiring a link between the accused's actions and the criminal result. It analyzes the R v Blaue case, where the accused's appeal failed because refusing medical treatment did not absolve him of responsibility for inflicting wounds that were still operating causes of death.
INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINAL LAW
Criminal law 101 provides an overview of key concepts in criminal law. It defines criminal law and discusses characteristics like being generally binding and having prospective effect. It also outlines sources of criminal law like the Revised Penal Code. Crimes are further categorized as being against persons or properties. The basic elements of a crime are also defined, including actus reus, mens rea, concurrence, and causation. Crimes can be classified as felonies, misdemeanors, malum in se, or malum prohibitum. The stages in committing a crime and theories of criminal law like the classical and positivist approaches are also summarized. Penalties and levels of participation like principals, accomplices and accessories
Involuntary Manslaughter
The document discusses the key elements of involuntary manslaughter, including gross negligence and constructive act manslaughter. It provides examples of cases and asks questions to test the reader's understanding of distinguishing between constructive acts, gross negligence, duties of care, breaches that cause death, and what constitutes grossly negligent actions. It aims to consolidate knowledge of this area of criminal law.
Ch 4 Elements and Parties
This document summarizes key concepts related to elements of crimes and parties to crimes from the 7th edition of Scheb and Scheb's Criminal Law and Procedure textbook. It outlines the basic elements of a crime as actus reus (wrongful act) and mens rea (criminal intent). It also discusses actus reus requirements, when failure to act can constitute a criminal act, status as a criminal act, possession as a criminal act, mens rea requirements including general vs specific intent and the Model Penal Code approach. Finally, it briefly covers causation, strict liability offenses, statutory rape as a strict liability crime, and parties to crimes under common law and the modern American approach.
Ch 14 Criminal Responsibility and Defenses
The document discusses criminal responsibility and defenses. It covers topics like insanity, intoxication, infancy, justification, excuse, use of force defenses like self-defense, and reforms to insanity defense laws. Key cases discussed include M'Naghten, Durham test, and Hinckley case which led to reforms placing burden of proof on defendants for insanity pleas.
1. Actus Reus.pdf
This document summarizes various aspects of actus reus, which is the physical or voluntary act required for a crime.
It discusses actus reus in the form of conduct, such as voluntary wrongdoing. It also examines situational liability, where crimes involve proof of being in a certain situation rather than conduct. Crimes of possession are also summarized, where possession of prohibited objects or substances is sufficient.
The document analyzes crimes of omission, noting they generally do not result in liability but there are exceptions if there is a legal duty to act. This duty can arise from special relationships like parent-child or contractual relationships. The duty can also arise if one assumes responsibility for another or creates a dangerous situation
Forensic psychiatry concept & implications
This document discusses the concept of forensic psychiatry and its implications. Forensic psychiatry deals with the interface between psychiatry and law. It involves determining competency to stand trial, assessing the mental state of prisoners and conducting research related to prisons. Forensic psychiatrists provide expert opinions in legal cases involving issues like criminal responsibility, competency, mental fitness and testamentary capacity. The document outlines Indian laws related to criminal liability, insanity defense, diminished responsibility, consent and civil matters like contracts, marriage, divorce and adoption from a forensic psychiatry perspective.
Similar to Actus reus الركن المادى للجريمة (20)
Steven is on trial for the murder of a man named Joseph. At first .docx
Steven is on trial for the murder of a man named Joseph. At first .docx
More from ezzeldin bassyouni
DRAFTING COURT LEGAL DOCUMENTS FOR ARAB LAWYERS AND LAW SCHOOL STUDENTS
This document discusses avoiding compound constructions in legal writing. It provides examples of common compound prepositions and conjunctions that can be replaced with simpler one- or two-word alternatives, such as "by" instead of "by means of" and "if" instead of "in the event that". Readers are advised to replace noun sandwiches like preposition-noun-preposition with clearer single words and identify other wordy phrases legal documents. Sample sentences are rewritten to demonstrate stripping out unnecessary compound terms.
Human Rights for Arab legal school students
This document provides a summary of the first 11 articles of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Article 1 establishes that all humans are born free and equal in dignity and rights.
Article 2 entitles everyone to all the rights and freedoms set forth in the Declaration, without distinction of any kind.
Article 3 establishes that everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person.
The subsequent articles prohibit slavery, torture, arbitrary arrest, and establish rights to an effective remedy, a fair trial, and the presumption of innocence.
The document analyzes the key principles and regulations established in each of the first 11 articles of the UDHR.
حقوق إنجليزي لطلاب Human Rights 2.pptx
This article outlines several rights related to work including:
1) The right of all individuals to work and choose their employment
2) The right to just and favorable work conditions and protection from unemployment
3) The right to equal pay for equal work without discrimination
It also mentions rights to rest, reasonable working hours, and periodic paid holidays.
Drafting legal Court Documents & Contracts
This document provides guidance on writing in plain English for legal contexts. It emphasizes using everyday words and short sentences with the active voice. Glue words like articles and conjunctions are necessary but should not comprise too high a proportion of the total words. The document offers examples of rewriting wordy sentences to be tighter and clearer by omitting unnecessary phrases and reducing the number of glue words. The revised sentences convey the same meaning using fewer words.
Rights of the accused
The document discusses the rights of the accused under the US Constitution. It summarizes the key rights guaranteed by the 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, and 14th Amendments, including the rights to due process, a speedy trial, confrontation of witnesses, protection from unlawful search and seizure, protection from self-incrimination, and equal protection under the law. These rights place restrictions on government power and guarantee a fair legal process for criminal defendants.
Drafting contract
The document provides tips on how to draft a strong contract, including keeping it simple, spelling out all details, including conflict resolution procedures, using shall to indicate a legal requirement, avoiding unnecessary legalese, developing an outline to prevent omissions, being concise, simplifying language, using active voice and base verbs rather than nouns, ensuring all parties can participate, and including consideration, terms, confidentiality clauses, termination clauses, and ensuring it follows applicable laws. Key elements of a valid contract are also listed.
الجنحة
This document provides an overview of intentional tort law. It defines intentional torts as civil wrongs resulting from intentional acts. The 8 main intentional torts are listed as battery, assault, false imprisonment, fraud, intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, invasion of privacy, trespass, and conversion. Elements of intentional torts are also discussed, with battery provided as an example requiring intent, an act, causation, and harmful/offensive contact. Defenses to intentional torts are mentioned, such as consent, self-defense, privilege, and proving the elements of the tort are not met.
Penology
This document provides definitions and explanations of key concepts in criminology and penology. It defines penology as the study of crime punishment and prison management. Criminology is defined as the scientific study of crime and efforts by society to control crime. The document outlines the differences between criminology and penology, and describes the four types of penology. It also discusses the sciences involved in criminology and criminalistics.
Witness statement
This document provides information about witness statements, including:
- The four main types of witnesses are eyewitnesses, lay witnesses, expert witnesses, and character witnesses.
- Anyone over 18 with relevant knowledge and mental capacity can provide a witness statement.
- A witness statement is a type of written evidence that can help establish facts in an investigation.
- While a witness statement alone is not enough to convict, it can commit a witness to their version of events and help experts form opinions.
Mens rea2 الركن المعنوى للجريمة
This document discusses the legal concept of mens rea, which refers to the mental state or intent required to commit a crime. It provides definitions of mens rea and notes that most legal systems require criminal intent for most crimes. The document also discusses different types of mens rea, exceptions for strict liability crimes, and related concepts like actus reus, transferred intent, and corporate liability.
Us court system 2 المرافعة امام المحاكم الامريكية الجزء الثانى
The document discusses the US court system and civil procedure process. It describes the different types of courts and jurisdictions. The civil procedure process includes pleadings where the plaintiff files a complaint and the defendant files an answer. It then discusses the discovery process where evidence is gathered through depositions, interrogatories, requests for documents and admissions. Motions are filed requesting court orders. If not settled, the case proceeds to a trial where both sides present evidence before a jury which deliberates and issues a verdict that the judge forms into a judgment. The losing party can appeal the judgment.
Mens rea
This document discusses the concept of mens rea, which refers to the mental state or intent required for a crime. It notes that mens rea is the mental part of a crime, while the physical part is known as actus reus. There are different levels of mens rea, including general intent, specific intent, knowledge, recklessness, and criminal negligence. Strict liability crimes are also discussed, which do not require proof of mens rea. Various examples are provided to illustrate concepts like transferred intent, vicarious liability, and different levels of mens rea for the crimes of murder, manslaughter, and negligent homicide.
Discovery تحضيرات القضية امام المحاكم الامريكية
The discovery phase of a trial allows both parties to access all relevant information and evidence from the opposing party. During discovery, parties can obtain documents, reports, testimony, and other evidence through interrogatories, requests for production of documents, depositions, and other methods. If a party fails to comply with discovery requests, they may face sanctions from the court like dismissal of their case or default judgment against them. The overall goal of discovery is to avoid surprises at trial and better prepare each side.
Evidence الدليل امام المحاكم الامريكية
This document contains information about different types of evidence that can be presented in US courts. It discusses direct evidence versus circumstantial evidence, as well as different categories of evidence like real evidence, documentary evidence, testimonial evidence, and digital evidence. It provides examples of different types of physical evidence, circumstantial evidence, and discusses how evidence must meet standards like being admissible, authentic, and reliable to be presented in court.
Interrogatories الاستجواب امام المحاكم الامريكية
This document discusses interrogatories, which are written questions sent by one party to another in a civil case that must be answered under oath. Interrogatories are part of the discovery process and are used to gather preliminary information before trial. The recipient has 30 days to provide full and complete answers to each interrogatory or object to specific questions. Failure to respond can result in a motion to compel being filed. While interrogatories provide a low-cost way to obtain information, depositions allow for more spontaneous questioning and follow-up.
Pleadings and motions العريضة والطلبات امام المحاكم الامريكية
Pleadings and motions are formal written statements filed with the court that inform all parties of the claims and requests being made. There are seven types of pleadings allowed under federal rules, including complaints, answers to complaints, and replies to answers. Pleadings can be categorized as either notice pleadings, which provide allegations to give notice of the lawsuit, or fact pleadings, which provide specific facts. Motions are formal requests made to the judge, such as motions to dismiss a case or motions for temporary restraining orders.
Deeds النصرفات العقارية
A deed is a written legal document that transfers ownership of real property. The most common types of deeds are general warranty deeds, limited warranty deeds, and quitclaim deeds. A general warranty deed provides the strongest assurance of clear title, as the seller warrants that there are no defects or liens on the property and agrees to compensate the buyer if any claims arise. General warranty deeds are most commonly used due to the protections they provide buyers.
Photos strategies
This document discusses strategies for using photos in the classroom. It suggests letting students figure things out on their own and construct their own understanding from photos rather than being directly taught. The document also provides contact information for Ezzeldin Bassyouni, including an email address and phone number.
More from ezzeldin bassyouni (20)
DRAFTING COURT LEGAL DOCUMENTS FOR ARAB LAWYERS AND LAW SCHOOL STUDENTS
DRAFTING COURT LEGAL DOCUMENTS FOR ARAB LAWYERS AND LAW SCHOOL STUDENTS
Us court system 2 المرافعة امام المحاكم الامريكية الجزء الثانى
Us court system 2 المرافعة امام المحاكم الامريكية الجزء الثانى
Pleadings and motions العريضة والطلبات امام المحاكم الامريكية
Pleadings and motions العريضة والطلبات امام المحاكم الامريكية
Recently uploaded
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptx
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Incometax Compliance_PF_ ESI- June 2024
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Pim Betist's presentation about generative AI in the legal sector at Lexpo.com '24
Search Warrants for NH Law Enforcement Officers
Training aid for law enforcement officers related to search warrants, the requirements needed, drafting, and execution of the search warrant.
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
Learn more on how to obtain the work permit for self-employed persons in Italy at https://immigration-italy.com/selfemployment-work-permit-in-italy/.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional and judicial approach
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
Lincoln硕士毕业证成绩单【微信95270640】办理新西兰林肯大学毕业证原版一模一样、Lincoln毕业证制作【Q微信95270640】《新西兰林肯大学毕业证购买流程》《Lincoln成绩单制作》新西兰林肯大学毕业证书Lincoln毕业证文凭新西兰林肯大学
本科毕业证书,学历学位认证如何办理【留学国外学位学历认证、毕业证、成绩单、大学Offer、雅思托福代考、语言证书、学生卡、高仿教育部认证等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务】代办国外（海外）英国、加拿大、美国、新西兰、澳大利亚、新西兰等国外各大学毕业证、文凭学历证书、成绩单、学历学位认证真实可查。
[留学文凭学历认证(留信认证使馆认证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单毕业证证书大学Offer请假条成绩单语言证书国际回国人员证明高仿教育部认证申请学校等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务。
多年留学服务公司,拥有海外样板无数能完美1:1还原海外各国大学degreeDiplomaTranscripts等毕业材料。海外大学毕业材料都有哪些工艺呢？工艺难度主要由：烫金.钢印.底纹.水印.防伪光标.热敏防伪等等组成。而且我们每天都在更新海外文凭的样板以求所有同学都能享受到完美的品质服务。
国外毕业证学位证成绩单办理方法：
1客户提供办理新西兰林肯大学新西兰林肯大学毕业证学位证信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：我们有专业老师帮你查询）；
2开始安排制作毕业证成绩单电子图；
3毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快读邮寄）
— — — — 我们是挂科和未毕业同学们的福音我们是实体公司精益求精的工艺！ — — — -
一真实留信认证的作用(私企外企荣誉的见证):
1：该专业认证可证明留学生真实留学身份同时对留学生所学专业等级给予评定。
2：国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书这个入网证书并且可以归档到地方。
3：凡是获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内将在公安部网内查询个人身份证信息后同步读取人才网入库信息。
4：个人职称评审加20分个人信誉贷款加10分。
5：在国家人才网主办的全国网络招聘大会中纳入资料供国家500强等高端企业选择人才。问山娃想买什么想吃什么山娃知道父亲赚钱很辛苦除了书籍和文具山娃啥也不要能牵着父亲的手满城闲逛他已心满意足了父亲连挑了三套童装叫山娃试穿山娃有点不想父亲说城里不比乡下要穿得漂漂亮亮爸怎么不穿得漂亮望着父亲山娃反问道父亲听了并不回答只是吃吃地笑山娃很精神越逛越起劲父亲却越逛越疲倦望着父亲呵欠连天的样子山娃也说困了累了回家吧小屋闷罐一般头顶上的三叶扇彻夜呜呜作响搅得满屋热气腾腾也搅得山娃心烦意乱父亲一的
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...Syed Muhammad Humza Hussain
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
असंगत न्यायालयी फैसलों के कारण भारत में महिलाओं को सुरक्षित गर्भपात के लिए एक भ्रामक और अनुचित कानूनी लड़ाई का सामना करना पड़ रहा है।
Recently uploaded (20)
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem
Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
fnaf lore.pptx ...................................
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
Actus reus الركن المادى للجريمة
- 1. Actus Reus ميةرللج املادى كنرال EZZELDIN BASSYOUNI Master of law George Mason university 01225297655 أعمال ورجال محامين إنجليزى تجارة إنجليزى حقوق ezzbassyouni@gmail.com
- 2. ACTUS REUS The physical act of a crime
- 3. Two essential elements of a crime Mens rea Actus reus
- 4. What kind of act ? Act must be voluntary defendant must choose to act ,must have a guilty mind, involuntary act ,sleep walk ,Hypnosis and convulsions will not support actus reus .An act must be in physical movement and voluntary.
- 5. Ex: king vs Cogdon - Australian case 1950 –during the Korean war defendant (mother ) killed her daughter while sleeping walk, the jury acquitted ,the woman thought her daughter attacked by Korean ,the jury agreed ,under those circumstances the defendant act involuntary.
- 6. What is an example of actus reus? ACTUS REUS The external behaviour or conduct which is prohibited by the criminal law. Actus reus means more than just 'guilty acts'. ... For example, the actus reus of theft is taking someone else's property, and the actus reus of murder is unlawfully killing another person.
- 7. Why is actus reus important? Actus reus ("culpable action" in Latin) is required to determine whether a crime has been committed. Actus reus must be present for a criminal conviction-
- 8. Note all states do not adopt penal code in some states penal code a person commits an offense only if he – voluntarily engages in conduct including an act ,an omission or possession .
- 9. The following are not support actus reus thoughts : you are free in your own thoughts but criminal acts based on your thoughts would be indicted persecuted. status status would not supported actus reus Robinson v California case 1962,status of drug addict ,can not be basis of criminal persecution ,US supreme court stated that it is status crime you cant be convicted of drug addict .
- 10. Concepts Omission ,crimes by omission failure to act crimes by omission require a duty to act note : general rule people owe no duty to rescue others unless this duty establish by law
- 11. Duty to act can arise from Statute : it is your duty by law to report child upuse or leaving the scene of action although you have a duty to stop when you get involved in an accident and your failure to stop would be omission and would be persecuted for that.
- 12. Duty from relationship parent –child duty to care –shelter –food- duty from contract ex physician contracted with a patient for special treatment and care life guard contracted to rescues people at the sea shore
- 13. Possession concept require knowing possession ,defendant knowingly obtained or received the thing ,aware of control over a thing had a sufficient time to terminate control or get rid of that thing.
- 14. Causation note some acts are criminal even thought the intended result does not occur ex ,lying to the jury but the jury does not believe the lie , some crime require a particular result Ex, death in homicide cases, the act must be the cause of the result factual case: But for the act ,result would not occur but note not all factual case a proximate legal cause there may be intervening cause someone else intervene in the picture that interrupted the act and lead to different type of result so we look for the similarity between intended result and your actual result