This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation
programme under Grant Agreement No 641988
SMART data collection and inteGRation platform to enhance availability
and accessibility of data and infOrmation in the EU territory on
SecoNDary Raw Materials
SMART GROUND approach and pilot sites
Giovanna Antonella Dino, Piergiorgio Rossetti, Giulio Biglia, Franco Ajmone Marsan,
Domenico Antonio De Luca, Manuela Lasagna, Luigi Perotti, Elena Belluso,
Silvana Capella (UNITO - Italy)
Heikki Särkkä (XAMK – Finland)
Walter Alberto, Mauro Palomba (IMAGEO – Italy)
Tuire Valjus - Timo Tarvainen - Mira Markovaara-Koivisto (GTK – Finland)
Csaba Vér (UP – Hungary)
Erno Garamvölgyi (BZN – Hungary)
Frederic Coulon, Stuart Wagland (CU – UK)
1. INTRODUCTION
Supply of Raw Materials – particularly, Critical Raw Materials - is fundamental to
maintain and develop EU economy. Considering their increasing scarcity and
raising prices, recycling and recovery from urban, industrial and extractive waste
disposal sites is important.
The need for RM continued to expand, as did the number of RM utilised in
industry, involving also metals and elements not known or used in the past.
www.smart-ground.eu
WASTE AS A
RESOURCE
MSWEW
INTRODUCTION
WHERE EXPLOIT
RM/CRM?
ORE BODIES
LANDFILL AND
EXTRACTIVE WASTE
FACILITIES
MINING
INDUSTRY
LANDFILL MINING
CHARACTERIZATION PHASE IS
INTRODUCTORY FOR
RM/CRM/SRM EXPLOITATION
www.smart-ground.eu
2www.smart-ground.eu
OBJECT TO CHARACTERIZE: EXTRACTIVE WASTE
Waste rock Tailings
OBJECT TO CHARACTERIZE: MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
Landfill
www.smart-ground.eu
OBJECT TO CHARACTERIZE: MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE
Plastic waste Metal waste
wood
Paper and cardboard
Textiles
Inert fractionOrganic fraction Glass and ceramics
WEEE
Miscellaneous combustibles
(including rubber, foam)
LANDFILL CHARACTERIZATION
www.smart-ground.eu
EW facilities MSW landfills
Info about mining context:
 Geological context
 Typology of ore deposit
 Main minerals (RM)
 Associated minerals/elements
(CRM/SRM)
 Excavation methods
 Dressing activities
 Waste categories
Info about operation history:
 Landfill category
 Presence of different layers
 Presence of different
landfilling areas
 Waste categories (EWC code)
 Presence of treatment plant
Geotechnical stability Geotechnical stability
Presence of hazardous waste placed in
the landfill
Presence of hazardous waste placed
in the landfill
Degradation stage of the landfill, i.e.
is methane being generated
STEP 1: PRELIMINARY INFORMATION
STEP 2: DEPOSIT
INVESTIGATION
(AREA , VOLUMES,
SAMPLING
POINTS, ETC…)
2
LANDFILL CHARACTERIZATION
GEOPHYSICAL TESTS
LASER SCANNING
PHOTOGRAMMETRY
EXISTING DATABASE
MAPS OF THE AREA
www.smart-ground.eu
LANDFILL CHARACTERISATION: AIJALA TAILINGS POND IN FINLAND
 Includes tailings from Aijala, Metsämonttu and
Telkkälä
 Geophysical (and geochemical investigations)
www.smart-ground.eu
Magnetics and GEM 2
To find out the magnetic and conductive
parts of the tailings pond.
GEM2: the conductivity distibution
1-10 m downward.
Electrical Resistivity
Tomography (ERT)
Layers of different
conductivities from
surface to the
bottom of tailings.
Gravity
The bottom surface
of tailings pond
and bedrock
topography
Line map of geophysical methods in Aijala
LANDFILL CHARACTERISATION: AIJALA TAILINGS POND IN FINLAND
www.smart-ground.eu
Magnetic susceptibility indicates
the Ni-consisting areas (red)
Electrical conductivity (mS/m)
indicates the sulphide consisting
areas (red)
CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: AIJALA TAILINGS POND IN FINLAND
www.smart-ground.eu
Gravity interpretation:
 Depth of the bottom of
tailings (red)
 Depth of bedrock
 Bounded to drilling data
ERT interpretation:
 Depth of layers of different
resistivity
 Depth of bedrock
3D interpretation of ERT lines
CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: AIJALA TAILINGS POND IN FINLAND
CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: AIJALA TAILINGS POND IN FINLAND
Drone mapping by IMAGEO, Aijala in September 2016
Area: 20 ha
(500m x 400m)
Drone: DJI Phantom4 Camera: internal 12 Mpixel
Flight H: 70m Speed: 3 m/s
Time: 3 flights 25’
CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: AIJALA TAILINGS POND IN FINLAND
N° pictures: 430
Overlap long/trans.
80% / 60%
Ground Pixel: 3cm
CLASSIFIED
POINT CLOUD
3D MODEL
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC 3D
MODEL MESH
CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: AIJALA TAILINGS POND IN FINLAND
 Gravity method was used to determine the bedrock level and the
thickness of the tailings.
 Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) showed the conductive areas,
different layers and the bottom level of the tailings pond.
 GEM-2 was tested to get more detailed picture of the distribution of
conductive material, but in this case it was not effective enough. We
found ERT to be better method for conductive environment.
 Magnetic method helped to detect the different type of Ni-consisting
areas.
 UAV was used to obtain a detailed reconstruction of the topographic
surface of site
Summary:
www.smart-ground.eu
It is important to program field survey in order to sample the proper
number of representative samples.
Sampling activity using a net scheme: suitable when the
extension and the shape of the landfill are adequate to arrange a
net scheme.
Random sampling activity: when it is not possible to arrange e net
scheme on the landfill area or when specific areas have to be
investigated (historical info)
PROTOCOLS FOR SITE INVESTIGATION
STEP 3: SAMPLING SCHEME TO ADOPT
www.smart-ground.eu
The sampling activity is the basis to define the portion of a
batch or of a parcel, necessary to determine the specific
characteristics of a material (rock, waste, etc..).
Such characteristics can be geometrical, physical, chemical,
mineralogical, etc...and their determination is necessary to
investigate the attitudes of a material to be used in a
specific application.
STEP 4: REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES OF THE
DEPOSITS
PROTOCOLS FOR SITE INVESTIGATION
www.smart-ground.eu
www.smart-ground.eu
SAMPLING TECHNIQUES
CORE DRILLING: DESTRUCTION
DRILLING
CORE DRILLING: DRILLING WITH
CORE RECOVERY
EXCAVATING
SAMPLING ACTIVITY USING HAND
SHOVEL
PROTOCOLS FOR SITE INVESTIGATION
www.smart-ground.eu
PROTOCOL FOR SAMPLING PPREPARATION: EW FACILITIES
STEP 5: SAMPLING AND SAMPLE SORTING
PROTOCOL FOR SAMPLING PREPARATION: MSW LANDFILLS
www.smart-ground.eu
STEP 5: SAMPLING AND SAMPLE SORTING
www.smart-ground.eu
PROTOCOLS FOR LANDFILL CHARACTERIZATION: EW FACILITIES
STEP 6: SAMPLE CHARACTERIZATION
Test to use fines
for
environmental
rehabilitation
Quartering
www.smart-ground.eu
Physical analysis Geo Chemical Analysis;
Mineralogy and Petrology
Other Analysis
Coarse fraction
for
RM/CRM
exploitation
• Humidity
• Bulk density
• Size distribution
• Whole rock geochemistry
• Single phase analyses
• Petrographic and
mineralogical
characterization
Coarse fraction
for
SRM
exploitation (eg.
Aggregate)
• Humidity
• Bulk density
• Size distribution
• Test for aggregate (Flat index;
Shape index; Los Angeles;
Microdeval; Freeze-thaw test;
Fine particles content; Etc... )
• Petrographic
characterization
Fine fraction for
RM/CRM
exploitation
• Humidity
• Bulk density
• Size distribution
• Whole rock geochemistry
• Single phase analyses
• Petrographic and
mineralogical
characterization
Fine Fraction for
soil production
• Humidity
• Bulk density
• Size distribution
• Atterberg limits
• Chemical analysis
• Leaching test
• Fitotoxicity
PROTOCOLS FOR LANDFILL CHARACTERIZATION: EW FACILITIES
PROTOCOLS FOR LANDFILL CHARACTERIZATION: MSW LANDFILLS
Chemical analysis
(CRM content)
Collected waste
< 20 mm > 20 mm
Environmental
analysis
(leaching
tests)
Physical and chemical
analysis (SRM content,
e.g. metal, soil and
energy fraction)
STEP 6: SAMPLE CHARACTERIZATION
www.smart-ground.eu
www.smart-ground.eu
Fine fraction <20 mm
Total organic carbon (TOC)
Leaching test eluate analysis: As, Ba, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb,
Se, Zn, Cl, F, SO4, DOC
CRM:
Elemental composition (Cu, Al, Sb, Li, Co, Cr, Mg)
REEs: Sc, Y, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Yb
Lu PGMs: Pt, Pd, Ru
Other: In, Ag, Au
Biogas potential
Metal fraction
Visual inspection
Share of non-metal parts attached to metals (degree of liberation)
Division to magnetic and non-magnetic metals (Cu+Al) and stainless
steel
Soil fraction Visual inspection (most likely mainly stones + bricks)
Energy fraction
Drying (to enable shredding and homogenisation for representative
determination of calorific values)
Visual inspection + weighing of the fines that detach from the
combustibles when dried
Elemental composition
Calorific value
PROTOCOLS FOR LANDFILL CHARACTERIZATION: MSW LANDFILLS
ITALY
• CDW treatment plant: CAVIT spa La Loggia (Torino)
• Feldspar production from granite dumps exploitation: Montorfano mining
area – Minerali Industriali
• Waste facilities of extractive industries which contains metals as Zn, Pb and
possible CRM as Ge, Cd, In, etc : Gorno mining district landfill
• Waste facilities of extractive industries which contains Ni, Cu and possible
CRM as PGE: Campello Monti mining district
FINLAND
• Waste facilities of extractive industries-Tailings from mining containing Cu, Zn,
S, Ag, Au: Aijala mining area
• MSW landfill: Metsäsairila landfill
• Private industry landfill; Waste from vehicle and aluminum industry:
Kuusakoski Oy landfill
HUNGARY
• Waste facilities of extractive industries containing siderite, barite, pyrite,
chalcopyrite: Rudabánya
• Waste facilities of extractive industries - tailings of the critical fluorite: Pátka
• MSW landfill: Debrecen landfill
CHARACTERIZING PILOT SITES
www.smart-ground.eu
STEP 7: PILOT SITES CHARACTERISATION
mine adits
dressing plant
Armando & Sabbadin, 1976
Orebodies
lens-shaped sulphide-rich
bodies within pyroxenites
Mining activity
1865 – 1945
Exploited for Ni
(1-2% to 0.5%)
5-6% Ni concentrate
(flotation)
CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: CAMPELLO MONTI, ITALY
www.smart-ground.eu
Recognition of 2 types of waste
materials:
- waste rock
- operating residues
Selection of 8 waste deposits:
6 waste rock
2 operating residues
CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: CAMPELLO MONTI, ITALY
www.smart-ground.eu
1
1
8
operating residues
CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: CAMPELLO MONTI, ITALY
www.smart-ground.eu
3 waste rock
CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: CAMPELLO MONTI, ITALY
www.smart-ground.eu
sampling protocol
manual sampling (hand shovel)
following a grid method.
Each sample (8-10 kg) was
collected in an area of 1.5 m2
after cleaning from organic
residues
For each sample point:
operator
date
UTM WGS84 coordinates
type of material
photos
notes
etc.
CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: CAMPELLO MONTI, ITALY
• ICP-MS multielements analysis (general geochemical screening)
• ICP-OES for samples with a content of some metals (Ni and/or Cu)
exceeding the upper limit for the previous analytical package (5,000 and
10,000 ppm, respectively)
• Fire Assay - ICP-MS analysis of Au, Pt and Pd of samples strongly enriched
in Ni and Cu
• NiS Fire Assay – INAA analysis of Pt, Pd, Os, Ir, Ru, Rh, Au and Re of
selected samples among those strongly enriched in Ni and Cu
Preliminary analyses on samples of the three size classes (>20 mm, 20-2 mm, <2 mm). As differences
were not significant, geochemical analyses were performed on the whole sample.
WHOLE-ROCK GEOCHEMISTRY
CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: CAMPELLO MONTI, ITALY
1: very strong Fe, Ni, Cu,
Co, ±PGE enrichments
3, 4, 8: strong Fe,
Ni, Cu, Co (±PGE)
enrichments
2, 6: moderate Fe, Ni,
Cu, Co enrichments
2, 6: relatively low Fe,
Ni, Cu, Co values
“waste” material is significantly
enriched in Fe, Ni, Co and locally PGE
Metals enrichments
are not uniform:
4 composition
groups are
identified
www.smart-ground.eu
CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: CAMPELLO MONTI, ITALY
I
II
III IV
ppm
Ni >10,000
Cu >5,000
Co >600
Ni 2,000÷10,000
Cu 600÷1,500
Co 100÷300
Ni 700÷1,600
Cu 200÷600
Co 100÷200
Ni 100÷700
Cu 50÷200
Co 50÷100
www.smart-ground.eu
CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: CAMPELLO MONTI, ITALY
po
pn
po
pn
cpy
Fe as pyrrhotite Fe1-xS (not an ore
mineral)
pentlandite (Fe,Ni)9S8
chalcopyrite CuFeS2
pentlandite and chalcopyrite mostly
occur as granular, relatively coarse-
grained ore minerals:
suitable for mineral dressing
www.smart-ground.eu
CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: CAMPELLO MONTI, ITALY
CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: METSÄSAIRILA MSW LANDFILL, FINLAND
www.smart-ground.eu
CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: METSÄSAIRILA MSW LANDFILL, FINLAND
Percentage distribution of sorted waste fractions from
sampling well drilled in closed landfill area
Percentage distribution of sorted waste fractions
from sampling well drilled in currently active landfill area
www.smart-ground.eu
www.smart-ground.eu
Data from landfill and
waste
characterization
Bibliographic
data
(paper, technical
report, statistics,
etc…)
Thematic maps based
on the characteristics of
the site and the
materials present in the
landfill
Best practices to evaluate
the screening methods to
get the resource effective
data collection from
landfills
Evaluation of SRM potentials,
similarities/differences between
the landfills and their potentials
Cartography-
satellite imagery
Reports &
Statistics
Data from EU
Open Database
INSPIRE & ISO
Compliant
SMART GROUND
DATABASE
User Friendly
Advanced Search
& Retrieval
STEP 8: FEEDING THE SG PLATFORM
SECONDARY RAW MATERIALS EXPLOITABLE FROM EW FACILITIES
STEP 9: SCHEME FOR SRM RECOVERY
www.smart-ground.eu
Collected waste
< 20 mm > 20 mm
PGMs
REEs
Metals
Refuse derived fuel (RDF)
Ferrous metallic product
Non-ferrous metallic product
SECONDARY RAW MATERIALS EXPLOITABLE FROM MSW LANDFILLS
STEP 9: SCHEME FOR SRM RECOVERY
www.smart-ground.eu
SECONDARY RAW MATERIALS EXPLOITABLE FROM MSW LANDFILLS
www.smart-ground.eu
Social impacts
(positive/negative)
associated to
landfill/waste recovery
Technologies for waste
recovery: costs
associated to investment,
trasport, treatment,
mainteance, etc…
SMART
GROUND
USER FRIENDLY
DATABASE
Best practices for the
evaluation of impacts
connected to landfill
and to waste recycling
(Different Scenarioes)
Waste streams – mass
balance / income
CBA/LCA evaluation
STEP 10: CRM/SRM RECOVERY SUSTAINABILITY
DECISION SUPPORT
TOOL
www.smart-ground.eu
Thank you for your attention!
Giovanna Antonella DINO
giovanna.dino@unito.it
www.smart-ground.eu

3 SMART GROUND - COCOON - RAWFILL Workshop

  • 1.
    This project hasreceived funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant Agreement No 641988 SMART data collection and inteGRation platform to enhance availability and accessibility of data and infOrmation in the EU territory on SecoNDary Raw Materials SMART GROUND approach and pilot sites Giovanna Antonella Dino, Piergiorgio Rossetti, Giulio Biglia, Franco Ajmone Marsan, Domenico Antonio De Luca, Manuela Lasagna, Luigi Perotti, Elena Belluso, Silvana Capella (UNITO - Italy) Heikki Särkkä (XAMK – Finland) Walter Alberto, Mauro Palomba (IMAGEO – Italy) Tuire Valjus - Timo Tarvainen - Mira Markovaara-Koivisto (GTK – Finland) Csaba Vér (UP – Hungary) Erno Garamvölgyi (BZN – Hungary) Frederic Coulon, Stuart Wagland (CU – UK)
  • 2.
    1. INTRODUCTION Supply ofRaw Materials – particularly, Critical Raw Materials - is fundamental to maintain and develop EU economy. Considering their increasing scarcity and raising prices, recycling and recovery from urban, industrial and extractive waste disposal sites is important. The need for RM continued to expand, as did the number of RM utilised in industry, involving also metals and elements not known or used in the past. www.smart-ground.eu
  • 3.
    WASTE AS A RESOURCE MSWEW INTRODUCTION WHEREEXPLOIT RM/CRM? ORE BODIES LANDFILL AND EXTRACTIVE WASTE FACILITIES MINING INDUSTRY LANDFILL MINING CHARACTERIZATION PHASE IS INTRODUCTORY FOR RM/CRM/SRM EXPLOITATION www.smart-ground.eu
  • 4.
    2www.smart-ground.eu OBJECT TO CHARACTERIZE:EXTRACTIVE WASTE Waste rock Tailings
  • 5.
    OBJECT TO CHARACTERIZE:MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE Landfill www.smart-ground.eu
  • 6.
    OBJECT TO CHARACTERIZE:MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE Plastic waste Metal waste wood Paper and cardboard Textiles Inert fractionOrganic fraction Glass and ceramics WEEE Miscellaneous combustibles (including rubber, foam)
  • 7.
    LANDFILL CHARACTERIZATION www.smart-ground.eu EW facilitiesMSW landfills Info about mining context:  Geological context  Typology of ore deposit  Main minerals (RM)  Associated minerals/elements (CRM/SRM)  Excavation methods  Dressing activities  Waste categories Info about operation history:  Landfill category  Presence of different layers  Presence of different landfilling areas  Waste categories (EWC code)  Presence of treatment plant Geotechnical stability Geotechnical stability Presence of hazardous waste placed in the landfill Presence of hazardous waste placed in the landfill Degradation stage of the landfill, i.e. is methane being generated STEP 1: PRELIMINARY INFORMATION
  • 8.
    STEP 2: DEPOSIT INVESTIGATION (AREA, VOLUMES, SAMPLING POINTS, ETC…) 2 LANDFILL CHARACTERIZATION GEOPHYSICAL TESTS LASER SCANNING PHOTOGRAMMETRY EXISTING DATABASE MAPS OF THE AREA www.smart-ground.eu
  • 9.
    LANDFILL CHARACTERISATION: AIJALATAILINGS POND IN FINLAND  Includes tailings from Aijala, Metsämonttu and Telkkälä  Geophysical (and geochemical investigations) www.smart-ground.eu
  • 10.
    Magnetics and GEM2 To find out the magnetic and conductive parts of the tailings pond. GEM2: the conductivity distibution 1-10 m downward. Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) Layers of different conductivities from surface to the bottom of tailings. Gravity The bottom surface of tailings pond and bedrock topography Line map of geophysical methods in Aijala LANDFILL CHARACTERISATION: AIJALA TAILINGS POND IN FINLAND www.smart-ground.eu
  • 11.
    Magnetic susceptibility indicates theNi-consisting areas (red) Electrical conductivity (mS/m) indicates the sulphide consisting areas (red) CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: AIJALA TAILINGS POND IN FINLAND www.smart-ground.eu
  • 12.
    Gravity interpretation:  Depthof the bottom of tailings (red)  Depth of bedrock  Bounded to drilling data ERT interpretation:  Depth of layers of different resistivity  Depth of bedrock 3D interpretation of ERT lines CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: AIJALA TAILINGS POND IN FINLAND
  • 13.
    CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES:AIJALA TAILINGS POND IN FINLAND Drone mapping by IMAGEO, Aijala in September 2016 Area: 20 ha (500m x 400m) Drone: DJI Phantom4 Camera: internal 12 Mpixel Flight H: 70m Speed: 3 m/s Time: 3 flights 25’
  • 14.
    CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES:AIJALA TAILINGS POND IN FINLAND N° pictures: 430 Overlap long/trans. 80% / 60% Ground Pixel: 3cm CLASSIFIED POINT CLOUD 3D MODEL PHOTOGRAMMETRIC 3D MODEL MESH
  • 15.
    CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES:AIJALA TAILINGS POND IN FINLAND  Gravity method was used to determine the bedrock level and the thickness of the tailings.  Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) showed the conductive areas, different layers and the bottom level of the tailings pond.  GEM-2 was tested to get more detailed picture of the distribution of conductive material, but in this case it was not effective enough. We found ERT to be better method for conductive environment.  Magnetic method helped to detect the different type of Ni-consisting areas.  UAV was used to obtain a detailed reconstruction of the topographic surface of site Summary: www.smart-ground.eu
  • 16.
    It is importantto program field survey in order to sample the proper number of representative samples. Sampling activity using a net scheme: suitable when the extension and the shape of the landfill are adequate to arrange a net scheme. Random sampling activity: when it is not possible to arrange e net scheme on the landfill area or when specific areas have to be investigated (historical info) PROTOCOLS FOR SITE INVESTIGATION STEP 3: SAMPLING SCHEME TO ADOPT www.smart-ground.eu
  • 17.
    The sampling activityis the basis to define the portion of a batch or of a parcel, necessary to determine the specific characteristics of a material (rock, waste, etc..). Such characteristics can be geometrical, physical, chemical, mineralogical, etc...and their determination is necessary to investigate the attitudes of a material to be used in a specific application. STEP 4: REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES OF THE DEPOSITS PROTOCOLS FOR SITE INVESTIGATION www.smart-ground.eu
  • 18.
    www.smart-ground.eu SAMPLING TECHNIQUES CORE DRILLING:DESTRUCTION DRILLING CORE DRILLING: DRILLING WITH CORE RECOVERY EXCAVATING SAMPLING ACTIVITY USING HAND SHOVEL PROTOCOLS FOR SITE INVESTIGATION
  • 19.
    www.smart-ground.eu PROTOCOL FOR SAMPLINGPPREPARATION: EW FACILITIES STEP 5: SAMPLING AND SAMPLE SORTING
  • 20.
    PROTOCOL FOR SAMPLINGPREPARATION: MSW LANDFILLS www.smart-ground.eu STEP 5: SAMPLING AND SAMPLE SORTING
  • 21.
    www.smart-ground.eu PROTOCOLS FOR LANDFILLCHARACTERIZATION: EW FACILITIES STEP 6: SAMPLE CHARACTERIZATION Test to use fines for environmental rehabilitation Quartering
  • 22.
    www.smart-ground.eu Physical analysis GeoChemical Analysis; Mineralogy and Petrology Other Analysis Coarse fraction for RM/CRM exploitation • Humidity • Bulk density • Size distribution • Whole rock geochemistry • Single phase analyses • Petrographic and mineralogical characterization Coarse fraction for SRM exploitation (eg. Aggregate) • Humidity • Bulk density • Size distribution • Test for aggregate (Flat index; Shape index; Los Angeles; Microdeval; Freeze-thaw test; Fine particles content; Etc... ) • Petrographic characterization Fine fraction for RM/CRM exploitation • Humidity • Bulk density • Size distribution • Whole rock geochemistry • Single phase analyses • Petrographic and mineralogical characterization Fine Fraction for soil production • Humidity • Bulk density • Size distribution • Atterberg limits • Chemical analysis • Leaching test • Fitotoxicity PROTOCOLS FOR LANDFILL CHARACTERIZATION: EW FACILITIES
  • 23.
    PROTOCOLS FOR LANDFILLCHARACTERIZATION: MSW LANDFILLS Chemical analysis (CRM content) Collected waste < 20 mm > 20 mm Environmental analysis (leaching tests) Physical and chemical analysis (SRM content, e.g. metal, soil and energy fraction) STEP 6: SAMPLE CHARACTERIZATION www.smart-ground.eu
  • 24.
    www.smart-ground.eu Fine fraction <20mm Total organic carbon (TOC) Leaching test eluate analysis: As, Ba, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Mo, Ni, Pb, Sb, Se, Zn, Cl, F, SO4, DOC CRM: Elemental composition (Cu, Al, Sb, Li, Co, Cr, Mg) REEs: Sc, Y, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Yb Lu PGMs: Pt, Pd, Ru Other: In, Ag, Au Biogas potential Metal fraction Visual inspection Share of non-metal parts attached to metals (degree of liberation) Division to magnetic and non-magnetic metals (Cu+Al) and stainless steel Soil fraction Visual inspection (most likely mainly stones + bricks) Energy fraction Drying (to enable shredding and homogenisation for representative determination of calorific values) Visual inspection + weighing of the fines that detach from the combustibles when dried Elemental composition Calorific value PROTOCOLS FOR LANDFILL CHARACTERIZATION: MSW LANDFILLS
  • 25.
    ITALY • CDW treatmentplant: CAVIT spa La Loggia (Torino) • Feldspar production from granite dumps exploitation: Montorfano mining area – Minerali Industriali • Waste facilities of extractive industries which contains metals as Zn, Pb and possible CRM as Ge, Cd, In, etc : Gorno mining district landfill • Waste facilities of extractive industries which contains Ni, Cu and possible CRM as PGE: Campello Monti mining district FINLAND • Waste facilities of extractive industries-Tailings from mining containing Cu, Zn, S, Ag, Au: Aijala mining area • MSW landfill: Metsäsairila landfill • Private industry landfill; Waste from vehicle and aluminum industry: Kuusakoski Oy landfill HUNGARY • Waste facilities of extractive industries containing siderite, barite, pyrite, chalcopyrite: Rudabánya • Waste facilities of extractive industries - tailings of the critical fluorite: Pátka • MSW landfill: Debrecen landfill CHARACTERIZING PILOT SITES www.smart-ground.eu STEP 7: PILOT SITES CHARACTERISATION
  • 26.
    mine adits dressing plant Armando& Sabbadin, 1976 Orebodies lens-shaped sulphide-rich bodies within pyroxenites Mining activity 1865 – 1945 Exploited for Ni (1-2% to 0.5%) 5-6% Ni concentrate (flotation) CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: CAMPELLO MONTI, ITALY www.smart-ground.eu
  • 27.
    Recognition of 2types of waste materials: - waste rock - operating residues Selection of 8 waste deposits: 6 waste rock 2 operating residues CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: CAMPELLO MONTI, ITALY www.smart-ground.eu
  • 28.
    1 1 8 operating residues CHARACTERISING PILOTSITES: CAMPELLO MONTI, ITALY www.smart-ground.eu
  • 29.
    3 waste rock CHARACTERISINGPILOT SITES: CAMPELLO MONTI, ITALY www.smart-ground.eu
  • 30.
    sampling protocol manual sampling(hand shovel) following a grid method. Each sample (8-10 kg) was collected in an area of 1.5 m2 after cleaning from organic residues For each sample point: operator date UTM WGS84 coordinates type of material photos notes etc. CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: CAMPELLO MONTI, ITALY
  • 31.
    • ICP-MS multielementsanalysis (general geochemical screening) • ICP-OES for samples with a content of some metals (Ni and/or Cu) exceeding the upper limit for the previous analytical package (5,000 and 10,000 ppm, respectively) • Fire Assay - ICP-MS analysis of Au, Pt and Pd of samples strongly enriched in Ni and Cu • NiS Fire Assay – INAA analysis of Pt, Pd, Os, Ir, Ru, Rh, Au and Re of selected samples among those strongly enriched in Ni and Cu Preliminary analyses on samples of the three size classes (>20 mm, 20-2 mm, <2 mm). As differences were not significant, geochemical analyses were performed on the whole sample. WHOLE-ROCK GEOCHEMISTRY CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: CAMPELLO MONTI, ITALY
  • 32.
    1: very strongFe, Ni, Cu, Co, ±PGE enrichments 3, 4, 8: strong Fe, Ni, Cu, Co (±PGE) enrichments 2, 6: moderate Fe, Ni, Cu, Co enrichments 2, 6: relatively low Fe, Ni, Cu, Co values “waste” material is significantly enriched in Fe, Ni, Co and locally PGE Metals enrichments are not uniform: 4 composition groups are identified www.smart-ground.eu CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: CAMPELLO MONTI, ITALY
  • 33.
    I II III IV ppm Ni >10,000 Cu>5,000 Co >600 Ni 2,000÷10,000 Cu 600÷1,500 Co 100÷300 Ni 700÷1,600 Cu 200÷600 Co 100÷200 Ni 100÷700 Cu 50÷200 Co 50÷100 www.smart-ground.eu CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: CAMPELLO MONTI, ITALY
  • 34.
    po pn po pn cpy Fe as pyrrhotiteFe1-xS (not an ore mineral) pentlandite (Fe,Ni)9S8 chalcopyrite CuFeS2 pentlandite and chalcopyrite mostly occur as granular, relatively coarse- grained ore minerals: suitable for mineral dressing www.smart-ground.eu CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES: CAMPELLO MONTI, ITALY
  • 35.
    CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES:METSÄSAIRILA MSW LANDFILL, FINLAND www.smart-ground.eu
  • 36.
    CHARACTERISING PILOT SITES:METSÄSAIRILA MSW LANDFILL, FINLAND Percentage distribution of sorted waste fractions from sampling well drilled in closed landfill area Percentage distribution of sorted waste fractions from sampling well drilled in currently active landfill area www.smart-ground.eu
  • 37.
    www.smart-ground.eu Data from landfilland waste characterization Bibliographic data (paper, technical report, statistics, etc…) Thematic maps based on the characteristics of the site and the materials present in the landfill Best practices to evaluate the screening methods to get the resource effective data collection from landfills Evaluation of SRM potentials, similarities/differences between the landfills and their potentials Cartography- satellite imagery Reports & Statistics Data from EU Open Database INSPIRE & ISO Compliant SMART GROUND DATABASE User Friendly Advanced Search & Retrieval STEP 8: FEEDING THE SG PLATFORM
  • 38.
    SECONDARY RAW MATERIALSEXPLOITABLE FROM EW FACILITIES STEP 9: SCHEME FOR SRM RECOVERY www.smart-ground.eu
  • 39.
    Collected waste < 20mm > 20 mm PGMs REEs Metals Refuse derived fuel (RDF) Ferrous metallic product Non-ferrous metallic product SECONDARY RAW MATERIALS EXPLOITABLE FROM MSW LANDFILLS STEP 9: SCHEME FOR SRM RECOVERY www.smart-ground.eu
  • 40.
    SECONDARY RAW MATERIALSEXPLOITABLE FROM MSW LANDFILLS www.smart-ground.eu Social impacts (positive/negative) associated to landfill/waste recovery Technologies for waste recovery: costs associated to investment, trasport, treatment, mainteance, etc… SMART GROUND USER FRIENDLY DATABASE Best practices for the evaluation of impacts connected to landfill and to waste recycling (Different Scenarioes) Waste streams – mass balance / income CBA/LCA evaluation STEP 10: CRM/SRM RECOVERY SUSTAINABILITY DECISION SUPPORT TOOL
  • 41.
  • 42.
    Thank you foryour attention! Giovanna Antonella DINO giovanna.dino@unito.it www.smart-ground.eu