Case study Abdul Kashem vs Amirun Nahar and others.pptx
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
1 like•58 views
Abdul Kashem filed a petition seeking leave to appeal a High Court decision regarding a pre-emption case over land. The land was originally owned by Bazul Haque and was inherited by his daughter Amirun Nahar. Abdul Kashem purchased the land from Amirun Nahar. Amirun Nahar's predecessor, who was a co-sharer in the land, filed a pre-emption case claiming the sale was invalid since they were not notified. The key issue was whether the pre-emption case was barred by the statute of limitations. The courts below found that no notice was given to the pre-emptor, and the case was filed within four months of learning
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Sing Lian Express sdn bhd v Soh Kim Tee
The appellant gave the respondent an option to purchase land that was to be exercised within a stipulated period. The respondent exercised the option on time but the appellant refused to proceed. The respondent lodged a caveat on the land and filed a court case seeking specific performance or damages. The court granted an ex parte extension of the caveat. The appellant argued the extension was wrong and the respondent had no interest in the land. The court dismissed the appeal, finding the option was validly exercised so the respondent had a caveatable interest.
236974425 ltd-full-cases
homework help,online homework help,online tutors,online tutoring,research paper help,do my homework,
https://www.homeworkping.com/
Sultana safiana
This document is a court judgment regarding a civil revision petition filed to challenge a trial court's order rejecting the defendant's application to frame a preliminary issue in a civil suit. The trial court had refused to frame a preliminary issue on whether the suit was maintainable in view of there being no consideration for the alleged oral agreement between the parties as per Section 25 of the Contract Act. The High Court dismissed the revision petition, holding that the trial court was justified in finding that the issue of consideration involved mixed questions of law and fact that could not be decided in a preliminary issue. The High Court also held that the revision was not maintainable against an order refusing to frame a preliminary issue.
LAND LAW CASES
The document discusses four cases related to temporary occupation licenses (TOL) under Malaysian land law:
1) Mohamed v Kunji Mohidin - A holder of a TOL to pluck coconuts was awarded damages after another licensee cut down trees on the land.
2) Julaika Bivi v Mydin - A TOL holder can bring an ejectment action against a trespasser occupying part of a house on the licensed land.
3) Hee Cheng v Krishnan - An attempted sale of rights under a TOL was deemed unlawful under the Contracts Ordinance.
4) Paruvathy d/o Murugiah v Krishnan - The principle
Pp9
1) The plaintiff sought a declaration that a deed transferring land to the defendants be declared void, alleging it was obtained through fraud. The trial court ruled in the plaintiff's favor.
2) On appeal, the defendants argued the causes of action were misjoined. However, the court found the plaintiff only raised issues regarding invalidating the deed, not declaring title.
3) The court also held that even if both causes of action were raised, this would be allowed. Declaring a deed invalid is consequential to declaring title. The standard of proof in allegations of fraud is a balance of probabilities.
Wp 20189 1998
This order summarizes a writ petition seeking to direct respondents to appoint an arbitrator to determine rents and compensation for property requisitioned for military purposes in 1963. The property belonged to the petitioner's ancestors and included bungalows and land. While disputes over the land portion were resolved, the issues regarding rents and compensation for the bungalows remained undecided. The court allowed the petition and directed the respondents to appoint an arbitrator within 4 weeks as provided for under the relevant Act to resolve the outstanding matters relating to the building portions.
Execution of unexecuted or compromised decree
The document discusses the execution of compromised decrees under Indian law. It provides some key points:
1. Once a lawsuit or decree is compromised, the parties are barred from raising the same issue in court again or related issues from the same claim.
2. There are some exceptions where a compromised decree can still be executed - if the compromise was not properly recorded, if one party fulfilled their obligations but the other did not, or if there was a breach of the compromise agreement.
3. The validity of a consent decree depends on the validity of the compromise agreement it is based on. If a party can prove in court that there was no actual compromise, the court may reconsider the decree.
Pp13
1) The plaintiff sued the defendant tenant for ejectment from residential premises on the ground of reasonable requirement, after giving 6 months notice of termination. However, the Rent Act requires 1 year's notice for termination in such cases.
2) The District Court granted relief to the plaintiff but deferred the writ of possession by 6 months. The defendant appealed.
3) The Court of Appeal held that failure to give the required 1 year notice before filing the case disentitles the plaintiff from maintaining the action for ejectment under the Rent Act. Giving a shorter notice period renders the action futile.
Recommended
Sing Lian Express sdn bhd v Soh Kim Tee
The appellant gave the respondent an option to purchase land that was to be exercised within a stipulated period. The respondent exercised the option on time but the appellant refused to proceed. The respondent lodged a caveat on the land and filed a court case seeking specific performance or damages. The court granted an ex parte extension of the caveat. The appellant argued the extension was wrong and the respondent had no interest in the land. The court dismissed the appeal, finding the option was validly exercised so the respondent had a caveatable interest.
236974425 ltd-full-cases
homework help,online homework help,online tutors,online tutoring,research paper help,do my homework,
https://www.homeworkping.com/
Sultana safiana
This document is a court judgment regarding a civil revision petition filed to challenge a trial court's order rejecting the defendant's application to frame a preliminary issue in a civil suit. The trial court had refused to frame a preliminary issue on whether the suit was maintainable in view of there being no consideration for the alleged oral agreement between the parties as per Section 25 of the Contract Act. The High Court dismissed the revision petition, holding that the trial court was justified in finding that the issue of consideration involved mixed questions of law and fact that could not be decided in a preliminary issue. The High Court also held that the revision was not maintainable against an order refusing to frame a preliminary issue.
LAND LAW CASES
The document discusses four cases related to temporary occupation licenses (TOL) under Malaysian land law:
1) Mohamed v Kunji Mohidin - A holder of a TOL to pluck coconuts was awarded damages after another licensee cut down trees on the land.
2) Julaika Bivi v Mydin - A TOL holder can bring an ejectment action against a trespasser occupying part of a house on the licensed land.
3) Hee Cheng v Krishnan - An attempted sale of rights under a TOL was deemed unlawful under the Contracts Ordinance.
4) Paruvathy d/o Murugiah v Krishnan - The principle
Pp9
1) The plaintiff sought a declaration that a deed transferring land to the defendants be declared void, alleging it was obtained through fraud. The trial court ruled in the plaintiff's favor.
2) On appeal, the defendants argued the causes of action were misjoined. However, the court found the plaintiff only raised issues regarding invalidating the deed, not declaring title.
3) The court also held that even if both causes of action were raised, this would be allowed. Declaring a deed invalid is consequential to declaring title. The standard of proof in allegations of fraud is a balance of probabilities.
Wp 20189 1998
This order summarizes a writ petition seeking to direct respondents to appoint an arbitrator to determine rents and compensation for property requisitioned for military purposes in 1963. The property belonged to the petitioner's ancestors and included bungalows and land. While disputes over the land portion were resolved, the issues regarding rents and compensation for the bungalows remained undecided. The court allowed the petition and directed the respondents to appoint an arbitrator within 4 weeks as provided for under the relevant Act to resolve the outstanding matters relating to the building portions.
Execution of unexecuted or compromised decree
The document discusses the execution of compromised decrees under Indian law. It provides some key points:
1. Once a lawsuit or decree is compromised, the parties are barred from raising the same issue in court again or related issues from the same claim.
2. There are some exceptions where a compromised decree can still be executed - if the compromise was not properly recorded, if one party fulfilled their obligations but the other did not, or if there was a breach of the compromise agreement.
3. The validity of a consent decree depends on the validity of the compromise agreement it is based on. If a party can prove in court that there was no actual compromise, the court may reconsider the decree.
Pp13
1) The plaintiff sued the defendant tenant for ejectment from residential premises on the ground of reasonable requirement, after giving 6 months notice of termination. However, the Rent Act requires 1 year's notice for termination in such cases.
2) The District Court granted relief to the plaintiff but deferred the writ of possession by 6 months. The defendant appealed.
3) The Court of Appeal held that failure to give the required 1 year notice before filing the case disentitles the plaintiff from maintaining the action for ejectment under the Rent Act. Giving a shorter notice period renders the action futile.
cpc presentation case law of cpc main impo
This case concerns an appeal to set aside a property sale conducted by a court-appointed commissioner. The key facts are:
1) The appellant purchased the disputed property at a court auction for Rs. 12 lakhs.
2) One respondent filed an application to set aside the sale, claiming another party was willing to pay Rs. 18 lakhs. However, this alleged purchaser failed to appear in court on three occasions.
3) The High Court set aside the sale, finding inadequate notice and publicity of the sale.
4) The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and reinstated the sale. It found no requirement to publish newspaper notices and adequate publicity was given. Further, no
Pp12
This document summarizes a court case in Sri Lanka regarding the dismissal of a civil case.
The key details are:
1) The plaintiff filed a case seeking damages from the defendant. On a trial date, the plaintiff was present but his attorney was absent. The court refused the plaintiff's request for an adjournment and dismissed the case.
2) The plaintiff argued the dismissal was contrary to law and that the judge should have allowed the case to proceed instead of dismissing it.
3) The court found that since the plaintiff had an attorney, he could not represent himself or request an adjournment without the attorney present. The dismissal is therefore treated as an ex-parte order,
197772661 cases-21-33-ethics
homework help,online homework help,online tutors,online tutoring,research paper help,do my homework,
https://www.homeworkping.com/
Ppt 2
The document summarizes a court case from 1969 regarding a contract dispute over the sale of iron ore mining rights. Key points:
- In September 1957, the defendant offered to assign the plaintiffs lease rights to 184 acres of land for mining if they paid a certain amount within 3 months.
- The 3 months expired in November 1957 without the plaintiffs accepting the offer verbally or in writing.
- The defendant revoked the offer in a letter sent on October 31, 1957 but received by the plaintiffs on November 6, 1957.
- The court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit, finding that no contract was formed as the offer was still revocable when the defendant revoked it before the plaintiffs accepted. The letter of
case caltax oil v.hoi lai yoke
The plaintiffs sued the defendants for specific performance of a contract to purchase land. The court held that the agreement contained reciprocal promises by the plaintiffs and defendants to be performed simultaneously under section 52. The plaintiffs were ready and willing to pay upon the defendants producing documents of title, which they failed to do. Therefore, the plaintiffs were allowed specific performance and the defendants' argument that the plaintiffs defaulted on payment was rejected, as payment was not a condition precedent to the defendants' obligation to transfer the land.
Project-1.docx
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of Bangladesh judgment regarding a dispute over the sale of commercial property. The key details are:
1) The government put up abandoned commercial property for sale through a tender process. The respondents submitted the highest bid but failed to pay within the specified time period due to ongoing litigation.
2) After the litigation ended, the respondents requested to complete the sale but the government cancelled the contract, claiming the respondents failed to pay on time.
3) The High Court ruled in favor of the respondents and directed the government to complete the sale. The government appealed, arguing the writ petition was not maintainable and the contract ended due to non-payment.
4) The Supreme Court
Project-1.docx
Dear Sir/Madam! I am a professional steno-typist and computer operator. I am ready to do accurate and high quality typing and copy paste. Confident to deliver the best output as per your requirement. Therefore, please share the documents that you are willing to type. Kindly let me know your scheduled time. I am determined to complete your work ahead of schedule. So give me job with interest. Thank you very much.
Project-1.docx
Dear Sir/Madam! I am a professional steno-typist and computer operator. I am ready to do accurate and high quality typing and copy paste. Confident to deliver the best output as per your requirement. Therefore, please share the documents that you are willing to type. Kindly let me know your scheduled time. I am determined to complete your work ahead of schedule. So give me job with interest. Thank you very much.
116533240 oblicon-case-analysis
This document summarizes a legal case involving a disputed parcel of land. Key points:
- The land was originally owned by Candida Fernandez and passed to her heirs, including respondents, upon her death. However, the land was later forfeited for unpaid taxes.
- One of Fernandez's heirs, Vitaliano Aguirre, redeemed the land and it was agreed it would be held by him until partitioned among the heirs. Respondents later partitioned the land among themselves.
- Petitioners claimed the land was part of the public domain, while respondents argued they had possessory title through occupation since time immemorial.
- The trial court and appellate court both
Hema khattar vs. shiv khera (2017)
1) The case involved a dispute between a contractor (Appellant 1) and client (Respondent) regarding a construction project, as well as a subsequent oral agreement replacing Appellant 1 with Appellant 2 to oversee construction.
2) The Respondent filed to stay the civil suit under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act, arguing the disputes were subject to arbitration clauses in the written and oral agreements.
3) The Supreme Court ruled the appellants could jointly file the suit and it was not misjoinder. It also ruled the disputes must be referred to the sole arbitrator previously appointed, as per the arbitration clauses.
Ca phc 75_99_2
This document is a court ruling from the Court of Appeal of Sri Lanka regarding a land dispute case. It summarizes that the original ruling from the Provincial High Court set aside the magistrate's determination regarding the disputed land. However, the Court of Appeal found that the High Court's grounds for setting aside the determination were unsustainable. Specifically, the identity of the disputed land had been properly established and notices had been correctly posted. There was also evidence that a breach of peace had occurred. Therefore, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's judgment, and reinstated the magistrate's original order regarding the disputed land.
allahabad hc goondas act cost order.pdf
- The petitioner challenged a notice issued against him under the U.P. Goondas Act for allegedly threatening a Deputy Commissioner.
- The petitioner had a long running legal dispute with the state government over a property that was transferred to the petitioner in 1999 but remained occupied by the Trade Tax Department.
- After a series of court cases, the petitioner was found to be the lawful owner of the property and took possession in 2010. However, the district administration continued to object and interfere with the petitioner's use of the property.
- The instant petition sought to quash the Goondas Act notice, arguing it was a tactic to coerce the petitioner regarding the property and there was no basis for branding the petitioner a
Writing Sample
The document is a petition for writ of certiorari filed by the State of Florida (the petitioner) in the District Court of Appeal. The petition seeks review of a circuit court order denying the petitioner's request to strike a juror for cause and denying the petitioner's request to use remaining peremptory challenges. The petitioner asserts the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law by improperly denying for cause challenges and limiting the petitioner's use of peremptory challenges, thereby prejudicing jury selection. The petitioner requests the appellate court quash the circuit court's order and allow the petitioner to exercise remaining peremptory strikes to select a new jury.
Case study on law of banking
This case discusses three civil revision cases filed against an order by a subordinate judge regarding three suits filed by Ansarul Haque against Agrani Bank regarding fixed deposit receipts. The key points are:
1) Ansarul Haque argued the suits should be transferred as the receipts were actually checks, making order 37 of the CPC applicable for summary proceedings. However, the court found the receipts were not negotiable instruments like checks but rather fixed deposits.
2) As fixed deposits are not considered negotiable instruments, order 37 did not apply and the subordinate court had proper jurisdiction to hear the suits without transferring them.
3) Therefore, the court dismissed the revision cases, finding the subordinate
Pp77
(1) The plaintiff filed an action seeking a declaration to close a road on her land that the defendants had been using, claiming it was only with her father's permission. She argued the defendants had an alternate access route.
(2) The trial court dismissed the plaintiff's action. On appeal, the Court of Appeal found that the trial court erred in its judgment, as there was no evidence the defendants had acquired prescriptive rights over the road after 50 years of use, or that they had rights of way out of necessity.
(3) The Court of Appeal concluded the trial court should have found in favor of the plaintiff and granted a declaration allowing her to close the road, since the defendants' use
FORDHAM #2 of 3; Fordham v Dewsash PL t.as SP&W.Hobson [2012] NSWDC 109
This document summarizes a District Court appeal from a decision of the Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal regarding a building dispute. The Tribunal found that there was an agreement for the plaintiff to pay $36,000 upon completion of the slab, but the District Court found there was no evidence to support this finding. The District Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal's orders, and remitted the matter to the Tribunal for a rehearing in accordance with the District Court's reasons.
SC Interim Bail to Teesta Setalvad_Order_02-Sep-2022 (1).pdf
The Supreme Court of India granted interim bail to Teesta Setalvad who had been in judicial custody since June 2022 regarding charges related to fabricating evidence in the 2002 Gujarat riots cases. While not examining the merits of the case, the Court noted that Setalvad had been in custody for over 2 months, essential investigation was complete, and the offenses dated back to 2002. It directed that she be released on interim bail on furnishing a cash bond or surety until the High Court considers her regular bail application. The Court clarified this should not be seen as a reflection on the case merits.
SC Interim Bail to Teesta Setalvad_Order_02-Sep-2022.pdf
The Supreme Court of India granted interim bail to Teesta Setalvad, who had been in judicial custody since June 2022 regarding charges related to fabrication of evidence in a 2002 riot case. While not assessing the merits of the case, the Court noted that essential investigation was complete, her custody was not needed during the pending High Court proceedings, and interim bail was justified given she had been in custody for over 2 months as a female accused. However, conditions were imposed including surrendering her passport until the High Court considers the matter.
DOC-20221127-WA0000..pptx
The plaintiff filed a suit for partition of land claiming ownership over specific plots based on inheritance from family members. The defendant contested the suit claiming ownership over portions of the land. The key issues were the validity of an unregistered 1948 deed transferring land to the defendant, whether the plaintiff was the owner as claimed, and whether the plaintiff was entitled to the requested reliefs. Both lower courts ruled in favor of the defendant, finding the 1948 deed valid based on its age. The plaintiff appealed alleging errors in the lower courts' application of law regarding unregistered deeds and burden of proof.
Internship diary by ronak
The document summarizes the internship diary of Ronak Karanpuria during their internship at the Supreme Court of India under Justice Dipak Misra. Over the course of 6 days, the intern observed court proceedings, conducted legal research, and worked on case studies. Some of the key cases discussed include appeals related to land disputes, criminal convictions, and employee benefits. The intern gained experience in legal research, analyzing facts and issues in cases, and summarizing judicial decisions.
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional and judicial approach
More Related Content
Similar to Case study Abdul Kashem vs Amirun Nahar and others.pptx
cpc presentation case law of cpc main impo
This case concerns an appeal to set aside a property sale conducted by a court-appointed commissioner. The key facts are:
1) The appellant purchased the disputed property at a court auction for Rs. 12 lakhs.
2) One respondent filed an application to set aside the sale, claiming another party was willing to pay Rs. 18 lakhs. However, this alleged purchaser failed to appear in court on three occasions.
3) The High Court set aside the sale, finding inadequate notice and publicity of the sale.
4) The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and reinstated the sale. It found no requirement to publish newspaper notices and adequate publicity was given. Further, no
Pp12
This document summarizes a court case in Sri Lanka regarding the dismissal of a civil case.
The key details are:
1) The plaintiff filed a case seeking damages from the defendant. On a trial date, the plaintiff was present but his attorney was absent. The court refused the plaintiff's request for an adjournment and dismissed the case.
2) The plaintiff argued the dismissal was contrary to law and that the judge should have allowed the case to proceed instead of dismissing it.
3) The court found that since the plaintiff had an attorney, he could not represent himself or request an adjournment without the attorney present. The dismissal is therefore treated as an ex-parte order,
197772661 cases-21-33-ethics
homework help,online homework help,online tutors,online tutoring,research paper help,do my homework,
https://www.homeworkping.com/
Ppt 2
The document summarizes a court case from 1969 regarding a contract dispute over the sale of iron ore mining rights. Key points:
- In September 1957, the defendant offered to assign the plaintiffs lease rights to 184 acres of land for mining if they paid a certain amount within 3 months.
- The 3 months expired in November 1957 without the plaintiffs accepting the offer verbally or in writing.
- The defendant revoked the offer in a letter sent on October 31, 1957 but received by the plaintiffs on November 6, 1957.
- The court dismissed the plaintiffs' suit, finding that no contract was formed as the offer was still revocable when the defendant revoked it before the plaintiffs accepted. The letter of
case caltax oil v.hoi lai yoke
The plaintiffs sued the defendants for specific performance of a contract to purchase land. The court held that the agreement contained reciprocal promises by the plaintiffs and defendants to be performed simultaneously under section 52. The plaintiffs were ready and willing to pay upon the defendants producing documents of title, which they failed to do. Therefore, the plaintiffs were allowed specific performance and the defendants' argument that the plaintiffs defaulted on payment was rejected, as payment was not a condition precedent to the defendants' obligation to transfer the land.
Project-1.docx
This document summarizes a Supreme Court of Bangladesh judgment regarding a dispute over the sale of commercial property. The key details are:
1) The government put up abandoned commercial property for sale through a tender process. The respondents submitted the highest bid but failed to pay within the specified time period due to ongoing litigation.
2) After the litigation ended, the respondents requested to complete the sale but the government cancelled the contract, claiming the respondents failed to pay on time.
3) The High Court ruled in favor of the respondents and directed the government to complete the sale. The government appealed, arguing the writ petition was not maintainable and the contract ended due to non-payment.
4) The Supreme Court
Project-1.docx
Dear Sir/Madam! I am a professional steno-typist and computer operator. I am ready to do accurate and high quality typing and copy paste. Confident to deliver the best output as per your requirement. Therefore, please share the documents that you are willing to type. Kindly let me know your scheduled time. I am determined to complete your work ahead of schedule. So give me job with interest. Thank you very much.
Project-1.docx
Dear Sir/Madam! I am a professional steno-typist and computer operator. I am ready to do accurate and high quality typing and copy paste. Confident to deliver the best output as per your requirement. Therefore, please share the documents that you are willing to type. Kindly let me know your scheduled time. I am determined to complete your work ahead of schedule. So give me job with interest. Thank you very much.
116533240 oblicon-case-analysis
This document summarizes a legal case involving a disputed parcel of land. Key points:
- The land was originally owned by Candida Fernandez and passed to her heirs, including respondents, upon her death. However, the land was later forfeited for unpaid taxes.
- One of Fernandez's heirs, Vitaliano Aguirre, redeemed the land and it was agreed it would be held by him until partitioned among the heirs. Respondents later partitioned the land among themselves.
- Petitioners claimed the land was part of the public domain, while respondents argued they had possessory title through occupation since time immemorial.
- The trial court and appellate court both
Hema khattar vs. shiv khera (2017)
1) The case involved a dispute between a contractor (Appellant 1) and client (Respondent) regarding a construction project, as well as a subsequent oral agreement replacing Appellant 1 with Appellant 2 to oversee construction.
2) The Respondent filed to stay the civil suit under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act, arguing the disputes were subject to arbitration clauses in the written and oral agreements.
3) The Supreme Court ruled the appellants could jointly file the suit and it was not misjoinder. It also ruled the disputes must be referred to the sole arbitrator previously appointed, as per the arbitration clauses.
Ca phc 75_99_2
This document is a court ruling from the Court of Appeal of Sri Lanka regarding a land dispute case. It summarizes that the original ruling from the Provincial High Court set aside the magistrate's determination regarding the disputed land. However, the Court of Appeal found that the High Court's grounds for setting aside the determination were unsustainable. Specifically, the identity of the disputed land had been properly established and notices had been correctly posted. There was also evidence that a breach of peace had occurred. Therefore, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, set aside the High Court's judgment, and reinstated the magistrate's original order regarding the disputed land.
allahabad hc goondas act cost order.pdf
- The petitioner challenged a notice issued against him under the U.P. Goondas Act for allegedly threatening a Deputy Commissioner.
- The petitioner had a long running legal dispute with the state government over a property that was transferred to the petitioner in 1999 but remained occupied by the Trade Tax Department.
- After a series of court cases, the petitioner was found to be the lawful owner of the property and took possession in 2010. However, the district administration continued to object and interfere with the petitioner's use of the property.
- The instant petition sought to quash the Goondas Act notice, arguing it was a tactic to coerce the petitioner regarding the property and there was no basis for branding the petitioner a
Writing Sample
The document is a petition for writ of certiorari filed by the State of Florida (the petitioner) in the District Court of Appeal. The petition seeks review of a circuit court order denying the petitioner's request to strike a juror for cause and denying the petitioner's request to use remaining peremptory challenges. The petitioner asserts the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law by improperly denying for cause challenges and limiting the petitioner's use of peremptory challenges, thereby prejudicing jury selection. The petitioner requests the appellate court quash the circuit court's order and allow the petitioner to exercise remaining peremptory strikes to select a new jury.
Case study on law of banking
This case discusses three civil revision cases filed against an order by a subordinate judge regarding three suits filed by Ansarul Haque against Agrani Bank regarding fixed deposit receipts. The key points are:
1) Ansarul Haque argued the suits should be transferred as the receipts were actually checks, making order 37 of the CPC applicable for summary proceedings. However, the court found the receipts were not negotiable instruments like checks but rather fixed deposits.
2) As fixed deposits are not considered negotiable instruments, order 37 did not apply and the subordinate court had proper jurisdiction to hear the suits without transferring them.
3) Therefore, the court dismissed the revision cases, finding the subordinate
Pp77
(1) The plaintiff filed an action seeking a declaration to close a road on her land that the defendants had been using, claiming it was only with her father's permission. She argued the defendants had an alternate access route.
(2) The trial court dismissed the plaintiff's action. On appeal, the Court of Appeal found that the trial court erred in its judgment, as there was no evidence the defendants had acquired prescriptive rights over the road after 50 years of use, or that they had rights of way out of necessity.
(3) The Court of Appeal concluded the trial court should have found in favor of the plaintiff and granted a declaration allowing her to close the road, since the defendants' use
FORDHAM #2 of 3; Fordham v Dewsash PL t.as SP&W.Hobson [2012] NSWDC 109
This document summarizes a District Court appeal from a decision of the Consumer, Trader and Tenancy Tribunal regarding a building dispute. The Tribunal found that there was an agreement for the plaintiff to pay $36,000 upon completion of the slab, but the District Court found there was no evidence to support this finding. The District Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal's orders, and remitted the matter to the Tribunal for a rehearing in accordance with the District Court's reasons.
SC Interim Bail to Teesta Setalvad_Order_02-Sep-2022 (1).pdf
The Supreme Court of India granted interim bail to Teesta Setalvad who had been in judicial custody since June 2022 regarding charges related to fabricating evidence in the 2002 Gujarat riots cases. While not examining the merits of the case, the Court noted that Setalvad had been in custody for over 2 months, essential investigation was complete, and the offenses dated back to 2002. It directed that she be released on interim bail on furnishing a cash bond or surety until the High Court considers her regular bail application. The Court clarified this should not be seen as a reflection on the case merits.
SC Interim Bail to Teesta Setalvad_Order_02-Sep-2022.pdf
The Supreme Court of India granted interim bail to Teesta Setalvad, who had been in judicial custody since June 2022 regarding charges related to fabrication of evidence in a 2002 riot case. While not assessing the merits of the case, the Court noted that essential investigation was complete, her custody was not needed during the pending High Court proceedings, and interim bail was justified given she had been in custody for over 2 months as a female accused. However, conditions were imposed including surrendering her passport until the High Court considers the matter.
DOC-20221127-WA0000..pptx
The plaintiff filed a suit for partition of land claiming ownership over specific plots based on inheritance from family members. The defendant contested the suit claiming ownership over portions of the land. The key issues were the validity of an unregistered 1948 deed transferring land to the defendant, whether the plaintiff was the owner as claimed, and whether the plaintiff was entitled to the requested reliefs. Both lower courts ruled in favor of the defendant, finding the 1948 deed valid based on its age. The plaintiff appealed alleging errors in the lower courts' application of law regarding unregistered deeds and burden of proof.
Internship diary by ronak
The document summarizes the internship diary of Ronak Karanpuria during their internship at the Supreme Court of India under Justice Dipak Misra. Over the course of 6 days, the intern observed court proceedings, conducted legal research, and worked on case studies. Some of the key cases discussed include appeals related to land disputes, criminal convictions, and employee benefits. The intern gained experience in legal research, analyzing facts and issues in cases, and summarizing judicial decisions.
Similar to Case study Abdul Kashem vs Amirun Nahar and others.pptx (20)
FORDHAM #2 of 3; Fordham v Dewsash PL t.as SP&W.Hobson [2012] NSWDC 109
FORDHAM #2 of 3; Fordham v Dewsash PL t.as SP&W.Hobson [2012] NSWDC 109
SC Interim Bail to Teesta Setalvad_Order_02-Sep-2022 (1).pdf
SC Interim Bail to Teesta Setalvad_Order_02-Sep-2022 (1).pdf
SC Interim Bail to Teesta Setalvad_Order_02-Sep-2022.pdf
SC Interim Bail to Teesta Setalvad_Order_02-Sep-2022.pdf
Recently uploaded
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने यह भी माना था कि मजिस्ट्रेट का यह कर्तव्य है कि वह सुनिश्चित करे कि अधिकारी पीएमएलए के तहत निर्धारित प्रक्रिया के साथ-साथ संवैधानिक सुरक्षा उपायों का भी उचित रूप से पालन करें।
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional and judicial approach
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
असंगत न्यायालयी फैसलों के कारण भारत में महिलाओं को सुरक्षित गर्भपात के लिए एक भ्रामक और अनुचित कानूनी लड़ाई का सामना करना पड़ रहा है।
原版制作(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(PSU毕业证书)宾州州立大学公园分校毕业证学历证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Incometax Compliance_PF_ ESI- June 2024
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Pim Betist's presentation about generative AI in the legal sector at Lexpo.com '24
Search Warrants for NH Law Enforcement Officers
Training aid for law enforcement officers related to search warrants, the requirements needed, drafting, and execution of the search warrant.
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...Syed Muhammad Humza Hussain
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordinary And Special Businesses And Ordinary And Special Resolutions with Companies (Postal Ballot) Regulations, 2018What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
The legal profession, which has historically been male-dominated, has experienced a significant increase in the number of women entering the field over the past few decades. Despite this progress, women lawyers continue to encounter various challenges as they strive for top positions.
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
This guide aims to provide information on how lawyers will be able to use the opportunities provided by AI tools and how such tools could help the business processes of small firms. Its objective is to provide lawyers with some background to understand what they can and cannot realistically expect from these products. This guide aims to give a reference point for small law practices in the EU
against which they can evaluate those classes of AI applications that are probably the most relevant for them.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Discover how Mississauga criminal defence lawyers defend clients facing weapon offence charges with expert legal guidance and courtroom representation.
To know more visit: https://www.saini-law.com/
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
slide deck : Patenting innovations in 3D printing
一比一原版(Lincoln毕业证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证如何办理
Lincoln硕士毕业证成绩单【微信95270640】办理新西兰林肯大学毕业证原版一模一样、Lincoln毕业证制作【Q微信95270640】《新西兰林肯大学毕业证购买流程》《Lincoln成绩单制作》新西兰林肯大学毕业证书Lincoln毕业证文凭新西兰林肯大学
本科毕业证书,学历学位认证如何办理【留学国外学位学历认证、毕业证、成绩单、大学Offer、雅思托福代考、语言证书、学生卡、高仿教育部认证等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务】代办国外（海外）英国、加拿大、美国、新西兰、澳大利亚、新西兰等国外各大学毕业证、文凭学历证书、成绩单、学历学位认证真实可查。
[留学文凭学历认证(留信认证使馆认证)新西兰林肯大学毕业证成绩单毕业证证书大学Offer请假条成绩单语言证书国际回国人员证明高仿教育部认证申请学校等一切高仿或者真实可查认证服务。
多年留学服务公司,拥有海外样板无数能完美1:1还原海外各国大学degreeDiplomaTranscripts等毕业材料。海外大学毕业材料都有哪些工艺呢？工艺难度主要由：烫金.钢印.底纹.水印.防伪光标.热敏防伪等等组成。而且我们每天都在更新海外文凭的样板以求所有同学都能享受到完美的品质服务。
国外毕业证学位证成绩单办理方法：
1客户提供办理新西兰林肯大学新西兰林肯大学毕业证学位证信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：我们有专业老师帮你查询）；
2开始安排制作毕业证成绩单电子图；
3毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快读邮寄）
— — — — 我们是挂科和未毕业同学们的福音我们是实体公司精益求精的工艺！ — — — -
一真实留信认证的作用(私企外企荣誉的见证):
1：该专业认证可证明留学生真实留学身份同时对留学生所学专业等级给予评定。
2：国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书这个入网证书并且可以归档到地方。
3：凡是获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内将在公安部网内查询个人身份证信息后同步读取人才网入库信息。
4：个人职称评审加20分个人信誉贷款加10分。
5：在国家人才网主办的全国网络招聘大会中纳入资料供国家500强等高端企业选择人才。问山娃想买什么想吃什么山娃知道父亲赚钱很辛苦除了书籍和文具山娃啥也不要能牵着父亲的手满城闲逛他已心满意足了父亲连挑了三套童装叫山娃试穿山娃有点不想父亲说城里不比乡下要穿得漂漂亮亮爸怎么不穿得漂亮望着父亲山娃反问道父亲听了并不回答只是吃吃地笑山娃很精神越逛越起劲父亲却越逛越疲倦望着父亲呵欠连天的样子山娃也说困了累了回家吧小屋闷罐一般头顶上的三叶扇彻夜呜呜作响搅得满屋热气腾腾也搅得山娃心烦意乱父亲一的
在线办理(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(SU毕业证书)美国雪城大学毕业证成绩单》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
Learn more on how to obtain the work permit for self-employed persons in Italy at https://immigration-italy.com/selfemployment-work-permit-in-italy/.
Recently uploaded (20)
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
V.-SENTHIL-BALAJI-SLP-C-8939-8940-2023-SC-Judgment-07-August-2023.pdf
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Presentation (1).pptx Human rights of LGBTQ people in India, constitutional a...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
XYZ-v.-state-of-Maharashtra-Bombay-HC-Writ-Petition-6340-2023.pdf
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
From Promise to Practice. Implementing AI in Legal Environments
Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem
Tax Law Notes on taxation law tax law for 10th sem
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
Synopsis On Annual General Meeting/Extra Ordinary General Meeting With Ordina...
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
What are the common challenges faced by women lawyers working in the legal pr...
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
Guide on the use of Artificial Intelligence-based tools by lawyers and law fi...
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government Liaison
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Defending Weapons Offence Charges: Role of Mississauga Criminal Defence Lawyers
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentation
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
Patenting_Innovations_in_3D_Printing_Prosthetics.pptx
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
The Work Permit for Self-Employed Persons in Italy
Case study Abdul Kashem vs Amirun Nahar and others.pptx
- 1. Abdul Kashem vs Amirun Nahar and others Presenting by, Nasim Uddin Id no: 16/22/59/1923 Student Department of Law World University of Bangladesh
- 2. Supreme Court of Bangladesh 11 BLC (AD) 147(2006)
- 3. Fact: The predecessor of the deceased pre-emptor Amirun Nahar is co-sharer by inheritance from her father Bazul Haque, one of the recorded co-sharers, and that the pre-emptee petitioner is a stranger purchaser and that without serving any notice the property has been sold to the said pre- emptee. The pre-emptor coming to know of the transfer filed the case on 30 November 1971. The trial Court allowed the pre-emption in favour of the pre-emptor.
- 4. The pre-emptee petitioner preferred Miscellaneous Appeal No. 177 of 1977 which was dismissed in 1988. The pre-emptee-petitioner Abul Kashem seeks leave to appeal against the judgment dated 27th August 2002 passed by a Single Bench of the High Court Division in Civil Revision No. 4924 of 1991 discharging the Rule.
- 5. Issue: Whether the Miscellaneous Case for pre-emption was barred by limitation or not?
- 6. Rule of Law: Section 96 of The State Acquisition And Tenancy Act, 1950
- 7. Application of Law: Argument in favor of the appellants: The case land being transferred on 29th March 1972 the Misc. case for preemption was barred by limitation.
- 8. Argument in favor of the respondents: •No notice was served upon the pre-emptor regarding the sale in question and that later after coming to know of the transfer he instituted the case with in four months of the date of his knowledge and adduced evidence in support of his contention.
- 9. Conclusion(Judgement) It was held that in the courts below the point of limitation was not urged even no such ground was taken in leave petition. Any ground not canvassed before the courts below cannot be raised before the Appellate Division. In view of the discussion made above, the petition is found to be without merit. The petition is, therefore, dismissed.
- 10. That’s all my presentation. Thank you for your patience.