6/7/2020 https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/CIS/498/1148/Week10/Week 10 Final Project Grading Rubric.html https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/CIS/498/1148/Week10/Week 10 Final Project Grading Rubric.html 1/2 Points: 300 Final Project: Project Plan Criteria Unacceptable Below 60% F Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A Section 1: Written Project Plan 1a. Describe the scope of the project and control measures. Weight: 5% Did not submit or incompletely described the scope of the project and control measures. Insufficiently described the scope of the project and control measures. Partially described the scope of the project and control measures. Satisfactorily described the scope of the project and control measures. Thoroughly described the scope of the project and control measures. 1b. Describe the goals and objectives of the project. Weight: 5% Did not submit or incompletely described the goals and objectives of the project. Insufficiently described the goals and objectives of the project. Partially described the goals and objectives of the project. Satisfactorily described the goals and objectives of the project. Thoroughly described the goals and objectives of the project. 1c. Give a detailed, realistically estimated cost analysis of the entire project. Weight: 10% Did not submit or incompletely gave a detailed, realistically estimated cost analysis of the entire project. Insufficiently gave a detailed, realistically estimated cost analysis of the entire project. Partially gave a detailed, realistically estimated cost analysis of the entire project. Satisfactorily gave a detailed, realistically estimated cost analysis of the entire project. Thoroughly gave a detailed, realistically estimated cost analysis of the entire project. 1d. Relate the value of the project plan solution to the competitive advantage that information technology will afford your organization. Weight: 10% Did not submit or incompletely related the value of the project plan solution to the competitive advantage that information technology will afford your organization. Insufficiently related the value of the project plan solution to the competitive advantage that information technology will afford your organization. Partially related the value of the project plan solution to the competitive advantage that information technology will afford your organization. Satisfactorily related the value of the project plan solution to the competitive advantage that information technology will afford your organization. Thoroughly related the value of the project plan solution to the competitive advantage that information technology will afford your organization. 1e. Provide all aspects of the information technology implementation into the project plan. Weight: 5% Did not submit or incompletely provided all aspects of the information technology implementation.

1. 6/7/2020
https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/CIS/498/1
148/Week10/Week 10 Final Project Grading Rubric.html
https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/CIS/498/1
148/Week10/Week 10 Final Project Grading Rubric.html 1/2
Points: 300 Final Project: Project Plan
Criteria
Unacceptable
Below 60% F
Meets
Minimum
Expectations
60-69% D
Fair
70-79% C
Proficient
80-89% B

2. Exemplary
90-100% A
Section 1: Written Project Plan
1a. Describe the
scope of the
project and control
measures.
Weight: 5%
Did not submit or
incompletely
described the
scope of the
project and
control
measures.
Insufficiently
described the
scope of the
project and
control
measures.
Partially
described the
scope of the
project and
control
measures.
Satisfactorily
described the

3. scope of the
project and
control
measures.
Thoroughly
described the
scope of the
project and
control
measures.
1b. Describe the
goals and
objectives of the
project.
Weight: 5%
Did not submit or
incompletely
described the
goals and
objectives of the
project.
Insufficiently
described the
goals and
objectives of the
project.
Partially
described the
goals and
objectives of the
project.

4. Satisfactorily
described the
goals and
objectives of
the project.
Thoroughly
described the
goals and
objectives of the
project.
1c. Give a
detailed,
realistically
estimated cost
analysis of the
entire project.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or
incompletely
gave a detailed,
realistically
estimated cost
analysis of the
entire project.
Insufficiently
gave a detailed,
realistically
estimated cost
analysis of the
entire project.

5. Partially gave a
detailed,
realistically
estimated cost
analysis of the
entire project.
Satisfactorily
gave a detailed,
realistically
estimated cost
analysis of the
entire project.
Thoroughly
gave a detailed,
realistically
estimated cost
analysis of the
entire project.
1d. Relate the
value of the
project plan
solution to the
competitive
advantage that
information
technology will
afford your
organization.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or
incompletely
related the value

6. of the project
plan solution to
the competitive
advantage that
information
technology will
afford your
organization.
Insufficiently
related the
value of the
project plan
solution to the
competitive
advantage that
information
technology will
afford your
organization.
Partially related
the value of the
project plan
solution to the
competitive
advantage that
information
technology will
afford your
organization.
Satisfactorily
related the
value of the
project plan

7. solution to the
competitive
advantage that
information
technology will
afford your
organization.
Thoroughly
related the
value of the
project plan
solution to the
competitive
advantage that
information
technology will
afford your
organization.
1e. Provide all
aspects of the
information
technology
implementation
into the project
plan.
Weight: 5%
Did not submit or
incompletely
provided all
aspects of the
information
technology
implementation

8. into the project
plan.
Insufficiently
provided all
aspects of the
information
technology
implementation
into the project
plan.
Partially
provided all
aspects of the
information
technology
implementation
into the project
plan.
Satisfactorily
provided all
aspects of the
information
technology
implementation
into the project
plan.
Thoroughly
provided all
aspects of the
information
technology
implementation

9. into the project
plan.
1f. 5 references
Weight: 5%
No references
provided
Does not meet
the required
number of
references; all
references poor
quality choices.
Does not meet
the required
number of
references;
some
references poor
quality choices.
Meets number
of required
references; all
references high
quality choices.
Exceeds
number of
required
references; all
references high
quality choices.

10. Section 2: Revised Gantt Chart / Project Plan
2. Update the
Gantt chart or
project plan
(summary and
detail) template,
from Project
Deliverable 4:
Did not submit or
incompletely
updated the
Gantt chart or
project plan
(summary and
detail) template,
Insufficiently
updated the
Gantt chart or
project plan
(summary and
detail) template,
from Project
Partially
updated the
Gantt chart or
project plan
(summary and
detail) template,
from Project
Satisfactorily
updated the

11. Gantt chart or
project plan
(summary and
detail) template,
from Project
Thoroughly
updated the
Gantt chart or
project plan
(summary and
detail) template,
from Project
6/7/2020
https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/CIS/498/1
148/Week10/Week 10 Final Project Grading Rubric.html
https://blackboard.strayer.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/CIS/498/1
148/Week10/Week 10 Final Project Grading Rubric.html 2/2
Infrastructure and
Security, with all
the project tasks.
Weight: 15%
from Project
Deliverable 4:
Infrastructure and
Security, with all
the project tasks.
Deliverable 4:
Infrastructure

12. and Security,
with all the
project tasks.
Deliverable 4:
Infrastructure
and Security,
with all the
project tasks.
Deliverable 4:
Infrastructure
and Security,
with all the
project tasks.
Deliverable 4:
Infrastructure
and Security,
with all the
project tasks.
Section 3: Project Plan PowerPoint Presentation
3a. Illustrate the
concepts from
your written report
in Section 1 of this
assignment.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or
incompletely
illustrated the
concepts from
your written
report in Section

13. 1 of this
assignment.
Insufficiently
illustrated the
concepts from
your written
report in Section
1 of this
assignment.
Partially
illustrated the
concepts from
your written
report in Section
1 of this
assignment.
Satisfactorily
illustrated the
concepts from
your written
report in
Section 1 of this
assignment.
Thoroughly
illustrated the
concepts from
your written
report in Section
1 of this
assignment.
3b. Create

14. bulleted speaking
notes for your
presentation to the
executive board in
the Notes section
of the PowerPoint.
Weight: 15%
Did not submit or
incompletely
created bulleted
speaking notes
for your
presentation to
the executive
board in the
Notes section of
the PowerPoint.
Insufficiently
created bulleted
speaking notes
for your
presentation to
the executive
board in the
Notes section of
the PowerPoint.
Partially created
bulleted
speaking notes
for your
presentation to
the executive
board in the

15. Notes section of
the PowerPoint.
Satisfactorily
created bulleted
speaking notes
for your
presentation to
the executive
board in the
Notes section of
the PowerPoint.
Thoroughly
created bulleted
speaking notes
for your
presentation to
the executive
board in the
Notes section of
the PowerPoint.
3c. Use a
professional
technically written
style to graphically
convey the
information.
Weight: 10%
Did not submit or
incompletely
used a
professional
technically

16. written style to
graphically
convey the
information.
Insufficiently
used a
professional
technically
written style to
graphically
convey the
information.
Partially used a
professional
technically
written style to
graphically
convey the
information.
Satisfactorily
used a
professional
technically
written style to
graphically
convey the
information.
Thoroughly
used a
professional
technically
written style to

17. graphically
convey the
information.
4. Clarity, writing
mechanics, and
formatting
requirements
Weight: 10%
More than 8
errors present
7-8 errors
present
5-6 errors
present
3-4 errors
present
0-2 errors
present
Sheet2Product Video Camera - BlueSum of ReturnsColumn
LabelsRow LabelsChicagoLAPhoenixGrand
Total1Q/20157762112869696287442Q/20155740116401187629
2563Q/2015319161664830049786134Q/20157450038022438471
56369Grand Total1199187759695468292982
Sheet1Product CityMonth-YearSales
PersonRevenueReturnsVideo Camera -
BluePhoenix1Q/2015Jim$100,000$3,423Video Camera -
BluePhoenix1Q/2015Mary$85,000$1,425Video Camera -
GreenPhoenix1Q/2015Ron$150,000$0Video Camera -

18. BlueLA1Q/2015Fred$100,000$4,885Video Camera -
BlueLA1Q/2015Jayn$85,000$758Video Camera -
GreenLA1Q/2015Bruce$150,000$0Video Camera -
BlueChicago1Q/2015Tim$100,000$1,423Video Camera -
BlueChicago1Q/2015Wayne$85,000$2,458Video Camera -
GreenChicago1Q/2015Cindy$150,000$0Video Camera -
BluePhoenix1Q/2015Amy$259,874$3,423Video Camera -
BluePhoenix1Q/2015Scott$96,000$1,425Video Camera -
GreenPhoenix1Q/2015Marvin$123,000$0Video Camera -
BlueLA1Q/2015Tom$236,955$4,885Video Camera -
BlueLA1Q/2015Janet$96,587$758Video Camera -
GreenLA1Q/2015Brian$156,235$0Video Camera -
BlueChicago1Q/2015Dawayne$158,962$1,423Video Camera -
BlueChicago1Q/2015Denise$96,325$2,458Video Camera -
GreenChicago1Q/2015Kathy$165,452$0Video Camera -
BluePhoenix2Q/2015Jim$12,500$1,245Video Camera -
BluePhoenix2Q/2015Mary$75,000$4,693Video Camera -
GreenPhoenix2Q/2015Ron$165,000$0Video Camera -
BlueLA2Q/2015Fred$12,500$1,247Video Camera -
BlueLA2Q/2015Jayn$75,000$4,573Video Camera -
GreenLA2Q/2015Bruce$165,000$0Video Camera -
BlueChicago2Q/2015Tim$12,500$412Video Camera -
BlueChicago2Q/2015Wayne$75,000$2,458Video Camera -
GreenChicago2Q/2015Cindy$165,000$0Video Camera -
BluePhoenix2Q/2015Amy$124,587$1,245Video Camera -
BluePhoenix2Q/2015Scott$54,778$4,693Video Camera -
GreenPhoenix2Q/2015Marvin$195,004$0Video Camera -
BlueLA2Q/2015Tom$50,654$1,247Video Camera -
BlueLA2Q/2015Janet$120,584$4,573Video Camera -
GreenLA2Q/2015Brian$173,547$0Video Camera -
BlueChicago2Q/2015Dawayne$23,548$412Video Camera -
BlueChicago2Q/2015Denise$85,000$2,458Video Camera -
GreenChicago2Q/2015Kathy$187,457$18,000Video Camera -
BluePhoenix3Q/2015Jim$135,000$5,000Video Camera -
BluePhoenix3Q/2015Mary$70,000$5,050Video Camera -
GreenPhoenix3Q/2015Ron$170,000$8,500Video Camera -

19. BlueLA3Q/2015Fred$135,000$9,000Video Camera -
BlueLA3Q/2015Jayn$70,000$1,474Video Camera -
GreenLA3Q/2015Bruce$170,000$4,500Video Camera -
BlueChicago3Q/2015Tim$135,000$10,000Video Camera -
BlueChicago3Q/2015Wayne$70,000$2,458Video Camera -
GreenChicago3Q/2015Cindy$170,000$3,500Video Camera -
BluePhoenix3Q/2015Amy$135,000$11,499Video Camera -
BluePhoenix3Q/2015Scott$70,000$8,500Video Camera -
GreenPhoenix3Q/2015Marvin$170,000$6,600Video Camera -
BlueLA3Q/2015Tom$135,000$4,700Video Camera -
BlueLA3Q/2015Janet$70,000$1,474Video Camera -
GreenLA3Q/2015Brian$170,000$3,500Video Camera -
BlueChicago3Q/2015Dawayne$135,000$17,000Video Camera -
BlueChicago3Q/2015Denise$70,000$2,458Video Camera -
GreenChicago3Q/2015Kathy$170,000$9,999Video Camera -
BluePhoenix4Q/2015Jim$150,000$15,000Video Camera -
BluePhoenix4Q/2015Mary$73,000$1,147Video Camera -
GreenPhoenix4Q/2015Ron$180,000$13,500Video Camera -
BlueLA4Q/2015Fred$150,000$17,000Video Camera -
BlueLA4Q/2015Jayn$73,000$4,573Video Camera -
GreenLA4Q/2015Bruce$180,000$9,000Video Camera -
BlueChicago4Q/2015Tim$150,000$16,500Video Camera -
BlueChicago4Q/2015Wayne$73,000$7,500Video Camera -
GreenChicago4Q/2015Cindy$180,000$9,500Video Camera -
BluePhoenix4Q/2015Amy$150,000$16,500Video Camera -
BluePhoenix4Q/2015Scott$73,000$11,200Video Camera -
GreenPhoenix4Q/2015Marvin$180,000$19,500Video Camera -
BlueLA4Q/2015Tom$150,000$8,900Video Camera -
BlueLA4Q/2015Janet$73,000$7,549Video Camera -
GreenLA4Q/2015Brian$180,000$9,549Video Camera -
BlueChicago4Q/2015Dawayne$150,000$37,000Video Camera -
BlueChicago4Q/2015Denise$73,000$13,500Video Camera -
GreenChicago4Q/2015Kathy$180,000$14,500
Rubic_Print_FormatCourse CodeClass CodeAssignment
TitleTotal PointsMGT-820MGT-820-O500Performing Analysis

20. of Data200.0CriteriaPercentageUnsatisfactory (0.00%)Less
Than Satisfactory (74.00%)Satisfactory (79.00%)Good
(87.00%)Excellent (100.00%)CommentsPoints
EarnedContent70.0%Create Tables of Data.5.0%Data tables are
not present.Data tables are present with details, but
incomplete.Data tables are present with details that are unclear
and lack details.Data tables are present with details that are
complete.Data tables are present with details that are
insightful.Discuss the Efficiency and Results Based Upon the
Tables.20.0%A discussion of the efficiencies and results of the
data analysis is not present.A discussion of the efficiencies and
results of the data analysis is present, but incomplete.A
discussion of the efficiencies and results of the data analysis is
present, but done at a cursory level.A discussion of the
efficiencies and results of the data analysis is clearly presented.
Discussion is convincing.A discussion of the efficiencies and
results of the data analysis is clearly presented. Discussion is
discerning.Identify Any Trends and Recommendations for
Senior Management Based on the Results.20.0%Discussion of
the trends presented by the data and recommendations to senior
management are not present.Discussion of the trends presented
by the data and recommendations to senior management are
present, but incomplete.Discussion of the trends presented by
the data and recommendations to senior management are
present, but done at a cursory level.Discussion of the trends
presented by the data and recommendations to senior
management are clearly present. Discussion is
convincing.Discussion of the trends presented by the data and
recommendations to senior management are clearly present.
Discussion is insightful, thorough, and appropriate.Discuss
Pivot Table Use for Data Analysis20.0%Discussion of the ease
of use, benefits, and drawbacks is not present.Discussion of the
ease of use, benefits, and drawbacks is present, but
incomplete.Discussion of the ease of use, benefits, and
drawbacks is presented, but done at a cursory level.Discussion
of the ease of use, benefits, and drawbacks is clearly present.

21. Recommendation for continued use or not is supported and
convincing.Discussion of the ease of use, benefits, and
drawbacks is clearly present. Recommendation for continued
use or not is supported and insightful.Uses at Least Three
Scholarly References5.0%No scholarly references are
provided.Only one reference is provided. Information presented
is from mostly authoritative scholarly sources, but some are
outdated.At least two references are provided. Information
presented is from mostly authoritative scholarly sources, but
some are outdated.Only two references are provided.
Information presented is from current scholarly sources.At least
three references are provided. Information presented is from
current scholarly sources.Organization and
Effectiveness20.0%Thesis Development and Purpose7.0%Paper
lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis
and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague;
purpose is not clear.Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and
appropriate to purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are clear and
forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and
reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the
purpose.Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The
essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis
statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.Argument Logic
and Construction8.0%Statement of purpose is not justified by
the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim
made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible
sources.Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument
lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic.
Some sources have questionable credibility.Argument is
orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument
presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically,
but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are
credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression
of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are

22. authoritative.Clear and convincing argument that presents a
persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All
sources are authoritative.Mechanics of Writing (includes
spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)5.0%Surface
errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of
meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence
construction are used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors
distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice
(register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are
present.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not
overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and
audience-appropriate language are used.Prose is largely free of
mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of
sentence structures and effective figures of speech are
used.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written,
academic English.Format10.0%Paper Format (Use of
appropriate style for the major and assignment)5.0%Template is
not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely
followed correctly.Appropriate template is used, but some
elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with
formatting is apparent.Appropriate template is used. Formatting
is correct, although some minor errors may be
present.Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually
no errors in formatting style.All format elements are
correct.Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing
and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as
appropriate to assignment and style)5.0%No reference page is
included. No citations are used.Reference page is present.
Citations are inconsistently used.Reference page is included and
lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately
documented, although some errors may be present.Reference
page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources.
Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually
correct.In-text citations and a reference page are complete and
correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of
error.Total Weightage100%