Join us for an Employment Law Update webinar that will provide practical advice on how to comply with new requirements that California employers need to know in 2022.
We will discuss, among other topics:
COVID-19 Health and Safety Issues
Equity in the Workplace
Compensation and Wage and Hour
Leave, Benefits and Accommodations
2022 Employment Law Update | Public Entity EmployersMeyers Nave
Join us for an Employment Law Update webinar that will provide practical advice on how to comply with new requirements that California employers need to know in 2022.
We will discuss, among other topics:
COVID-19 Health and Safety Issues
Equity in the Workplace
Compensation and Wage and Hour
Leave, Benefits and Accommodations
Navigating the Pathways of Vaccine Mandates and Current COVID-19 Litigation Meyers Nave
Employers and entities have begun to institute COVID-19 vaccine mandates and programs, and are now experiencing resistance from some employees and unions. How are employers navigating COVID mandates, resistance, and responses? In the shifting legal landscape, how are employers and entities exploring avenues to keep employees and the public safe? Where do things stand on legal challenges to vaccine mandates?
Join Meyers Nave Chair of First Amendment and Trial and Litigation Practice Groups, Deborah Fox, and Meyers Nave Chair of Labor and Employment and Workplace Investigations Practice Groups, Camille Hamilton Pating, as they provide a webinar to help private and public employers navigate this nuanced legal arena and its complex practical considerations.
The webinar covers:
Types of COVID-19 mandates including public accommodations
Types of resistance to mandates
Current litigation trends
Accommodations and required documentation
Mandatory vs. Voluntary COVID-19 Vaccination Policies: What California Employ...Meyers Nave
Now that COVID-19 vaccines are gradually rolling out, employers are asking if they can – and should – require employees to get vaccinated and are considering what they can do if employees refuse. Given the complexity of navigating federal and state laws, MOUs, personnel rules, and practical considerations, employers should consult legal counsel before creating and implementing a mandatory or voluntary vaccination policy. Our Labor and Employment Law attorneys are assisting California employers regarding all legal issues related to COVID-19 vaccines. Our team provided a webinar on February 3 to address the myriad COVID-19 vaccination issues, including how employers can meet EEOC requirements, increase workplace safety, and minimize risk.
2021 Employment Law Update - Public/Non-Profit EmployersMeyers Nave
Meyers Nave invites you to view our Employment Law Update webinar. Among other topics, we will discuss:
COVID-19 Health and Safety Issues: COVID-19 notification requirements (AB 685), new Cal/OSHA regulations, workers’ comp changes (SB 1159), and vaccines in the workplace (Law360 recently reported that “in-house legal professionals overwhelmingly cite employment liability as the biggest legal risk they're facing related to the global health crisis, with many readying themselves for employment litigation they believe is in the pipeline.”)
Equity in the Workplace: new pay data reporting requirements (SB 973), new FEHA regulations, and diversity training
Compensation and Wage and Hour: amendments to the AB 5 independent contractor law (AB 2257 and Prop. 22), Right of Recall ordinances, and new wage and hour developments
Leave, Benefits and Accommodations: expanded leave (SB 1383, AB 2017) and COVID-19 leave (AB 1867)
2021 Employment Law Update - Public Entity EmployersMeyers Nave
Meyers Nave invites you to view our Employment Law Update webinar for practical advice on how to comply with new requirements that California employers need to know in 2021.
Among other topics, we discuss:
COVID-19 Health and Safety Issues: COVID-19 notification requirements (AB 685), new Cal/OSHA regulations, workers’ comp changes (SB 1159), and vaccines in the workplace (Law360 recently reported that “in-house legal professionals overwhelmingly cite employment liability as the biggest legal risk they're facing related to the global health crisis, with many readying themselves for employment litigation they believe is in the pipeline.”)
Equity in the Workplace: new pay data reporting requirements (SB 973), new FEHA regulations, and diversity training
Compensation and Wage and Hour: amendments to the AB 5 independent contractor law (AB 2257 and Prop. 22), Right of Recall ordinances, and new wage and hour developments
Leave, Benefits and Accommodations: expanded leave (SB 1383, AB 2017) and COVID-19 leave (AB 1867)
First and Foremosts September 2021 Presentationlerchearly
This document provides a summary of recent legal updates on vaccine mandates from a presentation by employment attorneys. It discusses President Biden's plan to require vaccination for federal employees, federal contractors, healthcare workers receiving Medicare/Medicaid funds, and private employers with over 100 employees. It also provides recommendations for employers on implementing a mandatory vaccination policy, including determining vaccination status, deciding what type of mandate to impose, addressing compensation issues, and handling accommodation requests.
Employment Law and Freedom of Speech: What Can and Can’t Employers Do When Em...Meyers Nave
Employees have become increasingly vocal in expressing their political, cultural, and social views on- and off-duty. How can employers protect employee freedoms while maintaining a welcoming workplace, limiting discord and division, and preserving the organization’s values and reputation? These questions have been top-of-mind for employers, as employee self-expression has increased in volume and intensity with recent high-profile movements and events, including #MeToo, Black Lives Matter, and the violent storming of the U.S. Capitol on January 6.
Meyers Nave attorneys Arlene Yang and David Mehretu provided a webinar to help private and public employers navigate this nuanced legal arena and its complex practical considerations.
The Webinar Covers:
First Amendment and employment law
Special concerns of public employers, especially concerning public safety employees
Social media policies
Policies and litigation regarding workplace attire
Collective bargaining and the National Labor Relations Act
California laws prohibiting retaliation for engaging in political activity
Intricacies of internal message boards and discussion groups
Challenges regulating employee self-expression in the work from home environment
2022 Employment Law Update | Public Entity EmployersMeyers Nave
Join us for an Employment Law Update webinar that will provide practical advice on how to comply with new requirements that California employers need to know in 2022.
We will discuss, among other topics:
COVID-19 Health and Safety Issues
Equity in the Workplace
Compensation and Wage and Hour
Leave, Benefits and Accommodations
Navigating the Pathways of Vaccine Mandates and Current COVID-19 Litigation Meyers Nave
Employers and entities have begun to institute COVID-19 vaccine mandates and programs, and are now experiencing resistance from some employees and unions. How are employers navigating COVID mandates, resistance, and responses? In the shifting legal landscape, how are employers and entities exploring avenues to keep employees and the public safe? Where do things stand on legal challenges to vaccine mandates?
Join Meyers Nave Chair of First Amendment and Trial and Litigation Practice Groups, Deborah Fox, and Meyers Nave Chair of Labor and Employment and Workplace Investigations Practice Groups, Camille Hamilton Pating, as they provide a webinar to help private and public employers navigate this nuanced legal arena and its complex practical considerations.
The webinar covers:
Types of COVID-19 mandates including public accommodations
Types of resistance to mandates
Current litigation trends
Accommodations and required documentation
Mandatory vs. Voluntary COVID-19 Vaccination Policies: What California Employ...Meyers Nave
Now that COVID-19 vaccines are gradually rolling out, employers are asking if they can – and should – require employees to get vaccinated and are considering what they can do if employees refuse. Given the complexity of navigating federal and state laws, MOUs, personnel rules, and practical considerations, employers should consult legal counsel before creating and implementing a mandatory or voluntary vaccination policy. Our Labor and Employment Law attorneys are assisting California employers regarding all legal issues related to COVID-19 vaccines. Our team provided a webinar on February 3 to address the myriad COVID-19 vaccination issues, including how employers can meet EEOC requirements, increase workplace safety, and minimize risk.
2021 Employment Law Update - Public/Non-Profit EmployersMeyers Nave
Meyers Nave invites you to view our Employment Law Update webinar. Among other topics, we will discuss:
COVID-19 Health and Safety Issues: COVID-19 notification requirements (AB 685), new Cal/OSHA regulations, workers’ comp changes (SB 1159), and vaccines in the workplace (Law360 recently reported that “in-house legal professionals overwhelmingly cite employment liability as the biggest legal risk they're facing related to the global health crisis, with many readying themselves for employment litigation they believe is in the pipeline.”)
Equity in the Workplace: new pay data reporting requirements (SB 973), new FEHA regulations, and diversity training
Compensation and Wage and Hour: amendments to the AB 5 independent contractor law (AB 2257 and Prop. 22), Right of Recall ordinances, and new wage and hour developments
Leave, Benefits and Accommodations: expanded leave (SB 1383, AB 2017) and COVID-19 leave (AB 1867)
2021 Employment Law Update - Public Entity EmployersMeyers Nave
Meyers Nave invites you to view our Employment Law Update webinar for practical advice on how to comply with new requirements that California employers need to know in 2021.
Among other topics, we discuss:
COVID-19 Health and Safety Issues: COVID-19 notification requirements (AB 685), new Cal/OSHA regulations, workers’ comp changes (SB 1159), and vaccines in the workplace (Law360 recently reported that “in-house legal professionals overwhelmingly cite employment liability as the biggest legal risk they're facing related to the global health crisis, with many readying themselves for employment litigation they believe is in the pipeline.”)
Equity in the Workplace: new pay data reporting requirements (SB 973), new FEHA regulations, and diversity training
Compensation and Wage and Hour: amendments to the AB 5 independent contractor law (AB 2257 and Prop. 22), Right of Recall ordinances, and new wage and hour developments
Leave, Benefits and Accommodations: expanded leave (SB 1383, AB 2017) and COVID-19 leave (AB 1867)
First and Foremosts September 2021 Presentationlerchearly
This document provides a summary of recent legal updates on vaccine mandates from a presentation by employment attorneys. It discusses President Biden's plan to require vaccination for federal employees, federal contractors, healthcare workers receiving Medicare/Medicaid funds, and private employers with over 100 employees. It also provides recommendations for employers on implementing a mandatory vaccination policy, including determining vaccination status, deciding what type of mandate to impose, addressing compensation issues, and handling accommodation requests.
Employment Law and Freedom of Speech: What Can and Can’t Employers Do When Em...Meyers Nave
Employees have become increasingly vocal in expressing their political, cultural, and social views on- and off-duty. How can employers protect employee freedoms while maintaining a welcoming workplace, limiting discord and division, and preserving the organization’s values and reputation? These questions have been top-of-mind for employers, as employee self-expression has increased in volume and intensity with recent high-profile movements and events, including #MeToo, Black Lives Matter, and the violent storming of the U.S. Capitol on January 6.
Meyers Nave attorneys Arlene Yang and David Mehretu provided a webinar to help private and public employers navigate this nuanced legal arena and its complex practical considerations.
The Webinar Covers:
First Amendment and employment law
Special concerns of public employers, especially concerning public safety employees
Social media policies
Policies and litigation regarding workplace attire
Collective bargaining and the National Labor Relations Act
California laws prohibiting retaliation for engaging in political activity
Intricacies of internal message boards and discussion groups
Challenges regulating employee self-expression in the work from home environment
The document provides updates on various employment law topics from Lerch, Early & Brewer. It summarizes changes and guidance from the EEOC, DOL, CDC, OSHA, and other agencies. Key updates include the EEOC clarifying religious objections to vaccine requirements and COVID-19 as a disability; DC enacting COVID-19 vaccination leave; states restricting vaccine mandates; the CDC updating masking guidance; and OSHA announcing increased inspections at healthcare facilities.
This document summarizes a webinar on managing workforces legally in 2022. It covers Covid-19 workplace policies including mandatory vaccination requirements. It also discusses federal developments like independent contractor standards. Other topics are restrictive covenants, criminal history discrimination laws, and data privacy acts. The webinar provides an overview of recent laws and guidance for employers to consider in developing compliant employment policies.
Employment Law and COVID 19 Chamber Chatlerchearly
Employers are likely to see an increase in COVID-19-related lawsuits as more and more people head back to work amid the lifting of coronavirus-related restrictions.
Congrats on surviving this year of multiple changes in the Employee Benefits industry. With more legal changes anticipated in 2020, we want to help you not only review your compliance readiness for the recently implemented laws, but help you and your team build a solid 2020 Watchlist for the new year.
Both focusing on 2019 year-end and looking ahead to 2020, this webinar will cover:
Multiple-employer plans -- What new guidance means for your business
New correction options under the IRS Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System, plus the most common 2019 plan errors we saw and how to fix them
Hardship distributions and participant loans -- Imminent deadlines for amendments and updated tips
New health reimbursement options -- How useful are they?
How to treat coupons used by plan participants to help pay for prescription drugs
New Medicare Secondary Payer reporting rules apply January 2020 -- What should you do?
What's New, What's Changed and What's Next.
Join us for our annual Employment Law Update webinar that provided practical advice on how to comply with new requirements that California employers need to know in 2023.
We discussed, among other topics:
New pay transparency law
New rights to unpaid leave to care for a “designated person”
New law regarding marijuana use off-the-job
COVID-19 updates
Expanded requirements for private employers under the California Consumer Privacy Act
This document summarizes five key employment law cases from 2015:
1. McConaghie v. Systemgroup Consulting Inc. found an employer discriminated against a female employee by holding a "Men's Day" event that excluded her. The employer was ordered to pay damages.
2. Wilson v. Atomic Energy established that without cause dismissals under the Canada Labour Code are not automatically unjust, allowing some flexibility for employers.
3. Thompson v. Cardel Homes was found to be a constructive dismissal when the employer asked an employee not to return to work before the end of their fixed term contract.
4. Paquette v. Quadraspec Inc. determined that termination pay must include
Topics include the following:
- issues related to COVID-19 in the workplace, including paid leave rights and benefits, return to work standards, and work-from-home arrangements
- Supreme Court decisions on sexual orientation discrimination, Age Discrimination in Employment Act and Equal Pay Act
- new regulations under the Fair Labor Standards Act
- expansion of employee rights and employer obligations under Illinois Law
- upcoming anti-harassment training deadline
- legal requirements taking effect in the second half of 2020 and in January 2021
- the impact of a California court’s decision regarding gig workers
- and more…
Topics include the following:
- issues related to COVID-19 in the workplace, including paid leave rights and benefits, return to work standards, and work-from-home arrangements
- Supreme Court decisions on sexual orientation discrimination, - Age Discrimination in Employment Act and Equal Pay Act
- new regulations under the Fair Labor Standards Act
- expansion of employee rights and employer obligations under Illinois Law
- upcoming anti-harassment training deadline
- legal requirements taking effect in the second half of 2020 and in January 2021
- the impact of a California court’s decision regarding gig workers
- and more…
When employers are faced with terminating employees in California, they often miss the numerous required notices and action steps they must take at or before the time of termination in order to comply with the law. In this presentation, Beth Arnese and I go over how to handle terminations in a legally compliant manner (not to mention as kindly and consciously as possible - which prevents lawsuits and bad karma).
Topics addressed include federal and state requirements for terminating employees, the necessary forms and notices, the California Unemployment Insurance Code, final wages, termination letters, COBRA and Cal-COBRA coverage, and severance pay and agreements.
Topics discussed:
- New Legislation - Private Employers
- New Legislation - Public Employers
- Wage and Hour Law
- Disability, Discrimination and Medical Leaves
- Discrimination, Harassment and Retaliation
- Religion in the Workplace
- Update: Public Agency Case Studies
BB&K Labor & Employment Practice Group Presenters:
Alison Alpert, Partner (San Diego, CA)
Cynthia Germano, Partner (Riverside, CA)
Joseph Ortiz, Partner (Riverside, CA)
Arlene Prater, Partner (San Diego, CA)
Lowell Zeta, Associate (Riverside, CA)
This document provides an overview of ERISA compliance requirements for employee benefit plans. It discusses filing Form 5500 annually, having proper plan documents like a summary plan description, and being prepared for potential audits from agencies like the Department of Labor. Filing deadlines and penalties for noncompliance are also reviewed. The presentation aims to help employers understand ERISA obligations and ensure their benefit plans would survive an audit.
That's a Wrap! Employee Benefits Year-End Reminders (and a Preview of 2019 Ch...Quarles & Brady
Join us for this interactive session where we will discuss the top employee benefits changes in 2018 and provide a preview of what to expect in 2019. We will discuss:
- Based on recent case law, should your plans contain a "choice of law" or "mandatory arbitration" provision?
- What retirement plan amendments must you do—and which are optional?
- New health plan changes, including the new proposed HRA rules.
This document provides a summary of a presentation given by attorneys Michael Patrick O'Brien and Elena T. Vetter at the 2022 Legislative and Regulatory Update seminar at the Marriott City Center Hotel on June 16, 2022. The presentation covered key regulatory changes and legislative actions at the federal and Utah levels impacting employers over the last two years, including increases to the minimum wage, changes to vaccine and testing requirements, updated COVID-19 guidance, and notable bills from the 2022 Utah legislative session. Attendees were advised that the information provided is not legal advice and to consult legal counsel on these issues.
What to Expect in Human Resources Management in 2022: A Review of Recent Deve...Overholt Law
The document summarizes an upcoming webinar presented by Overholt Law LLP on recent developments in workplace law. The webinar will cover topics such as COVID-19 policies and return to work plans, bullying and harassment complaints, systemic discrimination claims, and restrictive covenants. It provides details on the presenter, Carman J. Overholt, QC, and moderator, Kai Ying. An overview of the webinar agenda and subsequent slides provide more details on each topic.
2023 Employment Law Update | Public EntitiesMeyers Nave
Join us for our annual Employment Law Update webinar that will provide practical advice on how to comply with new requirements that California employers need to know in 2023.
We will discuss, among other topics:
New pay transparency law
New rights to unpaid leave to care for a “designated person”
New law regarding marijuana use off-the-job
COVID-19 updates
Expanded requirements for private employers under the California Consumer Privacy Act
A Modern Look at Contractors v. EmployeesDiana Maier
Whether you’re a business owner concerned with making the right distinctions when engaging people to work with/for you, or a lawyer responsible for advising clients on the contractor v. employee distinction, this presentation could save you a lot of grief and money down the line.
Marin County-based employment lawyer Diana Maier and Carlos E. Torres, a Hearing Officer for the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE), discuss which factors matter most in deciding how to classify workers in light of recent legal decisions that are shifting those factors. In addition to covering a broad overview of the contractor v. employee debate, they also discuss ethical considerations for lawyers considering the question of contractor classification, and assess whether the sharing economy is due for extinction in light of recent rulings against companies such as Uber.
HR Webinar: Employee vs. Contractor: Changes That Will Impact All EmployersAscentis
Although the pandemic-related recession had a brief downward impact on gig workers overall, the trend is clear: being your own boss is a concept gaining popularity at an impressive rate. The overall number of Americans classifying themselves as freelancers rose from 53 million to 59 million from 2014 to 2020. And even the core classification of self-employed individuals (incorporated or not) has risen by 17 percent in just one year – from 8.221 million in April, 2020, to 9.651 million in April, 2021, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The rapid growth in the ranks of independent contractors has naturally spurred greater interest in the regulations surrounding worker classification – both in terms of the loss of benefits and protections for those leaving traditional employment, and the potential for abuse of the worker classification process by employers.
During the last year, the states have been brewing up their own changes in employment classification laws, led by California’s AB 5, which was passed, then repealed and replaced with AB 2257. At the federal level, with the transition to single-party control in the House, Senate (barely) and Presidency, the Protecting the Right to Organize (“PRO”) Act (H.R. 842) is making its way through Congress, and may even find a home inside the massive infrastructure bill now being debated on Capitol Hill. The PRO Act, as currently written, would include the most comprehensive amendment to the terms “employee,” “employer,” and “supervisor,” since the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 became law.
So how will all of these convergent changes settle out? And most importantly, how can employers plan for the expected changes on this contentious topic?
Canadian Employment Law 101 for U.S. Legal & HRNow Dentons
Canadian Employment Law 101 for U.S. Legal & HR includes Key differences U.S. vs. Canadian Employment Law, Background Checking, Education/Professional Certification Checks and Credit Checks.
Path Out of the Pandemic Employment Roundtable 2021-10-14lerchearly
President Biden announced a "Path Out of the Pandemic" plan with multiple requirements for employers, including that all federal employees and contractors be vaccinated. The plan also directs OSHA to require employers with 100+ employees to ensure their workforce is fully vaccinated or tested weekly. The presentation discusses the vaccine requirements for federal contractors and provides recommendations for private employers to develop vaccination policies in light of emerging mandates.
The Builder’s Remedy for Housing: What Agencies, Developers, and Advocates Sh...Meyers Nave
“Builder’s Remedy” – two words capturing headlines throughout the State due to the ongoing housing availability and affordability crises.
This webinar will address many aspects of this provision of the Housing Accountability Act and how it relates to the State’s Housing Element requirements, including:
What is the Builder’s Remedy, who can use it, and when can it be used?
What are the limitations to the Builder’s Remedy?
What does this mean for local jurisdictions?
How is the Builder’s Remedy being applied in development applications and litigation?
The document provides an overview of the Meyers Nave law firm, including recent wins and accomplishments, upcoming events, and introductions to the marketing and business development team members. It summarizes recent successes of lawyers at the firm, leadership changes, recognition and awards received in 2021, and upcoming handbooks.
More Related Content
Similar to 2022 Employment Law Update | Private Sector & Non-Profit Employers
The document provides updates on various employment law topics from Lerch, Early & Brewer. It summarizes changes and guidance from the EEOC, DOL, CDC, OSHA, and other agencies. Key updates include the EEOC clarifying religious objections to vaccine requirements and COVID-19 as a disability; DC enacting COVID-19 vaccination leave; states restricting vaccine mandates; the CDC updating masking guidance; and OSHA announcing increased inspections at healthcare facilities.
This document summarizes a webinar on managing workforces legally in 2022. It covers Covid-19 workplace policies including mandatory vaccination requirements. It also discusses federal developments like independent contractor standards. Other topics are restrictive covenants, criminal history discrimination laws, and data privacy acts. The webinar provides an overview of recent laws and guidance for employers to consider in developing compliant employment policies.
Employment Law and COVID 19 Chamber Chatlerchearly
Employers are likely to see an increase in COVID-19-related lawsuits as more and more people head back to work amid the lifting of coronavirus-related restrictions.
Congrats on surviving this year of multiple changes in the Employee Benefits industry. With more legal changes anticipated in 2020, we want to help you not only review your compliance readiness for the recently implemented laws, but help you and your team build a solid 2020 Watchlist for the new year.
Both focusing on 2019 year-end and looking ahead to 2020, this webinar will cover:
Multiple-employer plans -- What new guidance means for your business
New correction options under the IRS Employee Plans Compliance Resolution System, plus the most common 2019 plan errors we saw and how to fix them
Hardship distributions and participant loans -- Imminent deadlines for amendments and updated tips
New health reimbursement options -- How useful are they?
How to treat coupons used by plan participants to help pay for prescription drugs
New Medicare Secondary Payer reporting rules apply January 2020 -- What should you do?
What's New, What's Changed and What's Next.
Join us for our annual Employment Law Update webinar that provided practical advice on how to comply with new requirements that California employers need to know in 2023.
We discussed, among other topics:
New pay transparency law
New rights to unpaid leave to care for a “designated person”
New law regarding marijuana use off-the-job
COVID-19 updates
Expanded requirements for private employers under the California Consumer Privacy Act
This document summarizes five key employment law cases from 2015:
1. McConaghie v. Systemgroup Consulting Inc. found an employer discriminated against a female employee by holding a "Men's Day" event that excluded her. The employer was ordered to pay damages.
2. Wilson v. Atomic Energy established that without cause dismissals under the Canada Labour Code are not automatically unjust, allowing some flexibility for employers.
3. Thompson v. Cardel Homes was found to be a constructive dismissal when the employer asked an employee not to return to work before the end of their fixed term contract.
4. Paquette v. Quadraspec Inc. determined that termination pay must include
Topics include the following:
- issues related to COVID-19 in the workplace, including paid leave rights and benefits, return to work standards, and work-from-home arrangements
- Supreme Court decisions on sexual orientation discrimination, Age Discrimination in Employment Act and Equal Pay Act
- new regulations under the Fair Labor Standards Act
- expansion of employee rights and employer obligations under Illinois Law
- upcoming anti-harassment training deadline
- legal requirements taking effect in the second half of 2020 and in January 2021
- the impact of a California court’s decision regarding gig workers
- and more…
Topics include the following:
- issues related to COVID-19 in the workplace, including paid leave rights and benefits, return to work standards, and work-from-home arrangements
- Supreme Court decisions on sexual orientation discrimination, - Age Discrimination in Employment Act and Equal Pay Act
- new regulations under the Fair Labor Standards Act
- expansion of employee rights and employer obligations under Illinois Law
- upcoming anti-harassment training deadline
- legal requirements taking effect in the second half of 2020 and in January 2021
- the impact of a California court’s decision regarding gig workers
- and more…
When employers are faced with terminating employees in California, they often miss the numerous required notices and action steps they must take at or before the time of termination in order to comply with the law. In this presentation, Beth Arnese and I go over how to handle terminations in a legally compliant manner (not to mention as kindly and consciously as possible - which prevents lawsuits and bad karma).
Topics addressed include federal and state requirements for terminating employees, the necessary forms and notices, the California Unemployment Insurance Code, final wages, termination letters, COBRA and Cal-COBRA coverage, and severance pay and agreements.
Topics discussed:
- New Legislation - Private Employers
- New Legislation - Public Employers
- Wage and Hour Law
- Disability, Discrimination and Medical Leaves
- Discrimination, Harassment and Retaliation
- Religion in the Workplace
- Update: Public Agency Case Studies
BB&K Labor & Employment Practice Group Presenters:
Alison Alpert, Partner (San Diego, CA)
Cynthia Germano, Partner (Riverside, CA)
Joseph Ortiz, Partner (Riverside, CA)
Arlene Prater, Partner (San Diego, CA)
Lowell Zeta, Associate (Riverside, CA)
This document provides an overview of ERISA compliance requirements for employee benefit plans. It discusses filing Form 5500 annually, having proper plan documents like a summary plan description, and being prepared for potential audits from agencies like the Department of Labor. Filing deadlines and penalties for noncompliance are also reviewed. The presentation aims to help employers understand ERISA obligations and ensure their benefit plans would survive an audit.
That's a Wrap! Employee Benefits Year-End Reminders (and a Preview of 2019 Ch...Quarles & Brady
Join us for this interactive session where we will discuss the top employee benefits changes in 2018 and provide a preview of what to expect in 2019. We will discuss:
- Based on recent case law, should your plans contain a "choice of law" or "mandatory arbitration" provision?
- What retirement plan amendments must you do—and which are optional?
- New health plan changes, including the new proposed HRA rules.
This document provides a summary of a presentation given by attorneys Michael Patrick O'Brien and Elena T. Vetter at the 2022 Legislative and Regulatory Update seminar at the Marriott City Center Hotel on June 16, 2022. The presentation covered key regulatory changes and legislative actions at the federal and Utah levels impacting employers over the last two years, including increases to the minimum wage, changes to vaccine and testing requirements, updated COVID-19 guidance, and notable bills from the 2022 Utah legislative session. Attendees were advised that the information provided is not legal advice and to consult legal counsel on these issues.
What to Expect in Human Resources Management in 2022: A Review of Recent Deve...Overholt Law
The document summarizes an upcoming webinar presented by Overholt Law LLP on recent developments in workplace law. The webinar will cover topics such as COVID-19 policies and return to work plans, bullying and harassment complaints, systemic discrimination claims, and restrictive covenants. It provides details on the presenter, Carman J. Overholt, QC, and moderator, Kai Ying. An overview of the webinar agenda and subsequent slides provide more details on each topic.
2023 Employment Law Update | Public EntitiesMeyers Nave
Join us for our annual Employment Law Update webinar that will provide practical advice on how to comply with new requirements that California employers need to know in 2023.
We will discuss, among other topics:
New pay transparency law
New rights to unpaid leave to care for a “designated person”
New law regarding marijuana use off-the-job
COVID-19 updates
Expanded requirements for private employers under the California Consumer Privacy Act
A Modern Look at Contractors v. EmployeesDiana Maier
Whether you’re a business owner concerned with making the right distinctions when engaging people to work with/for you, or a lawyer responsible for advising clients on the contractor v. employee distinction, this presentation could save you a lot of grief and money down the line.
Marin County-based employment lawyer Diana Maier and Carlos E. Torres, a Hearing Officer for the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE), discuss which factors matter most in deciding how to classify workers in light of recent legal decisions that are shifting those factors. In addition to covering a broad overview of the contractor v. employee debate, they also discuss ethical considerations for lawyers considering the question of contractor classification, and assess whether the sharing economy is due for extinction in light of recent rulings against companies such as Uber.
HR Webinar: Employee vs. Contractor: Changes That Will Impact All EmployersAscentis
Although the pandemic-related recession had a brief downward impact on gig workers overall, the trend is clear: being your own boss is a concept gaining popularity at an impressive rate. The overall number of Americans classifying themselves as freelancers rose from 53 million to 59 million from 2014 to 2020. And even the core classification of self-employed individuals (incorporated or not) has risen by 17 percent in just one year – from 8.221 million in April, 2020, to 9.651 million in April, 2021, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The rapid growth in the ranks of independent contractors has naturally spurred greater interest in the regulations surrounding worker classification – both in terms of the loss of benefits and protections for those leaving traditional employment, and the potential for abuse of the worker classification process by employers.
During the last year, the states have been brewing up their own changes in employment classification laws, led by California’s AB 5, which was passed, then repealed and replaced with AB 2257. At the federal level, with the transition to single-party control in the House, Senate (barely) and Presidency, the Protecting the Right to Organize (“PRO”) Act (H.R. 842) is making its way through Congress, and may even find a home inside the massive infrastructure bill now being debated on Capitol Hill. The PRO Act, as currently written, would include the most comprehensive amendment to the terms “employee,” “employer,” and “supervisor,” since the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 became law.
So how will all of these convergent changes settle out? And most importantly, how can employers plan for the expected changes on this contentious topic?
Canadian Employment Law 101 for U.S. Legal & HRNow Dentons
Canadian Employment Law 101 for U.S. Legal & HR includes Key differences U.S. vs. Canadian Employment Law, Background Checking, Education/Professional Certification Checks and Credit Checks.
Path Out of the Pandemic Employment Roundtable 2021-10-14lerchearly
President Biden announced a "Path Out of the Pandemic" plan with multiple requirements for employers, including that all federal employees and contractors be vaccinated. The plan also directs OSHA to require employers with 100+ employees to ensure their workforce is fully vaccinated or tested weekly. The presentation discusses the vaccine requirements for federal contractors and provides recommendations for private employers to develop vaccination policies in light of emerging mandates.
Similar to 2022 Employment Law Update | Private Sector & Non-Profit Employers (20)
The Builder’s Remedy for Housing: What Agencies, Developers, and Advocates Sh...Meyers Nave
“Builder’s Remedy” – two words capturing headlines throughout the State due to the ongoing housing availability and affordability crises.
This webinar will address many aspects of this provision of the Housing Accountability Act and how it relates to the State’s Housing Element requirements, including:
What is the Builder’s Remedy, who can use it, and when can it be used?
What are the limitations to the Builder’s Remedy?
What does this mean for local jurisdictions?
How is the Builder’s Remedy being applied in development applications and litigation?
The document provides an overview of the Meyers Nave law firm, including recent wins and accomplishments, upcoming events, and introductions to the marketing and business development team members. It summarizes recent successes of lawyers at the firm, leadership changes, recognition and awards received in 2021, and upcoming handbooks.
SB 9 And The “End of Single Family Zoning” in California: What You Need To KnowMeyers Nave
Governor Newsom recently signed SB 9 into law which takes effect in January 2022, requiring cities and counties to ministerially approve certain two-unit projects and lot splits. Under the law, if a lot split is followed by the development of a two-unit project on each lot, four units could be built on what was previously a single-family residential parcel. The new law allows local agencies to adopt objective standards to govern these types of projects, yet imposes restrictions on what agencies can require, including limits on parking and setback requirements. Additionally, in order to qualify for a two-unit development or lot split, parcels must meet certain criteria under the law.
The practical impact of SB 9 is that local agencies will lose significant local authority related to development of property in single family zoning districts.
Join Meyers Nave on Monday, September 27 at 12:00 p.m. to explore key issues related to SB 9 including:
What parcels qualify for a two-unit development or lot split
Criteria for approving SB 9 projects
Discretion retained by local agencies to restrict and regulate SB 9 projects
The webinar will also cover additional housing legislation signed by the Governor, including SB 8. We will leave ample time for questions and a lively discussion.
COVID-19 Return to Work Plan: Who Returns, When, Where & HowMeyers Nave
As COVID-19 vaccines become more available, bringing employees back to work safely requires a detailed Return to Work Plan. Employers must adapt to ever-changing local, state and national requirements to keep employees, clients, customers, vendors, and the visiting public safe. Meyers Nave Labor and Employment Law Principals Camille Hamilton Pating and Arlene Yang presented a webinar on employers’ frequently asked questions.
The webinar covered:
Determining who returns to work and when, where, and how
Vaccination policy options
Managing workplace safety on a daily basis, including travel, health checks, masks and social distancing, and other requirements
Mandated legal reporting of COVID-19 positive cases
What to do when an employee refuses the vaccine or refuses to return to work
Resources for the evolving hybrid workplace
Avoiding the types of employment litigation claims most likely to arise from the “new normal” workplace
Vapor Intrusion Developments and Concerns in CaliforniaMeyers Nave
Vapor Intrusion is the migration of chemical vapors from the subsurface into commercial and residential buildings. Vapors can migrate through soil and into buildings through cracks in foundations, basements, crawl spaces and sewers. In February 2020, the Department of Toxic Substances Control, the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the State Water Resources Control Board issued in draft form Supplemental Guidance: Screening and Evaluating Vapor Intrusion which recommends a consistent approach when screening buildings for subsurface vapor risk to occupants and describes a framework for deciding when cleanup and/or mitigation is needed.
The regulated community expected regulators to finalize the long-awaited Guidance, but that may be delayed now that recent studies performed by the DTSC have emerged showing that the Supplemental Vapor Intrusion Guidance may have gone too far in its estimation of risk. The delay may provide some relief to site owners due to concerns that the attenuation factors prescribed in the Guidance were too conservative and would have made it impossible to achieve closure for sites with soil vapor contamination.
Strategies for Obtaining Public Agency Approvals and Minimizing Legal Risks f...Meyers Nave
The two most complex challenges in the development and on-time completion of professional sports facilities are (1) obtaining the myriad of approvals and permits from local, state and federal agencies and (2) defending against a broad range of legal objections that project opponents often pursue in court. These challenges are becoming more complicated as sports facilities are likely to be part of larger mixed-use developments with companion residential, commercial, hotel, entertainment and convention uses.
This presentation covers:
Land use approvals, environmental review, community benefit agreements, public financing, and community outreach
Transportation (parking, public transit, traffic control), noise, and financing
Special legislation to facilitate and streamline sports facility project approvals and environmental review and expedite court challenges to these projects
Strategies for negotiating approvals and agreements with public agencies and the community
Litigation defense strategies that will help keep completion deadlines on track
SB 743 & VMT – CEQA Implementation and Issues for Agencies and DevelopersMeyers Nave
This document discusses CEQA requirements for analyzing vehicle miles traveled (VMT) impacts beginning July 1, 2020. It outlines key issues agencies and developers will face in implementing VMT analysis, including screening criteria, thresholds of significance, and mitigation measures. The main topics covered are screening mechanisms to determine when a VMT analysis is not required; thresholds for determining significant impacts for different land uses; adoption processes; and challenges around measuring and enforcing VMT reduction.
PFAS Update: The “Forever Chemical” in the News, in the Movies and in the CourtsMeyers Nave
Federal regulation of PFAS is increasing and California recently set regulatory standards stricter than the rest of the nation. National attention to the potential environmental and health effects – and associated litigation and liabilities – of PFAS is also increasing due to the recent movie “Dark Waters” and two investigative documentaries titled “The Devil We Know” and “No Defense: the United States Military’s War on Water.”
Meyers Nave Of Counsel Viviana Heger presented a one-hour MCLE webinar that covers the following PFAS topics:
Sources, uses and the ubiquitous presence of PFAS
PFAS toxic tort litigation and state settlements
Compliance with the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act
Strategies to address regulatory actions in California
Recent Congressional activities
EPA’s New PFAS Action Plan and Addition of 160 PFAS to Toxics Release Inventory
California Bills banning PFAS in firefighting foam and expanding water testing for all PFAS
Manufacturers’ and purchasers’ voluntary phase-out programs
Non-liability of public utilities
Source determination and clean up
Next on the horizon: PFAS compounds, bio-solids, and crops
Newsom Issues Three COVID-19 Brown Act Orders: Here’s What He Urgently ChangedMeyers Nave
Governor Newsom recently signed three Executive Orders that changed fundamental limitations and requirements of the Brown Act. He signed Executive Order N-25-20 on March 12, Executive Order N-29-20 on March 17, and Executive Order N-35-20 on March 21. Before everyone had figured out the section of the March 12 order that addressed the Brown Act, parts of that section were withdrawn and superseded by the March 17 order and the remaining parts continued in the March 17 order. And then the March 21 order made more changes – all of which relate to the COVID-19 pandemic.
May Public Officials Block or Regulate Participation on Social Media Accounts?Meyers Nave
Government entities and elected officials are becoming more accessible and connected to the public through social media. The 21st century question is what may they do and not do to regulate the public’s participation on social media accounts? Deborah and Meg will explain how courts are analyzing different social media scenarios and the key factors that public entities and officials must consider when developing policies that govern the use of their social media accounts. They will provide important updates from oral argument on March 26 in the closely watched case of Knight First Amendment Institute v. Trump. In that case, the U.S. Department of Justice is appealing a lower court’s ruling that President Donald Trump’s blocking of critics from his Twitter account is unconstitutional.
California Voting Rights Act - Legal Challenges, Financial Risks and Complian...Meyers Nave
Public agencies across California are facing a wave of demand letters threatening litigation if they do not change their at-large elections (all voters can vote on all candidates) to district-based elections, which requires creating district maps that separate the public entity into defined geographic areas from which that area elects a representative.
Further, if public agencies do not switch to district elections, the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA) allows legal challenges to at-large elections. In those lawsuits, plaintiffs seek to prove that at-large elections dilute the voting strength of a protected class, which has been a low bar to cross. Further, public entities that are unsuccessful in defending a legal challenge to their voting system can be on the hook for paying hundreds of thousands of dollars in their own legal bills as well as those of the victorious plaintiff.
Meyers Nave attorneys Jason Rosenberg and Naree Chan provided a complimentary webinar to help public agencies understand the legal challenges and financial risks they face and, if they choose, how to transition to district-based elections in compliance with both the California Voting Rights Act and the Federal Voting Rights Act. Their webinar covers the pros and cons of at-large vs. district-based elections; legal and financial implications of city challenges to CVRA litigation; Safe Harbor provisions of AB 2123 and AB 350; and, relevant compliance criteria for drawing population maps for district-based elections.
How Do Municipalities Comply with the FCC’s New Rule on Small Cell Wireless D...Meyers Nave
California municipalities are constantly faced with a changing regulatory framework related to the next generation of wireless services, known as 5G, which requires installing vast numbers of small cell equipment. These new networks present completely different local regulatory issues than the 3G and 4G networks of the past, which involved constructing large towers with a coverage range of a few miles. Supporting advanced 4G and new 5G requires telecommunications companies to build thousands of small cells at a faster pace with a far greater density of deployment. Municipalities’ policies and ordinances must keep up with this fast-changing technology.
The FCC recently adopted a new “Declaratory Ruling and Third Report and Order” that interprets provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 to preempt local regulations that effectively prohibit the deployment of small cell wireless infrastructure in local communities. The FCC Ruling includes broad definitions of the types of local regulations that would be presumed to constitute an impermissible effective prohibition of wireless services, and establishes the applicable “shot clock” timelines by which local agencies must take action on small cell deployment applications.
Meyers Nave attorneys Jason Rosenberg and Claire Lai provided a webinar that explains the important new obligations for California municipalities. Their webinar covers rule violation, fees & charges, non-fee requirements, shot clocks, and grandfathering.
Legalized Recreational Marijuana: The New Wild Wild West for Commercial Activ...Meyers Nave
The Control, Regulate, and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA) creates a new licensing and regulatory structure for nonmedical marijuana activities, both personal and commercial. AUMA allows for substantial local control over the regulation of commercial marijuana activities, outdoor cultivation, and public consumption. The webinar focuses on impacts that the new law will have - and already is having - on local governments and private businesses involved in commercial marijuana activities.
The presenters address the myriad of new regulations that cover a range of commercial marijuana activities, including cultivation, manufacturing, testing, distribution, transport, marketing, sales, as well as issues related to taxation, licensing marijuana retailers, and consumption of marijuana in retail establishments. Private businesses and public agencies face equally complex regulatory, compliance, and enforcement challenges in what is expected to be a confusing regulatory environment throughout the state.
Legalized Recreational Marijuana: Land Use and Environmental LawsMeyers Nave
The Control, Regulate, and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA) presents a myriad of land use and environmental issues that will affect cultivators, distributors and other private entities and public agencies. Those issues touch on existing environmental and land use laws as well as new regulations that will be developed at the local and state levels. With regard to land use, AUMA allows local agencies to develop planning and zoning regulations. These regulations will address whether to allow such businesses, where such businesses may locate, and conditions for operating such businesses. The development of these regulations and approval of local permits, and State licensing procedures, are all subject to CEQA.
Further, there is a web of environmental regulations, both existing and soon to be developed, that must be considered and complied with by cultivators, distributors and other private entities and public agencies. Those regulations include water use and water rights, wastewater and wetlands permitting, species protection, and pesticide use, under federal, state, and local laws, including the Clean Water Act, Endangered Species Act, and California Fish and Game and Water Codes.
This webinar focuses on what municipalities can and cannot do through their land use powers to regulate nonmedical marijuana businesses, and strategies that private businesses and local governments can use in the coming months while the State crafts new regulations. The webinar also addresses the complex interplay of federal, state, and local environmental regulations that will affect this new industry.
Legalized Recreational Marijuana: State and Local Tax Implications Under Prop 64Meyers Nave
The legalization of recreational marijuana under the Control, Regulate, and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA) is expected to generate hundreds of millions of dollars in additional state and local tax revenues annually. AUMA imposes new state taxes on the cultivation and retail sale of both medical and recreational marijuana and allows local governments to tax recreational marijuana. Approximately 80 municipalities have adopted local taxes related to marijuana and many more are currently in discussions on the topic.
The webinar presenters explain the taxes imposed under AUMA, review the new funds and programs established under the new law, and describe the variety of options and strategies available to local jurisdictions that are interested in placing a marijuana tax on the ballot.
Legalized Recreational Marijuana: Local vs. State Regulation and the Trump Ad...Meyers Nave
This document provides an overview of legalized recreational marijuana in California, including the regulatory structure established under the Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA) and potential impacts of local regulation and the new presidential administration. It outlines the state agencies that will regulate different aspects of the marijuana industry, as well as the role of local approvals. Key issues discussed include local jurisdictions adopting regulations, uncertainty around federal enforcement under President Trump, challenges around banking for marijuana businesses, and other common problems that may arise.
AB 626: What It Means for Public Works Projects and What Public Agencies Need...Meyers Nave
Assembly Bill 626 was signed into law on September 29, 2016 and affects contracts for public works projects entered into on or after January 1, 2017. The Bill creates new requirements for administering the claims process for public works projects in California. Public agencies can now be forced to mediate unresolved claims during construction, and general contractors can file pass through claims against a public agency on behalf of subcontractors. AB 626 also establishes a strict timeline associated with the claim resolution process. The Bill will have a significant impact on how public agencies resolve claims arising from construction projects.
The presenters discuss which public agencies are required to comply with AB 626, the timelines associated with the new claim resolution process, and what language must be included in agencies' project plans and specifications. An overview of AB 626 titled "New Law Requires New Claim Resolution Process for Public Works" is available at meyersnave.com.
California’s New Affordable Housing Laws – Part ThreeMeyers Nave
Governor Brown signed 15 bills into law on September 29, 2017 that are designed to help address California's affordable housing crisis. The approved bills take different approaches to the housing shortage in California, including providing more funding for affordable housing development, streamlining local government approval of housing projects, restoring local government's authority to impose inclusionary housing requirements on private housing developers, and strengthening the state's anti-NIMBY laws.
The new laws have implications and obligations for municipalities, housing related public agencies, and private developers. To help explain the new affordable housing regulatory landscape, Meyers Nave presented a three-part series addressing the most critical issues under the new laws. This presentation focuses on tightening state requirements for local housing including:
-New Housing Element Law Requirements and New “No Net Loss” Requirements – State Tightening Local Accountability for Accommodating Fair Share of Housing Production (AB 1397, SB 166, AB 879, AB 72)
-New Housing Accountability Act requirements – Putting Teeth in State Anti-NIMBY Laws (SB 167, AB 678, AB 1515)
-Accessory Dwelling Unit Requirements – Making Second Units Workable for Homeowners (AB 494, SB 229)
-Do’s and Don’ts for local governments
-How developers can use the new laws to get housing projects approved
California’s New Affordable Housing Laws – Part TwoMeyers Nave
Governor Brown signed 15 bills into law on September 29, 2017 that are designed to help address California's affordable housing crisis. The approved bills take different approaches to the housing shortage in California, including providing more funding for affordable housing development, streamlining local government approval of housing projects, restoring local government's authority to impose inclusionary housing requirements on private housing developers, and strengthening the state's anti-NIMBY laws.
The new laws have broad implications and obligations for local municipalities, housing related public agencies, and the private developer community. To help explain the new affordable housing regulatory landscape, Meyers Nave offers a complimentary, three-part webinar series addressing the most critical issues under the new laws. In the first part of our series, we discussed SB 2, SB 3, AB 1505, AB 1598, and approaches being taken by local governments, including bond measures in Bay Area counties and a linkage fee in the City of Los Angeles.
Second Webinar:
This presentation discusses new methods for streamlining housing approvals including:
SB 35 – Streamlined Approval Process for Housing Projects
SB 540 – Workforce Housing Opportunity Zones
AB 73 – Housing Sustainability Districts
Using Existing Planning and CEQA Tools to Streamline Approval Process for Housing Projects
California’s New Affordable Housing Laws – Part OneMeyers Nave
Governor Brown signed 15 bills into law on September 29, 2017 that are designed to help address California's affordable housing crisis. The new laws have broad implications and obligations for local municipalities, housing related public agencies, and the private developer community. To help explain the new affordable housing regulatory landscape, Meyers Nave is offering a complimentary, three-part webinar series addressing the most critical issues under the new laws.
This presentation covers the following topics:
- New "permanent source" of funds in SB 2
- SB 3 bond on November 2018 ballot
- New inclusionary housing authority in AB 1505
- Tax Increment funding by Affordable Housing Authorities through AB 1598
- Approaches being taken by local governments, including bond measures in Bay Area counties and a linkage fee in the City of Los Angeles
Genocide in International Criminal Law.pptxMasoudZamani13
Excited to share insights from my recent presentation on genocide! 💡 In light of ongoing debates, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of this grave crime.
Business law for the students of undergraduate level. The presentation contains the summary of all the chapters under the syllabus of State University, Contract Act, Sale of Goods Act, Negotiable Instrument Act, Partnership Act, Limited Liability Act, Consumer Protection Act.
Lifting the Corporate Veil. Power Point Presentationseri bangash
"Lifting the Corporate Veil" is a legal concept that refers to the judicial act of disregarding the separate legal personality of a corporation or limited liability company (LLC). Normally, a corporation is considered a legal entity separate from its shareholders or members, meaning that the personal assets of shareholders or members are protected from the liabilities of the corporation. However, there are certain situations where courts may decide to "pierce" or "lift" the corporate veil, holding shareholders or members personally liable for the debts or actions of the corporation.
Here are some common scenarios in which courts might lift the corporate veil:
Fraud or Illegality: If shareholders or members use the corporate structure to perpetrate fraud, evade legal obligations, or engage in illegal activities, courts may disregard the corporate entity and hold those individuals personally liable.
Undercapitalization: If a corporation is formed with insufficient capital to conduct its intended business and meet its foreseeable liabilities, and this lack of capitalization results in harm to creditors or other parties, courts may lift the corporate veil to hold shareholders or members liable.
Failure to Observe Corporate Formalities: Corporations and LLCs are required to observe certain formalities, such as holding regular meetings, maintaining separate financial records, and avoiding commingling of personal and corporate assets. If these formalities are not observed and the corporate structure is used as a mere façade, courts may disregard the corporate entity.
Alter Ego: If there is such a unity of interest and ownership between the corporation and its shareholders or members that the separate personalities of the corporation and the individuals no longer exist, courts may treat the corporation as the alter ego of its owners and hold them personally liable.
Group Enterprises: In some cases, where multiple corporations are closely related or form part of a single economic unit, courts may pierce the corporate veil to achieve equity, particularly if one corporation's actions harm creditors or other stakeholders and the corporate structure is being used to shield culpable parties from liability.
Sangyun Lee, 'Why Korea's Merger Control Occasionally Fails: A Public Choice ...Sangyun Lee
Presentation slides for a session held on June 4, 2024, at Kyoto University. This presentation is based on the presenter’s recent paper, coauthored with Hwang Lee, Professor, Korea University, with the same title, published in the Journal of Business Administration & Law, Volume 34, No. 2 (April 2024). The paper, written in Korean, is available at <https://shorturl.at/GCWcI>.
Matthew Professional CV experienced Government LiaisonMattGardner52
As an experienced Government Liaison, I have demonstrated expertise in Corporate Governance. My skill set includes senior-level management in Contract Management, Legal Support, and Diplomatic Relations. I have also gained proficiency as a Corporate Liaison, utilizing my strong background in accounting, finance, and legal, with a Bachelor's degree (B.A.) from California State University. My Administrative Skills further strengthen my ability to contribute to the growth and success of any organization.
Receivership and liquidation Accounts
Being a Paper Presented at Business Recovery and Insolvency Practitioners Association of Nigeria (BRIPAN) on Friday, August 18, 2023.
The Future of Criminal Defense Lawyer in India.pdfveteranlegal
https://veteranlegal.in/defense-lawyer-in-india/ | Criminal defense Lawyer in India has always been a vital aspect of the country's legal system. As defenders of justice, criminal Defense Lawyer play a critical role in ensuring that individuals accused of crimes receive a fair trial and that their constitutional rights are protected. As India evolves socially, economically, and technologically, the role and future of criminal Defense Lawyer are also undergoing significant changes. This comprehensive blog explores the current landscape, challenges, technological advancements, and prospects for criminal Defense Lawyer in India.
This document briefly explains the June compliance calendar 2024 with income tax returns, PF, ESI, and important due dates, forms to be filled out, periods, and who should file them?.
2. 2
Presenters
David M. Middleton
Associate
(619) 330-1737
dmiddleton@meyersnave.com
Angelica M. Pe Benito
Associate
(510) 808-2000
apebenito@meyersnave.com
Arlene R. Yang
Principal
(619) 330-1729
ayang@meyersnave.com
3. 3
• Please note the information in this
presentation is subject to change
• This is an informative presentation
and not intended as legal advice
• Please consult with an attorney
for assistance with a particular issue
or problem
4. 4
1. COVID-19 Health and Safety
2. Equity in the Workplace
3. Compensation and Wage & Hour
4. Leaves, Benefits, and Accommodation
5. Questions
Agenda
6. 6
• November 2020 – adopted first COVID-19
Prevention Emergency Temporary Standards (ETS)
• Revised ETS goes into effect on January 14, 2022
Cal/OSHA Updates Emergency Temporary Standards
!
7. 7
Key Changes to the ETS
New Rule:
Employer is required to make COVID-19 testing available
at no cost, during paid time, to all employees who had a
close contact with a COVID-19 case
COVID-19 Testing for All Regardless of Vaccination Status
8. 8
Updated Rule:
Employers must notify employees, employee
representatives and any other workers at a worksite
of possible COVID-19 exposures within one business day
Key Changes to the ETS
Notification of Exposure in the Workplace
9. 9
Face Coverings
Key Changes to the ETS
New Rule:
Employees who are exempted from wearing a face
covering due to a medical or mental health condition,
or disability and cannot wear a non-restrictive alternative
must physically distance at least six feet from others and
either be fully vaccinated or tested at least weekly for
COVID-19
10. 10
Return to Work Criteria
Amended Rule: On January 6, 2022, Cal/OSHA updated its ETS to incorporate
California Department of Public Health guidance on isolation and quarantine:
Key Changes to the ETS
• Five (5) days to ten (10) isolation
• Test after 5 days
• Face covering requirement
• Workplace setting rules for asymptomatic employees
• Local public health officers and local health jurisdictions
11. 11
• Review COVID-19 prevention plans and ensure that they are
in compliance with the emergency standards as revised
Key Changes to the ETS
Employer
Takeaways:
Public
Employers:
• The Cal/OSHA ETS applies to both private and public employers
https://www.dir.ca.gov/dosh/coronavirus/COVID19FAQs.html#iso
12. 12
12/13/2021– California Department of Public Health (CDPH) guidance temporarily
required masks to be worn in all indoor public settings, irrespective of vaccine status
until 1/15/2022
1/5/2022 - Due to a recent increase in cases, CDPH extended order to 2/15/2022.
New Temporary Indoor Mask Mandate
Employer
Takeaways:
Public
Employers:
• Modify policies to require masks to be
worn in the workplace, unless one of the
limited exemptions apply
• Local jurisdictions may have more
protective rules (ex. L.A.)
• These requirements apply to both public
and private employers
13. 13
Federal vaccine and vaccine or test mandates are being litigated:
1. Private employers with 100+ employees
OSHA - Fully vaccinated or test for COVID-19 weekly by 2/9/2022 (S. Ct. review)
Cal/OSHA – to issue its own regulations
2. Healthcare workers
Requires vaccinations for most healthcare workers/facilities that receive
Medicare/Medicaid reimbursements (S. Ct review)
3. Federal contractors and subcontractors
Exec. Order mandates vaccination (on hold - 6th Cir.)
4. Federal employees:
Fully vaccinated by 11/22/2021 (in litigation)
Status of Federal Vaccine Mandates
14. 14
• Courts will decide fate of vaccine
mandates
• Consider developing policies to
gathering vaccine information from
employees
• Consult with legal counsel
Vaccine or Test Mandate for 100+
Employer
Takeaways:
Public
Employers:
• In California, public employers with 100 or more employees
will likely be covered by the vaccine-or-testing mandate
15. 15
Recommendation:
Based on current science and public health agencies’ trends, revise “fully vaccinated”
to mean “received booster if booster eligible”
Employer Vaccine Policies
Many employers require employees to be “fully vaccinated” to enter the workspace
16. 16
• Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (15+ employees)
• Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1974 (15+ employees)
• California Fair Employment and Housing Act (5+ employees)
• Reasonable Accommodation
Disability
Sincerely Held Religious Belief
• Do not retaliate against anyone for engaging
in protected activity, such as requesting a
reasonable accommodation
Exemptions to the Vaccine Mandates
17. 17
Exemptions to Vaccine Mandates
Employer
Takeaways:
Public
Employers:
• Written policies for handling requests for
reasonable accommodations
• Train personnel who receive accommodations requests
• Applies to public and private employers
• Consult your Memorandum of Understanding (bargaining)
18. 18
Managers should look for signs of counterfeiting:
Absence of key information, including
manufacturer, lot number, date of vaccination,
and location of vaccination clinic or site
Vaccination dates that are inconsistent with
CDC guidelines
Misspellings
Counterfeit Vaccine Cards and Falsifying Vaccination Status
Cards printed on flimsy or poorly cut paper
Illegible government seals, or the lack thereof
Cards that appear to be entirely printed with no handwritten information
Uniformity of handwriting for a multi-dose vaccine, suggesting the card may
have been completed on a single date
19. 19
• Review policies regarding workplace safety and
employee conduct
• Refer to policies for questions about the legitimacy or
accuracy of an employee’s vaccination record or status
• Reinforce consequences for falsifying health records,
up to and including termination
• Warn employees that falsifying vaccine records is a
federal crime punishable by fines and/or imprisonment
Counterfeit Vaccine Cards and Falsifying Vaccination Status
Employer
Takeaways:
20. 20
• Ensure polices and procedures comply with Cal/OSHA standards
• Review site-specific workplace safety hazards to avoid citations
for violations
SB 606: Strengthens Cal/OSHA’s Enforcement Authority
Employer
Takeaways:
Public
Employers:
• Cal/OSHA has jurisdiction over almost every workplace in California,
including all state and local public agencies
• Communicate with Cal/OSHA about the timeline for producing
documents or information requested during an inspection
• Be mindful of any requests received from Cal/OSHA during the
course of an inspection and avoid citations
• Cooperate with Cal/OSHA to minimize the likeliness that the
agency will seek injunctive relief
22. 22
Serial plaintiffs allege websites are not accessible
Blind or low-sighted – website coding design not
compatible with screen readers
Deaf or hard of hearing – no closed captioning in
videos (and for public entities – live or pre-recorded
public meetings)
ADA Litigation Related to Website Compliance
• Follow generally recognized industry standards for website
accessibility, such as the Web Content Accessibility
Guidelines (Version 2.1)
Employer
Takeaways:
Public
Employers:
• Business and public entities must comply with the ADA
• Public entities – ADA Title II; Businesses – ADA Title III
23. 23
SB 331 - “Silenced No More Act” amends two laws that govern settlement
and non-disparagement agreements in the employment context
SB 331: “Silenced No More Act”
1) Settlement agreements cannot prevent disclosure
of facts surrounding a claim of workplace
discrimination or harassment based on any
category protected under the FEHA, or a claim of
retaliation for reporting or opposing such an act
2) Employers cannot require employees to sign either
a release or a non-disparagement agreement in
exchange for a raise or bonus or as a condition of
employment or continued employment
24. 24
SB 331: “Silenced No More Act”
Employer
Takeaways:
• Update forms and think carefully about resolving potential or
ongoing litigation
• Agreements with an employee for receipt of a raise, bonus,
new or continued employment, or separation from
employment:
Remove non-disparagement provisions that restricts the
employee’s ability to disclose information about
unlawful acts in the workplace
• Separation agreement:
Inform the employee of their right to consult an attorney
Give the employee at least five business days to do so
• SB 331 applies to settlement agreements entered into by
public and private employers
26. 26
The fate of AB-51
• In 2021, AB-51 banned mandatory arbitration
• U.S. Chamber of Commerce v. Bonta (9th Cir.)
• Currently stayed
Can California’s Private Attorneys General Act Claims Be Arbitrated?
• Does the Federal Arbitration Act permit arbitration agreements to prevent
employees from raising representative claims, including under PAGA?
• 12/15/2021, U.S. Supreme Ct. will hear Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana
Arbitration Agreements – Expect Changes in 2022
27. 27
Don’t Delay to Pay Arbitration Fees
• Since 2020, employer waives right to compel arbitration for failure to pay
arbitration fee within 30 days after due, with monetary and other possible sanctions
(SB 707)
• SB 762, now requires that the arbitrator:
issue invoices for fees and costs to all parties
on same day and same means, and
make the payment due upon receipt, unless
arbitration agreement expressly provides
otherwise
(Civ. Code § 16557.1; Code Civ. Proc. §§ 1281.97, 1281.98.)
Arbitration Agreements – Expect Changes in 2022
28. 28
Arbitration Agreements – Expect Changes in 2022
Employer
Takeaways:
Public
Employers:
• Include arbitration agreements in handbooks
• Update arbitration agreements
• Plan arbitration fees within 30 days of issuance of the invoice
• Be ready for changes to the law in 2022
• Arbitration agreements generally are not used by
public employers
Arbitration agreements can be a valuable tool for employers
Reduce cost, risk, and baseless claims
29. 29
29
Minimum Wage Increase/Increase in Salary for Exempt Employees
• Effective January 1, 2022
• California minimum wage increases
25 employees or less - $14 per hour
26 or more employees - $15 per hour
• Also affects minimum salary requirements for exempt
employees to qualify for the white collar exemptions
25 employees or less equals $58,240 per year
26 employees or more equals $62,400 per year
• Localities may impose their own minimum wages
San Jose – now $16.20 per hour for all employees
30. 30
• Update minimum wage payments and postings to reflect
state and local increases
• Ensure that exempt employees, including part-time
exempt employees, are being paid according to minimum
salary requirements
Minimum Wage Increase
Employer
Takeaways:
Public
Employers:
• Minimum wage requirements
are applicable to public and
private employers
31. 31
• Intentional theft of wages, including gratuities, in an amount greater
than $950 from any one employee, or $2,350 in the aggregate from
two or more employees, by an employer in any consecutive 12-month
period punishable as grand theft.
AB 1003: Expansion of Criminal Penalties for Wage Theft
Employer
Takeaways:
Public
Employers:
• AB 1003 applies to both
public and private employers
• Managers can be held criminally liable for theft of wages
• Take steps to ensure wage and hour compliance
• Train managers and employees
• Provide written policies on meal and rest breaks, overtime,
and off-the-clock work
• Any waivers must be in writing
33. 33
SB 95: Expiration of COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave
• Consult with legal counsel to determine
whether there are any other local laws
governing COVID-19 paid sick leave
• Employees are entitled to take time off
to receive the COVID-19 vaccination or
get tested for COVID-19 if employer’s
policies require them to do so
• When in effect, SB 95 applied to both
public and private employers
1. COVID-19 Testing for All Regardless of Vaccination Status.
Existing Rule: An employer is not required to make COVID-19 testing available to an employee who had a close contact if the employee is fully vaccinated.
New Rule: An employer is required to make COVID-19 testing available at no cost, during paid time, to all employees who had a close contact with a COVID-19 case, regardless of vaccination status, unless the employee recovered from COVID-19 within the past 90 days, and meets certain requirements.
5. Return to Work Criteria Provides a 14, 10 and 7-day Timeline.
• Existing Rule: A person who had a close contact is permitted to return to work after 10 days if they never developed symptoms.
• Amended Rule: A person who had a close contact but never developed symptoms may return to work after 14 days, except when:
a) 10 days have passed and the person wears a face covering and maintains six feet of distance from others while at the workplace for 14 days following the close contact, or
b) 7 days have passed, the person tested negative for COVID-19 at least 5 days after the close contact, and the person wears a face covering and maintains six feet of distance from others while at the workplace for 14 days following the close contact.
C. New Temporary Indoor Mask Mandate
On Monday, December 13, 2021, the California Department of Public Health issued guidance temporarily requiring masks to be worn in all indoor public settings, irrespective of vaccine status from December 15, 2021 to January 15, 2022. The Department of Public Health is concerned about the increased number of hospitalizations and cases in California, as well as the spread of the omicron variant. The guidance applies to all workplaces, whether or not they are open to the public. There are limited exemptions, such as if the workplace consists of a single employee, or may be removed while an employee is alone in a closed office or room.
For local jurisdictions with pre-existing masking requirements irrespective of vaccine status, in indoor public settings, prior to December 13, 2021, those local health orders continue to apply.
The new guidance is located at: https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/Pages/COVID-19/Face-Coverings-QA.aspx.
Takeaways for Employers: Employers should modify their policies to require masks to be worn in the workplace, unless one of the limited exemptions apply. While the mandate is scheduled to end on January 15, 2022, in light of the current vaccine mandate wave, it would not be surprising if the California Department of Public Health extends this mandate
Public Employers: These requirements apply to both public and private employers.
Effective January 1, 2022, the California minimum wage will increase to $14 per hour for small employers with 25 or fewer employees, and to $15 per hour for large employers with 26 or more employees. As enacted under Senate Bill 3, this is the final minimum wage increase of a pre-determined dollar amount for larger employers, while the schedule of increases was delayed by one year until 2023 for smaller employers. After minimum wage reaches $15 for all employers, the minimum wage will be adjusted annually for inflation based on the national consumer price index for urban wage earners and clerical workers.
Employers should note that minimum wage increases also affect the salaries of exempt employees due to the requirement that exempt employees earn no less than two times the state minimum wage for full-time work. In the case of small employers, two times the minimum wage of $14 per hour equals a minimum salary of $58,240 per year in order to qualify for exemptions. For large employers, two times the minimum wage of $15 per hour equals a minimum salary of $62,400 in order to qualify for exemptions. The minimum salary applies to both full-time and part-time exempt employees.
Finally, employers must be aware of local minimum wage increases imposed by your city or county. Employers must follow the stricter standard that provides the greatest benefit to employees. For example, minimum wage in the City of San Jose increased to $16.20 per hour for all employees, effective January 1, 2022. Thus, employers within the City of San Jose’s jurisdiction must pay employees according to the local minimum wage.