External accountant, specially the Big 4s, and their performance and liability around the long list of financial scandals and corporate fraud the last decade.
ERISA Retirement Service Providers November 2012fredreish
This newsletter provides information for service providers to ERISA-governed retirement plans. It focuses on recent legal issues impacting these service providers. Now that service providers have disclosed their services, status, and compensation to plan sponsors, as required under 408(b)(2), plan sponsors must review and evaluate these disclosures. However, many sponsors lack the expertise to properly do this. As a result, service providers will need to help their sponsor clients with this process. Additionally, the Department of Labor recently issued guidance on disclosure requirements for investments made through brokerage windows but then retreated from this position due to criticism. While the guidance was revised, the issue is not fully resolved and plans/providers should consider why the DOL pursued
The VA OIG conducted an audit to determine if the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) properly oversaw its foreclosed property management contractor. The audit found that VBA approved expense reimbursements totaling $64,400 that lacked adequate supporting documentation, such as vendor invoices. Additionally, VBA did not ensure that safety hazards and property maintenance issues identified by VBA staff were reported to the contractor and corrected in a timely manner. The audit recommended that VBA require the contractor to provide documentation to support expenses and develop policies to ensure maintenance issues are addressed promptly. While VBA concurred with most recommendations, it disagreed that some reimbursements were improper payments due to insufficient documentation.
For more information contact: emailus@marcusevans.com
Towers Watson a speaker at the marcus evans Canadian Institutional Investment Summit Fall 2011 in Quebec, delivers his presentation on Capitalizing on Infrastructure Projects in Canada – How Do Mid-Market Institutional Investors Gain Exposure to This Asset Class?
Join the 2014 Summit along with leading regional investors and global asset managers in an intimate environment for a focused discussion of key new drivers shaping wealth management strategies today.
For more information contact: emailus@marcusevans.com
David Walker, Group Vice President - Global Borrowings, GMAC LLC Bank of Amer...finance8
The document discusses GMAC's performance in Q3 2007. It reports a loss of $1.6 billion, driven by disappointing results at ResCap due to the unprecedented disruption in global capital markets and mortgage sector. Auto finance and insurance segments remained strong. ResCap is restructuring its mortgage operations in response to fundamental changes in the mortgage market. GMAC and ResCap maintained strong liquidity and capital positions in Q3.
This document summarizes a study that compares personnel selection practices across 10 countries. The study finds:
1) There is more divergence than convergence currently in recruitment practices across countries, as selection criteria are still driven by each country's cultural values.
2) However, organizations worldwide seem to be converging on recruitment methods, though current selection standards differ by country.
3) The study examined prevalence and desirability of selection criteria in different countries using a standardized survey, finding differences in actual practices versus universally preferred practices.
Board member of Goldman Sachs and Procter & Gamble charged in insider tradingAndres Baytelman
Rajat K. Gupta, a business consultant who served on the boards of Goldman Sachs and Procter & Gamble, was charged with insider trading for tipping hedge fund manager Raj Rajaratnam with confidential, non-public information about both companies' earnings and a $5 billion investment in Goldman Sachs. The SEC alleges that Gupta shared details from private board meetings with Rajaratnam, who then traded on the information and generated over $18 million in profits. Gupta is accused of violating securities laws and faces civil charges including financial penalties and a potential ban from serving as a corporate officer or director.
Over 1 billion children live in poverty, with 25,000 children dying each day due to poverty. Additionally, 72 million children in the developing world were not in school in 2005 and nearly 1 billion people entered the 21st century unable to read or write their names. Global education aims to promote international understanding and cooperation that could lead to social and cultural progress, though some critics argue it is part of a conspiracy for a new world order.
J.P. morgan to pay us$153.6 million to settle sec charges of misleading investAndres Baytelman
The SEC charged J.P. Morgan Securities with misleading investors about a CDO tied to the U.S. housing market. J.P. Morgan agreed to pay $153.6 million to settle the charges. The SEC alleged that J.P. Morgan did not disclose that a hedge fund that helped select assets for the CDO portfolio and had a short position in over half of the assets. Nearly all investors lost their entire investments. As part of the settlement, harmed investors will receive full repayment of their losses.
ERISA Retirement Service Providers November 2012fredreish
This newsletter provides information for service providers to ERISA-governed retirement plans. It focuses on recent legal issues impacting these service providers. Now that service providers have disclosed their services, status, and compensation to plan sponsors, as required under 408(b)(2), plan sponsors must review and evaluate these disclosures. However, many sponsors lack the expertise to properly do this. As a result, service providers will need to help their sponsor clients with this process. Additionally, the Department of Labor recently issued guidance on disclosure requirements for investments made through brokerage windows but then retreated from this position due to criticism. While the guidance was revised, the issue is not fully resolved and plans/providers should consider why the DOL pursued
The VA OIG conducted an audit to determine if the Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) properly oversaw its foreclosed property management contractor. The audit found that VBA approved expense reimbursements totaling $64,400 that lacked adequate supporting documentation, such as vendor invoices. Additionally, VBA did not ensure that safety hazards and property maintenance issues identified by VBA staff were reported to the contractor and corrected in a timely manner. The audit recommended that VBA require the contractor to provide documentation to support expenses and develop policies to ensure maintenance issues are addressed promptly. While VBA concurred with most recommendations, it disagreed that some reimbursements were improper payments due to insufficient documentation.
For more information contact: emailus@marcusevans.com
Towers Watson a speaker at the marcus evans Canadian Institutional Investment Summit Fall 2011 in Quebec, delivers his presentation on Capitalizing on Infrastructure Projects in Canada – How Do Mid-Market Institutional Investors Gain Exposure to This Asset Class?
Join the 2014 Summit along with leading regional investors and global asset managers in an intimate environment for a focused discussion of key new drivers shaping wealth management strategies today.
For more information contact: emailus@marcusevans.com
David Walker, Group Vice President - Global Borrowings, GMAC LLC Bank of Amer...finance8
The document discusses GMAC's performance in Q3 2007. It reports a loss of $1.6 billion, driven by disappointing results at ResCap due to the unprecedented disruption in global capital markets and mortgage sector. Auto finance and insurance segments remained strong. ResCap is restructuring its mortgage operations in response to fundamental changes in the mortgage market. GMAC and ResCap maintained strong liquidity and capital positions in Q3.
This document summarizes a study that compares personnel selection practices across 10 countries. The study finds:
1) There is more divergence than convergence currently in recruitment practices across countries, as selection criteria are still driven by each country's cultural values.
2) However, organizations worldwide seem to be converging on recruitment methods, though current selection standards differ by country.
3) The study examined prevalence and desirability of selection criteria in different countries using a standardized survey, finding differences in actual practices versus universally preferred practices.
Board member of Goldman Sachs and Procter & Gamble charged in insider tradingAndres Baytelman
Rajat K. Gupta, a business consultant who served on the boards of Goldman Sachs and Procter & Gamble, was charged with insider trading for tipping hedge fund manager Raj Rajaratnam with confidential, non-public information about both companies' earnings and a $5 billion investment in Goldman Sachs. The SEC alleges that Gupta shared details from private board meetings with Rajaratnam, who then traded on the information and generated over $18 million in profits. Gupta is accused of violating securities laws and faces civil charges including financial penalties and a potential ban from serving as a corporate officer or director.
Over 1 billion children live in poverty, with 25,000 children dying each day due to poverty. Additionally, 72 million children in the developing world were not in school in 2005 and nearly 1 billion people entered the 21st century unable to read or write their names. Global education aims to promote international understanding and cooperation that could lead to social and cultural progress, though some critics argue it is part of a conspiracy for a new world order.
J.P. morgan to pay us$153.6 million to settle sec charges of misleading investAndres Baytelman
The SEC charged J.P. Morgan Securities with misleading investors about a CDO tied to the U.S. housing market. J.P. Morgan agreed to pay $153.6 million to settle the charges. The SEC alleged that J.P. Morgan did not disclose that a hedge fund that helped select assets for the CDO portfolio and had a short position in over half of the assets. Nearly all investors lost their entire investments. As part of the settlement, harmed investors will receive full repayment of their losses.
Lack of Reasonable Privacy Expectation in Corporate EmailAndres Baytelman
The court ruled that an employee did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy over communications sent through their employer's email system. The court applied a 4-part test to determine if the employee's expectation of privacy was reasonable, considering the employer had an email policy that banned personal use and allowed access to emails for business reasons. As the employer met all parts of the test, the court ordered the production of emails between the employee and his wife. The case serves as a reminder for companies to have clear and publicized email policies regarding privacy and monitoring.
This document summarizes a study that compares personnel selection practices across ten countries. The study finds both convergence and divergence in selection practices internationally. While current selection criteria are still driven by cultural values in each country, organizations seem to be converging on common recruitment methods. The study used a standardized survey called the Best International Human Resource Management Practices Survey to examine the prevalence of different selection criteria in different nations. The survey assessed both technical skills like work experience and ability, and social skills like interpersonal skills. The findings provide insight into the balance between globalization and localization of human resource management practices internationally.
The Supreme Court considered whether a police department violated the Fourth Amendment by obtaining transcripts of text messages sent on a pager provided to an employee. The Court determined that the search was reasonable given that the employer had informed employees that their communications would not be private and were subject to auditing. While employees generally have an expectation of privacy, the Court concluded the search was motivated by a legitimate work-related purpose rather than an intent to harass the employee. The Court resolved the case based on established principles for when a search is reasonable without addressing broader privacy issues.
SEC charges Corporate Attorney and Wall Street trader in US$32 million inside...Andres Baytelman
The SEC charged a corporate attorney and Wall Street trader with insider trading involving confidential information from at least 11 mergers and acquisitions. The attorney accessed information from his law firm involving clients and tipped off a middleman, who passed the information to the trader. Through an illegal scheme using disposable phones and cash withdrawals, they obtained nearly $32 million in illicit profits. In a parallel criminal case, both individuals were arrested by the U.S. Attorney's Office for insider trading violations.
Temptation to defraud and internal auditor (albert holzinger 2010)Andres Baytelman
The document discusses elevated levels of fraud worldwide and the need for internal auditors to be cautious. It notes statistics showing fraud claims have more than doubled in recent years. The "fraud triangle" of pressure, opportunity, and rationalization helps explain why fraud risk is higher now as the global economy struggles. Internal auditors must understand fraud risks in their own organizations and ensure proper controls and monitoring are in place to prevent, detect, and investigate fraudulent activities.
1) Companies use RFID tags in workplace access cards to do more than just open doors, such as enforcing work rules and monitoring former employees, but they generally do not have explicit policies about how card data is collected and used.
2) Access card records are used to investigate individuals but also in aggregate forms like improving building plans, though employees are not informed of these uses.
3) Only one company had written policies about RFID card use, which were only given to security and not employees more broadly, and none had limited data retention policies.
The Supreme Court considered whether a police department violated an officer's Fourth Amendment rights by obtaining and reviewing transcripts of text messages sent on a pager provided by the department. The Court assumed for the sake of argument that the officer had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the messages. The Court held that the search was reasonable because it was motivated by the legitimate work-related purpose of determining whether the department's messaging allowance was sufficient, and it was not excessive in scope. The review of transcripts was a reasonable means to achieve this purpose. Therefore, the officer's Fourth Amendment rights were not violated. The Court reversed the Ninth Circuit's ruling.
Arya Vasudevan is seeking a position in sustainable architecture that provides experience in design, structure, and construction. She has skills in AutoCAD, hand drafting, presentations, model making, Revit, SketchUp, and Photoshop. She has a Bachelor's degree in Architecture and internship experience. Her permanent address is in Bangalore.
This document discusses on-bill repayment (OBR) programs for energy efficiency loans in California. It argues that OBR could increase energy efficiency project uptake by providing more convenient, low-cost financing. However, it notes that the term "OBR" was used to describe different concepts. It then analyzes how OBR programs with and without disconnection policies could impact loan volume, affordability, and ability to attract capital. While OBR may increase volume, it likely would not significantly impact affordability or capital attraction without a disconnection policy.
This chapter discusses the auditor's legal liability. It covers how the legal environment has changed with respect to auditor liability in recent years. It also discusses several landmark legal cases that have shaped expectations of an auditor's duty of care and established that auditors can be found negligent if they fail to meet standards of reasonable care and skill. The chapter addresses an auditor's liabilities to shareholders, clients, and third parties and the issues of privity of contract, causal relationships, and contributory negligence.
Surety Industry Overview: State of the Industry by Cissie ScogginDon Grauel
Cissie Scoggin of Liberty Mutual Insurance presented "Surety Industry Overview: State of the Industry" to the 68th Annual F. Addison Fowler Fall Seminar on October 17, 2014.
The document discusses directors and officers (D&O) liability insurance and the risk profile of financial institutions. It outlines factors underwriters evaluate like regulatory exposures, mergers and acquisitions, loan quality, and securities litigation trends by industry. The document also reviews top D&O insurance enhancements and coverage considerations for financial institutions based on their specific risk characteristics and needs.
The Relationship Between Insurance Companies and Outside Counsel Rachel Hamilton
Now, more than ever, attorneys and law firms must take action to ensure that they are protected from former disgruntled clients and third parties looking to recoup losses and/or share blame by bringing malpractice claims against attorneys.
This document provides an overview of captives, which are insurance companies owned by their insureds. It discusses what captives are, the reasons for forming them, and how they can save costs compared to traditional insurance. Some key advantages of captives include reduced operating costs, investment income, broader coverage, pricing stability, and improved risk management. The document also outlines different types of captives and how they can partner with fronting companies and reinsurers. It covers important considerations for captive formation such as domicile selection, regulatory requirements, documentation needs, management services, and potential disadvantages.
The document summarizes recommendations from a report by the American Bankruptcy Institute (ABI) commission on reforms to U.S. bankruptcy law. The ABI commission studied issues that were not contemplated in the 1978 Bankruptcy Code and proposed several changes. These include: slightly slowing the increasing speed of bankruptcy sales, restricting the use of "milestones" that require a sale within 60 days; trimming back the protections of "safe harbors" for securities transactions; and giving more protections to unions and trademark license holders in business sales.
This document discusses Mark Heath's assignment on corporate finance. It analyzes Modigliani and Miller's theories on capital structure and firm valuation. Specifically:
1) It applies their proposition I that firm value is unaffected by capital structure in a world without taxes to calculate the value of an unlevered and levered firm.
2) It discusses their proposition II that the weighted average cost of capital is also unaffected by capital structure when there are no taxes or transaction costs.
3) It examines how the introduction of corporate and personal taxes impacts firm valuation and the relationship between debt ratios and weighted average cost of capital. Bankruptcy costs are also considered in determining an optimal capital structure.
The document summarizes key information from Chapter 1 and 2 of an accounting textbook. It includes sample problems and discussions on: [1] interest rates for loans requiring different levels of assurance; [2] costs associated with different loan options for a company; [3] benefits of an audit; [4] evaluating evidence in an audit; and [5] establishing criteria and scope for an operational audit. It also discusses arguments for and against the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and considerations for audits being filed with the SEC.
The document provides details on Pepco Holdings' 2003 performance and future plans. It discusses challenges faced in 2003 including an energy trading loss, Mirant's bankruptcy, and Hurricane Isabel. However, actions taken in 2003 such as divesting non-core businesses and reducing risk are expected to set the stage for future earnings growth. The company remains focused on strengthening its core power delivery business and improving customer satisfaction.
The document provides details on Pepco Holdings' 2003 performance and future plans. It discusses challenges faced in 2003 including an energy trading loss, Mirant's bankruptcy, and Hurricane Isabel. However, actions taken in 2003 such as divesting non-core businesses and reducing risk are expected to set the stage for future earnings growth. The company remains focused on strengthening its core power delivery business and improving customer satisfaction.
Lack of Reasonable Privacy Expectation in Corporate EmailAndres Baytelman
The court ruled that an employee did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy over communications sent through their employer's email system. The court applied a 4-part test to determine if the employee's expectation of privacy was reasonable, considering the employer had an email policy that banned personal use and allowed access to emails for business reasons. As the employer met all parts of the test, the court ordered the production of emails between the employee and his wife. The case serves as a reminder for companies to have clear and publicized email policies regarding privacy and monitoring.
This document summarizes a study that compares personnel selection practices across ten countries. The study finds both convergence and divergence in selection practices internationally. While current selection criteria are still driven by cultural values in each country, organizations seem to be converging on common recruitment methods. The study used a standardized survey called the Best International Human Resource Management Practices Survey to examine the prevalence of different selection criteria in different nations. The survey assessed both technical skills like work experience and ability, and social skills like interpersonal skills. The findings provide insight into the balance between globalization and localization of human resource management practices internationally.
The Supreme Court considered whether a police department violated the Fourth Amendment by obtaining transcripts of text messages sent on a pager provided to an employee. The Court determined that the search was reasonable given that the employer had informed employees that their communications would not be private and were subject to auditing. While employees generally have an expectation of privacy, the Court concluded the search was motivated by a legitimate work-related purpose rather than an intent to harass the employee. The Court resolved the case based on established principles for when a search is reasonable without addressing broader privacy issues.
SEC charges Corporate Attorney and Wall Street trader in US$32 million inside...Andres Baytelman
The SEC charged a corporate attorney and Wall Street trader with insider trading involving confidential information from at least 11 mergers and acquisitions. The attorney accessed information from his law firm involving clients and tipped off a middleman, who passed the information to the trader. Through an illegal scheme using disposable phones and cash withdrawals, they obtained nearly $32 million in illicit profits. In a parallel criminal case, both individuals were arrested by the U.S. Attorney's Office for insider trading violations.
Temptation to defraud and internal auditor (albert holzinger 2010)Andres Baytelman
The document discusses elevated levels of fraud worldwide and the need for internal auditors to be cautious. It notes statistics showing fraud claims have more than doubled in recent years. The "fraud triangle" of pressure, opportunity, and rationalization helps explain why fraud risk is higher now as the global economy struggles. Internal auditors must understand fraud risks in their own organizations and ensure proper controls and monitoring are in place to prevent, detect, and investigate fraudulent activities.
1) Companies use RFID tags in workplace access cards to do more than just open doors, such as enforcing work rules and monitoring former employees, but they generally do not have explicit policies about how card data is collected and used.
2) Access card records are used to investigate individuals but also in aggregate forms like improving building plans, though employees are not informed of these uses.
3) Only one company had written policies about RFID card use, which were only given to security and not employees more broadly, and none had limited data retention policies.
The Supreme Court considered whether a police department violated an officer's Fourth Amendment rights by obtaining and reviewing transcripts of text messages sent on a pager provided by the department. The Court assumed for the sake of argument that the officer had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the messages. The Court held that the search was reasonable because it was motivated by the legitimate work-related purpose of determining whether the department's messaging allowance was sufficient, and it was not excessive in scope. The review of transcripts was a reasonable means to achieve this purpose. Therefore, the officer's Fourth Amendment rights were not violated. The Court reversed the Ninth Circuit's ruling.
Arya Vasudevan is seeking a position in sustainable architecture that provides experience in design, structure, and construction. She has skills in AutoCAD, hand drafting, presentations, model making, Revit, SketchUp, and Photoshop. She has a Bachelor's degree in Architecture and internship experience. Her permanent address is in Bangalore.
This document discusses on-bill repayment (OBR) programs for energy efficiency loans in California. It argues that OBR could increase energy efficiency project uptake by providing more convenient, low-cost financing. However, it notes that the term "OBR" was used to describe different concepts. It then analyzes how OBR programs with and without disconnection policies could impact loan volume, affordability, and ability to attract capital. While OBR may increase volume, it likely would not significantly impact affordability or capital attraction without a disconnection policy.
This chapter discusses the auditor's legal liability. It covers how the legal environment has changed with respect to auditor liability in recent years. It also discusses several landmark legal cases that have shaped expectations of an auditor's duty of care and established that auditors can be found negligent if they fail to meet standards of reasonable care and skill. The chapter addresses an auditor's liabilities to shareholders, clients, and third parties and the issues of privity of contract, causal relationships, and contributory negligence.
Surety Industry Overview: State of the Industry by Cissie ScogginDon Grauel
Cissie Scoggin of Liberty Mutual Insurance presented "Surety Industry Overview: State of the Industry" to the 68th Annual F. Addison Fowler Fall Seminar on October 17, 2014.
The document discusses directors and officers (D&O) liability insurance and the risk profile of financial institutions. It outlines factors underwriters evaluate like regulatory exposures, mergers and acquisitions, loan quality, and securities litigation trends by industry. The document also reviews top D&O insurance enhancements and coverage considerations for financial institutions based on their specific risk characteristics and needs.
The Relationship Between Insurance Companies and Outside Counsel Rachel Hamilton
Now, more than ever, attorneys and law firms must take action to ensure that they are protected from former disgruntled clients and third parties looking to recoup losses and/or share blame by bringing malpractice claims against attorneys.
This document provides an overview of captives, which are insurance companies owned by their insureds. It discusses what captives are, the reasons for forming them, and how they can save costs compared to traditional insurance. Some key advantages of captives include reduced operating costs, investment income, broader coverage, pricing stability, and improved risk management. The document also outlines different types of captives and how they can partner with fronting companies and reinsurers. It covers important considerations for captive formation such as domicile selection, regulatory requirements, documentation needs, management services, and potential disadvantages.
The document summarizes recommendations from a report by the American Bankruptcy Institute (ABI) commission on reforms to U.S. bankruptcy law. The ABI commission studied issues that were not contemplated in the 1978 Bankruptcy Code and proposed several changes. These include: slightly slowing the increasing speed of bankruptcy sales, restricting the use of "milestones" that require a sale within 60 days; trimming back the protections of "safe harbors" for securities transactions; and giving more protections to unions and trademark license holders in business sales.
This document discusses Mark Heath's assignment on corporate finance. It analyzes Modigliani and Miller's theories on capital structure and firm valuation. Specifically:
1) It applies their proposition I that firm value is unaffected by capital structure in a world without taxes to calculate the value of an unlevered and levered firm.
2) It discusses their proposition II that the weighted average cost of capital is also unaffected by capital structure when there are no taxes or transaction costs.
3) It examines how the introduction of corporate and personal taxes impacts firm valuation and the relationship between debt ratios and weighted average cost of capital. Bankruptcy costs are also considered in determining an optimal capital structure.
The document summarizes key information from Chapter 1 and 2 of an accounting textbook. It includes sample problems and discussions on: [1] interest rates for loans requiring different levels of assurance; [2] costs associated with different loan options for a company; [3] benefits of an audit; [4] evaluating evidence in an audit; and [5] establishing criteria and scope for an operational audit. It also discusses arguments for and against the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and considerations for audits being filed with the SEC.
The document provides details on Pepco Holdings' 2003 performance and future plans. It discusses challenges faced in 2003 including an energy trading loss, Mirant's bankruptcy, and Hurricane Isabel. However, actions taken in 2003 such as divesting non-core businesses and reducing risk are expected to set the stage for future earnings growth. The company remains focused on strengthening its core power delivery business and improving customer satisfaction.
The document provides details on Pepco Holdings' 2003 performance and future plans. It discusses challenges faced in 2003 including an energy trading loss, Mirant's bankruptcy, and Hurricane Isabel. However, actions taken in 2003 such as divesting non-core businesses and reducing risk are expected to set the stage for future earnings growth. The company remains focused on strengthening its core power delivery business and improving customer satisfaction.
Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) is often used for company valuation and for setting hurdle rates for project planning. With the recent increase in issuance of hybrid securities it is important to have a robust methodology for including hybrid capital in WACC.
Many analysts use a method based on rating agency equity credit. Unfortunately this can lead to misleading results.
In this paper we describe the correct methodology for computing WACC with hybrids, as well as a shortcut method that can be used if the hybrid is used only to repurchase debt or equity or both (rather than being used to fund company projects or acquisitions).
For situations in which the hybrid is being used to repurchase debt or equity or both, we recommend the shortcut method. Otherwise, we recommend the full WACC and Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) approach.
We also note that hybrids reduce the cost of capital in many situations. However, since they typically form only a moderate proportion of a firm's capital structure, expectations of reduction in WACC from hybrid issuance must be kept realistic.
Mercer Capital's Portfolio Valuation: Private Equity and Venture Capital Mark...Mercer Capital
The document discusses fraudulent conveyance and solvency opinions. It provides:
1) An overview of fraudulent conveyance laws and how solvency opinions are used to evaluate transactions that could potentially leave a company with inadequate capital or unable to pay its debts.
2) A summary of the four tests used in solvency opinions - whether a transaction leaves a company balance sheet solvent, cash flow sufficient to pay debts, with adequate capital, and with surplus assets over liabilities and capital.
3) An example of how Mercer Capital provides solvency opinions to evaluate potential fraudulent conveyance issues for transactions like leveraged buyouts and dividend recapitalizations.
QM - Dodd Frank Act - MBA Presentation 2/28/2012 to FDICGo2Training
The memorandum summarizes a meeting between FDIC management and staff and representatives from the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA). The MBA representatives expressed concerns to the FDIC about the proposed definition of a Qualified Mortgage (QM) in the Ability to Repay rule under the Dodd-Frank Act. Specifically, the MBA is concerned that the proposed definition and requirements could unduly tighten credit availability and increase costs. The QM definition is important because it provides protections from legal liability for loans that meet the QM standards.
The document discusses the state of the professional indemnity insurance market for solicitors in the UK. It notes that many insurers have exited the market or reduced their scope due to high claims costs. The assigned risks pool (ARP), which solicitors enter if they cannot obtain regular insurance, is seen as a disincentive for new insurers. The document examines the key factors driving the hard market conditions, including high claims from residential conveyancing and an increase in fraud claims. It outlines reforms proposed by the Solicitors Regulation Authority to address these issues over the coming years, including gradually phasing out the ARP and improving conveyancing standards.
This document summarizes a New York investor meeting held by Xcel Energy on November 29, 2005. The presentation outlines Xcel's strategy of investing in regulated utility assets to earn its allowed rate of return and achieve earnings growth targets. It highlights Xcel's financial performance objectives and discusses its investments in infrastructure, environmental stewardship, and supportive regulatory treatment across its utility territories. The presentation also reviews Xcel's operational focus and organizational structure.
This document summarizes a New York investor meeting held by Xcel Energy on November 29, 2005. The presentation outlines Xcel's strategy of investing in regulated utility assets to earn the allowed rate of return and deliver earnings per share growth of 5-7% annually. It highlights Xcel's environmental stewardship through renewable energy initiatives and discusses regulatory support for major projects. The organizational structure and roles of key executives are also summarized.
This document summarizes a New York investor meeting held by Xcel Energy on November 29, 2005. The presentation outlines Xcel's strategy of investing in regulated utility assets to earn its allowed rate of return and achieve earnings growth targets. It highlights Xcel's financial performance objectives and discusses its investments in transmission, distribution and customer service. The presentation also provides details on Xcel's construction program, environmental stewardship initiatives, and supportive regulatory treatment across its utility territories.
This why we are the best! We bring another $2 Mil in coverage to the table. By using Ab Transport we make sure your company and your freight are covered!
Similar to Accountant Liability. The D & O diary (20)
Este documento discute dos puntos sobre el fraude corporativo. Primero, que los modelos de prevención son efectivos pero no pueden eliminar el fraude completamente. Segundo, que el sistema legal chileno rara vez impone consecuencias significativas para los defraudadores, ya que las penas son bajas y hay muchas atenuantes disponibles. Esto reduce la efectividad de los modelos de prevención.
Fraude corporativo y correo electrónico de los trabajadoresAndres Baytelman
Este documento discute la privacidad del correo electrónico y computador corporativo en el contexto de prevenir el fraude corporativo. Argumenta que considerar el correo electrónico y computador corporativo como privados pierde sentido cuando la esencia del fraude es su ocultamiento. También analiza la jurisprudencia estadounidense, la cual sostiene que la información en sistemas corporativos es propiedad de la empresa, pero que los empleados pueden alegar privacidad si la empresa no monitorea el uso o tiene acceso legítimo.
Cohecho y lavado. columna df abr. andrés baytelmanAndres Baytelman
Este documento describe cómo el soborno y lavado de dinero pueden ocurrir en una empresa sin el conocimiento de la dirección a través de ejemplos. Explica cómo un director de obras podría recurrir al soborno de un funcionario municipal a través de un proveedor para obtener un permiso, y cómo un gerente podría lavar ese dinero a través de una "venta" de un departamento. Aunque los directivos de la empresa no estén involucrados, la ley los haría responsables penalmente. El documento concluye que estos delitos a menudo ocurren a nivel
Argentina es un país soberano ubicado en América del Sur. Limita con Chile, Bolivia, Paraguay, Brasil y Uruguay. Es el octavo país más grande del mundo y el segundo más grande de América Latina.
Este documento resume una entrevista con Andrés Baytelman, experto en fraude corporativo, sobre el caso de fraude en La Polar. Baytelman indica que este caso no es aislado y es parte de un problema más grande de fraude corporativo a nivel global. Además, señala que tanto las autoridades políticas como los líderes empresariales sabían que un caso como este ocurriría en Chile y que actualmente hay otros fraudes corporativos ocurriendo. Finalmente, critica la Ley de Responsabilidad Penal de las Personas Jurídicas de Chile, indicando
Fraude Corporativo: quiénes lo cometen, por qué, y por qué importaAndres Baytelman
La inmensa mayoría de los trabajadores que defraudan a su propia empresa son gente originalmente honesta y de confianza. Entender en profundidad las condiciones y motivos que los llevan a cometer el fraude es crucial para cualquier intento genuinamente profesional por establecer modelos de prevención y mecanismos de control serios, eficaces y costo-efectivos.
Este documento presenta las buenas noticias sobre cómo las empresas ahora tienen herramientas evaluadas y eficaces para reducir significativamente el fraude corporativo. Explica que el fraude corporativo generalmente ocurre cuando se presentan factores de oportunidad y presión, conocidos como el "triángulo del fraude". Las empresas pueden intervenir en esta estructura de oportunidad utilizando métodos como la prevención situacional que han demostrado reducir los costos del fraude corporativo en hasta un 46%.
Fraude Corporativo: quién se preocupa de las pymesAndres Baytelman
Las Pymes son por mucho el sector económico más vulnerable al fraude corporativo y sus consecuencias; y las más desprotegidas. Inaceptable, considerando que generan cerca del 80% de la fuerza laboral del país.
Fraude corporativo y hotline (diario financiero ene 13)Andres Baytelman
Columna de opinión de Andrés Baytelman en Diario Financiero de Chile, explicando por qué la línea de denuncias es reiteradamente señalada como uno de los "must# en materia de controles anti-fraude. Además, propone un modelo estratégico e inteligente, en lugar del tan común paradigma de hotline-correo.
El documento habla sobre la sobrefacturación como un esquema de fraude corporativo. La sobrefacturación implica que un empleado de la empresa se colude con un proveedor para que la empresa pague facturas infladas, repartiendo el exceso entre los involucrados. La sobrefacturación también se usa para ocultar otros tipos de fraude como ventas no declaradas o pagos a empresas falsas.
Nota en Economía y Negocios de El Mercurio sobre integración como Director a PwC Chile en área de responsabilidad penal de la empresa, compliance y fraude corporativo.
Profesionalizar el fraude corporativo: CFEs vs. Auditores y Abogados. Andres Baytelman
Columna de opinión en Diario Financiero: compliance penal, responsabilidad penal de la empresa y fraude corporativo hoy constituyen una nueva profesión, y existen a su respecto certificaciones y estándares que no se pueden obviar. Quizás el más importante, la certificación otorgada por la Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE), en virtud de la cual un profesional se presenta como CFE (Certified Fraud Examiner). Auditores y abogados no son por naturaleza expertos en la prevención del fraude corporativo, y están lejos de poseer dicha experticia en virtud meramente de sus respectivas profesiones, sin más.
Índice en Español de la versión internacional del Manual de certificación de la ACFE, hoy en día el referente profesional por excelencia en materia de compliance y fraude a nivel mundial.
Embajadas en washington con problemas para ser aceptados como clientesAndres Baytelman
Este artículo discute cómo los grandes bancos en Estados Unidos han cerrado cuentas de embajadas debido a preocupaciones sobre el cumplimiento de las regulaciones contra el lavado de dinero. Algunas embajadas han trasladado sus cuentas a bancos más pequeños, pero estos también enfrentan presiones de los reguladores. Varias embajadas ahora buscan servicios bancarios en un banco más pequeño en Nueva York, aunque transportar fondos entre ciudades plantea nuevos desafíos.
La Ley de Prácticas Corruptas en el Extranjero (FCPA) promulgada en 1977 buscaba sancionar el soborno de funcionarios extranjeros por parte de empresas y ciudadanos estadounidenses. Recientemente, su alcance se ha extendido extraterritorialmente y ha llevado a investigaciones y multas millonarias contra empresas no estadounidenses. De manera similar, la Ley Británica contra el Soborno de 2010 se aplica a cualquier empresa que haga negocios en el Reino Unido independientemente de su ubicación, lo que aument
México: Aprueban Responsabilidad Penal de Empresas Andres Baytelman
Los diputados aprobaron sancionar a las empresas que cometan delitos como lavado de dinero, delitos contra la salud, trata de personas y sobornos, con multas de hasta 12 millones de pesos, decomiso de bienes y posible disolución de la empresa.
IMPACT Silver is a pure silver zinc producer with over $260 million in revenue since 2008 and a large 100% owned 210km Mexico land package - 2024 catalysts includes new 14% grade zinc Plomosas mine and 20,000m of fully funded exploration drilling.
The Evolution and Impact of OTT Platforms: A Deep Dive into the Future of Ent...ABHILASH DUTTA
This presentation provides a thorough examination of Over-the-Top (OTT) platforms, focusing on their development and substantial influence on the entertainment industry, with a particular emphasis on the Indian market.We begin with an introduction to OTT platforms, defining them as streaming services that deliver content directly over the internet, bypassing traditional broadcast channels. These platforms offer a variety of content, including movies, TV shows, and original productions, allowing users to access content on-demand across multiple devices.The historical context covers the early days of streaming, starting with Netflix's inception in 1997 as a DVD rental service and its transition to streaming in 2007. The presentation also highlights India's television journey, from the launch of Doordarshan in 1959 to the introduction of Direct-to-Home (DTH) satellite television in 2000, which expanded viewing choices and set the stage for the rise of OTT platforms like Big Flix, Ditto TV, Sony LIV, Hotstar, and Netflix. The business models of OTT platforms are explored in detail. Subscription Video on Demand (SVOD) models, exemplified by Netflix and Amazon Prime Video, offer unlimited content access for a monthly fee. Transactional Video on Demand (TVOD) models, like iTunes and Sky Box Office, allow users to pay for individual pieces of content. Advertising-Based Video on Demand (AVOD) models, such as YouTube and Facebook Watch, provide free content supported by advertisements. Hybrid models combine elements of SVOD and AVOD, offering flexibility to cater to diverse audience preferences.
Content acquisition strategies are also discussed, highlighting the dual approach of purchasing broadcasting rights for existing films and TV shows and investing in original content production. This section underscores the importance of a robust content library in attracting and retaining subscribers.The presentation addresses the challenges faced by OTT platforms, including the unpredictability of content acquisition and audience preferences. It emphasizes the difficulty of balancing content investment with returns in a competitive market, the high costs associated with marketing, and the need for continuous innovation and adaptation to stay relevant.
The impact of OTT platforms on the Bollywood film industry is significant. The competition for viewers has led to a decrease in cinema ticket sales, affecting the revenue of Bollywood films that traditionally rely on theatrical releases. Additionally, OTT platforms now pay less for film rights due to the uncertain success of films in cinemas.
Looking ahead, the future of OTT in India appears promising. The market is expected to grow by 20% annually, reaching a value of ₹1200 billion by the end of the decade. The increasing availability of affordable smartphones and internet access will drive this growth, making OTT platforms a primary source of entertainment for many viewers.
Implicitly or explicitly all competing businesses employ a strategy to select a mix
of marketing resources. Formulating such competitive strategies fundamentally
involves recognizing relationships between elements of the marketing mix (e.g.,
price and product quality), as well as assessing competitive and market conditions
(i.e., industry structure in the language of economics).
Tata Group Dials Taiwan for Its Chipmaking Ambition in Gujarat’s DholeraAvirahi City Dholera
The Tata Group, a titan of Indian industry, is making waves with its advanced talks with Taiwanese chipmakers Powerchip Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation (PSMC) and UMC Group. The goal? Establishing a cutting-edge semiconductor fabrication unit (fab) in Dholera, Gujarat. This isn’t just any project; it’s a potential game changer for India’s chipmaking aspirations and a boon for investors seeking promising residential projects in dholera sir.
Visit : https://www.avirahi.com/blog/tata-group-dials-taiwan-for-its-chipmaking-ambition-in-gujarats-dholera/
SATTA MATKA SATTA FAST RESULT KALYAN TOP MATKA RESULT KALYAN SATTA MATKA FAST RESULT MILAN RATAN RAJDHANI MAIN BAZAR MATKA FAST TIPS RESULT MATKA CHART JODI CHART PANEL CHART FREE FIX GAME SATTAMATKA ! MATKA MOBI SATTA 143 spboss.in TOP NO1 RESULT FULL RATE MATKA ONLINE GAME PLAY BY APP SPBOSS
How MJ Global Leads the Packaging Industry.pdfMJ Global
MJ Global's success in staying ahead of the curve in the packaging industry is a testament to its dedication to innovation, sustainability, and customer-centricity. By embracing technological advancements, leading in eco-friendly solutions, collaborating with industry leaders, and adapting to evolving consumer preferences, MJ Global continues to set new standards in the packaging sector.
Unveiling the Dynamic Personalities, Key Dates, and Horoscope Insights: Gemin...my Pandit
Explore the fascinating world of the Gemini Zodiac Sign. Discover the unique personality traits, key dates, and horoscope insights of Gemini individuals. Learn how their sociable, communicative nature and boundless curiosity make them the dynamic explorers of the zodiac. Dive into the duality of the Gemini sign and understand their intellectual and adventurous spirit.
Discover timeless style with the 2022 Vintage Roman Numerals Men's Ring. Crafted from premium stainless steel, this 6mm wide ring embodies elegance and durability. Perfect as a gift, it seamlessly blends classic Roman numeral detailing with modern sophistication, making it an ideal accessory for any occasion.
https://rb.gy/usj1a2
3 Simple Steps To Buy Verified Payoneer Account In 2024SEOSMMEARTH
Buy Verified Payoneer Account: Quick and Secure Way to Receive Payments
Buy Verified Payoneer Account With 100% secure documents, [ USA, UK, CA ]. Are you looking for a reliable and safe way to receive payments online? Then you need buy verified Payoneer account ! Payoneer is a global payment platform that allows businesses and individuals to send and receive money in over 200 countries.
If You Want To More Information just Contact Now:
Skype: SEOSMMEARTH
Telegram: @seosmmearth
Gmail: seosmmearth@gmail.com
The 10 Most Influential Leaders Guiding Corporate Evolution, 2024.pdfthesiliconleaders
In the recent edition, The 10 Most Influential Leaders Guiding Corporate Evolution, 2024, The Silicon Leaders magazine gladly features Dejan Štancer, President of the Global Chamber of Business Leaders (GCBL), along with other leaders.
LA HUG - Video Testimonials with Chynna Morgan - June 2024Lital Barkan
Have you ever heard that user-generated content or video testimonials can take your brand to the next level? We will explore how you can effectively use video testimonials to leverage and boost your sales, content strategy, and increase your CRM data.🤯
We will dig deeper into:
1. How to capture video testimonials that convert from your audience 🎥
2. How to leverage your testimonials to boost your sales 💲
3. How you can capture more CRM data to understand your audience better through video testimonials. 📊
B2B payments are rapidly changing. Find out the 5 key questions you need to be asking yourself to be sure you are mastering B2B payments today. Learn more at www.BlueSnap.com.
Navigating the world of forex trading can be challenging, especially for beginners. To help you make an informed decision, we have comprehensively compared the best forex brokers in India for 2024. This article, reviewed by Top Forex Brokers Review, will cover featured award winners, the best forex brokers, featured offers, the best copy trading platforms, the best forex brokers for beginners, the best MetaTrader brokers, and recently updated reviews. We will focus on FP Markets, Black Bull, EightCap, IC Markets, and Octa.
Best practices for project execution and deliveryCLIVE MINCHIN
A select set of project management best practices to keep your project on-track, on-cost and aligned to scope. Many firms have don't have the necessary skills, diligence, methods and oversight of their projects; this leads to slippage, higher costs and longer timeframes. Often firms have a history of projects that simply failed to move the needle. These best practices will help your firm avoid these pitfalls but they require fortitude to apply.
1. Accountant Liability : The D & O Diary
Kevin M. LaCroix is an attorney
and Executive Vice President,
OakBridge Insurance Services,
Beachwood,Ohio, a division of R-
Home > Accountant Liability > T Specialty, LLC. OakBridge is an
insurance intermediary focused
exclusively on management
Audit Firms' Litigation Woes Mount, Report Shows liability issues. MORE...
Posted on July 23, 2009 by Kevin LaCroix About
As reflected in a recently released and detailed analysis of audit firms’ current litigation Services
and prior lawsuit settlements, the audit firs’ litigation challenges are a serious and
Contact
growing problem. The July 2009 presentation by Mark Cheffers, the CEO of Audit
Analytics, is entitled "Accounting Professional Liability: Scorecards and Commentary" Archives
and can be found here. According to a July 22, 2009 Compliance Week article (here),
Cheffers presented the slides at a recent litigation conference cosponsored by the
American Bar Association and the American Law Institute.
The presentation materials reflect very detailed information about the major accounting firms’ litigation. Among
other things, the presentation aggregates the top 50 accounting malpractice settlements since 1999. The data
show that Ernst & Young has paid the largest amount in malpractice settlements during that period, totaling
$1.92 billion. KPMG follows with settlements totaling $1.42 billion, followed by PricewaterhouseCoopers at
$1.27 billion and Delotte & Touche at $1.25 billion.
As detailed in the presentation, the audit firms now face huge potential exposure from the growing numbers of
lawsuits that have been filed against them in connection with the credit crisis and the Madoff scandal. Cheffers’
presentation lists the current litigation scorecard of cases that have been filed against the audit firms. According
to the Compliance Week article, Cheffers said at the conference that these lawsuits filed so far are "likely just the
beginning."
The presentation also shows the prevalence of going concern audit opinions, both in terms of percentage of all
audit opinions and in absolute numerical terms. The presentation shows that in 2008 going concern opinions,
both in percentage terms and in absolute numbers were at their highest level in the past decade
There may well be other places where this kind of information about audit firm liability exposure has previously
been compiled, but this is the first time I have seen the information presented this comprehensively. The
information presented in the slides is fascinating and one can only hope that Cheffers will continue to update
the information and continue to make it publicly available.
TAGS: Accountant Liability
Comments (1) Trackbacks (1) Share Link
KPMG Settles Options Backdating Gatekeeper Claim for $22.5
Million
Posted on June 16, 2009 by Kevin LaCroix
Enter keywords:
In the latest twist in the long-running options backdating saga, and in what appears
to be a significant milestone in the options backdating-related gatekeeper claims, on
June 15, 2009, Vitesse Semiconductor announced (here) that it had reached a
http://www.dandodiary.com/articles/accountant-liability/[17-06-2011 22:03:15]
2. Accountant Liability : The D & O Diary
settlement with its former auditor, KPMG LLP, in connection with the option
backdating related allegations. In the settlement KPMG agreed to pay $22.5 million
Add this blog to your feeds or
and to forgive past indebtedness.
subscribe by email MORE...
Enter email address
As discussed at greater length here, in June 2007,Vitesse sued KPMG in Los Angeles County Superior Court
alleging that KPMG had been negligent in auditing the company’s stock option grants and financial statements
during the years 1994 to 2000. Vitesse later amended the complaint to include the years 2001 to 2004.
Vitesse itself had been the subject of an options backdating-related securities class action lawsuit in the Central This multipart series explores the
basics of directors' and officers'
District of California, as described here. Vitesse settled that lawsuit for a payment $10.2 million in cash, $8.75
liability insurance. The index for
million of which came from the company’s D&O insurance carrier, and the balance in payments from individual
this series can be found here.
defendants. The settlement also included the transfer of shares of Vitesse stock from Vitesse and from the
individual defendants.
AIM
The plaintiffs in the options backdating securities lawsuit had also sued KPMG and as reflected here, on June
Accountant Liability
16, 2008, the parties to the securities lawsuit filed a stipulation of settlement in which KPMG agreed to
contribute $7.750 million toward the class settlement. Blogging
Class Action Settlements
KPMG’s recent $22.5 million settlement of Vitesse’s own lawsuit is in addition to KPMG’s separate $7.750 Corporate Governance
million contribution to the settlement of the securities class action lawsuit. D & O Insurance
ERISA
As I recently noted (here), the options backdating securities class action lawsuits themselves appear to be Earnings Guidance
winding down, but until word circulated of KPMG’s settlement with Vitesse, I had not heard of the resolution of
Enron
any cases that companies themselves had filed against their outside professional advisors.
Environmental Liability
Executive Compensation
Even if there were prior outside gatekeeper settlements that I missed, the KPMG settlement with Vitesse has to
be the most significant settlement between an outside gatekeeper and a company with respect to the options Failed Banks
backdating scandal. It will be interesting to see whether the final stage of the options backdating saga includes Fair Labor Standards Act
further significant gatekeeper claim resolutions. Given the magnitude of the KPMG settlement, it would Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
certainly seem that there could be other significant settlements and perhaps even the assertion of additional
Hedge Funds
claims.
IPO Laddering Cases
IPOs
I would be very interested to know if readers are aware of the resolution of any other cases that companies have
filed against their outside professionals in connection with the options backdating scandal. Insider Trading
International D & O
As noted here, KPMG is also the subject of a trustee’s claim in connection with the New Century Financial Corp. Madoff Litigation
bankruptcy proceeding. KPMG also remains a defendant in the New Century subprime-related securities class McNulty Memo
action lawsuit, after its motion to dismiss in that case was denied, as discussed here.
Opt-Outs
Options Backdating
How Will GM Sell Cars Now?: General Motors certainly faces a daunting challenge trying to sell cars as a
Outside Director Liability
bankrupt company. I have posted a video link below of an irreverent but particularly funny take on what a
bankrupt GM’s ads might look like. The spoof ad does a great job ripping conventional car ad clichés, which PCAOB
clearly won’t work now (if they ever did). PIPEs Financing
Hat tip to the Planet Money blog for the link to the video. Warning, the ad contains language some might Patriot Act
consider offensive. Paulson Committee
Plaintiffs' Bar
Private Equity
Proxy Statements
Regulatory Reform
SOX (Generally)
SOX Whistleblower
Securities Litigation
Share Buybacks
http://www.dandodiary.com/articles/accountant-liability/[17-06-2011 22:03:15]
3. Accountant Liability : The D & O Diary
Shareholders Derivative Litigation
Subprime Litigation
Thompson Memo
Videos
Warren Buffett
TAGS: Accountant Liability, Options Backdating, accountants liability, gatekeeper liability Archives
Comments Trackbacks Share Link
All China, All the Time
New Century Trustee Sues KPMG; Will Other Gatekeeper Eleventh Circuit Affirms
HomeBanc Subprime Securities
Claims Follow? Suit Dismissal
Supreme Court Holds Fund
Posted on April 2, 2009 by Kevin LaCroix
Management Company Cannot
In a development that may foreshadow further "gatekeeper" claims as part of the Be Held Liable for Funds'
Statements
current credit crisis litigation wave, on April 1, 2009, the trustee for the New
Century Financial Corp. liquidation initiated lawsuits in California and New York Should Directors Be Held Liable
More Often?
against KPMG and its international parent, seeking to recover $1 billion in damages
for negligence and for aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary duty. Predicting the Supreme Court's
Decision in Janus
Securities Litigation: Variations on
The California complaint, filed in the Los Angeles County Superior Court (copy here) against KPMG LLP, alleges a Chinese Theme
that the firm "did not act like a watchdog" but rather "acted like a cheerleader for management."
Confidential Witness Statements
Lead to Dismissal Motion Denial
in Regions Financial Subprime
The complaint alleges that KPMG "performed grossly negligent audits and reviews" and "failed to detect
Securities Lawsuit
material errors" with respect to New Century’s residual interest on loans it securitized and on its loan
repurchase liability. The complaint also faulted KPMG for its approval of faulty loan loss reserves, alleging that Supreme Court Reverses Fifth
Circuit in Halliburton Case; Proof
an audit partner silenced the concerns of a more junior audit team member who questioned the reserve of Loss Causation Not Required
calculation. At Class Certification Stage
D&O Insurance: Does
"Fraudulent" Mean "Fraudulent"?
The complaint also alleges that KPMG "aided and abetted New Century’s directors’ and officers’ breaches of
their fiduciary duties." The complaint alleges that KPMG knew that management was improperly reserving for In a Must-Read Opinion,
risks the company faced and that management had failed to implement an effective system of internal controls. Delaware Court Rejects Bid to
Block Massey Merger
Yet Another Lawsuit Following
The aiding and abetting allegations includes the charge that KPMG aided and abetted company officials "in "No" Vote on "Say on Pay"
maintaining material weaknesses and significant deficiencies in New Century’s system of internal controls over
White Collar Crime-Fighting and
financial reporting." The complaint alleges that KPMG is "jointly responsible with the directors and officers for Other Web Notes
damages resulting from these breaches."
The complaint seeks compensatory damages of $1 billion, as well as punitive damages. Madoff Investor and Feeder Fund
Litigation: The List
Subprime Lawsuits DIsmissal
The complaint filed in the Southern District of New York (copy here) substantially repeats many of the same Motion Grants and Denials
allegations as the California complaint, but addresses the alleged liability of KPMG’s international parent. The
Counting the Subprime-Related
complaint alleges that the parent represented that it would "ensure that member firms’ work would meet
Derivative Lawsuits
professional standards and regulatory requirements."
Counting the Subprime Securities
Class Action Lawsuits
The complaint alleges that KPMG International did not fulfill these responsibilities, and as a result New Century Options Backdating Settlements,
was harmed. The complaint seeks unspecified compensatory as well as punitive damages from KPMG Dismissals and Denials
International.
Counting the Options Backdating
Lawsuits
The trustee’s filings in these complaints certainly suggest the possibility that auditors and other "gatekeepers"
could be targeted in the wake of the subprime meltdown. Leading accounting indusrty commentator Francine
McKenna (also the author of the indispensible "re:The Auditors" blog) is quoted in the April 1, 2009 Wall Street Cyber Inquirer
Journal as saying that the case "may embolden others to look more closely at the possibiltiy of bringing Delaware Corporate and
[accounting] firms to some level of culpability for the things that happened" that led to the credit crisis. Commercial Litigation Blog
Drug and Device Law
But in assessing that possibility it may be important to note the particular key circumstances that preceded the III Insurance Industry Blog
trustee’s claims against KPMG.Specifically, the new lawsuits follow more than a year after the February 29,
PLI Securities Law Practice
http://www.dandodiary.com/articles/accountant-liability/[17-06-2011 22:03:15]
4. Accountant Liability : The D & O Diary
2008 581-page report of Michael Missal, the KPMG bankruptcy examiner, in which the examiner concluded that Center
KPMG had "contributed" to certain of New Century’s "accounting and reporting deficiencies by enabling them to
PLUS Blog
persist in, and in some instances, precipitating the Company’s departure from, applicable accounting
standards." A detailed review of the examiner’s report, including a link to the report itself, can be found here. Pension Risk Matters
SOX First
The examiner’s exhaustive review, which among other things specifically suggested the possibility of negligence Securities Docket
claims against KPMG, was effectively a road map for the April 1 lawsuits. While the lawsuits might well have Securities Litigation Watch
been filed even without the examiner’s report, few other prospective claimants considering "gatekeeper"
The 10b-5 Daily
litigation will have such a detailed script from which to compose their complaint.
The AAO Weblog
On the other hand, many of the complaints already filed in numerous lawsuits as part of the current subprime The CorporateCounsel.net
and credit crisis-related litigation wave have already targeted a variety of gatekeepers, including offering The D&O E&O Monitor
underwriters, credit rating agencies, and, in some cases, even the outside auditors.
The FCPA Blog
The Harvard Law School
Indeed, the securities lawsuit filed against New Century’s former directors and officers also specifically named Corporate Governance Blog
KPMG as a defendant. In his December 3, 2008 order denying the defendants’ motion to dismiss the securities The Race to the Bottom
lawsuit, Central District of California Judge Dean Pregerson specifically denied KPMG’s separate motion to
WSJ Law Blog
dismiss, finding that the complaint in that case adequately alleged that KPMG was aware of accounting and
internal control deficiencies but nevertheless issued its audit opinion in connection with the company’s 2005 White Collar Crime Prof Blog
financial statements. A detailed discussion of Judge Pregerson’s decision, including a link to the opinion, can be With Vigour and Zeal
found here.
re:The Auditors
The outcome of KPMG’s dismissal motion in the New Century securities lawsuit, as well as the trustee’s filing of
the April 1 lawsuit, among other things suggests that the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in the Stoneridge case
may not deter prospective litigants from pursuing claims against auditors and other gatekeepers.
One of the more interesting aspects of the trustee’s complaint against KPMG is his claim seeking to hold the
accounting firm "jointly responsible" with New Century’s former directors and officers for the officials’ breaches
of their fiduciary duties. While the trustee’s claims at this point represent nothing more than allegations and it
remains to be seen whether his claims on this theory will result in any recovery, the possibility that auditors may
be alleged to be "jointly liable" for directors’ and officers’ fiduciary breaches raises a host of concerns and
questions, not the least of which relate to co-defendant (or third-party defendant) proceedings, such as cross-
claims for contribution.
All of which leads to a point I have been asserting for some time, which is that we are still only in the earliest
stages of the credit crisis related litigation wave. Not only are the cases against the defendant companies
continuing to pour in, but the likelihood of further gatekeeper litigation like that filed against KPMG suggests
that the litigation will continue for many, many years to come.
The "re: The Auditors" blog has an interesting and detailed analysis of the KPMG complaints, here.
Hat tip to the Wall Street Journal (here) for copies of the KPMG complaints.
Honoring Those Who Serve: A recent MSNBC segment reported on what my good friends, David Bell of
AWAC and John McCarrick of the Edwards and Angell law firm, have been doing to honor those who have made
the ultimate sacrifice in service to our country. As reflected in the video below, a group they helped to organize,
Grateful Nation Montana, is taking steps to ensure that the children of U.S. soldiers killed in the battle will be
able to pursue a college education.
Please watch this video. It is guaranteed to bring tears to your eyes, but it will also make you appreciate the
efforts of a couple of industry leaders, who have done something substantial and worthy to help make a
difference.
http://www.dandodiary.com/articles/accountant-liability/[17-06-2011 22:03:15]
5. Accountant Liability : The D & O Diary
TAGS: Accountant Liability, New Century Financial Corp., Subprime Litigation
Comments (3) Trackbacks Share Link
So What About Auditor Liability Caps?
Posted on April 24, 2008 by Kevin LaCroix
One of the recurring suggestions in would-be reformers' standard litany of proposed changes
for litigation relief is the introduction of auditor liability caps. For example, the Committee
on Capital Markets Regulation interim report (about which refer here) proposed the
“elimination or reduction of gatekeeper litigation, either through a cap on auditor liability or
creation of a safe harbor for certain auditor practices.” Similarly, in early 2007, the European Commission
launched a study (about which refer here) on “whether there is a need to reform the rules on auditor liability in
the EU.”
But while these initiatives are only at the proposal or study phase, the U.K. has moved forward to permit
“auditor liability limitation agreements,” under legal provisions that recently went into effect. The newly
effective provisions are part of the Companies Act of 2006 (refer here for the Act’s text). The auditor liability
limitation provisions are contained in Sections 532 to 538 of the Act, which took effect on April 6, 2008,
according to the Act’s implementation timetable (here). For background regarding the Act, refer here.
The Act allows auditors to limit their liability by contract, provided that their client’s shareholders approve.
Section 534(1) of the Act allows auditors to limit their liability “in respect of any negligence, default, breach of
duty or breach of trust, occurring in the course of an audit of accounts.” The limitation cannot cover more than
one financial year and it must be approved by a resolution of shareholders. Under Section 537, the liability
limitations are not effective except to the extent they are “fair and reasonable” in the particular circumstances.
The Act itself does not specify the particular kinds of limitations that are allowable nor does it prescribe the
form the limitation is to take. However, a working group of the Financial Reporting Council, the supervisory
body for U.K. auditors, has proposed “draft guidance” (here) suggesting ways that the limitation agreement
might be framed. The FRC guidance document even includes specimen language to be used as a reference in
preparing limitation agreements.
The FRC guidance suggests three alternative ways the auditor’s liability might be limited: (a) proportionality,
“where the auditor’s liability is limited to his share of the company’s loss, taking into account the liability of
others”; (b) fair and reasonable, “where the auditor’s liability is limited to such amount as is fair and
reasonable in accordance with Section 537 of the Act”; or (c) monetary cap, “where the auditor’s liability is
limited to a particular amount, which is either stated or calculated in some way, e.g.. as a multiple of audit fees.”
The Act’s auditor liability limitation provisions represent an interesting experiment, but it will be even more
interesting to see how widespread the acceptance of auditor liability limitations agreements becomes. The Act’s
requirements themselves may deter widespread adoption, particularly the one-year time limitation and the
requirement for shareholder approval. One might also conjecture that there might be some stigma associated
with a company’s agreement to limit its auditor’s liability, to the extent the existence of an agreement is
interpreted to suggest that the only way the company could procure an auditor’s services was by granting the
auditor a liability limitation. There is also legal uncertainty surrounding such issues as the extraterritorial effect
of any limitations, which may be of particular concern for auditors of companies that have shareholders,
creditors or other business partners outside the U.K.
It is probably also relevant that the auditor liability provisions were adopted as part of the Companies Act,
which also contains provisions defining directors’ duties and incorporating new statutory procedures for
bringing claims against directors. One wonders whether a company’s directors, newly sensitized to their duties
and potential litigation risks, will be comfortable relieving their auditors of liability to the company for
negligence or other misconduct. Even though the liability limitation has to be approved by shareholders, you can
imagine the second-guessing and accusations that might surface if problems do arise later.
http://www.dandodiary.com/articles/accountant-liability/[17-06-2011 22:03:15]
6. Accountant Liability : The D & O Diary
Within its draft guidance document, the FRC anticipates that companies may well wrestle with the question
whether (or even why) they should agree to limit their auditor’s liability, and expressly observes that directors
“will wish to establish that it is in the company’s interest to enter into a liability limitation agreement.” The
guidance document does not attempt to suggest what interest a company would have in limiting its auditor’s
liability.
Along with the question of what the take-up of the limitation agreement will be for U.K. companies is the
question whether other jurisdictions will adopt the U.K. approach or similar auditor liability limitation
provisions. A March 2006 report by Michael Gass and Ashwani Kochlar of Edwards Angell Palmer & Dodge
entitled “U.K. Gives Auditor Liability Agreements a Greenlight, But U.S. is Unlikely to Do the Same” (same)
takes a look at the new U.K. provisions and considers the possibilities for reform efforts in the U.S. The report
concludes that current U.S. reform efforts are “ill-timed” and that given the turmoil in the financial markets,
“garnering attention and support to adopt proposals … will be challenging” – unless one of the Big Four
accounting firms implodes, in which case “all bets are off.”
The CorporateCounsel.net Blog also has an interesting post here discussing the newly effective U.K. provisions
and expressing skepticism for the likelihood of auditor liability reform in the U.S. anytime soon.
Readers interested in the topic of auditor liability caps may want to refer back to my earlier post, here, in which
I discuss the very interesting alternative proposal of George Washington University law professor Lawrence
Cunningham. Professor Cunningham suggests having the audit firms issue bonds to the capital markets as a way
to provide financial protection for their liability risks.
U.K. Government to Appeal BAE Systems Ruling: In a recent post (here), I reviewed the April 10, 2008
decision by the U.K.’s High Court of Justice against the British government’s decision to terminate the
investigation of alleged bribery involving BAE Systems in connection with a Saudi arms deal.
On April 22, 2008, Transparency International, on its own behalf as well as on behalf of several other
organizations, wrote (here) to the U.K. Attorney General “urging the government not to appeal the
judgment.” The letter stated that “halting the investigation has caused untold damage, both to the reputation of
the U.K. and to global efforts to improve governance and combat corruption.” The letter also urged that the
action to drop the investigation has “reduced [the U.K.’s] standing among its peers” in the OECD, and any move
by the government to appeal “would compound the reputational damage to the U.K.” and would undermine the
implementation of the United Nations Convention Against Corruption.
Nevertheless, on April 22, 2008, the Serious Fraud Office announced (here) that it will “seek permission to
appeal to the House of Lords” against the lower court’s April 10 judgment. The SFO’s announcement quoted the
current SFO director as saying that the April 10 judgment “raises principles of general public importance
affecting, among other things, the independence of prosecutors and the role of the court in reviewing a
prosecutor’s evaluation of the public interest in a case like this.”
It is very hard to argue that the U.K.’s efforts to suppress the BAE Systems investigation will not undermine its
efforts elsewhere to fight corrupt practices. The unmistakable message is that the U.K. only cares about small
scale corruption involving the less powerful, those whom the U.K. feels it can safely push around; but that these
impediments can be overcome if the bribe is large enough and the corrupt official powerful enough. Nothing
could do more to breed cynicism over anticorruption efforts that for the U.K. government to successfully
suppress this investigation.
Hat tip to the Sox First blog (here) for the links to the Transparency International and Serious Fraud Office
announcements.
Time Out for an Idol Thought: I was delighted to learn that my former partner from the Ross, Dixon & Bell
law firm, Bill Hopkins, now apparently known by his nom de plume Will Hopkins, is a finalist in the American
Idol songwriting competition. The WSJ.com Law Blog has an excellent interview of Bill, er, Will, here.
Hopkins, we shall call him, left active law practice to try to write music about the same time I left the law firm to
become involved on the business side of insurance. Everyone must follow their own muse, I suppose.
Speakers' Corner: On Monday April 28, 2008, I will be speaking as a panelist at the C5 Conference on
Securities Litigation in London, on a panel entitled "Liability Never Goes Away:Managing Risk and Tackling
D&O Liability" The conference features a number of very distinguished speakers. A copy of the seminar
materials, including conference agenda, can be found here. If you are attending the conference, I hope you will
make it a point to greet me.
TAGS: Accountant Liability, Auditor Liability Caps, Companies Act 2006, Limited Liabiltiy Agreements,
Litigation Reform
Comments Trackbacks Share Link
New Century Examiner's Report Faults KPMG, Company
Officials
http://www.dandodiary.com/articles/accountant-liability/[17-06-2011 22:03:15]
7. Accountant Liability : The D & O Diary
Posted on March 27, 2008 by Kevin LaCroix
In a sweeping 581-page report (here), the examiner appointed in connection with the New
Century Financial Corporation bankruptcy found that New Century “engaged in a number
of significant improper and imprudent practices related to its loan originations” that
“created a ticking time bomb that detonated in 2007.”
Bankruptcy examiner Michael J. Missal issued his report as part of the investigation he undertook at the request
of New Century’s bankruptcy trustee to examine “any and all accounting and financial statement irregularities,
errors and misstatements.” The report is dated February 29, 2008, but it was unsealed on March 26, 2008 at
the request of former New Century Employees.
The examiner’s report concludes that New Century “had a brazen obsession with increasing loan originations,
without due regard to the risks associate with that business strategy.” The report also concludes that New
Century “engaged in at least seven wide-ranging accounting practices in 2005 and 2006” that “resulted in
material misstatements of the Company’s financial statements.” The examiner did not find sufficient evidence to
conclude that New Century engaged in earnings management or manipulation “although its accounting
irregularities almost always resulted in increased earnings.”
The report also states that New Century’s outside accounting firm, KPMG, “contributed to certain of these
accounting and financial reporting deficiencies by enabling them to persist and, in some instances, precipitating
the Company’s departure from applicable accounting standards.”
The report states that as a result of New Century’s accounting failures New Century understated its repurchase
reserve in the third quarter of 2006 by 100%, and reported a quarterly profit of $63.5 million when it should
have reported a loss.” In addition, the accounting errors resulted in the payment of performance bonuses to key
executives in 2005 “that were at least 300% more than they should have been.” New Century also made “a
number of false and misleading statements in its public filings, press releases and other communications.”
Based on his investigation, the examiner believes that “several causes of action may be available to the estate.”
First, the report concludes that the estate may be able to assert causes of action against KPMG for “professional
negligence and negligent misrepresentations.” Second, the estate may be able to assert causes of action against
former officers “to recover certain of the bonuses… that were tied, directly or indirectly, to the incorrect
financial statements.” These causes of action, the report states, “could seek million of dollars of recoveries.”
The examiner also considered whether the company’s former officials breached their fiduciary duties, and
whether the estate has possible claims against the officials. The report notes that any assertion of these claims
would have “strong defenses to overcome, particularly the business judgment rule and statutory and other
limitations.”
While the examiner’s conclusions may (and undoubtedly will) be the subject of substantial debate, the report’s
analysis of the company’s loan origination practices and accounting shortcomings is remarkably detailed. The
sheer sweep and magnitude of the report and the depth of its detail could make New Century the poster child
for the excesses of the subprime lending boom, evoking inevitable comparisons with Enron as the byword for an
entire era. Indeed, the report suggests a number of echoes from that earlier period, including in particular the
accounting firm’s supposed complicity in the company’s alleged excesses.
The fallout from the subprime meltdown will continue to accumulate in the months and years to come, but the
New Century bankruptcy examiner’s report may represent the first installment on the history of the era.
A March 26, 2008 Bloomberg.com article discussing the examiner’s report can be found here. A March 27,
2008 Wall Street Journal article discussing the report can be found here.
TAGS: Accountant Liability, New Century Financial Corp., Subprime Lawsuits, Subprime Litigation,
suprime-related litigation
Comments (1) Trackbacks (1) Share Link
Fraud Detection and the "Expectations Gap"
Posted on November 19, 2007 by Kevin LaCroix
As a result of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other reforms, a variety of structures and
procedures were put into place to try to prevent or detect fraud. A number of these
reforms involve auditors and the audit profession, in the implicit assumption that auditors
have an important role to play in preventing and detecting corporate fraud. But a recent
Grant Thornton survey (here) shows that many CFOs still do not feel constrained by their
auditors' oversight, notwithstanding the reform measures.
According to the survey, 62% of the 221 CFOs surveyed believe it would be possible to intentionally misstate
their financial statements to their auditors. As one commentator in the November 15, 2007 CFO.com article
(here) commenting on the survey put it, these numbers are "alarming," given that "CFOs - if they've a mind to -
http://www.dandodiary.com/articles/accountant-liability/[17-06-2011 22:03:15]
8. Accountant Liability : The D & O Diary
are in a unique position, having the necessary information, intelligence and access to trick auditors in ways that
are hard to decipher."
Indeed, it is disconcerting that nearly two-thirds of CFOs feel they could fool their auditors on intentionally
falsified financial statements. Clearly, if such a large percentage of CFOs feel they could, some of them might,
and a few of them will. This intimation of the possibility of undetected fraud should be disconcerting to
investors, analysts, and others (including D & O underwriters) who rely on auditors' assurance that the financial
statements are free from "material misstatement."
The disappointment and even anger that investors and others feel when they find they have been misled by
falsified financial statements often encompasses a sense of frustration that the auditors failed to detect the
fraud. Accordingly, auditors are often named as co-defendants in securities fraud lawsuits, based on a failure to
detect the fraud and the auditors' statements that there are no material misstatements in the financial
statements.
But a further Grant Thornton survey finding underscores the theoretical limitations of audit fraud detection. 83
percent of the surveyed CFOs said they did not feel that it was even possible for auditors to detect corporate
fraud in all cases. This survey finding embodies the same sentiment expressed in the November 2006 statement
of the heads of the six leading accounting firms entitled "Global Capital Markets and the Global Economy: A
Vision From the CEOs of the International Audit Networks" (here). The accounting industry leaders noted that
"there are limits to what auditors can reasonably uncover, given the limits inherent in today's audits." They go
on to note that while there are audit techniques whose principal goals are to "ascertain whether fraud has
occurred," these techniques are "not foolproof, nor can they be expected to be."
The problem for everyone, both auditors and those who rely in their audits, is that there is, in the words of the
industry leaders' statement, an "expectations gap." According to the accounting leaders, the gap arises because
"many investors, policy makers, and the media believe that the auditor's main function is to detect all fraud, and
thus, where it materializes and auditors have failed to find it, the auditors are presumed to be at fault." The
accounting leaders go on to assert that:
Given the inherent limitations of any outside party to discover the presence of fraud, the
restrictions governing the methods auditors are allowed to use, and the cost constraints of the
audit itself, this presumption is not aligned with the current auditing standards.
The accounting leaders' frustration is palpable; they apparently recognize, as do the CFOs that responded to the
Grant Thornton survey, that management bent on misrepresenting their company's financial condition can
conceal the misrepresentations from the auditors. But the reason there is nonetheless an expectations gap is
that investors and others do rely, as they must, on company's audited financial statements. Merely naming the
problem as an expectations gap, or citing the limitations of current auditing standards, does not address the
problem, which is that investors and others rely on the audited financial statements in ways the auditors
apparently wish they wouldn't or believe they shouldn't. It almost seems as if the auditors' message to those who
would rely on financial statements is - don't (or, at least, not so much).
Given the CFOs' and the accounting leaders' recognition of the limitations of audit fraud detection, it may be
well argued that audited financial statements in fact should not be relied upon. But what alternative do investors
have? The investors necessarily place some value on the fact that professionals independent of management
have examined the financial statements.
It is nevertheless a significant concern that nearly two-thirds of CFOs believe they can fool their auditors. And
apparently the auditors agree with the general proposition as well. This ought to make anyone who needs must
rely on audited financial statements very uneasy.
Special thanks to John Condon at Audit Integrity for the link to the survey results and the CFO.com article.
A Service Error Apology: I am sorry that early in the evening on November 19, 2007, my syndication service
spontaneously generated an erroneous email with the cryptic message "Forbidden 403." (For those, like me,
who have to know, Error 403 messages are explained --sort of -- here.) I do not know why this error message
was sent. I apologize to all of my readers for the unsolicited distribution email. I am attempting to ensure that
this error will not recur.
TAGS: Accountant Liability
Comments Trackbacks Share Link
An Alternative to Auditor Liability Caps?
http://www.dandodiary.com/articles/accountant-liability/[17-06-2011 22:03:15]
9. Accountant Liability : The D & O Diary
Posted on September 11, 2007 by Kevin LaCroix
As the various blue-ribbon panels studying the competitiveness of the U.S. financial markets have proposed
various regulatory reforms, one recurring theme has been the proposal for auditor liability caps (refer here), a
topic that is also under study by the European Commission (refer here). A 2007 paper by Professor Lawrence
Cunningham of the George Washington University Law School entitled "Securitizing Audit Failure Risk: An
Alternative to Caps on Damages" (here) proposes an alternative to auditor liability caps for the risk of
catastrophic audit failure, by having the audit firms issue bonds to the capital markets to provide coverage for
the risks.
Cunningham notes that at the center of the arguments in support of auditor liability caps are concerns about the
limited availability of insurance for auditors; while these arguments are most persuasive during hard insurance
markets when insurance is relatively unavailable, the arguments may be less persuasive during soft insurance
markets when insurance is relatively more available. Cunningham notes that "proposals to cap liability that are
supported by arguments about lack of insurance may be unable to respond to the dynamics of these markets."
The likelihood of a legislative liability cap solution that is appropriately sensitive to these changing insurance
marketplace dynamics is unlikely.
But in any event, the periodic fluctuations of the insurance market clearly present limitations on the value of
insurance-based risk transfer mechanism; Cunningham's article reviews those limitations at length. As an
alternative to the insurance-based model, Cunningham proposes "insurance-based securitization" that would
"distribute risk of audit failure through the capital markets." Cunningham's proposal is modeled in the existing
use of catastrophe bonds (or cat bonds as they are more commonly known) to transfer risk for extreme property
loss or damage events. These bonds pool investor funds, which are invested in low-risk investment vehicles and
pay out interest income, with the principal available to pay loss in the event of the occurrence of certain defined
events. Cunningham proposes that just as these bonds are available to protect against the risk of natural events
such as earthquakes and hurricanes, similar types of bonds could also be used to protect against the risk of
catastrophic audit failure.
Cunningham advances a number of arguments in support of his proposal. Among other things, he argues that
managing these risks through the capital markets "should reduce the volatility that auditors have faced for
decades and that is an important basis for the insurance based arguments in favor of establishing ex ante
damage caps on auditor liability for auditor failures." Cunningham also argues that, through risk-sensitive
interest rate requirements, capital markets will introduce "capital market monitoring of auditing firm
performance." Finally, Cunningham notes that a private bond offering "is relatively simple for auditing firms to
complete compared to the political challenge necessary...to establish caps on damages."
Cunningham's innovative proposal is both novel and interesting. The general success of the existing cat bond
market does suggest the innovative potential of this proposal. I do have several concerns about the proposal
though, which are as follows.
In general, the cat bond market has extended only to first-party property damage risk, not to third-party liability
risk. I am guessing there are several reasons for this. The first is that the triggering event for a property cat bond
is easily identifiable, and the losses are short-tail - that is, the event occurs and the losses are ascertained within
a relatively short time thereafter. In contrast, a third-party liability claim can have a very protracted life with an
uncertain outcome. The extent and duration of this uncertainty may be ill-suited to the requirements of the
capital markets and of investors; the claims uncertainty could undermine reliable bond valuations during the
long duration of the claim.
In addition, the losses that trigger cat bond payments are beyond anyone's control; the mere existence of the
bonds do not and cannot attract claims. By contrast, the actions of third parties can cause events that would
trigger liability bond losses, and indeed the very existence of the bonds arguably could attract claims (consistent
with the old insurance adage that limits attract losses).
Along the same lines, the existing cat bond market is supported by a very sophisticated cat modeling industry
that produces robust, scientific frequency predictions concerning the likelihood of one of the triggering natural
events. As someone who as spent a lifetime pondering liability claim frequency and severity, I know that
projecting either liability frequency or severity are very difficult and uncertain enterprises. It would be a very
difficult task indeed to compose the kind of disclosure that would be required to provide investors with the kind
of projections these bonds would require in order to support a robust marketplace. This difficulty could require
interest rate payments on the bonds that could make the bonds uneconomical for the marketplace. (This same
principle is at work in insurance pricing, where the loss ratio insurers use as a pricing input is usually more
demanding than for property lines, leading to higher pricing requirments to account for the uncertainty.)
In addition, the big four accounting firms operate as private entities. Their history and their clients'
http://www.dandodiary.com/articles/accountant-liability/[17-06-2011 22:03:15]
10. Accountant Liability : The D & O Diary
expectations could both militate against their voluntarily undertaking the kind of disclosure investors would
require. Investors clearly would expect detailed information about the distribution of the firms' clientele, and
logically could expect disclosures about firm representation of certain specific companies. The level of disclosure
the accounting firms would be required to provide investors, even if limited to the context of a private offering
and to select investors, could prove to be a difficult if not insurmountable barrier for the accounting firms
themselves.
Finally, the whole value of a capital market based solution is to avoid the cyclicality and volatility of the
insurance marketplace, but the capital markets for these kinds of bonds could be subject to the own cyclicality.
Indeed, during a time of significant losses, there may be little or no market interest in bonds of this kind, just as
when insurer losses mount insurance can be scarce or unavailable. For that reason, I am uncertain whether the
availability of this type of capital market alternative, even if the other barriers could overcome, would in the end
remedy the concerns for which an alternative to the traditional insurance marketplace was sought.
These concerns notwithstanding, Professor Cunningham's paper is interesting and makes a valuable
contribution to the dialog surrounding proposed auditor liability caps. Special thanks to Professor Cunningham
for providing me with a link to his article.
UPDATE: Professor Cunningham Reponds: Here are Professor's Cunningham's responses to my
comments about his article:
Thanks, Kevin, for your thoughtful comments on my paper exploring adapting cat bonds to auditor liability.
Some more background on my motivations before addressing your concerns:
1. Statistical research (here and here) suggests a non-trivial medium-term risk that large liability cases could
destroy one of the remaining four big auditing firms and thus threaten our system of private auditing of public
enterprises.
2. Reducing this risk by putting legal caps on auditor damages is a hard political sell--Members of Congress
find it difficult explaining to American investors why these firms should enjoy such a privilege and any choice
of cap levels could seem arbitrary.
3. Proponents of caps currently have incentives, when in doubt, to interpret information in ways that
overstate the stakes (as when asserting that the prevalence of self-insurance is due to unavailability of
external insurance, a claim I evaluate in the paper).
4. Elsewhere, I endorse Josh Ronen's novel idea of financial statement insurance to address some such
problems, but recognize that it is also a hard political sell absent a crisis rationalizing the radical change it
entails.
5. Here, I consider cat bonds because they: (a) could add resources to meet claims that threaten to destroy
audit firms or the industry; (b) avoid political obstacles facing both caps and financial statement insurance;
and (c) highlight informational problems in the policy debate on caps.
On the substance of your excellent points about cat bonds, particularly how they are used in first-party
property damage contexts but not yet for third-party liability contexts:
1. True, property cat bonds address shorter tail losses than third-party claims usually do, raising concerns
addressed by contract and pricing. Cat bonds have a set contractual maturity, such as one year or two, and
state contractual triggering events that determine whether principal is repaid or lost at maturity (such as
judgments or settlements exceeding stated catastrophic amounts during the bond term). So bondholders don't
wait until claims are resolved before the payout determination is made. True, a bond's maturity date
influences strategic decisions in pending litigation (whether to settle or not and for how much). Contract terms
limit this capacity (through tailored rules governing litigation management and general principles like good
faith). These contractual features are priced into the bond.
2. Also true, property cat bonds address risks that are purely fortuitous while auditors have some control over
exposure, creating the serious problem of moral hazard. But moral hazard exists under existing external
insurance and even self-insurance to an extent. Worse, the fact that only four large firms exist can create
moral hazard if partners and employees act as if their firms are too big to fail (about which refer to my prior
paper, here). So reducing moral hazard seems vital. Financial statement insurance may be better than cat
bonds for that purpose but cat bonds contribute bondholders offering market monitoring to diminish the
problem not exacerbate it. Also, cat bonds do not attract suits against auditors because they fund only
http://www.dandodiary.com/articles/accountant-liability/[17-06-2011 22:03:15]
11. Accountant Liability : The D & O Diary
catastrophic loss layers, with negotiated triggers set at upwards of $500 million.
3. True, again, cat bonds for natural disasters are supported by scientific risk modeling tools enabling valid
predictions that may not be adaptable to auditing risks. Lacking requisite information could dissuade
investors from buying bonds, at least at interest rates less than costs of auditor self-insurance or external
insurance. But (a) the statistical research referred to earlier provides a foundation for such exercises and (b)
at least some reasonably reliable facsimile of such models seems necessary to justify political decisions to
establish caps on auditor liability by legal fiat.
4. Your fourth point seems the most compelling explanation for why auditors have not issued cat bonds and
presents the most significant impediment: for understandable reasons, firms don't want to disclose
information that investors would require about their client base, financial resources or claims history. Again,
however, similar data should be required to justify a political decision to cap liability or set optimal cap levels.
On this and the preceding point, it is possible to see informational problems as a sort of market failure
supporting regulatory intervention. Yet the information is within firms' control and they can decide whether to
use it in the political arena, in markets, or not at all. Notably, using this data in the political arena to support
caps creates incentives to overstate risk whereas using it in the marketplace to sell cat bonds creates
incentives to understate risk.
Admittedly, cat bonds may or may not work for auditing. But if they work or might work, this may weaken
arguments for caps (and could add protection against audit industry destruction); if they are shown to be
unworkable, this may strengthen the case for caps. So either way, I appreciate your giving the idea a public
forum for debate (and for your comments that will improve my paper). It would be wonderful if risk modeling
firms and investment banks would consider the idea, perhaps even pitch it to auditing firms, for a non-
academic test.
More About the AIM Challenge: Behind the reform proposals of the blue-ribbon panels mentioned above
are concerns about U.S. financial market's loss of IPO market share to overseas' securities markets, particularly
London's Alternative Investment Market (AIM) (about which I most recently commented here). But changing
marketplace conditions have put the AIM in an altogether different light, as illustrated in the September 10,
2007 Bloomberg.com article entitled "London's AIM Exchange Loses Members on Costs as Nasdaq Prospers"
(here).
According to the article, companies that have listed on AIM are starting to grow disenchanted. 116 companies
exited AIM in the first half of 2007, 35 more than a year earlier, and delisting more than doubled to 40 during
the same period, compared to 15 last year. (Delistings on Nasdaq meanwhile fell from 41 to 30.) Among other
reasons for these departures are high costs and a perceived lack of issuer company benefit - the AIM market is
"showing signs of saturation."
As one commentator cited in the article noted, while "there's a good market for small caps," the supply of
investment has not been able to keep up with the supply of equity. Another commentator cited in the article
notes that the increase in companies leaving AIM "is probably a reflection of the market having attracted too
many poor quality businesses," as there has been a "deluge of companies that should never have been brought to
market."
As I have noted before (refer here), the would-be reformers case for regulatory reform has always seemed to be
"weak," but as the global marketplace evolves there appear to be increasing reasons to question whether the
premise on which the reformers' proposals are based even exist. (For further commentary on this same topic,
refer here)
Subprime Litigation Wave: The D & O Diary has commented frequently (most recently here) on the wave of
litigation growing out of the subprime lending mess. The Washington Post has a September 11, 2007 article
entitled "Mortgage Mess Unleashes Chain of Lawsuits" (here) which sounds many of the same themes.
Among other tidbits in the article is the comment that the SEC has formed a working group to examine
"accounting and disclosure issues, as well as stock sales earlier this year by executives at companies that have
since been ensnared by the subprime mess." An official at the SEC enforcement division is quoted as saying "we
will look at those responsible for any potential fraud, by company management, auditors, lawyers, credit-rating
agencies or others."
You Can't Make This Stuff Up - But Plaintiffs' Lawyers Can!: This article appeared in Crain's Chicago
Business on September 10, 2007 (here) -- please note that in referring to this article I mean no disrespect to
http://www.dandodiary.com/articles/accountant-liability/[17-06-2011 22:03:15]
12. Accountant Liability : The D & O Diary
Mrs. Akkad, and I do not in any way mean to make light of her terrible loss. Mrs. Akkad has our deepest
sympathies. My inclusion of this article relates particularly to her lawyer's comments in the final two paragraphs
about her case:
The widow of a Hollywood producer who died in a Jordan terrorist bombing is suing hotel chain
Global Hyatt Corp.
A guest at the Hyatt in Amman, Jordan, Moustapha Akkad was killed Nov. 9, 2005, in an attack by
a suicide bomber, according to a statement from law firms representing his widow, Sooha Akkad.
The complaint alleges that Chicago-based Hyatt was negligent in failing to responsibly protect its
registered guests from foreseeable criminal attacks,
failing to provide metal detectors, and failing to keep unauthorized individuals from accessing the
inside of the hotel, according to the statement.
A spokeswoman for Hyatt declined to comment.
Hyatt should've had heightened security on the date Mr. Akkad was killed in part due to the date
itself, according to the statement. In the Middle East and in many countries, date precedes month
when writing out full dates, according to the statement.
"Thus, November 9 becomes 9/11," said Thomas Demetrio, a lawyer with Chicago-based law firm
Corboy & Demetrio.
Special thanks to a loyal reader for proving a link to this article.
TAGS: Accountant Liability
Comments Trackbacks Share Link
The Content and Timing of the PCAOB's Big Four Inspection
Reports
Posted on January 27, 2007 by Kevin LaCroix
The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) has been the target of extensive
criticism for the timing and content (or lack thereof) of the public reports for its inspections of the Big Four
accounting Firms. (Prior D & O Diary posts on this issue can be found here and here.) This issue is reviewed at
length in a January 26, 2007 CFO.com article entitled "Why The Big Four Are Still a Mystery" (here), and the
article is supplemented by an email interview (here) with PCAOB board member Charles Niemeier.
The article reviews the frequent criticisms that the public inspection reports reflect a "lack of context," because
the PCAOB does not publicly reveal how many inspections it conducts on each firm. Without this kind of
quantitative data, there is no way to assess how widespread the concerns are. The absence of this information
means that the inspection process "is not producing the kind of results that it should for people who are using
the results and trying to understand what this means," according to the former head of Deloitte, who is now the
chair of four public company audit committees, and who is quoted in the article.
The delay in reporting the results is also a concern. For example, the reports for the 2005 inspections of Ernst &
Young (here) and KPMG (here) were not released until January 2007. The audits inspected were obviously
completed substantially before the inspections. The delay gives analysts and others "little leeway in being able to
gauge the current performance of an audit firm."
Niemeier's response to the concern about the lack of disclosure concerning the number of audits inspected is
that it is "not a relevant figure" and "could encourage misleading, superficial comparisons between firms."
Niemeier also is opposed to supplying further details about the audit concerns noted in the inspection reports,
even information designed to convey how serious the problems noted were; Niemeier feels this would be
inconsistent with PCAOB's statutory confidentiality obligations.
http://www.dandodiary.com/articles/accountant-liability/[17-06-2011 22:03:15]
13. Accountant Liability : The D & O Diary
Niemeier is also opposed to any overall qualitative evaluation of the firms audited, on the theory that this would
"divert attention" from the PCAOB's efforts to identify risks in the audit firm's processes. With respect to the
timeliness of the inspection reports, Niemeier says that the "timing of the reports has been due to internal
operational processes" and that "the time between completion of an inspection and issuance of a report should
be shorter in the future."
What to make of all of this depends on the purpose of the PCAOB's public inspection reports. If, as with
Niemeier, you believe the public reports are designed to provide the audit firms with appropriate incentive to
remedy noted concerns, then the current process is adequate. But if that is the sole purpose, why bother with
public reports at all? Why not simply reserve public disclosure for those concerns the audit firms fail to address
during the 12-month cure period? But the reports clearly are made public (at least to the extent they are made
public) for a separate purpose, which is to inform. On that score, as the CFO.com article notes, the inspection
reports "don't paint a clear enough picture about what the auditor overseer was probably trying to say in its
reports."
Niemeier's comments that added information, such as the number of audits inspected, might be misued
amounts to an assertion that investors and others can't be trusted with the information. Clearly, the policy
decision to withhold the information is calculated for the audit firms' protection, to the detriment of the
investing public. These competing interests ought to militate that the PCAOB should go as far as it could to
disclose information consistent with its statutory constraints - and subject only to the statutory constraints. The
numerical and evaluative information critics argue that the inspection reports lack are not barred by the
statutory constraints. The audit firm's best protection against vulnerability to adverse information is in their
power to control, through their own audit execution.
A good summary of the shortcomings of the PCAOB's public inspection reports, with links to other sites, can be
found on the White Collar Fraud blog, here and here.
Audit Liability Caps: In a prior post (here), The D & O Diary took a look at various proposals to cap auditors'
liability. In a January 25, 2007 speech (reported here), Conrad Hewitt, the SEC's Chief Accountant, came out in
favor of protecting the "major accounting firms" from legal liability if their audit clients become embroiled in
accounting-related scandals. Hewitt is concerned about auditor liability because there are only four major
accounting firms left. "It's a concern to us if something should happen to any of the four firms."
So The D & O Diary wonders - is the PCAOB's policy on its public reports of the Big Four firm's audit
inspections the product of a similar concern for the survival of the "remaining four?"
TAGS: Accountant Liability, PCAOB
Comments Trackbacks Share Link
Looking at Auditor Liability Caps
Posted on January 20, 2007 by Kevin LaCroix
When the Committee on Capital Markets Regulation (popularly known as the Paulson
Committee) in its Interim Report (here) recommended "setting a cap on auditor liability," the Committee relied
for support on the steps in that direction that have been taken by the European Commission. In its latest effort
along those lines, the European Commission on January 18, 2007 launched a "public consultation on whether
there is a need to reform the rules on auditor liability in the EU." A copy of the Commission's press release can
be found here. A copy of the Staff Working Paper can be found here.
In the Working Paper, the Commission's staff offered four alternative proposals to cap the liability accounting
firms potentially face when auditing public companies. (The Commission is asking for comment on the four
proposals by March 15, 2007.) The four proposals are: a fixed monetary cap on damages that could be sought
from auditors; a cap based on the audited company's market capitalization; a cap based on a multiple of the
audit fees charged; or the introduction of proportionate liability , which would hold the auditor responsible only
for the damages that could be specifically attributed to them.
The initiative to afford accountants some form of liability protection is being led by Charlie McCreevy, the
http://www.dandodiary.com/articles/accountant-liability/[17-06-2011 22:03:15]
15. Accountant Liability : The D & O Diary
The D & O Diary PRIVACY POLICY DISCLAIMER
Kevin M. LaCroix
2000 Auburn Drive, Suite 200, Beachwood, OH 44122, Phone: (216) 378-7817
Directors and Officers Liability and Insurance commentary, The D & O
Diary, Kevin LaCroix of Oakbridge Insurance Services, offering services
relating to securities laws, class action lawsuits, subprime litigation,
options backdating, corporate fraud, D&O litigation, indemnity, Sarbanes-
Oxley, white collar crime.
DISCLAIMER:
The views expressed on this site are exclusively those of the author, and all of the content on this site has been created solely in the author's individual capacity. This site is
not affiliated with his company, his colleagues, his clients, his relatives or any other institution or person living, dead, or yet to exist. Quotations from this site should credit
The D & O Diary. However, this site may not be quoted in any legal brief or any other document to be filed with any Court unless the author has given his written consent
in advance. This blog does not intend to provide legal advice. You should consult your own attorney in connection with matters affecting your own legal interests.
http://www.dandodiary.com/articles/accountant-liability/[17-06-2011 22:03:15]