A mitchell eng
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•257 views
The document summarizes an ENPI FLEG Regional Conference that took place in Chisinau, Moldova in July 2010. The conference brought together 12 countries in Eastern Europe and Central Asia to discuss ongoing efforts to improve forest law enforcement and governance through pilot projects implemented by the World Bank, WWF, and IUCN. The overall objective is to contribute to sustainable forest management practices, strengthened rule of law, and improved livelihoods with a focus on environmental sustainability, human rights, and gender equity. Progress to date includes substantive analysis, communications activities, workshops, and surveys to assess needs and increase awareness, commitment, and regional collaboration on these issues.
More Related Content
Similar to A mitchell eng
Similar to A mitchell eng (20)
More from ENPI FLEG
More from ENPI FLEG (20)
A mitchell eng
- 1. ENPI FLEG Regional Conference Andrew M Mitchell World Bank Chisinau July 13 - 14 2010
- 2. Background 2 St Petersburg ENA FLEG conference 2005 Continuing dialogue EC – Improving Forest Law Enforcement and Governance in the ENPI East Countries and Russia (2008-2011)
- 4. Azerbaijan
- 5. Belarus
- 6. Georgia
- 10. Kyrgyz Republic
- 11. Tajikistan
- 12. Turkmenistan
- 13. Uzbekistan
- 16. a strengthened rule of law, and
- 18. 7 PROGRESS Implementing Organizations World Bank, WWF and IUCN PMT and PCTs NPACs and JCT First year’s activities underway/ completed
- 19. 8 PROGRESS Examples: Substantive analysis Communications Website Newsletters Workshops and other fora Surveys Processes
- 21. 10
- 22. 11
- 23. 12 Expected PROGRAM RESULTS Increased awareness and commitment Effective national and regional FLEG action processes in place National ownership and capacity increased Improved regional collaboration Engagement of key trading partners Continuation of the official ENA-FLEG process SFM practices being implemented
- 24. Thank You! 13
Editor's Notes
- Without a clear vision of what is to be achieved and a monitorable road map for the way forward, there will be no way of assessing in future, if the reforms have been successful. Arguably, the success of institutional reforms should be judged by the extent to which overall sectoral performance is improved – better forest management, greater investment and job creation in the industry, stronger financial performance of both private and public institutions, better environmental protection, improved protected area management, and some greater benefit for civil society resulting from better forest management. More clearly articulating the vision, now, for how to go about achieving these outcomes, and developing a broader base of support amongst all key stakeholders for a reform process would greatly help to clarify the way ahead.
- Without a clear vision of what is to be achieved and a monitorable road map for the way forward, there will be no way of assessing in future, if the reforms have been successful. Arguably, the success of institutional reforms should be judged by the extent to which overall sectoral performance is improved – better forest management, greater investment and job creation in the industry, stronger financial performance of both private and public institutions, better environmental protection, improved protected area management, and some greater benefit for civil society resulting from better forest management. More clearly articulating the vision, now, for how to go about achieving these outcomes, and developing a broader base of support amongst all key stakeholders for a reform process would greatly help to clarify the way ahead.